On the Cottingham formula and the electromagnetic contribution to the proton-neutron mass splitting

Andre Walker-Loud

arxiv: 1907.05459 · v1 · pith:YOB6A6KPnew · submitted 2019-07-11 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-lat· hep-ph

On the Cottingham formula and the electromagnetic contribution to the proton-neutron mass splitting

Andre Walker-Loud This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 22:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-lathep-ph

keywords Cottingham formulaproton neutron mass differenceelectromagnetic contributionsubtraction functionRegge modelinterpolationQED QCD mixingnucleon mass splitting

0 comments

The pith

Walker-Loud-Carlson-Miller interpolation yields more reliable uncertainty for electromagnetic proton-neutron mass splitting than Regge model

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review explains the Cottingham formula that relates the forward Compton amplitude to the electromagnetic self-energy of the nucleon. Renormalization mixes electromagnetic and strong contributions, and the subtraction function at zero momentum must be modeled to obtain a number. The paper contrasts the traditional Regge model with an interpolation that connects exact low-Q-squared results from chiral perturbation theory to exact high-Q-squared results from perturbative QCD. A reader cares because accurate separation of the two sources of the neutron-proton mass difference tests fundamental parameters of the Standard Model. Adoption of the interpolation approach would allow future work to report smaller, better justified theoretical errors on the electromagnetic piece.

Core claim

The central claim is that modeling the subtraction function in the Cottingham formula by interpolating between rigorously calculable low- and high-Q² regimes produces a more reliable estimate of the theoretical uncertainty on the electromagnetic contribution to the proton-neutron mass difference than the earlier Regge parameterization.

What carries the argument

The subtraction function required by the Cottingham formula, modeled through an interpolation anchored to known limits at low and high momentum transfer.

If this is right

The electromagnetic contribution to the mass splitting can be determined with controlled theoretical uncertainty.
This allows a sharper determination of the up-down quark mass difference from the observed neutron-proton mass difference.
The same modeling can be applied to electromagnetic self-energies of other hadrons.
Lattice calculations of nucleon masses that include QED can cross-check against the Cottingham result.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Adopting this method could revise the extracted quark-mass contribution by an amount comparable to current lattice uncertainties.
The technique may extend to calculations of electromagnetic corrections in other observables such as nucleon form factors or decay rates.
An independent verification would come from a direct lattice simulation of the full QED+QCD mass difference without using dispersion relations.

Load-bearing premise

The subtraction function between the low- and high-momentum regimes is well approximated by a smooth interpolation that does not introduce additional structure or large errors.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD computation performed with dynamical photons that directly measures the electromagnetic self-energy difference and finds a result lying outside the error band predicted by the interpolation model.

read the original abstract

The excess mass of the neutron over the proton arises from two sources within the Standard Model, electromagnetism and the splitting of the down and up quark masses. The Cottingham Formula provides a means of determining the QED corrections from the forward Compton Amplitude, but this is challenged by the need for a subtraction function and the mixing of the QED and QCD (electro-weak) effects. I review the present understanding of the Cottingham Formula, including a discussion on the development of the formula, its renormalization which induces the mixing of QED and QCD effects, and the necessary modeling of the subtraction function that must be done to arrive a numerical prediction. I summarize the Regge Model originally proposed by Gasser and Leutwyler and I also review the proposed model by Walker-Loud, Carlson and Miller, which is an interpolation function between the low and high $Q^2$ regimes, both of which are anchored by rigorous theoretical underpinnings, for which I argue a more reliable theoretical uncertainty estimate can be obtained.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a review recapping the Cottingham formula and arguing that the Walker-Loud-Carlson-Miller interpolation gives better uncertainty control than the Regge model, with no new derivations or numbers.

read the letter

This paper is a review of the Cottingham formula and the modeling needed to extract the electromagnetic contribution to the proton-neutron mass difference. It walks through the formula's history, the renormalization that mixes QED and QCD effects, and the subtraction function problem that forces some modeling choice. The main argument is that the interpolation between rigorously known low-Q2 and high-Q2 regimes (from the author's earlier work with Carlson and Miller) yields more reliable theoretical uncertainties than the Gasser-Leutwyler Regge model. The presentation of both approaches is clear and the anchors for the interpolation are stated explicitly. The paper does a decent job laying out why the subtraction function is the central difficulty and how different models handle the dispersion relation. Nothing in the text is new. No fresh derivation appears, no new numerical result is computed, and the comparison between models rests entirely on the prior interpolation paper rather than anything shown here. The claim of improved uncertainty is presented as an argument rather than demonstrated with explicit error budgets or cross-checks in these pages. That is the main limitation: the work stays at the level of summarizing and advocating for one existing approach. The discussion of renormalization-induced mixing is standard and does not introduce contradictions or overlooked assumptions. This is useful background for people already working on nucleon structure or lattice QCD calculations of isospin violation. A reader outside that narrow area will not find much of interest, and even specialists will mostly see a compact recap rather than original analysis. I would send it to peer review if the journal is considering review articles on this topic. The treatment is careful and the issues it flags are real, even though the paper itself adds no new evidence.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the Cottingham formula for the electromagnetic contribution to the proton-neutron mass splitting. It covers the formula's development, renormalization effects that induce QED-QCD mixing, and the modeling of the required subtraction function. The central argument is that the Walker-Loud-Carlson-Miller interpolation between rigorously anchored low-Q² and high-Q² regimes yields a more reliable theoretical uncertainty estimate than the Gasser-Leutwyler Regge model.

Significance. If the argument holds, the review clarifies a key theoretical bottleneck in Standard Model calculations of isospin breaking, potentially guiding more controlled dispersion-relation or lattice analyses of the neutron-proton mass difference. The explicit anchoring of the WLCM model to known regimes is a strength that could improve uncertainty quantification in this area.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and discussion of WLCM model] Abstract and main discussion of subtraction-function models: the central claim that the WLCM interpolation provides a more reliable uncertainty estimate than the Regge model rests on the smoothness and anchoring assumptions of the prior WLCM construction, but the manuscript presents this as an argument without a new quantitative error comparison or explicit propagation of uncertainties between the two models.

minor comments (1)

The manuscript would benefit from numbered section headings when summarizing the Regge model versus the WLCM interpolation to improve navigation for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the recommendation of minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and discussion of WLCM model] Abstract and main discussion of subtraction-function models: the central claim that the WLCM interpolation provides a more reliable uncertainty estimate than the Regge model rests on the smoothness and anchoring assumptions of the prior WLCM construction, but the manuscript presents this as an argument without a new quantitative error comparison or explicit propagation of uncertainties between the two models.

Authors: The manuscript is a review summarizing existing literature on the Cottingham formula, its renormalization, and subtraction-function models. The argument favoring the WLCM interpolation is taken directly from the original Walker-Loud–Carlson–Miller construction, which anchors the low-Q² regime to chiral perturbation theory (or lattice results) and the high-Q² regime to perturbative QCD, thereby allowing uncertainty estimates to be controlled by the smoothness of the interpolant. The Regge model of Gasser and Leutwyler, by contrast, relies on additional assumptions about the high-energy behavior. Because the present work is a review and does not contain new numerical calculations, it does not perform a fresh quantitative error propagation between the two models. We will revise the abstract and the relevant discussion paragraphs to state explicitly that the claimed advantage is qualitative and follows from the anchoring properties of the WLCM construction rather than from a new comparative analysis performed here. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

This is a review paper summarizing the Cottingham formula, its renormalization-induced QED-QCD mixing, and two existing subtraction-function models (Regge and WLCM interpolation). The central comparison—that the WLCM model yields more reliable uncertainty because both endpoints are anchored by rigorous external theoretical results—rests on standard dispersion-relation premises and does not introduce any new derivation, fitted parameter, or self-referential definition that reduces to the paper's own inputs by construction. Self-citation of the WLCM model is present but not load-bearing in a circular sense, as the paper presents no internal equations or uniqueness claims that collapse to that citation alone.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review, the discussion rests on the validity of the Cottingham formula itself and the necessity of modeling the subtraction function; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in this work.

free parameters (1)

subtraction function parameters
The abstract states that modeling of the subtraction function must be done to arrive at a numerical prediction; these parameters are fitted or chosen within the reviewed models.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The Cottingham formula provides a means of determining the QED corrections from the forward Compton Amplitude
Invoked as the starting point for the entire review.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1270 out tokens · 26050 ms · 2026-05-24T22:39:47.524921+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 29 internal anchors

[1]

W . N. Cottingham, The neutron proton mass difference and electron scattering experiments, Annals Phys. 25 (1963) 424

work page 1963
[2]

J. C. Collins, Renormalization of the Cottingham F ormula, Nucl. Phys. B149 (1979) 90

work page 1979
[3]

Manohar and H

A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model , Nucl. Phys. B234 (1984) 189

work page 1984
[4]

Weinberg, Electromagnetic and weak masses, Phys

S. Weinberg, Electromagnetic and weak masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29 (1972) 388

work page 1972
[5]

Heisenberg, Über den bau der atomkerne

W . Heisenberg, Über den bau der atomkerne. i , Zeitschrift für Physik 77 (1932) 1

work page 1932
[6]

E. E. Chambers and R. Hofstadter, Structure of the Proton, Phys. Rev. 103 (1956) 1454

work page 1956
[7]

M. R. Y earian and R. Hofstadter, Magnetic F orm Factor of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. 110 (1958) 552

work page 1958
[8]

R. P . Feynman and G. Speisman, Proton-Neutron Mass Difference, Phys. Rev. 94 (1954) 500

work page 1954
[9]

M. Cini, E. Ferrari and R. Gatto, Neutron-Proton Mass Difference by Dispersion Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1959) 7

work page 1959
[10]

L. K. Pande, Neutron-proton mass difference, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 26 (1962) 1063. 7 Cottingham and M p − Mn André Walker-Loud

work page 1955
[11]

de Vries, R

C. de Vries, R. Hofstadter and R. Herman, Neutron form factors and nucleon structure , Phys. Rev. Lett. 8 (1962) 381

work page 1962
[12]

Hofstadter and R

R. Hofstadter and R. Herman, Electric and Magnetic Structure of the Proton and Neutron , Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 (1961) 293

work page 1961
[13]

Bergia, A

S. Bergia, A. Stanghellini, S. Fubini and C. Villi, Electromagnetic F orm Factors of the Nucleon and Pion-Pion Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 (1961) 367

work page 1961
[14]

Harari, Superconvergent Dispersion Relations and Electromagnetic Mass Differences, Phys

H. Harari, Superconvergent Dispersion Relations and Electromagnetic Mass Differences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 (1966) 1303

work page 1966
[15]

S. R. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, Departures from the eightfold way: Theory of strong interac tion symmetry breakdown, Phys. Rev. 134 (1964) B671

work page 1964
[16]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Implications of Scaling for the Proton - Neutron Mass - Diffe rence, Nucl. Phys. B94 (1975) 269

work page 1975
[17]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Quark Masses, Phys. Rept. 87 (1982) 77

work page 1982
[18]

The Electromagnetic Self-Energy Contribution to M_p - M_n and the Isovector Nucleon Magnetic Polarizability

A. Walker-Loud, C. E. Carlson and G. A. Miller, The electromagnetic self-energy contribution to m p - mn and the isovector nucleon magnetic polarizability , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 232301 [1203.0254]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[19]

Cottingham formula for the electromagnetic self-energy contribution to M_p - M_n

A. Walker-Loud, C. E. Carlson and G. A. Miller, Cottingham formula for the electromagnetic self-energy contribution to M p − Mn, PoS LA TTICE2012(2012) 136 [ 1210.7777]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[20]

Baryons in/and Lattice QCD

A. Walker-Loud, Baryons in/and Lattice QCD , PoS CD12 (2013) 017 [1304.6341]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[21]

Nuclear Physics Review

A. Walker-Loud, Nuclear Physics Review, PoS LA TTICE2013(2014) 013 [1401.8259]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[22]

A. W . Thomas, X. G. Wang and R. D. Y oung, Electromagnetic Contribution to the Proton-Neutron Mass Splitting, Phys. Rev. C91 (2015) 015209 [ 1406.4579]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[23]

F. B. Erben, P . E. Shanahan, A. W . Thomas and R. D. Y oung, Dispersive estimate of the electromagnetic charge symmetry violation in the octet bar yon masses, Phys. Rev. C90 (2014) 065205 [1408.6628]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[24]

Gasser, M

J. Gasser, M. Hoferichter, H. Leutwyler and A. Rusetsky , Cottingham formula and nucleon polarisabilities, Eur . Phys. J.C75 (2015) 375 [1506.06747]

work page arXiv 2015
[25]

Theoretical aspects of Chiral Dynamics

H. Leutwyler, Theoretical aspects of Chiral Dynamics , PoS CD15 (2015) 022 [1510.07511]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[26]

Tomalak, Electromagnetic proton-neutron mass difference, 1810.02502

O. Tomalak, Electromagnetic proton-neutron mass difference, 1810.02502

work page arXiv
[27]

Towards a direct lattice calculation of m_d - m_u

A. Walker-Loud, T owards a direct lattice calculation of md − mu, PoS LA TTICE2010(2010) 243 [1011.4015]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[28]

S. R. Beane, K. Orginos and M. J. Savage, Strong-isospin violation in the neutron-proton mass difference from fully-dynamical lattice QCD and PQQCD , Nucl. Phys. B768 (2007) 38 [hep-lat/0605014]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[29]

Strong isospin breaking with twisted mass lattice QCD

A. Walker-Loud, Strong isospin breaking with twisted mass lattice QCD , 0904.2404

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[30]

G. M. de Divitiis et al., Isospin breaking effects due to the up-down mass difference in Lattice QCD , JHEP 04 (2012) 124 [1110.6294]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[31]

QCDSF, UKQCD collaboration, Isospin breaking in octet baryon mass splittings , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 114511 [ 1206.3156]. 8 Cottingham and M p − Mn André Walker-Loud

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[32]

RM123 collaboration, Leading isospin breaking effects on the lattice , Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 114505 [1303.4896]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[33]

D. A. Brantley, B. Joo, E. V . Mastropas, E. Mereghetti, H . Monge-Camacho, B. C. Tiburzi et al., Strong isospin violation and chiral logarithms in the baryo n spectrum, 1612.07733

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[34]

Quantifying the sensitivity of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis to isospin breaking with input from lattice QCD

M. Heffernan, P . Banerjee and A. Walker-Loud, Quantifying the sensitivity of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis to isospin breaking with input from lattic e QCD, 1706.04991

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[35]

T. Blum, R. Zhou, T. Doi, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, S. Uno et al., Electromagnetic mass splittings of the low lying hadrons and quark masses from 2+1 ﬂavor lattice QCD+QED, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 094508 [1006.1311]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[36]

B UDAPEST -M ARSEILLE -W UPPERTAL collaboration, Isospin splittings in the light baryon octet from lattice QCD and QED , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 252001 [ 1306.2287]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[37]

Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference

S. Borsanyi et al., Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass differenc e, Science 347 (2015) 1452 [1406.4088]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[38]

Isospin splittings of meson and baryon masses from three-flavor lattice QCD + QED

R. Horsley et al., Isospin splittings of meson and baryon masses from three-ﬂa vor lattice QCD + QED, J. Phys. G43 (2016) 10LT02 [1508.06401]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[39]

C. G. Callan, Jr. and D. J. Gross, High-energy electroproduction and the constitution of the electric current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (1969) 156

work page 1969
[40]

R. J. Hill and G. Paz, Nucleon spin-averaged forward virtual Compton tensor at la rge Q2, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 094017 [ 1611.09917]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[41]

G. A. Miller, Nucleon charge symmetry breaking and parity violating elec tron proton scattering, Phys. Rev. C57 (1998) 1492 [ nucl-th/9711036]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[42]

Charge Symmetry Breaking and Parity Violating Electron-Proton Scattering

M. Wagman and G. A. Miller, Charge Symmetry Breaking and Parity Violating Electron-Proton Scattering, Phys. Rev. C89 (2014) 065206 [ 1402.7169]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[43]

On the definition of schemes for computing leading order isospin breaking corrections

A. Bussone, M. Della Morte, T. Janowski and A. Walker-Lo ud, On the deﬁnition of schemes for computing leading order isospin breaking corrections , PoS LA TTICE2018(2018) 293 [1810.11647]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[44]

Pachucki, Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen , Phys

K. Pachucki, Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen , Phys. Rev. A53 (1996) 2092

work page 1996
[45]

Leading Chiral Logarithms to the Hyperfine Splitting of the Hydrogen and Muonic Hydrogen

A. Pineda, Leading chiral logs to the hyperﬁne splitting of the hydroge n and muonic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. C67 (2003) 025201 [ hep-ph/0210210]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[46]

The chiral structure of the Lamb shift and the definition of the proton radius

A. Pineda, The Chiral structure of the Lamb shift and the deﬁnition of th e proton radius, Phys. Rev. C71 (2005) 065205 [ hep-ph/0412142]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[47]

C. E. Carlson and M. V anderhaeghen, Higher order proton structure corrections to the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A84 (2011) 020102 [ 1101.5965]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[48]

R. J. Hill and G. Paz, Model independent analysis of proton structure for hydroge nic bound states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 160402 [ 1103.4617]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[49]

H. W . Griesshammer, J. A. McGovern, D. R. Phillips and G. Feldman, Using effective ﬁeld theory to analyse low-energy Compton scattering data from protons an d light nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 841 [1203.6834]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[50]

M. C. Birse and J. A. McGovern, Proton polarisability contribution to the Lamb shift in muo nic hydrogen at fourth order in chiral perturbation theory , Eur . Phys. J.A48 (2012) 120 [1206.3030]. 9

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[1] [1]

W . N. Cottingham, The neutron proton mass difference and electron scattering experiments, Annals Phys. 25 (1963) 424

work page 1963

[2] [2]

J. C. Collins, Renormalization of the Cottingham F ormula, Nucl. Phys. B149 (1979) 90

work page 1979

[3] [3]

Manohar and H

A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model , Nucl. Phys. B234 (1984) 189

work page 1984

[4] [4]

Weinberg, Electromagnetic and weak masses, Phys

S. Weinberg, Electromagnetic and weak masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29 (1972) 388

work page 1972

[5] [5]

Heisenberg, Über den bau der atomkerne

W . Heisenberg, Über den bau der atomkerne. i , Zeitschrift für Physik 77 (1932) 1

work page 1932

[6] [6]

E. E. Chambers and R. Hofstadter, Structure of the Proton, Phys. Rev. 103 (1956) 1454

work page 1956

[7] [7]

M. R. Y earian and R. Hofstadter, Magnetic F orm Factor of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. 110 (1958) 552

work page 1958

[8] [8]

R. P . Feynman and G. Speisman, Proton-Neutron Mass Difference, Phys. Rev. 94 (1954) 500

work page 1954

[9] [9]

M. Cini, E. Ferrari and R. Gatto, Neutron-Proton Mass Difference by Dispersion Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1959) 7

work page 1959

[10] [10]

L. K. Pande, Neutron-proton mass difference, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 26 (1962) 1063. 7 Cottingham and M p − Mn André Walker-Loud

work page 1955

[11] [11]

de Vries, R

C. de Vries, R. Hofstadter and R. Herman, Neutron form factors and nucleon structure , Phys. Rev. Lett. 8 (1962) 381

work page 1962

[12] [12]

Hofstadter and R

R. Hofstadter and R. Herman, Electric and Magnetic Structure of the Proton and Neutron , Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 (1961) 293

work page 1961

[13] [13]

Bergia, A

S. Bergia, A. Stanghellini, S. Fubini and C. Villi, Electromagnetic F orm Factors of the Nucleon and Pion-Pion Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 (1961) 367

work page 1961

[14] [14]

Harari, Superconvergent Dispersion Relations and Electromagnetic Mass Differences, Phys

H. Harari, Superconvergent Dispersion Relations and Electromagnetic Mass Differences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 (1966) 1303

work page 1966

[15] [15]

S. R. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, Departures from the eightfold way: Theory of strong interac tion symmetry breakdown, Phys. Rev. 134 (1964) B671

work page 1964

[16] [16]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Implications of Scaling for the Proton - Neutron Mass - Diffe rence, Nucl. Phys. B94 (1975) 269

work page 1975

[17] [17]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Quark Masses, Phys. Rept. 87 (1982) 77

work page 1982

[18] [18]

The Electromagnetic Self-Energy Contribution to M_p - M_n and the Isovector Nucleon Magnetic Polarizability

A. Walker-Loud, C. E. Carlson and G. A. Miller, The electromagnetic self-energy contribution to m p - mn and the isovector nucleon magnetic polarizability , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 232301 [1203.0254]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[19] [19]

Cottingham formula for the electromagnetic self-energy contribution to M_p - M_n

A. Walker-Loud, C. E. Carlson and G. A. Miller, Cottingham formula for the electromagnetic self-energy contribution to M p − Mn, PoS LA TTICE2012(2012) 136 [ 1210.7777]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[20] [20]

Baryons in/and Lattice QCD

A. Walker-Loud, Baryons in/and Lattice QCD , PoS CD12 (2013) 017 [1304.6341]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[21] [21]

Nuclear Physics Review

A. Walker-Loud, Nuclear Physics Review, PoS LA TTICE2013(2014) 013 [1401.8259]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[22] [22]

A. W . Thomas, X. G. Wang and R. D. Y oung, Electromagnetic Contribution to the Proton-Neutron Mass Splitting, Phys. Rev. C91 (2015) 015209 [ 1406.4579]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[23] [23]

F. B. Erben, P . E. Shanahan, A. W . Thomas and R. D. Y oung, Dispersive estimate of the electromagnetic charge symmetry violation in the octet bar yon masses, Phys. Rev. C90 (2014) 065205 [1408.6628]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[24] [24]

Gasser, M

J. Gasser, M. Hoferichter, H. Leutwyler and A. Rusetsky , Cottingham formula and nucleon polarisabilities, Eur . Phys. J.C75 (2015) 375 [1506.06747]

work page arXiv 2015

[25] [25]

Theoretical aspects of Chiral Dynamics

H. Leutwyler, Theoretical aspects of Chiral Dynamics , PoS CD15 (2015) 022 [1510.07511]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[26] [26]

Tomalak, Electromagnetic proton-neutron mass difference, 1810.02502

O. Tomalak, Electromagnetic proton-neutron mass difference, 1810.02502

work page arXiv

[27] [27]

Towards a direct lattice calculation of m_d - m_u

A. Walker-Loud, T owards a direct lattice calculation of md − mu, PoS LA TTICE2010(2010) 243 [1011.4015]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[28] [28]

S. R. Beane, K. Orginos and M. J. Savage, Strong-isospin violation in the neutron-proton mass difference from fully-dynamical lattice QCD and PQQCD , Nucl. Phys. B768 (2007) 38 [hep-lat/0605014]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[29] [29]

Strong isospin breaking with twisted mass lattice QCD

A. Walker-Loud, Strong isospin breaking with twisted mass lattice QCD , 0904.2404

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[30] [30]

G. M. de Divitiis et al., Isospin breaking effects due to the up-down mass difference in Lattice QCD , JHEP 04 (2012) 124 [1110.6294]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[31] [31]

QCDSF, UKQCD collaboration, Isospin breaking in octet baryon mass splittings , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 114511 [ 1206.3156]. 8 Cottingham and M p − Mn André Walker-Loud

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[32] [32]

RM123 collaboration, Leading isospin breaking effects on the lattice , Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 114505 [1303.4896]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[33] [33]

D. A. Brantley, B. Joo, E. V . Mastropas, E. Mereghetti, H . Monge-Camacho, B. C. Tiburzi et al., Strong isospin violation and chiral logarithms in the baryo n spectrum, 1612.07733

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[34] [34]

Quantifying the sensitivity of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis to isospin breaking with input from lattice QCD

M. Heffernan, P . Banerjee and A. Walker-Loud, Quantifying the sensitivity of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis to isospin breaking with input from lattic e QCD, 1706.04991

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[35] [35]

T. Blum, R. Zhou, T. Doi, M. Hayakawa, T. Izubuchi, S. Uno et al., Electromagnetic mass splittings of the low lying hadrons and quark masses from 2+1 ﬂavor lattice QCD+QED, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 094508 [1006.1311]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[36] [36]

B UDAPEST -M ARSEILLE -W UPPERTAL collaboration, Isospin splittings in the light baryon octet from lattice QCD and QED , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 252001 [ 1306.2287]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[37] [37]

Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference

S. Borsanyi et al., Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass differenc e, Science 347 (2015) 1452 [1406.4088]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[38] [38]

Isospin splittings of meson and baryon masses from three-flavor lattice QCD + QED

R. Horsley et al., Isospin splittings of meson and baryon masses from three-ﬂa vor lattice QCD + QED, J. Phys. G43 (2016) 10LT02 [1508.06401]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[39] [39]

C. G. Callan, Jr. and D. J. Gross, High-energy electroproduction and the constitution of the electric current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (1969) 156

work page 1969

[40] [40]

R. J. Hill and G. Paz, Nucleon spin-averaged forward virtual Compton tensor at la rge Q2, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 094017 [ 1611.09917]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[41] [41]

G. A. Miller, Nucleon charge symmetry breaking and parity violating elec tron proton scattering, Phys. Rev. C57 (1998) 1492 [ nucl-th/9711036]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[42] [42]

Charge Symmetry Breaking and Parity Violating Electron-Proton Scattering

M. Wagman and G. A. Miller, Charge Symmetry Breaking and Parity Violating Electron-Proton Scattering, Phys. Rev. C89 (2014) 065206 [ 1402.7169]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[43] [43]

On the definition of schemes for computing leading order isospin breaking corrections

A. Bussone, M. Della Morte, T. Janowski and A. Walker-Lo ud, On the deﬁnition of schemes for computing leading order isospin breaking corrections , PoS LA TTICE2018(2018) 293 [1810.11647]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[44] [44]

Pachucki, Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen , Phys

K. Pachucki, Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen , Phys. Rev. A53 (1996) 2092

work page 1996

[45] [45]

Leading Chiral Logarithms to the Hyperfine Splitting of the Hydrogen and Muonic Hydrogen

A. Pineda, Leading chiral logs to the hyperﬁne splitting of the hydroge n and muonic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. C67 (2003) 025201 [ hep-ph/0210210]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[46] [46]

The chiral structure of the Lamb shift and the definition of the proton radius

A. Pineda, The Chiral structure of the Lamb shift and the deﬁnition of th e proton radius, Phys. Rev. C71 (2005) 065205 [ hep-ph/0412142]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

[47] [47]

C. E. Carlson and M. V anderhaeghen, Higher order proton structure corrections to the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A84 (2011) 020102 [ 1101.5965]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[48] [48]

R. J. Hill and G. Paz, Model independent analysis of proton structure for hydroge nic bound states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 160402 [ 1103.4617]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[49] [49]

H. W . Griesshammer, J. A. McGovern, D. R. Phillips and G. Feldman, Using effective ﬁeld theory to analyse low-energy Compton scattering data from protons an d light nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 841 [1203.6834]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[50] [50]

M. C. Birse and J. A. McGovern, Proton polarisability contribution to the Lamb shift in muo nic hydrogen at fourth order in chiral perturbation theory , Eur . Phys. J.A48 (2012) 120 [1206.3030]. 9

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012