pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08542 · v1 · pith:QY4RP6CJnew · submitted 2019-07-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.SR

Numerical Methods for Simulating Star Formation

Romain Teyssier , Benoit Commercon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords star formationmagnetohydrodynamicssink particlessupersonic turbulencenumerical methodsnon-ideal MHDdivergence-free magnetic field
0
0 comments X

The pith

Star formation simulations require sink particles and divergence-free MHD schemes to handle supersonic turbulence and gravitational collapse in self-gravitating gas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews numerical techniques for ideal and non-ideal MHD applied to star formation. It explains that environments with supersonic and super-Alfvenic turbulence in radiative self-gravitating fluids create severe demands on code robustness. Because direct resolution of collapsing cores is limited, the work centers on sink particle methods that use sub-grid models for accretion, momentum, energy, and ejection via radiation and jets. Discretization choices such as smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite volume methods are examined, with repeated stress on preserving a divergence-free magnetic field and controlling numerical diffusion at the grid scale. Strategies for non-ideal effects including Ohmic diffusion, ambipolar diffusion, and the Hall effect are also presented, along with time-stepping solutions for their restrictive scales.

Core claim

Star forming environments dominated by supersonic and super-Alfvenic turbulence in a radiative, self-gravitating fluid impose severe restrictions on numerical codes; resolution limits therefore require sink particle techniques with sub-grid models for proto-star accretion and ejection, while discretization methods must maintain a divergence-free magnetic field and manage truncation errors that set the level of numerical viscosity and resistivity.

What carries the argument

Sink particle techniques with sub-grid models for mass, momentum, energy accretion and ejection rates, paired with divergence-free preserving discretizations for both ideal and non-ideal MHD.

If this is right

  • Numerical diffusion arising from truncation error directly controls the effective viscosity and resistivity and can alter simulation outcomes in MHD turbulence.
  • Non-ideal MHD terms such as ambipolar diffusion and the Hall effect impose severe time-step restrictions that require dedicated integration strategies.
  • Different discretizations (SPH versus finite volume) must be compared on the same turbulence and collapse problems to isolate effects of numerical diffusion.
  • Sub-grid prescriptions for jets and radiative feedback from sinks determine the final stellar mass distribution and outflow properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If higher resolution eventually removes the need for sinks, the same MHD infrastructure could be reused for direct core formation studies in other collapse regimes.
  • The emphasis on divergence-free preservation suggests that magnetic field topology errors may dominate over other truncation effects in long turbulence runs.
  • Time-stepping solutions developed for non-ideal terms could transfer to other stiff source-term problems in astrophysical fluid codes.

Load-bearing premise

Resolution limitations force the use of sink particle techniques with sub-grid models rather than attempting to resolve the formation of the first and second Larson cores directly.

What would settle it

A simulation that fully resolves the first and second Larson cores without sink particles and produces statistically consistent star formation outcomes would show whether sub-grid models remain necessary.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08542 by Benoit Commercon, Romain Teyssier.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic showing the geometry of a Cartesian cell in the Constrained Transport approach. The finite volume cell is shown as a grey cube. It is labelled i, j, k. The magnetic field components are defined perpendicular to the faces of the cube. The are shown in red, only in the rightermost face in all three directions. The electric field components are defined on the cell edges. They are shown in blue and o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SPH calculations of dust dynamics during the collapse of a 1 M dense core. The left column shows the gas column density (edge-on view) and from left to right, the three other columns show the dust column density for dust grain sizes of 10 µm, 100 µm, and 1 mm. Large dust grains decouple from the gas and settle in the mid-plane faster into a large dusty disc with larger dust-to-gas ratio than in the envelop… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Volume rendering from collapsing 1 M dense cores at the protostellar core scale. The left panel shows the results of an ideal MHD 3D simulations, and the right panel the comparison with non-ideal MHD including ambipolar diffusion and Ohmic diffusion. The color lines indicate the 3D magnetic field lines, and the color coding the magnetic field amplitude. Figure reproduced from Vaytet et al. (2018) with perm… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulation of the Milky Way: column density of the gas disc in a sub-parsec resolution simulation. The colour table only applies to the main panel: the table has been changed in each zoom-in view to enhance contrast. Figure adapted from Renaud et al. (2013) with permission from the authors. Later, Hopkins et al. (2014) wrapped their implementation of feedback in the FIRE (Feedback In Realistic Environments… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulation of protostellar disk formation within molecular clouds. The column density maps show the entire molecular (upper left panel) and successive zoom within a star-forming dense core. Figure adapted from Zhang et al. (2018) with permission from the authors. This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article 40 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We review the numerical techniques for ideal and non-ideal magneto-hydrodynamics (MHD) used in the context of star formation simulations. We outline the specific challenges offered by modeling star forming environments, which are dominated by supersonic and super-Alfvenic turbulence in a radiative, self-gravitating fluid. These conditions are rather unique in physics and engineering and pose particularly severe restrictions on the robustness and accuracy of numerical codes. One striking aspect is the formation of collapsing fluid elements leading to the formation of singularities that represent point-like objects, namely the proto-stars. Although a few studies have attempted to resolve the formation of the first and second Larson cores, resolution limitations force us to use sink particle techniques, with sub-grid models to compute the accretion rates of mass, momentum and energy, as well as their ejection rate due to radiation and jets from the proto-stars. We discuss the most popular discretisation techniques used in the community, namely smoothed particle hydrodynamics, finite difference and finite volume methods, stressing the importance to maintain a divergence-free magnetic field. We discuss how to estimate the truncation error of a given numerical scheme, and its importance in setting the magnitude of the numerical diffusion. This can have a strong impact on the outcome of these MHD simulations, where both viscosity and resistivity are implemented at the grid scale. We then present various numerical techniques to model non-ideal MHD effects, such as Ohmic and ambipolar diffusion, as well as the Hall effect. These important physical ingredients are posing strong challenges in term of resolution and time stepping. For the latter, several strategies are discussed to overcome the limitations due to prohibitively small time steps (abridged).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews numerical techniques for ideal and non-ideal MHD simulations of star formation. It outlines challenges from supersonic, super-Alfvénic turbulence in radiative, self-gravitating fluids, the formation of singularities modeled via sink particles with sub-grid accretion/ejection models, discretization approaches (SPH, finite-difference, finite-volume) with emphasis on divergence-free magnetic fields, truncation-error estimation and its link to numerical diffusion, and methods for non-ideal effects (Ohmic/ambipolar diffusion, Hall effect) together with time-stepping strategies to handle restrictive CFL conditions.

Significance. If accurate and comprehensive, the review consolidates established practices and limitations for a specialized regime of astrophysical MHD. It can usefully guide code selection and highlight the role of numerical diffusion at grid scale. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or new falsifiable predictions are presented; the discussion of sub-grid sink modeling and divergence cleaning is a standard strength of such surveys.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the text ends with '(abridged)', which leaves the discussion of time-stepping strategies incomplete in the provided version; the full manuscript should ensure this section is fully expanded.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept. The report contains no major comments requiring specific responses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; literature review with no load-bearing derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper summarizing established numerical techniques for ideal and non-ideal MHD in star formation. It states challenges from supersonic turbulence and resolution limits but advances no new empirical result, derivation, prediction, or quantitative claim. No equations or steps reduce by construction to inputs, fitted parameters, or self-citations. The work is self-contained as a survey of prior methods and does not rely on any uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or renaming that could introduce circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper the work introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it summarizes prior literature on numerical methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5833 in / 986 out tokens · 22954 ms · 2026-05-24T18:50:25.139471+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence

    Mac Low MM, Klessen RS. Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence. Reviews of Modern Physics 76 (2004) 125–194. McKee CF, Ostriker EC. Theory of Star Formation. Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys.45 (2007) 565–687. McKee CF. Photoionization-regulated star formation and the structure of molecular clouds. Astrophysical Journal 345 (1989) 782–801. Federrat...

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Rarefaction Shocks, Shock Errors, and Low Order of Accuracy in ZEUS

    Falle SAEG. Rarefaction Shocks, Shock Errors, and Low Order of Accuracy in ZEUS. The Astrophysical Journal 577 (2002) L123–L126. Dai W, Woodward PR. Extension of the Piecewise Parabolic Method to Multidimensional Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 115 (1994) 485–514. Ryu D, Jones TW, Frank A. Numerical Magnetohydrodynamics in Ast...

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15167.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.398..607V 398, 607

    T´oth G. A General Code for Modeling MHD Flows on Parallel Computers: Versatile Advection Code. Astrophysical Letters and Communications 34 (1996) 245–. Balsara DS. Total Variation Diminishing Scheme for Adiabatic and Isothermal Magnetohydrodynamics. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 116 (1998) 133–153. Lee D, Deane AE. An unsplit staggered mesh...

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15181.x 1996

  4. [4]

    A constrained transport scheme for MHD on unstructured static and moving meshes

    Mocz P, V ogelsberger M, Hernquist L. A constrained transport scheme for MHD on unstructured static and moving meshes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (2014a) 43–55. Brandenburg A, Subramanian K. Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory. Physics Reports 417 (2005) 1–209. Balbus SA, Hawley JF. A powerful local shear in...

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    FLASH: An Adaptive Mesh Hydrodynamics Code for Modeling Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes

    Fryxell B, Olson K, Ricker P, Timmes FX, Zingale M, Lamb DQ, et al. FLASH: An Adaptive Mesh Hydrodynamics Code for Modeling Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 131 (2000) 273–334. Mignone A, Bodo G, Massaglia S, Matsakos T, Tesileanu O, Zanni C, et al. PLUTO: A Numerical Code for Computational Astrophysics. The...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078591 2000

  6. [6]

    Magnetic Fields in Population III Star Formation

    Turk MJ, Oishi JS, Abel T, Bryan GL. Magnetic Fields in Population III Star Formation. The Astrophysical Journal 745 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Divergence-Free Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Magnetohydrodynamics

    Balsara DS. Divergence-Free Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Magnetohydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 174 (2001) 614–648. T´oth G, Roe PL. Divergence- and Curl-Preserving Prolongation and Restriction Formulas. Journal of Computational Physics 180 (2002) 736–750. Jiang GS, Wu Cc. A High-Order WENO Finite Difference Scheme for the Equations of Idea...

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Marchand P, Masson J, Chabrier G, Hennebelle P, Commerc ¸on B, Vaytet N

    doi:10.3389/fspas.2018.00039. Marchand P, Masson J, Chabrier G, Hennebelle P, Commerc ¸on B, Vaytet N. Chemical solver to compute molecule and grain abundances and non-ideal MHD resistivities in prestellar core-collapse calculations. A&A 592 (2016) A18. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526780. Tsukamoto Y , Iwasaki K, Okuzumi S, Machida MN, Inutsuka S. BIMODALITY...

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2018.00039 2018

  9. [9]

    Tomida K, Okuzumi S, Machida MN

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/6. Tomida K, Okuzumi S, Machida MN. Radiation magnetohydrodynamic simulations of protostellar collapse: Nonideal magnetohydrodynamic effects and early formation of circumstellar disks.Astrophysical Journal 801 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/6 2015

  10. [10]

    Frontiers 45 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Vaytet N, Commerc ¸on B, Masson J, Gonz´alez M, Chabrier G

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/117. Frontiers 45 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Vaytet N, Commerc ¸on B, Masson J, Gonz´alez M, Chabrier G. Protostellar birth with ambipolar and ohmic diffusion. A&A 615 (2018) A5. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732075. Koga S, Tsukamoto Y , Okuzumi S, Machida MN. Dependence of Hall coefficient on grain ...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/117 2018

  11. [11]

    Bonafede A, Dolag K, Stasyszyn F, Murante G, Borgani S

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/24. Bonafede A, Dolag K, Stasyszyn F, Murante G, Borgani S. A non-ideal magnetohydrodynamic GADGET: simulating massive galaxy clusters. MNRAS 418 (2011) 2234–2250. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011. 19523.x. Matsumoto T. An Implicit Scheme for Ohmic Dissipation with Adaptive Mesh Refinement. Publications of the Astronomical Society o...

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/24 2011

  12. [12]

    T., Ogilvie G

    Hosking JG, Whitworth aP. Modelling ambipolar diffusion with two-fluid smoothed particle hydrodynamics. October 1000 (2004) 994–1000. Duffin DF, Pudritz RE. Simulating hydromagnetic processes in star formation: Introducing ambipolar diffusion into an adaptive mesh refinement code.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 391 (2008) 1659–1673. doi:10....

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14026.x 2004

  13. [13]

    Chen CY , Ostriker EC

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/144. Chen CY , Ostriker EC. Formation of Magnetized Prestellar Cores with Ambipolar Diffusion and Turbulence. ApJ 785 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/2/144 2014

  14. [14]

    Wurster J, Price D, Ayliffe B

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/69. Wurster J, Price D, Ayliffe B. Ambipolar diffusion in smoothed particle magnetohydrodynamics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444 (2014) 1104–1112. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1524. Padoan P, Zweibel E, Nordlund ˚A. Ambipolar Drift Heating in Turbulent Molecular Clouds. ApJ 540 (2000) 332–341. doi:10.1086/309299....

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/1/69 2014

  15. [15]

    Oishi JS, Mac Low MM

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8a99. Oishi JS, Mac Low MM. The Inability of Ambipolar Diffusion to Set a Characteristic Mass Scale in Molecular Clouds. ApJ 638 (2006) 281–285. doi:10.1086/498818. Li PS, McKee CF, Klein RI. The Heavy-Ion Approximation for Ambipolar Diffusion Calculations for Weakly Ionized Plasmas. ApJ 653 (2006) 1280–1291. doi:10.1086/508977. Me...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8a99 2006

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4780-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4780-4

  17. [17]

    Disk formation in magnetized clouds enabled by the hall effect

    Krasnopolsky R, Li ZY , Shang H. Disk formation in magnetized clouds enabled by the hall effect. Astrophysical Journal 733 (2011) 1–6. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/54. Frontiers 47 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Falle S. A numerical scheme for multifluid magnetohydrodynamics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 344...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/733/1/54 2011

  18. [18]

    T´oth G, Ma Y , Gombosi TI

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/137. T´oth G, Ma Y , Gombosi TI. Hall magnetohydrodynamics on block-adaptive grids. Journal of Computational Physics 227 (2008) 6967–6984. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2008.04.010. T´oth G, De Zeeuw DL, Gombosi TI, Powell KG. A parallel explicit/implicit time stepping scheme on block-adaptive grids. Journal of Computational Physics 217 (2...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/791/2/137 2008

  19. [19]

    Impact of the Hall effect in star formation and the issue of angular momentum conservation

    Lesur G, Kunz MW, Fromang S. Thanatology in protoplanetary discs. The combined influence of Ohmic, Hall, and ambipolar diffusion on dead zones. A&A 566 (2014) A56. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423660. Marchand P, Commerc ¸on B, Chabrier G. Impact of the Hall effect in star formation and the issue of angular momentum conservation. eprint arXiv:1808.08731 37 (20...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423660 2014

  20. [20]

    Li ZY , Krasnopolsky R, Shang H

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psx113. Li ZY , Krasnopolsky R, Shang H. Non-Ideal Mhd Effects and Magnetic Braking Catastrophe in Protostellar Disk Formation. The Astrophysical Journal 738 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx113 2011

  21. [21]

    Hopkins PF

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/738/2/180. Hopkins PF. Anisotropic diffusion in mesh-free numerical magnetohydrodynamics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 466 (2017) 3387–3405. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3306. Gonz´alez-Morales P, Khomenko E, Downes T, De Vicente A. MHDSTS: A new explicit numerical scheme for simulations of partially ionised solar plasma...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/2/180 2017

  22. [22]

    Epstein PS

    doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/756/2/168. Epstein PS. On the Resistance Experienced by Spheres in their Motion through Gases. Physical Review 23 (1924) 710–733. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.23.710. Bate MR, Lor´en-Aguilar P. On the dynamics of dust during protostellar collapse. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2017) 1089–1094. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw28...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.23.710 1924

  23. [23]

    Chen JW, Lin MK

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa92cd. Chen JW, Lin MK. Dusty disc-planet interaction with dust-free simulations. MNRAS 478 (2018) 2737–2752. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1166. Hopkins PF, Lee H. The fundamentally different dynamics of dust and gas in molecular clouds. MNRAS 456 (2016) 4174–4190. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2745. Tricco TS, Price DJ, Laibe G. Is the dust-to-gas ...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa92cd 2018

  24. [24]

    Adaptive ray tracing for radiative transfer around point sources

    Abel T, Wandelt BD. Adaptive ray tracing for radiative transfer around point sources. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 330 (2002) L53–L56. Frontiers 49 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Wise JH, Abel T. ENZO+MORAY: radiation hydrodynamics adaptive mesh refinement simulations with adaptive ray tracing. Monthly Noti...

    work page 2002

  25. [25]

    Lampray: Multi-group long characteristics ray tracing for adaptive mesh radiation hydrodynamics

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/50. Shima K, Tasker EJ, Habe A. Does feedback help or hinder star formation? The effect of photoionization on star formation in giant molecular clouds. MNRAS 467 (2017) 512–523. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3279. Altay G, Croft RAC, Pelupessy I. SPHRAY: a smoothed particle hydrodynamics ray tracer for radiative transfer. Monthly Notice...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/50 2017

  26. [26]

    C 2-ray: A new method for photon-conserving transport of ionizing radiation

    Mellema G, Iliev IT, Alvarez MA, Shapiro PR. C 2-ray: A new method for photon-conserving transport of ionizing radiation. New Astronomy 11 (2006) 374–395. Ercolano B, Barlow MJ, Storey PJ, Liu XW. MOCASSIN: a fully three-dimensional Monte Carlo photoionization code. Monthly Notice of the Royal Astronomical Society 340 (2003) 1136–1152. Harries TJ. An algo...

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Dynamic Monte Carlo radiation transfer in SPH: radiation pressure force implementation

    Nayakshin S, Cha SH, Hobbs A. Dynamic Monte Carlo radiation transfer in SPH: radiation pressure force implementation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 397 (2009) 1314–1325. Lomax O, Whitworth AP. SPAMCART: a code for smoothed particle Monte Carlo radiative transfer. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (2016) 3542–3551. M...

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    TreeCol: a novel approach to estimating column densities in astrophysical simulations

    Clark PC, Glover SCO, Klessen RS. TreeCol: a novel approach to estimating column densities in astrophysical simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 420 (2012) 745–756. This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article 50 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Dubroca B, Feugeas J. Etude th ´eorique et num´...

    work page doi:10.1016/s0764-4442(00)87499-6 2012

  29. [29]

    AREPO-RT: Radiation hydrodynamics on a moving mesh

    Kannan R, V ogelsberger M, Marinacci F, McKinnon R, Pakmor R, Springel V . AREPO-RT: Radiation hydrodynamics on a moving mesh. arXiv (2018) arXiv:1804.01987. Minerbo GN. Maximum entropy Eddington factors. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 20 (1978) 541–545. doi:10.1016/0022-4073(78)90024-9. Levermore CD. Relating Eddington factor...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0022-4073(78)90024-9 2018

  30. [30]

    A fast, robust, and simple implicit method for adaptive time-stepping on adaptive mesh-refinement grids.Astronomy and Astrophysics 563 (2014) A11

    Commercon B, Debout V , Teyssier R. A fast, robust, and simple implicit method for adaptive time-stepping on adaptive mesh-refinement grids.Astronomy and Astrophysics 563 (2014) A11. Shestakov AI, Offner SSR. A multigroup diffusion solver using pseudo transient continuation for a radiation-hydrodynamic code with patch-based AMR. Journal of Computational Ph...

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Multigroup radiation hydrodynamics with flux-limited diffusion and adaptive mesh refinement.Astronomy and Astrophysics 578 (2015) A12

    Gonz´alez M, Vaytet N, Commercon B, Masson J. Multigroup radiation hydrodynamics with flux-limited diffusion and adaptive mesh refinement.Astronomy and Astrophysics 578 (2015) A12. Kuiper R, Kuiper R, Klahr H, Klahr H, Dullemond C, Dullemond C, et al. Fast and accurate frequency- dependent radiation transport for hydrodynamics simulations in massive star fo...

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    A General Hybrid Radiation Transport Scheme for Star Formation Simulations on an Adaptive Grid

    Klassen M, Kuiper R, Pudritz RE, Peters T, Banerjee R, Buntemeyer L. A General Hybrid Radiation Transport Scheme for Star Formation Simulations on an Adaptive Grid. The Astrophysical Journal 797 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Frontiers 51 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Whitehouse SC, Bate MR

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/4. Frontiers 51 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Whitehouse SC, Bate MR. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics with radiative transfer in the flux-limited diffusion approximation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 353 (2004) 1078–1094. Whitehouse SC, Bate MR, Monaghan JJ. A faster algorithm f...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/797/1/4 2004

  34. [34]

    Galli D, Walmsley M, Gon c ¸alves J

    doi:10.1093/mnras/145.3.271. Galli D, Walmsley M, Gon c ¸alves J. The structure and stability of molecular cloud cores in external radiation fields. Astronomy and Astrophysics 394 (2002) 275–284. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021125. Tsitali AE, Belloche A, Commer c ¸on B, Menten KM. The dynamical state of the first hydrostatic core candidate Chamaeleon-MMS1. A&A...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/145.3.271 2002

  35. [35]

    First Core Properties: From Low- to High-mass Star Formation

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/838/1/60. Stahler SW, Shu FH, Taam RE. The evolution of protostars. I - Global formulation and results.Astrophysical Journal 241 (1980) 637–654. doi:10.1086/158377. Winkler KHA, Newman MJ. Formation of solar-type stars in spherical symmetry. I - The key role of the accretion shock. Astrophysical Journal 236 (1980) 201–211. doi:10.108...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/838/1/60 1980

  36. [36]

    Norman ML, Winkler KHA

    doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90095-X. Norman ML, Winkler KHA. 2-D Eulerian Hydrodynamics with Fluid Interfaces, Self-Gravity and Rotation. Winkler KHA, Norman ML, editors, NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series C (1986), vol. 188,

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90095-x 1986

  37. [37]

    Second Core Formation and High-Speed Jets: Resistive Magnetohydrodynamic Nested Grid Simulations

    Machida MN, Inutsuka Si, Matsumoto T. Second Core Formation and High-Speed Jets: Resistive Magnetohydrodynamic Nested Grid Simulations. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 2 (2006) 151–154. doi:10.1086/507179;. Banerjee R, Pudritz RE. Outflows and jets from collapsing magnetized cloud cores. The Astrophysical Journal 641 (2006) 949–960. doi:10.1086/500496. B...

    work page doi:10.1086/507179 2006

  38. [38]

    doi:10.1086/192204. Bate MR. Collapse of a molecular cloud core to stellar densities: The radiative impact of stellar core formation on the circumstellar disc. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 404 (2010) 79–83. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00839.x. Bate MR, Burkert A. Resolution requirements for smoothed particle hydrodynamics ca...

    work page doi:10.1086/192204 2010

  39. [39]

    Bate MR, Tricco TS, Price DJ

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/97. Bate MR, Tricco TS, Price DJ. Collapse of a molecular cloud core to stellar densities: stellar-core and outflow formation in radiation magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (2014) 77–95. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1865. Tsukamoto Y , Iwasaki K, Okuzumi S, Machida MN, Inutsuka S. Eff...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/97 2014

  40. [40]

    Lee AT, Cunningham AJ, McKee CF, Klein RI

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/40. Lee AT, Cunningham AJ, McKee CF, Klein RI. Bondi-Hoyle Accretion in an Isothermal Magnetized Plasma. The Astrophysical Journal 783 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/730/1/40 2014

  41. [41]

    Greif TH, Springel V , White SD, Glover SC, Clark PC, Smith RJ, et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/50. Greif TH, Springel V , White SD, Glover SC, Clark PC, Smith RJ, et al. Simulations on a moving mesh: The clustered formation of population III protostars. Astrophysical Journal 737 (2011). doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/737/2/75. Price DJ, Bate MR. The effect of magnetic fields on star cluster formation. Monthly Notices of the Royal...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/1/50 2011

  42. [42]

    Li PS, Klein RI, McKee CF

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/156. Li PS, Klein RI, McKee CF. Formation of stellar clusters in magnetized, filamentary infrared dark clouds. MNRAS 473 (2018) 4220–4241. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2611. Zhao B, Li ZY , Nakamura F, Krasnopolsky R, Shang H. Magnetic Flux Expulsion in Star Formation.The Astrophysical Journal 742 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/156 2018

  43. [43]

    Spruit HC, Taam RE

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/10. Spruit HC, Taam RE. Mass transport in a neutron star magnetosphere. A&A 229 (1990) 475–493. Spruit HC, Stehle R, Papaloizou JCB. Interchange instability in and accretion disc with a poloidal magnetic field. MNRAS 275 (1995) 1223–1231. doi:10.1093/mnras/275.4.1223. Li ZY , McKee CF. Hydromagnetic Accretion Shocks around Low-M...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/1/10 1990

  44. [44]

    Li ZY , Krasnopolsky R, Shang H, Zhao B

    doi:10.1086/177329. Li ZY , Krasnopolsky R, Shang H, Zhao B. On the Role of Pseudodisk Warping and Reconnection in Protostellar Disk Formation in Turbulent Magnetized Cores. ApJ 793 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1086/177329 2014

  45. [45]

    Machida MN, Inutsuka Si, Matsumoto T

    doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/793/2/130. Machida MN, Inutsuka Si, Matsumoto T. First Direct Simulation of Brown Dwarf Formation in a Compact Cloud Core. The Astrophysical Journal 699 (2009) L157–L160. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/L157. Matsumoto T, Machida MN, ichiro Inutsuka S. Circumstellar disks and outflows in turbulent molecular cloud cores: Possible formatio...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/l157 2009

  46. [46]

    Grand-design Spiral Arms in a Young Forming Circumstellar Disk

    Tomida K, Machida MN, Hosokawa T, Sakurai Y , Lin CH. Grand-design Spiral Arms in a Young Forming Circumstellar Disk. The Astrophysical Journal 835 (2017) L11. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/835/1/L11. Machida MN, Inutsuka Si, Matsumoto T. Conditions for circumstellar disc formation: effects of initial cloud configuration and sink treatment. Monthly Notices of the ...

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/835/1/l11 2017

  47. [47]

    Frontiers 55 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Adams FC, Ruden SP, Shu FH

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab5b3. Frontiers 55 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Adams FC, Ruden SP, Shu FH. Eccentric Gravitational Instabilities in Nearly Keplerian Disks. The Astrophysical Journal 347 (1989)

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab5b3 1989

  48. [48]

    Shu FH, Tremaine S, Adams FC, Ruden SP

    doi:10.1086/168187. Shu FH, Tremaine S, Adams FC, Ruden SP. SLING Amplification and Eccentric Gravitational Instabilities in Gaseous Disks. The Astrophysical Journal 358 (1990)

    work page doi:10.1086/168187 1990

  49. [49]

    Krumholz MR, Klein RI, McKee CF

    doi:10.1086/169003. Krumholz MR, Klein RI, McKee CF. Radiation-Hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapse and Fragmentation in Massive Protostellar Cores. The Astrophysical Journal 656 (2007) 959–979. doi:10.1086/510664. Kuiper R, Klahr H, Beuther H, Henning T. Three-dimensional Simulation of Massive Star Formation in the Disk Accretion Scenario. The Astrophysi...

    work page doi:10.1086/169003 2007

  50. [50]

    From Large-scale to Protostellar Disk Fragmentation into Close Binary Stars

    Sigalotti LDG, Cruz F, Gabbasov R, Klapp J, Ram ´ırez-Velasquez J. From Large-scale to Protostellar Disk Fragmentation into Close Binary Stars. The Astrophysical Journal 857 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Bodenheimer P, Yorke HW, Rozyczka M, Tohline JE

    doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/aab619. Bodenheimer P, Yorke HW, Rozyczka M, Tohline JE. The Formation Phase of the Solar Nebula. The Astrophysical Journal 355 (1990)

    work page 1990

  52. [52]

    Rozyczka M

    doi:10.1086/168798. Rozyczka M. Two-dimensional models of stellar wind bubbles. I - Numerical methods and their application to the investigation of outer shell instabilities. Astronomy and Astrophysics 143 (1985) 59–71. Yorke HW, Bodenheimer P. The Formation of Protostellar Disks. III. The Influence of Gravitationally Induced Angular Momentum Transport on ...

    work page doi:10.1086/168798 1985

  53. [53]

    Krumholz MR, McKee CF, Klein RI

    doi:10.1086/164555. Krumholz MR, McKee CF, Klein RI. How Protostellar Outflows Help Massive Stars Form. ApJ 618 (2005) L33–L36. doi:10.1086/427555. Rosen AL, Krumholz MR, McKee CF, Klein RI. An unstable truth: how massive stars get their mass. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (2016) 2553–2573. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2153. Klassen M, Pudr...

    work page doi:10.1086/164555 2005

  54. [54]

    Kuiper R, Turner NJ, Yorke HW

    doi:10.3847/ 0004-637X/823/1/28. Kuiper R, Turner NJ, Yorke HW. Protostellar Outflows and Radiative Feedback from Massive Stars. II. Feedback, Star-formation Efficiency, and Outflow Broadening. ApJ 832 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Offner SSR, Klein RI, McKee CF, Krumholz MR

    doi:10.3847/ 0004-637X/832/1/40. Offner SSR, Klein RI, McKee CF, Krumholz MR. The Effects of Radiative Transfer on Low-Mass Star Formation. The Astrophysical Journal 703 (2009) 131–149. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/131. Stamatellos D, Whitworth AP, Hubber DA. The Importance of Episodic Accretion for Low-mass Star Formation. ApJ 730 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/1/131 2009

  56. [56]

    Fontani F, Commerc ¸on B, Giannetti A, Beltr ´an MT, S´anchez-Monge ´A, Testi L, et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/32. Fontani F, Commerc ¸on B, Giannetti A, Beltr ´an MT, S´anchez-Monge ´A, Testi L, et al. Fragmentation properties of massive protocluster gas clumps: an ALMA study. Astronomy and Astrophysics 615 (2018) A94. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832672. Jones MO, Bate MR. Sink particle radiative feedback in smoothed particle hydrodynamic...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/730/1/32 2018

  57. [57]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/1/

  58. [58]

    A., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18706.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417.1621D 417, 1621

    Dale JE, Bonnell I. Ionizing feedback from massive stars in massive clusters: fake bubbles and untriggered star formation. MNRAS 414 (2011) 321–328. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18392.x. Dale JE, Ercolano B, Bonnell IA. Ionizing feedback from massive stars in massive clusters - II. Disruption of bound clusters by photoionization. MNRAS 424 (2012) 377–392....

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18392.x 2011

  59. [59]

    1993, Astrophys

    doi:10.1086/172425. Matzner CD. Protostellar Outflow-driven Turbulence. ApJ 659 (2007) 1394–1403. doi:10.1086/512361. Nakamura F, Li ZY . Protostellar Turbulence Driven by Collimated Outflows. ApJ662 (2007) 395–412. doi:10.1086/517515. Krumholz MR. The big problems in star formation: The star formation rate, stellar clustering, and the initial mass function...

    work page doi:10.1086/172425 2007

  60. [60]

    Hansen CE, Klein RI, McKee CF, Fisher RT

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/107. Hansen CE, Klein RI, McKee CF, Fisher RT. Feedback Effects on Low-mass Star Formation. ApJ 747 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/740/2/107 2012

  61. [61]

    Myers AT, Klein RI, Krumholz MR, McKee CF

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/22. Myers AT, Klein RI, Krumholz MR, McKee CF. Star cluster formation in turbulent, magnetized dense clumps with radiative and outflow feedback. MNRAS 439 (2014) 3420–3438. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu190. Federrath C, Schr¨on M, Banerjee R, Klessen RS. Modeling Jet and Outflow Feedback during Star Cluster Formation. ApJ 790 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/1/22 2014

  62. [62]

    Murray D, Goyal S, Chang P

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/128. Murray D, Goyal S, Chang P. The effects of protostellar jet feedback on turbulent collapse. MNRAS 475 (2018) 1023–1035. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3153. Offner SSR, Chaban J. Impact of Protostellar Outflows on Turbulence and Star Formation Efficiency in Magnetized Dense Cores. ApJ 847 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/128 2018

  63. [63]

    Krumholz MR, Klein RI, McKee CF

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8996. Krumholz MR, Klein RI, McKee CF. Radiation-hydrodynamic Simulations of the Formation of Orion-like Star Clusters. II. The Initial Mass Function from Winds, Turbulence, and Radiation. ApJ 754 (2012)

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8996 2012

  64. [64]

    Nakamura F, Li ZY

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/71. Nakamura F, Li ZY . Clustered Star Formation in Magnetic Clouds: Properties of Dense Cores Formed in Outflow-driven Turbulence. ApJ 740 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/754/1/71 2011

  65. [65]

    Offner SSR, Liu Y

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/36. Offner SSR, Liu Y . Turbulent action at a distance due to stellar feedback in magnetized clouds.Nature Astronomy (2018)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/740/1/36 2018

  66. [66]

    Kuiper R, Yorke HW, Turner NJ

    doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0566-1. Kuiper R, Yorke HW, Turner NJ. Protostellar Outflows and Radiative Feedback from Massive Stars. ApJ 800 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0566-1 2015

  67. [67]

    Peters T, Klaassen PD, Mac Low MM, Schr¨on M, Federrath C, Smith MD, et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/86. Peters T, Klaassen PD, Mac Low MM, Schr¨on M, Federrath C, Smith MD, et al. Collective Outflow from a Small Multiple Stellar System. ApJ 788 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/86 2014

  68. [68]

    Kuiper R, Yorke H

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/14. Kuiper R, Yorke H. On the Simultaneous Evolution of Massive Protostars and Their Host Cores. ApJ 772 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/14 2013

  69. [69]

    Bodenheimer P, Laughlin GP, Rozyczka M, Yorke HW

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/61. Bodenheimer P, Laughlin GP, Rozyczka M, Yorke HW. Numerical Methods in Astrophysics: An Introduction . Part of the Series in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Edited by Peter Bodenheimer (2007). Yorke HW, Bodenheimer P. Theoretical Developments in Understanding Massive Star Formation. Beuther H, Linz H, Henning T, editors, Massiv...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/61 2007

  70. [70]

    The Astrophysical Multipurpose Software Environment

    Pelupessy FI, van Elteren A, de Vries N, McMillan SLW, Drost N, Portegies Zwart SF. The Astrophysical Multipurpose Software Environment. A&A 557 (2013) A84. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321252. This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article 58 Teyssier & Commerc ¸ on Numerical Methods in Star Formation Paxton B, Bildsten L, Dotter A, Herwig F, Lesaff...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321252 2013

  71. [71]

    Wall JE, McMillan SLW, Mac Low MM, Klessen RS, Portegies Zwart S

    doi:10.1088/ 0067-0049/192/1/3. Wall JE, McMillan SLW, Mac Low MM, Klessen RS, Portegies Zwart S. Collisional N-Body Dynamics Coupled to Self-Gravitating Magnetohydrodynamics Reveals Dynamical Binary Formation. arXiv e-prints (2019) arXiv:1901.01132. McMillan S, Portegies Zwart S, van Elteren A, Whitehead A. Simulations of Dense Stellar Systems with the A...

    work page arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    Population synthesis of high-mass binaries

    Portegies Zwart SF, Verbunt F. Population synthesis of high-mass binaries. A&A 309 (1996) 179–196. Wurster J, Bate MR, Price DJ. On the origin of magnetic fields in stars. MNRAS 481 (2018) 2450–2457. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2438. Baraffe I, V orobyov E, Chabrier G. Observed Luminosity Spread in Young Clusters and FU Ori Stars: A Unified Picture. ApJ 756 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2438 1996

  73. [73]

    Renaud F, Bournaud F, Emsellem E, Elmegreen B, Teyssier R, Alves J, et al

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/118. Renaud F, Bournaud F, Emsellem E, Elmegreen B, Teyssier R, Alves J, et al. A sub-parsec resolution simulation of the Milky Way: global structure of the interstellar medium and properties of molecular clouds. MNRAS 436 (2013) 1836–1851. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1698. Bournaud F, Elmegreen BG, Teyssier R, Block DL, Puerari I. IS...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/2/118 2013

  74. [74]

    Hopkins PF, Quataert E, Murray N

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/112. Hopkins PF, Quataert E, Murray N. The structure of the interstellar medium of star-forming galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 421 (2012) 3488–3521. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2012.20578.x. Hopkins PF, Kereˇs D, O ˜norbe J, Faucher-Gigu`ere CA, Quataert E, Murray N, et al. Galaxies on FIRE (Feedback I...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/2/112 2012

  75. [75]

    Supernova feedback in numerical simulations of galaxy formation: separating physics from numerics

    Smith MC, Sijacki D, Shen S. Supernova feedback in numerical simulations of galaxy formation: separating physics from numerics. MNRAS 478 (2018) 302–331. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty994. Hu CY , Naab T, Walch S, Glover SCO, Clark PC. Star formation and molecular hydrogen in dwarf galaxies: a non-equilibrium view. MNRAS 458 (2016) 3528–3553. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty994 2018

  76. [76]

    Butler MJ, Tan JC, Teyssier R, Rosdahl J, Van Loo S, Nickerson S

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/1. Butler MJ, Tan JC, Teyssier R, Rosdahl J, Van Loo S, Nickerson S. Kiloparsec-scale Simulations of Star Formation in Disk Galaxies. IV . Regulation of Galactic Star Formation Rates by Stellar Feedback. ApJ 841 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/1 2017

  77. [77]

    Kim CG, Kim WT, Ostriker EC

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7054. Kim CG, Kim WT, Ostriker EC. Regulation of Star Formation Rates in Multiphase Galactic Disks: Numerical Tests of the Thermal/Dynamical Equilibrium Model. ApJ 743 (2011)

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7054 2011

  78. [78]

    Kim CG, Ostriker EC, Kim WT

    doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/743/1/25. Kim CG, Ostriker EC, Kim WT. Three-dimensional Hydrodynamic Simulations of Multiphase Galactic Disks with Star Formation Feedback. I. Regulation of Star Formation Rates. ApJ 776 (2013)

    work page 2013

  79. [79]

    Kim CG, Ostriker EC

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/1. Kim CG, Ostriker EC. Vertical Equilibrium, Energetics, and Star Formation Rates in Magnetized Galactic Disks Regulated by Momentum Feedback from Supernovae. ApJ 815 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/1 2015

  80. [80]

    1088/0004-637X/815/1/67

    doi:10. 1088/0004-637X/815/1/67. Kim CG, Ostriker EC. Three-phase Interstellar Medium in Galaxies Resolving Evolution with Star Formation and Supernova Feedback (TIGRESS): Algorithms, Fiducial Model, and Convergence. ApJ 846 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.