pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09748 · v1 · pith:JZH4GG6Gnew · submitted 2019-07-23 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.IR· cs.LG

Position Focused Attention Network for Image-Text Matching

Yaxiong Wang , Hao Yang , Xueming Qian , Lin Ma , Jing Lu , Biao Li , Xin Fan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 17:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.IRcs.LG
keywords image-text matchingposition focused attentionvisual-textual embeddingattention mechanismFlickr30KMS-COCOTencent-News
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integrating relative position clues from image blocks via attention enhances visual region expressions and improves image-text matching accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that adding object position information through an attention mechanism on split image blocks strengthens the joint embedding between images and text. This is done by inferring relative positions of regions and using attention to create position features that refine region representations. A sympathetic reader would care because more reliable cross-modal similarity measures can improve tasks like image retrieval and caption generation. The method is evaluated on standard benchmarks and a large practical news dataset to demonstrate real-world applicability. If correct, it suggests position awareness is a key missing element in current matching models.

Core claim

The position focused attention network splits images into blocks to derive relative region positions, applies attention to model relations between regions and blocks for generating position features, and uses these features to enhance region expressions while building more reliable visual-textual relationships, resulting in state-of-the-art matching performance on Flickr30K, MS-COCO, and Tencent-News.

What carries the argument

The attention mechanism that generates position features by modeling relations between image regions and fixed blocks.

If this is right

  • State-of-the-art results on Flickr30K and MS-COCO benchmarks for image-text matching.
  • Strong performance on the large-scale practical Tencent-News dataset for real-world validation.
  • First reported evaluation of image-text matching on a collected news image-text corpus.
  • Improved joint embedding that better captures relations between visual regions and textual sentences.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This block-based position attention could extend to video-text matching where temporal positions matter.
  • Fixed blocks might be replaced by learned region proposals to test further gains in fine-grained matching.
  • Success on news data points to potential use in content search systems handling descriptive text.

Load-bearing premise

Relative position features from fixed image blocks will improve matching performance without introducing dataset-specific biases or needing undisclosed tuning.

What would settle it

An ablation study removing the position attention module and showing no drop or an increase in matching recall on the Flickr30K or MS-COCO test sets.

read the original abstract

Image-text matching tasks have recently attracted a lot of attention in the computer vision field. The key point of this cross-domain problem is how to accurately measure the similarity between the visual and the textual contents, which demands a fine understanding of both modalities. In this paper, we propose a novel position focused attention network (PFAN) to investigate the relation between the visual and the textual views. In this work, we integrate the object position clue to enhance the visual-text joint-embedding learning. We first split the images into blocks, by which we infer the relative position of region in the image. Then, an attention mechanism is proposed to model the relations between the image region and blocks and generate the valuable position feature, which will be further utilized to enhance the region expression and model a more reliable relationship between the visual image and the textual sentence. Experiments on the popular datasets Flickr30K and MS-COCO show the effectiveness of the proposed method. Besides the public datasets, we also conduct experiments on our collected practical large-scale news dataset (Tencent-News) to validate the practical application value of proposed method. As far as we know, this is the first attempt to test the performance on the practical application. Our method achieves the state-of-art performance on all of these three datasets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Position Focused Attention Network (PFAN) for image-text matching. Images are split into fixed blocks to derive relative position features for regions; an attention mechanism models relations between regions and blocks to produce position features that are integrated to enhance region representations and improve cross-modal similarity. The approach is evaluated on Flickr30K, MS-COCO, and a newly collected Tencent-News dataset, with claims of state-of-the-art performance on all three.

Significance. If the position features from fixed blocks deliver consistent, additive gains beyond standard attention or region features, the work would provide a simple, practical way to inject spatial structure into visual-text embeddings and demonstrate utility on a real-world news retrieval task. However, the absence of supporting quantitative evidence limits assessment of whether this holds.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that block-derived position features 'enhance the region expression and model a more reliable relationship' is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and implied full text per the provided description) contains no ablation tables, no comparison to detected bounding-box positions, and no controls isolating the position encoding from the attention module itself.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract / Experiments: no quantitative results, R@K scores, or statistical significance tests are reported despite the SOTA claim on three datasets; this prevents verification that gains are attributable to the position clue rather than unablated factors such as network capacity or hyperparameter choices.
  3. [Method] Method description: the assumption that fixed-block partitioning yields robust relative positions without dataset-specific artifacts is untested; no experiments vary block granularity or contrast against object-detector-based positions, which directly affects whether the contribution is general or artifact-driven.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The new Tencent-News dataset is introduced as a practical contribution, but no details on collection protocol, size, or annotation quality are supplied in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's detailed feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each major comment and provide point-by-point responses below. Where the comments highlight areas for improvement, we commit to revising the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that block-derived position features 'enhance the region expression and model a more reliable relationship' is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and implied full text per the provided description) contains no ablation tables, no comparison to detected bounding-box positions, and no controls isolating the position encoding from the attention module itself.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should better support the central claim with evidence. In the revised manuscript, we will include ablation tables, comparisons to detected bounding-box positions, and controls isolating the position encoding from the attention module to substantiate the claim that block-derived position features enhance region expression and model more reliable relationships. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract / Experiments: no quantitative results, R@K scores, or statistical significance tests are reported despite the SOTA claim on three datasets; this prevents verification that gains are attributable to the position clue rather than unablated factors such as network capacity or hyperparameter choices.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for quantitative evidence to support the SOTA claims. We will revise the abstract to report key R@K scores and include statistical significance tests in the experiments section to verify that the gains are due to the position features. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Method] Method description: the assumption that fixed-block partitioning yields robust relative positions without dataset-specific artifacts is untested; no experiments vary block granularity or contrast against object-detector-based positions, which directly affects whether the contribution is general or artifact-driven.

    Authors: We will add experiments that vary block granularity and contrast the fixed-block approach against object-detector-based positions to test the robustness of the relative position features and address potential dataset-specific artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: position features introduced as additive input with independent experimental validation

full rationale

The paper introduces PFAN by splitting images into fixed blocks to derive relative positions, then applying attention to generate position features that enhance region representations for image-text matching. This is presented as an architectural addition rather than a redefinition of the similarity metric or target. No equations are shown that equate a derived quantity back to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chains support the core premise, and no 'predictions' are statistically forced from subsets of the same data. Experiments on Flickr30K, MS-COCO, and Tencent-News serve as external validation. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the untested premise that block-derived position signals are generally useful and that the attention module can extract them reliably; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly listed in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Relative position of regions inferred from fixed image blocks provides a valuable clue for visual-text matching
    Invoked in the description of how position features are generated and used to enhance region expression.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5770 in / 1122 out tokens · 29894 ms · 2026-05-24T17:42:39.478624+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 1 Abstract Image-text matching tasks have recently attracted a lot of attention in the computer vision field. The key point of this cross-domain problem is how to accurately measure the similarity between the visual and the textual contents, which demands a fine unders...

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    2 Our Approach In this section, we will elaborate the details of our proposed framework. Figure 2 shows the flowchart of this paper, we first extract the features of the region and the position, the visual feature together with the generated position feature form the final region’s representation, and the alignments between the region and the word are stu...

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    In this subsection, we present our position attention mechanism

    Motivated by this observation, we fuse the position information into the learning procedure to capture more reliable and credible fine-grained interplay between the image and the text elements. In this subsection, we present our position attention mechanism. We first introduce the initial positional representation, and then elaborate the block embedding. ...

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Each image is split into 16×16 blocks (𝐾=16), and we set 𝐿 as

    The image region is extracted by the Faster R- CNN model [Ren et al., 2017], and we retain 36 detected regions for the image representation. Each image is split into 16×16 blocks (𝐾=16), and we set 𝐿 as

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    莫迪希望在安保及经济方面强化与日本战略关系

    The block index is first embedded into 200-dimensional space, and the original 2048-dimensional visual vector together with 200-dimensional position feature is mapped into the 1024-dimensional space by a linear projection layer. On the subject of word, the one-hot vector is first embedded into 300-dimensional dense representation, then the dense represent...

    work page 2048

  6. [6]

    white”, “running

    In this subsection, we visualize the attention results. An exemplary visualization result is shown in Figure 6, where the green box indicates the image region, the word with Figure 5: The visualization of position embedding similarity b a c d > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 6 the maximum attention we...

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matching

    [Lee et al., 2018] Kuang-Huei Lee, Xi Chen, Gang, Hua, Houdong Hu, and Xiaodong He. Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matching. In ECCV, pages 212-218,

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Natural language object retrieval

    [Hu et al., 2016] Ronghang Hu, Huazhe Xu, Marcus Rohrbach, Jiashi Feng, Kate Saenko, and Trevor Darrell. Natural language object retrieval. In CVPR,

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Look, Imagine and Match: Improving Textual-Visual Cross-Modal Retrieval with Generative Models

    [Gu et al., 2018] Jiuxiang Gu, Jianfei Cai, Shafiq R.Joty, Li Niu, and Gang Wang. Look, Imagine and Match: Improving Textual-Visual Cross-Modal Retrieval with Generative Models. In CVPR,

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Deep Correlation for Matching Images and Text

    [Yan et al., 2015] Fei Yan, and Krystian Mikolajczyk. Deep Correlation for Matching Images and Text. In CVPR,

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Linking Image and Text with 2-way Nets

    [Eisenschtat et al., 2017] Aviv Eisenschtat, and Lior Wolf. Linking Image and Text with 2-way Nets. In CVPR,

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention

    [Xu, et al., 2015] Kelvin Xu, Jimmy Ba, Ryan Kiros, Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron Courvile, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Richard Zemel, and Yoshua Bengio. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention. In ICML, pp. 2048–2057,

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Models

    [Kiros et al., 2014] Ryan Kiros, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Richard Zemel. Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Models. In arXiv/1141.2539,

    work page arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Show and tell: Lessons learned from the 2015 MSCOCO image captioning challenge

    [Vinyals, et al., 2017] Oriol Vinyals, Alexander Toshev, Samy Bengio, and Dumitru Erhan. Show and tell: Lessons learned from the 2015 MSCOCO image captioning challenge. IEEE TPAMI, 39(4):652–663,

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Multimodal convolutional neural networks for matching image and sentence

    [Ma et al., 2015] Lin Ma, Zhengdong Lu, Lifeng Shang, and Hang Li. Multimodal convolutional neural networks for matching image and sentence. In ICCV,

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Lawrence Figure

    [Antol et al., 2015] Stanislaw Antol, Aishwarya Agrawal, Jiasen Lu, Margaret Mitchell, Dhruv Batra, C. Lawrence Figure. 6: The visualization figures of attending image region to each word > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 7 Zitnick, and Devi Parikh. VQA: visual question answering. In ICCV, pages 2425–2433,

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Scalable and Effective Deep CCA via Soft Decorrelation

    [Chang et al., 2018] Xiaobin Chang, Tao Xiang, and Timothy Hospedales. Scalable and Effective Deep CCA via Soft Decorrelation. In CVPR, pages 1488-1497,

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Learning Two-Branch Neural Networks for Image-Text Matching Tasks

    [Wang et al., 2018] Liwei Wang, Yin Li, Jing Huang, and Svetlana Lazbnik. Learning Two-Branch Neural Networks for Image-Text Matching Tasks. IEEE TPAMI, 41(2):394-407,

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Fisher vectors derived from hybrid gaussian-laplacian mixture models for image annotation

    [Klein et al., 2015] Benjamin Klein, Guy Lev, Gil Sadeh, and Lior Wolf. Fisher vectors derived from hybrid gaussian-laplacian mixture models for image annotation. In CVPR,

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Leveraging visual question answering for image-caption rank

    [Lin et al., 2016] Xiao Lin, and Devi Parikh. Leveraging visual question answering for image-caption rank. In ECCV, pages 261–277,

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Deep Cross-Modal Projection Learning for Image-Text Matching

    [Zhang et al., 2018] Ying Zhang, and Huchuan Lu. Deep Cross-Modal Projection Learning for Image-Text Matching. In ECCV, pages 707-723,

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Dual Attention Networks for Multimodal Reasoning and Matching

    [Nam et al., 2017] Hyeonseob Nam, Jung-Woo Ha, and Jeonghee Kim. Dual Attention Networks for Multimodal Reasoning and Matching. In CVPR, pages. 2156-2164,

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Learning Semantic Concepts and Order for Image and Sentence Matching

    [Huang et al., 2018] Yan Huang, Qi Wu, Chunfeng Song, and Liang Wang. Learning Semantic Concepts and Order for Image and Sentence Matching. In CVPR,

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Dual-Path Convolutional Image-Text Embedding with Instance Loss

    [Zheng et al., 2018] Zhedong Zheng, Liang Zheng, Michael Garrett, Yi Yang, and Yi-Dong Shen. Dual-Path Convolutional Image-Text Embedding with Instance Loss. In CVPR,

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    VSE++: Improving Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Hard Negatives

    [Faghri et al., 2018] Fartash Faghri, David Fleet, Jamie Kiros, and Sanja Fidler. VSE++: Improving Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Hard Negatives. In BMVC,

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Instance-Aware Image and Sentence Matching with Selection Multimodal LSTM

    [Huang et al., 2017] Yan Huang, Wei Wang, and Liang Wang. Instance-Aware Image and Sentence Matching with Selection Multimodal LSTM. In CVPR, pages 7254-7262,

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Hierarchical Multimodal LSTM for Dense Visual-Semantic Embedding

    [Niu et al.,2017] Zhenxing Niu, Mo Zhou, Le Wang, Xinbo Gao, and Gang Hua. Hierarchical Multimodal LSTM for Dense Visual-Semantic Embedding. In ICCV, pages. 1899-1907,

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating image descriptions

    [Karpathy et al., 2015] Andrej Karpathy, and Li Fei-Fei. Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating image descriptions. In CVPR, pages 3128-3138,

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Caption and VQA

    [Anderson et al., 2018] Peter Anderson, Xiaodong He, Chris Buehler, Damien Teney, Mark Johnson, Stephen Gould, and Lie Zhang. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Caption and VQA. In CVPR,

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Matching Image and Sentence with Multi-faceted Representation

    [Ma et al., 2019] Lin Ma, Wenhao Jiang, Zequn Jie, Yugang Jiang, and Wei Liu. Matching Image and Sentence with Multi-faceted Representation. early access, IEEE TCSVT,

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Joint Global and Co-Attentive Representation Learning for Image-Sentence Retrieval

    [Wang et al., 2018] Shuhui Wang, Yangyu Chen, Junbao Zhuo, Qingming Huang, and Qi Tian. Joint Global and Co-Attentive Representation Learning for Image-Sentence Retrieval. In ACM Multimedia, pages 1398-1406,

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Bidirectional image-sentence retrieval by local and global deep matching

    [Ma et al., 2019] Lin Ma, Wenhao Jiang, Zequn Jie, and Xu Wang. Bidirectional image-sentence retrieval by local and global deep matching. Neurocomputing, 345:36-44,

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Multimodal Similarity Gaussian Process Latent Variable Model

    [Song et al., 2017] Guoli Song, Shuhui Wang, Qingming Huang, and Qi Tian. Multimodal Similarity Gaussian Process Latent Variable Model. IEEE TIP, 26(9):4168-4181,

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answering

    [Yang et al., 2016] Zihao Yang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, and Alexander Smola. Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answering. In CVPR, pages 21-29,

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Where to look: Focus regions for visual question answering

    [Shih et al., 2016] Kevin Shih, Saurabh Singh, and Derek Hoiem. Where to look: Focus regions for visual question answering. In CVPR, pages 4613-4621,

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition

    [He et al., 2016] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In CVPR, pages 770-778,

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks

    [Ren et al., 2017] Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. IEEE TPAMI, 39(6):1137-1149,

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image

    [Krishna et al., 2017] Ranjay Krishna, Yuke Zhu, Oliver Groth, Justin Johnson, Kenji Hata, Joshua Kravitz, Stephanie Chen, Yannis Kalantidis, Li-jia Li, David Shamma, Michael Bernstein, and Li Fei-Fei. Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image. In IJCV, 123(1): 32-73,

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    [Kingma et al., 2015] Diederik Kingma, and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In ICLR,

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Qian, Dan

    [Qian et al., 2017] Xueming. Qian, Dan. Lu, Yaxiong. Wang, Li. Zhu, Yuanyan Tang, and Meng. Wang. Image Re-Ranking Based on Topic Diversity. IEEE TIP, 26(8):2724-2747,

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    [Wang et al., 2018] Yaxiong Wang, Li Zhu, Xueming Qian, and Junwei. Han. Joint Hypergraph Learning for Tag-Based Image Retrieval. IEEE Trans on Image Processing, 27(9): 4437-4451,

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Hadamard Product for Low-Rank Bilinear Pooling

    [Kim et al., 2017] Jin-Hwa Kim, Kyoung Woon On, Woosang Lim, Jeonghee Kim, JungWoo Ha, and Byoung-Tak Zhang. Hadamard Product for Low-Rank Bilinear Pooling. In ICLR,

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    2017] Linchao Zhu, Zhongwen Xu, and Yi Yang

    [Zhu et al. 2017] Linchao Zhu, Zhongwen Xu, and Yi Yang. Bidirectional multirate reconstruction for temporal modeling in videos. In CVPR, pages 1339-1348,

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Multi-View Clustering via Deep Matrix Factorization

    [Zhao et al., 2017] Handong Zhao, Zhengming Ding, and Yun Fu. Multi-View Clustering via Deep Matrix Factorization. In AAAI, pages 2921-2927,

    work page 2017