REVIEW 2 cited by
Improved limits on a stochastic gravitational-wave background and its anisotropies from Advanced LIGO O1 and O2 runs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We integrate the entire, publicly available, Advanced LIGO (ALIGO) data set to obtain maximum-likelihood constraint maps of the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background (SGWB). From these we derive limits on the energy density of the stochastic background $\Omega_{\rm GW}$, and its anisotropy. We find 95% confident limits $\Omega_{\rm GW} < 5.2\times 10^{-8}$ at $50$ Hz for a spectral index $\alpha=2/3$ consistent with a stochastic background due to inspiral events and $\Omega_{\rm GW} < 3.2\times 10^{-7}$ for a scale (frequency) invariant spectrum. We also report upper limits on the angular power spectra $C_\ell$ for three broadband integrations of the data. Finally we present an estimate where we integrate the data into ten separate spectral bins as a first attempt to carry out a model-independent estimate the SGWB and its anisotropies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Directional Search for Persistent Gravitational Waves: Results from the First Part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Fourth Observing Run
An 8.3-year LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA search for persistent, direction-dependent gravitational waves finds no signal and yields the most restrictive upper limits to date on anisotropic backgrounds and targeted sources.
-
Estimating the gravitational wave background anisotropy: a Bayesian approach boosted by cross-correlation angular power spectrum
A new likelihood function estimates GWB anisotropy angular power spectra directly from detector data, and cross-correlation with the CMB can make the quadrupole measurable with four years of LISA data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.