REVIEW 3 cited by
Label Switching Problem in Bayesian Analysis for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The label switching problem arises in the Bayesian analysis of models containing multiple indistinguishable parameters with arbitrary ordering. Any permutation of these parameters is equivalent, therefore models with many such parameters have extremely multi-modal posterior distributions. It is difficult to sample efficiently from such posteriors. This paper discusses a solution to this problem which involves carefully mapping the input parameter space to a high dimensional hypertriangle. It is demonstrated that this solution is efficient even for large numbers of parameters and can be easily applied alongside any stochastic sampling algorithm. This method is illustrated using two example problems from the field of gravitational wave astronomy.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Can Transformers help us perform parameter estimation of overlapping signals in gravitational wave detectors?
A Transformer-based encoder paired with a Normalizing Flow estimates parameters of three overlapping binary black hole signals in simulated Einstein Telescope data, returning posteriors in about one second.
-
Modular global-fit pipeline for LISA data analysis
A modular, scalable pipeline recovers 15 massive black hole mergers and 9542 galactic binaries from the LISA 'Sangria' simulation, with 85% of binaries with SNR above 8 correctly identified.
-
Bayesian inflationary reconstructions from Planck 2018 data
Flexible Bayesian reconstructions of Planck 2018 data confirm a power-law primordial spectrum on 50<ell<2000 and leave low-ell oscillation hints statistically insignificant.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.