Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 79 references

Valley Phenomena in the Candidate Phase Change Material WSe$_{2(1-x)}$Te$_{2x}$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Monolayer WSe2(1-x)Te2x alloys preserve valley polarization up to x = 0.14 and valley coherence up to x = 0.37, and outperform pure WSe2 at elevated temperatures.

desk verdict First low-temperature valley study of WSe2(1-x)Te2x alloys, with careful benchmarking and useful DFT support; the headline temperature-robustness claim is under-supported by one specimen per composition and a fixed excitation detuning. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.00506 v2 pith:BV7GB7UF submitted 2019-08-01 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sean M. Oliver , Joshua Young , Sergiy Krylyuk , Thomas L. Reinecke , Albert V. Davydov , Patrick M. Vora This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords transitionmetaldichalcogenidesvalleypolarizationcoherenceWSe2(1-x)Te2xmonolayeralloysRamanspectroscopyphotoluminescencephase-changematerial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Monolayer alloys of WSe2 and WTe2 are studied as a way to combine valleytronics with band engineering. The paper claims that substituting tellurium into WSe2 preserves the valley degree of freedom: valley polarization, the chance that an exciton stays in the valley where it was created, survives for tellurium fractions x ≤ 0.14, and valley coherence, the chance an exciton keeps a K–K′ superposition, survives up to x ≤ 0.37. Surprisingly, the alloys hold these valley properties at higher temperatures than pure WSe2 does, with the x = 0.04 alloy reaching up to 3.5 times the polarization of WSe2 at 100 K. These results matter because they suggest disorder and band engineering do not necessarily destroy valleytronic function, and may even extend it toward applications such as phase-change memory.

What carries the argument

The valley polarization ρVP and valley coherence ρVC extracted from polarization-resolved photoluminescence (co- and cross-circular for ρVP, co- and cross-linear for ρVC) are the central observables. The material platform is the 1H-phase monolayer alloy WSe2(1-x)Te2x with x up to 0.37, grown by chemical vapor transport and encapsulated in hexagonal boron nitride. Supporting machinery: low-temperature Raman with DFT phonon calculations identifies the 1H-to-1Td phase boundary near x = 0.4 and assigns alloy-only modes to W–Te vibrations; DFT with HSE06 gives optical band gaps matching PL; the trion-to-exciton intensity ratio is used as a proxy for doping to suggest screening as the mechanism behind the temperature robustness.

What would settle it

Measure ρVP and ρVC as functions of excitation photon energy for each alloy composition at each temperature, choosing photon energies that keep the detuning from that alloy's X0 exciton fixed; if the advantage of alloys over WSe2 at 100 K disappears under equal detuning, the central claim of intrinsic temperature robustness would not be supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At 5 K, tellurium substitution into monolayer WSe2 preserves a large degree of exciton valley polarization for x ≤ 0.14 (about 49% at x = 0 and 32% at x = 0.14) while exciton valley coherence remains measurable up to x = 0.37 even after valley polarization has disappeared. Raising the temperature shows the alloy's valley properties decay more slowly than pure WSe2's: valley polarization of the x = 0.04 alloy exceeds WSe2 by a factor of 3.5 at 100 K and valley coherence remains larger at elevated temperature as well. The paper interprets these trends as evidence that alloy disorder arising from the roughly 7–8% bond-length mismatch between W–Se and W–Te does not necessarily depolarize valley excitons, and that screening or reduced exciton lifetime may even help preserve valley information. DFT calculations and Raman/PL measurements place the 1H semiconductor phase boundary at x ≈ 0.4, give an optical gap that tunes from 1.735 eV to 1.519 eV between x = 0 and x = 0.37, and identify a new defect emission band attributed to Te-induced lattice displacement.

Load-bearing premise

The comparisons assume that shining the same 633 nm (1.96 eV) laser creates equally strong valley populations in every alloy, even though the alloy band gap shrinks from 1.735 eV to 1.519 eV as tellurium content rises; that changing energy difference, rather than an intrinsic property of the alloy, could explain part of the apparent temperature robustness.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Valley polarization survives alloying for x ≤ 0.14 and valley coherence for x ≤ 0.37, so the alloy platform is valley-active across a sizable band-gap range.
  • At 100 K the x = 0.04 alloy shows up to 3.5 times the valley polarization of pure WSe2, and the x = 0.14 alloy also surpasses WSe2 at 100 K.
  • Since valley coherence persists even when valley polarization vanishes for x between 0.14 and 0.37, excitation can be tuned to favor either valley information channel.
  • The 1H phase is stable up to x ≈ 0.4, so valley-active alloys sit just before the transition to the semimetallic 1Td phase, enabling phase-change and valleytronic integration.
  • Trion valley polarization tracks the neutral-exciton trend with temperature, so charged excitons inherit the robustness as well.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Direct test: measure ρVP and ρVC versus excitation energy at fixed detuning from each alloy's X0; if the high-temperature advantage disappears, the intrinsic-robustness claim would need revision.
  • If the effect is screening- or lifetime-based, electrostatic gating could push alloys to even higher operating temperatures; gating experiments on Te-substituted WSe2 would test this.
  • The paper notes it cannot uniquely fit the temperature data because both exciton and valley relaxation times are complicated functions of temperature; time-resolved PL measuring τ_x and τ_v at each x would close that gap.
  • The same bond-length-mismatch disorder proposed to create the L2 band might be tunable with stoichiometry, turning a defect band into a design handle for localized-state engineering.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports low-temperature Raman, temperature-dependent photoluminescence, and polarization-resolved valley measurements on hBN-encapsulated monolayer WSe2(1-x)Te2x alloys grown by chemical vapor transport. The authors use DFT calculations to map the 1H-to-1Td phase boundary near x ≈ 0.4, assign alloy-induced Raman modes to W-Te vibrations, and show that the X0 emission energy shifts from 1.735 eV at x = 0 to 1.519 eV at x = 0.37. They also identify a new low-energy emission feature, L2, which they attribute to Te-induced structural disorder. The central valley results are that valley polarization remains nonzero for x ≤ 0.14 at 5 K, valley coherence remains nonzero for x ≤ 0.37, and both quantities appear to be more robust against temperature in some alloys than in pure WSe2.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper is a valuable demonstration that valley properties can survive heavy isoelectronic alloying with a semimetallic parent compound, and the composition thresholds it reports are useful benchmarks. The 5 K measurements of rhoVP and rhoVC across composition are direct, internally consistent, and benchmarked against a cleaned WSe2 reference, and the Raman/DFT mode assignments, especially the identification of new 1H-phase W-Te vibrations, are a solid contribution. The main weakness is that the headline temperature-robustness claim is not supported at the same evidentiary level: it rests on a single heterostructure per composition, on error bars that appear to be spectral-fit uncertainties rather than sample-to-sample statistics, and on a fixed excitation energy whose detuning changes substantially across the alloy series. The 5 K composition thresholds are credible; the extrapolation to intrinsically higher temperature robustness is the part that needs additional experimental support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Valley Phenomena, Fig. 6; Supplementary Fig. S9] The central claim that alloys sustain valley polarization and coherence at higher temperatures than WSe2 rests on temperature series from a single heterostructure per composition. The error bars in Fig. 6 are described as one standard deviation, but from the fitting procedure in the Methods they appear to be spectral-fit uncertainties rather than specimen-to-specimen variability. This matters because the authors show in Supplementary Fig. S9 that the nano-squeegee cleaning procedure alone changed rhoVP of X0 in WSe2 from 29% to 49%, and they attribute the larger XT/X0 ratio of the x = 0.04 sample to a superior cleaned interface. With no replicate specimens, the reported 3.5x enhancement of x = 0.04 over WSe2 at 100 K in Fig. 6a cannot be separated from interface quality. Please provide multiple independently fabricated devices per composition, or explicitly restrict the temperature-robustness statement to the measured specimens.
  2. [Methods (Optical Studies); Fig. 6] All polarization-resolved PL measurements in Fig. 6 use a fixed 1.96 eV (633 nm) excitation, while E0 decreases from 1.735 eV at x = 0 to 1.519 eV at x = 0.37 (Fig. 4b). Valley polarization in TMDs is strongly dependent on excitation energy (Ref. 18), so the detuning changes by roughly 200 meV across the alloy series. Without measuring rhoVP and rhoVC versus excitation energy for at least x = 0.14 and x = 0.37, part of the apparent temperature robustness could reflect resonant detuning rather than an intrinsic alloy property. This concern is less important for x = 0.04, whose gap is close to that of WSe2, but it does affect the x = 0.14 and x = 0.37 curves in Fig. 6. A detuning check is needed to support the comparison of temperature dependences.
  3. [Excitonic Properties; Fig. 4b] The X0 energies extracted from PL are exciton energies, while the HSE06 calculations are single-particle band gaps. Comparing them directly and describing the agreement as 'extremely well' is not well defined without including an exciton-binding correction, which is especially significant in monolayers. If the HSE06 numbers are quasiparticle gaps, the apparent agreement with X0 should be presented as accidental or compensated; if they are meant to approximate optical transition energies, the calculation procedure should be justified. Please clarify what the HSE06 values represent in Fig. 4b and in the text.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Supplementary Fig. 7] The caption says '2.33 nm excitation'; this should be '2.33 eV' (or 532 nm).
  2. [Fig. 4b and related text] The linear extrapolation of E0 to x = 1 to obtain a 0 K band gap of 1.15 eV for 1H-WTe2 is based on only five 1H-phase compositions and assumes no bowing; the authors already note that the bowing parameter cannot be reliably determined, so the extrapolated value should be labeled as a rough estimate.
  3. [Valley Phenomena] The inline equations for rhoVP and rhoVC are clear, but numbering them would make the later discussion of the expressions and their limiting behavior easier to follow.
  4. [Excitonic Properties, L2 discussion] The assignment of L2 to a new band of deep defect states is presented as a suggestion, which is appropriate; however, given that no direct structural or chemical characterization is provided, the text should state more explicitly that this is a hypothesis inferred from the MD simulations of a related alloy system.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the valley claims are direct polarization-resolved measurements, and the DFT benchmarks are independent of the valley observables.

full rationale

The central valley claims are experimental: rho_VP and rho_VC are obtained directly from co- and cross-polarized PL spectra using standard operational definitions, with no fitted parameter or same-group prior result used to produce the numbers. The DFT phase diagram, phonon dispersions, and HSE06 optical gaps are parameter-free calculations compared with, not fitted to, the Raman and PL data; the agreement with measured X0 energies is an independent benchmark. The only fit touching band-gap information is the E0(T) fit to Eq. (1) and the explicitly labeled linear E0(x) extrapolation used to estimate a hypothetical 1H-WTe2 gap of 1.15 eV; that extrapolation is transparent, is not called a first-principles prediction, and is not used in the valley-polarization or valley-coherence conclusions. The only same-group citation (Ref. 51) is used as an agreement check for broadened Raman features in Te-rich WTe2-like alloys and is not load-bearing. The single-specimen-per-composition temperature comparison and the fixed 1.96 eV excitation are external-validity or correctness concerns, not circularity, because no equation in the paper forces the alloy valley result from the WSe2 baseline. No derivation step reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central empirical claims rest on standard experimental measurements and DFT calculations rather than on many tuned parameters. The main fitted quantities are per-composition gap and phonon parameters from the O'Donnell-Chen formula, plus a linear extrapolation for hypothetical 1H-WTe2. The load-bearing assumptions are about representativeness of bilayer WTe2, transferability of 1T'/1Td equivalence and of MD results from another alloy, and the direct comparison of DFT gaps to PL exciton energies.

free parameters (4)
  • E0 (zero-temperature X0 energy per composition) = 1.735 eV (x=0) to 1.519 eV (x=0.37)
    Fitted per composition from PL X0 temperature series using Eq. (1); these are empirical zero-temperature exciton energies, not first-principles outputs.
  • S (dimensionless electron-phonon coupling parameter) = 1.93 to 2.24
    Fit to Eq. (1) for each alloy composition and reported in Fig. 4c.
  • <hbar omega> (average phonon energy) = 4 to 16 meV
    Fit to Eq. (1) for each alloy composition and reported in Fig. 4d.
  • 1H-WTe2 extrapolated 0 K optical band gap = 1.15 eV
    Obtained by linear extrapolation of fitted E0 values from x = 0 to x = 1; no natural 1H-WTe2 sample exists, so this is a derived extrapolation rather than a measurement.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Bilayer WTe2 Raman spectra are representative of monolayer WTe2
    Monolayer WTe2 exfoliation was difficult, so the paper uses bilayer WTe2 to identify 1Td-phase Raman signatures, relying on Ref. 43 for near-identical spectra.
  • domain assumption 1T' and 1Td phases are equivalent for DFT calculations
    Methods states that all WTe2 calculations used the 1T' structure because differences from 1Td are small, citing Ref. 34.
  • domain assumption Te substitution does not change the sign of the conduction band spin-orbit coupling
    The paper infers a dark lowest exciton for all alloys from W-based TMD behavior (Ref. 53); if the sign flipped, the interpretation of weak low-temperature PL and valley dynamics would change.
  • domain assumption HSE06 optical gaps can be compared directly with measured X0 PL energies
    Used in Fig. 4b, where DFT gaps are said to agree extremely well with PL X0 energies; this ignores exciton binding energy and assumes cancellation or a small binding energy.
  • domain assumption MD results for WS2-xTex transfer to WSe2(1-x)Te2x
    Used to attribute the L2 emission feature to tellurium displacement and internal strain from bond-length mismatch, based on simulations of a different alloy system.
  • domain assumption Small-supercell DFT captures the alloy phase boundary
    The 1H to 1Td phase boundary at x around 0.4 comes from DFT with a limited set of substitutional configurations, not from a full random-alloy sampling.
invented entities (1)
  • L2 deep defect band
    purpose: Explains the PL emission feature about 300 meV below X0 that appears for Te-rich 1H alloys with x > 0.04
    The emission feature is measured, but its assignment to a band of strain-induced defect states is inferred from MD simulations of a different alloy and from bond-length arguments; no direct structural or chemical identification is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Valley Phenomena in the Candidate Phase Change Material WSe$_{2(1-x)}$Te$_{2x}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BV7GB7UF

@misc{pith2026190800506,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Valley Phenomena in the Candidate Phase Change Material WSe$_2(1-x)$Te$_2x$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BV7GB7UF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00506}
}
abstract

Alloyed transition metal dichalcogenides provide an opportunity for coupling band engineering with valleytronic phenomena in an atomically-thin platform. However, valley properties in alloys remain largely unexplored. We investigate the valley degree of freedom in monolayer alloys of the phase change candidate material WSe$_{2(1-x)}$Te$_{2x}$. Low temperature Raman measurements track the alloy-induced transition from the semiconducting 1H phase of WSe$_2$ to the semimetallic 1T$_d$ phase of WTe$_2$. We correlate these observations with density functional theory calculations and identify new Raman modes from W-Te vibrations in the 1H alloy phase. Photoluminescence measurements show ultra-low energy emission features that highlight alloy disorder arising from the large W-Te bond lengths. Interestingly, valley polarization and coherence in alloys survive at high Te compositions and are more robust against temperature than in WSe$_2$. These findings illustrate the persistence of valley properties in alloys with highly dissimilar parent compounds and suggest band engineering can be utilized for valleytronic devices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Vitale, S. A. et al. Valleytronics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Paths Forward. Small 14, 1801483 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    & Heinz, T

    Xu, X., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Heinz, T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 10, 343–350 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    F., Xiao, D

    Mak, K. F., Xiao, D. & Shan, J. Light–valley interactions in 2D semiconductors. Nat. Photonics 12, 451–460 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Schaibley, J. R. et al. Valleytronics in 2D materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    & Das Sarma, S

    Žutić, I., Fabian, J. & Das Sarma, S. Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323–410 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Splendiani, A. et al. Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 10, 1271–1275 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J

    Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010). 16

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    & Cui, X

    Zeng, H., Dai, J., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Cui, X. Valley polarization in MoS2 monolayers by optical pumping. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 490–493 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    F., He, K., Shan, J

    Mak, K. F., He, K., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494–498 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Jones, A. M. et al. Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 634–638 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Wang, G. et al. Valley dynamics probed through charged and neutral exciton emission in monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. B 90, 075413 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Hao, K. et al. Direct measurement of exciton valley coherence in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 12, 677–682 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Huang, J., Hoang, T. B. & Mikkelsen, M. H. Probing the origin of excitonic states in monolayer WSe2. Sci. Rep. 6, 22414 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Wang, G. et al. Control of Exciton Valley Coherence in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Monolayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 187401 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Aivazian, G. et al. Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 11, 148– 152 (2015)

    2015

  8. [17]

    & Heinz, T

    Ye, Z., Sun, D. & Heinz, T. F. Optical manipulation of valley pseudospin. Nat. Phys. 13, 26–29 (2016)

    2016

  9. [18]

    & Saito, R

    Tatsumi, Y., Ghalamkari, K. & Saito, R. Laser energy dependence of valley polarization in transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 94, 235408 (2016)

    2016

  10. [19]

    Yu, T. & Wu, M. W. Valley depolarization due to intervalley and intravalley electron-hole exchange interactions in monolayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 89, 205303 (2014)

    2014

  11. [20]

    Kioseoglou, G. et al. Valley polarization and intervalley scattering in monolayer MoS2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 221907 (2012)

    2012

  12. [21]

    Miyauchi, Y. et al. Evidence for line width and carrier screening effects on excitonic valley relaxation in 2D semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018)

    2018

  13. [22]

    Shinokita, K. et al. Continuous Control and Enhancement of Excitonic Valley Polarization in Monolayer WSe2 by Electrostatic Doping. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1900260 (2019)

    2019

  14. [23]

    Xie, L. M. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide alloys: Preparation, characterization and applications. Nanoscale 7, 18392–18401 (2015)

    2015

  15. [24]

    N., Li, Y

    Duerloo, K.-A. N., Li, Y. & Reed, E. J. Structural phase transitions in two-dimensional Mo- and W-dichalcogenide monolayers. Nat. Commun. 5, 4214 (2014)

    2014

  16. [25]

    A., Li, Y., Pop, E

    Rehn, D. A., Li, Y., Pop, E. & Reed, E. J. Theoretical potential for low energy consumption phase change memory utilizing electrostatically-induced structural phase transitions in 2D materials. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 2 (2018)

    2018

  17. [26]

    Wang, X. et al. Potential 2D Materials with Phase Transitions: Structure, Synthesis, and Device Applications. Adv. Mater. 1804682, 1804682 (2018). 17

    2018

  18. [27]

    Duerloo, K.-A. N. & Reed, E. J. Structural Phase Transitions by Design in Monolayer Alloys. ACS Nano 10, 289–297 (2016)

    2016

  19. [28]

    Wang, G. et al. Spin-orbit engineering in transition metal dichalcogenide alloy monolayers. Nat. Commun. 6, 10110 (2015)

    2015

  20. [30]

    Yun, S. J. et al. Telluriding monolayer MoS2 and WS2 via alkali metal scooter. Nat. Commun. 8, 2163 (2017)

    2017

  21. [31]

    Yu, P. et al. Metal-Semiconductor Phase-Transition in WSe2(1-x)Te2x Monolayer. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603991 (2017)

    2017

  22. [32]

    Lin, J. et al. Anisotropic Ordering in 1T′ Molybdenum and Tungsten Ditelluride Layers Alloyed with Sulfur and Selenium. ACS Nano 12, 894–901 (2018)

    2018

  23. [34]

    Xu, S. Y. et al. Electrically switchable Berry curvature dipole in the monolayer topological insulator WTe2. Nat. Phys. 14, 900–906 (2018)

    2018

  24. [36]

    del Corro, E. et al. Excited Excitonic States in 1L, 2L, 3L, and Bulk WSe2 Observed by Resonant Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Nano 8, 9629–9635 (2014)

    2014

  25. [37]

    Zhao, W. et al. Lattice dynamics in mono- and few-layer sheets of WS2 and WSe2. Nanoscale 5, 9677 (2013)

    2013

  26. [38]

    Terrones, H. et al. New First Order Raman-active Modes in Few Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Sci. Rep. 4, 4215 (2015)

    2015

  27. [39]

    Luo, X. et al. Effects of lower symmetry and dimensionality on Raman spectra in two-dimensional WSe2. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 88, 1–7 (2013)

    2013

  28. [40]

    Sun, H. et al. Enhanced exciton emission behavior and tunable band gap of ternary W(SxSe1-x)2 monolayer: temperature dependent optical evidence and first-principles calculations. Nanoscale 10, 11553–11563 (2018)

    2018

  29. [41]

    Cuscó, R. et al. Temperature dependence of Raman scattering in ZnO. Phys. Rev. B 75, 165202 (2007)

    2007

  30. [42]

    Ye, F. et al. Environmental Instability and Degradation of Single- and Few-Layer WTe2 Nanosheets in Ambient Conditions. Small 12, 5802–5808 (2016)

    2016

  31. [43]

    C., Gao, J

    Jiang, Y. C., Gao, J. & Wang, L. Raman fingerprint for semi-metal WTe2 evolving from bulk to monolayer. Sci. Rep. 6, 19624 (2016)

    2016

  32. [44]

    Cao, Y. et al. Anomalous vibrational modes in few layer WTe2 revealed by polarized Raman scattering and first-principles calculations. 2D Mater. 4, 035024 (2017)

    2017

  33. [45]

    Kim, Y. et al. Anomalous Raman scattering and lattice dynamics in mono- and few-layer WTe2. Nanoscale 8, 2309–2316 (2016). 18

    2016

  34. [46]

    Duan, X. et al. Synthesis of WS2xSe2–2x Alloy Nanosheets with Composition-Tunable Electronic Properties. Nano Lett. 16, 264–269 (2016)

    2016

  35. [47]

    Fu, Q. et al. Synthesis and Enhanced Electrochemical Catalytic Performance of Monolayer WS2(1- x)Se2x with a Tunable Band Gap. Adv. Mater. 27, 4732–4738 (2015)

    2015

  36. [48]

    Mann, J. et al. 2-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides with Tunable Direct Band Gaps: MoS2(1-x)Se2x Monolayers. Adv. Mater. 26, 1399–1404 (2014)

    2014

  37. [49]

    Feng, Q. et al. Growth of MoS2(1– x)Se2x (x = 0.41 – 1.00) Monolayer Alloys with Controlled Morphology by Physical Vapor Deposition. ACS Nano 9, 7450–7455 (2015)

    2015

  38. [50]

    Jadczak, J. et al. Composition dependent lattice dynamics in MoSxSe(2-x) alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 116, (2014)

    2014

  39. [51]

    Oliver, S. M. et al. The structural phases and vibrational properties of Mo1−xWxTe2 alloys. 2D Mater. 4, 045008 (2017)

    2017

  40. [53]

    P., Urbaszek, B., Amand, T., Marie, X

    Echeverry, J. P., Urbaszek, B., Amand, T., Marie, X. & Gerber, I. C. Splitting between bright and dark excitons in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 93, 1–5 (2016)

    2016

  41. [54]

    Paur, M. et al. Electroluminescence from multi-particle exciton complexes in transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 10, 1709 (2019)

    2019

  42. [55]

    Tongay, S. et al. Defects activated photoluminescence in two-dimensional semiconductors: interplay between bound, charged and free excitons. Sci. Rep. 3, 2657 (2013)

    2013

  43. [56]

    O’Donnell, K. P. & Chen, X. Temperature dependence of semiconductor band gaps. Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2924–2926 (1991)

    1991

  44. [57]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  45. [58]

    Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215 (2003)

    2003

  46. [61]

    Tang, B. et al. Phase‐Controlled Synthesis of Monolayer Ternary Telluride with a Random Local Displacement of Tellurium Atoms. Adv. Mater. 1900862, 1900862 (2019)

    2019

  47. [62]

    Hanbicki, A. T. et al. Optical polarization of excitons and trions under continuous and pulsed excitation in single layers of WSe2. Nanoscale 9, 17422–17428 (2017)

    2017

  48. [63]

    Screening effects due to carrier doping on valley relaxation in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers

    Konabe, S. Screening effects due to carrier doping on valley relaxation in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 073104 (2016)

    2016

  49. [64]

    M., Currie, M., Hanbicki, A

    McCreary, K. M., Currie, M., Hanbicki, A. T., Chuang, H. J. & Jonker, B. T. Understanding Variations in Circularly Polarized Photoluminescence in Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 11, 7988–7994 (2017). 19

    2017

  50. [65]

    & Vamivakas, A

    Chakraborty, C., Mukherjee, A., Qiu, L. & Vamivakas, A. N. Electrically tunable valley polarization and valley coherence in monolayer WSe2 embedded in a van der Waals heterostructure. Opt. Mater. Express 9, 1479 (2019)

    2019

  51. [66]

    & Vamivakas, A

    Qiu, L., Chakraborty, C., Dhara, S. & Vamivakas, A. N. Room-temperature valley coherence in a polaritonic system. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–5 (2019)

    2019

  52. [67]

    & Furthmüller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996)

    1996

  53. [68]

    & Furthmüller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 54, 11169–11186 (1996)

    1996

  54. [69]

    & Sham, L

    Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965)

    1965

  55. [70]

    Projector augmented-wave method

    P.E., B. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994)

    1994

  56. [71]

    Xiang, H. et al. Quantum spin Hall insulator phase in monolayer WTe2 by uniaxial strain. AIP Adv. 6, 095005 (2016)

    2016

  57. [72]

    & Testa, A

    Baroni, S., Giannozzi, P. & Testa, A. Green’s-function approach to linear response in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1861–1864 (1987). Acknowledgements P.M.V. and S.M.O. acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DMR -1748650, the George Mason...

    1987

  58. [73]

    N., Izmaylov, A

    Brothers, E. N., Izmaylov, A. F., Normand, J. O., Barone, V. & Scuseria, G. E. Accurate solid- state band gaps via screened hybrid electronic structure calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 011102 (2008)

    2008

  59. [74]

    Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides

    Ramasubramaniam, A. Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 86, 115409 (2012)

    2012

  60. [75]

    Castellanos-Gomez, A. et al. Deterministic transfer of two-dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Mater. 1, 011002 (2014)

    2014

  61. [76]

    Squeegee

    Rosenberger, M. R. et al. Nano-“Squeegee” for the Creation of Clean 2D Material Interfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 10379–10387 (2018)

    2018

  62. [77]

    Chow, C. M. et al. Unusual Exciton–Phonon Interactions at van der Waals Engineered Interfaces. Nano Lett. 17, 1194–1199 (2017)

    2017

  63. [78]

    Jin, C. et al. Interlayer electron–phonon coupling in WSe2/hBN heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 13, 127–131 (2017)

    2017

  64. [79]

    Du, L. et al. Strongly enhanced exciton-phonon coupling in two-dimensional WSe2. Phys. Rev. B 97, 235145 (2018)

    2018

  65. [80]

    Arora, A. et al. Excitonic resonances in thin films of WSe2 : from monolayer to bulk material. Nanoscale 7, 10421–10429 (2015)

    2015

  66. [81]

    Wang, G. et al. Giant Enhancement of the Optical Second-Harmonic Emission of WSe2 Monolayers by Laser Excitation at Exciton Resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 1–6 (2015)

    2015

  67. [82]

    Courtade, E. et al. Charged excitons in monolayer WSe2: Experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. B 96, 1–12 (2017)

    2017

  68. [83]

    Meng, Y. et al. Excitonic Complexes and Emerging Interlayer Electron–Phonon Coupling in BN Encapsulated Monolayer Semiconductor Alloy: WS0.6Se1.4. Nano Lett. 19, 299–307 (2019)

    2019

  69. [84]

    Chen, S.-Y. et al. Superior Valley Polarization and Coherence of 2s Excitons in Monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 046402 (2018)

    2018

  70. [85]

    Manca, M. et al. Enabling valley selective exciton scattering in monolayer WSe2 through upconversion. Nat. Commun. 8, 14927 (2017)

    2017

  71. [86]

    Kang, J., Tongay, S., Zhou, J., Li, J. & Wu, J. Band offsets and heterostructures of two- dimensional semiconductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 012111 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.