Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH$_6$

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that Im-3m-YH6, synthesized at 166–172 GPa, superconducts at 224 K with an upper critical field of 116–158 T and an isotope coefficient of 0.4, and that these properties deviate from conventional Migdal-Eliashberg and…

desk verdict YH6 paper reports a plausible but not yet airtight 224 K superconducting transition in multiphase samples; the real novelty is the experimental characterization and the SCDFT mismatch, while the 'beyond conventional' claim needs a firmer phase assignment. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01534 v2 pith:RVFY7EAI submitted 2019-08-05 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

Ivan A. Troyan , Dmitrii V. Semenok , Alexander G. Kvashnin , Andrey V. Sadakov , Oleg A. Sobolevskiy , Vladimir M. Pudalov , Anna G. Ivanova , Vitali B. Prakapenka
show 11 more authors
Eran Greenberg Alexander G.Gavriliuk Viktor V. Struzhkin Aitor Bergara Ion Errea Raffaello Bianco Matteo Calandra Francesco Mauri Lorenzo Monacelli Ryosuke Akashi Artem R. Oganov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el PACS 74.70.-b74.25.Op62.50.-p
keywords yttriumhexahydridehigh-pressuresuperconductivityIm-3m-YH6uppercriticalfieldisotopeeffectMigdal-EliashbergtheorySCDFTcurrentdensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the synthesis of yttrium hexahydride (Im-3m-YH6) at 166–172 GPa and claims it becomes superconducting at 224 K, with an upper critical field of 116–158 T, an isotope coefficient of 0.4, and a possible critical current density above 3500 A/mm². These numbers matter because they are out of step with the standard phonon-mediated picture: the measured transition temperature is lower than predicted, the critical field is two to two-and-a-half times larger than calculated, and a parameter-free calculation gives a transition temperature of 160 K, a full 64 K below the experiment. The authors interpret the gaps as evidence that something beyond the conventional Migdal-Eliashberg and BCS theories, most likely an unusually strong Coulomb repulsion and possibly missing anharmonic or vertex effects, operates in this compound. If correct, YH6 becomes a confirmed hydride superconductor whose behavior constrains any theory of high-pressure hydrogen-rich superconductors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the sodalite-like clathrate structure of Im-3m-YH6, a cubic arrangement of yttrium atoms forming cages around hydrogen atoms, synthesized at megabar pressures. The argument is carried by three linked measurements: the resistance drop at 224 K in four-electrode diamond anvil cells, a deuterium isotope shift to 170 K in YD6 giving an isotope coefficient of 0.4, and magnetotransport in fields up to 16 T that yields the upper critical field via Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg and Ginzburg-Landau interpolation. On the theory side, the paper uses isotropic Migdal-Eliashberg equations with a Coulomb pseudopotential, parameter-free SCDFT gap equations, and anharmonic Eliashberg functions from the stochastic self-consistent harmonic approximation to show that anharmonicity lowers Tc by about 25 K and that only very large μ* values reproduce the measured Tc and isotope coefficient.

What would settle it

Measure the resistance of a sample consisting of phase-pure Im-3m-YH6, verified by X-ray diffraction with no unidentified reflections, and check whether zero resistance appears at 224 K and whether the upper critical field falls between 116 and 158 T; if the transition vanishes or shifts when YH4 and YH7 are absent, the attribution to YH6 fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Im-3m-YH6, synthesized by laser-heating yttrium in ammonia borane at 166–172 GPa, is a superconductor with a critical temperature of 224 K, an upper critical field Bc2(0) of 116–158 T, an isotope coefficient of 0.4 in the deuterated analogue, and a critical current density that may exceed 3500 A/mm² at 0 K. The paper argues that these measured properties deviate from conventional Migdal-Eliashberg and BCS predictions: the observed Tc is below the 250–285 K range expected from previous calculations, the upper critical field is two to two-and-a-half times larger than the calculated ~60 T, and the parameter-free superconducting density functional theory yields 160 K, about 64 K below the measured transition. The authors attribute the deviations to an unusually large Coulomb repulsion, quantified by a Coulomb pseudopotential μ* = 0.19–0.22, and suggest that anharmonicity, higher-order electron-phonon effects, or anisotropic pairing may be needed to reconcile theory with experiment.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the resistance drop at 224 K comes from the Im-3m-YH6 phase itself, even though the samples also contain YH4 and YH7 phases and the paper notes that the YH6 transition can appear as an upward feature in R(T,H) due to shunting in fine-grained samples.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • YH6 joins LaH10 and H3S as a confirmed high-pressure hydride superconductor, with a transition temperature well above that of YBCO and comparable to commercial NbTi and YBCO in critical current density.
  • Any successful theory of superhydride superconductivity must reproduce both a Tc near 224 K at 166–172 GPa and an upper critical field of 116–158 T, something standard isotropic Eliashberg theory with μ* = 0.1–0.15 does not do.
  • The isotope coefficient of 0.4 supports phonon-assisted pairing, but its deviation from the BCS value of 0.5 marks the coupling as not fully conventional.
  • The high upper critical field implies a short coherence length of roughly 14–17 Å and a Sommerfeld constant N(EF)(1+λ) at least four times the DFT value, sharpening constraints on the electronic structure at the Fermi level.
  • If the critical current extrapolation holds, the paper's results open a practical route toward using high-pressure hydrides in superconducting electronics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 224 K transition is confirmed on phase-pure Im-3m-YH6, the compound becomes a sharper test of missing physics—such as vertex corrections, Debye-Waller terms, or anisotropic pairing—than LaH10, where the gap between theory and experiment is only 20–30 K.
  • Because the samples contain YH4 and YH7 phases, the paper's own note that the YH6 transition can appear as an upward feature in R(T,H) due to shunting leaves open the possibility that the observed transition is affected by phase segregation; single-phase transport measurements would settle this.
  • The unusually large Coulomb pseudopotential needed to fit the data implies that small changes in screening, for example through doping or slight off-stoichiometry, could shift Tc substantially; this is testable by synthesizing YH6 at several pressures and measuring Tc and the isotope coefficient.
  • The measured critical field being two to two-and-a-half times the calculated value changes the estimated coherence length, which in turn affects the vortex-pinning model used to extrapolate the critical current; a direct low-temperature measurement of Jc on a phase-pure sample would anchor that extrapolation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the high-pressure synthesis of yttrium hexahydride in the Im-3m structure and claims a superconducting transition at Tc = 224 K (218 K in a second cell) at 166-172 GPa, an isotope coefficient of 0.4 in YD6, an upper critical field Bc2(0) = 116-158 T, and a critical current density that may exceed 3500 A/mm2. The authors combine electrical transport, magnetotransport, XRD, Raman, and first-principles calculations (Migdal-Eliashberg, SCDFT, and SSCHA anharmonic phonons) to argue that YH6 is a high-temperature superconductor whose properties depart from conventional phonon-mediated superconductivity, in particular through an anomalously large Coulomb repulsion.

Significance. If the phase assignment and transport interpretation are correct, this is a significant experimental confirmation of a predicted high-pressure hydride superconductor and one of the first demonstrations of very high upper critical fields and critical currents in this materials class. The manuscript is also valuable for its detailed theoretical treatment: the anharmonic SSCHA calculations, the SCDFT calculations, and the extensive supplementary information on structural stability and superconducting parameters are substantive. However, the central claim is load-bearing on a phase assignment that is complicated by multiphase samples, unidentified XRD reflections, and the authors' own explicit admission that the YH6 transition can appear as a shunting artifact. The theoretical "anomaly" is also partly constructed by fitting μ* to the measured Tc. These issues prevent the paper, in its present form, from definitively establishing Im-3m-YH6 as the origin of the 224 K transition.

major comments (4)
  1. [Figure 1 and SI Methods (Magnetotransport measurements)] The assignment of the 224 K transition to Im-3m-YH6 is not established. The transport samples K1 and M1 contain at least two hydride phases, the Le Bail refinements in Fig. 1 and Fig. S8 leave unidentified reflections marked by asterisks, and the SI explicitly states that the YH6 transition can appear as an upward feature of the R(T,H) curves due to the shunting effect in fine-grained samples. The asterisked reflections were not tested against the YH9 phases (P-1 or F-43m) that the authors' own convex-hull calculations stabilize at laser-heating temperatures (Fig. 2d), and YH9 has been reported to superconduct near 243 K (Ref. 18). Accordingly, the zero-resistance feature in DAC K1 and the resistive feature in DAC M1 cannot be unambiguously assigned to YH6; a YH9 or other unidentified phase, or a percolation path through it, could account for the data. Because the phase assignment underlies Tc, the isotope coefficient, Bc2, Jc, and the theoretical comparison, this is the central load-bearing gap.
  2. [Results and discussion, Fig. 3(e,f) and Fig. 4] The claimed anomalies in Bc2(0) and Jc rest on model extrapolations rather than direct measurements. Bc2(0) = 116-158 T is obtained by WHH and Ginzburg-Landau extrapolation of data taken only up to 16 T near Tc (Fig. 3f), and the estimate N(EF)(1+lambda) = 7.2-13.3 eV^-1 f.u.^-1 is derived from that extrapolation through the Carbotte formula; the claimed 2-2.5-fold discrepancy with the calculated ~60 T therefore inherits the model uncertainty. Similarly, Jc > 3500 A/mm2 is obtained by extrapolating I-V data with an assumed sample cross-section of 10x50 micrometers and a single-vortex pinning model, while the Ginzburg-Landau model yields 2000 A/mm2; the comparison with NbTi and YBCO in Fig. 4d is thus an order-of-magnitude estimate. These caveats should be stated explicitly and the word "anomalous" in the abstract should be qualified.
  3. [Results and discussion, ME/SCDFT comparison and Table S8] The conclusion that YH6 shows an "unusually large impact of the Coulomb repulsion" is partly constructed by fitting, not inferred from an independent measurement. The text states that agreement with the experimental Tc and isotope coefficient is obtained only when μ*(6 Ry) = 0.19-0.22 is used in the isotropic Migdal-Eliashberg equations; since Table S8 uses μ* as an input, this agreement is by construction. The parameter-free SCDFT calculation gives Tc = 160 K, but the 64 K discrepancy could stem from the SCDFT kernels, the anharmonic alpha2F treatment, or the sample composition uncertainty noted above, rather than from physics beyond the Migdal-Eliashberg approximation. As written, the abstract's claim of "notable departures from the conventional Migdal-Eliashberg and BCS theories" overstates the evidence.
  4. [Results and discussion, isotope effect and Fig. 3(a)] The isotope coefficient alpha = 0.4 is measured on a multiphase deuterated sample (D1) whose phase composition is not characterized by XRD in the manuscript. If the 224 K transition cannot be unambiguously assigned to YH6, the YD6 transition at 170 K and the resulting alpha = ln(224/170)/ln(2) are not a reliable measure of the YH6 phonon content. At minimum, the XRD pattern and resistance data for D1 should be provided and shown to be dominated by Im-3m-YD6 before the isotope coefficient is used to support phonon-assisted superconductivity.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References and text near the ME/SCDFT comparison] The citation ranges "Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer25-27" and "Migdal-Eliashberg30,31" are inconsistent with the reference list, where Cooper is Ref. 27, Bardeen are Refs. 28-29, Migdal is Ref. 30, and Eliashberg is Ref. 31; all superscript numbers should be rechecked.
  2. [Figure 3 and Figure S13 captions] The main-text Fig. 3 caption states that critical temperatures were determined at the onset of the resistance jump, while the Fig. S13 caption states that they were determined at a 50% resistance drop; this inconsistency can affect the reported dBc2/dT and should be resolved.
  3. [Supplementary Eq. S3] Equation S3, the Allen-Dynes isotope coefficient formula, is garbled in the supplied supplementary information and must be typeset cleanly before publication.
  4. [Figure 3(c,d) caption] The phrase "even and odd values of the magnetic field" is unclear; presumably the authors mean the field sweep direction, and the caption should say so explicitly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Migdal–Eliashberg μ* is tuned to reproduce the measured Tc and then cited as evidence of anomalously large Coulomb repulsion; the SCDFT and Bc2 anomalies are independent, so the circularity is partial.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results and discussion, paragraph comparing experiment with Migdal–Eliashberg theory; see also Conclusions and Supplementary Table S8]
    "To match the experimental data, including isotope coefficient αexp = 0.4, unusually high values of the Coulomb pseudopotential µ*(6 Ry) = 0.19–0.22 are necessary."

    In the isotropic Migdal–Eliashberg calculation, μ* is the adjustable Coulomb pseudopotential, not a first-principles quantity. The paper states that μ* is chosen so that the calculated Tc matches the experimentally measured 224 K (and the isotope coefficient), and then presents the resulting high μ* as evidence that YH6 has an anomalously large Coulomb repulsion. This inference is circular to the extent that the fitted value is determined by the target data it is supposed to explain. The circularity is partial, however, because the paper also reports a parameter-free SCDFT result (Tc = 160 K, μ = 0.187) and an independently measured upper critical field anomaly, so the overall central claim does not reduce solely to this fit.

full rationale

The experimental discovery claim is measured, not circular: the paper reports zero resistance in DAC K1, a 9-fold resistance drop in DAC M1, an isotope shift with αexp = 0.4, magnetotransport in fields up to 16 T, and V–I critical-current data. The weakness that the 224 K feature may belong to a coexisting phase (YH4, YH7, or unidentified YH9-like reflections) is a correctness and phase-assignment risk, not a circularity. The one genuinely circular step is the Migdal–Eliashberg μ* inference: μ* is the free parameter tuned to reproduce the measured Tc (and α), so describing the resulting μ* = 0.19–0.22 as unusually large Coulomb repulsion is a fitted parameter used as evidence for an anomaly. This step is partial because the paper additionally presents a parameter-free SCDFT calculation giving Tc = 160 K and μ = 0.187, and a measured Bc2(0) = 116–158 T versus a calculated ~60 T; both of these are independent of the fitted μ*. Self-citations to USPEX, SSCHA, and prior hydride work are methodological and are not load-bearing in a circular way. The score of 4 reflects a genuine but non-central circular step while acknowledging that the main experimental and SCDFT/Bc2 content has independent support.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger shows two fitted parameters: mu* chosen to match Tc and the isotope effect, and Dew-Hughes pinning parameters chosen to match pinning-force scaling. The main assumptions are the phase attribution of the transport signal, the validity of BCS/ME/SCDFT/SSCHA approximations, and the WHH/GL and single-vortex extrapolations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Coulomb pseudopotential mu*(6 Ry) = 0.19-0.22 (also 0.1-0.15 in the standard range)
    Chosen to make the Migdal-Eliashberg Tc match the experimental Tc = 224 K and the isotope coefficient 0.4; the claimed unusually large Coulomb repulsion is inferred from this fitted parameter. See Results and Table S8.
  • Dew-Hughes pinning parameters p and q = p = 0.5, q = 2, h_max = 0.2
    Fitted to the normalized pinning-force data in Supplementary Fig. S14 and used to justify the single-vortex model for extrapolating Jc to 4.2 K.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The superconducting pairing in YH6 can be described within Migdal-Eliashberg or BCS theory with electron-phonon coupling and a Coulomb pseudopotential mu*.
    Used throughout the theoretical comparison (Results, Tables S7-S8). The paper questions this assumption but relies on it to interpret the discrepancy.
  • domain assumption The Im-3m-YH6 phase assignment from Le Bail refinement of the XRD pattern is correct despite multiphase samples and unidentified reflections.
    Figure 1 and Supplementary Methods; this assumption is central to attributing the superconducting transition to YH6.
  • domain assumption DFT-PBE and SCDFT with RPA screening give reliable electronic structure, phonons, and Tc for YH6 at 165 GPa.
    Supplementary Methods (USPEX, Quantum ESPRESSO, SCDFT conditions in Table S2); required for the claimed 160 K SCDFT prediction and the electron-phonon coupling values.
  • domain assumption The single-vortex pinning model and Dew-Hughes scaling describe the critical current over the full temperature range down to 4.2 K.
    Used to extrapolate Jc from data above 190 K to 1.75 A and 3500 A/mm2 at 4.2 K (Figure 4, Supplementary Fig. S14).
  • standard math The Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg and Ginzburg-Landau extrapolation formulas give the upper critical field Bc2(0) from data up to 16 T.
    Used to obtain 116-158 T (Figure 3e-f, Supplementary Fig. S13).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH$_6$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RVFY7EAI

@misc{pith2026190801534,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH$_6$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RVFY7EAI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01534}
}
abstract

Pressure-stabilized hydrides are a new rapidly growing class of high-temperature superconductors which is believed to be described within the conventional phonon-mediated mechanism of coupling. Here we report the synthesis of yttrium hexahydride Im3m-YH$_6$ that demonstrates the superconducting transition with T$_c$ = 224 K at 166 GPa, much lower than the theoretically predicted (>270 K). The measured upper critical magnetic field B$_c$$_2$(0) of YH$_6$ was found to be 116-158 T, which is 2-2.5 times larger than the calculated value. A pronounced shift of T$_c$ in yttrium deuteride YD$_6$ with the isotope coefficient 0.4 supports the phonon-assisted superconductivity. Current-voltage measurements showed that the critical current I$_c$ and its density J$_c$ may exceed 1.75 A and 3500 A/mm$^2$ at 0 K, respectively, which is comparable with the parameters of commercial superconductors, such as NbTi and YBCO. The superconducting density functional theory (SCDFT) and anharmonic calculations suggest unusually large impact of the Coulomb repulsion in this compound. The results indicate notable departures of the superconducting properties of the discovered YH$_6$ from the conventional Migdal-Eliashberg and Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Prakapenka, V

    Prescher, C. & Prakapenka, V. B. DIOPTAS: a program for reduction of two-dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High Pressure Research 35, 223–230 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    & Palatinus, L

    Petříček, V., Dušek, M. & Palatinus, L. Crystallographic Computing System JANA2006: General features. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials 229, 345–352 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Bail, A. L. Whole powder pattern decomposition methods and applications: A retrospection. Powder Diffraction 20, 316–326 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Prakapenka, V. B. et al. Advanced flat top las er heating system for high pressure research at GSECARS: application to the melting behavior of germanium. High Pressure Research 28, 225–235 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    & Kawamura, H

    Akahama, Y. & Kawamura, H. Pressure calibration of diamond anvil Raman gauge to 410 GPa. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 215, 012195 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Holtgrewe, N., Greenberg, E., Prescher, C., Prakapenka, V. B. & Goncharov, A. F. Advanced integrated optical spectroscopy system for diamond anvil cell studies at GSECARS. High Pressure Research 39, 457–470 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Eremets, M. I. Megabar high-pressure cells for Raman measurements. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 34, 515– 518 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Parvanov, V. M. et al. Materials for hydrogen storage: structure and dynamics of borane ammonia complex. Dalton Trans. 4514–4522 (2008) doi:10.1039/B718138H

    work page doi:10.1039/b718138h 2008

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Flux pinning mechanisms in type II superconductors

    Dew-Hughes, D. Flux pinning mechanisms in type II superconductors. The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics 30, 293–305 (1974)

    1974

  2. [10]

    Oganov, A. R. & Glass, C. W. Crystal structure prediction usin g ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244704 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    R., Lyakhov, A

    Oganov, A. R., Lyakhov, A. O. & Valle, M. How Evolutionary Crystal Structure Prediction Works —and Why. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 227–237 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    O., Oganov, A

    Lyakhov, A. O., Oganov, A. R., Stokes, H. T. & Zhu, Q. New developments in evolutionary structure prediction algorithm USPEX. Computer Physics Communications 184, 1172–1182 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    V., Blatov, V

    Bushlanov, P. V., Blatov, V. A. & Oganov, A. R. Topology-based crystal structure generator. Computer Physics Communications 236, 1–7 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    & Kohn, W

    Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 136, B864–B871 (1964)

    1964

  7. [15]

    & Sham, L

    Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self -consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 140, A1133–A1138 (1965)

    1965

  8. [16]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical review letters 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  9. [17]

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994)

    1994

  10. [18]

    & Joubert, D

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented -wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999)

    1999

  11. [19]

    & Furthmüller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996)

    1996

  12. [20]

    & Hafner, J

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993)

    1993

  13. [21]

    & Hafner, J

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994)

    1994

  14. [22]

    V., Kvashnin, A

    Semenok, D. V., Kvashnin, A. G., Kruglov, I. A. & Oganov, A. R. Actinium Hydrides AcH10, AcH12, and AcH16 as High-Temperature Conventional Superconductors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1920–1926 (2018). S23

    2018

  15. [23]

    G., Semenok, D

    Kvashnin, A. G., Semenok, D. V., Kruglov, I. A., Wrona, I. A. & Oganov, A. R. High -Temperature Superconductivity in Th -H System at Pressure Conditions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10, 43809 – 43816 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    & Tanaka, I

    Togo, A. & Tanaka, I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scripta Materialia 108, 1–5 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    & Tanaka, I

    Togo, A., Oba, F. & Tanaka, I. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B 78, 134106 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a Modular and Open -Source Software Project for Quantum Simulations of Materials. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    & Giannozzi, P

    Baroni, S., de Gironcoli, S., Dal Corso, A. & Giannozzi, P. Phonons and Related Crystal Properties from Density- Functional Perturbation Theory. Reviews of modern Physics 73, 515–562 (2001)

    2001

  21. [29]

    Eliashberg, G. M. Interactions between Electrons and Lattice Vibrations in a Superconductor. JETP 11, 696– 702 (1959)

    1959

  22. [30]

    Allen, P. B. & Dynes, R. C. Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed. Phys. Rev. B 12, 905–922 (1975)

    1975

  23. [31]

    Lüders, M. et al. Ab initio theory of superconductivity. I. Density functional formalism and approximate functionals. Phys. Rev. B 72, 024545 (2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    Marques, M. A. L. et al. Ab initio theory of superconductivity. II. Application to elemental metals. Phys. Rev. B 72, 024546 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    Kruglov, I. A. et al. Superconductivity of LaH10 and LaH16 polyhydrides. Phys. Rev. B. 101, 024508 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    & Arita, R

    Akashi, R. & Arita, R. Density functional theory for superconductors with particle -hole asymmetric electronic structure. Phys. Rev. B 88, 014514 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    & Arita, R

    Akashi, R., Kawamura, M., Tsuneyuki, S., Nomura, Y. & Arita, R. First -principles study of the pressur e and crystal-structure dependences of the superconducting transition temperature in compressed sulfur hydrides. Phys. Rev. B 91, 224513 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Migdal, A. B. Interaction between electrons and lattice vibrations in a normal metal. JETP 34, 996–1001 (1958)

    1958

  29. [37]

    Scalapino, D. J. The Electron Phonon Interaction and Strong Coupling. in Superconductivity: Part 1 (In Two Parts) (ed. Parks, R. D.) vol. 1 (Dekker, New York, 1969)

    1969

  30. [38]

    Schrieffer, J. R. Theory Of Superconductivity. vol. 1 (Perseus Books, 1999)

    1999

  31. [39]

    Elementary Excitations in Solids : Lectures on Phonons, Electrons, and Plasmons

    Pines, D. Elementary Excitations in Solids : Lectures on Phonons, Electrons, and Plasmons. (Perseus, 1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    & Freeman, A

    Rath, J. & Freeman, A. J. Generalized magnetic susceptibilities in metals: Application of the analytic tetrahedron linear energy method to Sc. Phys. Rev. B 11, 2109–2117 (1975)

    1975

  33. [41]

    & Mauri, F

    Errea, I., Calandra, M. & Mauri, F. Anharmonic free energies and phonon dispersions from the stochastic self - consistent harmonic approximation: Application to platinum and palladium hydrides. Phys. Rev. B 89, 064302 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    S., Degtyarenko, N

    Grishakov, K. S., Degtyarenko, N. N. & Mazur, E. A. Electron, Phonon, and Superconducting Properties of Yttrium and Sulfur Hydrides under High Pressures. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 128, 105–114 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Heil, C., di Cataldo, S., Bachelet, G. B. & Boeri, L. Superconductivity in sodalite-like yttrium hydride clathrates. Phys. Rev. B 99, 220502 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Li, Y. et al. Pressure-stabilized superconductive yttrium hydrides. Scientific Reports 5, 09948 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    I., Hoffmann, R., Ashcroft, N

    Liu, H., Naumov, I. I., Hoffmann, R., Ashcroft, N. W. & Hemley, R. J. Potential high -Tc superconducting lanthanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure. PNAS 114, 6990–6995 (2017). S24

    2017

  38. [46]

    Anharmonic effects and optical spectra in superconducting hydrogen

    Bergara, A. Anharmonic effects and optical spectra in superconducting hydrogen. in Proceedings of 56th EHPRG Meeting (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Ginzburg, V. L. & Landau, L. D. On the Theory of superconductivity. Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 20, 1064–1082 (1950)

    1950

  40. [48]

    Theory of the Superfluidity of Helium II

    Landau, L. Theory of the Superfluidity of Helium II. Phys. Rev. 60, 356–358 (1941)

    1941

  41. [49]

    P., Eremets, M

    Drozdov, A. P., Eremets, M. I., Troyan, I. A., Ksenofontov, V. & Shylin, S. I. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature 525, 73–76 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Carbotte, J. P. Properties of boson-exchange superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 1027–1157 (1990)

    1990

  43. [51]

    & Pickett, W

    Quan, Y. & Pickett, W. E. Van Hove singularities and spectral smearing in high -temperature superconducting H3S. Phys. Rev. B 93, 104526 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate

    Hill, R. The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 65, 349 (1952)

    1952

  45. [53]

    Anderson, O. L. A simplified method for calculating the debye temperature from elastic constants. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 24, 909–917 (1963)

    1963

  46. [54]

    Ravindran, P. et al. Density functional theory for calculation of elastic properties of orthorhombic crystals: Application to TiSi2. Journal of Applied Physics 84, 4891–4904 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.