Force Balance Approach for Advanced Approximations in Density Functional Theories

Angel Rubio; Iris Theophilou; Markus Penz; Mary-Leena M. Tchenkoue; Michael Ruggenthaler

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 66 references

Force Balance Approach for Advanced Approximations in Density Functional Theories

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Force-balance equations exactly determine exchange-correlation potentials without energy functionals.

desk verdict A careful, honest derivation of force-balance relations for xc potentials in DFT/CDFT/TDCDFT, with a real flaw in the proposed local-exchange approximation that a referee should catch. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02733 v2 pith:FL7TGW6G submitted 2019-08-07 physics.chem-ph cond-mat.otherquant-ph

Mary-Leena M. Tchenkoue , Markus Penz , Iris Theophilou , Michael Ruggenthaler , Angel Rubio This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.chem-phcond-mat.otherquant-ph

keywords densityfunctionaltheoryexchange-correlationpotentialforcebalanceequationcurrenttime-dependentoptimizedeffectivelocalapproximationSlaterexchange

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that exchange-correlation (xc) potentials in density-functional theories can be determined directly by subtracting the force-balance equations of the interacting and Kohn–Sham systems, instead of differentiating an energy or action functional. The central exact relation is $n\nabla v_{Hxc} = F_T[\Phi] - F_T[\Psi] - F_W[\Psi]$, with an analogous evolution equation for the xc vector potential in time-dependent current-density functional theory. These relations are pointwise, so they give orbital-dependent xc potentials without the numerically costly optimized-effective-potential step and without the differentiability and causality problems of functional-based theories. The same framework covers ground-state DFT, TDDFT, CDFT, and TDCDFT, and in the homogeneous limit its exchange-type approximation reduces to exchange LDA and Slater Xα. If correct, this gives a constructive route to advanced xc potentials that bypasses the usual functional machinery.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the force-balance equation, the equation of motion for the physical current density, obtained from the equation of motion of the first-order reduced density matrix. Its two internal terms are the kinetic force $F_T[\Psi]$ and the interaction force $F_W[\Psi]$; subtracting them between the interacting and Kohn–Sham systems exposes the xc potential. A Helmholtz decomposition of the combined force term separates longitudinal (scalar potential) and transverse (vector potential) contributions. For the vector potential the determining relation is an evolution equation, so any imbalance in the forces is absorbed by $\partial_t A_{xc}$.

What would settle it

Compute both sides of Eq. (21) for a small inhomogeneous system using near-exact interacting and Kohn–Sham wave functions: if $F_T[\Phi] - F_T[\Psi] - F_W[\Psi]$ divided by $n$ is not a gradient field, the exact pointwise relation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that equality of the densities and currents between interacting and non-interacting systems turns the current-density equations of motion into exact determining equations for the xc potentials. For static scalar potentials, subtracting the two zero-force balance equations gives Eq. (21), which states that $n\nabla v_{Hxc}$ equals the difference of kinetic internal forces plus the interaction force. In the time-dependent current-density setting, subtracting the equations of motion gives Eq. (31), and with a Helmholtz decomposition this separates into a scalar potential determined by the longitudinal internal force and an evolution equation for $A_{xc}$ from the transverse part. These relations do not require the xc potentials to be functional derivatives; they exist whenever a matching Kohn–Sham system can be found. The exchange approximation obtained by replacing the interacting wave function with the Slater-determinant Kohn–Sham wave function reduces to exchange-only LDA in the uniform-gas limit, with the Slater Xα parameter reinterpreted as the position of the Taylor-expansion point.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a density-potential mapping exists for every setting used; in particular, for ground-state CDFT with the physical current density the paper only assumes such a map, and if that map fails the Kohn–Sham construction matching physical currents collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A direct, pointwise route to $v_{Hxc}$ exists that does not require evaluating any energy or action functional.
Orbital-dependent exchange potentials can be constructed without the optimized-effective-potential procedure, at least in the approximations considered.
The TDCDFT xc vector potential satisfies an evolution equation, which automatically carries memory effects and absorbs unbalanced forces.
The different xc potentials of DFT, TDDFT, CDFT, and TDCDFT become manifestations of one force-balance relation, with gauge choices distinguishing the cases.
In a homogeneous system the exchange approximation reduces to exchange-only LDA and exposes Slater Xα as a midpoint-parameter choice.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One consequence the paper leaves implicit is that if the ground-state CDFT map with physical currents is later established, Eq. (31) would also supply a non-adiabatic xc vector potential with memory, so the approach could be benchmarked against existing memory approximations in linear response.
The reinterpretation of the Slater α as the expansion point λ suggests a concrete test: compare exchange potentials from Eq. (52) with exact-exchange optimized-effective-potential results on inhomogeneous atoms; the optimal λ need not be 1/2.
Because the xc potentials come from forces rather than an energy, total energies must be obtained a posteriori from the Kohn–Sham orbitals; whether a parent energy functional exists, and whether thermochemical consistency holds, remains an open question the paper acknowledges.
The same subtraction strategy could be carried over to coupled matter–photon systems, where the vector potential includes quantized modes; testing it would require building the corresponding photon-mode force-balance terms.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does something genuinely useful: it takes the force-balance equation for the current density and turns it into exact, pointwise determining relations for the xc potentials in DFT, CDFT, and TDCDFT, avoiding the OEP bottleneck and the usual energy/action functional pathologies. The core scalar-DFT relation, Eq. (21), is not new—the paper credits Tokatly and Ruggenthaler–Bauer—but the systematic extension to physical- and paramagnetic-current CDFT, the gauge analysis, the Helmholtz decomposition, and the evolution equation for Axc are a real contribution. The derivations are clear and the authors are honest about the places where they rely on unproven density-potential maps, especially for ground-state physical-current CDFT. They also flag the loss of direct total-energy access. That is good scientific citizenship.

The exact part holds up. The proposed local-exchange approximation does not, at least not as stated. Eq. (23), n∇vHx = -FW[Φ], requires FW[Φ]/n to be a pure gradient. For a Slater determinant, FW[Φ] = -n∇vH + (1/2)∇A, so the exchange-force piece is (1/(2n))∇A, whose curl is -(1/(2n^2))∇n×∇A, generally nonzero in three dimensions. Thus no scalar local vHx solves Eq. (23) for a generic inhomogeneous system. The paper says Eqs. (21) and (27) carry the same information and lead to the same approximations, but that is only true for the exact FHxc, whose curl-free nature is guaranteed. For the approximate replacement FW[Φ], the divergence-based Poisson form is a different approximation—one that discards the transverse part of FW[Φ]. The stress-test note is right, and it affects the simplest setting of the paper, not just the CDFT extensions.

The LDA reduction in Sec. IV is also softer than advertised. The free parameter λ enters as where you expand the density; λ=1/2 recovers standard exchange LDA, but the derivation does not determine λ from first principles. The connection to Slater Xα via λ=3α/4 is nice but it reinterprets the empirical parameter rather than fixing it. Minor, but worth saying.

There is no numerical validation, so the practical value is unproven. Still, the exact relations and the framework deserve referee time. The paper is well-written, properly cites prior work, and the central exact derivation is solid. A serious referee should push on the well-definedness of Eq. (23), ask whether the divergence form is the intended replacement, and request at least one illustrative numerical example.

Recommendation: send it to peer review, but expect revision on the local-exchange approximation.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a constructive route to exchange-correlation (xc) potentials in density-functional theories based on equations of motion for current quantities (force balance equations) rather than energy or action functionals. Starting from the equation of motion of the first-order reduced density matrix, the authors derive the current-density equation of motion (force balance equation) for both interacting and non-interacting Kohn-Sham systems. Subtracting these equations yields exact pointwise determining relations for the xc potentials: Eq. (21) for ground-state DFT, Eq. (27) for TDDFT, Eq. (31) for CDFT/TDCDFT with the physical current density, and Eq. (41)/(45) for paramagnetic CDFT. The paper then introduces local-exchange approximations by replacing the interacting internal forces with those of a Slater determinant, and shows in the homogeneous limit that these approximations reduce to a family of LDA-type exchange potentials, recovering exchange-only LDA and connecting to Slater's Xα method. The approach is advertised as avoiding the optimized-effective-potential (OEP) procedure and the differentiability and causality issues of energy- and action-based functionals.

Significance. If the proposed exact relations and approximations are valid, the paper offers a genuinely different route to orbital-dependent xc potentials that bypasses energy functionals and OEP, with potential consequences for time-dependent and current-carrying systems. The algebraic derivations are careful, the exact relations reproduce known zero-force and zero-torque constraints, and the paper gives useful clarification of the interrelations between the xc potentials of DFT, TDDFT, CDFT, and TDCDFT. However, the central constructive claim is weakened by two load-bearing issues: the pointwise local-exchange approximation is not well-defined for generic inhomogeneous systems because the approximate force is not curl-free, and the ground-state CDFT section with the physical current relies on an explicitly unproven density-potential mapping. These issues do not invalidate the exact formal relations but they do require substantial revision of the proposed approximation scheme and of the scope of the CDFT claims.

major comments (2)

[Sec. III.A, Eqs. (23), (27), (28)] The local-exchange approximation n∇v_Hx = -F_W[Φ] in Eq. (23) is not well-defined for generic inhomogeneous systems. For a Kohn-Sham Slater determinant, Eq. (50) gives F_W[Φ] = -n∇v_H + (1/2)∇A(r) with A(r) = ∫ w(r-r2)|ρ^(1)(r,r2)|^2 dr2, so F_W[Φ]/n = -∇v_H + (1/(2n))∇A, whose curl is -(1/(2n^2))∇n × ∇A and is generically nonzero. Hence no scalar v_Hx satisfies Eq. (23) pointwise. The statement that in the static case Eqs. (21) and (27) share exactly the same information and lead to the same approximations is only true for the exact F_Hxc, whose curl-free nature follows from n∇v_Hxc = -F_Hxc; it does not carry over to the replacement F_W[Φ]. If the intended construction is the divergence-based Eq. (28), that is a distinct approximation that discards the transverse part of F_W[Φ] and should be stated explicitly as such. This issue affects standard ground-state DFT and is independent of the density-potential mapping assumptions.
[Sec. III.B, sentence after Eq. (30)] The exact determining relation (31) for ground-state physical-current CDFT relies on an unproven density-potential mapping. The paper states that it 'tacitly assumes that an appropriate density-potential mapping exists' for the physical current density in the static case. Unlike the time-dependent case (which rests on Vignale's theorem) and the paramagnetic-current case (Refs. 49, 50, 41), no ground-state Hohenberg-Kohn-type theorem for the physical current density is available to date; the cited positive examples (MDFT, QEDFT, kinetic-energy DFT on a lattice) concern different settings. If this density-potential map does not exist, the Kohn-Sham system matching both n and j in a static problem is not guaranteed to exist, and Eq. (31) with ∂tA_xc = 0 cannot serve as an exact determining relation for the xc potentials in that setting. The authors should either prove or otherwise substantiate the map for the relevant class of Hamiltonians, or explicitly restrict the ground-state CDFT claims to the paramagnetic current density treated in Sec. III.C.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. IV.B, Eq. (62)] The homogeneous-limit result v^λLDA_x = 2λ vLDA_x contains a free parameter λ; the standard exchange-only LDA is recovered only for the midpoint choice λ = 1/2. The abstract and Sec. IV should state this explicitly, since otherwise the claim that the local-exchange approximation 'reduces to the exchange-only LDA' appears parameter-dependent.
[Sec. III.B, Helmholtz decomposition] The Helmholtz decomposition F_Hxc/n = -∇φ + ∇×α is not unique without specifying boundary conditions; the authors should state the boundary conditions at infinity under which the scalar potential v_Hxc and the vector potential A_xc are uniquely defined in Eqs. (32)-(35).
[Sec. III.A, Eq. (31)] The subtraction leading to Eq. (31) is algebraically involved; providing a short verification in index notation or an appendix would improve readability and help readers check the signs of the various dyadic-product terms.
[Sec. I, Introduction] The statement that the approach avoids the OEP procedure should be nuanced: solving Eq. (27) or (28) for v_Hx still requires inverting a differential equation, and the numerical cost relative to OEP is not addressed in the manuscript.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

LDA reduction is parameter-dependent: vλ=2λvLDA with λ=1/2 chosen to match LDA; central force-balance relations are otherwise self-contained.

fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV B, Eq. (62)]
"We can now just read off the local-density approximation from Eq. (60) as the first order term of the local-exchange potential and compare it to the usual LDA expression vLDAx, vλLDAx[n](r) = −2λ(3/π)^{1/3} n(r)^{1/3} = 2λ vLDAx[n](r). If one chooses λ = 1/2, which means taking the density at the middle point between r1 and r2, exactly like in the usual energy-based derivation (see Ref. 56, Eq. (6.1.13)), this yields the usual LDA exchange-only potential."

The homogeneous-limit result is a one-parameter family in which the derived exchange potential is, by definition, 2λ times the target LDA potential. The claimed reduction to standard LDA is achieved only by selecting λ = 1/2, which is the same midpoint convention used in the standard energy-based LDA derivation. The parameter λ is not determined by the force-balance equations themselves, so the reduction is a consistency condition imposed by parameter choice rather than an independent prediction. The Slater Xα connection is the same reparametrization with λ = 3α/4.

full rationale

The exact determining relations are not circular. Equations (19)-(21) follow algebraically from setting the current-density EOMs of the interacting and Kohn-Sham systems to zero and subtracting; vHxc is defined as vs-v, so Eq. (21) is a genuine equation for that difference, not an input. The CDFT and TDCDFT extensions (31)-(35) are the same subtraction with the vector-potential terms made explicit. No load-bearing self-citation occurs: Refs. 21 and 28 are cited as prior context, and the derivation is reproduced in the paper. The only circularity-like step is the homogeneous-limit benchmark: Eq. (62) defines vλLDAx = 2λ vLDAx, and standard LDA is recovered by the choice λ = 1/2, with Xα obtained by λ = 3α/4. Because λ is a free parameter of the Taylor-expansion midpoint, the abstract's unqualified claim that the approximations 'reduce to' LDA is a parameter-dependent consistency statement, not a forced result. The reviewer's curl-free objection to Eq. (23) concerns well-definedness of the approximation, not circularity, so it is not scored here. Overall, the central force-balance construction is self-contained; the circularity is partial and confined to the LDA/Xα reduction claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The exact force-balance equations rely on standard many-body quantum mechanics and the Kohn-Sham construction. The main non-trivial inputs are v-representability assumptions (explicitly flagged as open in several places), the Slater-determinant ansatz for exchange, and the slowly-varying density and uniform-electron-gas idealization in the LDA section. The homogeneous limit also introduces the free parameter λ, which sets the reference point for the density and controls the resulting potential.

free parameters (1)

λ (reference-point interpolation parameter) = 1/2 to recover LDA; 3/4 to recover Slater Xα with α=1
In Sec. IV.B the 1-RDM is evaluated at rλ = r1 + λ(r2 - r1). The resulting exchange potential is vλ = 2λ v_LDA, so the parameter is hand-chosen, not determined by the theory. Recovering LDA or Xα requires selecting a specific λ.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Well-defined density-potential mappings exist for interacting and non-interacting systems in (TD)DFT and (TD)CDFT.
Invoked in Sec. III; the paper notes unresolved v-representability and for ground-state physical-current CDFT 'tacitly assumes' the map.
domain assumption A non-interacting Kohn-Sham Slater determinant can reproduce the interacting density and, where relevant, the current densities.
Standard Kohn-Sham construction used throughout Sec. III; depends on the mapping assumptions above.
standard math The 2-RDM of a Slater determinant is given by the determinant expression in Eq. (49).
Used to evaluate the interaction force in the exchange approximation; standard property of Slater determinants.
domain assumption The homogeneous electron gas is modeled as closed-shell plane-wave orbitals up to the Fermi momentum.
Sec. IV.B; the closed-shell assumption requires an even number of electrons and no spin polarization.
domain assumption The density varies slowly enough to truncate the Taylor expansion of n(rλ)^(4/3) at first order.
Sec. IV.B, Eq. (59); this is the LDA validity condition and is not quantified in the paper.
standard math Force terms F_T and F_W are integrable and vanish at infinity so integration by parts and zero-force constraints apply.
Used in Sec. II and III to derive zero-force and zero-torque constraints; standard for localized densities.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Force Balance Approach for Advanced Approximations in Density Functional Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FL7TGW6G

@misc{pith2026190802733,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Force Balance Approach for Advanced Approximations in Density Functional Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FL7TGW6G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02733}
}

abstract

We propose a systematic and constructive way to determine the exchange-correlation potentials of density-functional theories including vector potentials. The approach does not rely on energy or action functionals. Instead it is based on equations of motion of current quantities (force balance equations) and is feasible both in the ground-state and the time-dependent setting. This avoids, besides differentiability and causality issues, the optimized-effective-potential procedure of orbital-dependent functionals. We provide straightforward exchange-type approximations for different density functional theories that for a homogeneous system and no external vector potential reduce to the exchange-only local-density and Slater X$\alpha$ approximations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

[1]

author author J. P. \ Perdew \ and\ author K. Schmidt ,\ 10.1063/1.1390175 journal journal AIP Conference Proceedings \ volume 577 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

doi:10.1063/1.1390175 2001
[2]

author author J. D. \ Talman \ and\ author W. F. \ Shadwick ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.14.36 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 14 ,\ pages 36 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.14.36 1976
[3]

Seidl , author A

author author A. Seidl , author A. G\"orling , author P. Vogl , author J. A. \ Majewski , \ and\ author M. Levy ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.3764 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 53 ,\ pages 3764 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

doi:10.1103/physrevb.53.3764 1996
[4]

K\"ummel \ and\ author L

author author S. K\"ummel \ and\ author L. Kronik ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.3 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 3 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.3 2008
[5]

author author A. P. \ Gaiduk \ and\ author V. N. \ Staroverov ,\ 10.1063/1.3176515 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 044107 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.3176515 2009
[6]

author author A. P. \ Gaiduk \ and\ author V. N. \ Staroverov ,\ 10.1063/1.3483464 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 101104 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.3483464 2010
[7]

author author P. E. \ Lammert ,\ 10.1002/qua.21342 journal journal Int. J. Quantum Chem. \ volume 107 ,\ pages 1943 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

doi:10.1002/qua.21342 1943
[8]

Kvaal , author U

author author S. Kvaal , author U. Ekstr \"o m , author A. M. \ Teale , \ and\ author T. Helgaker ,\ 10.1063/1.4867005 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 140 ,\ pages 18A518 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

doi:10.1063/1.4867005 2014

Show all 66 references

[9]

Laestadius , author M

author author A. Laestadius , author M. Penz , author E. I. \ Tellgren , author M. Ruggenthaler , author S. Kvaal , \ and\ author T. Helgaker ,\ 10.1063/1.5037790 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 149 ,\ pages 164103 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

doi
[10]

van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1142/s021797920100499x journal journal Int

author author R. van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1142/s021797920100499x journal journal Int. J. Mod. Phys. B \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1969 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

1969 doi
[11]

van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1103/physrevlett.80.1280 journal journal Phys

author author R. van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1103/physrevlett.80.1280 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 1280 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

1998 doi
[12]

Mukamel ,\ 10.1103/physreva.71.024503 journal journal Phys

author author S. Mukamel ,\ 10.1103/physreva.71.024503 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 71 ,\ pages 024503 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

2005 doi
[13]

Vignale ,\ 10.1103/physreva.77.062511 journal journal Phys

author author G. Vignale ,\ 10.1103/physreva.77.062511 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 77 ,\ pages 062511 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

2008 doi
[14]

author author J. W. \ Furness , author J. Verbeke , author E. I. \ Tellgren , author S. Stopkowicz , author U. Ekström , author T. Helgaker , \ and\ author A. M. \ Teale ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00535 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 4169 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

doi
[15]

author author E. I. \ Tellgren , author S. Kvaal , author E. Sagvolden , author U. Ekstr\"om , author A. M. \ Teale , \ and\ author T. Helgaker ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.062506 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 86 ,\ pages 062506 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

doi
[16]

Laestadius \ and\ author M

author author A. Laestadius \ and\ author M. Benedicks ,\ 10.1002/qua.24668 journal journal Int. J. Quantum Chem. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 782 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

2014 doi
[17]

Laestadius \ and\ author M

author author A. Laestadius \ and\ author M. Benedicks ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.032508 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 91 ,\ pages 032508 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015 doi
[18]

Vignale , author M

author author G. Vignale , author M. Rasolt , \ and\ author D. J. W. \ Geldart ,\ 10.1016/S0065-3276(08)60599-7 journal journal Adv. Quantum Chem. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 235 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

1990 doi
[19]

Runge \ and\ author E

author author E. Runge \ and\ author E. K. U. \ Gross ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 997 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

1984 doi
[20]

author author I. V. \ Tokatly ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.165104 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 71 ,\ pages 165104 ( year 2005 a ) NoStop

2005 doi
[21]

author author I. V. \ Tokatly ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.165105 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 71 ,\ pages 165105 ( year 2005 b ) NoStop

2005 doi
[22]

author author I. V. \ Tokatly ,\ 10.1039/b903666k journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 4621 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

2009 doi
[23]

author author I. V. \ Tokatly ,\ title Time-dependent deformation functional theory , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-642-23518-4_25 booktitle Fundamentals of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory ,\ editor edited by\ editor M. A. L. \ Marques , editor N. T. \ Maitra , editor F. M. S. ...

doi
[24]

Vignale ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.201102 journal journal Phys

author author G. Vignale ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.201102 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 70 ,\ pages 201102 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

2004 doi
[25]

Vignale , author C

author author G. Vignale , author C. A. \ Ullrich , \ and\ author S. Conti ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4878 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 4878 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

1997 doi
[26]

author author G. Vignale ,\ title Time-dependent current density functional theory , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-642-23518-4_24 booktitle Fundamentals of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory ,\ editor edited by\ editor M. A. L. \ Marques , editor N. T. \ Maitra , editor F. M. S. \...

doi
[27]

Tao \ and\ author G

author author J. Tao \ and\ author G. Vignale ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.036403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 036403 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

2006 doi
[28]

Ruggenthaler \ and\ author D

author author M. Ruggenthaler \ and\ author D. Bauer ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052502 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 80 ,\ pages 052502 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

2009 doi
[29]

author author J. I. \ Fuks , author S. E. B. \ Nielsen , author M. Ruggenthaler , \ and\ author N. T. \ Maitra ,\ 10.1039/C6CP00722H journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 20976 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016 doi
[30]

Lacombe \ and\ author N

author author L. Lacombe \ and\ author N. T. \ Maitra ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01159 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1672 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

2019 doi
[31]

Theophilou , author F

author author I. Theophilou , author F. Buchholz , author F. G. \ Eich , author M. Ruggenthaler , \ and\ author A. Rubio ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00292 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 4072 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

doi
[32]

Kohn \ and\ author L

author author W. Kohn \ and\ author L. J. \ Sham ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 140 ,\ pages A1133 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

1965 doi
[33]

Levy \ and\ author J

author author M. Levy \ and\ author J. P. \ Perdew ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.32.2010 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 32 ,\ pages 2010 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

2010 doi
[34]

Vignale ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3233 journal journal Phys

author author G. Vignale ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3233 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 3233 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

1995 doi
[35]

author author S. K. \ Ghosh \ and\ author A. K. \ Dhara ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.1149 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 38 ,\ pages 1149 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

1988 doi
[36]

author author J. C. \ Slater ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.81.385 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 385 ( year 1951 ) NoStop

1951 doi
[37]

Stefanucci \ and\ author R

author author G. Stefanucci \ and\ author R. Van Leeuwen ,\ @noop title Nonequilibrium many-body theory of quantum systems: a modern introduction \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

2013
[38]

author author K. J. H. \ Giesbertz , author O. V. \ Gritsenko , \ and\ author E. J. \ Baerends ,\ title Time-dependent reduced density matrix functional theory , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-642-23518-4_26 booktitle Fundamentals of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory ,\ editor edi...

doi
[39]

van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1016/S0065-3276(03)43002-5 journal journal Adv

author author R. van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1016/S0065-3276(03)43002-5 journal journal Adv. Quantum Chem. \ volume 43 ,\ pages 25 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

2003 doi
[40]

author author E. H. \ Lieb ,\ 10.1002/qua.560240302 journal journal Int. J. Quantum Chem. \ volume 24 ,\ pages 243 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

1983 doi
[41]

Laestadius , author M

author author A. Laestadius , author M. Penz , author E. I. \ Tellgren , author M. Ruggenthaler , author S. Kvaal , \ and\ author T. Helgaker ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00141 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 4003 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

doi
[42]

Penz , author A

author author M. Penz , author A. Laestadius , author E. I. \ Tellgren , \ and\ author M. Ruggenthaler ,\ 10.1103/physrevlett.123.037401 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 123 ,\ pages 037401 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

2019 doi
[43]

author author T. L. \ Gilbert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.2111 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 12 ,\ pages 2111 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

1975 doi
[44]

Hohenberg \ and\ author W

author author P. Hohenberg \ and\ author W. Kohn ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 136 ,\ pages B864 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

1964 doi
[45]

author author S. E. B. \ Nielsen , author M. Ruggenthaler , \ and\ author R. van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90276-4 journal journal Eur. Phys. J. B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 235 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 doi
[46]

van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3863 journal journal Phys

author author R. van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3863 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 82 ,\ pages 3863 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

1999 doi
[47]

Ruggenthaler \ and\ author R

author author M. Ruggenthaler \ and\ author R. van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1209/0295-5075/95/13001 journal journal Europhys. Lett. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 13001 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

2011 doi
[48]

Ruggenthaler , author M

author author M. Ruggenthaler , author M. Penz , \ and\ author R. Van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/27/20/203202 journal journal J. Phys. Condens. Matter \ volume 27 ,\ pages 203202 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015 doi
[49]

Vignale \ and\ author M

author author G. Vignale \ and\ author M. Rasolt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2360 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 59 ,\ pages 2360 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

1987 doi
[50]

Vignale \ and\ author M

author author G. Vignale \ and\ author M. Rasolt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.10685 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 37 ,\ pages 10685 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

1988 doi
[51]

author author E. I. \ Tellgren ,\ 10.1103/physreva.97.012504 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 97 ,\ pages 012504 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 doi
[52]

Ruggenthaler ,\ @noop \ ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.01417 arXiv:1509.01417 [quant-ph] NoStop

author author M. Ruggenthaler ,\ @noop \ ( year 2017 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.01417 arXiv:1509.01417 [quant-ph] NoStop

2017 arXiv
[53]

Sharma , author E

author author S. Sharma , author E. K. U. \ Gross , author A. Sanna , \ and\ author J. K. \ Dewhurst ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01049 journal journal J. Chem. Theory Comput. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1247 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 doi
[54]

Capelle \ and\ author G

author author K. Capelle \ and\ author G. Vignale ,\ 10.1103/physrevb.65.113106 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 65 ,\ pages 113106 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

2002 doi
[55]

Laestadius \ and\ author E

author author A. Laestadius \ and\ author E. I. \ Tellgren ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022514 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 97 ,\ pages 022514 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 doi
[56]

Parr \ and\ author W

author author R. Parr \ and\ author W. Yang ,\ @noop title Density functional theory of atoms and molecules \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 1989 ) NoStop

1989
[57]

author author J. C. \ Slater , author T. M. \ Wilson , \ and\ author J. H. \ Wood ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.179.28 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 179 ,\ pages 28 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

1969 doi
[58]

author author R. M. \ Koehl , author G. K. \ Odom , \ and\ author G. E. \ Scuseria ,\ 10.1080/00268979600100561 journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 835 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

1996 doi
[59]

Vignale \ and\ author W

author author G. Vignale \ and\ author W. Kohn ,\ 10.1103/physrevlett.77.2037 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 2037 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

1996 doi
[60]

Pribram-Jones , author D

author author A. Pribram-Jones , author D. A. \ Gross , \ and\ author K. Burke ,\ 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040214-121420 journal journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 66 ,\ pages 283 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015 doi
[61]

author author K. J. H. \ Giesbertz , author R. van Leeuwen , \ and\ author U. von Barth ,\ 10.1103/physreva.87.022514 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 87 ,\ pages 022514 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

2013 doi
[62]

author author I. V. \ Tokatly ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.035127 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 83 ,\ pages 035127 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

2011 doi
[63]

Sen \ and\ author E

author author S. Sen \ and\ author E. I. \ Tellgren ,\ 10.1063/1.5041931 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 149 ,\ pages 144109 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 doi
[64]

Ruggenthaler , author F

author author M. Ruggenthaler , author F. Mackenroth , \ and\ author D. Bauer ,\ 10.1103/physreva.84.042107 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 84 ,\ pages 042107 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

2011 doi
[65]

author author I. V. \ Tokatly ,\ 10.1103/physrevlett.110.233001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 233001 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

2013 doi
[66]

Ruggenthaler , author J

author author M. Ruggenthaler , author J. Flick , author C. Pellegrini , author H. Appel , author I. V. \ Tokatly , \ and\ author A. Rubio ,\ 10.1103/physreva.90.012508 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 90 ,\ pages 012508 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

author author J. P. \ Perdew \ and\ author K. Schmidt ,\ 10.1063/1.1390175 journal journal AIP Conference Proceedings \ volume 577 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

doi:10.1063/1.1390175 2001

[2] [2]

author author J. D. \ Talman \ and\ author W. F. \ Shadwick ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.14.36 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 14 ,\ pages 36 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.14.36 1976

[3] [3]

Seidl , author A

author author A. Seidl , author A. G\"orling , author P. Vogl , author J. A. \ Majewski , \ and\ author M. Levy ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.3764 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 53 ,\ pages 3764 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

doi:10.1103/physrevb.53.3764 1996

[4] [4]

K\"ummel \ and\ author L

author author S. K\"ummel \ and\ author L. Kronik ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.3 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 3 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.3 2008

[5] [5]

author author A. P. \ Gaiduk \ and\ author V. N. \ Staroverov ,\ 10.1063/1.3176515 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 044107 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.3176515 2009

[6] [6]

author author A. P. \ Gaiduk \ and\ author V. N. \ Staroverov ,\ 10.1063/1.3483464 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 101104 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/1.3483464 2010

[7] [7]

author author P. E. \ Lammert ,\ 10.1002/qua.21342 journal journal Int. J. Quantum Chem. \ volume 107 ,\ pages 1943 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

doi:10.1002/qua.21342 1943

[8] [8]

Kvaal , author U

author author S. Kvaal , author U. Ekstr \"o m , author A. M. \ Teale , \ and\ author T. Helgaker ,\ 10.1063/1.4867005 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 140 ,\ pages 18A518 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

doi:10.1063/1.4867005 2014