Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 171 references

Understanding Optical Music Recognition

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper defines Optical Music Recognition as a research field that computationally reads music notation in documents, and organizes its applications into four levels of comprehension.

desk verdict A very good state-of-the-field paper whose four-part application taxonomy is genuinely useful, even though it is not entailed by the paper's own definition. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03608 v3 pith:ZJQKFCHJ submitted 2019-08-07 cs.CV cs.AIcs.IRcs.SDeess.AS

Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza , Jan Hajič Jr. , Alexander Pacha This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.IRcs.SDeess.AS
keywords opticalmusicrecognitionnotationdocumentanalysistaxonomyofapplicationsinformationretrievaldeeplearningevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

After five decades of scattered contributions, Optical Music Recognition (OMR) still lacked a shared definition and a way to compare results. This tutorial supplies both: it defines OMR as a research field that investigates how to computationally read music notation in documents, and it derives a taxonomy of applications from the process of inverting music encoding. The four application classes—document metadata extraction, search, replayability, and structured encoding—demand increasing levels of comprehension and each comes with its own natural evaluation strategy. If the taxonomy is adopted, the vague question 'Does OMR work?' becomes answerable only in the form 'Does OMR work for application X?', which is exactly what the authors argue the field needs. The payoff is that otherwise incomparable systems can finally be measured against one another within each class.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the inverse-encoding model: music is conceptualized as notes in time, engraved with a notation system, and embodied in a document, and OMR runs this process backwards. The inversion splits into two prongs—recovering the notation itself and recovering the musical semantics—and the paper's four application categories are generated by how far back along this chain a system must go and how much comprehension is required. The level-of-comprehension ladder, from partial understanding for metadata extraction to complete understanding for structured encoding, is the organizing device that ties output representations to evaluation strategies.

What would settle it

Survey OMR papers from the past five years in the field's main venues and try to assign each paper's stated goal to exactly one of the four application categories; if a substantial share cannot be assigned uniquely, or if papers inside a single category report no common evaluation metric, then the taxonomy's promised shared evaluation protocols fail in practice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that OMR is not a single task or process but a research field, defined as investigating how to computationally read music notation in documents. Reading itself has two distinct targets: recovering the music notation as laid out on the page, and recovering the musical semantics—pitches, velocities, onsets, and durations—encoded by that notation. Because these targets require different outputs and tolerate different errors, the paper argues OMR has at least four natural application classes: metadata extraction, search, replayability, and structured encoding, arranged by increasing comprehension. The taxonomy's practical point is that evaluation can be shared within each class: classification metrics for metadata, information-retrieval metrics for search, sequence comparison for replayability, and, once a formal model of notation exists, an intrinsic metric for structured encoding.

Load-bearing premise

The taxonomy rests on the assumption that reading a music document splits cleanly into recovering the notation and recovering the semantics, and that every real OMR application falls into exactly one of the four categories with a shared evaluation protocol.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The question 'Does OMR work?' becomes well-posed only when followed by a target application: metadata extraction, search, replayability, or structured encoding.
  • Search applications can adopt standard information-retrieval metrics such as precision, recall, and mean average precision, since they output ranked matches to a musical query.
  • Replayability systems can be evaluated by comparing pitch-onset-duration sequences, reusing symbolic melodic-similarity metrics from music information retrieval.
  • Metadata extraction reduces to classification or regression and can be scored with accuracy or mean squared error.
  • Structured encoding remains the hard case: without a formal model of music notation and an intrinsic edit distance between scores, no meaningful evaluation metric exists.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The taxonomy implies that a single OMR system cannot be judged by one number; a system can be excellent for replayability yet useless for structured encoding, so the field should report results per application class.
  • If search is defined by semantic queries rather than full transcription, then OMR systems for search can be trained to ignore notation details that do not affect retrieval, which may make them more error-tolerant than transcription-first pipelines.
  • A natural next step would be a benchmark suite with one shared dataset and metric per application class; its absence would itself be evidence of the fragmentation the paper describes.
  • Adopting the notation-versus-semantics distinction would let digital-musicology studies that only need musical semantics proceed without waiting for full structured encoding, since MIDI-level output suffices for many corpus-wide questions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a tutorial and survey of Optical Music Recognition (OMR). It proposes a formal definition: OMR is a field of research that investigates how to computationally read music notation in documents (Definition 1). The paper then analyzes OMR as the process of inverting music encoding, distinguishing between recovering the music notation itself (stage A) and recovering musical semantics (stage B). On this basis, it proposes a taxonomy of OMR inputs, system architectures, and, most centrally, four application categories with increasing levels of comprehension: document metadata extraction, search, replayability, and structured encoding. The paper also reviews traditional pipeline-based approaches and deep learning alternatives, and it concludes with a list of open issues. The contributions are definitional and organizational rather than experimental, with a substantial curated bibliography provided as supplementary material.

Significance. If the definition and taxonomy are adopted by the community, this paper would materially improve the clarity, comparability, and accessibility of OMR research. The definition is carefully argued to capture the field's breadth while excluding non-OMR tasks, and the taxonomy provides a practical vocabulary for researchers and stakeholders. The paper's strength lies in its systematic organization, its concrete examples, and the extensible curated bibliography. The taxonomy is proposed pragmatically rather than proven from first principles, which is appropriate for a tutorial; this does not undermine the core definitional contribution but does leave room for clarification in the presentation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section VI-B / Fig. 13] The four application categories are not derived from Definition 1 or from the A/B distinction presented in Section IV. The paper itself states that it "needed to broaden the scope" beyond the two prongs of Replayability and Structured Encoding to also include Search and Document Metadata Extraction. Moreover, the "level of comprehension" ordering in Fig. 13 is asserted rather than operationalized. Because the taxonomy is one of the paper's three headline contributions, the authors should make explicit that this is a practical systematization rather than a logical consequence of the definition, and they should discuss boundary cases such as query-by-example search, which may not require comprehension strictly between metadata extraction and replayability. A short paragraph acknowledging the heuristic nature of the ordering and pointing to possible alternative groupings would address this concern.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Section I] The abstract refers to the paper as a "tutorial," while the opening of the full text says "In this work"; the wording should be aligned.
  2. [Fig. 13] The labels in Fig. 13 are difficult to parse in the current rendering; please ensure the figure is typeset clearly so that the four category names and the "Level of Comprehension" axis are legible.
  3. [Section VI-B2] Definition 3 says a musical query "must convey musical semantics," but the same section mentions image queries (query-by-example); please clarify whether image queries are interpreted semantically or are treated as raw visual patterns.
  4. [Section VI-B4] The paper frequently cites the authors' own prior work as illustrations; this is acceptable, but adding an explicit sentence that these works are used as examples of existing research rather than as evidence for the taxonomy would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the definitions and taxonomy are argued proposals, not derivations that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain: Definition 1 is explicitly stipulative ('we would rather prefer to put an umbrella over OMR and name its essence by proposing the following definition'), and the later claims are structural analyses of that definition plus proposed classifications. Section IV derives two readings of 'read' (recover notation vs. recover semantics) from the writing/reading process, and Section VI-B maps Replayability and Structured Encoding onto those prongs; crucially, the paper itself states that it 'need[s] to broaden the scope of OMR' before adding Document Metadata Extraction and Search, which is an admission that the four-category taxonomy is not entailed by the two-prong analysis alone. The ordering by 'level of comprehension' is an argued proposal rather than a fitted or constructed consequence of Definition 1, so any weakness in that ordering is a support or evidence gap, not circularity. The paper's self-citations ([30], [81], [83], [119]) serve as pointers to prior workshops, baseline benchmarks, and one author's evaluation argument; none functions as an unverified uniqueness theorem or smuggled ansatz, and the intrinsic-evaluation recommendation is accompanied by fresh reasoning in the same section. No parameter is fitted and then relabeled as a prediction, and no equation or output representation is equivalent by construction to an input. Verdict: no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or physical entities. It relies on domain assumptions about how music is conceptualized and how reading can be decomposed, plus its own proposed taxonomy.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Music is conceptualized as a structure of notes in time, defined by pitch, duration, loudness, timbre, and onset.
    Section III introduces this as the basis for OMR; it excludes other conceptualizations like spectralism or plainchant, which are noted but set aside.
  • domain assumption OMR ends where performers start to disagree over the same piece of music; music notation under-specifies interpretation.
    Section III states this as a natural boundary for OMR, excluding interpretive steps (performer's step 3) from the field.
  • domain assumption Reading music notation can be decomposed into recovering notation (A) versus recovering musical semantics (B).
    Section IV defines these two prongs as fundamental, and Section VI-B builds the application taxonomy directly on them.
  • ad hoc to paper The four proposed application categories (metadata extraction, search, replayability, structured encoding) are natural groups with increasing comprehension and shared evaluation protocols.
    Section VI-B proposes this taxonomy as the paper's central novel contribution; it is not derived from prior work.
  • domain assumption Recent deep learning advances have moved some OMR subtasks from 'hard' to 'clearly solvable', making broader applications practical.
    Section VII motivates the taxonomy's relevance; the paper cites [70], [118] for this claim without reproducing them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Understanding Optical Music Recognition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZJQKFCHJ

@misc{pith2026190803608,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Understanding Optical Music Recognition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZJQKFCHJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03608}
}
read the original abstract

For over 50 years, researchers have been trying to teach computers to read music notation, referred to as Optical Music Recognition (OMR). However, this field is still difficult to access for new researchers, especially those without a significant musical background: few introductory materials are available, and furthermore the field has struggled with defining itself and building a shared terminology. In this tutorial, we address these shortcomings by (1) providing a robust definition of OMR and its relationship to related fields, (2) analyzing how OMR inverts the music encoding process to recover the musical notation and the musical semantics from documents, (3) proposing a taxonomy of OMR, with most notably a novel taxonomy of applications. Additionally, we discuss how deep learning affects modern OMR research, as opposed to the traditional pipeline. Based on this work, the reader should be able to attain a basic understanding of OMR: its objectives, its inherent structure, its relationship to other fields, the state of the art, and the research opportunities it affords.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03608 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. How OMR tends to be defined or described and how our proposed definition relates to it. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Excerpt of Robert Schumann’s “Kinderszenen”, Op. 15 for piano. Properly engraved (a), it has [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. How music is typically expressed and embodied (written down). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: How “reading” music can be interpreted as the operations of inverting the encoding process. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Optical Music Recognition with its most important related fields, methods, and applications. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: How the translation of the graphical concept of a note into a pitch is affected by the clef and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: This excerpt by Ludwig van Beethoven, Piano Sonata op. 2 no. 2, Largo appassionato, m. 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Brahms Intermezzo, Op. 117 no. 1. Adjacent notes of the chords in the first bar in the top staff [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Sample from the CVC-MUSCIMA dataset [60] with the same bar transcribed by two different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Sample from the Songbook of Romeo & Julia by Gerard Presgurvic [125] with uneven spacing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Examples of scores written in various notations: (a) Common Western Music Notation (Dvorak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Examples of the four categories of structural complexity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Taxonomy of four categories of OMR applications that require an increasing level of comprehen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Beginning of Franz Schubert, Impromptu D.899 No. 2. The triplet marks starting in the second [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: An overview of the taxonomy of OMR inputs, architectures, and outputs. A fairly simple OMR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

171 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Music search engine from noisy OMR data

    Sanu Pulimootil Achankunju. Music search engine from noisy OMR data. In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music Systems , pages 23–24, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  2. [2]

    Mobile system for optical music recognition and music sound generation

    Julia Adamska, Mateusz Piecuch, Mateusz Podgórski, Piotr Walkiewicz, and Ewa Lukasik. Mobile system for optical music recognition and music sound generation. In Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management , pages 571–582, Cham, 2015. Springer International Publishing

    2015

  3. [3]

    An integrated grammar-based approach for mathematical expression recognition

    Francisco Álvaro, Joan-Andreu Sánchez, and José-Miguel Benedí. An integrated grammar-based approach for mathematical expression recognition. Pattern Recognition, 51:135–147, 2016

    2016

  4. [4]

    On automatic pattern recognition and acquisition of printed music

    Alfio Andronico and Alberto Ciampa. On automatic pattern recognition and acquisition of printed music. In International Computer Music Conference, Venice, Italy, 1982. Michigan Publishing. 26

    1982

  5. [5]

    Gocen: A handwritten notational interface for musical performance and learning music

    Tetsuaki Baba, Yuya Kikukawa, Toshiki Yoshiike, Tatsuhiko Suzuki, Rika Shoji, Kumiko Kushiyama, and Makoto Aoki. Gocen: A handwritten notational interface for musical performance and learning music. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Emerging Technologies , pages 9–9, New York, USA, 2012. ACM

    2012

  6. [6]

    Dealing with superimposed objects in optical music recognition

    David Bainbridge and Tim Bell. Dealing with superimposed objects in optical music recognition. In 6th International Conference on Image Processing and its Applications , number 443, pages 756–760, 1997

    1997

  7. [7]

    The challenge of optical music recognition

    David Bainbridge and Tim Bell. The challenge of optical music recognition. Computers and the Humanities , 35(2):95–121, 2001

    2001

  8. [8]

    A music notation construction engine for optical music recognition

    David Bainbridge and Tim Bell. A music notation construction engine for optical music recognition. Software: Practice and Experience, 33(2):173–200, 2003

    2003

Show all 171 references
  1. [9]

    Identifying music documents in a collection of images

    David Bainbridge and Tim Bell. Identifying music documents in a collection of images. In 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pages 47–52, Victoria, Canada, 2006

    2006

  2. [10]

    Matching musical themes based on noisy OCR and OMR input

    Stefan Balke, Sanu Pulimootil Achankunju, and Meinard Müller. Matching musical themes based on noisy OCR and OMR input. In International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 703–707. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Optical music recognition by recurrent neural networks

    Arnau Baró, Pau Riba, Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, and Alicia Fornés. Optical music recognition by recurrent neural networks. In 14th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 25–26, Kyoto, Japan, 2017. IEEE

    2017

  4. [12]

    Towards the recognition of compound music notes in handwritten music scores

    Arnau Baró, Pau Riba, and Alicia Fornés. Towards the recognition of compound music notes in handwritten music scores. In 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition , pages 465–470. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    A starting point for handwritten music recognition

    Arnau Baró, Pau Riba, and Alicia Fornés. A starting point for handwritten music recognition. In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music Systems , pages 5–6, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    Louis W. G. Barton. The NEUMES project: digital transcription of medieval chant manuscripts. In 2nd International Conference on Web Delivering of Music , pages 211–218, 2002

    2002

  7. [15]

    A simplified attributed graph grammar for high-level music recognition

    Stephan Baumann. A simplified attributed graph grammar for high-level music recognition. In 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 1080–1083. IEEE, 1995

    1995

  8. [16]

    Transforming printed piano music into MIDI

    Stephan Baumann and Andreas Dengel. Transforming printed piano music into MIDI. In Advances in Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition, pages 363–372. World Scientific, 1992

    1992

  9. [17]

    Ehmann, and J

    Mert Bay, Andreas F. Ehmann, and J. Stephen Downie. Evaluation of multiple-f0 estimation and tracking systems. In 10th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , pages 315–320, Kobe, Japan, 2009

    2009

  10. [18]

    Optical music sheet segmentation

    Pierfrancesco Bellini, Ivan Bruno, and Paolo Nesi. Optical music sheet segmentation. In 1st International Conference on WEB Delivering of Music , pages 183–190. Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2001

    2001

  11. [19]

    Assessing optical music recognition tools

    Pierfrancesco Bellini, Ivan Bruno, and Paolo Nesi. Assessing optical music recognition tools. Computer Music Journal, 31(1):68–93, 2007

    2007

  12. [20]

    Digital image archive of medieval music

    Margaret Bent and Andrew Wathey. Digital image archive of medieval music. https://www.diamm.ac.uk, 1998

    1998

  13. [21]

    Audiveris

    Hervé Bitteur. Audiveris. https://github.com/audiveris, 2004

    2004

  14. [22]

    Dorothea Blostein and Henry S. Baird. A critical survey of music image analysis. In Structured Document Image Analysis , pages 405–434. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992

    1992

  15. [23]

    Recognition of music notation: Sspr’90 working group report

    Dorothea Blostein and Nicholas Paul Carter. Recognition of music notation: Sspr’90 working group report. In Structured Document Image Analysis, pages 573–574. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992

    1992

  16. [24]

    Justification of printed music

    Dorothea Blostein and Lippold Haken. Justification of printed music. Communications of the ACM , 34(3):88–99, 1991

    1991

  17. [25]

    Enhanced bleedthrough correction for early music documents with recto-verso registration

    John Ashley Burgoyne, Johanna Devaney, Laurent Pugin, and Ichiro Fujinaga. Enhanced bleedthrough correction for early music documents with recto-verso registration. In 9th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pages 407–412, Philadelphia, PA, 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    Stephen Downie

    John Ashley Burgoyne, Ichiro Fujinaga, and J. Stephen Downie. Music information retrieval. In A New Companion to Digital Humanities, pages 213–228. Wiley Blackwell, 2015

    2015

  19. [27]

    A music representation requirement specification for academia

    Donald Byrd and Eric Isaacson. A music representation requirement specification for academia. Technical report, Indiana University, Bloomington, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Prospects for improving OMR with multiple recognizers

    Donald Byrd and Megan Schindele. Prospects for improving OMR with multiple recognizers. In 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval , pages 41–46, 2006

    2006

  21. [29]

    Towards a standard testbed for optical music recognition: Definitions, metrics, and page images

    Donald Byrd and Jakob Grue Simonsen. Towards a standard testbed for optical music recognition: Definitions, metrics, and page images. Journal of New Music Research , 44(3):169–195, 2015

    2015

  22. [30]

    Discussion group summary: Optical music recognition

    Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, Jan Haji ˇc jr., and Alexander Pacha. Discussion group summary: Optical music recognition. In Graphics Recognition, Current Trends and Evolutions , Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 152–157. Springer International Publishing, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    Recognition of pen-based music notation: The HOMUS dataset

    Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza and Jose Oncina. Recognition of pen-based music notation: The HOMUS dataset. In 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition , pages 3038–3043. Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2014

    2014

  24. [32]

    Camera-primus: Neural end-to-end optical music recognition on realistic monophonic scores

    Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza and David Rizo. Camera-primus: Neural end-to-end optical music recognition on realistic monophonic scores. In 19th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , pages 248–255, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    End-to-end neural optical music recognition of monophonic scores

    Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza and David Rizo. End-to-end neural optical music recognition of monophonic scores. Applied Sciences , 8(4), 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    Handwritten music recognition for mensural notation: Formulation, data and baseline results

    Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, Alejandro Toselli, and Enrique Vidal. Handwritten music recognition for mensural notation: Formulation, data and baseline results. In 14th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 1081–1086, Kyoto, Japan, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Toselli, and Enrique Vidal

    Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, Alejandro H. Toselli, and Enrique Vidal. Probabilistic music-symbol spotting in handwritten scores. In 16th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition , pages 558–563, Niagara Falls, USA, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Cancino-Chacón, Maarten Grachten, Werner Goebl, and Gerhard Widmer

    Carlos E. Cancino-Chacón, Maarten Grachten, Werner Goebl, and Gerhard Widmer. Computational models of expressive music performance: A comprehensive and critical review. Frontiers in Digital Humanities , 5:25, 2018. 27

    2018

  29. [37]

    Capella scan

    capella-software AG. Capella scan. https://www.capella-software.com, 1996

    1996

  30. [38]

    A new edition of walton’s façade using automatic score recognition

    Nicholas Paul Carter. A new edition of walton’s façade using automatic score recognition. In Advances in Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition, pages 352–362. World Scientific, 1992

    1992

  31. [39]

    An optical music recognition system for traditional chinese kunqu opera scores written in gong-che notation

    Gen-Fang Chen and Jia-Shing Sheu. An optical music recognition system for traditional chinese kunqu opera scores written in gong-che notation. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing , 2014(1):7, 2014

    2014

  32. [40]

    Midi-assisted egocentric optical music recognition

    Liang Chen and Kun Duan. Midi-assisted egocentric optical music recognition. In Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Renotation from optical music recognition

    Liang Chen, Rong Jin, and Christopher Raphael. Renotation from optical music recognition. In Mathematics and Computation in Music, pages 16–26, Cham, 2015. Springer International Publishing

    2015

  34. [42]

    Human-guided recognition of music score images

    Liang Chen, Rong Jin, and Christopher Raphael. Human-guided recognition of music score images. In 4th International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology . ACM Press, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Optical music recognition and human-in-the-loop computation

    Liang Chen and Christopher Raphael. Optical music recognition and human-in-the-loop computation. In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music Systems , pages 11–12, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  36. [44]

    Atul K. Chhabra. Graphic symbol recognition: An overview. In Graphics Recognition Algorithms and Systems , pages 68–79, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    1998

  37. [45]

    Sainath, Yonghui Wu, Rohit Prabhavalkar, Patrick Nguyen, Zhifeng Chen, Anjuli Kannan, Ron J

    Chung-Cheng Chiu, Tara N. Sainath, Yonghui Wu, Rohit Prabhavalkar, Patrick Nguyen, Zhifeng Chen, Anjuli Kannan, Ron J. Weiss, Kanishka Rao, Ekaterina Gonina, Navdeep Jaitly, Bo Li, Jan Chorowski, and Michiel Bacchiani. State-of-the-art speech recognition with sequence-to-seque...

    2018

  38. [46]

    Bootstrapping samples of accidentals in dense piano scores for CNN-based detection

    Kwon-Young Choi, Bertrand Coüasnon, Yann Ricquebourg, and Richard Zanibbi. Bootstrapping samples of accidentals in dense piano scores for CNN-based detection. In 14th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , Kyoto, Japan, 2017. IAPR TC10 (Technical Commi...

    2017

  39. [47]

    Sayeed Choudhury, M

    G. Sayeed Choudhury, M. Droetboom, Tim DiLauro, Ichiro Fujinaga, and Brian Harrington. Optical music recognition system within a large-scale digitization project. In 1st International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval , 2000

    2000

  40. [48]

    An efficient end-to-end neural model for handwritten text recognition

    Arindam Chowdhury and Lovekesh Vig. An efficient end-to-end neural model for handwritten text recognition. In 29th British Machine Vision Conference, 2018

    2018

  41. [49]

    Using grammars to segment and recognize music scores

    Bertrand Coüasnon and Jean Camillerapp. Using grammars to segment and recognize music scores. In International Association for Pattern Recognition Workshop on Document Analysis Systems , pages 15–27, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1994

    1994

  42. [50]

    Searching page-images of early music scanned with omr: A scalable solution using minimal absent words

    Tim Crawford, Golnaz Badkobeh, and David Lewis. Searching page-images of early music scanned with omr: A scalable solution using minimal absent words. In 19th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , pages 233–239, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  43. [51]

    Michalakis, and Christine Pranzas

    Christoph Dalitz, Georgios K. Michalakis, and Christine Pranzas. Optical recognition of psaltic byzantine chant notation. International Journal of Document Analysis and Recognition , 11(3):143–158, 2008

    2008

  44. [52]

    Innovative mir applications at the bayerische staatsbibliothek

    Jürgen Diet. Innovative mir applications at the bayerische staatsbibliothek. In 5th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  45. [53]

    Optical music recognition of the singer using formant frequency estimation of vocal fold vibration and lip motion with interpolated gmm classifiers

    Ing-Jr Ding, Chih-Ta Yen, Che-Wei Chang, and He-Zhong Lin. Optical music recognition of the singer using formant frequency estimation of vocal fold vibration and lip motion with interpolated gmm classifiers. Journal of Vibroengineering, 16(5):2572–2581, 2014

    2014

  46. [54]

    Learning audio–sheet music correspondences for cross-modal retrieval and piece identification

    Matthias Dorfer, Jan Haji ˇc jr., Andreas Arzt, Harald Frostel, and Gerhard Widmer. Learning audio–sheet music correspondences for cross-modal retrieval and piece identification. Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval , 1(1):22–33, 2018

    2018

  47. [55]

    Matthew J. Dovey. Overview of the OMRAS project: Online music retrieval and searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 55(12):1100–1107, 2004

    2004

  48. [56]

    Fahmy and Dorothea Blostein

    Hoda M. Fahmy and Dorothea Blostein. A graph grammar programming style for recognition of music notation. Machine Vision and Applications, 6(2):83–99, 1993

    1993

  49. [57]

    Berklee Contemporary Music Notation

    Jonathan Feist. Berklee Contemporary Music Notation . Berklee Press, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Graphics Recognition, Current Trends and Evolutions , volume 11009 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science

    Alicia Fornés and Lamiroy Bart, editors. Graphics Recognition, Current Trends and Evolutions , volume 11009 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, 2018

    2018

  51. [59]

    The ICDAR 2011 music scores competition: Staff removal and writer identification

    Alicia Fornés, Anjan Dutta, Albert Gordo, and Josep Llados. The ICDAR 2011 music scores competition: Staff removal and writer identification. In International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 1511–1515, 2011

    2011

  52. [60]

    CVC-MUSCIMA: A ground-truth of handwritten music score images for writer identification and staff removal

    Alicia Fornés, Anjan Dutta, Albert Gordo, and Josep Lladós. CVC-MUSCIMA: A ground-truth of handwritten music score images for writer identification and staff removal. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition , 15(3):243–251, 2012

    2012

  53. [61]

    Primitive segmentation in old handwritten music scores

    Alicia Fornés, Josep Lladós, and Gemma Sánchez. Primitive segmentation in old handwritten music scores. In Graphics Recognition. Ten Years Review and Future Perspectives , pages 279–290, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    2006

  54. [62]

    Old handwritten musical symbol classification by a dynamic time warping based method

    Alicia Fornés, Josep Lladós, and Gemma Sánchez. Old handwritten musical symbol classification by a dynamic time warping based method. In Graphics Recognition. Recent Advances and New Opportunities , pages 51–60, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    2008

  55. [63]

    Writer identification in old handwritten music scores

    Alicia Fornés, Josep Lladós, Gemma Sánchez, and Horst Bunke. Writer identification in old handwritten music scores. In 8th International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems , pages 347–353, Nara, Japan, 2008

    2008

  56. [64]

    On the use of textural features for writer identification in old handwritten music scores

    Alicia Fornés, Josep Lladós, Gemma Sánchez, and Horst Bunke. On the use of textural features for writer identification in old handwritten music scores. 10th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 996–1000, 2009

    2009

  57. [65]

    An optical notation recognition system for printed music based on template matching and high level reasoning

    Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, George Giakoupis, Aggelos Livens, Stylianos Bakamidis, and George Carayannis. An optical notation recognition system for printed music based on template matching and high level reasoning. In RIAO ’00 Content-Based Multimedia Information Access, pages 1...

    2000

  58. [66]

    Automatic mapping of scanned sheet music to audio recordings

    Christian Fremerey, Meinard Müller, Frank Kurth, and Michael Clausen. Automatic mapping of scanned sheet music to audio recordings. In 9th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval , pages 413–418, 2008

    2008

  59. [67]

    Optical music recognition using projections

    Ichiro Fujinaga. Optical music recognition using projections. Master’s thesis, McGill University, 1988

    1988

  60. [68]

    Simssa: Single interface for music score searching and analysis

    Ichiro Fujinaga and Andrew Hankinson. Simssa: Single interface for music score searching and analysis. Journal of the Japanese Society for Sonic Arts , 6(3):25–30, 2014

    2014

  61. [69]

    Ichiro Fujinaga, Andrew Hankinson, and Julie E. Cumming. Introduction to SIMSSA (single interface for music score searching and analysis). In 1st International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology , pages 1–3. ACM, 2014

    2014

  62. [70]

    Staff-line removal with selectional auto-encoders

    Antonio-Javier Gallego and Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza. Staff-line removal with selectional auto-encoders. Expert Systems with Applications, 89:138–148, 2017

    2017

  63. [71]

    iseenotes

    Gear Up AB. iseenotes. http://www.iseenotes.com, 2017

    2017

  64. [72]

    Susan E. George. Online pen-based recognition of music notation with artificial neural networks. Computer Music Journal, 27(2):70– 79, 2003

    2003

  65. [73]

    Susan E. George. Wavelets for dealing with super-imposed objects in recognition of music notation. In Visual Perception of Music Notation: On-Line and Off Line Recognition , pages 78–107. IRM Press, Hershey, PA, 2004

    2004

  66. [74]

    Giotis, Giorgos Sfikas, Basilis Gatos, and Christophoros Nikou

    Angelos P. Giotis, Giorgos Sfikas, Basilis Gatos, and Christophoros Nikou. A survey of document image word spotting techniques. Pattern Recognition, 68:310–332, 2017

    2017

  67. [75]

    MusicXML: An internet-friendly format for sheet music

    Michael Good. MusicXML: An internet-friendly format for sheet music. Technical report, Recordare LLC, 2001

    2001

  68. [76]

    Using MusicXML for file interchange

    Michael Good and Geri Actor. Using MusicXML for file interchange. In Third International Conference on WEB Delivering of Music, page 153, 2003

    2003

  69. [77]

    Writer identification in handwritten musical scores with bags of notes

    Albert Gordo, Alicia Fornés, and Ernest Valveny. Writer identification in handwritten musical scores with bags of notes. Pattern Recognition, 46(5):1337–1345, 2013

    2013

  70. [78]

    Scores of scores: An openscore project to encode and share sheet music

    Mark Gotham, Peter Jonas, Bruno Bower, William Bosworth, Daniel Rootham, and Leigh VanHandel. Scores of scores: An openscore project to encode and share sheet music. In 5th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology , pages 87–95, Paris, France, 2018. ACM

    2018

  71. [79]

    Behind Bars

    Elaine Gould. Behind Bars. Faber Music, 2011

    2011

  72. [80]

    OMRJX: A framework for piano scores optical music recognition

    Gianmarco Gozzi. OMRJX: A framework for piano scores optical music recognition. Master’s thesis, Politecnico di Milano, 2010

    2010

  73. [81]

    A case for intrinsic evaluation of optical music recognition

    Jan Haji ˇc jr. A case for intrinsic evaluation of optical music recognition. In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music Systems , pages 15–16, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  74. [82]

    Towards full-pipeline handwritten OMR with musical symbol detection by u-nets

    Jan Haji ˇc jr., Matthias Dorfer, Gerhard Widmer, and Pavel Pecina. Towards full-pipeline handwritten OMR with musical symbol detection by u-nets. In 19th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , pages 225–232, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  75. [83]

    How current optical music recognition systems are becoming useful for digital libraries

    Jan Haji ˇc jr., Marta Kolárová, Alexander Pacha, and Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza. How current optical music recognition systems are becoming useful for digital libraries. In 5th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology , pages 57–61, Paris, France,

  76. [84]

    Further steps towards a standard testbed for optical music recognition

    Jan Haji ˇc jr., Jiˇrí Novotný, Pavel Pecina, and Jaroslav Pokorný. Further steps towards a standard testbed for optical music recognition. In 17th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, pages 157–163, New York, USA, 2016. New York University, New Yo...

    2016

  77. [85]

    and Pavel Pecina

    Jan Haji ˇc jr. and Pavel Pecina. Groundtruthing (not only) music notation with MUSICMarker: A practical overview. In 14th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 47–48, Kyoto, Japan, 2017

    2017

  78. [86]

    and Pavel Pecina

    Jan Haji ˇc jr. and Pavel Pecina. The MUSCIMA++ dataset for handwritten optical music recognition. In 14th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 39–46, Kyoto, Japan, 2017

    2017

  79. [87]

    Information Retrieval Evaluation

    Donna Harman. Information Retrieval Evaluation . Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 1st edition, 2011

    2011

  80. [88]

    Optical music recognition and manuscript chant sources

    Kate Helsen, Jennifer Bain, Ichiro Fujinaga, Andrew Hankinson, and Debra Lacoste. Optical music recognition and manuscript chant sources. Early Music, 42(4):555–558, 2014

    2014

  81. [89]

    The Norton Manual of Music Notation

    George Heussenstamm. The Norton Manual of Music Notation . W. W. Norton & Company, 1987

    1987

  82. [90]

    Automatic recognition of printed music and its conversion into playable music data

    Władysław Homenda. Automatic recognition of printed music and its conversion into playable music data. Control and Cybernetics, 25(2):353–367, 1996

    1996

  83. [91]

    Automatic handwritten mensural notation interpreter: From manuscript to MIDI performance

    Yu-Hui Huang, Xuanli Chen, Serafina Beck, David Burn, and Luc Van Gool. Automatic handwritten mensural notation interpreter: From manuscript to MIDI performance. In 16th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , pages 79–85, Málaga, Spain, 2015

    2015

  84. [92]

    Ponce de León, David Rizo, José Oncina, Luisa Micó, Juan Ramón Rico-Juan, Carlos Pérez-Sancho, and Antonio Pertusa

    José Manuel Iñesta, Pedro J. Ponce de León, David Rizo, José Oncina, Luisa Micó, Juan Ramón Rico-Juan, Carlos Pérez-Sancho, and Antonio Pertusa. Hispamus: Handwritten spanish music heritage preservation by automatic transcription. In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music...

    2018

  85. [93]

    Optical music recognition

    Linn Saxrud Johansen. Optical music recognition. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo, 2009

    2009

  86. [94]

    Optical music imaging: Music document digitisation, recognition, evaluation, and restoration

    Graham Jones, Bee Ong, Ivan Bruno, and Kia Ng. Optical music imaging: Music document digitisation, recognition, evaluation, and restoration. In Interactive multimedia music technologies , pages 50–79. IGI Global, 2008

    2008

  87. [95]

    DocCreator: A new software for creating synthetic ground-truthed document images

    Nicholas Journet, Muriel Visani, Boris Mansencal, Kieu Van-Cuong, and Antoine Billy. DocCreator: A new software for creating synthetic ground-truthed document images. Journal of Imaging , 3(4):62, 2017

    2017

  88. [96]

    Optical character-recognition of printed music : A review of two dissertations

    Michael Kassler. Optical character-recognition of printed music : A review of two dissertations. automatic recognition of sheet music by dennis howard pruslin ; computer pattern recognition of standard engraved music notation by david stewart prerau. Perspectives of New Music ...

    1972

  89. [97]

    Klaus Keil and Jennifer A. Ward. Applications of RISM data in digital libraries and digital musicology. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2017

    2017

  90. [98]

    Issues in ground-truthing graphic documents

    Daniel Lopresti and George Nagy. Issues in ground-truthing graphic documents. In Graphics Recognition Algorithms and Applications, pages 46–67. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Ontario, Canada, 2002. 29

    2002

  91. [99]

    Optical music recognition on android platform

    Nawapon Luangnapa, Thongchai Silpavarangkura, Chakarida Nukoolkit, and Pornchai Mongkolnam. Optical music recognition on android platform. In International Conference on Advances in Information Technology , pages 106–115. Springer, 2012

    2012

  92. [100]

    Handwritten musical document retrieval using music-score spotting

    Rakesh Malik, Partha Pratim Roy, Umapada Pal, and Fumitaka Kimura. Handwritten musical document retrieval using music-score spotting. In 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 832–836, 2013

    2013

  93. [101]

    Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Hinrich Schütze

    Chirstopher D. Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Hinrich Schütze. Introduction to Information Retrieval . Cambridge University Press, 2008

    2008

  94. [102]

    Matsushima, I

    T. Matsushima, I. Sonomoto, T. Harada, K. Kanamori, and S. Ohteru. Automated high speed recognition of printed music (W ABOT-2 vision system). In International Conference on Advanced Robotics , pages 477–482, 1985

    1985

  95. [103]

    Der vollkommene Capellmeister

    Johann Mattheson. Der vollkommene Capellmeister . Herold, Christian, Hamburg, 1739

  96. [104]

    Mehta and Malay S

    Apurva A. Mehta and Malay S. Bhatt. Optical music notes recognition for printed piano music score sheet. In International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics , Coimbatore, India, 2015

    2015

  97. [105]

    Format of ground truth data used in the evaluation of the results of an optical music recognition system

    Hidetoshi Miyao and Robert Martin Haralick. Format of ground truth data used in the evaluation of the results of an optical music recognition system. In 4th International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems , pages 497–506, Brasil, 2000

    2000

  98. [106]

    Smartscore x2

    Musitek. Smartscore x2. http://www.musitek.com/smartscore-pro.html, 2017

    2017

  99. [107]

    Notateme

    Neuratron. Notateme. http://www.neuratron.com/notateme.html, 2015

    2015

  100. [108]

    Photoscore 2018

    Neuratron. Photoscore 2018. http://www.neuratron.com/photoscore.htm, 2018

    2018

  101. [109]

    Big data optical music recognition with multi images and multi recognisers

    Kia Ng, Alex McLean, and Alan Marsden. Big data optical music recognition with multi images and multi recognisers. In EVA London 2014 on Electronic Visualisation and the Arts , pages 215–218. BCS, 2014

    2014

  102. [110]

    A lightweight and effective music score recognition on mobile phones

    Tam Nguyen and Gueesang Lee. A lightweight and effective music score recognition on mobile phones. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 11(3):438–449, 2015

    2015

  103. [111]

    Introduction to optical music recognition: Overview and practical challenges

    Jiri Novotn `y and Jaroslav Pokorn `y. Introduction to optical music recognition: Overview and practical challenges. In Annual International Workshop on DAtabases, TExts, Specifications and Objects , pages 65–76. CEUR-WS, 2015

    2015

  104. [112]

    Playscore

    Organum. Playscore. http://www.playscore.co, 2016

    2016

  105. [113]

    Choral public domain library

    Rafael Ornes. Choral public domain library. http://cpdl.org, 1998

    1998

  106. [114]

    Digitisation and digital library presentation system – sheet music to the mix

    Tuula Pääkkönen, Jukka Kervinen, and Kimmo Kettunen. Digitisation and digital library presentation system – sheet music to the mix. In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music Systems , pages 21–22, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  107. [115]

    Advancing omr as a community: Best practices for reproducible research

    Alexander Pacha. Advancing omr as a community: Best practices for reproducible research. In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music Systems, pages 19–20, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  108. [116]

    Optical music recognition in mensural notation with region-based convolutional neural networks

    Alexander Pacha and Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza. Optical music recognition in mensural notation with region-based convolutional neural networks. In 19th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , pages 240–247, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  109. [117]

    Handwritten music object detection: Open issues and baseline results

    Alexander Pacha, Kwon-Young Choi, Bertrand Coüasnon, Yann Ricquebourg, Richard Zanibbi, and Horst Eidenberger. Handwritten music object detection: Open issues and baseline results. In 13th International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems , pages 163–168, 2018

    2018

  110. [118]

    Towards a universal music symbol classifier

    Alexander Pacha and Horst Eidenberger. Towards a universal music symbol classifier. In 14th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 35–36, Kyoto, Japan, 2017. IAPR TC10 (Technical Committee on Graphics Recognition), IEEE Computer Society

    2017

  111. [119]

    A baseline for general music object detection with deep learning

    Alexander Pacha, Jan Haji ˇc jr., and Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza. A baseline for general music object detection with deep learning. Applied Sciences, 8(9):1488–1508, 2018

    2018

  112. [120]

    Improving omr for digital music libraries with multiple recognisers and multiple sources

    Victor Padilla, Alan Marsden, Alex McLean, and Kia Ng. Improving omr for digital music libraries with multiple recognisers and multiple sources. In 1st International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology , pages 1–8, London, United Kingdom, 2014. ACM

    2014

  113. [121]

    The seils dataset: Symbolically encoded scores in modern- early notation for computational musicology

    Emilia Parada-Cabaleiro, Anton Batliner, Alice Baird, and Björn Schuller. The seils dataset: Symbolically encoded scores in modern- early notation for computational musicology. In 18th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , Suzhou, China, 2017

    2017

  114. [122]

    Virtual music teacher for new music learners with optical music recognition

    Viet-Khoi Pham, Hai-Dang Nguyen, and Minh-Triet Tran. Virtual music teacher for new music learners with optical music recognition. In International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies , pages 415–426. Springer, 2015

    2015

  115. [123]

    Réjean Plamondon and Sargur N. Srihari. On-line and off-line handwriting recognition: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 22(1):63–84, 2000

    2000

  116. [124]

    David S. Prerau. Computer pattern recognition of printed music. In Fall Joint Computer Conference , pages 153–162, 1971

    1971

  117. [125]

    Songbook romeo & julia, 2005

    Gérard Presgurvic. Songbook romeo & julia, 2005

    2005

  118. [126]

    International music score library project

    Project Petrucci LLC. International music score library project. http://imslp.org, 2006

    2006

  119. [127]

    Automatic Recognition of Sheet Music

    Dennis Howard Pruslin. Automatic Recognition of Sheet Music . PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1966

    1966

  120. [128]

    Optical music recognitoin of early typographic prints using hidden Markov models

    Laurent Pugin. Optical music recognitoin of early typographic prints using hidden Markov models. In 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval , pages 53–56, Victoria, Canada, 2006

    2006

  121. [129]

    Reducing costs for digitising early music with dynamic adaptation

    Laurent Pugin, John Ashley Burgoyne, and Ichiro Fujinaga. Reducing costs for digitising early music with dynamic adaptation. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries , pages 471–474, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    2007

  122. [130]

    Evaluating OMR on the early music online collection

    Laurent Pugin and Tim Crawford. Evaluating OMR on the early music online collection. In 14th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , pages 439–444, Curitiba, Brazil, 2013

    2013

  123. [131]

    Gene Ragan. Kompapp. http://kompapp.com, 2017

    2017

  124. [132]

    Table recognition in heterogeneous documents using machine learning

    Sheikh Faisal Rashid, Abdullah Akmal, Muhammad Adnan, Ali Adnan Aslam, and Andreas Dengel. Table recognition in heterogeneous documents using machine learning. In 2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) , pages 777–782, 2017

    2017

  125. [133]

    Marcal, Carlos Guedes, and Jamie dos Santos Cardoso

    Ana Rebelo, Ichiro Fujinaga, Filipe Paszkiewicz, Andre R.S. Marcal, Carlos Guedes, and Jamie dos Santos Cardoso. Optical music recognition: state-of-the-art and open issues. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval , 1(3):173–190, 2012. 30

    2012

  126. [134]

    Towards the alignment of handwritten music scores

    Pau Riba, Alicia Fornés, and Josep Lladós. Towards the alignment of handwritten music scores. In Graphic Recognition. Current Trends and Challenges, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 103–116. Springer Verlag, 2017

    2017

  127. [135]

    Camera-based optical music recognition using a convolutional neural network

    Adrià Rico Blanes and Alicia Fornés Bisquerra. Camera-based optical music recognition using a convolutional neural network. In 14th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 27–28, Kyoto, Japan, 2017. IEEE

    2017

  128. [136]

    David Rizo, Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, and José M. Iñesta. Muret: A music recognition, encoding, and transcription tool. In 5th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology , pages 52–56, Paris, France, 2018. ACM

    2018

  129. [137]

    Heinz Roggenkemper and Ryan Roggenkemper. How can machine learning make optical music recognition more relevant for practicing musicians? In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music Systems , pages 25–26, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  130. [138]

    The music encoding initiative (MEI)

    Perry Roland. The music encoding initiative (MEI). In 1st International Conference on Musical Applications Using XML , pages 55–59, 2002

    2002

  131. [139]

    A fuzzy model for optical recognition of musical scores

    Florence Rossant and Isabelle Bloch. A fuzzy model for optical recognition of musical scores. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 141(2):165–201, 2004

    2004

  132. [140]

    HMM-based writer identification in music score documents without staff-line removal

    Partha Pratim Roy, Ayan Kumar Bhunia, and Umapada Pal. HMM-based writer identification in music score documents without staff-line removal. Expert Systems with Applications , 89:222–240, 2017

    2017

  133. [141]

    Staats- und universitätsbibliothek dresden

    Sächsische Landesbibliothek. Staats- und universitätsbibliothek dresden. https://www.slub-dresden.de, 2007

    2007

  134. [142]

    Correcting large-scale OMR data with crowdsourcing

    Charalampos Saitis, Andrew Hankinson, and Ichiro Fujinaga. Correcting large-scale OMR data with crowdsourcing. In 1st International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology , pages 1–3. ACM, 2014

    2014

  135. [143]

    Pixel.js: Web-based pixel classification correction platform for ground truth creation

    Zeyad Saleh, Ke Zhang, Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, Gabriel Vigliensoni, and Ichiro Fujinaga. Pixel.js: Web-based pixel classification correction platform for ground truth creation. In 14th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition , pages 39–40, Kyoto, Japan, 2017

    2017

  136. [144]

    The Everything Reading Music Book: A Step-By-Step Introduction to Understanding Music Notation And Theory

    Marc Schobrun. The Everything Reading Music Book: A Step-By-Step Introduction to Understanding Music Notation And Theory . Everything series. Adams Media, 2005

    2005

  137. [145]

    Beyond MIDI: The Handbook of Musical Codes

    Eleanor Selfridge-Field. Beyond MIDI: The Handbook of Musical Codes . MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997

    1997

  138. [146]

    An open approach towards the benchmarking of table structure recognition systems

    Asif Shahab, Faisal Shafait, Thomas Kieninger, and Andreas Dengel. An open approach towards the benchmarking of table structure recognition systems. In 9th International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems , pages 113–120, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,

  139. [147]

    [COMSCAN]: An optical music recognition system

    Muhammad Sharif, Quratul-Ain Arshad, Mudassar Raza, and Wazir Zada Khan. [COMSCAN]: An optical music recognition system. In 7th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology , page 34. ACM, 2009

    2009

  140. [148]

    An end-to-end trainable neural network for image-based sequence recognition and its application to scene text recognition

    Baoguang Shi, Xiang Bai, and Cong Yao. An end-to-end trainable neural network for image-based sequence recognition and its application to scene text recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 39(11):2298–2304, 2017

    2017

  141. [149]

    A music symbols recognition method using pattern matching along with integrated projection and morphological operation techniques

    Mahmood Sotoodeh, Farshad Tajeripour, Sadegh Teimori, and Kirk Jorgensen. A music symbols recognition method using pattern matching along with integrated projection and morphological operation techniques. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(13):16833– 16866, 2018

    2018

  142. [150]

    Standard music font layout (SMuFL)

    Daniel Spreadbury and Robert Piéchaud. Standard music font layout (SMuFL). In First International Conference on Technologies for Music Notation and Representation - TENOR2015 , pages 146–153, Paris, France, 2015. Institut de Recherche en Musicologie

    2015

  143. [151]

    Staffpad

    StaffPad Ltd. Staffpad. http://www.staffpad.net, 2017

    2017

  144. [152]

    Musichand : A handwritten music recognition system

    Gabriel Taubman. Musichand : A handwritten music recognition system. Technical report, Brown University, 2005

    2005

  145. [153]

    Searching the liber usualis: Using CouchDB and elasticsearch to query graphical music documents

    Jessica Thompson, Andrew Hankinson, and Ichiro Fujinaga. Searching the liber usualis: Using CouchDB and elasticsearch to query graphical music documents. In 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , 2011

    2011

  146. [154]

    Deepscores - a dataset for segmentation, detection and classification of tiny objects

    Lukas Tuggener, Ismail Elezi, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Marcello Pelillo, and Thilo Stadelmann. Deepscores - a dataset for segmentation, detection and classification of tiny objects. In 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition , Beijing, China, 2018

    2018

  147. [155]

    MIREX 2013 symbolic melodic similarity: A geometric model supported with hybrid sequence alignment

    Julián Urbano. MIREX 2013 symbolic melodic similarity: A geometric model supported with hybrid sequence alignment. Technical report, Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange, 2013

    2013

  148. [156]

    MIREX 2010 symbolic melodic similarity: Local alignment with geometric representations

    Julián Urbano, Juan Lloréns, Jorge Morato, and Sonia Sánchez-Cuadrado. MIREX 2010 symbolic melodic similarity: Local alignment with geometric representations. Technical report, Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange, 2010

    2010

  149. [157]

    MIREX 2011 symbolic melodic similarity: Sequence alignment with geometric representations

    Julián Urbano, Juan Lloréns, Jorge Morato, and Sonia Sánchez-Cuadrado. MIREX 2011 symbolic melodic similarity: Sequence alignment with geometric representations. Technical report, Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange, 2011

    2011

  150. [158]

    MIREX 2012 symbolic melodic similarity: Hybrid sequence alignment with geometric representations

    Julián Urbano, Juan Lloréns, Jorge Morato, and Sonia Sánchez-Cuadrado. MIREX 2012 symbolic melodic similarity: Hybrid sequence alignment with geometric representations. Technical report, Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange, 2012

    2012

  151. [159]

    Optical music recognition with convolutional sequence-to-sequence models

    Eelco van der Wel and Karen Ullrich. Optical music recognition with convolutional sequence-to-sequence models. In 18th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , Suzhou, China, 2017

    2017

  152. [160]

    Automatic pitch detection in printed square notation

    Gabriel Vigliensoni, John Ashley Burgoyne, Andrew Hankinson, and Ichiro Fujinaga. Automatic pitch detection in printed square notation. In 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference , pages 423–428, Miami, Florida, 2011. University of Miami

    2011

  153. [161]

    Developing an environment for teaching computers to read music

    Gabriel Vigliensoni, Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, and Ichiro Fujinaga. Developing an environment for teaching computers to read music. In 1st International Workshop on Reading Music Systems , pages 27–28, Paris, France, 2018

    2018

  154. [162]

    Recognition of music scores with non-linear distortions in mobile devices

    Quang Nhat V o, Guee Sang Lee, Soo Hyung Kim, and Hyung Jeong Yang. Recognition of music scores with non-linear distortions in mobile devices. Multimedia Tools and Applications , 77(12):15951–15969, 2018

    2018

  155. [163]

    A system for optical music recognition and audio synthesis

    Matthias Wallner. A system for optical music recognition and audio synthesis. Master’s thesis, TU Wien, 2014

    2014

  156. [164]

    Xia and Roger B

    Gus G. Xia and Roger B. Dannenberg. Improvised duet interaction: Learning improvisation techniques for automatic accompaniment. In New Interfaces for Musical Expression , Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark, 2017

    2017

  157. [165]

    Watch, attend and parse: An end-to-end neural network based approach to handwritten mathematical expression recognition

    Jianshu Zhang, Jun Du, Shiliang Zhang, Dan Liu, Yulong Hu, Jinshui Hu, Si Wei, and Lirong Dai. Watch, attend and parse: An end-to-end neural network based approach to handwritten mathematical expression recognition. Pattern Recognition, 71:196–206, 2017. 31 APPENDIX A: OMR B I...

    2017

  158. [166]

    Most of these entries have either a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) or a link to the website, where the publication can be found

    OMR Research Bibliography : A collection of scientific and technical publications, whose biblio- graphical metadata were manually verified for correctness from a trustworthy source (see below). Most of these entries have either a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) or a link to the w...

  159. [167]

    OMR Related Bibliography: A collection of scientific and technical publications, whose bibliograph- ical metadata were manually verified for correctness from a trustworthy source but are not primarily directed towards OMR, such as musicological research or general computer vision papers

  160. [168]

    Unverified OMR Bibliography : A collection of scientific and technical publications, that are related to Optical Music Recognition, but they could not be verified from a trustworthy source and might contain incorrect information. Many publications from this collection were author...

    1990

  161. [169]

    Search on Google Scholar for the title of the work, if necessary with the authors last name and the year of publication

  162. [170]

    Information from the last three services are used with caution and if possible backed up with information from other sources

    Find a trustworthy source such as the original publisher, the authors’ website, the website of the venue (that lists the article in the program) or indexing services including IEEE Xplore Digital Library, ACM Digital Library, Springer Link, Elsevier ScienceDirect, arXiv.org, d...

  163. [171]

    Suspicious information could be if the author’s name is missing letters because of special characters or if the year of publication is before that of cited references

    Manually verify the correctness of the metadata by inspecting and correct it by obtaining the necessary information from another source, e.g., the conference website or the information state in the document. Suspicious information could be if the author’s name is missing lette...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.