Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 47 references

A quantum interference capacitor based on double-passage Landau-Zener-St\"uckelberg-Majorana interferometry

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A microwave-driven double quantum dot becomes a tunable quantum capacitor.

desk verdict Novel capacitor proposal with a clean experimental period-frequency scaling, but the central LZSM transition-rate derivation has a sign error that breaks the amplitude theory. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04069 v2 pith:O4G5Z6AS submitted 2019-08-12 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

Rubén M. Otxoa , Anasua Chatterjee , Sergey N. Shevchenko , Sylvain Barraud , Franco Nori , M. Fernando Gonzalez-Zalba This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majoranainterferometrydoublequantumdotparametriccapacitancecapacitorsiliconnanowiretransistormicrowavedrivingradio-frequencyreflectometrysingle-electrondevice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a single-electron double quantum dot tunnel-coupled to a reservoir, driven repeatedly through an avoided level crossing by a microwave field, behaves as a voltage-tunable capacitor whose parametric capacitance $C_{\mathrm{pm}}$ oscillates sinusoidally with top-gate voltage. The central quantitative claim is the simplified formula $C_{\mathrm{pm}}\approx C_{\mathrm{pm}}^0\cos(2\pi V_{\mathrm{TG}}/\delta V_{\mathrm{TG}})$, with period $\delta V_{\mathrm{TG}}=\pi\hbar\omega/(2\sqrt{2}e\alpha_-)$ proportional to the microwave frequency $\omega$. The paper tests this model in a silicon nanowire double quantum dot using radio-frequency reflectometry and reports agreement across six microwave frequencies, extracting $T_1=50\,\mathrm{ns}$, $T_2=35\,\mathrm{ps}$, and $T_R=30\,\mathrm{ps}$. A sympathetic reader would care because the result turns quantum interference of a single charge into an electronically tunable circuit element, with the capacitance amplitude carrying information about the qubit's relaxation, coherence, and reservoir tunnelling times.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is double-passage Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana interferometry: a two-level system (here the (10)/(01) charge states of a double quantum dot) is swept through its avoided crossing twice per drive cycle, accumulating a Stückelberg phase, and is then projected by tunnelling to an electron reservoir. The mathematical engine is the transition-rate formula of Eqs. (12)-(14), where the Jacobi-Anger expansion converts the periodic drive into a Bessel sum and the white-noise phase correlator $\langle e^{-i\delta\phi(t)}e^{-i\delta\phi(t+\tau)}\rangle=e^{-\tau/T_2}$ turns that sum into an Airy function. Inserting this rate into the master equation for the ground-state probability and differentiating the reservoir-occupation probability with respect to detuning yields the parametric capacitance. The same machinery supplies the simplified cosine law, the frequency-proportional voltage period, and the envelope set by $T_2$ and $T_R$.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to measure the device's charge-noise power spectrum independently, for example by noise spectroscopy or spin-echo-type measurements, and check whether it is white over the bandwidth sampled by the drive; if it is not, the Airy-form rate and the extracted $T_2$ and $T_R$ would need to be rederived. A second check is to vary the drive amplitude $A$ away from $A=\hat{\varepsilon}$ and verify that the period and envelope predicted by Eq. (16) still track the data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that in the double-passage LZSM regime the parametric capacitance of a reservoir-coupled double quantum dot is governed by the derivative of the stationary occupation probability with respect to detuning, and the LZSM transition rate can be expressed in an Airy-function form. Combining these steps yields Eq. (16) for $C_{\mathrm{pm}}$ and, for $\varepsilon_0<A$, the simplified oscillatory form of Eq. (18). The period of the capacitance oscillations is set by the microwave frequency and the gate-coupling asymmetry $\alpha_-$, with no dependence on relaxation parameters, while the oscillation amplitude depends on $T_1$, $T_2$, and $T_R$. The experiment reproduces the predicted frequency dependence of the Fourier peak position and the amplitude envelope, allowing the authors to extract the dynamical timescales. The paper therefore claims that LZSM interferometry can be read out capacitively and used as a working device principle rather than only as a spectroscopy tool.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the phase noise in the driven double quantum dot is white noise with the correlator $\langle e^{-i\delta\phi(t)}e^{-i\delta\phi(t+\tau)}\rangle=e^{-\tau/T_2}$; if the actual charge noise is not white, the Airy-function transition rate, the fitted envelope, and the extracted $T_2$ and $T_R$ are not uniquely supported, and the paper reports no independent measurement of the noise spectrum.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The voltage period of the capacitance oscillations is directly proportional to the microwave frequency, so the device provides a frequency readout in the gate-voltage domain.
  • The oscillation amplitude encodes $T_1$, $T_2$, and $T_R$, so capacitance measurements can extract these dynamical parameters without single-shot measurement.
  • Because the capacitance response is sinusoidal and electrically tunable, the driven double quantum dot can act as a tunable reactive element whose value is set by gate voltage and drive frequency.
  • The model reproduces the measured phase response from 4.72 to 21 GHz, supporting the double-passage LZSM picture for a reservoir-coupled double quantum dot.
  • The non-linear parametric capacitance offers a route to enhanced device functionalities, such as dispersive sensing or parametric effects, based on a single coherent charge.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the frequency-proportional period holds as claimed, the same device could be used as a microwave-frequency-to-voltage transducer, converting a frequency shift into a shift of the capacitance oscillation pattern; the authors do not develop this use.
  • The white-noise phase correlator is a testable assumption: independently measuring the charge-noise spectrum of the device would show whether the Airy-form rate and the extracted $T_2$ and $T_R$ survive for non-white noise.
  • The same double-passage mechanism could be transferred to other reservoir-coupled two-level charge systems, such as superconducting qubits or donor spin qubits, where the predicted cosine law would appear as a generic capacitive signature of LZSM interferometry.
  • Because the capacitance amplitude depends on $T_1$, the device could serve as a built-in relaxation-time monitor during qubit operation, a speculative use not stated in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum interference capacitor based on double-passage Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana interferometry in a double quantum dot tunnel-coupled to an electron reservoir. It derives a parametric capacitance Cpm expressed through the LZSM transition rate W, claims that in the oscillatory regime this capacitance reduces to a cosine in top-gate voltage with a voltage period proportional to the microwave frequency, and tests the model in a silicon nanowire double quantum dot using RF reflectometry. The authors report good qualitative agreement and extract T1 ≈ 50 ns, T2 ≈ 35 ps, TR ≈ 30 ps, and α− ≈ 0.06 from fits to the amplitude and period of the capacitance oscillations.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would add a coherent single-electron device functionality (an electrically tunable capacitor) and a dispersive method for estimating relaxation, dephasing, and reservoir tunneling times in silicon double quantum dots. The experimental observation that the Fourier peak of the capacitance oscillations scales linearly with microwave frequency (Fig. 3c) is a valuable and independent check of the constant-period prediction. On the other hand, the amplitude parametrization and the fitted time constants rest on a derivation that currently contains a sign/dimensional inconsistency, so the strength of the paper depends on correcting and re-validating that derivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (13)-(14)] As written, the integral in Eq. (13) does not converge. The exponent in Eq. (13) can be rewritten as -i(ε0-nω)t + t/T2, so the integrand grows exponentially with t; in the limit τ→∞ used in the rate definition of Eq. (12), W(ε0) diverges. Eq. (14) therefore cannot be derived from Eq. (13) without a sign correction, a different integration domain, or an additional regularization. This is load-bearing because the capacitance amplitude in Eq. (16) and the extracted T2, TR, and T1 values in Fig. 4 depend on the functional form of W. The white-noise correlation assumption behind this step is also unverified experimentally, so the amplitude fit is conditional on a model that is not established by the data.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (16)] After restoring ℏ, Eq. (16) is dimensionally inconsistent. With ζ=(2ω/A)^(1/3) and A an energy, ζ/(ℏω) does not have units of inverse energy, and ζ(ε0-A)/(ℏω) is not dimensionless; the prefactor in Eq. (16) is therefore not a capacitance. The authors need to redefine ζ, presumably involving ℏ, and re-derive all prefactors, since the fits in Fig. 4 use this expression.
  3. [Section II, Eq. (18)] The reduction of Eq. (16) to the constant-period cosine in Eq. (18) is asserted without derivation. Eq. (16) contains a product Ai(z)Ai'(z)/(1+γAi²(z))² in the argument z=ζ(ε0-A)/(ℏω); the zero spacing of this function is not obviously constant in VTG, so the claim that Cpm≈C0pm cos(2πVTG/δVTG) over ε0<A requires an explicit asymptotic argument or numerical check. The experimental linearity in Fig. 3(c) provides support, but it does not replace the derivation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (12)] The rate definition should involve a stationary time average or ensemble average over the starting time t; as written, a single product Δθ(t)Δθ*(t+τ) is ambiguous.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 2(c) caption] The text contains apparent typos: 's uential operations' should be 'sequential operations', and 'see Fig.. 1(d)' has an extra period.
  3. [Section IV, Fig. 4] The fitting protocol for the envelope in Fig. 4(a) and the frequency dependence in Fig. 4(b) is not described; please specify the cost function, parameter bounds, and uncertainties, and include residuals or error bars.
  4. [Section IV, Eq. (19)] The values of VTG0 and A are quoted without uncertainty; please state how A=1.35 meV and VTG0=0.475 V are determined.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the amplitude agreement in Figs. 3(b) and 4 is a re-plot of T1, T2, and TR fitted to the same envelope and frequency sweep; the period-frequency linearity in Fig. 3(c) is the independent check.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV, text accompanying Figs. 3(b), 4(a), and 4(b).]
    "The shape of the envelope allows determining T2 = 35 ps and TR = 30 ps, extracted from the fit (red lines in Fig. 4(a)). ... In Fig. 4(b), we plot the best fit, using the already extracted values of T2 = 35 ps and TR = 30 ps, and find T1 = 50 ns. ... In Fig. 3(b), we show the normalized parametric capacitance obtained with Eq. (16) using the same frequencies as in the experiment, with T1 = 50 ns, T2 = 35 ps, and TR = 30 ps."

    In Eq. (16), the amplitude of the predicted capacitance is controlled by T1, T2, and TR through gamma and the exp(-t1/T2) and reservoir factors. These three time constants are extracted from the same experimental envelope (Fig. 4a) and peak-to-peak frequency sweep (Fig. 4b) that Fig. 3(b) then claims to reproduce with Eq. (16). The agreement is therefore a plot of the fit, not an independent confirmation of the amplitude dependence; the amplitude part of the central claim is statistically forced by the fitting procedure. Only the linear period-frequency relation in Fig. 3(c) is an out-of-sample check, since alpha- is a single slope parameter and the linearity itself is not imposed by the fit.

full rationale

The analytic derivation leading to Eq. (16) is self-contained in the sense that the parametric capacitance is computed from a LZSM transition rate and a master equation; the target result is not inserted as an input. The period-frequency proportionality, delta_VTG proportional to omega, is a genuine independent finding: it is tested in Fig. 3(c) with alpha- as the only fitted slope, and the linearity is nontrivial. The amplitude part of the claim, however, is only validated by fitting T2 and TR to the envelope shape and T1 to the frequency dependence of the amplitude, then presenting the same fitted values as the model curves in Figs. 3(b) and 4. That is a partial circularity in the empirical validation, not in the derivation itself. I find no load-bearing self-citation chain: references 33, 40, and 41 include overlapping authors, but Eq. (3) is a standard electrostatic relation with independent content, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives. The skeptic's objections to Eqs. (13)-(16) (the e^{+t/T2} growth in the integrand and the non-dimensionless Airy argument) are mathematical derivation concerns, not circularity; if correct, they would further weaken the fitted-parameter extraction, but they do not change the circularity assessment. Overall score 5.0: one central amplitude 'reproduction' reduces to a fit of the same data, while the period-frequency relation remains independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on four fitted time constants or couplings and on a white-noise Markovian treatment of the double quantum dot and reservoir system. No new physical entities such as particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced; the quantum interference capacitor is a circuit function, not a new entity.

free parameters (5)
  • T2 (dephasing time) = 35 ps
    Extracted from the envelope of the capacitance oscillations in Fig. 4(a) and used in Eqs. (16)-(17) to reproduce the measured curves.
  • TR (quantum dot to reservoir tunneling time) = 30 ps
    Extracted together with T2 from the same envelope fit in Fig. 4(a).
  • T1 (relaxation time) = 50 ns
    Extracted from the peak-to-peak amplitude versus frequency in Fig. 4(b), using T2 and TR from the earlier envelope fit.
  • alpha_- (average quantum dot gate coupling difference) = 0.06 ± 0.004
    Obtained from the linear fit of the capacitance oscillation period versus microwave frequency in Fig. 3(c); it converts gate voltage to detuning through Eq. (19).
  • Drive amplitude A = 1.35 meV (set to epsilon_hat)
    Amplitude of the microwave-induced detuning oscillations, chosen in the analysis to match the reservoir crossing; it controls the Airy argument in Eq. (16) and the reduced-detuning axis in Fig. 4(a).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Two-level Hamiltonian H(t) = -(Delta/2) sigma_x - (epsilon(t)/2) sigma_z, with sinusoidally driven detuning and constant tunnel coupling Delta.
    Underpins all LZSM dynamics and assumes higher orbital, valley, or spin levels can be neglected.
  • domain assumption Markovian master equation for populations with rates W(epsilon0) and Gamma1, with the reservoir entering only as an incoherent tunneling probability PR.
    Neglects coherent coupling to the reservoir and memory effects; used in Eqs. (4)-(7).
  • domain assumption Phase noise is white with correlation <e^{-i delta_phi(t)} e^{-i delta_phi(t+tau)}> = e^{-tau/T2}.
    Used in Eq. (13) to convert the Bessel sum into the Airy form; no direct measurement of the noise spectrum is provided.
  • standard math Large-order Bessel to Airy asymptotic approximation and the pi cot(pi z) summation identity.
    Mathematical approximations needed to go from Eq. (13) to Eq. (14).
  • domain assumption Low-temperature limit kBT much less than Delta, so the upward relaxation rate Gamma_hat_1 is zero.
    Used in Eq. (5); appropriate for the 35 mK experiment if Delta is meV-scale, but still an assumption.
  • domain assumption Measured phase response Delta_Phi is proportional to the parametric capacitance Cpm with a constant normalizing factor and no significant background.
    Used throughout Section III and IV; the normalization absorbs unknown gain so absolute Cpm is not calibrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A quantum interference capacitor based on double-passage Landau-Zener-St\"uckelberg-Majorana interferometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O4G5Z6AS

@misc{pith2026190804069,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A quantum interference capacitor based on double-passage Landau-Zener-St\"uckelberg-Majorana interferometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O4G5Z6AS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04069}
}
read the original abstract

The implementation of quantum technologies in electronics leads naturally to the concept of coherent single-electron circuits, in which a single charge is used coherently to provide enhanced performance. In this work, we propose a coherent single-electron device that operates as an electrically-tunable capacitor. This system exhibits a sinusoidal dependence of the capacitance with voltage, in which the amplitude of the capacitance changes and the voltage period can be tuned by electric means. The device concept is based on double-passage Landau-Zener-St\"uckelberg-Majorana interferometry of a coupled two-level system that is further tunnel-coupled to an electron reservoir. We test this model experimentally by performing Landau-Zener-St\"uckelberg-Majorana interferometry in a single-electron double quantum dot coupled to an electron reservoir and show that the voltage period of the capacitance oscillations is directly proportional to the excitation frequency and that the amplitude of the oscillations depends on the dynamical parameters of the system: intrinsic relaxation and coherence time, as well as the tunneling rate to the reservoir. Our work opens up an opportunity to use the non-linear capacitance of double quantum dots to obtain enhanced device functionalities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04069 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Quantum interference capacitor proposal. (a) Schematic illustration of a DQD coupled to a reservoir and the relevant charge states and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experiment. (a) Scanning electron microscope image of a device similar to the one measured connected to a radio frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Microwave frequency dependence: experiment and theory. (a) Experimental normalized response of the resonator phase shift as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Amplitude analysis. (a) Experimental normalized phase re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author A. M. \ Zagoskin ,\ @noop title Quantum Engineering: Theory and Design of Quantum Coherent Structures \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Gu , author A

    author author X. Gu , author A. F. \ Kockum , author A. Miranowicz , author Y. xi Liu , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits , \ @noop journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 718-719 ,\ pages 1--102 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Ac \' n , author I

    author author A. Ac \' n , author I. Bloch , author H. Buhrman , author T. Calarco , author C. Eichler , author J. Eisert , author D. Esteve , author N. Gisin , author S. J. \ Glaser , author F. Jelezko , author S. Kuhr , author M. Lewenstein , author M. F. \ Riedel , author P. O. \ Schmidt , author R. Thew , author A. Wallraff , author I. Walmsley , \ an...

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aad1ea

  4. [4]

    author author C. L. \ Degen , author F. Reinhard , \ and\ author P. Cappellaro ,\ title title Quantum sensing , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 035002 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 2017

  5. [5]

    Roy \ and\ author M

    author author A. Roy \ and\ author M. Devoret ,\ title title Introduction to parametric amplification of quantum signals with josephson circuits , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2016.07.012 journal journal Comptes Rendus Physique \ volume 17 ,\ pages 740--755 ( year 2016 ) ,\ note quantum microwaves / Micro-ondes quantiques NoStop

    doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2016.07.012 2016

  6. [6]

    Fast gate-based readout of silicon quantum dots using Josephson parametric amplification

    author author S. Schaal , author I. Ahmed , author J. A. \ Haigh , author L. Hutin , author B. Bertrand , author S. Barraud , author M. Vinet , author C.-M. \ Lee , author N. Stelmashenko , author J. W. A. \ Robinson , author J. Y. \ Qiu , author S. Hacohen-Gourgy , author I. Siddiqi , author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba , \ and\ author J. J. L. \ Morton ,\ tit...

    work page Pith review arXiv 1907

  7. [7]

    Nakamura ,\ @noop title Nonadiabatic transition: concepts, basic theories and applications \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    author author H. Nakamura ,\ @noop title Nonadiabatic transition: concepts, basic theories and applications \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    author author S. N. \ Shevchenko ,\ @noop title Mesoscopic Physics meets Quantum Engineering \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page 2019

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Buluta , author S

    author author I. Buluta , author S. Ashhab , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation , \ @noop journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 74 ,\ pages 104401 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  2. [10]

    author author A. V. \ Shytov , author D. A. \ Ivanov , \ and\ author M. V. \ Feigel'man ,\ title title Landau-Zener interferometry for qubits , \ @noop journal journal Eur. Phys. J. B \ volume 36 ,\ pages 263--269 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  3. [11]

    author author S. N. \ Shevchenko , author S. Ashhab , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Landau-Zener-St\"uckelberg interferometry , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 492 ,\ pages 1--30 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  4. [12]

    author author J. R. \ Rubbmark , author M. M. \ Kash , author M. G. \ Littman , \ and\ author D. Kleppner ,\ title title Dynamical effects at avoided level crossings: A study of the Landau-Zener effect using R ydberg atoms , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 23 ,\ ...

    1981

  5. [13]

    author author W. D. \ Oliver , author Y. Yu , author J. C. \ Lee , author K. K. \ Berggren , author L. S. \ Levitov , \ and\ author T. P. \ Orlando ,\ title title Mach-Zehnder interferometry in a strongly driven superconducting qubit , \ @noop journal journal Science \ volume ...

    2005

  6. [14]

    author author D. M. \ Berns , author W. D. \ Oliver , author S. O. \ Valenzuela , author A. V. \ Shytov , author K. K. \ Berggren , author L. S. \ Levitov , \ and\ author T. P. \ Orlando ,\ title title Coherent quasiclassical dynamics of a persistent current qubit , \ @noop jo...

    2006

  7. [15]

    author author G. D. \ Fuchs , author G. Burkard , author P. V. \ Klimov , \ and\ author D. D. \ Awschalom ,\ title title A quantum memory intrinsic to single nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 789--793 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  8. [16]

    Stehlik , author Y

    author author J. Stehlik , author Y. Dovzhenko , author J. R. \ Petta , author J. R. \ Johansson , author F. Nori , author H. Lu , \ and\ author A. C. \ Gossard ,\ title title Landau- Z ener- S t\"uckelberg interferometry of a single electron charge qubit , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB....

    doi

  9. [17]

    Dupont-Ferrier , author B

    author author E. Dupont-Ferrier , author B. Roche , author B. Voisin , author X. Jehl , author R. Wacquez , author M. Vinet , author M. Sanquer , \ and\ author S. De Franceschi ,\ title title Coherent coupling of two dopants in a silicon nanowire probed by Landau-Zener-St\"uck...

    2013

  10. [18]

    author author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba , author S. N. \ Shevchenko , author S. Barraud , author J. R. \ Johansson , author A. J. \ Ferguson , author F. Nori , \ and\ author A. C. \ Betz ,\ title title Gate-sensing coherent charge oscillations in a silicon field-effect transistor...

    2016

  11. [19]

    Ono , author S

    author author K. Ono , author S. N. \ Shevchenko , author T. Mori , author S. Moriyama , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Quantum interferometry with a g -factor-tunable spin qubit , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 122 ,\ pages 207703 ( year 2019 a ) NoStop

    2019

  12. [20]

    Ono , author S

    author author K. Ono , author S. N. \ Shevchenko , author T. Mori , author S. Moriyama , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Single-spin qubit analogous to a quantum heat engine , \ @noop journal journal Preprint \ ( year 2019 b ) NoStop

    2019

  13. [21]

    author author K. C. \ Miao , author A. Bourassa , author C. P. \ Anderson , author S. J. \ Whiteley , author A. L. \ Crook , author S. L. \ Bayliss , author G. Wolfowicz , author G. Thiering , author P. Udvarhelyi , author V. Ivady , author H. Abe , author T. Ohshima , author ...

    1905 arXiv

  14. [22]

    author author J. R. \ Petta , author H. Lu , \ and\ author A. C. \ Gossard ,\ title title A coherent beam splitter for electronic spin states , \ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 327 ,\ pages 669--672 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  15. [23]

    author author D. M. \ Berns , author M. S. \ Rudner , author S. O. \ Valenzuela , author K. K. \ Berggren , author W. D. \ Oliver , author L. S. \ Levitov , \ and\ author T. P. \ Orlando ,\ title title Amplitude spectroscopy of a solid-state artificial atom , \ @noop journal j...

    2008

  16. [24]

    Yiwen , author C

    author author W. Yiwen , author C. Shanhua , author W. Xueda , author P. Cheng , author S. Guozhu , author C. Jian , author K. Lin , author W. Xu , author Y. Yu , \ and\ author P. Wu ,\ title title Quantum interference induced by multiple Landau-Zener transitions in a strongly...

    2010

  17. [25]

    \ Chen , author X.-D

    author author J.-D. \ Chen , author X.-D. \ Wen , author G.-Z. \ Sun , \ and\ author Y. Yu ,\ title title Landau-Zener-St \"u ckelberg interference in a multi-anticrossing system , \ @noop journal journal Chin. Phys. B \ volume 20 ,\ pages 088501 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  18. [26]

    Ferr \' o n , author D

    author author A. Ferr \' o n , author D. Dom \' nguez , \ and\ author M. J. \ S \' a nchez ,\ title title Dynamic transition in Landau-Zener -St \"u ckelberg interferometry of dissipative systems: The case of the flux qubit , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\...

    2016

  19. [27]

    author author M. P. \ Silveri , author J. A. \ Tuorila , author E. V. \ Thuneberg , \ and\ author G. S. \ Paraoanu ,\ title title Quantum systems under frequency modulation , \ @noop journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 056002 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  20. [28]

    author author A. A. \ Reynoso \ and\ author K. Flensberg ,\ title title Dephasing and hyperfine interaction in carbon nanotubes double quantum dots: Disordered case , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 85 ,\ pages 195441 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  21. [29]

    Shi , author C

    author author Z. Shi , author C. B. \ Simmons , author D. R. \ Ward , author J. R. \ Prance , author X. Wu , author T. S. \ Koh , author J. K. \ Gamble , author D. E. \ Savage , author M. G. \ Lagally , author M. Friesen , author S. N. \ Coppersmith , \ and\ author M. A. \ Eri...

    2014

  22. [30]

    Stehlik , author M

    author author J. Stehlik , author M. Z. \ Maialle , author M. H. \ Degani , \ and\ author J. R. \ Petta ,\ title title Role of multilevel Landau-Zener interference in extreme harmonic generation , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 075307 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  23. [31]

    \ Chen , author B.-C

    author author B.-B. \ Chen , author B.-C. \ Wang , author G. Cao , author H.-O. \ Li , author M. Xiao , author G.-C. \ Guo , author H.-W. \ Jiang , author X. Hu , \ and\ author G.-P. \ Guo ,\ title title Spin blockade and coherent dynamics of high-spin states in a three-electr...

    2017

  24. [32]

    Qi , author X

    author author Z. Qi , author X. Wu , author D. R. \ Ward , author J. R. \ Prance , author D. Kim , author J. K. \ Gamble , author R. T. \ Mohr , author Z. Shi , author D. E. \ Savage , author M. G. \ Lagally , author M. A. \ Eriksson , author M. Friesen , author S. N. \ Copper...

    2017

  25. [33]

    Chatterjee , author S

    author author A. Chatterjee , author S. N. \ Shevchenko , author S. Barraud , author R. M. \ Otxoa , author F. Nori , author J. J. L. \ Morton , \ and\ author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba ,\ title title A silicon-based single-electron interferometer coupled to a fermionic sea , \ @n...

    2018

  26. [34]

    author author S. N. \ Shevchenko , author A. I. \ Ryzhov , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Low-frequency spectroscopy for quantum multilevel systems , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 98 ,\ pages 195434 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  27. [35]

    author author W. J. \ Pasek , author M. Z. \ Maialle , \ and\ author M. H. \ Degani ,\ title title Application of the Landau-Zener-Stuckelberg-Majorana dynamics to the electrically driven flip of a hole spin , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 115417 ( ...

    2018

  28. [36]

    Voisin , author V.-H

    author author B. Voisin , author V.-H. \ Nguyen , author J. Renard , author X. Jehl , author S. Barraud , author F. Triozon , author M. Vinet , author I. Duchemin , author Y.-M. \ Niquet , author S. de Franceschi , \ and\ author M. Sanquer ,\ title title Few-electron edge-stat...

    2014

  29. [37]

    author author D. J. \ Ibberson , author L. Bourdet , author J. C. \ Abadillo-Uriel , author I. Ahmed , author S. Barraud , author M. J. \ Calderón , author Y.-M. \ Niquet , \ and\ author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba ,\ title title Electric-field tuning of the valley splitting in sil...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Bogan , author S

    author author A. Bogan , author S. Studenikin , author M. Korkusinski , author L. Gaudreau , author P. Zawadzki , author A. S. \ Sachrajda , author L. Tracy , author J. Reno , \ and\ author T. Hargett ,\ title title Landau-zener-st\"uckelberg-majorana interferometry of a singl...

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author J. V. \ Koski , author A. J. \ Landig , author A. P\'alyi , author P. Scarlino , author C. Reichl , author W. Wegscheider , author G. Burkard , author A. Wallraff , author K. Ensslin , \ and\ author T. Ihn ,\ title title Floquet spectroscopy of a strongly driven ...

    doi

  32. [40]

    Mizuta , author R

    author author R. Mizuta , author R. M. \ Otxoa , author A. C. \ Betz , \ and\ author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba ,\ title title Quantum and tunneling capacitance in charge and spin qubits , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 045414 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  33. [41]

    Esterli , author R

    author author M. Esterli , author R. M. \ Otxoa , \ and\ author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba ,\ title title Small-signal equivalent circuit for double quantum dots at low-frequencies , \ 10.1063/1.5098889 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 114 ,\ pages 253505 ( year 20...

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba , author S. Barraud , author A. J. \ Ferguson , \ and\ author A. C. \ Betz ,\ title title Probing the limits of gate-based charge sensing , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 6084 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  35. [43]

    author author J. I. \ Colless , author A. C. \ Mahoney , author J. M. \ Hornibrook , author A. C. \ Doherty , author H. Lu , author A. C. \ Gossard , \ and\ author D. J. \ Reilly ,\ title title Dispersive readout of a few-electron double quantum dot with fast rf gate sensors ,...

    2013

  36. [44]

    Ahmed , author J

    author author I. Ahmed , author J. A. \ Haigh , author S. Schaal , author S. Barraud , author Y. Zhu , author C.-M. \ Lee , author M. Amado , author J. W. A. \ Robinson , author A. Rossi , author J. J. L. \ Morton , \ and\ author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba ,\ title title Radio-fre...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Pakkiam , author A

    author author P. Pakkiam , author A. V. \ Timofeev , author M. G. \ House , author M. R. \ Hogg , author T. Kobayashi , author M. Koch , author S. Rogge , \ and\ author M. Y. \ Simmons ,\ title title Single-shot single-gate rf spin readout in silicon , \ 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.041...

    doi

  38. [46]

    West , author B

    author author A. West , author B. Hensen , author A. Jouan , author T. Tanttu , author C.-H. \ Yang , author A. Rossi , author M. F. \ Gonzalez-Zalba , author F. Hudson , author A. Morello , author D. J. \ Reilly , \ and\ author A. S. \ Dzurak ,\ title title Gate-based single-...

    doi

  39. [47]

    Zheng , author N

    author author G. Zheng , author N. Samkharadze , author M. L. \ Noordam , author N. Kalhor , author D. Brousse , author A. Sammak , author G. Scappucci , \ and\ author L. M. K. \ Vandersypen ,\ title title Rapid gate-based spin read-out in silicon using an on-chip resonator , ...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.