REVIEW 2 cited by
Integration-by-parts reductions of Feynman integrals using Singular and GPI-Space
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce an algebro-geometrically motived integration-by-parts (IBP) reduction method for multi-loop and multi-scale Feynman integrals, using a framework for massively parallel computations in computer algebra. This framework combines the computer algebra system Singular with the workflow management system GPI-Space, which is being developed at the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics (ITWM). In our approach, the IBP relations are first trimmed by modern algebraic geometry tools and then solved by sparse linear algebra and our new interpolation methods. These steps are efficiently automatized and automatically parallelized by modeling the algorithm in GPI-Space using the language of Petri-nets. We demonstrate the potential of our method at the nontrivial example of reducing two-loop five-point nonplanar double-pentagon integrals. We also use GPI-Space to convert the basis of IBP reductions, and discuss the possible simplification of IBP coefficients in a uniformly transcendental basis.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection
Kira 3 cuts Feynman-integral reduction cost by up to two orders of magnitude using smarter seeding and equation selection.
-
Rational-function interpolation from p-adic evaluations in scattering amplitude calculations
A p-adic interpolation method reconstructs loop-amplitude rational functions directly in partial-fractioned form, cutting required probes by about 25x and output size by about 134x on a challenging two-loop five-point...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.