Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Detecting semantic anomalies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.04388 v3 pith:2OXYEMWA submitted 2019-08-13 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords semanticbenchmarkspracticalcontextdetectionimprovedinterestaccompanying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We critically appraise the recent interest in out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and question the practical relevance of existing benchmarks. While the currently prevalent trend is to consider different datasets as OOD, we argue that out-distributions of practical interest are ones where the distinction is semantic in nature for a specified context, and that evaluative tasks should reflect this more closely. Assuming a context of object recognition, we recommend a set of benchmarks, motivated by practical applications. We make progress on these benchmarks by exploring a multi-task learning based approach, showing that auxiliary objectives for improved semantic awareness result in improved semantic anomaly detection, with accompanying generalization benefits.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools