REVIEW 5 cited by
Attention is not not Explanation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Attention mechanisms play a central role in NLP systems, especially within recurrent neural network (RNN) models. Recently, there has been increasing interest in whether or not the intermediate representations offered by these modules may be used to explain the reasoning for a model's prediction, and consequently reach insights regarding the model's decision-making process. A recent paper claims that `Attention is not Explanation' (Jain and Wallace, 2019). We challenge many of the assumptions underlying this work, arguing that such a claim depends on one's definition of explanation, and that testing it needs to take into account all elements of the model, using a rigorous experimental design. We propose four alternative tests to determine when/whether attention can be used as explanation: a simple uniform-weights baseline; a variance calibration based on multiple random seed runs; a diagnostic framework using frozen weights from pretrained models; and an end-to-end adversarial attention training protocol. Each allows for meaningful interpretation of attention mechanisms in RNN models. We show that even when reliable adversarial distributions can be found, they don't perform well on the simple diagnostic, indicating that prior work does not disprove the usefulness of attention mechanisms for explainability.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Explainability in Media Bias Detection
In media bias detection, explanation plausibility and mechanistic faithfulness are distinct axes that vary independently across model architectures and finetuning strategies.
-
AgentWatcher: A Rule-based Prompt Injection Monitor
An attention-attribution plus rule-reasoning detector reduces prompt-injection success to near zero on agent and long-context benchmarks with small utility loss.
-
Compute Can't Handle the Truth: Why Communication Tax Prioritizes Memory and Interconnects in Modern AI Infrastructure
A CXL-based disaggregated memory architecture with hybrid XLink interconnects is proposed and prototyped, claiming large speedups for memory-bound AI and HPC workloads.
-
SFT-GO: Supervised Fine-Tuning with Group Optimization for Large Language Models
SFT-GO retrains LLMs by focusing on the worst-performing group of important or unimportant tokens, yielding modest average benchmark improvements over standard supervised fine-tuning.
-
Thinking About Thinking: SAGE-nano's Inverse Reasoning for Self-Aware Language Models
A 4B-parameter model is claimed to explain its own reasoning through inverse attention analysis, but the paper offers no consistent evidence or artifacts.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.