A Fluctuation Theory of Topological Susceptibility

Bhupendra Nath Tiwari

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 119 references

A Fluctuation Theory of Topological Susceptibility

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chiral perturbation theory's topological susceptibility has identically zero fluctuation curvature, so the quark-mass/pion-mass surface is non-interacting.

desk verdict A sign error in the third derivative makes the central N=0 claim false as printed, and even after fixing the sign the Ruppeiner-type correlation interpretation rests on an unsupported domain transfer. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06018 v1 pith:AJJO6UYI submitted 2019-08-09 hep-lat hep-phhep-th

Bhupendra Nath Tiwari This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lathep-phhep-th

keywords (2+1)-flavorQCDtopologicalsusceptibilitychiralperturbationtheoryfermionsstatisticalfluctuationsintrinsicgeometrynoiseinstabilitiesscalarcurvature

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the chiral perturbation theory (ChPT) topological susceptibility of (2+1)-flavor QCD, seen as a function of the quark mass and of the mass scale fixing renormalized pion masses, carries no long-range statistical correlations. Using the fluctuation-theory dictionary that reads the correlation volume off the scalar curvature of a Hessian metric, it computes that curvature and finds it vanishes identically, because the third-derivative determinant N in Eq. (38) is zero for all (m,M). The paper therefore concludes that the ChPT fluctuation surface is a non-interacting statistical basis with no phase transitions, while the slab sub-volume lattice method is generically interacting and becomes degenerate in the infinitesimal slab limit. The result matters because it makes a direct, checkable claim about QCD vacuum fluctuations: mass-parameter fluctuations of the topological susceptibility are completely uncorrelated under this description.

What carries the argument

The central object is the scalar curvature of the two-dimensional fluctuation surface whose metric is the Hessian of the embedding function, $g_{ij}=\partial^2\chi/\partial x_i\partial x_j$. In two dimensions this curvature is $(k_B/2)N/D^2$, where $D$ is the determinant of the Hessian and $N$ is the determinant of the $3\times 3$ matrix of second and third derivatives; the paper adopts the correspondence $V_{\mathrm{corr}}\sim R$ between this curvature and the correlation volume. The load-bearing identity is that for the ChPT susceptibility $N\equiv 0$, making $R$ identically zero and hence the system non-interacting. For the slab sub-volume susceptibility, the same curvature becomes a ratio of polynomials in $t=t_1-t_2$, and its denominator vanishes at the roots $t_\pm$, which the paper identifies as possible phase-transition separations.

What would settle it

Evaluate the determinant $N$ in Eq. (38) for a next-to-leading-order ChPT susceptibility that includes the $O(p^6)$ terms omitted from Eq. (22); if $N$ is nonzero at any physical $(m,M)$, the paper's central claim fails for the extended model. A lattice measurement of the topological-charge correlation length across nearby quark masses would settle the physical question directly: a nonzero correlation volume in a region where the paper predicts $R=0$ would falsify the correspondence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that every chiral perturbation theory (ChPT) configuration of the topological susceptibility gives a non-interacting statistical basis in the plane of the quark mass m and the mass scale M that defines renormalized pion masses. Concretely, using the susceptibility $\chi(m,M)=am+\tilde{b}m^2-bm^2\ln m+bm^2\ln M$, the determinant $N$ built from its third derivatives in Eq. (38) vanishes for all $(m,M)$; through the identity $R=(k_B/2)N/D^2$ this forces the scalar curvature $R$ of the Hessian metric to vanish everywhere. In the fluctuation-theory correspondence, zero curvature is zero correlation volume and zero correlation length, so the paper concludes there are no phase transitions and no long-range correlations in this ChPT fluctuation surface. The same machinery applied to the slab sub-volume susceptibility produces a rational curvature that diverges at two slab separations $t_\pm$ (interacting configurations and candidate phase transitions) and that takes an indeterminate $0/0$ form in the infinitesimal slab limit, which the paper reads as a degenerate statistical system.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the fluctuation-theory relation between scalar curvature and correlation volume, developed for equilibrium thermodynamic surfaces, transfers unchanged to the topological susceptibility treated as an embedding function on $(m,M)$ and $(t_1,t_2)$; if that dictionary does not apply to QCD observables, a vanishing $R$ does not by itself mean the system is non-interacting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Under the paper's correspondence, the ChPT topological susceptibility has zero correlation length in $(m,M)$ space, so mass-parameter fluctuations cannot drive phase transitions in this description.
The finite slab sub-volume method is generically interacting: its scalar curvature is a nonzero rational function of $t$, diverging at the two separations $t_\pm$ given by Eq. (69).
At the eight roots of Eq. (67), together with $t=0$, the slab curvature vanishes, giving nine candidate non-interacting slab configurations with no global correlations.
In the infinitesimal slab limit $t_1\to t_2$, the fluctuation determinant vanishes identically, so the slab method's fluctuation surface is degenerate and its curvature is an ill-defined $0/0$ form.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The identity $N=0$ is a direct consequence of the one-loop functional form of Eq. (22); extending $\chi(m,M)$ to higher chiral order would generically produce a nonzero $N$, so the 'always non-interacting' claim is likely tied to the truncation used.
If the fluctuation-theory dictionary is taken literally, a lattice measurement of the connected topological-charge correlation volume at two nearby quark masses would provide a direct test: a nonzero measured correlation volume where $R=0$ would indicate the dictionary, not the vacuum, is what fails.
The slab-method phase-transition roots $t_\pm$ depend on lattice volume $V$ and the integration constants of the flow equations, so scanning $R(t)$ over those parameters could give a practical prescription for choosing slab separations that minimize auto-correlation and bias.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: the paper's central claim is a sign error away from being an algebraic identity, but as written it is false; and even after fixing the sign, the physical conclusion does not follow. In Section 3 the author asserts that substituting the third derivatives of Eq. (39) into the determinant N of Eq. (38) makes N vanish identically. Direct substitution gives a nonzero determinant for generic (m,M). The printed chi_MMM = -2b m^2/M^3 has the wrong sign; with +2b m^2/M^3, N indeed vanishes identically. So the algebraic claim can be repaired, but the manuscript as it stands contains a load-bearing error.

What is genuinely new: taking the Hessian of the ChPT topological susceptibility and the slab sub-volume formula to define a Ruppeiner-type curvature, then asking where it vanishes, is not in the cited literature. The slab section carries the determinant and curvature algebra through in some detail, which is more than a hand-wave. The references to the slab method and to Aoki et al. are appropriate, and the computation is self-contained.

Soft spots, in order: 1. The sign error in chi_MMM is easy to fix, but the paper does not fix it and simply states the wrong result. 2. The bigger issue is the domain transfer. Ruppeiner's V_corr ~ R is derived for equilibrium thermodynamic fluctuation theory with the Hessian of the entropy. Here phi is the topological susceptibility and (m,M) are not the natural extensive variables of the (2+1)-flavor ensemble; no limiting argument or numerical check is given. So interpreting N=0 as a non-interacting statistical basis is a conjecture, not a result. 3. Section 3 also prints chi_M with a sign inconsistent with chi_MM and chi_mM; presumably a typo, but it compounds the uncertainty. 4. The infinitesimal slab section ends in an indeterminate 0/0 form, so no usable comparison with ChPT emerges there.

Heavy self-citation of the author's thermodynamic-geometry papers is present, but the core computation is self-contained, so I do not treat that as a substantive flaw.

Who this is for: someone cataloging applications of thermodynamic geometry to QCD-derived observables might want to note this, but not rely on it. It should not be cited for the non-interacting claim. I would not send it to peer review in its current form; with a corrected sign and, more importantly, an actual justification for why Ruppeiner's correspondence applies to this embedding, it could become a modest note. As is, a referee would spend the time rediscovering the sign error and the unsupported transfer.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes to apply Ruppeiner thermodynamic geometry to the topological susceptibility chi(m,M) of Eq. (1), viewed as an embedding phi: M^2 -> R in the parameter space of the quark mass m and the renormalization mass scale M. It claims that for the chiral perturbation theory (ChPT) form, the Ruppeiner scalar curvature in Eq. (19) vanishes identically because the determinant N in Eq. (38) is zero, so the ChPT configuration is a non-interacting statistical basis with no phase transitions. For the slab sub-volume formula in Eq. (13), the paper derives a rational expression for the scalar curvature in the slab separation t and concludes that finite slabs are generically interacting with possible phase transitions at the roots of Eq. (68), while infinitesimal slabs give a degenerate 0/0 system in Section 5. The paper also discusses stability conditions, flow equations, and qualitative numerical plots in Section 6.

Significance. If the central N=0 result were correct, it would be a notable structural statement about correlations in the ChPT parameterization, and the paper makes an interesting attempt to compare ChPT and slab sub-volume methods in a unified geometric language. The algebraic derivations are presented explicitly and the model parameters are specified in Section 6.1.1, which makes the calculations checkable and falsifiable. However, the central claim is invalidated by the manuscript's own derivative expressions, and the physical interpretation depends on an unproven transfer of Ruppeiner's fluctuation theory from entropy Hessians to an arbitrary embedding function. The paper does not present new lattice data or a quantitative numerical prediction beyond algebraic curves, so its contribution is not sufficient for publication in its current form.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 3, Eqs. (38)-(39)] The determinant N in Eq. (38) does not vanish identically when the second and third derivatives from Eqs. (29), (30), and (39) are substituted. Factoring the matrix with r = m/M gives N = -8 b^3 r^4 [2 ln(M/m) + 2 btilde/b - 1] / m^2, which is nonzero for generic (m,M) and vanishes only on the codimension-one curve ln(M/m) = 1/2 - btilde/b. This directly contradicts the statement following Eq. (39) that the determinant N vanishes identically for all values of the model parameters, and it invalidates the paper's main claim that the ChPT fluctuation surface is non-interacting.
[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (15)] The physical conclusion that N=0 means no phase transitions or long-range correlations relies on Ruppeiner's correspondence V_corr ~ R, which in the standard framework applies to the Hessian of the entropy with respect to extensive variables of an equilibrium ensemble and measures correlations only after a Gaussian fluctuation approximation. Here the metric is the Hessian of the topological susceptibility chi with respect to (m,M), which are not the natural fluctuation variables of the QCD ensemble, and chi is not a thermodynamic potential; no derivation, limiting argument, or numerical check is provided for this domain transfer. Therefore, even a correct algebraic identity N=0 would not establish that ChPT configurations are non-interacting; it would at most establish a property of the chosen model function chi(m,M).
[Sec. 3, Eqs. (24), (29), (30)] The derivative expressions are mutually inconsistent. Differentiating Eq. (22) gives chi_M = +b m^2/M, whereas Eq. (24) states chi_M = -b m^2/M^2; Eq. (29) gives chi_MM = -b m^2/M^2, which is the derivative of the correct chi_M but not of the printed chi_M; and Eq. (30) gives chi_mM = 2bm/M, which is consistent with the correct chi_M but not with the printed chi_M. Consequently, the flow equations chi_m=0=chi_M, the determinant Delta in Eq. (33), and the degeneration equation in Eq. (34) do not reliably follow from the stated derivatives, affecting the stability and phase-transition analysis of Section 3.
[Sec. 5, Eq. (79)] The simultaneous solution of the two flow equations dq/dt1=0 and dq/dt2=0 in Eq. (78) is not generally possible. Setting both derivatives to zero requires ln(t1-t2) = C1 C/(2k) from the first equation and ln(t1-t2) = -1/2 from the second, which are compatible only when C1 = -k/C. The branch h=exp(-1/2) in Eq. (79) imposes only dq/dt2=0 for generic k, and the branch h=exp(C C1/(2k)) is singular when k=0. Thus the critical values of (t1,t2) used to evaluate the second derivatives in Eq. (85) and to obtain the degenerate 0/0 conclusion are not established for the stated model inputs, including the choice C1=1 in Section 6.1.2.

minor comments (4)

[Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and grammatical errors, such as "it's" for "its", "Riemanian" for "Riemannian", and inconsistent capitalization in headings; a thorough editorial revision would be needed.
[Sec. 4, Eq. (55)] In the determinant matrix for N, the third row prints chi_{t1t2t2} twice; the lower-right entry should presumably be chi_{t2t2t2}, which is defined later in Eq. (56).
[Sec. 4, Eq. (67)] Eq. (67) writes a degree-eight equation with the sum running from i=0 to 8, but the coefficients n_i are only defined for i=0,...,7 in Eq. (64), and Eq. (66) shows a numerator of degree seven; the index range and the number of roots stated in the text should be reconciled.
[Sec. 6.1.2] The "numerical predictions" are qualitative plots of the model functions with no actual lattice data, error bars, or comparison to the JLQCD and ALPHA results cited in the text; the captions and text should clarify that these are illustrative evaluations, not data-driven fits.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the N=0 result is a direct (intended) derivative computation from the ChPT embedding, and the self-citations are applications, not load-bearing inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim that the ChPT configuration is a non-interacting statistical basis is obtained by computing the determinant N in Eq. (38) from derivatives of the ChPT susceptibility Eq. (1)/(22). This is a self-contained calculation: no parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction, and N=0 is not assumed. The identification of 'non-interacting statistical basis' with vanishing R (or N=0) is made in Section 2.3, but that only means the physical interpretation is definitional within the Ruppeiner framework; the algebraic content is a direct computation. The V_corr ~ R correspondence is imported from Ruppeiner's external theory (Ref. [45]) rather than from the author's own prior work; the many Tiwari/Bellucci citations are applications of the same framework and are not the source of the load-bearing relation. The slab analysis similarly computes invariants from the chosen model chi(t1,t2) and the solved q(t); its conclusions follow from the stated model, not from a hidden fit. One non-circular internal issue exists: the printed Eq. (39) gives chi_MMM = -2bm^2/M^3, and with that sign the determinant N in Eq. (38) does not vanish; the derivative should be +2bm^2/M^3, which makes row 3 proportional to row 2 and yields N=0. This is an arithmetic/sign error and a correctness concern, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation relies on the Ruppeiner correspondence as a domain assumption, on the nondegeneracy of the Hessian metric, and on the existence of a simultaneous solution to the slab flow equations. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced. The only hand-chosen numbers are the integration constants C1 and C2 in the slab two-point function.

free parameters (1)

C1, C2 integration constants = C1=1, C2=0 (chosen by hand)
In Section 5 and Section 6.1.2 the two-point function q(t) is integrated with arbitrary constants; the paper sets C1=1 and C2=0 for the plots, which affects the fluctuation quantities.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The scalar curvature R of the Hessian metric measures the correlation volume (V_corr ~ R) for any embedding function, including the topological susceptibility.
Eq.(15) is imported from Ruppeiner's thermodynamic fluctuation theory and applied to chi(m,M) and chi(t1,t2) without derivation or validation for this non-thermodynamic setting.
domain assumption The Hessian of chi defines a nondegenerate metric on the parameter space (det H != 0) wherever curvature is evaluated.
Eqs.(16-19) require det g != 0; the paper evaluates R at points where the determinant vanishes in Section 5, yielding a 0/0 form, so the geometric interpretation breaks down.
ad hoc to paper The two flow equations dq/dt1=0 and dq/dt2=0 in Section 5 have a common critical point.
Eqs.(78) imply ln(t1-t2)=-1/2 and ln(t1-t2)=C*C1/(2k), which are inconsistent unless C1=-k/C; the paper nonetheless assumes h=exp(-1/2) is the critical value.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Fluctuation Theory of Topological Susceptibility." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AJJO6UYI

@misc{pith2026190806018,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Fluctuation Theory of Topological Susceptibility},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AJJO6UYI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06018}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the long-range statistical correlations, whereby discuss the nature of the undermining interacting/ noninteracting domains and associated phase transitions under variations of the quark mass and the mass scale that corresponds to renormalized pion masses and the dimensions of an ensemble of slab sub-volumes of an arbitrary simulated lattice. The purpose of this paper is to compute the system's stability and its phase structures when it's model parameters vary infinitesimally. In particular, we focus on the stability properties and phases of an arbitrary (2+1) flavor QCD configuration under fluctuations of its parameters. In order to investigate the nature of statistical and systematic errors, and the presence of noises in the system, we explore fluctuation theory equivalences of the slab sub-volume method of computing the topological susceptibility with its low energy ChPT counterpart. Hereby, we find that the ChPT configurations always correspond to a non-interacting statistical basis in the space of the quark mass and the mass scale that corresponds to renormalized pion masses. The second system as an ensemble of finite slab sub-volumes of a simulated lattice turns out to be generically interacting under fluctuations of the slab dimensions. However, it yields an ill-defined degenerate system in the infinitesimal limit of slab parameters. It is worth mentioning that implications of the intrinsic geometric analysis are well suited towards the modeling based understanding of the gluonic topological charge density fluctuations, quark mass dependence and long auto-correlation of the global topology. Finally, we discuss the stability properties of sub-volume simulated lattice improvements towards the understanding of QCD vacua, the behavior of UV divergences, finite-volume effects, statistical precision, simultaneous measurements, and associated quantum channel measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06018 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The topological susceptibility χ(m, M) plotted as a function of the quark mass m on X-axis and the mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses on Y -axis, describing the nature of global topological interactions along the Z-axis by considering χ(m, M) as the embedding function of the fluctuation configuration under variations of m and M. Herewith, we observe that the mass scale M that corresponds to re… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses as a function of the quark mass m about the equilibrium defined by the flow equations plotted as a function of the quark mass m on X-axis and the mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses on Y -axis, describing the nature of global topological interactions by considering χ(m, M) as the embedding function of the fluctuation configuration un… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses as a function of the quark mass m about the equilibrium defined by the flow equations plotted as a function of the quark mass m on X-axis and the mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses on Y -axis, describing the nature of global topological interactions by considering χ(m, M) as the embedding function of the fluctuation configuration un… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (12 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The quark mass capacity χmm(m, M) plotted as a function of the quark mass m on X-axis and the mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses on Y -axis, describing the nature of local stability mediated via topological interactions along the Z-axis by consid…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The pion mass capacity χMM (m, M) plotted as a function of the quark mass m on X-axis and the mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses on Y -axis describing the nature of local stability mediated via topological interactions along the Z-axis by conside…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The parametric correlation χmM (m, M) plotted as a function of the quark mass m on X-axis and the mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses on Y -axis, describing the nature of local stability mediated via topological interactions along the Z-axis by co…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The determinant ∆(m, M) plotted as a function of the quark mass m on X-axis and the mass scale M that corresponds to renormalized pion masses on Y -axis, describing the nature of global stability mediated via the topological interactions along the Z-axis by considering…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The two point correlation function q1(t1, t2) plotted as a function of the slab dimensions {t1, t2} on X-axis and Y -axis respectively and the nature of the limiting q1 along the Z-axis by considering it as the embedding function of the parametric figuration under flu…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The two point correlation function q1(t1, t2) plotted as a function of the slab dimensions {t1, t2} on X-axis and Y -axis respectively and the nature of the limiting q1 along the Z-axis by considering it as the embedding function of the fluctuation configuration under…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The two point correlation function q2(t1, t2) plotted as a function of the slab dimensions {t1, t2} on X-axis and Y -axis respectively and the nature of the limiting q2 along the Z-axis by considering it as the embedding function of the parametric configuration under…

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: The two point correlation function q2(t1, t2) plotted as a function of the slab dimensions {t1, t2} on X-axis and Y -axis respectively and the nature of the limiting q2 along the Z-axis by considering it as the embedding function of the parametric configuration under…

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: The slab fluctuation capacity qii(t1, t2) plotted as a function of the slab dimensions {t1, t2} on X-axis and Y -axis respectively and qii along the Z-axis by considering q as the embedding function of the parametric configuration under fluctuations of t1 and t2 with …

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: The slab fluctuation capacity qii(t1, t2) plotted as a function of the slab dimensions {t1, t2} on X-axis and Y -axis respectively and qii along the Z-axis by considering q as the embedding function of the parametric configuration under fluctuations of t1 and t2 with …

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: The slab dimension correlation q12(t1, t2) plotted as a function of the slab dimensions {t1, t2} on X-axis and Y -axis respectively and q12 along the Z-axis by considering q as the embedding function of the parametric configuration under fluctuations of t1 and t2 with…

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: The slab dimension correlation q12(t1, t2) plotted as a function of the slab dimensions {t1, t2} on X-axis and Y -axis respectively and q12 along the Z-axis by considering q as the embedding function of the parametric configuration under fluctuations of t1 and t2 with…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

[1]

Staggered fermions and topological susceptibility in lattice QCD at = 5.7,

J. Smit, and J. C. Vink. “Staggered fermions and topological susceptibility in lattice QCD at = 5.7,” Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987): 433

1987
[2]

Topological susceptibility in lattice QCD with two ﬂavors of dynamical quarks

A. A. Khan, S. Aoki, R. Burkhalter, S. Ejiri, M. Fukugita, S. Hashimoto, N. Ishizuka, Y. Iwasaki, K. Kanaya, T. Kaneko, and Y. Kuramashi, “Topological susceptibility in lattice QCD with two ﬂavors of dynamical quarks”, Physical review D, 64(11), p.114501, 2001. 44

2001
[3]

Topological susceptibility in lattice QCD and perturbation theory

M. Bochicchio, G. C. Rossi, M. Testa, and K. Yoshida. “Topological susceptibility in lattice QCD and perturbation theory”, Physics Letters B 149, no. 6 487-491, 1984

1984
[4]

Exact chiral symmetry, topological charge and related topics

F. Niedermayer, “Exact chiral symmetry, topological charge and related topics.” Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements 73, no. 1-3, 105-119, 1999

1999
[5]

QCD at ﬁxed topology

R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, J. W. Negele, and U-J. Wiese, “QCD at ﬁxed topology”, Physics Letters B 560, no. 1-2, 64-74, 2003

2003
[6]

Topological susceptibility in full QCD at zero and ﬁnite temperature

B. Alles, D’Elia Massimo and A. Di Giacomo, “Topological susceptibility in full QCD at zero and ﬁnite temperature”, Physics Letters B 483, no. 1-3, 139-143, 2000

2000
[7]

Topological susceptibility in 2+1-ﬂavor QCD with chiral fermions

S. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, and T. Kaneko, “Topological susceptibility in 2+1-ﬂavor QCD with chiral fermions”, EPJ Web of Conferences 175, 04008 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817504008 arXiv:1712.05541 [hep-lat]]

arXiv 2018
[8]

Topological susceptibility in su (3) gauge theory

L. Del Debbio, L. Giusti, and C. Pica, “Topological susceptibility in su (3) gauge theory”, Physical review letters, 94(3), p.032003, 2005

2005

Show all 119 references

[9]

A new approach to the problem of dynamical quarks in numerical simulations of lattice QCD

M. Luscher, “A new approach to the problem of dynamical quarks in numerical simulations of lattice QCD”, Nuclear Physics B 418, no. 3, 637-648, 1994

1994
[10]

Lattice study of the conformal window in QCD-like theories

T. Appelquist, G. T. Fleming, and E. T. Neil, “Lattice study of the conformal window in QCD-like theories”, Physical review letters, 100(17), p.171607, 2008

2008
[11]

Topology and dynamics of the conﬁnement mechanism

A. S. Kronfeld, G. Schierholz, and U. J. Wiese, “Topology and dynamics of the conﬁnement mechanism”, Nuclear Physics B, 293, pp.461-478, 1987

1987
[12]

Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations

S. Schaefer, R. Sommer and F. Virotta [ALPHA Collaboration], “Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations”, Nucl. Phys. B 845, 93 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020 arXiv:1009.5228 [hep-lat]

2011 arXiv
[13]

Topological Susceptibility to the One-Loop Order in Chiral Perturbation Theory

Y.-Y. Mao, and T.-W. Chiu [TWQCD Collaboration], “Topological Susceptibility to the One-Loop Order in Chiral Perturbation Theory”, Phys. Rev. D 80, 034502 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.034502 arXiv:0903.2146 [hep-lat]

2009 arXiv
[14]

Chiral perturbation theory in a theta vacuum

S. Aoki, and H. Fukaya, “Chiral perturbation theory in a theta vacuum”, Phys. Rev. D 81, 034022 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.034022 arXiv:0906.4852 [hep-lat]

2010 arXiv
[15]

Cumulants of the QCD topological charge distribu- tion

F. K. Guo, and U. G. Meißner, “Cumulants of the QCD topological charge distribu- tion”, Phys. Lett. B 749, 278 (2015), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.076 arXiv:1506.05487 [hep-ph]

2015 arXiv
[16]

Λ MS from the static potential for QCD withnf = 2 dynamical quark ﬂavors:

K. Jansen, F. Karbstein, A. Nagy, and M. Wagner, “Λ MS from the static potential for QCD withnf = 2 dynamical quark ﬂavors:”,Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012(1), p.25, 2012

2012
[17]

Pion form factors in holographic QCD

H. J. Kwee, and R. F. Lebed, “Pion form factors in holographic QCD”, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008 (01), 027, 2008

2008
[18]

Witten, Private communication, 2019

E. Witten, Private communication, 2019. 45

2019
[19]

Foundations of quantum chromodynamics: an introduction to perturbative methods in gauge theories

T. Muta, “Foundations of quantum chromodynamics: an introduction to perturbative methods in gauge theories”, ISBN-13: 978-9812793546, World Scientiﬁc; 1998

1998
[20]

Riemannian geometry

M. P. do Carmo, “Riemannian geometry”, ASIN: B004JENPBY, Birkh¨ auser Boston (1992)

1992
[21]

Geometric Perspective of Entropy Function: Embedding, Spectrum and Convexity

B. N. Tiwari, “Geometric Perspective of Entropy Function: Embedding, Spectrum and Convexity”, (LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011), ISBN-13: 978-3-8454-3178-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.4654v2 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[22]

Thermodynamic Geometry: Evolution, Correlation and Phase Transition

S. Bellucci, and B. N. Tiwari, “Thermodynamic Geometry: Evolution, Correlation and Phase Transition”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 390 2074 (2011). e-print: arXiv:1010.5148v1 [stat-phys]

2011 arXiv
[23]

Quark mass and ﬂavour dependence of the QCD phase transition

F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and A. Peikert, “Quark mass and ﬂavour dependence of the QCD phase transition”, Nuclear Physics B, 605(1-3), pp.579-599, 2001

2001
[24]

Renormalization group invariance and optimal QCD renormalization scale-setting: a key issues review

X. G. Wu, Y. Ma, S. Q. Wang, H. B. Fu, H. H. Ma, S. J. Brodsky, and M. Mojaza, “Renormalization group invariance and optimal QCD renormalization scale-setting: a key issues review”, Reports on Progress in Physics, 78(12), p.126201, 2015

2015
[25]

Tanabashi et al

M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle Physics – Light Quarks (u, d, s), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018)

2018
[26]

Surface Tension of Fluids

B. Widom, “Surface Tension of Fluids”, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 2 (eds C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz), (Academic Press, 1972)

1972
[27]

Topological susceptibility in two-ﬂavor lattice QCD with exact chiral symmetry

S. Aoki, T. W. Chiu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. H. Hsieh, T. Kaneko, H. Matsufuru, J. Noaki, K. Ogawa, T. Onogi, and N. Yamada [JLQCD and TWQCD Collaborations], “Topological susceptibility in two-ﬂavor lattice QCD with exact chiral symmetry”, Phys. Lett. B 665, 294 (2008) arX...

2008 arXiv
[28]

Topological susceptibil- ity in (2+1)-ﬂavor lattice QCD with overlap fermion

T.W. Chiu, S. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, T.H. Hsieh, T. Kaneko, H. Matsufuru, J. Noaki, T. Onogi, and N. Yamada [JLQCD and TWQCD Collaborations], “Topological susceptibil- ity in (2+1)-ﬂavor lattice QCD with overlap fermion”, PoS LATTICE 2008, 072 (2008) arXiv:0810.0085 [hep-lat]

2008 arXiv
[29]

η′ meson mass from topological charge density correlator in QCD

H. Fukaya, S. Aoki, G. Cossu, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and J. Noaki [JLQCD Collabo- rations], “η′ meson mass from topological charge density correlator in QCD”, Phys. Rev. D 92, 111501 (2015)

2015
[30]

Chiral perturbation theory to one loop

J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, “Chiral perturbation theory to one loop”, Annals Phys. 158, 142 (1984). doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2

1984 doi
[31]

QCD and the chiral critical point

S. Gavin, A. Gocksch, and R. D. Pisarski, “QCD and the chiral critical point”, Phys. Rev. D 49, R3079(R) - Published 1 April 1994

1994
[32]

Event-by-event ﬂuctuations from decay of a Polyakov loop condensate

A. Dumitru and R. D. Pisarski “Event-by-event ﬂuctuations from decay of a Polyakov loop condensate”, Physics Letters B Volume 504, Issue 4, 19 April 2001, Pages 282-290

2001
[33]

Phase boundary for the chiral transition in (2+ 1)-ﬂavor QCD at small values of the chemical potential

Kaczmarek, Olaf, et al. “Phase boundary for the chiral transition in (2+ 1)-ﬂavor QCD at small values of the chemical potential.” Physical Review D 83.1 (2011): 014504. 46

2011
[34]

Quarkonium correlators and spectral functions at zero and ﬁnite tem- perature

A. Jakovac, et al. “Quarkonium correlators and spectral functions at zero and ﬁnite tem- perature.” Physical Review D 75.1 (2007): 014506

2007
[35]

Lattice QCD at high temperature and density

F. Karsch, “Lattice QCD at high temperature and density.” Lectures on quark matter. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. 209-249

2002
[36]

Where is the chiral critical point in three ﬂavor QCD?

Karsch, F. et al., “Where is the chiral critical point in three ﬂavor QCD?” Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 129 (2004) 614-616, hep-lat/0309116 BI-TP-2003-25, SWAT-03-379

2004 arXiv
[37]

Quark mass and the QCD transition

A. Mocsy, “Quark mass and the QCD transition”, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Volume 31, Number 6, 2005

2005
[38]

Quark mass eﬀects in quark number susceptibilities

G. Thorben, and P. Petreczky. “Quark mass eﬀects in quark number susceptibilities.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 832. No. 1. IOP Publishing, 2017

2017
[39]

Heavy quark free energies, potentials and the renormalized Polyakov loop

Kaczmarek, O. et al. “Heavy quark free energies, potentials and the renormalized Polyakov loop”, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 129 (2004) 560-562, hep-lat/0309121

2004 arXiv
[40]

Hadronic spectrum of the quark plasma

C. De Tar, and J. Kogut, “Hadronic spectrum of the quark plasma” Physical Review Letters, Physical Review Letters 59.4 (1987): 399

1987
[41]

Gluon quasiparticles and the Polyakov loop

P. N. Meisinger, M. C. Ogilvie, and T R. Miller, “Gluon quasiparticles and the Polyakov loop.” Physics Letters B 585.1-2 (2004): 149-154

2004
[42]

Conﬁnement versus chiral symmetry

A. Mocsy, F. Sannino, and K. Tuominen. “Conﬁnement versus chiral symmetry.” Physical review letters 92.18 (2004): 182302

2004
[43]

Chiral eﬀective model with the Polyakov loop

K. Fukushima, “Chiral eﬀective model with the Polyakov loop.” Physics Letters B 591.3-4 (2004): 277-284

2004
[44]

Application of the renormalization group to a second-order QCD phase tran- sition

F. Wilczek, “Application of the renormalization group to a second-order QCD phase tran- sition.” International Journal of Modern Physics A 7.16 (1992): 3911-3925

1992
[45]

Riemannian geometry in thermodynamic ﬂuctuation theory

G. Ruppeiner, “Riemannian geometry in thermodynamic ﬂuctuation theory”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 605-659 (1995), [Erratum, 313-313, 68, 1996]

1995
[46]

A Thermodynamic Geometric Study Of Complex Entropies: Statistical Fluctuations: Shannon, Renyi, Tsallis, Abe And Structural Conﬁgurations

B. N. Tiwari, V. Chandra, and S. Banerjee, “A Thermodynamic Geometric Study Of Complex Entropies: Statistical Fluctuations: Shannon, Renyi, Tsallis, Abe And Structural Conﬁgurations”, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN-13: 978-3845420691, 2011

2011
[47]

Preservation of a quantum R´ enyi relative entropy implies existence of a recovery map

A. Jencova, “Preservation of a quantum R´ enyi relative entropy implies existence of a recovery map”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 50(8), 085303 (2017)

2017
[48]

State-space Correlations and Stabilities

S. Bellucci, and B. N. Tiwari, “State-space Correlations and Stabilities”, Phys. Rev. D 82, 084008 (2010) arXiv:0910.5309v1 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[49]

Sur l´ es corrections de la g´ eom´ etrie thermodynamique des trous noirs

B. N. Tiwari, “Sur l´ es corrections de la g´ eom´ etrie thermodynamique des trous noirs”, ISBN: 978-613-1-53539-0, ´Editions Universitaires Europ´ eennes, 2011,arXiv:0801.4087v2 [hep-th]. 47

2011 arXiv
[50]

Geometrical methods for power network anal- ysis

S. Bellucci, B. N. Tiwari, and N. Gupta, “Geometrical methods for power network anal- ysis”, SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering, ISBN: 978-3-642-33343-9, 2013

2013
[51]

Intrinsic geometric analysis of the network reli- ability and voltage stability

N. Gupta, B. N. Tiwari, and S. Bellucci, “Intrinsic geometric analysis of the network reli- ability and voltage stability”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 44(1), 872-879 (2010)

2010
[52]

Randomized Cunningham Numbers in Cryptography: Randomization theory, Cryptanalysis, RSA cryptosystem, Primality test- ing, Cunningham numbers, Optimization theory

B. N. Tiwari, J. M. Adeegbe, and J. Kuipo Kibind´ e, “Randomized Cunningham Numbers in Cryptography: Randomization theory, Cryptanalysis, RSA cryptosystem, Primality test- ing, Cunningham numbers, Optimization theory”, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN-13: 978-6139858477, 2018

2018
[53]

Flat Information Geometries in Black Hole Thermodynamics

J. E. Aman, I. Bengtsson, and N. Pidokrajt, “Flat Information Geometries in Black Hole Thermodynamics”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 38, 1305-1315 (2006) arXiv:gr-qc/0601119v1

2006 arXiv
[54]

An Exact Fluctuating 1/2-BPS Conﬁguration

S. Bellucci, and B. N. Tiwari, “An Exact Fluctuating 1/2-BPS Conﬁguration”, JHEP 1005 023 (2010), arXiv:0910.5314v2 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[55]

System conﬁguration and combinatorial optimization

M. S. Levin, “System conﬁguration and combinatorial optimization”, In Modular System Design and Evaluation, 89-109 (2015), Springer, Cham

2015
[56]

Quantum versus classical annealing of Ising spin glasses

B. Heim, T. F. Rønnow, S. V. Isakov, and M. Troyer, “Quantum versus classical annealing of Ising spin glasses”, Science, 348(6231), 215-217 (2015)

2015
[57]

An inequality involving the gamma and digamma functions

F. Qi, and B. N. Guo, “An inequality involving the gamma and digamma functions”, Journal of Applied Analysis, 22(1), 49-54 (2016)

2016
[58]

Elements of Information Theory

T. M. Cover, and J. A. Thomas, “Elements of Information Theory”, 2nd ed. (Wiley- Interscience, 2006)

2006
[59]

Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Got- tingen

J. von Neumann, “Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Got- tingen”, Wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretischer Aufbau der Quantenmechanik, Mathematisch- Physikalische Klasse: 245-272 (1927), https://eudml.org/doc/59230

1927
[60]

Synergy, redundancy, and multi- variate information measures: an experimentalist’s perspective

N. Timme, W. Alford, B. Flecker, and J. M Beggs, “Synergy, redundancy, and multi- variate information measures: an experimentalist’s perspective”, Journal of computational neuroscience, 36(2), 119-140 (2014)

2014
[61]

HH42A digital thermometer is the most recent addition to a series of instruments based upon our high precision temperature measurement system technol- ogy

The OMEGA TM , “HH42A digital thermometer is the most recent addition to a series of instruments based upon our high precision temperature measurement system technol- ogy”, https://www.omega.com/temperature/pdf/HH42A.pdf (Last Accessed 05 September 2018)

2018
[62]

Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics

F. Weinhold, “Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics”, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 2479 (1975), DOI:10.1063/1.431689

1975 doi
[63]

Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics. II. Scaling, homo- geneity, and generalized GibbsDuhem relations

F. Weinhold, “Metric geometry of equilibrium thermodynamics. II. Scaling, homo- geneity, and generalized GibbsDuhem relations”, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 2484 (1975), doi/10.1063/1.431635. 48

1975 doi
[64]

Thermodynamic critical ﬂuctuation theory?

G. Ruppeiner, “Thermodynamic critical ﬂuctuation theory?”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 287-290 (1983)

1983
[65]

Thermodynamics: A Riemannian geometric model

G. Ruppeiner, “Thermodynamics: A Riemannian geometric model”, Phys. Rev. A 20, 1608-1613 (1979)

1979
[66]

New thermodynamic ﬂuctuation theory using path integrals

G. Ruppeiner, “New thermodynamic ﬂuctuation theory using path integrals”, Phys. Rev. A 27, 1116-1133 (1983)

1983
[67]

Fluid phases: Going supercritical

P. F. McMillan, and H. E. Stanley, “Fluid phases: Going supercritical”, Nature Physics 6, 479 (2010)

2010
[68]

The Widom line as the crossover between liquid-like and gas-like behaviour in supercritical ﬂuids

G. G. Simeoni, T. Bryk, F. A. Gorelli, M. Krisch, G. Ruocco, M. Santoro, and T. Scopigno, “The Widom line as the crossover between liquid-like and gas-like behaviour in supercritical ﬂuids”, Nature Physics 6, 503 (2010)

2010
[69]

Mobius fermions: Improved domain wall chiral fermions

R. C. Brower, H. Neﬀ, and K. Orginos, “Mobius fermions: Improved domain wall chiral fermions”, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 140, 686 (2005), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.180 [hep-lat/0409118]; arXiv:1206.5214 [hep-lat]

2005 arXiv
[70]

Large-scale simulations with chiral symmetry

T. Kaneko, S. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, and J. Noaki [JLQCD Collab- oration], “Large-scale simulations with chiral symmetry” PoS LATTICE 2013, 125 (2014) [arXiv:1311.6941 [hep-lat]]

2014 arXiv
[71]

Fine lattice simulations with chirally symmetric fermions

J. Noaki, H. Fukaya, T. Kaneko, G. Cossu, S. Hashimoto and S. Aoki [JLQCD Collabo- ration], “Fine lattice simulations with chirally symmetric fermions”, PoS LATTICE 2013, 263 (2014)

2014
[72]

JLQCD IroIro++ lattice code on BG/Q

G. Cossu, J. Noaki, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, H. Fukaya, P. A. Boyle, and J. Doi, “JLQCD IroIro++ lattice code on BG/Q”, arXiv:1311.0084 [hep-lat] , URL : http : //suchix.kek.jp/guidocossu/documents/DoxyGen/html/index.html

arXiv
[73]

QCD at Fixed Topology

R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, J. W. Negele, and U. J. Wiese, “QCD at Fixed Topology”, Phys. Lett. B 560, 64 (2003), arXiv:hep-lat/0302005, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00369-1

2003 arXiv
[74]

Finite volume QCD at ﬁxed topological charge

S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, and T. Onogi, “Finite volume QCD at ﬁxed topological charge”, Phys. Rev. D 76, 054508 (2007), arXiv:0707.0396 [hep-lat]

2007 arXiv
[75]

Topological Susceptibility from Slabs

W. Bietenholz, P. de Forcrand, and U. Gerber, “Topological Susceptibility from Slabs”, JHEP 1512, 070 (2015), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)070 arXiv:1509.06433 [hep-lat]

2015 arXiv
[76]

The Slab Method to Measure the Topological Susceptibility

W. Bietenholz, K. Cichy, P. de Forcrand, A. Dromard, and U. Gerber, “The Slab Method to Measure the Topological Susceptibility”, PoS LATTICE 2016, 321 (2016) arXiv:1610.00685 [hep-lat]

2016 arXiv
[77]

Topological Susceptibility under Gradient Flow

H. Meja-Daz, W. Bietenholz, P. de Forcrand, U. Gerber, and I. O. Sandoval, “Topological Susceptibility under Gradient Flow”, arXiv:1712.01395[hep-lat]

arXiv
[78]

Screening of the topological charge in a correlated instanton vacuum

E. V. Shuryak, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, “Screening of the topological charge in a correlated instanton vacuum”, Phys. Rev. D 52, 295 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.295 hep-lat/9409020. 49

1995 arXiv
[79]

Local topological and chiral properties of QCD

P. de Forcrand, M. Garcia Perez, J. E. Hetrick, E. Laermann, J. F. Lagae, and I. O. Stamatescu, “Local topological and chiral properties of QCD”, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 73, 578 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(99)85143-3 hep-lat/9810033

1999 arXiv
[80]

A Geometric Approach to Correlations and Quark Number Susceptibilities

S. Bellucci, V. Chandra, and B. N. Tiwari, “A Geometric Approach to Correlations and Quark Number Susceptibilities”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2 Vol. 27, No. 10 (2012) 1250055. e-print: arXiv:1010.4405 [hep-th], doi.org/10.1142/S0217732312500551

2012 arXiv
[81]

Thermodynamic Stability of Quarkoniumn Bound States

S. Bellucci, V. Chandra, and B. N. Tiwari, “Thermodynamic Stability of Quarkoniumn Bound States”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A26 (2011) 2665-2724. e-print: arXiv:1010.4225v1 [hep- th], doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X11053511

2011 arXiv
[82]

Thermodynamic Geometry and Free Energy of Hot QCD

S. Bellucci, V. Chandra, and B. N. Tiwari, “Thermodynamic Geometry and Free Energy of Hot QCD”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 43-70. e-print: arXiv:0812.3792v1 [hep-th], doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X11051172

2011 arXiv
[83]

Properties and uses of the Wilson ﬂow in lattice QCD

M. L¨ uscher, “Properties and uses of the Wilson ﬂow in lattice QCD”, JHEP 1008, 071 (2010) [Erratum-ibid. 1403, 092 (2014)] arXiv:1006.4518 [heplat]

2010 arXiv
[84]

Perturbative analysis of the gradient ﬂow in non-abelian gauge theories

M. L¨ uscher, and P. Weisz, “Perturbative analysis of the gradient ﬂow in non-abelian gauge theories”, JHEP 1102, 051 (2011) arXiv:1101.0963 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[85]

Comparison of the gradient ﬂow with cooling in SU (3) pure gauge theory

C. Bonati and M. DElia, “ Comparison of the gradient ﬂow with cooling in SU (3) pure gauge theory”, Phys. Rev. D 89, no. 10, 105005 (2014) arXiv:1401.2441 [hep-lat]

2014 arXiv
[86]

High-precision scale setting in lattice QCD

S. Borsanyi, S. Durr, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, T. Kurth, L. Lellouch, T. Lippert, C. McNeile, and K. K. Szabo, “High-precision scale setting in lattice QCD”, JHEP 1209, 010 (2012) arXiv:1203.4469 [hep-lat]

2012 arXiv
[87]

Axial U (1) symmetry at ﬁnite temperature with M¨ obius domain-wall fermions

S. Hashimoto, S. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, T. Kaneko, J. Noaki, and P. A. Boyle, “Axial U (1) symmetry at ﬁnite temperature with M¨ obius domain-wall fermions”, PoS LATTICE 2013, 431 (2014)

2014
[88]

Review of Particle Physics

W-M Yao et. al 2006, “Review of Particle Physics”, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 33, 1

2006
[89]

Decay constants and spectroscopy of mesons in lattice QCD using domain-wall fermions

B. Fahy, G. Cossu, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, J. Noaki, and M. Tomii [JLQCD Collab- oration], “Decay constants and spectroscopy of mesons in lattice QCD using domain-wall fermions”, PoS LATTICE 2015, 074 (2016) [arXiv:1512.08599 [hep-lat]]

2016 arXiv
[90]

Topological suscepti- bility and the sampling of ﬁeld space in Nf = 2 lattice QCD simulations

M. Bruno, S. Schaefer, and R. Sommer [ALPHA Collaboration], “ Topological suscepti- bility and the sampling of ﬁeld space in Nf = 2 lattice QCD simulations”, JHEP 1408, 150 (2014), doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)150 arXiv:1406.5363 [hep-lat]

2014 arXiv
[91]

The Pion Mass Formula

R. T. Cahill and S. M. Gunner, “The Pion Mass Formula”, Australian journal of physics 51.3 (1998): 509-525. arxiv/hep-ph/9602240v2

1998 arXiv
[92]

A new mass formula for NG bosons in QCD

R. T. Cahill, and S. M. Gunner. “A new mass formula for NG bosons in QCD.” Modern Physics Letters A 10.39 (1995): 3051-3058

1995
[93]

R., and Craig D

Frank, M. R., and Craig D. Roberts. ”Model gluon propagator and pion and -meson observables.” Physical Review C 53.1 (1996): 390. 50

1996
[94]

The quark condensate in the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation

K. Langfeld, and C. Kettner. “The quark condensate in the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation.” Modern Physics Letters A 11.16 (1996): 1331-1337

1996
[95]

Behavior of current divergences underSU (3)× SU (3)

M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner. “Behavior of current divergences underSU (3)× SU (3).” Murray Gell-Mann: Selected Papers. 2010. 160-164

2010
[96]

Hadron properties from QCD sum rules

L. J. Reinders, S. Yazaki, and H. R. Rubinstein. “Hadron properties from QCD sum rules.” Phys. Rep. 127.CERN-TH-4079 (1984): 1-97

1984
[97]

QCD Spectral Sum Rules

S. Narison, “QCD Spectral Sum Rules”, World Scientiﬁc Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 26, Singapore 1989

1989
[98]

Light quark masses in QCD

J. Bijnens,P. Joaquim, and E. de Rafael. “Light quark masses in QCD.” Physics Letters B 348.1-2 (1995): 226-238

1995
[99]

Dyson-Schwinger equations and their application to hadronic physics

C. D. Roberts, and A. G. Williams. “Dyson-Schwinger equations and their application to hadronic physics.” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 33 (1994): 477-575

1994
[100]

Soliton bag models of hadrons from QCD

R. T. Cahill, and . D. Roberts. “Soliton bag models of hadrons from QCD.” Physical Review D 32.9 (1985): 2419

1985
[101]

Goldstone theorem and diquark conﬁne- ment beyond rainbow-ladder approximation

A. Bender, C. D. Roberts, and L. V. Smekal. “Goldstone theorem and diquark conﬁne- ment beyond rainbow-ladder approximation.” Physics Letters B 380.1-2 (1996): 7-12

1996
[102]

Chiral perturbation theory: expansions in the mass of the strange quark

J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler. “Chiral perturbation theory: expansions in the mass of the strange quark.” Nuclear Physics B 250.1-4 (1985): 465-516

1985
[103]

Low-energy QCD: Chiral coeﬃcients and the quark- quark interaction

M. R. Frank, and T.s Meissner. “Low-energy QCD: Chiral coeﬃcients and the quark- quark interaction.” Physical Review C 53.5 (1996): 2410

1996
[104]

The NambuJona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics

S. P. Klevansky, “The NambuJona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics.” Reviews of Modern Physics 64.3 (1992): 649

1992
[105]

Cloudy bag model of the nucleon

A. W. Thomas, S. Theberge, and G. A. Miller. “Cloudy bag model of the nucleon.” Physical Review D 24.1 (1981): 216

1981
[106]

A possible quark mechanism for the saturation of nuclear matter

P. A M. Guichon, “A possible quark mechanism for the saturation of nuclear matter.” Physics Letters B 200.3 (1988): 235-240

1988
[107]

Conﬁning quark condensate model of the nucleon

M. R. Frank, and P. C. Tandy. “Conﬁning quark condensate model of the nucleon.” Physical Review C 46.1 (1992): 338

1992
[108]

Dynamical chiral-symmetry breaking

K. Higashijima, “Dynamical chiral-symmetry breaking.” Physical Review D 29.6 (1984): 1228

1984
[109]

Nonperturbative enhancement of current quark masses and underlying strong- coupling dynamics in QCD

V. Elias, “Nonperturbative enhancement of current quark masses and underlying strong- coupling dynamics in QCD.” Canadian journal of physics 71.7-8 (1993): 347-350

1993
[110]

Quark and gluon propagators from meson data

R.T. Cahill, and S. M. Gunner. “Quark and gluon propagators from meson data.” Physics Letters B 359.3-4 (1995): 281-287. 51

1995
[111]

Lattice calculation of coordinate-space vector and axial-vector current cor- relators in QCD

M. Tomii, G. Cossu, B. Fahy, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and J. Noaki (JLQCD collaboration), “Lattice calculation of coordinate-space vector and axial-vector current cor- relators in QCD”, Phys. Rev. D 96, 054511 (2017) arXiv:1703.06249 [hep-lat]

2017 arXiv
[112]

TWQCD’s dynamical DWF project

T.-W. Chiu, T.-S. Guu, T.-H. Hsieh, C.-H. Huang, Y.-Y. Lee, Y.-Y. Mao, K. Ogawa, and P.-K. Tseng (TWQCD Collaboration), “TWQCD’s dynamical DWF project”, PoS LAT2009:034,2009 arXiv:0911.5029 [hep-lat]

2009 arXiv
[113]

The determination of αs by the ALPHA collab- oration

M. Bruno, M. D. Brida, P. Fritzsch, T. Korzec, A. Ramos, S. Schaefer, H. Simma, S. Sint, and R. Sommer (ALPHA collaboration), “The determination of αs by the ALPHA collab- oration” DESY 16-214, CERN-TH-2016-236, IFT-UAM/CSIC-16-119 arXiv:1611.05750 [hep-lat]

2016 arXiv
[114]

Stochastic calculation of the Dirac spectrum on the lattice and a determination of chiral condensate in 2+1-ﬂavor QCD

G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and J. I. Noaki, “Stochastic calculation of the Dirac spectrum on the lattice and a determination of chiral condensate in 2+1-ﬂavor QCD”, PTEP 2016, no. 9, 093B06 (2016) doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw129 [arXiv:1607.01099 [hep- lat]]

2016 arXiv
[115]

Review on Composite Higgs Models

O. Witzel, “Review on Composite Higgs Models”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08216, 2019

1901 arXiv
[116]

Probing the Electroweak Sector and QCD with the ATLAS Detector

Y. Wu, “Probing the Electroweak Sector and QCD with the ATLAS Detector” (No. ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2018-734). ATL-COM-PHYS-2018-968, 2018

2018
[117]

The QCD running coupling

A. Deur, S. J. Brodsky, and G. F.de T´ eramond, “The QCD running coupling”, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 90, pp.1-74, 2016

2016
[118]

A Mini-Introduction To Information Theory

E. Witten, “A Mini-Introduction To Information Theory”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1805.11965v4 [hep-th] (2018)

2018 arXiv
[119]

APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum ﬁeld theory

E. Witten, “APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum ﬁeld theory.” Reviews of Modern Physics 90.4 (2018): 045003. 52

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Staggered fermions and topological susceptibility in lattice QCD at = 5.7,

J. Smit, and J. C. Vink. “Staggered fermions and topological susceptibility in lattice QCD at = 5.7,” Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987): 433

1987

[2] [2]

Topological susceptibility in lattice QCD with two ﬂavors of dynamical quarks

A. A. Khan, S. Aoki, R. Burkhalter, S. Ejiri, M. Fukugita, S. Hashimoto, N. Ishizuka, Y. Iwasaki, K. Kanaya, T. Kaneko, and Y. Kuramashi, “Topological susceptibility in lattice QCD with two ﬂavors of dynamical quarks”, Physical review D, 64(11), p.114501, 2001. 44

2001

[3] [3]

Topological susceptibility in lattice QCD and perturbation theory

M. Bochicchio, G. C. Rossi, M. Testa, and K. Yoshida. “Topological susceptibility in lattice QCD and perturbation theory”, Physics Letters B 149, no. 6 487-491, 1984

1984

[4] [4]

Exact chiral symmetry, topological charge and related topics

F. Niedermayer, “Exact chiral symmetry, topological charge and related topics.” Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements 73, no. 1-3, 105-119, 1999

1999

[5] [5]

QCD at ﬁxed topology

R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, J. W. Negele, and U-J. Wiese, “QCD at ﬁxed topology”, Physics Letters B 560, no. 1-2, 64-74, 2003

2003

[6] [6]

Topological susceptibility in full QCD at zero and ﬁnite temperature

B. Alles, D’Elia Massimo and A. Di Giacomo, “Topological susceptibility in full QCD at zero and ﬁnite temperature”, Physics Letters B 483, no. 1-3, 139-143, 2000

2000

[7] [7]

Topological susceptibility in 2+1-ﬂavor QCD with chiral fermions

S. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, and T. Kaneko, “Topological susceptibility in 2+1-ﬂavor QCD with chiral fermions”, EPJ Web of Conferences 175, 04008 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817504008 arXiv:1712.05541 [hep-lat]]

arXiv 2018

[8] [8]

Topological susceptibility in su (3) gauge theory

L. Del Debbio, L. Giusti, and C. Pica, “Topological susceptibility in su (3) gauge theory”, Physical review letters, 94(3), p.032003, 2005

2005