On the optimal calibration of VVV photometry

Eva K. Grebel; Gergely Hajdu; Istv\'an D\'ek\'any; M\'arcio Catelan

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

On the optimal calibration of VVV photometry

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The VVV survey's near-infrared magnitudes carry crowding-dependent zero-point biases that a per-chip recalibration removes.

desk verdict A solid diagnostic paper that convincingly identifies 2MASS blending and H-band nonlinearity as VVV zero-point biases, but overstates how fully the corrections eliminate them. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06160 v2 pith:JMPM6HPY submitted 2019-08-16 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

Gergely Hajdu , István Dékány , Márcio Catelan , Eva K. Grebel This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

keywords photometriccalibrationVISTAVVVsurvey2MASSnear-infraredphotometryzeropointscrowdedstellarfieldsvariablestarlightcurves

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the standard calibration of the VVV survey's near-infrared photometry is biased in two previously unrecognized ways. In crowded fields, the 2MASS stars used as calibration standards are often unresolved blends, so the survey's zero points drift as the telescope moves between dense and sparse regions. Separately, the H-band detector responds nonlinearly on two of VIRCAM's sixteen chips when the sky background is high. The paper supplies per-chip correction factors for every observation and shows that applying them tightens variable-star light curves by roughly an order of magnitude and shifts mean magnitudes by up to about 0.1 mag. If this is right, many published results that use VVV absolute magnitudes or colors, especially extinction-law and distance studies toward the bulge, would need revision.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the per-chip zero-point correction: for each pawprint, each VIRCAM detector, and each of the five smallest photometric apertures, the correction is the median difference between VVV magnitudes and converted 2MASS magnitudes of matched stars, restricted to stars fainter than the nonlinearity limit and to a 0.15-arcsecond match radius. The switch from a pawprint-wide mean to a per-chip median is what separates the two biases, because the chip-level view isolates the detector 5 and 6 nonlinearity while the tight match radius suppresses standards that are blends in the 2MASS catalog. These offsets are subtracted frame-by-frame from the original pipeline magnitudes, with a parallel set computed on the version 1.5 scale.

What would settle it

In one dense VVV tile, recompute the per-chip offsets using only 2MASS standards whose VISTA images show no companion within about an arcsecond, and compare with the values in Table 1; a systematic difference that grows with 2MASS source separation would show the blend rejection is incomplete. An independent check would be to calibrate the same pawprints with PSF photometry tied to an absolute system and see whether the reported 0.1-mag shifts persist.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the VVV survey's J, H, and K_S magnitudes carry time-varying zero-point biases that are large enough to distort scientific conclusions, and that both sources can be traced and mostly removed. The first source is H-band: on two of VIRCAM's sixteen detector chips, high sky background drives the detector into a nonlinear response, making measured magnitudes too faint and adding scatter. The second source is the calibration reference itself, because the 2MASS stars used as standards are often unresolved blends in crowded bulge fields, so a pawprint-level zero point computed as a mean against those standards is pulled faint and changes as the telescope points to regions of different density. The paper shows that replacing the pawprint-level mean with per-chip median offsets, using a tight 0.15-arcsecond cross-match radius and the version 1.5 2MASS-to-VISTA conversion, largely eliminates both biases. Demonstrated on Cepheid light curves, the correction reduces scatter by roughly an order of magnitude and shifts mean K_S magnitudes by about 0.1 mag in dense tiles. On this basis the paper supplies a table of per-observation, per-chip, per-aperture correction factors as a temporary fix and recommends permanent pipeline changes.

Load-bearing premise

The whole correction scheme assumes the converted 2MASS catalog is an unbiased absolute reference; if 2MASS standards remain blended after the 0.15-arcsecond cut, or if the color and extinction conversions that translate them to the VISTA system are wrong, the correction factors inherit that bias.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Published studies that use VVV absolute magnitudes, colors, or extinction estimates in crowded regions may need to be re-derived with the corrected zero points.
Variable-star light curves from VVV lose a major source of epoch-to-epoch and chip-to-chip scatter once the corrections are applied, making classification and period-luminosity work cleaner.
Other VISTA surveys sharing the same calibration pipeline are exposed to the same two biases, so the diagnostic method and corrections have reach beyond VVV.
The standard pipeline itself can be improved by moving to per-detector zero points, stricter cross-matching, and rejection of blended standard stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the zero-point bias scales with crowding, then spatial maps of the correction factor trace the density and extinction structure of the bulge; this raises the possibility that some reported spatial variations in the near-infrared extinction law are partly calibration artifacts.
A testable extension would be to rebuild the standard-star list from a higher-resolution, blend-free catalog and recompute the corrections; exact agreement with the supplied table would confirm that the 0.15-arcsecond cut is sufficient.
For time-series science, the dominant benefit is probably the removal of per-epoch chip offsets rather than the absolute shift, which suggests that an internal self-calibration using repeated observations of sparse and dense tiles could preserve or extend the gain without any external standard catalog.
The corrections only cover the J, H, and K_S pawprint photometry; extending the same per-chip logic to tile photometry and to the Z and Y bands would be a natural next step before applying the method to the full multi-band VVV data set.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper gives the first convincing account of two distinct zero-point problems in VVV/VISTA photometry: 2MASS standard-star blending in crowded bulge fields, and an H-band nonlinearity on two VIRCAM chips under high sky background. Both are demonstrated with direct image comparisons and magnitude-difference maps. The per-chip, per-aperture correction scheme is sensible, and the improvement in Cepheid light-curve scatter (Fig. 9) is real. If those corrections are applied, the survey's JHKs photometry should be on a more consistent zero-point scale, which matters for hundreds of bulge/disk studies.

The soft spots are mostly about validation. The scatter reduction validates removal of per-frame offsets; it does not independently confirm the absolute zero point of the corrected photometry in dense fields. The correction chain relies on 2MASS (after conversion to the VISTA system) being an unbiased reference, yet Sect. 8 concedes that a considerable fraction of blended stars remains in some fields. That residual blending propagates into the median offsets. The paper's own Fig. 8 shows blending effects become non-marginal above 0.1 arcsec, so the adopted 0.15 arcsec cross-match is a compromise. In the most crowded tiles (e.g., b307), the residuals are largest exactly where the correction is most needed. So the abstract's "largely eliminated" is too strong; "substantially reduced" would be accurate. Also, the full correction table is only in journal supplementary material, not the preprint, which limits immediate use.

None of this undermines the central diagnostic claim. The evidence for the biases is solid, and the corrections are a reasonable interim fix. What's missing is an absolute check in dense fields independent of converted 2MASS standards — e.g., comparison with PSF photometry calibrated to a single global zero point, or closure with other surveys.

Who benefits: anyone working with VVV photometry, especially extinction-law and distance work, and variable-star studies. The paper deserves serious peer review. I'd accept it with revisions: temper the abstract, quantify residual blending bias, add an independent absolute check, and make the table and code available in the arXiv version.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies two independent sources of photometric zero-point bias in VVV VISTA data: (1) H-band measurements on VIRCAM chips 5 and 6 are affected by detector nonlinearity under high sky background, producing per-chip magnitude offsets; and (2) the standard CASU calibration, which uses blended 2MASS sources as standards in crowded fields, introduces a crowding-dependent bias in the derived zero points. The authors propose a revised calibration that computes per-chip, per-pawprint zero-point corrections from median offsets between VVV aperture photometry and 2MASS magnitudes converted to the VISTA v1.5 system, using a 0.15 arcsec cross-match radius to reduce blending contamination. They supply the correction table (Table 1) and demonstrate that applying the corrections reduces the scatter of Cepheid light curves and produces spatially coherent correction maps. The paper also recommends future improvements, including discarding H-band data taken under high sky background and using PSF-based calibration.

Significance. If the calibration scheme is correct, it offers a practical way to improve the accuracy and internal consistency of a widely used near-infrared survey, with consequences for extinction-law studies, variable-star classification, and distance determinations. The paper's strength is the clear diagnosis of the bias mechanism using direct image comparisons and positional-separation statistics, and the public provision of machine-readable correction factors. The improvement in light-curve scatter is convincingly demonstrated. However, the absolute zero-point accuracy in crowded fields is not independently validated, and the paper itself acknowledges residual blending contamination; hence the central claim of 'largely eliminated' biases needs qualification or additional evidence.

major comments (3)

[Section 6, Fig. 8, and Sect. 8] The correction factors in Table 1 are derived as the median VISTA-2MASS difference using a 0.15 arcsec cross-match radius. Fig. 8 shows that the blending bias becomes non-marginal for separations >0.1 arcsec, and Sect. 8 concedes that a considerable fraction of blended stars remains in some fields. In crowded tiles such as b307, the correction factors therefore inherit the same blending bias they are intended to remove, so the absolute zero point of the corrected photometry is not established exactly where the correction matters most. The scatter reduction in Fig. 9 validates the removal of per-frame and per-chip offsets, but is expected by construction and is not an independent absolute check. Please provide an absolute test in dense fields using a reference independent of the converted 2MASS catalog, such as PSF photometry calibrated to another system or comparisons with other surveys, or explicitly restrict the central claim to relative, time-varying biases.
[Section 3, footnote 2] The authors state that in converting 2MASS magnitudes to the VISTA v1.5 system they inadvertently used the modified E'(B-V) extinction values (Bonifacio et al. 2000) instead of the unmodified Schlegel values, introducing a zero-point error of up to 0.007 mag in Ks. Because this systematic error enters the absolute reference used to compute all correction factors, it should be corrected or at least quantified as a function of position and included in the reported uncertainties; otherwise the claim of eliminating zero-point biases to high precision is not fully justified.
[Section 8 and Abstract] The abstract claims that the identified errors 'can be effectively eliminated' by the revised calibration, but the body of the paper includes substantial qualifications: H-band data under high sky background should generally be discarded, the cross-match selection still leaves blended stars in the calibration sample, and the correction table is described as a 'temporary measure'. These limitations are in tension with the strong wording of the central claim. I recommend softening the claim to 'significantly reduced' and providing an explicit statement of the residual absolute zero-point uncertainty in crowded fields.

minor comments (6)

[Section 4] The phrase 'It has to be noted that similar offsets...' is informal; consider rephrasing to 'No similar offsets were found in the J and Ks bands' and provide the relevant figure reference.
[Table 1 caption] The notation 'Aperturec' and 'σtot.d' is unclear; please spell out the columns and explain in the caption that the formal error of each offset is σ_tot divided by the square root of the number of stars.
[Section 6, bullet list] The bullet point 'only observations fainter than this limit are used' is confusing because the preceding sentence states nonlinearity affects observations 'down to 12.5 magnitudes'; clarify that the calibration uses stars fainter than 12.5 mag, i.e., with magnitude values larger than 12.5.
[Section 7] The sentence 'In is worth noting that due to the offset between the magnitude scales between the two systems...' contains a typo ('In' should be 'It') and the wording is convoluted; please clarify the sentence.
[Section 8] The word 'challanged' should be 'challenged'.
[Fig. 2 label] The color-bar label 'HCASU AP 3 - H2MASS, VISTA' mixes notation; use a clearer expression such as 'H_CASU - H_2MASS (VISTA-converted)'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the zero-point revision is anchored to external 2MASS standards, and the residual blending and scatter-validation caveats are consistency/correctness issues rather than circular derivations.

full rationale

The derivation chain proceeds from converted 2MASS magnitudes (an external catalog, converted with published color equations from Gonzalez-Fernandez et al. 2018) to per-chip median offsets (Sect. 6) and then to corrected VVV photometry. The identification of the H-band nonlinearity (Sect. 4) and the crowding bias (Sect. 5) is made by comparing VVV photometry to this external reference, so the central claims do not reduce to the paper's own inputs. The Sect. 7 demonstration that Cepheid light-curve scatter decreases after correction is partly a consistency check, because the correction factors are median offsets for the same frames and chips, so removing them will naturally reduce frame-to-frame scatter; however, the paper does not use this as the only support, and it also invokes an external consistency check with Matsunaga et al. (2016). The Sect. 8 concession that a considerable fraction of blended 2MASS stars remains in some fields is a correctness risk in the absolute zero points of the densest tiles, not a circularity. Self-citations to Hajdu et al. (2018), Dekany et al. (2018), and Dekany et al. (2019) provide source catalogs, light-curve models, and Cepheid identifications, but they are not load-bearing for the calibration argument itself. No equation defines the target result in terms of itself, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. At most, there is a minor self-citation and a non-independent consistency demonstration, neither of which undermines the external-reference basis of the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a small set of external reference assumptions: 2MASS photometric accuracy, the 2MASS-to-VISTA color transformation, the Schlegel extinction corrections, and the unbiasedness of the median offset estimator. The procedural choices, 0.15 arcsec match radius and the 12.5 mag limit, are tuned using data from the same survey they correct, which is a mild circularity in calibration validation, though the reference frame itself is external.

free parameters (2)

Cross-match radius between VVV and converted 2MASS catalogs = 0.15 arcsec
Chosen based on the KDE analysis in Fig. 8 to minimize the blending bias, which becomes significant beyond 0.1 arcsec, while retaining enough calibrator stars in lower-density tiles (Sect. 6).
Lower magnitude limit for calibrator stars = 12.5 mag
Adopted to avoid VIRCAM nonlinearity that biases H-band measurements down to 12.5 mag (Sect. 6, referencing the middle panel of Fig. 5). The cut affects all bands and is not independently justified for J and Ks.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The 2MASS Point Source Catalog provides accurate absolute JHKs photometry across the VVV footprint.
Used as the reference standard throughout Sects. 3-6; if 2MASS itself is biased in crowded regions, the derived corrections inherit that bias.
domain assumption The 2MASS-to-VISTA color conversion equations (Gonzalez-Fernandez et al. 2018, Eqs. 4-6) and the Schlegel et al. (1998) extinction corrections correctly transform 2MASS magnitudes to the VISTA v1.5 system.
Invoked in Sect. 3 to build the converted reference catalog; the paper acknowledges a version 1.3/1.5 extinction handling difference and an inadvertent use of E'(B-V) in the v1.5 conversion, with a maximum quoted effect of 0.007 mag in Ks.
domain assumption The median VVV-minus-2MASS magnitude difference for stars matched within 0.15 arcsec is an unbiased estimator of the per-chip zero-point offset.
Core of the Sect. 6 method; biased if blended 2MASS stars remain in the sample or if the magnitude distribution of calibrators changes systematically.
domain assumption VIRCAM chip response is stable within a pawprint apart from the identified H-band nonlinearity, so a single per-chip offset per observation is sufficient.
Assumed by the per-chip correction scheme in Sect. 6; the maps in Figs. 10-11 suggest residual small-scale structure, such as 2MASS scan artifacts, not fully corrected.
domain assumption The Schlegel et al. (1998) extinction map and the per-star dereddening procedure are accurate enough for zero-point work in the crowded bulge.
Used to convert 2MASS colors; the paper notes that the v1.3 extinction handling is less robust and that extinction differences can contribute to the observed offsets (Sect. 5).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the optimal calibration of VVV photometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JMPM6HPY

@misc{pith2026190806160,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the optimal calibration of VVV photometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JMPM6HPY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06160}
}

abstract

Prompted by some inconsistencies in the photometry of the VISTA Variables in the V\'ia L\'actea (VVV) survey, we conduct a revision of the standard calibration procedure of VISTA data in the $J$, $H$, and $K_S$ passbands. Two independent sources of bias in the photometric zero-points are identified: First, high sky backgrounds severely affect the $H$-band measurements, but this can mostly be minimized by strict data vetting. Secondly, during the zero-point calibration, stars serving as standards are taken from the 2MASS catalog, which can suffer from high degrees of blending in regions of high stellar density, affecting both the absolute photometric calibration, as well as the scatter of repeated observations. The former affects studies that rely on an absolute magnitude scale, while the latter can also affect the shapes and amount of scatter in the VVV light curves, thus potentially hampering their proper classification. We show that these errors can be effectively eliminated by relatively simple modifications of the standard calibration procedure, and demonstrate the effect of the recalibration on the VVV survey's data quality. We give recommendations for future improvements of the pipeline calibration of VISTA photometry, while also providing preliminary corrections to the VVV $JHK_\mathrm{S}$ observations as a temporary measure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Into the Darkness: Classical and Type II Cepheids in the Zona Galactica Incognita
astro-ph.SR 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

A near-infrared census of the hidden far side of the Milky Way disk yields over 1,000 new classical and type II Cepheids, new extinction measurements, and tracers of the warp and age structure of the disk.
Hot water emission during an outburst on a classical T Tauri star
astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

V557 Mon, a classical T Tauri star, underwent a year-long EXor outburst during which transient hot water vapor emission traced an inner disk cooling from about 3000 K to 2000 K.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Alonso-Garc´ ıa, J., D´ ek´ any, I., Catelan, M., et al.: Variable Stars in the VVV Globular Clusters. I. 2MASS-GC 02 and Terzan 10. The Astronomical Jour- nal 149, 99 (2015) Alonso-Garc´ ıa, J., Saito, R. K., Hempel, M., et al.: Milky Way demographics with the VVV survey. IV. PSF photometry from almost one billion stars in the Galactic bulge and adjacent...

work page 2015
[2]

C.: A Search for Stars of Very Low Metal Abundance

Bonifacio, P., Monai, S., Beers, T. C.: A Search for Stars of Very Low Metal Abundance. V. Photoelectric UBV Photometry of Metal-weak Candidates from the Northern HK Survey. The Astronomical Journal 120, 2065–2081 (2000)

work page 2000
[3]

Astronomy & Astrophysics 532, A131 (2011)

Borissova, J., Bonatto, C., Kurtev, R., et al.: New Galactic star clusters dis- covered in the VVV survey. Astronomy & Astrophysics 532, A131 (2011)

work page 2011
[4]

New type II Cepheids from VVV data towards the Galactic center

Braga, V. F., Contreras Ramos, R., Minniti, D., et al.: New type II Cepheids from VVV data towards the Galactic center. arXiv:1904.12024 (2019)

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[5]

Astronomy & Astrophysics 467, 777–784 (2007) Chen´ e, A.-N., Borissova, J., Clarke, J

Casali, M., Adamson, A., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al.: The UKIRT wide-ﬁeld camera. Astronomy & Astrophysics 467, 777–784 (2007) Chen´ e, A.-N., Borissova, J., Clarke, J. R. A., et al.: Massive open star clusters using the VVV survey. I. Presentation of the data and description of the approach. Astronomy & Astrophysics 545, A54 (2012)

work page 2007
[6]

Cross, N. J. G., Collins, R. S., Mann, R. G., et al.: The VISTA Science Archive. 548, A119 (2012) Contreras Ramos, R., Minniti, D., Gran, F., et al.: The VVV Survey RR Lyrae Population in the Galactic Center Region. The Astrophysical Journal 863, 79 (2018) D´ ek´ any, I., Minniti, D., Catelan, M., et al.: VVV Survey Near-infrared Pho- tometry of Known Bul...

work page 2012
[7]

P., Irwin, M

Emerson, J. P., Irwin, M. J., Lewis, J., et al.: VISTA data ﬂow system: overview. Proceedings of SPIE 5493, 401 (2004)

work page 2004
[8]

A., Rejkuba, M., Zoccali, M., et al.: Reddening and metallicity maps of the Milky Way bulge from VVV and 2MASS

Gonzalez, O. A., Rejkuba, M., Zoccali, M., et al.: Reddening and metallicity maps of the Milky Way bulge from VVV and 2MASS. II. The complete high resolution extinction map and implications for Galactic bulge studies. Astronomy & Astrophysics 543, A13. (2012) Gonz´ alez-Fern´ andez, C., Hodgkin, S. T., Irwin, M. J., et al.: The VISTA ZYJHKs photometric sy...

work page 2012

Show all 22 references

[9]

K., Jurcsik, J.: A Data-driven Study of RR Lyrae Near-IR Light Curves: Principal Component Analysis, Robust Fits, and Metallicity Estimates

Hajdu, G., D´ ek´ any, I., Catelan, M., Grebel, E. K., Jurcsik, J.: A Data-driven Study of RR Lyrae Near-IR Light Curves: Principal Component Analysis, Robust Fits, and Metallicity Estimates. The Astrophysical Journal 857, 55 (2018)

2018
[10]

T., Irwin, M

Hodgkin, S. T., Irwin, M. J., Hewett, P. C., Warren, S. J.: The UKIRT wide ﬁeld camera ZYJHK photometric system: calibration from 2MASS. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 394, 675–692 (2009)

2009
[11]

J., Lewis, J., Hodgkin, S., et al.: VISTA data ﬂow system: pipeline processing for WFCAM and VISTA

Irwin, M. J., Lewis, J., Hodgkin, S., et al.: VISTA data ﬂow system: pipeline processing for WFCAM and VISTA. Proceedings of SPIE 5493, 411–422 (2004)

2004
[12]

A., Schlaﬂy, E., Finkbeiner, D., et al.: The Pan-STARRS 1 Pho- tometric Reference Ladder, Release 12.01

Magnier, E. A., Schlaﬂy, E., Finkbeiner, D., et al.: The Pan-STARRS 1 Pho- tometric Reference Ladder, Release 12.01. The Astrophysical Journal Sup- plement 205, 20 (2013)

2013
[13]

W., Emerson, J

Minniti, D., Lucas, P. W., Emerson, J. P., et al.: VISTA Variables in the V´ ıa L´ actea (VVV): The public ESO near-IR variability survey of the Milky Way. New Astronomy 15, 433–443 (2010)

2010
[14]

2018, The Vatican Observatory, Castel Gandolfo: 80th Anniversary Celebration, 51, 63

Minniti, D. 2018, The Vatican Observatory, Castel Gandolfo: 80th Anniversary Celebration, 51, 63

2018
[15]

W., Bono, G., et al.: A lack of classical Cepheids in the inner part of the Galactic disc, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 462, 414 (2016)

Matsunaga, N., Feast, M. W., Bono, G., et al.: A lack of classical Cepheids in the inner part of the Galactic disc, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 462, 414 (2016)

2016
[16]

M., Gonzalez, O

Nataf, D. M., Gonzalez, O. A., Casagrande, L., et al.: Interstellar extinction curve variations towards the inner Milky Way: a challenge to observational cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456, 2692– 2706 (2016)

2016
[17]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475, 4208–4222 (2018) Schlaﬂy, E

Jurcsik, J., Hajdu, G., D´ ek´ any, I., et al., Blazhko modulation in the infrared. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475, 4208–4222 (2018) Schlaﬂy, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., Juri´ c, M., et al.: Photometric Calibration of the First 1.5 Years of the Pan-STARRS1...

2018
[18]

J., Finkbeiner, D

Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Davis, M.: Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds. The Astrophysical Journal 500, 525–553 (1998)

1998
[19]

Q., Jiang, B

Schultheis, M., Chen, B. Q., Jiang, B. W., et al.: Mapping the Milky Way bulge at high resolution: the 3D dust extinction, CO, and X factor maps. Astronomy & Astrophysics 566, A120 (2014)

2014
[20]

F., Cutri, R

Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al.: The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). The Astronomical Journal 131, 1163–1183 (2006)

2006
[21]

Astronomy & Astrophysics 575, A25 (2015)

Sutherland, W., Emerson, J., Dalton, G., et al.: The Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA): Design, technical overview, and performance. Astronomy & Astrophysics 575, A25 (2015)

2015
[22]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 435, 1874–1887 (2013)

Wegg, C., & Gerhard, O.: Mapping the three-dimensional density of the Galac- tic bulge with VVV red clump stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 435, 1874–1887 (2013)

2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Alonso-Garc´ ıa, J., D´ ek´ any, I., Catelan, M., et al.: Variable Stars in the VVV Globular Clusters. I. 2MASS-GC 02 and Terzan 10. The Astronomical Jour- nal 149, 99 (2015) Alonso-Garc´ ıa, J., Saito, R. K., Hempel, M., et al.: Milky Way demographics with the VVV survey. IV. PSF photometry from almost one billion stars in the Galactic bulge and adjacent...

work page 2015

[2] [2]

C.: A Search for Stars of Very Low Metal Abundance

Bonifacio, P., Monai, S., Beers, T. C.: A Search for Stars of Very Low Metal Abundance. V. Photoelectric UBV Photometry of Metal-weak Candidates from the Northern HK Survey. The Astronomical Journal 120, 2065–2081 (2000)

work page 2000

[3] [3]

Astronomy & Astrophysics 532, A131 (2011)

Borissova, J., Bonatto, C., Kurtev, R., et al.: New Galactic star clusters dis- covered in the VVV survey. Astronomy & Astrophysics 532, A131 (2011)

work page 2011

[4] [4]

New type II Cepheids from VVV data towards the Galactic center

Braga, V. F., Contreras Ramos, R., Minniti, D., et al.: New type II Cepheids from VVV data towards the Galactic center. arXiv:1904.12024 (2019)

work page Pith review arXiv 2019

[5] [5]

Astronomy & Astrophysics 467, 777–784 (2007) Chen´ e, A.-N., Borissova, J., Clarke, J

Casali, M., Adamson, A., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al.: The UKIRT wide-ﬁeld camera. Astronomy & Astrophysics 467, 777–784 (2007) Chen´ e, A.-N., Borissova, J., Clarke, J. R. A., et al.: Massive open star clusters using the VVV survey. I. Presentation of the data and description of the approach. Astronomy & Astrophysics 545, A54 (2012)

work page 2007

[6] [6]

Cross, N. J. G., Collins, R. S., Mann, R. G., et al.: The VISTA Science Archive. 548, A119 (2012) Contreras Ramos, R., Minniti, D., Gran, F., et al.: The VVV Survey RR Lyrae Population in the Galactic Center Region. The Astrophysical Journal 863, 79 (2018) D´ ek´ any, I., Minniti, D., Catelan, M., et al.: VVV Survey Near-infrared Pho- tometry of Known Bul...

work page 2012

[7] [7]

P., Irwin, M

Emerson, J. P., Irwin, M. J., Lewis, J., et al.: VISTA data ﬂow system: overview. Proceedings of SPIE 5493, 401 (2004)

work page 2004

[8] [8]

A., Rejkuba, M., Zoccali, M., et al.: Reddening and metallicity maps of the Milky Way bulge from VVV and 2MASS

Gonzalez, O. A., Rejkuba, M., Zoccali, M., et al.: Reddening and metallicity maps of the Milky Way bulge from VVV and 2MASS. II. The complete high resolution extinction map and implications for Galactic bulge studies. Astronomy & Astrophysics 543, A13. (2012) Gonz´ alez-Fern´ andez, C., Hodgkin, S. T., Irwin, M. J., et al.: The VISTA ZYJHKs photometric sy...

work page 2012