Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 33 references

Nanostructure engineering of epitaxial piezoelectric {\alpha}-quartz thin films on silicon

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first large-scale ordered arrays of epitaxial piezoelectric quartz nanopillars directly on silicon, with features down to 50 nm.

desk verdict A solid nanofabrication paper with convincing structural evidence, but the quantitative piezoelectric claim on the nanopillars is not actually calibrated. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07016 v1 pith:ZE42TIMH submitted 2019-08-19 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords quartzsiliconepitaxialgrowththinfilmspiezoelectricitynanostructurationchemicalsolutiondeposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that epitaxial piezoelectric quartz thin films on silicon can be nanostructured at wafer scale without sacrificing the properties that make quartz useful. It combines a soft-chemistry growth route with three maskless lithographic techniques to produce ordered arrays of α-quartz nanopillars with diameters down to 50 nm and heights up to 2 μm. The authors claim crystallinity, epitaxial orientation, and piezoelectric response are all preserved after patterning. If correct, this would remove the bulk-crystal thickness floor that currently limits quartz resonators and would open a route to higher-frequency, silicon-integrated piezoelectric devices.

What carries the argument

The enabling object is the epitaxial α-quartz thin film grown on silicon by soft chemistry: a Sr-doped mesoporous SiO2 sol-gel film is dip-coated and devitrified at 1000 °C to give (100)-textured quartz epitaxially aligned with the silicon substrate. On that film, three top-down routes transfer patterns: laser interference lithography, which exposes a photoresist with an interference pattern before CHF3/O2 reactive-ion etching; soft nanoimprint lithography, in which a PDMS mold replicated from a silicon master imprints the sol-gel film before crystallization; and SrCO3 nanoparticles that self-assemble on the film surface during crystallization and act as etch-resistant nanomasks. Multilayer dip-coating with consolidation steps controls pillar height; the SrCO3 route reaches the smallest diameters, down to 60 nm, with no mask at all.

What would settle it

Apply the same PFM protocol to a non-piezoelectric, topographically identical control pillar; if its amplitude matches the quartz nanopillar's amplitude, the piezoelectric signal is an artifact rather than a material property.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports, for the first time, large-scale ordered arrays of epitaxial piezoelectric α-quartz nanostructures on silicon. Using laser interference lithography, soft nanoimprint lithography, and self-assembled SrCO3 nanoparticle nanomasks on chemically grown epitaxial quartz films, the authors obtain vertical nanopillars with diameters down to 50 nm and heights up to 2 μm. X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy show that the (100) α-quartz || (100) Si epitaxial relationship and crystalline texture survive etching and crystallization, and PFM measurements give a d33 on nanopillars comparable to bulk quartz. The central claim is that quartz-based piezoelectric micro- and nanostructures can therefore be integrated directly on silicon, in contrast to the usual approach of micromachining or hybrid mounting bulk quartz crystals.

Load-bearing premise

The preservation of piezoelectricity in nanopillars is inferred from PFM amplitude measured on top of high-aspect-ratio structures, where topographic and electrostatic artifacts can distort the true d33; the direct piezoelectric method was applied only to dense films because the force breaks the columns.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nanostructured quartz can be produced by three complementary routes, so feature size can be selected by route: 400–800 nm pillars up to 1 µm by laser interference lithography, 2 µm tall pillars by nanoimprint, and 60 nm conical pillars by SrCO3 nanomask etching.
  • Because the (100) α-quartz || (100) Si epitaxy is retained after patterning, the patterned films keep the crystalline texture expected for resonator-grade quartz.
  • Pillar height is set by the number of deposited sol-gel layers, giving a simple knob for tuning device thickness without changing materials.
  • The piezoelectric coefficient of nanostructured films remains the same order as bulk quartz, so the increased surface area of pillars can be used for sensing without losing piezoelectric response.
  • These arrays are a concrete step toward high-frequency resonators and sensors monolithically integrated on silicon, the application the paper identifies for Gigahertz telecommunication.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A device-level test not performed here is to measure the mechanical quality factor of a resonator made from the nanopillar array; the paper establishes piezoelectric response, but the GHz-resonator promise depends on mechanical loss as well.
  • The nanopillar d33 claim could be hardened by measuring the same geometry on a non-piezoelectric control; the paper cites known topographic crosstalk but does not report such a control at the nanoscale.
  • Since pillar diameter in the SrCO3 route is set by the nanoparticle mask, reducing the mask size distribution should push features below 50 nm without additional lithography.
  • The same sol-gel epitaxy plus maskless patterning sequence may transfer to other epitaxial piezoelectric oxides on silicon where bulk micromachining is impractical.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the monolithic integration of sub-micron epitaxial α-quartz nanostructures on (100) silicon substrates obtained by combining chemical-solution deposition of Sr-doped mesoporous silica films with three maskless patterning routes: laser interference lithography, soft nanoimprint lithography, and reactive etching through self-assembled SrCO3 nanoparticle nanomasks. The authors claim large-scale ordered arrays of quartz nanopillars with diameters down to 50 nm and heights up to 2 µm, and assert that the crystallinity, (100) texture, epitaxial relationship, and piezoelectricity of the quartz are preserved after nanostructuring. The structural preservation is documented by θ-2θ X-ray diffraction, pole figures, rocking curves, transmission electron microscopy, and electron diffraction of individual pillars; the piezoelectric functionality is probed by resonant piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) on nanopillars and by direct piezoelectric force microscopy (DPFM) on dense films, with bulk quartz values and a periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) reference used for comparison.

Significance. If validated, the results would constitute a meaningful advance: they would demonstrate, for the first time to the authors' knowledge, epitaxial quartz films on silicon patterned at the sub-micron scale by scalable, maskless methods, with structural evidence of high quality (atomic-resolution Z-contrast imaging of the quartz/Si interface, electron diffraction of single pillars, and pole-figure-confirmed epitaxial texture). Such structures are directly relevant to high-frequency acoustic resonators and sensing devices. Credit is due for the thoroughness of the structural characterization, the explicit acknowledgment of topographic crosstalk in the PFM images, and the use of a PPLN reference in the DPFM measurements. The main weakness is that the quantitative piezoelectric claim on the nanopillars rests on resonant-PFM data whose calibration chain is not documented, and the manuscript currently overstates the degree to which the direct DPFM technique validates the nanostructured samples.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.1, §4.2, Fig. 2c] The quantitative claim d33(PFM) = 2±0.5 pm/V for the 800 nm nanocolumns is not supported by the calibration information given in the manuscript. The PFM measurements were performed at contact resonance (~80 kHz), where the measured amplitude is amplified by the cantilever quality factor, yet the manuscript does not report the inverse optical lever sensitivity, the cantilever spring constant, the contact-resonance Q-factor, or a PFM calibration on a reference sample measured under the same resonant conditions with the same tip; the PPLN reference described in Fig. S3 is used for the DPFM channel only. In addition, the figure cited for the pillar measurement (Fig. 2c) is captioned as a DPFM spectroscopic measurement on an 800 nm thick quartz film, so the PFM-on-nanopillar data that support d33(PFM) are not actually displayed. Because the abstract and the conclusions assert that piezoelectricity is preserved as a central result, the authors should either provide a properly calibrated resonant-PFM analysis (e.g., Q-factor and amplitude calibration from the resonance curve, or an off-resonance or dual-frequency resonance-tracking protocol with a PPLN reference) or downgrade the quantitative d33 value to a qualitative electromechanical-response statement.
  2. [§3 Conclusion; SI Fig. S2] The conclusion states that 'We used two techniques, DPFM and PFM, to quantify the piezoelectric coefficient d33 of nanostructured and dense quartz films,' but the Supporting Information (Fig. S2) explicitly states that DPFM cannot be applied to the nanostructured films because the applied force breaks the quartz nanocolumns, so DPFM was performed only on dense films. The comparison of d33(PFM) = 2±0.5 pm/V on pillars with d33(DPFM) = 4±2 pC/N on a dense film is therefore a cross-technique, cross-sample comparison; for the NIL pillars (Section 2.2), the evidence is a qualitative increase of resonant PFM amplitude with applied AC bias (Fig. 5b) with no numerical d33 reported. The text should state precisely which technique was applied to which sample geometry and acknowledge the resulting uncertainty in the pillar d33.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract, §2.3, §3] The minimum pillar diameter is stated as 50 nm in the abstract and conclusions but as 60 nm in Section 2.3; the reported range should be made consistent.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The text cites Fig. 2c for the PFM measurement on nanocolumns, whereas the caption identifies Fig. 2c as a DPFM measurement on a dense 800 nm film; the caption also lists an (e) panel that is not described in the text, so the panel lettering and in-text cross-references need to be corrected.
  3. [§2.1, throughout] The quantity reported as 'd33' for (100)-oriented α-quartz should be identified as an effective longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient, because α-quartz (point group 32) has no tabulated d33 in the conventional tensor notation, only coefficients such as d11 and d14.
  4. [Introduction, third paragraph] The sentence beginning 'few works have shown sub-micron patterned quartz surfaces' is incomplete and should be reworded for clarity.
  5. [§4.2] The Experimental Section should document how the raw PFM lock-in amplitude is converted to d33, including optical-lever sensitivity calibration, contact-resonance Q-factor, and the applied-field geometry, so that the reported d33(PFM) value is reproducible.
  6. [SI Fig. S2] The validation of the combined PFM/DPFM approach is cited for BiFeO3 epitaxial thin films, a different material system measured on dense films; the relevance of that validation to resonant PFM on high-aspect-ratio quartz pillars should be argued explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper reports experimental fabrication and characterization; self-citations are methodological support, not reductions.

full rationale

This paper does not present a derivation chain with fitted parameters or predictive equations; it reports experimental fabrication of epitaxial quartz nanopillars and their structural and piezoelectric characterization. The central structural claims (crystallinity, epitaxial relationship, morphology) are established by independent XRD, TEM, electron diffraction, and SEM measurements, none of which are constructed from the claimed outcomes. The piezoelectric claim is supported by PFM on nanopillars and DPFM on dense films, with a commercial PPLN sample used as a reference, as stated in Section 4.2 and the Conclusion. The Supporting Information (Fig. S2) explicitly notes a limitation: DPFM cannot be applied to nanostructured quartz films because the force breaks the columns, and the authors cite their own prior BiFeO3 work to argue that combined PFM/DPFM validates the approach. This is a measurement-validation concern and a correctness risk, not a circularity: the PFM signal is not defined in terms of the claimed d33, no d33 value is fitted and then repredicted, and the cited prior work is an independent, falsifiable experimental result. Self-citations to the group's earlier epitaxial quartz growth method (ref. 10a) and DPFM method (ref. 15) are methodological references, not load-bearing reductions of the present claims to their own inputs. No equation or construction in the paper makes any prediction equivalent to its input. Therefore the circularity score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the established epitaxial quartz growth method, standard characterization assumptions, and the interpretation of PFM on nanostructures. There are no invented physical entities; the SrCO3 particles are observed and used as masks. The process parameters are chosen by hand from prior experience and are critical for the outcome, so they are listed as free parameters.

free parameters (3)
  • Sr/SiO2 molar ratio = 0.05
    Chosen to achieve both epitaxial crystallization and outcropping of SrCO3 nanomasks; critical for both growth and nanomask patterning.
  • Dip-coating withdrawal speed = 300 mm/min
    Determines film thickness; critical for achieving continuous nanostructured quartz layers and successful nanoimprint.
  • Crystallization annealing = 1000 °C for 5 h
    Thermal treatment used to crystallize the Sr-doped silica into epitaxial alpha-quartz; inherited from prior work.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Epitaxial alpha-quartz can be grown on Si(100) by chemical solution deposition with Sr2+ as a catalyst.
    Inherited from the authors' prior work (ref 10a); the present paper uses this as the starting point.
  • standard math XRD, TEM, and electron diffraction are valid probes of crystallinity and epitaxial orientation.
    Standard characterization assumptions; not independently proven here.
  • domain assumption PFM signal on the nanopillar tops represents true piezoelectric deformation.
    The paper acknowledges topographic crosstalk but assumes the top signal is free of artifact; this is load-bearing for the piezoelectricity-preserved claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nanostructure engineering of epitaxial piezoelectric {\alpha}-quartz thin films on silicon." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZE42TIMH

@misc{pith2026190807016,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nanostructure engineering of epitaxial piezoelectric \alpha-quartz thin films on silicon},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZE42TIMH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07016}
}
read the original abstract

The monolithic integration of sub-micron quartz structures on silicon substrates is a key issue for the future development of telecommunication to the GHz frequencies. Here we report unprecedented large-scale fabrication of ordered arrays of piezoelectric epitaxial quartz nanostructures on silicon substrates by the combination of soft-chemistry and three cost effective lithographic techniques: (i) laser transfer lithography, (ii) soft nanoimprint lithography on Sr-doped SiO2 sol-gel thin films and (iii) self-assembled SrCO3 nanoparticles reactive nanomasks. Epitaxial {\alpha}-quartz nanopillars with different diameters (down to 50 nm) and heights (up to 2000 nm) were obtained for the first time. This work proves the control over the shape, micro- and nano-patterning of quartz thin films while preserving its crystallinity, texture and piezoelectricity. This work opens up the opportunity to fabricate new high frequency resonators and high sensitivity sensors relevant in different fields of application.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07016 by the authors.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Piezoelectric response of epitaxial nanostructured quartz films using NIL lithographic process. (a) PFM amplitude and topography (inset) recorded simultaneously while applying a tip￾substrate AC voltage of 10 V, showing area similar tip vibration level at the background film and top nanostructures. Point-out spectroscopy measurements recorded on top of the structures and bottom film, for different applied AC bias. (… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Benoit Charlot, Dr

    Rudy Desgarceaux, Pau Escofet-Majoral, Dr. Benoit Charlot, Dr. Adrian Carretero-Genevrier Institut d’Electronique et des Systemes (IES), CNRS, Université de Montpellier, 860 Rue de Saint Priest 34095 Montpellier, France

  2. [3]

    Guilliem Larrieu LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INP, 7 av. Colonel Roche, 31031Toulouse, France γ These authors contributed equally to this work E-mail: carretero@ies.univ-montp2.fr, Keywords: Quartz, silicon, epitaxial growth, thin films, piezoelectricity, nanostructuration Abstract The monolithic integration of sub-micron quartz structures on ...

  3. [4]

    Piezoelectric materials are elements of motion sensors (accelerometers and gyr oscopes), oscillators and resonators present in practically any single electronic circuit

    Introduction. Piezoelectric materials are elements of motion sensors (accelerometers and gyr oscopes), oscillators and resonators present in practically any single electronic circuit . As a result, the piezoelectric materials solves many technological challenges including high frequency and stable oscillators, reducing energy consumption of devices and in...

  4. [5]

    Such procedures do not require any lithographic mask and allow obtaining a large scale and precise control of epitaxial quartz nanostructures (see Fig

    Results and discussions To produce nanoscaled 1D (arrays of pillars) on epitaxial α -quartz thin films by silicon micromachining, we have tested cost efficient lithographic techniques such as laser transfer lithography technique 12, Soft nanoimprint lithography 13 and a novel plasma -assisted self - assembled SrCO 3 nanoparticles reactive nanomask etching...

  5. [6]

    Conclusion The combination of top-down and bottom -up methodologies enabled the nanostructuration of piezoelectric quartz films, epitaxially grown on (100) -silicon substrates. We have used scalable lithographic methodologies that do not require masks to generate highly ordered 1D quartz patterns consisting of vertical quartz nanocolumn s with diameters a...

  6. [7]

    Laboratori o de Microscopías Avanzadas-Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón

    Experimental Section 4.1.Synthesis Solution preparation: All the chemicals were from Sigma -Aldrich and without any further purification. In a typical process, we first prepared Solution A by adding 0.7 g Brij -58 into 23.26 g absolute ethanol, then 1.5 g HCl (37%), 4.22 g tetraethyl orthosil icate (TEOS) and stirring the solution for at least 4 h and not...

  7. [8]

    Vila-Fungueiriño, J. M.; Bachelet, R.; Saint-Girons, G.; Gendry, M.; Gich, M.; Gazquez, J.; Ferain, E.; Rivadulla, F.; Rodriguez-Carvajal, J.; Mestres, N.; Carretero-Genevrier, A., Integration of functional complex oxide nanomaterials on silicon. Frontiers in Physics 2015, 3

  8. [9]

    G., Nanoelectromechanical Systems

    (a) Craighead, H. G., Nanoelectromechanical Systems. Science 2000, 290 (5496), 1532-1535; (b) Ramesh, R.; Schlom, D. G., Orienting Ferroelectric Films. Science 2002, 296 (5575), 1975-1976; (c) Warusawithana, M. P.; Cen, C.; Sleasman, C. R.; Woicik, J. C.; Li, Y.; Kourkoutis, L. F.; Klug, J. A.; Li, H.; Ryan, P.; Wang, L.-P.; Bedzyk, M.; Muller, D. A.; Che...

Show all 33 references
  1. [10]

    E., Introduction to quartz crystal unit design (Van Nostrand Reinhold electrical/computer science and engineering series)

    Bottom, V. E., Introduction to quartz crystal unit design (Van Nostrand Reinhold electrical/computer science and engineering series). Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1982

  2. [11]

    Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 1995, 48 (1), 1-21; (b) Sauerbrey, G., Verwendung Von Schwingquarzen Zur Wagung Dunner Schichten Und Zur Mikrowagung

    (a) Benes, E.; Gröschl, M.; Burger, W.; Schmid, M., Sensors based on piezoelectric resonators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 1995, 48 (1), 1-21; (b) Sauerbrey, G., Verwendung Von Schwingquarzen Zur Wagung Dunner Schichten Und Zur Mikrowagung. 1959; Vol. 155, p 206-222

  3. [12]

    2015; Vol

    Galliou, S.; Goryachev, M.; Abbe, P.; Vacheret, X.; Tobar, M.; Bourquin, R., Quality Factor Measurements of Various Types of Quartz Crystal Resonators Operating Near 4 K. 2015; Vol. 63, p 1-1

  4. [13]

    S.; Delapierre, G., Quartz: a material for microdevices

    Danel, J. S.; Delapierre, G., Quartz: a material for microdevices. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 1991, 1 (4), 187

  5. [14]

    d.; Charlot, B.; Pedaci, F

    Santybayeva, Z.; Meghit, A.; Desgarceaux, R.; Teissier, R.; Pichot, F.; Marin, C. d.; Charlot, B.; Pedaci, F. In Fabrication of quartz microcylinders by laser interference lithography for angular optical tweezers, SPIE: 2016; p 5

  6. [15]

    M., Vivek Venkataraman, Marko Lončar, Mechanical and optical nanodevices in single-crystal quartz

    Young-Ik Sohn, R. M., Vivek Venkataraman, Marko Lončar, Mechanical and optical nanodevices in single-crystal quartz. arXiv.org > cond-mat > 2017

  7. [16]

    I.; Bernal, M

    Lu, H.; Sadani, B.; Courjal, N.; Ulliac, G.; Smith, N.; Stenger, V.; Collet, M.; Baida, F. I.; Bernal, M. P., Enhanced electro-optical lithium niobate photonic crystal wire waveguide on a smart-cut thin film. Opt. Express 2012, 20 (3), 2974-2981

  8. [17]

    L.; Boissiere, C.; Grosso, D.; Rodriguez-Carvajal, J.; Sanchez, C., Soft-Chemistry-Based Routes to Epitaxial alpha-Quartz Thin Films with Tunable Textures

    (a) Carretero-Genevrier, A.; Gich, M.; Picas, L.; Gazquez, J.; Drisko, G. L.; Boissiere, C.; Grosso, D.; Rodriguez-Carvajal, J.; Sanchez, C., Soft-Chemistry-Based Routes to Epitaxial alpha-Quartz Thin Films with Tunable Textures. Science 2013, 340 (6134), 827-831; (b) Au - Car...

  9. [18]

    J.; Clem, P

    Brinker, C. J.; Clem, P. G., Quartz on Silicon. Science 2013, 340 (6134), 818-819

  10. [19]

    Seo, J.-H.; Park, J.; Kim, S.-I.; Ju Park, B.; Ma, Z.; Choi, J.; Ju, B.-K., Nanopatterning by Laser Interference Lithography: Applications to Optical Devices. 2015

  11. [20]

    AIP Advances 2017, 7 (12), 125125

    Hamouda, F.; Bryche, J.-F.; Aassime, A.; Maillart, E.; Gâté, V.; Zanettini, S.; Ruscica, J.; Turover, D.; Bartenlian, B., Soft nanoimprint lithography on SiO2 sol-gel to elaborate sensitive substrates for SERS detection. AIP Advances 2017, 7 (12), 125125

  12. [21]

    E., in Properties of materials: Anisotropy, Symmetry, Structure (Oxford University Press

    Newnham, R. E., in Properties of materials: Anisotropy, Symmetry, Structure (Oxford University Press. 2005

  13. [22]

    Nature Communications 2017, 8 (1), 1113

    Gomez, A.; Gich, M.; Carretero-Genevrier, A.; Puig, T.; Obradors, X., Piezo-generated charge mapping revealed through direct piezoelectric force microscopy. Nature Communications 2017, 8 (1), 1113

  14. [23]

    In Dynamics of Curved Fronts, Pelcé, P., Ed

    Landau, L.; Levich, B., Dragging of a Liquid by a Moving Plate. In Dynamics of Curved Fronts, Pelcé, P., Ed. Academic Press: San Diego, 1988; pp 141-153

  15. [24]

    A.; Kuemmel, M.; Grosso, D., Preparation of Sol−Gel Films by Dip-Coating in Extreme Conditions

    Faustini, M.; Louis, B.; Albouy, P. A.; Kuemmel, M.; Grosso, D., Preparation of Sol−Gel Films by Dip-Coating in Extreme Conditions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2010, 114 (17), 7637-7645

  16. [25]

    Current Applied Physics 2017, 17 (5), 661-674

    Seol, D.; Kim, B.; Kim, Y., Non-piezoelectric effects in piezoresponse force microscopy. Current Applied Physics 2017, 17 (5), 661-674

  17. [26]

    Drisko, G. L.; Carretero-Genevrier, A.; Gich, M.; Gazquez, J.; Ferrah, D.; Grosso, D.; Boissiere, C.; Rodriguez-Carvajal, J.; Sanchez, C., Water-Induced Phase Separation Forming Macrostructured Epitaxial Quartz Films on Silicon. Advanced Functional Materials 2014, 24 (35), 5494-5502

  18. [27]

    2012; Vol

    Faustini, M.; Drisko, G.; Letailleur, A.; Salas Montiel, R.; Boissiere, C.; Cattoni, A.; Haghiri-Gosnet, A.-M.; Lerondel, G.; Grosso, D., Self-assembled Titanium Calcium Oxide Nanopatterns as versatile Reactive Nanomasks for Dry Etching Lithographic Transfer with High Selectiv...

  19. [28]

    Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 2003, 21 (6), 2545-2549

    Li, L.; Abe, T.; Esashi, M., Smooth surface glass etching by deep reactive ion etching with SF6 and Xe gases. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B 2003, 21 (6), 2545-2549

  20. [29]

    Applied Surface Science 2018, 439, 577-582

    Gomez, A.; Puig, T.; Obradors, X., Diminish electrostatic in piezoresponse force microscopy through longer or ultra-stiff tips. Applied Surface Science 2018, 439, 577-582. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Nanostructure engineering of epitaxial piezoelectric α-quartz thin films on silico...

  21. [30]

    Benoit Charlot, Dr

    Rudy Desgarceaux, Pau Escofet-Majoral, Dr. Benoit Charlot, Dr. Adrian Carretero-Genevrier Institut d’Electronique et des Systemes (IES), CNRS, Universite Montpellier 2 860 Rue de Saint Priest 34095 Montpellier, France

  22. [31]

    Jaume Gazquez, Dr

    Qianzhe Zhang, Andres Gomez, Dr. Jaume Gazquez, Dr. Marti Gich Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona ICMAB, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas CSIC, Campus UAB 08193 Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain

  23. [32]

    Guilliem Larrieu LAAS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INP, Toulouse, France γ These authors contributed equally to this work E-mail: carretero@ies.univ-montp2.fr, Keywords: Quartz, silicon, epitaxial growth, thin films, piezoelectricity, nanostructuration Fig. S1. Photo-lithogr...

  24. [33]

    J. M. Vila-Fungueiriño, A. Gómez, J. Antoja-Lleonart, J. Gázquez, C. Magén, B. Noheda and A. Carretero-Genevrier, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 20155-20161

  25. [34]

    Gomez, M

    A. Gomez, M. Gich, A. Carretero-Genevrier, T. Puig and X. Obradors, Nature Communications, 2017, 8, 1113

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.