Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Derivation of coupled KPZ-Burgers equation from multi-species zero-range processes

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that multi-species weakly asymmetric zero-range fluctuations, started from stationary states satisfying a Frame condition, converge in a traveling frame to the unique energy solution of a coupled Burgers SPDE.

desk verdict First rigorous multi-species zero-range derivation of a coupled Burgers/KPZ SPDE: substantial and mostly sound, but full convergence leans on an external uniqueness result. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07863 v1 pith:7KIQWTLW submitted 2019-08-21 math.PR cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

Cedric Bernardin , Tadahisa Funaki , Sunder Sethuraman This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP MSC 60K3582C2260H1560G6060F17
keywords multi-specieszero-rangeprocessweaklyasymmetricfluctuationfieldscoupledBurgersSPDEKPZequationenergysolutionBoltzmann-Gibbsprinciplespectralgap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that the density fluctuation fields of a multi-species, weakly asymmetric zero-range process on a one-dimensional torus, started from a stationary product measure, converge in a traveling frame to the unique energy solution of a coupled Burgers stochastic PDE — the formal spatial gradient of a coupled KPZ equation. This matters because it gives the first microscopic derivation of a singular coupled SPDE system, connecting a concrete particle model to the coupled KPZ universality discussion. The convergence is conditional on a Frame condition forcing all species to share one characteristic speed, and on a spectral-gap mixing assumption on the jump rates. Along the way the paper proves a multi-component Boltzmann-Gibbs principle and shows the limit coefficients satisfy a trilinear symmetry that gives white noise as an invariant measure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the multi-component Boltzmann-Gibbs principle (Theorem 4.1): a local, mean-zero rate function $f(\tau_x\alpha)$ can be replaced, in $L^2$ sense, by the quadratic expression $\frac12\sum_{j,k}\partial_{a_j}\partial_{a_k}\tilde{f}(a_0)\big((\alpha^{(\ell),j}_s(x)-a_0^j)(\alpha^{(\ell),k}_s(x)-a_0^k)-\Gamma_{jk}/(2\ell+1)\big)$, with explicit error bounds in terms of $\ell$, $N$, and the test function. This replacement closes the equations for the fluctuation fields. The companion machinery is the multi-species energy solution (Definition 3.1), which gives a martingale formulation of the singular SPDE (3.4) and is shown unique by an imported uniqueness result. The spectral-gap condition (SG), a uniform bound on inverse spectral gaps of canonical zero-range chains, supplies the mixing estimates needed for the Boltzmann-Gibbs principle.

What would settle it

Compute or simulate the canonical inverse spectral gap $W(k,\ell)$ for a two-species rate family satisfying (INV), (ND), (LG), (ORI), and (FC) but not (LB), such as the perturbed independent-walk rates of Section 8 with parameters outside the (LB) regime, and test whether $\sup_{\ell\ge2} E_{\nu_{a_0}}[W(\sum_{x\in\Lambda_\ell}\alpha(x),\ell)^2] \le C\ell^4$; a growth exceeding $\ell^4$ would show the Boltzmann-Gibbs replacement fails for that family, blocking the energy-solution identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the invariant measure $\nu_{a_0}$ with weak-asymmetry strength $\gamma=1/2$, and assuming the Frame condition (FC) — diagonal covariance with $\tilde{g}_i(a_0)/\Gamma_{ii}(a_0)=\lambda$ independent of $i$ — the fluctuation fields $Y^N$ viewed in the common traveling frame converge in the uniform topology to the unique multi-species energy solution of the coupled Burgers SPDE (3.4): $\partial_t Y^i = \frac12 \partial_{a_i}\tilde{g}_i(a_0)\Delta Y^i + c\sum_{j,k}\partial_{a_j}\partial_{a_k}\tilde{g}_i(a_0)\nabla(Y^j Y^k) + \sqrt{\tilde{g}_i(a_0)}\,\nabla\dot{W}^i$. The drift terms are closed by a multi-component Boltzmann-Gibbs principle that replaces local rate functions by quadratic averages of the fluctuation fields, and any limit point is identified through a multi-species energy martingale problem whose solution is unique. Thus, under these hypotheses, the scaling limit of the multi-species system is rigorously a coupled KPZ-Burgers system in the energy-solution sense.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral-gap condition (SG) — a uniform bound on the inverse spectral gaps of finite-box canonical zero-range chains — is the load-bearing mixing assumption: if the jump rates do not mix fast enough, the replacement of local rate functions by quadratic field averages breaks down and the energy-solution identification collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under the Frame condition, the limit SPDE satisfies the trilinear condition and therefore has the appropriate rescaled white noise as its invariant measure, as shown in Section 6.
  • In multi-color systems, the Frame condition holds exactly when the total density satisfies $\sigma^2(\rho_0)=\rho_0$; then the coupled KPZ equation decouples into a scalar KPZ equation for the total height plus independent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes for color differences, and the limit can be formulated on the full line.
  • For two species, any coupled KPZ-Burgers system satisfying the trilinear condition can be partially decoupled by an orthogonal transformation, while the paper constructs explicit perturbed zero-range systems satisfying all hypotheses that are not fully decoupled.
  • Linear fluctuations with $\gamma=1$ converge to a linear cross-diffusion SPDE with diffusion matrix $Q(a_0)=\operatorname{diag}(\tilde{g}_i(a_0))\Gamma(a_0)^{-1}$, giving an Einstein-relation form and a white-noise invariant measure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension to test is the failure of the Frame condition: violating (FC) by choosing unequal characteristic speeds should produce limiting fields with frame-dependent drifts or a breakdown of tightness, and the paper's Remark 1.2 indicates only equal speeds are tractable.
  • Because the Boltzmann-Gibbs principle is proved for general local functions, the same energy-solution route should transfer to other multi-species conservative particle systems, such as multi-species exclusion, provided an analogous spectral-gap bound holds.
  • The non-decoupleable two-species example suggests that for three or more species a classification of coupling tensors $\Gamma^i_{j\ell}$ satisfying the trilinear condition could reveal many inequivalent coupled KPZ universality classes; the Section 8 computations provide a concrete starting family.
  • If the spectral-gap condition (SG) could be replaced by a checkable rate criterion, the theorem would become a practical simulation tool: one could read off the limiting SPDE directly from measured covariances and rate derivatives at a density satisfying the Frame condition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the fluctuation fields of multi-species weakly-asymmetric zero-range processes on tori. For weak asymmetry of order 1/N it proves convergence of the linear fluctuation fields to a linear coupled SPDE (Theorem 3.1). The main result, Theorem 3.4, treats asymmetry of order 1/sqrt(N) under a 'Frame condition' (FC) on the stationary density: in the common traveling frame the fluctuation fields converge, in the uniform topology, to the unique multi-species stationary energy solution of the coupled Burgers SPDE (3.4). The proof develops a martingale decomposition, a multi-component Boltzmann-Gibbs principle under a spectral gap hypothesis (SG), tightness of all constituents, identification of limit points via an L2-energy formulation, and a time-reversal argument. The paper also proves a trilinear condition for the limit equation, analyzes multi-color reductions, and constructs a two-species example which is not fully decoupleable.

Significance. If correct, this is a substantial contribution: it provides the first rigorous microscopic derivation of a coupled KPZ-Burgers system, with all coefficients expressed directly in terms of the jump rates and the invariant measure rather than fitted to the target equation. The technical core, the multi-species Boltzmann-Gibbs principle and the energy-solution martingale identification, is developed in detail and appears internally coherent. The spectral gap assumption is stated honestly, and the multi-color and non-decoupleable examples are valuable complements. The main reservation is that the uniqueness step, which is essential to the strong form of Theorem 3.4, is imported verbatim from a companion paper without a verification that its hypotheses cover the present multi-species definition.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.5 and Remark 3.2] Theorem 3.4 asserts convergence to the unique multi-species energy solution of (3.4). Section 4.5 proves that every limit point satisfies Definition 3.1, but it does not prove uniqueness. The only bridge is the closing sentence 'by the unique characterization ... in Definition 3.1, stated in Remark 3.2', which refers to Remark 4.13 of [23]. The manuscript does not state the hypotheses of that uniqueness theorem, nor does it verify that Definition 3.1 — a stationary, finite-volume, multi-component energy solution with covariance (3.1), zero quadratic variation of the quadratic action, and forward/backward martingale decompositions — falls within the class treated in [23]. If, for example, [23, Remark 4.13] requires a scalar equation, a different notion of energy solution, or additional integrability, then Theorem 3.4 is not established as stated; only 'any limit point is an energy solution' would follow. Please state the exact uniqueness theorem from [23] and verify its hypotheses for (3.4) with Definition 3.1, or weaken Theorem 3.4 accordingly.
  2. [Theorem 3.4, §2.3] The statement of Theorem 3.4 lists only gamma = 1/2 and the Frame condition (FC), but the proof uses the spectral gap assumption (SG) in an essential way: it enters through Theorem 4.1, Lemma 5.4 and Proposition 5.2 to control the replacement of local functions by fluctuation-field averages. The standing assumptions (ND), (LG), (INV), (ORI) and (SG) are introduced in Section 2, but the main theorem should state them explicitly so that the reader can see exactly which hypotheses are load-bearing. In particular, since (SG) is not a consequence of the other conditions and is needed for the Boltzmann-Gibbs principle, Theorem 3.4 should list it as a hypothesis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 4.1] In the first estimate of Theorem 4.1, and again in the display in the proof of Proposition 4.2, the second factor of the quadratic term is written as ((α_k^N)^{(ℓ)}(x) - a_j^0); it should be ((α_k^N)^{(ℓ)}(x) - a_k^0).
  2. [Definition 3.1(iv)] In item (iv), 'H ∈ D′(T)' should presumably be 'H ∈ D(T)', since the martingale decomposition is applied to smooth test functions.
  3. [§8.2] The text states that the perturbed example satisfies all necessary conditions including (SG) and (LB), but no verification is given. Please indicate how the finite perturbation preserves the spectral gap bound, or add a reference to a standard argument.
  4. [§8.2 / Figure 1] The text refers to 'Figure 1' for the graphs of F and G, but no figure appears in the manuscript. Either include the figure or remove the reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SPDE coefficients and frame condition are derived from the microscopic rates and invariant measure, with no fitted parameter or self-citation chain forcing the result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 3.4, derives the coupled Burgers SPDE from the multi-species zero-range process, and I find no circular step in the derivation chain. The SPDE coefficients are explicit functions of the jump rates and the invariant measure: Q(aaa0), q(aaa0), and the quadratic coefficients c partial_{a_j} partial_{a_k} tilde{g}_i(aaa0) are computed from the model data via Lemma 2.1, Proposition 3.3, and Section 6; no parameter is fitted to the target equation, and no 'prediction' is a recycled input. The Frame condition (FC) is stated as a hypothesis on the stationary density and rates, and Proposition 3.3 merely characterizes it as diagonal covariance with equal tilde{g}_i/Gamma_{ii} ratios; it is not imposed as a consequence of the desired limit. The uniqueness of the multi-species energy solution is imported from Gubinelli-Perkovski [23], an external prior work whose authors do not overlap with the present paper; although this is the load-bearing step for the word 'unique' in Theorem 3.4, reliance on an external theorem is not circularity, and whether Remark 4.13 of [23] covers exactly Definition 3.1 is a correctness or completeness question, not a circularity. Self-citations such as [16] and [37] are used as methodological templates for the Boltzmann-Gibbs principle and variance estimates, not as unverified authorities establishing the main result. The spectral gap condition (SG) is an explicit assumption on the rates, not a consequence of the SPDE being derived. Overall, the derivation is self-contained in the sense that every quantity entering the limit equation is computed from the microscopic input, and the limit identification is independent of any fitted or renamed input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constants are fitted to data. The main theorem's coefficients are explicit functions of the jump rates and the reference density. The only hand-picked numbers are in the Section 8 counterexample. All other entries are structural hypotheses on the model or imported background theorems. The heaviest burden is the combination (SG)+(FC), which restricts the class of models and densities for which the coupled Burgers limit is derived.

free parameters (1)
  • Section 8 perturbation parameters (x, phi1) = x = 3, phi1 = 0.49
    Chosen by hand in Section 8 to build a two-species example satisfying the frame condition; used only in the numerical check that the coupled Burgers system is not fully decoupleable, not in the main derivation.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Compatibility condition (INV): g_i(k)/g_i(k^{j,-}) = g_j(k)/g_j(k^{i,-}) for all i != j and k; guarantees product invariant measures nu_{a0} (Section 2.1).
    Without (INV) there is no family of product stationary states, and the stationary fluctuation setup collapses.
  • domain assumption Spectral gap condition (SG): sup_ell E_{nu_{a0}}[W(sum_{Lambda_ell} alpha, ell)^2] <= C ell^4 (Section 2.3).
    Used to close the Boltzmann-Gibbs principle; a uniform mixing bound that is not derived for all rates, though (LB) gives a sufficient condition.
  • ad hoc to paper Frame condition (FC) on the density a0: Gamma_{ij}(a0)=0 for i != j and tilde{g}_i(a0)/Gamma_{ii}(a0)=lambda independent of i (Prop 3.3).
    Introduced specifically so the diverging drift generated by the moving frame cancels; the paper acknowledges not every stationary state satisfies it and characterizes when it holds.
  • domain assumption Lower bound condition (LB): rates grow by at least epsilon0 when a fixed vector m0 is added; implies (SG) via Lemma 2.2.
    A sufficient, explicit condition ensuring the spectral gap assumption; used to control canonical spectral gaps.
  • domain assumption Uniqueness of the multi-species energy solution for (3.4), proved by Gubinelli and Perkovski in [23] (cited in Remark 3.2).
    The proof identifies all limit points and then invokes [23] to conclude convergence to the unique process; if this external uniqueness were false, Theorem 3.4 would only give compactness of limit points.
  • domain assumption The process starts from the invariant product measure nu_{a0}, so the law is stationary for all times (used throughout Section 4).
    Stationarity is used to replace path expectations by expectations under nu_{a0} and to get tightness estimates; non-stationary initial data are outside the theorem.
  • domain assumption Non-degeneracy (ND), linear growth (LG) and origin regularity (ORI) for the rates (Section 2).
    Standard hypotheses ensuring the process is well defined and invariant measures exist with a non-empty density domain.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Derivation of coupled KPZ-Burgers equation from multi-species zero-range processes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KIQWTLW

@misc{pith2026190807863,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Derivation of coupled KPZ-Burgers equation from multi-species zero-range processes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KIQWTLW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07863}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the fluctuation fields of multi-species weakly-asymmetric zero-range interacting particle systems in one dimension, where the mass density of each species is conserved. Although such fields have been studied in systems with a single species, the multi-species setting is much less understood. Among other results, we show that, when the system starts from stationary states, with a particular property, the scaling limits of the multi-species fluctuation fields, seen in a characteristic traveling frame, solve a coupled Burgers SPDE, which is a formal spatial gradient of a coupled KPZ equation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    The infinitesimal generator of the stochastic Burgers equation

    M. G UBINELLI AND N. P ERKOWSKI , The infinitesimal generator of the stochastic Burgers equation, arXiv:1810.12014

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    A MIR , I

    G. A MIR , I. C ORWIN AND J. Q UASTEL , Probability distribution of the free energy of the continuum directed random polymer in 1 + 1 dimensions, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 64 (2011), 466–537

    work page 2011

  3. [2]

    A NDJEL , Invariant measures for the zero range process,Ann

    E. A NDJEL , Invariant measures for the zero range process,Ann. Probab., 10 (1982), 525–547

    work page 1982

  4. [3]

    A SSING , A rigorous equation for the Cole-Hopf solution of the conservative KPZ dynamics, Stoch

    S. A SSING , A rigorous equation for the Cole-Hopf solution of the conservative KPZ dynamics, Stoch. Partial Differ. Eq. Anal. Comput., 1 (2013), 365–388

    work page 2013

  5. [4]

    B ERTINI AND G

    L. B ERTINI AND G. G IACOMIN , Stochastic Burgers and KPZ equations from particle systems, Com- mun. Math. Phys., 183 (1997), 571–607. DERIV ATION OF COUPLED KPZ-BURGERS EQUATION 53

    work page 1997

  6. [5]

    C APUTO AND G

    P. C APUTO AND G. P OSTA, Entropy Dissipation Estimates in a Zero-Range Dynamics, Prob. Theory Rel. Fields, 139 (2007), 65–87

    work page 2007

  7. [6]

    C ORWIN , The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class, Random Matrices: Theory and Applications, 1 (2012), 1130001 (76 pages)

    I. C ORWIN , The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class, Random Matrices: Theory and Applications, 1 (2012), 1130001 (76 pages)

    work page 2012

  8. [7]

    SPDE Limit of Weakly Inhomogeneous ASEP

    I. C ORWIN AND L-C. T SAI, SPDE limit of weakly inhomogeneous ASEP, (2018) arXiv: 1806.09682

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    D EMBO AND L-C

    A. D EMBO AND L-C. T SAI, Weakly asymmetric non-simple exclusion process and the Kardar-Parisi- Zhang equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 341 (2016), 219–261

    2016

  2. [9]

    D IRR , M.G

    N. D IRR , M.G. S TAMATAKIS AND J. Z IMMER , Hydrodynamic limit of condensing two-species zero range processes with sub-critical initial profiles, J. Stat. Phys., 168 (2017), 794–825

    2017

  3. [10]

    E RTAS¸ AND M

    D. E RTAS¸ AND M. K ARDAR , Dynamic roughening of directed lines , Phys. Rev. Lett., 69 (1992), 929–932

    1992

  4. [11]

    F UNAKI , The reversible measures of multi-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau type continuum model , Osaka J

    T. F UNAKI , The reversible measures of multi-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau type continuum model , Osaka J. Math., 28 (1991), 463–494

    1991

  5. [12]

    F UNAKI , Invariant measures in coupled KPZ equations, Stochastic Dynamics Out of Equilibrium (Institut Henri Poincar´e, 2017), eds

    T. F UNAKI , Invariant measures in coupled KPZ equations, Stochastic Dynamics Out of Equilibrium (Institut Henri Poincar´e, 2017), eds. G. Giacomin, S. Olla, E. Saada, H. Spohn and G. Stoltz, Springer, 2019, 560–568

    2017

  6. [13]

    F UNAKI AND M

    T. F UNAKI AND M. H OSHINO , A coupled KPZ equation, its two types of approximations and exis- tence of global solutions, J. Funct. Anal., 273 (2017), 1165–1204

    2017

  7. [14]

    F UNAKI AND J

    T. F UNAKI AND J. Q UASTEL , KPZ equation, its renormalization and invariant measures , Stoch. Partial Differ. Eq. Anal. Comput., 3 (2015), 159–220

    2015

  8. [15]

    G ONC¸ ALVES AND M

    P. G ONC¸ ALVES AND M. J ARA, Nonlinear fluctuations of weakly asymmetric interacting particle systems, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 212 (2014), 597–644

    2014

  9. [16]

    G ONC¸ ALVES , M

    P. G ONC¸ ALVES , M. J ARA AND S. S ETHURAMAN , A stochastic Burgers equation from a class of microscopic interactions, Ann. Probab., 43 (2015), 286–338

    2015

  10. [17]

    G ONC¸ ALVES , N

    P. G ONC¸ ALVES , N. P ERKOWSKI AND M. S IMON , Derivation of the stochastic Burgers equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions from the WASEP, arXiv:1710.11011

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    G ROSSKINSKY AND H

    S. G ROSSKINSKY AND H. S POHN , Stationary measures and hydrodynamics of zero range processes with several species of particles, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 34 (2003), 489–507

    2003

  12. [19]

    G ROSSKINSKY , Equivalence of ensembles for two-species zero-range invariant measures, Stochas- tic Process

    S. G ROSSKINSKY , Equivalence of ensembles for two-species zero-range invariant measures, Stochas- tic Process. Appl., 118 (2008), 1322–1350

    2008

  13. [20]

    G UBINELLI , P

    M. G UBINELLI , P. I MKELLER AND N. P ERKOWSKI , Paracontrolled distributions and singluar PDE’s, Forum Math. Pi, 3 (2015), e6 75pgs

    2015

  14. [21]

    G UBINELLI AND M

    M. G UBINELLI AND M. J ARA, Regularlization by noise and stochastic Burgers equations , Stoch. Partial Differ. Eq. Anal. Comput., 1 (2013), 325–350

    2013

  15. [22]

    G UBINELLI AND N

    M. G UBINELLI AND N. P ERKOWSKI , Energy solutions of KPZ are unique, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 31 (2018), 427–471

    2018

  16. [24]

    H AIRER , Solving the KPZ equation, Ann

    M. H AIRER , Solving the KPZ equation, Ann. Math., 178 (2013), 559–664

    2013

  17. [25]

    J ACOD AND A

    J. J ACOD AND A. S HIRYAEV , Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes , Grundlehren der Mathe- matichen Wissenschaften 288, (2003) Springer, Berlin

    2003

  18. [26]

    J ANKOWSKI , Logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the inhomogeneous zero range process , (2006) arXiv: 0606778

    H. J ANKOWSKI , Logarithmic Sobolev inequality for the inhomogeneous zero range process , (2006) arXiv: 0606778

    2006

  19. [27]

    K IPNIS AND C

    C. K IPNIS AND C. L ANDIM , Scaling Limits of Interacting Particle Systems, (1999) Springer-Verlag, New York

    1999

  20. [28]

    K RUG AND T

    J. K RUG AND T. KRIECHERBAUER , A pedestrian’s view on interacting particle systems, KPZ univer- sality and random matrices, J. Phys. A: Math. and Theor., 43 (2010), 403001 (41pgs)

    2010

  21. [29]

    K UPIAINEN , Renormalization group and stochastic PDE’s, Ann

    A. K UPIAINEN , Renormalization group and stochastic PDE’s, Ann. IHP, 17 (2016), 497–535

    2016

  22. [30]

    O RTMANN , J

    J. O RTMANN , J. Q UASTEL AND D. R EMENIK , Exact formulas for the random growth with half-flat initial data, Ann. Appl. Probab., 26 (2016), 507–548

    2016

  23. [31]

    L ANDIM , S

    C. L ANDIM , S. S ETHURAMAN AND S.R.S. V ARADHAN , Spectral gap for zero-range dynamics , Ann. Probab., 24 (1996), 1871–1902. 54 C. BERNARDIN, T. FUNAKI, AND S. SETHURAMAN

    1996

  24. [32]

    M ITOMA , Tightness of probabilities on C([0,1], Y′) and D([0,1], Y′), Ann

    I. M ITOMA , Tightness of probabilities on C([0,1], Y′) and D([0,1], Y′), Ann. Probab., 11 (1983), 989– 999

    1983

  25. [33]

    P OPKOV, A

    V. P OPKOV, A. S CHADSCHNEIDER , J. S CHMIDT AND G. S CHUTZ , Fibonacci family of dynamical universality classes, PNAS, 112 (2015), 12645–12650; arXiv: 1505.04461

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Q UASTEL AND H

    J. Q UASTEL AND H. S POHN , The one-dimensional KPZ equation and its universality class , J. Stat. Phys., 160 (2015). 965–984

    2015

  27. [35]

    S ASAMOTO AND H

    T. S ASAMOTO AND H. S POHN , One-dimensional KPZ equation: An exact solution and its universal- ity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104 (2010), 230602 (4 pages)

    2010

  28. [36]

    S ETHURAMAN , On extremal measues for conservative particle systems , Ann

    S. S ETHURAMAN , On extremal measues for conservative particle systems , Ann. IHP Prob. et Stat., 37 (2001), 139–154

    2001

  29. [37]

    S ETHURAMAN , On microscopic derivation of a fractional stochastic Burgers equation, Commun

    S. S ETHURAMAN , On microscopic derivation of a fractional stochastic Burgers equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 341 (2016), 625–665

    2016

  30. [38]

    S POHN AND G

    H. S POHN AND G. S TOLZ , Nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics in one dimension: the case of two conserved fields, J. Stat. Phys., 160 (2015), 861–884; arXiv: 1410.7896

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S POHN , Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles, (1991) Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    H. S POHN , Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles, (1991) Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    1991

  32. [40]

    W ALSH , An Introduction to Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Ecole d’´et´e de probabilit´es de Saint-Flour, XIV 1984, 265–439, Lecture Notes in Math

    J.B. W ALSH , An Introduction to Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Ecole d’´et´e de probabilit´es de Saint-Flour, XIV 1984, 265–439, Lecture Notes in Math. 1180 Springer, Berlin. UNIVERSIT ´E C ˆOTE D ’AZUR , CNRS, LJAD, P ARC VALROSE , 06108 NICE C EDEX 02, F RANCE E...

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.