Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Repairing the Surface of InAs-based Topological Heterostructures

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Argon-hydrogen plasma repairs the InAs–dielectric interface and raises shallow-2DEG mobility to 45,300 cm²/(V·s).

desk verdict Useful process result with a credible mobility boost, but the passivation mechanism and variance reduction are not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08689 v1 pith:QN5LYIBH submitted 2019-08-23 cond-mat.mes-hall

S. J. Pauka , J. D. S. Witt , C. N. Allen , B. Harlech-Jones , A. Jouan , G. C. Gardner , S.Gronin , T. Wang
show 4 more authors
C. Thomas M. J. Manfra D. J. Reilly M. C. Cassidy
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords InAstwo-dimensionalelectrongasshallowquantumwellHallmobilitysurfacepassivationargon-hydrogenplasmaatomiclayerdepositionMajoranazeromodeschargedimpurities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Shallow InAs quantum wells are promising hosts for topological (Majorana) qubits, but the wet-etch step that removes the epitaxial aluminum superconductor damages the semiconductor surface and drags down electron mobility. This paper argues that the dominant damage is charged impurity states at the InAs/dielectric interface, and that an argon-hydrogen plasma applied before atomic-layer deposition of alumina repairs that interface by passivating arsenic dangling bonds and removing the native oxide. The treatment raises peak Hall mobility to 45,300 cm$^2$/(V s) in a 10 nm deep quantum well and reduces sample-to-sample variance compared with untreated or trimethylaluminum-treated samples. If correct, the result gives device makers a simple pre-deposition step that restores mobility in exactly the shallow heterostructures needed for hard-gapped proximity superconductivity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing step is the ArH plasma pre-treatment: atomic hydrogen bonds to arsenic atoms at the InAs surface, saturating dangling bonds and passivating charged impurity states, and also dry-etches the native oxide to leave an abrupt semiconductor–dielectric interface before atomic-layer deposition (ALD) of Al$_2$O$_3$ using trimethylaluminum (TMA) and H$_2$O as the oxidizer. The diagnostic that carries the argument is the Hall mobility-versus-density trace under a top gate: mobility rises with density as screening improves, peaks, then falls as the electron wavefunction shifts toward the surface, and the position of that peak plus the zero-gate density identify which scatterers dominate. The inverse trend between zero-gate density and peak mobility is the paper's main evidence that reducing charged surface states is what repairs mobility.

What would settle it

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of InAs surfaces that received the ArH plasma and Al$_2$O$_3$ deposition, compared with untreated and TMA-treated surfaces, could settle it: if the plasma-treated surface does not show reduced arsenic-oxide and reduced charged-defect signal while mobility rises, the proposed repair mechanism is wrong, even if the mobility improvement is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in processed InAlAs/InAs/InGaAs heterostructures with the quantum well 10 nm below the surface, scattering off charged impurities at the semiconductor–dielectric interface is the main factor limiting mobility after the epitaxial aluminum is wet-etched away. Treating the surface with a remote argon-hydrogen plasma for 120 s before growing 10 nm of Al$_2$O$_3$ by atomic-layer deposition passivates those charged states, yielding peak Hall mobilities up to 45,300 cm$^2$/(V s) and reducing the spread of mobilities observed across cooldowns and measurement positions. The mechanism is inferred from the density dependence of mobility — mobility peaks and then falls as the gate pushes electrons toward the surface — and from an inverse correlation between zero-gate density and peak mobility, consistent with fewer charged surface donors. Ozone-grown oxide is found to hurt mobility, attributed to oxygen-rich alumina adding remote charged scatterers.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the mobility-limiting defects are charged impurities sitting at the InAs–alumina interface and that the argon-hydrogen plasma removes or neutralizes them; the paper never directly images or chemically probes that interface, so the repair mechanism is inferred from transport data and prior surface-science studies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 120-second argon-hydrogen plasma exposure before ALD alumina growth becomes a standard pre-deposition step for shallow InAs 2DEG devices, raising peak mobility to about 45,300 cm$^2$/(V s) in 10 nm deep wells.
  • Because hard-gapped proximity superconductivity requires shallow quantum wells, the plasma repair directly addresses the damage from aluminum wet-etch that previously cut mobility from about 44,000 to 1,000–2,000 cm$^2$/(V s).
  • Samples with the highest mobility also have the lowest electron density at zero gate voltage, so zero-gate density can serve as a fast electrical proxy for interface charge in these heterostructures.
  • Ozone-based ALD oxidation should be avoided for this platform, since oxygen-rich alumina introduces remote charged scatterers that shift peak mobility to higher density and lower its value.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors do not test this, but the same plasma repair should generalize to other shallow III-V 2DEG platforms, such as InSb or InGaAs, where native-oxide charge limits mobility and hard-gap proximity superconductivity is desired.
  • A testable extension follows from the inverse density–mobility trend: zero-gate density, measured in a single quick Hall measurement, could be used as a process-control screen for surface passivation quality without sweeping the full gate range.
  • The reduced variance across cooldowns and measurement locations suggests the plasma step may also improve device-to-device reproducibility for scaled topological-qubit fabrication, though the number of samples in this study is too small to establish a yield benefit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a process improvement for shallow InAs quantum wells intended for topological superconductor heterostructures. After selective wet etching of an epitaxial Al layer, the authors compare three surface preparations (no pretreatment, TMA reduction, and ArH plasma) before ALD growth of Al2O3, and characterize Hall mobility versus top-gate density at 7 mK using a cryo-CMOS multiplexer for multi-sample, multi-cooldown measurement. The central empirical claim is that ArH plasma treatment followed by TMA/H2O ALD yields the highest peak mobility, up to 45,300 cm^2/(V s), and reduces chip-to-chip variance relative to untreated and TMA-treated samples. The proposed mechanism is that the plasma removes the native oxide and passivates charged impurity states at the InAs/Al2O3 interface, thereby reducing remote charged-impurity scattering. The paper also reports that all samples occupy the second subband at zero gate voltage, which is relevant to Majorana device design.

Significance. If the reported mobility improvement is robust, the ArH plasma step is a simple and valuable addition to the fabrication of shallow InAs 2DEGs for Majorana devices, where a clean surface and high mobility are both required. The use of a cryo-CMOS multiplexer to collect many transport traces in a single cooldown is a useful methodological strength. However, the mechanistic claim of surface 'repair' by defect passivation is inferred from transport data and a correlation plot rather than established by direct interface characterization or a quantitative scattering model, and the variance-reduction claim rests on only two chips per treatment condition. These limitations do not undermine the empirical peak-mobility observation but do require tempering or additional support before the central claim can be accepted as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 4] The claim of a 'significant reduction in variance' is not supported by the data as presented. Each treatment/oxidizer pair is represented by only two chips, and despite multiple cooldowns and measurement points the figure shows no error bars, no distribution of individual measurements, and no statistical test. With n=2 per condition, an apparent variance difference could easily be dominated by wafer-position effects or by one outlier chip. Because the abstract explicitly claims a reduction in variance, this is a load-bearing point. Please report the full set of peak-mobility measurements as points or box plots, provide a statistical measure appropriate to the sample size, or explicitly state the sample size and avoid statistically loaded language such as 'significant reduction in variance' unless a test is performed.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 5] The inference that the higher mobility of ArH-treated samples is caused by passivation of charged interface impurities is underdetermined by the data shown. The inverse correlation between the density at VTG=0 and the peak mobility is consistent with fewer surface donors, but it is also consistent with other sample-to-sample differences such as residual etch damage, bulk disorder, or a different density of oxide charges unrelated to hydrogen passivation. The manuscript does not present a quantitative scattering model that decomposes the mobility-versus-density curves into remote-charge, background-impurity, and surface-roughness contributions, nor does it provide interface-sensitive characterization such as XPS or TEM. The correlation in Fig. 5 contains five near-center points with no error bars and no stated uncertainty. Please either add a model-based extraction of the charged-impurity density from the measured mu(n) traces, add direct interface data, or explicitly reframe the 'repair/passivation' claim as a hypothesis supported indirectly by transport evidence rather than as an established mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, paragraph after Fig. 1(c)] The sentence 'Increasing top gate voltage causes the the distribution of electrons in the quantum well to shift towards the surface' contains a duplicated article ('the the'); please correct.
  2. [Section II, paragraph on ALD temperature] The sentence about In precipitation is unclear: 'above 300°C In begins to precipitate out of the substrate due to the desorption of As' suggests the InP substrate, but the precipitation should presumably occur in the InAs layer; please rephrase to specify the material and mechanism.
  3. [Section III, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The reaction equations assume In2O3 and As2O3 as the native oxides, but InAs native oxides are typically a more complex mixture; please label the equations as a schematic representation rather than a quantitative reaction model.
  4. [Section IV, Fig. 5] The x-axis is the total density at VTG=0, which includes electrons in the second subband for all samples; since the peak mobility occurs in the single-subband regime, please clarify why this quantity, rather than the density at peak mobility, is the relevant variable for the correlation.
  5. [Fig. 3] Please indicate explicitly in the caption or legend that the traces in Fig. 3 are only from near-center chips, since Fig. 4 shows that far-chip mobilities are systematically lower and the reader might otherwise infer a stronger treatment effect than is demonstrated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mobility result is a direct measurement, and the cited passivation mechanism is independent prior literature.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical transport result: specific surface treatments (ArH plasma, TMA, oxidizer choice) lead to measured changes in Hall mobility, with the highest peak mobility of 45,300 cm2/(V s) reported for an ArH-plasma-treated sample. Density and mobility are extracted directly from magnetotransport data, not from a fitted parameter that is then used to predict the same data. The only fit in the paper is the dashed guide-to-eye line in Fig. 5 correlating zero-gate density with peak mobility, and that line is not used to generate or validate the headline mobility value. The mechanistic interpretation that the ArH plasma passivates charged interface impurities is supported by prior external references (e.g., refs. 24, 39-42, 47-49) and by the observed inverse correlation in Fig. 5, but this is an inference about mechanism, not a circular derivation. The sole self-citation, ref. [27], concerns the cryo-CMOS multiplexer used for measurements and is not load-bearing for the mobility or passivation claims. The paper does not directly characterize the interface spectroscopically, and the reviewer note that the inverse density-mobility correlation could partly explain the mobility gain without invoking defect passivation is a legitimate concern about mechanistic underdetermination, but it is a correctness or evidence-weight issue rather than circularity. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no quoted result is justified solely by a self-citation chain. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in the central claim; mobility and density are measured outputs. All mechanisms invoked (charged InAs surface states, hydrogen passivation, oxygen-rich ozone oxide) are taken from prior literature or inferred from transport trends, and the Hall extraction assumes a single conducting channel at the mobility peak. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The InAs native oxide and Al2O3 interface contain charged defects (unpaired As atoms) that scatter electrons and limit mobility.
    Section III invokes refs [39-42]; the paper does not measure surface charge directly.
  • domain assumption Ar-H plasma atomic hydrogen bonds to As atoms, saturates dangling bonds, and removes the native oxide.
    Section III cites refs [24, 47, 48]; no XPS or other surface spectroscopy is performed in this study.
  • domain assumption Hall mobility and density extracted from magnetotransport at 0.05 T in the single-subband regime are unaffected by parallel conduction.
    Section II and Fig. 2 note that the second subband fills at V_TG = 0 and produces parallel-conduction behavior at high field, so the peak mobility extraction assumes single-subband validity.
  • domain assumption The near/far wafer sampling controls growth-related mobility gradients, so remaining mobility differences are attributable to surface treatment.
    Table I and Fig. 4 use one near-center and one edge chip per condition with no error bars; unmeasured process drift could confound treatment comparisons.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Repairing the Surface of InAs-based Topological Heterostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QN5LYIBH

@misc{pith2026190808689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Repairing the Surface of InAs-based Topological Heterostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QN5LYIBH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08689}
}
abstract

Candidate systems for topologically-protected qubits include two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) based on heterostructures exhibiting a strong spin-orbit interaction (SOI) and superconductivity via the proximity effect. For InAs- or InSb-based materials, the need to form shallow quantum wells to create a hard-gapped $p$-wave superconducting state often subjects them to fabrication-induced damage, limiting their mobility. Here we examine scattering mechanisms in processed InAs 2DEG quantum wells and demonstrate a means of increasing their mobility via repairing the semiconductor-dielectric interface. Passivation of charged impurity states with an argon-hydrogen plasma results in a significant increase in the measured mobility and reduction in its variance relative to untreated samples, up to 45300 cm$^2$/(V s) in a 10 nm deep quantum well.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08689 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Cross section of a shallow InAlAs/InAs/InGaAs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Representative mobility vs. density traces for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The Landau fan for sample B. The black arrow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Scatter plot of density at zero gate voltage against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Ma- jorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    R. M. Lutchyn, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, L. P. Kouwen- hoven, P. Krogstrup, C. M. Marcus, and Y. Oreg, Majo- rana zero modes in superconductor–semiconductor het- erostructures, Nature Reviews Materials 3, 52 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Mourik, K

    V. Mourik, K. Zuo, S. M. Frolov, S. R. Plissard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Signa- tures of majorana fermions in hybrid superconductor- semiconductor nanowire devices, Science 336, 1003 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    S. M. Albrecht, A. P. Higginbotham, M. Madsen, F. Kuemmeth, T. S. Jespersen, J. Nyg˚ ard, P. Krogstrup, and C. M. Marcus, Exponential protection of zero modes in majorana islands, Nature 531, 206 EP (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Nichele, A

    F. Nichele, A. C. C. Drachmann, A. M. Whiticar, E. C. T. O’Farrell, H. J. Suominen, A. Fornieri, T. Wang, G. C. Gardner, C. Thomas, A. T. Hatke, P. Krogstrup, M. J. Manfra, K. Flensberg, and C. M. Marcus, Scaling of majorana zero-bias conductance peaks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 136803 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    H. J. Suominen, M. Kjaergaard, A. R. Hamilton, J. Sha- bani, C. J. Palmstrøm, C. M. Marcus, and F. Nichele, Zero-energy modes from coalescing andreev states in a two-dimensional semiconductor-superconductor hybrid platform, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 176805 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Qiand S.-C

    X.-L. Qiand S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    Beenakker, Search for majorana fermions in su- perconductors, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 4, 113 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- conmatphys-030212-184337

    C. Beenakker, Search for majorana fermions in su- perconductors, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 4, 113 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- conmatphys-030212-184337

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    J. D. Sauand S. Das Sarma, Density of states of disor- dered topological superconductor-semiconductor hybrid nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 88, 064506 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    Takei, B

    S. Takei, B. M. Fregoso, H.-Y. Hui, A. M. Lobos, and S. Das Sarma, Soft superconducting gap in semiconduc- tor majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 186803 6 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Chang, S

    W. Chang, S. M. Albrecht, T. S. Jespersen, F. Kuem- meth, P. Krogstrup, J. Nyg˚ ard, and C. M. Marcus, Hard gap in epitaxial semiconductor–superconductor nanowires, Nature Nanotechnology 10, 232 EP (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Kjaergaard, F

    M. Kjaergaard, F. Nichele, H. J. Suominen, M. P. Nowak, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, J. A. Folk, K. Flens- berg, J. Shabani, C. J. Palmstrøm, and C. M. Marcus, Quantized conductance doubling and hard gap in a two- dimensional semiconductor–superconductor heterostruc- ture, Natur...

    2016

  8. [16]

    Zhang, C.-X

    H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, S. Gazibegovic, D. Xu, J. A. Lo- gan, G. Wang, N. van Loo, J. D. S. Bommer, M. W. A. de Moor, D. Car, R. L. M. Op het Veld, P. J. van Veld- hoven, S. Koelling, M. A. Verheijen, M. Pendharkar, D. J. Pennachio, B. Shojaei, J. S. Lee, C. J. Palmstrøm, E. P. A...

    2018

  9. [17]

    From 44 000 cm 2/(V s) [53] down to 1000 to 2000 cm2/(V s) [15, 54]

    2000

  10. [18]

    A. C. Potterand P. A. Lee, Engineering ap+ip supercon- ductor: Comparison of topological insulator and rashba spin-orbit-coupled materials, Phys. Rev. B 83, 184520 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    R. M. Lutchyn, T. D. Stanescu, and S. Das Sarma, Mo- mentum relaxation in a semiconductor proximity-coupled to a disordered s-wave superconductor: Effect of scatter- ing on topological superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 85, 140513 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Shabani, M

    J. Shabani, M. Kjaergaard, H. J. Suominen, Y. Kim, F. Nichele, K. Pakrouski, T. Stankevic, R. M. Lutchyn, P. Krogstrup, R. Feidenhans’l, S. Kraemer, C. Nayak, M. Troyer, C. M. Marcus, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Two-dimensional epitaxial superconductor- semiconductor heterostructures...

    2016

  13. [21]

    A. T. Hatke, T. Wang, C. Thomas, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Mobility in excess of 1 × 106 cm2 v−1 s−1 in inas quantum wells grown on lattice mismatched InP substrates, Applied Physics Letters 111, 142106 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993784

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Milojevic, F

    M. Milojevic, F. S. Aguirre-Tostado, C. L. Hinkle, H. C. Kim, E. M. Vogel, J. Kim, and R. M. Wallace, Half- cycle atomic layer deposition reaction studies of al2o3 on in0.2ga0.8as (100) surfaces, Applied Physics Letters 93, 202902 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3033404

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    Klejnaand S

    S. Klejnaand S. D. Elliott, First-principles model- ing of the clean-up of native oxides during atomic layer deposition onto iii-v substrates, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry C 116, 643 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1021/jp206566y

    2012 doi

  16. [24]

    G. Bell, N. Kaijaks, R. Dixon, and C. McConville, Atomic hydrogen cleaning of polar iii-v semiconductor surfaces, Surface Science 401, 125 (1998)

    1998

  17. [25]

    J. D. Watson, Growth of low disorder GaAs/AlGaAs het- erostructures by molecular beam epitaxy for the study of correlated electron phases in two dimensions , Ph.D. the- sis, Purdue University (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Yamaguchiand Y

    H. Yamaguchiand Y. Horikoshi, Step motion and as des- orption on inas(001) surfaces observed by scanning tun- neling microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2807 (1993)

    1993

  19. [27]

    S. J. Pauka, K. Das, J. M. Hornibrook, G. C. Gard- ner, M. J. Manfra, M. C. Cassidy, and D. J. Reilly, Characterising Quantum Devices at Scale with Custom Cryo-CMOS, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1908.07685 (2019), arXiv:1908.07685 [physics.app-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    L¨ ohr, S

    S. L¨ ohr, S. Mendach, T. Vonau, C. Heyn, and W. Hansen, Highly anisotropic electron transport in shallow ingaas heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 67, 045309 (2003)

    2003

  21. [29]

    Ercolani, G

    D. Ercolani, G. Biasiol, E. Cancellieri, M. Rosini, C. Ja- coboni, F. Carillo, S. Heun, L. Sorba, and F. Nolting, Transport anisotropy in in 0.75ga0.25As two-dimensional electron gases induced by indium concentration modula- tion, Phys. Rev. B 77, 235307 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    Matsumotoand Y

    Y. Matsumotoand Y. Uemura, Scattering mechanism and low temperature mobility of MOS inversion layers, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 13, 367 (1974)

    1974

  23. [31]

    J. P. Harrang, R. J. Higgins, R. K. Goodall, P. R. Jay, M. Laviron, and P. Delescluse, Quantum and clas- sical mobility determination of the dominant scattering mechanism in the two-dimensional electron gas of an al- gaas/gaas heterojunction, Phys. Rev. B 32, 8126 (1985)

    1985

  24. [32]

    F. F. Fang, A. B. Fowler, and A. Hartstein, Effective mass and collision time of (100) si surface electrons, Phys. Rev. B 16, 4446 (1977)

    1977

  25. [33]

    Das Sarmaand E

    S. Das Sarmaand E. H. Hwang, Universal density scal- ing of disorder-limited low-temperature conductivity in high-mobility two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B88, 035439 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    Umansky, R

    V. Umansky, R. de Picciotto, and M. Heiblum, Extremely high-mobility two dimensional elec- tron gas: Evaluation of scattering mecha- nisms, Applied Physics Letters 71, 683 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.119829

    1997 doi

  27. [35]

    H. Fu, K. V. Reich, and B. I. Shklovskii, Surface rough- ness scattering in multisubband accumulation layers, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235312 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Ellenberger, B

    C. Ellenberger, B. Simoviˇ c, R. Leturcq, T. Ihn, S. E. Ulloa, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Two-subband quantum hall effect in parabolic quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 74, 195313 (2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    Strmer, A

    H. Strmer, A. Gossard, and W. Wiegmann, Observation of intersubband scattering in a 2-dimensional electron system, Solid State Communications 41, 707 (1982)

    1982

  30. [38]

    Fletcher, E

    R. Fletcher, E. Zaremba, M. D’Iorio, C. T. Foxon, and J. J. Harris, Evidence of a mobility edge in the sec- ond subband of an al0.33ga0.67As − GaAs heterojunction, Phys. Rev. B 38, 7866 (1988)

    1988

  31. [39]

    Troian, J

    A. Troian, J. V. Knutsson, S. R. McKibbin, S. Yng- man, A. S. Babadi, L.-E. Wernersson, A. Mikkelsen, and R. Timm, Inas-oxide interface composition and stability upon thermal oxidation and high-k atomic layer deposition, AIP Advances 8, 125227 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054292

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    Hollinger, R

    G. Hollinger, R. Skheyta-Kabbani, and M. Gendry, Ox- ides on gaas and inas surfaces: An x-ray-photoelectron- spectroscopy study of reference compounds and thin ox- ide layers, Phys. Rev. B 49, 11159 (1994)

    1994

  33. [41]

    W. Wang, G. Lee, M. Huang, R. M. Wallace, and K. Cho, First-principles study of gaas(001)-2(24) sur- face oxidation and passivation with h, cl, s, f, and gao, Journal of Applied Physics 107, 103720 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3369540

    2010 doi

  34. [42]

    Affentauscheggand H

    C. Affentauscheggand H. H. Wieder, Properties of InAs/InAlAs heterostructures, Semiconductor Science 7 and Technology 16, 708 (2001)

    2001

  35. [43]

    H. D. Lee, T. Feng, L. Yu, D. Mastrogiovanni, A. Wan, T. Gustafsson, and E. Garfunkel, Reduction of native oxides on gaas during atomic layer growth of al2o3, Applied Physics Letters 94, 222108 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3148723

    2009 doi

  36. [44]

    Tallarida, C

    M. Tallarida, C. Adelmann, A. Delabie, S. van Elshocht, M. Caymax, and D. Schmeisser, GaAs clean up stud- ied with synchrotron radiation photoemission, IOP Con- ference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 41, 012003 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    E. R. Cleveland, L. B. Ruppalt, B. R. Bennett, and S. Prokes, Effect of an in situ hydrogen plasma pre- treatment on the reduction of gasb native oxides prior to atomic layer deposition, Applied Surface Science 277, 167 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    K. D. Choquette, R. S. Freund, M. Hong, H. S. Luft- man, S. N. G. Chu, J. P. Mannaerts, and R. C. Wetzel, Hydrogen plasma processing of gaas and al- gaas, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Process- ing, Measurement, and Phenome...

    1993 doi

  39. [47]

    R. P. H. Changand S. Darack, Hydrogen plasma etching of gaas oxide, Applied Physics Letters 38, 898 (1981), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.92194

    1981 doi

  40. [48]

    Callegari, P

    A. Callegari, P. D. Hoh, D. A. Buchanan, and D. Lacey, Unpinned gallium oxide/gaas interface by hydrogen and nitrogen surface plasma treatment, Applied Physics Let- ters 54, 332 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.100961

    1989 doi

  41. [49]

    Noguchi, K

    M. Noguchi, K. Hirakawa, and T. Ikoma, Intrinsic electron accumulation layers on reconstructed clean inas(100) surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2243 (1991)

    1991

  42. [50]

    Cabrera, M

    W. Cabrera, M. D. Halls, I. M. Povey, and Y. J. Chabal, Surface oxide characterization and interface evolution in atomic layer deposition of al2o3 on inp(100) studied by in situ infrared spectroscopy, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118, 5862 (2014), https://doi.org/10.102...

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    D. A. Henegarand P. T. Gougousi, Comparison of the reactivity of alkyl and alkyl amine precursors with native oxide gaas(100) and inas(100) surfaces, Applied Surface Science 390, 870 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    S. D. Elliott, G. Scarel, C. Wiemer, M. Fanciulli, and G. Pavia, Ozone-based atomic layer deposition of alu- mina from tma: Growth, morphology, and reaction mech- anism, Chemistry of Materials , Chemistry of Materials 18, 3764 (2006)

    2006

  45. [53]

    K. S. Wickramasinghe, W. Mayer, J. Yuan, T. Nguyen, L. Jiao, V. Manucharyan, and J. Shabani, Trans- port properties of near surface inas two-dimensional heterostructures, Applied Physics Letters 113, 262104 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5050413

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    T. W. Larsen, K. D. Petersson, F. Kuemmeth, T. S. Jes- persen, P. Krogstrup, J. Nyg˚ ard, and C. M. Marcus, Semiconductor-nanowire-based superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127001 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.