Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Tensor hierarchy algebras and extended geometry II: Gauge structure and dynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tensor hierarchy algebras, not Borcherds superalgebras, underlie the full gauge structure of extended geometry, including ancillary transformations.

desk verdict A credible extension of the Borcherds-superalgebra framework to ancillary extended geometry, with real computations and honest caveats, but the central existence claim (3.9) sits in an unavailable companion paper. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08696 v1 pith:BF25I6CM submitted 2019-08-23 hep-th

Martin Cederwall , Jakob Palmkvist This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 17B7017B8181T13 PACS 11.30.Ly04.65.+e02.20.Tw
keywords tensorhierarchyalgebrasextendedgeometryancillarytransformationsL-infinityalgebraBorcherdssuperalgebrageneraliseddiffeomorphismsgaugestructurepseudo-action
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the gauge structure and dynamics of extended geometry, including cases where ancillary transformations appear in the commutator of two generalised diffeomorphisms, are governed by a tensor hierarchy algebra (THA) rather than a Borcherds superalgebra. The central claim is that the tensor hierarchy algebra S(g+) naturally contains the ancillary transformations, which the Borcherds superalgebra cannot accommodate. If correct, the structure constants of S(g+) reproduce the geometric S tensor, and the Lagrangian L0 + L1 is invariant for finite-dimensional structure groups. The paper also provides a partial L-infinity algebra description of the gauge structure, introducing a new ghost at level (0,1).

What carries the argument

The central object is the tensor hierarchy algebra S(g+), a non-contragredient superalgebra that is a double extension of the structure algebra g of the extended geometry. It is defined using a double grading (p,q) and contains modules at level -1, 0, 1 that include the ancillary transformations. The key identity is equation (3.9), which relates the structure constants phi and ell, and equation (3.11), which identifies the geometric S tensor with a combination of ell and t. This identity is essential for deriving the ancillary terms in the dynamics and for constructing the L-infinity brackets.

What would settle it

A direct construction of S(g+) for a specific g and λ where identity (3.9) either has no solution or leads to a contradiction would undermine the central claim. For instance, checking the identity (3.9) explicitly for a case with ancillary transformations, such as g = E8, λ = the adjoint (where (λ,θ)=2), and verifying that the resulting ℓ indeed satisfies (3.11) and the Jacobi identity would settle the matter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the tensor hierarchy algebra S(g+) is the correct underlying algebraic structure for extended geometry, as it naturally harbours the ancillary transformations that appear in the commutator of two generalised diffeomorphisms. In contrast, the Borcherds superalgebra cannot support these transformations. The key identity relates the structure constants phi and ell of S(g+) to the geometric S tensor, showing that the S tensor is literally a THA structure constant. The paper also constructs an invariant pseudo-action L0 + L1 using the THA structure constants, and outlines an L-infinity algebra with ghosts including a new ghost k at level (0,1).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the tensor hierarchy algebra S(g+) exists with the claimed module content and that identity (3.9) has a solution for every relevant Dynkin label configuration, a fact the paper admits is surprisingly difficult to prove directly and is deferred to the companion paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The gauge structure of extended geometry with finite-dimensional structure groups, including those with ancillary transformations, is encoded in an L-infinity algebra derived from S(g+), with a new ghost k at level (0,1).
  • The invariant pseudo-action L0 + L1, constructed from THA structure constants, provides a complete dynamics for all extended geometries with finite-dimensional structure group.
  • The S tensor, which controls ancillary transformations, is a structure constant of S(g+), making the algebraic origin of the ancillary terms explicit.
  • The construction extends to infinite-dimensional structure groups, with the example of E9 geometry suggesting ancillary fields at ghost number 0.
  • The THA framework may provide the algebraic basis for the embedding tensor and torsion representations in extended geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's claim that S(g+) is the right algebra suggests that many other geometric structures in extended geometry, such as torsion and Bianchi identities, may also be encoded in the THA, offering a unified algebraic description.
  • The explicit construction of an L-infinity algebra from S(g+) may lead to a systematic way to construct higher brackets for other Leibniz algebras, connecting to the general theory of infinity-enhanced Leibniz algebras.
  • The appearance of ancillary fields at ghost number 0 for affine structure groups (like E9) could imply that the usual ghost counting in extended geometry needs modification for infinite-dimensional groups, potentially leading to new constraints or field content.
  • The bilinear form on S(g+) may be used to construct actions that are dual to the pseudo-action, providing a more geometric formulation of the dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that tensor hierarchy algebras S(g+), rather than Borcherds superalgebras, are the algebraic structure underlying extended geometry when ancillary transformations are present. After reviewing extended geometry and the role of the Borcherds superalgebra, the authors introduce S(g+) and its double grading, identify the structure constants ℓ with the geometric S-tensor through Eq. (3.11), derive ancillary transformations from S-brackets in Section 4, construct a pseudo-action L0+L1 in Section 5, and give a partial L∞-algebra description including a new ancillary ghost k at level (0,1) in Section 6. The paper is explicit that the full L∞ structure is not derived and that several key algebraic identities are deferred to a companion paper.

Significance. If the central identity (3.9) is valid, this is an important conceptual advance: it gives a single algebraic object encoding both generalised diffeomorphisms and their ancillary transformations, unifying double, exceptional, and more exotic geometries, and suggesting a route to infinite-dimensional structure groups. The concrete computations are valuable: Section 3 identifies a genuine invariant of S with the geometric S-tensor, Section 4 derives the ancillary remainder from the algebra rather than by direct calculation, and Section 5 exhibits a parameter-free cancellation of the inhomogeneous variation of L0. The partial L∞ brackets in Section 6 are a useful starting point and are presented with unusual candour about their conjectural status. However, the central bridge between the tensor hierarchy algebra and the geometric S-tensor is not self-contained, and several dynamics identities are asserted rather than proved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (3.8)–(3.11)] The central bridge between the tensor hierarchy algebra and extended geometry is the claim that the Jacobi identity in the local part of S forces ϕ and ℓ to satisfy Eq. (3.9), that the right-hand side has corank 2, and that consequently the geometric S-tensor is a structure constant of S via Eq. (3.11). This existence is not proved in the present paper; the text states that it “follows from the existence of the THA as defined in ref. [1]” and cites [1] only as “yymm.nnnnn”. Every subsequent construction—the ancillary transformation in Section 4, the L1 Lagrangian in Section 5, and the k-ghost brackets in Section 6—uses ℓ as a structure constant of S. As written, the main claim is conditional on an external result that the referee cannot verify. Please include a proof of the corank-2 statement, or make the dependence on the companion paper explicit and supply a citable version containing the proof.
  2. [Section 6.2, Eq. (6.25)] The L∞ analysis is explicitly partial: the text states that “we will not derive a full set of brackets and prove all identities,” and the 4-bracket identity (6.25) is checked only at q=0. The vanishing of [[c,c,c,c]] requires a representative choice for [[c,c,k]] whose consistency is argued by “it becomes clear” rather than demonstrated, and the paper ends with conjectures about the general structure. Since one of the paper’s central claims is that the gauge structure forms an L∞ algebra, the conjectured higher brackets and the needed representative choices should either be proven or the claim should be explicitly stated as a conjecture with the checked low brackets clearly separated.
  3. [Section 5, Eqs. (5.1)–(5.4)] The invariance of L0+L1 depends on two identities that are stated without proof: the involution property (5.2) for ℓ, and the vanishing of the tensor m in (5.4), which is justified by a representation-theoretic statement that is plausible but not demonstrated in detail. These identities are load-bearing for the dynamics claim. Please provide derivations or precise references for both; without them the cancellation of ΔξL1 and the vanishing of the second term in (5.3) are not fully supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References] Reference [1] is cited only as “yymm.nnnnn”; this placeholder must be replaced with a full citation, ideally with a preprint number, before publication.
  2. [Section 3, after Eq. (3.12)] The sentence “This follows from the existence of the THA as defined in ref. [1]” is repeated almost verbatim later in the section; one occurrence should contain the precise statement of what is proved in the companion paper.
  3. [Sections 4 and 5] The restriction to (λ,λ)≠1 is mentioned only briefly; a few sentences explaining the origin of the degeneration and whether the results are expected to extend would help the reader.
  4. [Throughout] The typography of displayed equations is sometimes hard to follow because of the old-style equation numbers; please ensure all equation labels are printed unambiguously in the final version.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central S-tensor identification is deferred to the authors' own companion paper, making the main structural bridge a load-bearing self-citation; the downstream computations themselves are independent.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3, after eq. (3.12), governing eqs. (3.9)-(3.11)]
    "We would ideally like to show that there always is a solution o f this form to eq. ( /three.oldstyle./nine.oldstyle). This follows from the existence of the THA as de fined in ref. [ /one.oldstyle], but seems surprisingly difficult to prove in a more direct manner, only using represen tation theory for g. ... In ref. [ /one.oldstyle], we discuss the remarkable identity ( /three.oldstyle./nine.oldstyle) in more detail, and show that the matrix Q on the right hand side in a certain sense has corank 2."

    The central bridge is eq. (3.11), which identifies a projection of the THA structure constant ell with the geometric S tensor of eq. (2.9). The existence of ell and phi solving the Jacobi identity (3.9) is not proved in this paper; the text explicitly defers it to the existence of the THA as defined in ref. [1], and to a corank-2 argument in the same ref. [1], a companion paper by the same two authors cited only as 'yymm.nnnnn'. Every later construction depends on this bridge: the ancillary transformation in eq. (4.7), the invariant Lagrangian L1 in eqs. (5.1)-(5.3), and the L-infinity brackets involving the ghost k in Section 6 all use eqs. (3.10)-(3.11). Thus the claimed derivation of the geometric S tensor from S(g+) is closed by an unavailable self-citation at the load-bearing point.

full rationale

The paper's geometric input is independent of the superalgebra construction: the invariant tensor Z, the generalised Lie derivative, the ancillary tensor S of eq. (2.9), and the Lagrangian L0 of eq. (2.12) are all defined from extended geometry and prior work, not from the THA. The positive structural match in eq. (3.11) is therefore a genuine candidate theorem rather than an equality imposed in the definitions. The subsequent computations are also explicit and parameter-free: Section 4 derives the ancillary transformation through derived brackets, Section 5 shows that L1 cancels the inhomogeneous variation of L0 using the identity (3.10), and Section 6 constructs low L-infinity brackets with explicit choices and clearly labelled conjectures for the full structure. The paper honestly flags its limitations, including the unproved nature of the corank-2 solution and the failure of the calculation for (lambda,lambda)=1 and for short-root cases. The only significant circularity concern is the load-bearing self-citation: the existence of the THA and the corank-2 argument are assigned to a companion paper by the same authors, not yet available, and the central bridge (3.11) therefore is not independently established within this manuscript. Because the downstream content has substantial independent computational content, the appropriate score is 4 rather than a higher score reserved for cases where predictions reduce by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to external data anywhere in the paper; the only hand-chosen quantities are coefficients of L-infinity trivial terms, which are gauge freedoms of the representative. The construction rests on (i) the existence of the THA S(g+) and the solvability of identity (3.9), both from companion [1]; (ii) the section constraint (2.4) imposed by hand; (iii) the restriction to finite-dimensional simply-laced g with (lambda,lambda) different from 1; and (iv) standard representation theory. The weight lambda and the group G are model inputs of the class of extended geometries, not free parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • Coefficients of trivial terms added to close L-infinity brackets (e.g., -1/2 in [[c,k]]) = -1/2; -1/9
    Hand-chosen to match the Borcherds-form brackets: eq. (6.18) is added with coefficient -1/2 'to obtain' (6.19), and [[c,c,k]] is arranged to contain -1/9 [c,[c,k-flat]] after eq. (6.26). These are gauge freedoms of the L-infinity representative, not physical parameters fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Existence and module content of the tensor hierarchy algebra S(g+), including the ~R1 generators L-alpha-M (eq. 3.4) and solvability of identity (3.9) with the stated corank 2
    Invoked throughout Sections 3 and 4; the paper states the identity 'follows from the existence of the THA as defined in ref. [1], but seems surprisingly difficult to prove in a more direct manner' (after eq. 3.12). Ref. [1] is cited only as 'yymm.nnnnn'.
  • domain assumption Section constraint Y partial (X) partial (X) = 0 imposed by hand on all fields and parameters
    Eq. (2.4); footnote 3: 'We are reluctant to use the term action as long as the section constraint needs to be imposed by hand.' All gauge-structure and Lagrangian calculations in Sections 2, 4, and 5 rely on it.
  • domain assumption Generalized Lie derivative and its commutator (eqs. 2.1-2.3) with the invariant tensor Z of eq. (2.2)
    Taken from prior work (refs. [2],[19]); the Leibniz property and the form of the ancillary remainder (eq. 2.8) are inputs to the analysis.
  • domain assumption g is finite-dimensional, simply laced (or lambda orthogonal to short roots), and (lambda,lambda) is not 1
    Stated in the Introduction and after eq. (4.7): 'the above calculation does not work for (lambda,lambda) = 1'; footnote 4 notes there is 'typically no solution' when lambda is attached to a short root. The infinite-dimensional structure-group case is only commented on in Section 7.
  • standard math Representation-theoretic background: Casimir eigenvalue relations (2.6)-(2.7), Kac's classification of Cartan-type superalgebras, and Serre-relation ideals
    Used in Sections 2 and 3 to fix the content of R(2 lambda), R(2 lambda - alpha-i), and the Phi and L modules, and to construct the projection operators.
invented entities (2)
  • Tensor hierarchy algebra S(g+) (non-contragredient double extension of g)
    purpose: Claimed underlying algebraic structure whose double grading (p,q) houses generalized diffeomorphisms (p,q)=(1,0), ghosts (p>0,q=0), ancillary ghosts (p>=0,q=1), and torsion modules; source of the structure constants phi and ell used in the action and L-infinity brackets.
    A mathematical construct defined in the authors' companion paper [1]; in this paper its relevance is demonstrated only by internal consistency with extended-geometry constraints. No external observable distinguishes it, so independent evidence is absent by construction.
  • Ancillary ghost k = K0 at (p,q)=(0,1) in the adjoint of g, plus the ~R1 module with generators L-alpha-M
    purpose: Supplies the ghost-number-1 generators that the Borcherds superalgebra lacked, needed to describe ancillary transformations and the 1-bracket [[k]] = 0 in the L-infinity algebra.
    Gauge-algebra bookkeeping; its existence in S(g+) coincides with the geometric condition for ancillary transformations, which is the paper's own finding. It carries no independent falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tensor hierarchy algebras and extended geometry II: Gauge structure and dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BF25I6CM

@misc{pith2026190808696,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tensor hierarchy algebras and extended geometry II: Gauge structure and dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BF25I6CM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08696}
}
abstract

The recent investigation of the gauge structure of extended geometry is generalised to situations when ancillary transformations appear in the commutator of two generalised diffeomorphisms. The relevant underlying algebraic structure turns out to be a tensor hierarchy algebra rather than a Borcherds superalgebra. This tensor hierarchy algebra is a non-contragredient superalgebra, generically infinite-dimensional, which is a double extension of the structure algebra of the extended geometry. We use it to perform a (partial) analysis of the gauge structure in terms of an $L_\infty$ algebra for extended geometries based on finite-dimensional structure groups. An invariant pseudo-action is also given in these cases. We comment on the continuation to infinite-dimensional structure groups. An accompanying paper deals with the mathematical construction of the tensor hierarchy algebras.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Duality-covariant particles and exotic branes

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Proposes enlarged worldline models with coadjoint orbit terms and generalized worldvolume theories for exotic branes that make E8 duality covariance manifest in a Hamiltonian formulation.

  2. Gauged Extended Field Theory and Generalised Cartan Geometry

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic Cartan-geometric construction of linearised torsion and curvature hierarchies for generalised geometries with global duality group G and local gauge group H, realised via brane current algebras.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Cederwall and J

    M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist, Tensor hierarchy algebras and extended geometry I: Construction of the algebra , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/yymm.nnnnn yymm.nnnnn

    work page

  2. [2]

    Cederwall and J

    M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist, Extended geometries , JHEP 02 , 071 (2018) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1711.07694 1711.07694 ]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Cederwall and J

    M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist, L_ algebras for extended geometry from Borcherds superalgebras , Commun. Math. Phys. 369 , 721--760 (2019) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1804.04377 1804.04377 ]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Palmkvist, Exceptional geometry and Borcherds superalgebras , JHEP 11 , 032 (2015) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1507.08828 1507.08828 ]

    J. Palmkvist, Exceptional geometry and Borcherds superalgebras , JHEP 11 , 032 (2015) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1507.08828 1507.08828 ]

    arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Superalgebras, constraints and partition functions

    M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist, Superalgebras, constraints and partition functions , JHEP 08 , 036 (2015) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1503.06215 1503.06215 ]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Palmkvist, The tensor hierarchy algebra , J

    J. Palmkvist, The tensor hierarchy algebra , J. Math. Phys. 55 , 011701 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1305.0018 1305.0018 ]

    arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Generators and relations for Lie superalgebras of Cartan type

    L. Carbone, M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist, Generators and relations for Lie superalgebras of Cartan type , J. Phys. A52 , 055203 (2019) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1802.05767 1802.05767 ]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    A. A. Tseytlin, Duality symmetric closed string theory and interacting chiral scalars , Nucl. Phys. B350 , 395--440 (1991)

    work page 1991

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Siegel, Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity , Phys

    W. Siegel, Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity , Phys. Rev. D47 , 5453--5459 (1993) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9302036 hep-th/9302036 ]

    1993 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Siegel, Manifest duality in low-energy superstrings , in International Conference on Strings 93 Berkeley, California, May 24-29, 1993 , pp

    W. Siegel, Manifest duality in low-energy superstrings , in International Conference on Strings 93 Berkeley, California, May 24-29, 1993 , pp. 353--363. 1993. http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9308133 hep-th/9308133

    1993 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Hitchin, Lectures on generalized geometry , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1008.0973 1008.0973

    N. Hitchin, Lectures on generalized geometry , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1008.0973 1008.0973

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    C. M. Hull, A geometry for non-geometric string backgrounds , JHEP 10 , 065 (2005) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0406102 hep-th/0406102 ]

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    C. M. Hull, Doubled geometry and T-folds , JHEP 07 , 080 (2007) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0605149 hep-th/0605149 ]

    2007 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Hull and B

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Double field theory , JHEP 09 , 099 (2009) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/0904.4664 0904.4664 ]

    2009 arXiv

  7. [15]

    O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Background independent action for double field theory , JHEP 07 , 016 (2010) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1003.5027 1003.5027 ]

    2010 arXiv

  8. [16]

    O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Generalized metric formulation of double field theory , JHEP 08 , 008 (2010) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1006.4823 1006.4823 ]

    2010 arXiv

  9. [17]

    I. Jeon, K. Lee, J.-H. Park and Y. Suh, Stringy unification of type IIA and IIB supergravities under N=2 D=10 supersymmetric double field theory , Phys. Lett. B723 , 245--250 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1210.5078 1210.5078 ]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Park, Comments on double field theory and diffeomorphisms , JHEP 06 , 098 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1304.5946 1304.5946 ]

    J.-H. Park, Comments on double field theory and diffeomorphisms , JHEP 06 , 098 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1304.5946 1304.5946 ]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    D. S. Berman, M. Cederwall and M. J. Perry, Global aspects of double geometry , JHEP 09 , 066 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1401.1311 1401.1311 ]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Cederwall, The geometry behind double geometry , JHEP 09 , 070 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1402.2513 1402.2513 ]

    M. Cederwall, The geometry behind double geometry , JHEP 09 , 070 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1402.2513 1402.2513 ]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Cederwall, T-duality and non-geometric solutions from double geometry , Fortsch

    M. Cederwall, T-duality and non-geometric solutions from double geometry , Fortsch. Phys. 62 , 942--949 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1409.4463 1409.4463 ]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Cederwall, Double supergeometry , JHEP 06 , 155 (2016) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1603.04684 1603.04684 ]

    M. Cederwall, Double supergeometry , JHEP 06 , 155 (2016) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1603.04684 1603.04684 ]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hull, Generalised geometry for M -theory , JHEP 0707 , 079 (2007) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0701203 hep-th/0701203 ]

    C. Hull, Generalised geometry for M -theory , JHEP 0707 , 079 (2007) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0701203 hep-th/0701203 ]

    2007 arXiv

  16. [24]

    P. P. Pacheco and D. Waldram, M -theory, exceptional generalised geometry and superpotentials , JHEP 0809 , 123 (2008) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/0804.1362 0804.1362 ]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hillmann, E_ 7(7) and d=11 supergravity , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/0902.1509 0902.1509

    C. Hillmann, E_ 7(7) and d=11 supergravity , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/0902.1509 0902.1509 . PhD thesis, Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, 2008

    2008 arXiv

  18. [26]

    D. S. Berman and M. J. Perry, Generalized geometry and M theory , JHEP 1106 , 074 (2011) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1008.1763 1008.1763 ]

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    D. S. Berman, H. Godazgar and M. J. Perry, SO(5,5) duality in M -theory and generalized geometry , Phys. Lett. B700 , 65--67 (2011) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1103.5733 1103.5733 ]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Coimbra, C

    A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, E_ d(d) R ^+ generalised geometry, connections and M theory , JHEP 1402 , 054 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1112.3989 1112.3989 ]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Coimbra, C

    A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable and D. Waldram, Supergravity as generalised geometry II : E_ d(d) R ^+ and M theory , JHEP 1403 , 019 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1212.1586 1212.1586 ]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    D. S. Berman, M. Cederwall, A. Kleinschmidt and D. C. Thompson, The gauge structure of generalised diffeomorphisms , JHEP 01 , 064 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1208.5884 1208.5884 ]

    2013 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Park and Y

    J.-H. Park and Y. Suh, U -geometry : SL(5) , JHEP 04 , 147 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1302.1652 1302.1652 ]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Cederwall, J

    M. Cederwall, J. Edlund and A. Karlsson, Exceptional geometry and tensor fields , JHEP 07 , 028 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1302.6736 1302.6736 ]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Cederwall, Non-gravitational exceptional supermultiplets , JHEP 07 , 025 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1302.6737 1302.6737 ]

    M. Cederwall, Non-gravitational exceptional supermultiplets , JHEP 07 , 025 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1302.6737 1302.6737 ]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Aldazabal, M

    G. Aldazabal, M. Gra\ n a, D. Marqu\'es and J. Rosabal, Extended geometry and gauged maximal supergravity , JHEP 1306 , 046 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1302.5419 1302.5419 ]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Exceptional form of D =11 supergravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 , 231601 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1308.1673 1308.1673 ]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    C. D. Blair, E. Malek and J.-H. Park, M -theory and type IIB from a duality manifest action , JHEP 1401 , 172 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1311.5109 1311.5109 ]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Exceptional field theory I : E _ 6(6) covariant form of M -theory and type IIB , Phys. Rev. D89 , 066016 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1312.0614 1312.0614 ]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Exceptional field theory II : E _ 7(7) , Phys. Rev. D89 , 066017 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1312.4542 1312.4542 ]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Exceptional field theory. III. E _ 8(8) , Phys. Rev. D90 , 066002 (2014) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1406.3348 1406.3348 ]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Cederwall and J

    M. Cederwall and J. A. Rosabal, E _ 8 geometry , JHEP 07 , 007 (2015) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1504.04843 1504.04843 ]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Butter, H

    D. Butter, H. Samtleben and E. Sezgin, E _ 7(7) exceptional field theory in superspace , JHEP 01 , 087 (2019) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1811.00038 1811.00038 ]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Bossard, M

    G. Bossard, M. Cederwall, A. Kleinschmidt, J. Palmkvist and H. Samtleben, Generalized diffeomorphisms for E_9 , Phys. Rev. D96 , 106022 (2017) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1708.08936 1708.08936 ]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt and H. Samtleben, E _9 exceptional field theory I. The potential , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1811.04088 1811.04088

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Bossard, A

    G. Bossard, A. Kleinschmidt and E. Sezgin, On supersymmetric E _ 11 exceptional field theory , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1907.02080 1907.02080

    1907 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Damour, M

    T. Damour, M. Henneaux and H. Nicolai, E(10) and a 'small tension expansion' of M theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 , 221601 (2002) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0207267 hep-th/0207267 ]

    2002 arXiv

  38. [46]

    P. C. West, E(11) and M theory , Class. Quant. Grav. 18 , 4443--4460 (2001) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0104081 hep-th/0104081 ]

    2001 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, U-duality covariant gravity , JHEP 09 , 080 (2013) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1307.0509 1307.0509 ]

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Bossard, A

    G. Bossard, A. Kleinschmidt, J. Palmkvist, C. N. Pope and E. Sezgin, Beyond E_ 11 , JHEP 05 , 020 (2017) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1703.01305 1703.01305 ]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Lada and J

    T. Lada and J. Stasheff, Introduction to SH Lie algebras for physicists , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 32 , 1087--1104 (1993) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9209099 hep-th/9209099 ]

    1993 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Zwiebach, Closed string field theory: Quantum action and the B-V master equation , Nucl

    B. Zwiebach, Closed string field theory: Quantum action and the B-V master equation , Nucl. Phys. B390 , 33--152 (1993) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206084 hep-th/9206084 ]

    1993 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Hohm and B

    O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, L_ algebras and field theory , Fortsch. Phys. 65 , 1700014 (2017) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1701.08824 1701.08824 ]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Roytenberg and A

    D. Roytenberg and A. Weinstein, Courant algebroids and strongly homotopy Lie algebras , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/math/9802118 math/9802118

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    V. G. Kac, L ie superalgebras , Adv. Math. 26 , 8--96 (1977)

    1977

  46. [54]

    Deser and C

    A. Deser and C. Sämann, Extended Riemannian geometry I: Local double field theory , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1611.02772 1611.02772

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Deser and C

    A. Deser and C. S \"a mann, Derived brackets and symmetries in generalized geometry and double field theory , in 17th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity (CORFU2017) Corfu, Greece, September 2-28, 2017 . 2018. http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1803....

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Leibniz–Chern–Simons theory and phases of exceptional field theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 369 , 1055--1089 (2019) [ http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1805.03220 1805.03220 ]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Higher gauge structures in double and exceptional field theory , in Durham Symposium, Higher Structures in M-Theory Durham, UK, August 12-18, 2018 . 2019. http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1903.02821 1903.02821

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Bonezzi and O

    R. Bonezzi and O. Hohm, Leibniz gauge theories and infinity structures , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1904.11036 1904.11036

    1904 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Lavau and J

    S. Lavau and J. Palmkvist, Infinity-enhancing of Leibniz algebras , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1907.05752 1907.05752

    1907 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Greitz, P

    J. Greitz, P. Howe and J. Palmkvist, The tensor hierarchy simplified , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1308.4972 1308.4972

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Lavau, A systematic approach to tensor hierarchies , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1708.07068 1708.07068

    S. Lavau, A systematic approach to tensor hierarchies , http://www.arXiv.org/abs/1708.07068 1708.07068

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.