Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Tenfold Way for Quadratic Lindbladians

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Open fermionic systems with linear dissipation fall into the same ten symmetry classes as closed topological insulators, with edge modes pinned in frequency but finitely lived.

desk verdict A real and useful extension of the tenfold way to quadratic Lindbladians; the symmetry-list argument is terse but sound. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08834 v2 pith:GJA2U4CW submitted 2019-08-23 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Simon Lieu , Max McGinley , Nigel R. Cooper This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords quadraticLindbladiansopenquantumsystemsnon-HermitiantopologicalclassificationBernard-LeClairsymmetryclassesAltland-ZirnbauertenfoldwayMajoranaedgemodesdissipativeKitaevchainsteady-statetopology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a topological classification for open fermionic systems whose density matrix evolves under a Lindblad master equation with a quadratic Hamiltonian and linear dissipators, called quadratic Lindbladians. It argues that the full excitation spectrum of such a system is controlled by a single non-Hermitian matrix $Z = H + i\mathrm{Re}[M]$, and that the physical constraints of decay and Hermiticity force $Z$ to belong to exactly one of ten non-Hermitian Bernard-LeClair symmetry classes. Under a real-frequency gap, those ten classes carry the same topological classification as the Altland-Zirnbauer tenfold way for closed systems. As a result, a topologically nontrivial Lindbladian has gapless edge excitations whose phase-oscillation frequencies are pinned inside the gap but which generically decay with finite lifetimes, and these spectral features are independent of the steady state. This matters because it tells which dissipative perturbations preserve the edge modes of topological materials and how those modes appear in spectroscopy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the non-Hermitian single-particle spectral matrix $Z = H + i\mathrm{Re}[M]$, whose $2N$ eigenvalues give the complex Lindblad spectrum through the quasiparticle decomposition $\mathcal L = 4\sum_j \lambda_j \bar\beta_j^\dagger \beta_j$. Prosen's triangularization puts the Lindbladian in block upper-triangular form with $Z$ as the diagonal block, so the imaginary part of $M$ drops out of the spectrum. The symmetry argument rests on the restricted list of allowed symmetry actions: transposition-based time-reversal $Z = U_T Z^T U_T^\dagger$, conjugation-based particle-hole $Z = -U_C Z^* U_C^\dagger$, and pseudo-anti-Hermiticity $Z = -U_S Z^\dagger U_S^\dagger$. These are the only actions compatible with the constraints $\mathrm{Im}[\lambda_i]\le 0$ and spectral pairing $\{\lambda\} = \{-\lambda^*\}$; they generate ten Bernard-LeClair classes, and the real-line-gap classification table for those classes is the same as the Altland-Zirnbauer tenfold way.

What would settle it

Construct a quadratic Lindbladian whose spectral matrix respects a symmetry outside the three listed forms, while the master equation remains completely positive and the real-line gap stays open; if its edge-mode count differs from the Altland-Zirnbauer tenfold table, the claimed exhaustion of symmetry types fails. A more direct experimental test: measure the zero-frequency spectroscopic peak of a dissipative Kitaev chain while increasing the strength of parity-breaking dissipators; if the peak centroid moves off zero without any symmetry change, the frequency-pinning claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Lindblad spectrum of any quadratic Lindbladian is fully determined by the eigenvalues of a non-Hermitian single-particle matrix $Z = H + i\mathrm{Re}[M]$, where $H$ is the first-quantized Hamiltonian and $M$ is built from the dissipators. Because eigenvalues must lie in the lower half-plane and come in anti-complex-conjugate pairs, the only symmetry operations $Z$ can respect are transposition-based time-reversal, conjugation-based particle-hole, and pseudo-anti-Hermiticity; combinations of these generate exactly ten Bernard-LeClair symmetry classes, which reduce to the ten Altland-Zirnbauer classes when dissipation vanishes. Under a real-line gap condition, the topological classification of these ten classes coincides with the conventional tenfold way. Consequently a topologically nontrivial Lindbladian supports robust edge modes pinned to zero frequency, with generically finite decay rates, and the existence of such spectral edge modes carries no implication for the topological character of the steady state; the paper proves this independence by constructing a continuous deformation to an auxiliary Lindbladian with identical spectrum and symmetries but a trivial infinite-temperature steady state.

Load-bearing premise

The whole ten-class scheme depends on the assertion that no symmetry outside the three listed forms can act on the spectral matrix while keeping the density-matrix evolution physical; that exhaustiveness is stated rather than proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A symmetry-preserving dissipative Kitaev chain remains in class BDI, so its Majorana edge modes stay pinned at zero frequency but acquire a finite lifetime through quasiparticle poisoning.
  • Spectroscopic signatures of topological edge modes in open systems are broadened peaks centered inside the gap; the peak center is protected, while the width is set by the dissipative coupling.
  • Spectral topology and steady-state topology are independent: robust in-gap edge modes imply nothing about the steady-state density matrix, and a trivial steady state can coexist with a nontrivial spectrum.
  • Adding Hamiltonian dynamics to a purely dissipative topological system generically gives its desired in-gap edge modes a finite lifetime, making purely dissipative steady-state edge modes fragile.
  • Protected imaginary-gap edge modes cannot exist for quadratic Lindbladians because the imaginary part of the Lindblad spectrum is constrained to be non-positive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The restriction of admissible symmetries to the three forms in Eq. (6a-c) comes from spectral decay and Hermiticity constraints, so the same ten-class structure may survive in interacting or non-quadratic open fermion systems that respect those constraints.
  • The classification suggests that random dissipative systems should display ten universality classes in their complex spectral statistics, mirroring the Altland-Zirnbauer random-matrix classes; this is testable in open quantum dots and disordered wires.
  • Because only the real frequency of an edge mode is protected while its decay rate is not, dissipative engineering could tune edge-mode lifetimes without closing the spectral gap, which may be useful for controlling quasiparticle poisoning.
  • The proved independence of spectral and steady-state topology implies that spectroscopic probes alone cannot certify steady-state topology in open systems; correlation-function or steady-state-response measurements are needed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies quadratic Lindbladians—Markovian open fermionic systems with quadratic Hamiltonians and linear dissipators—and reduces the Lindblad spectrum to the eigenvalues of a non-Hermitian single-particle matrix Z = H + i Re[M]. The central claim is that physical constraints on this spectrum, Im λ ≤ 0 and {λ} = {−λ*}, restrict Z to one of ten Bernard-LeClair symmetry classes generated by the three symmetries in Eq. (6). Under a real-line gap, these ten classes are asserted to yield a topological classification identical to the Altland-Zirnbauer tenfold way. The paper further argues that spectral topology is independent of steady-state topology by constructing a deformation to a system with the same spectrum but a trivial infinite-temperature steady state. The claims are illustrated with a dissipative Kitaev chain and an open SSH chain in the main text and Supplemental Material.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is an important contribution: it extends the tenfold-way classification to a broad class of open fermionic systems, predicts robust zero-frequency edge excitations with finite lifetimes that should be visible as broadened spectroscopic peaks, and cleanly separates spectral from steady-state topology. The paper uses no fitted parameters, relies on the standard Prosen mapping, and checks its classification against the external Bernard-LeClair/Kawabata benchmark and against explicit numerical spectra. The examples are instructive and consistent with the proposed classes. The main weakness is that the exhaustiveness of the physical symmetry list in Eq. (6) is not proved, and the Supplemental Material's locality argument for the steady-state-independence deformation is asserted rather than rigorously justified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Non-Hermitian tenfold way, Eq. (6)] The central classification claim—that Z must belong to one of the ten classes generated by Eqs. (6a–c)—is asserted rather than proved. The text rules out elementary relations λ→λ* and λ→−λ on the grounds that they create amplifying partners, but it does not systematically enumerate all Bernard-LeClair single-particle symmetry relations, including phase-factored and Hermitian-adjoint variants, nor does it address whether a symmetry of the full Lindbladian (3) that acts only on the Y block could add constraints or alter the class of Z. Because the real-line-gap table of Ref. [14] is imported precisely for the ten classes in Eq. (6), this exhaustiveness point is load-bearing for the claimed classification. I request either a proof that any symmetry of a physical quadratic Lindbladian compatible with Im λ ≤ 0 and {λ} = {−λ*} induces a relation of the form (6a–c), or a precise statement limiting the classification to the three symmetry forms considered.
  2. [Supplemental Material, Eq. (S23)] The proof that spectral and steady-state properties are independent depends on the existence of a local, continuous family A(s) satisfying Eq. (S23), with the same locality properties as the original dissipators and with a continuous path of orthogonal rotations Q(s). The paper asserts that a standard Cholesky decomposition gives a solution A(s) with the same locality and that Q(s) can be chosen to make the deformation continuous; neither statement is proved. For banded matrices in one dimension the banded Cholesky factor is standard, but the higher-dimensional and positive-semidefinite cases, as well as the continuity of the chosen gauge, are not immediate. Since this deformation is the basis for the claimed decoupling of spectral and steady-state topology, the gap should be closed or the claim appropriately qualified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Supplemental Material] There are small typos: 'femionic' in the abstract and 'irreversably' in the Supplemental Material.
  2. [Main text, Eq. (3)] The superoperators c_j and c_j† act on the density matrix through formulas involving the fermion parity superoperator P_F; this object is referenced by a citation but not defined in the main text, which makes the presentation hard to follow for readers unfamiliar with the Prosen construction.
  3. [Supplemental Material, dissipative SSH chain] The statement that the symmetry-breaking dissipators (S4) force the SSH model into the trivial sector of the Z2 classification is not derived; a short argument showing that the relevant Z2 invariant evaluates to zero would make the example self-contained.
  4. [Main text, Fig. 1 and outlook] The distinction between spectral edge modes (excitations of the Lindbladian) and steady-state zero modes is stated explicitly only near Fig. 1; it would be helpful to restate this distinction when discussing the physical consequences of the edge modes in the introduction and outlook.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the classification is imported from external standards and the paper's own derivations are constructive rather than self-referential.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained. The spectral matrix Z = H + i Re[M] is obtained from Prosen's exact solution of quadratic Lindbladians (Refs. [17,18]), not from the paper's own conclusions. The symmetry constraints in Eq. (6a-c) are motivated by the physical requirements Im[λ] ≤ 0 and {λ} = {-λ*}; although the exhaustiveness of this list is asserted rather than proven, that is a completeness gap, not a circular step, because the paper does not define the allowed symmetries in terms of the predicted edge modes or classification. The ten-class classification itself is imported from Bernard-LeClair (Ref. [19]) and Kawabata et al. (Ref. [14]), which are external benchmarks; the paper maps its symmetry subset onto that table rather than re-deriving the table from the Lindblad formalism. The edge-mode prediction Re[λ_edge] = 0 follows from pseudo-anti-Hermiticity and is verified by numerical diagonalization of the dissipative Kitaev chain, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The independence of spectral and steady-state properties is proven constructively by an explicit deformation that keeps Z fixed while trivializing the steady state. The self-citations [11-13] appear only in the introductory survey of prior work and carry no load in the derivation or classification. The only substantive concern is the unproven exhaustiveness of Eq. (6), which is a correctness/completeness issue rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The classification is derived from the non-Hermitian matrix Z, so the main imported inputs are Prosen's exact mapping, the BL/Kawabata classification, and the physically motivated symmetry constraints. No free parameters are fitted; example parameters are illustrative. The main unproven input is the exhaustiveness of the three symmetry forms, plus the locality of the steady-state deformation path.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Lindblad master equation (1) with Markovian, weak-coupling bath is the correct description for the open system; the Born-Markov approximation applies.
    Used in the Introduction and in the Supplementary Material Section on time-reversal symmetry to derive the jump-operator TRS condition; standard but restricts the physical regime.
  • domain assumption For quadratic Hamiltonians and linear dissipators, the Lindbladian spectrum is exactly given by eigenvalues of Z = H + i Re[M] via Prosen's BdG mapping (Eqs. (3)-(4)).
    Imported from Refs [17,18]; the paper does not rederive the mapping in full.
  • domain assumption The topological classification of the ten Bernard-LeClair classes under a real line gap, taken from Ref [14], is correct and applies to the matrices Z considered here.
    The paper relies on the Kawabata et al. classification table rather than deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper A valid Lindbladian symmetry cannot map decaying modes (Im lambda < 0) to amplifying modes; hence the spectral constraints Im lambda <= 0 and {lambda} = {-lambda*} are complete.
    This constraint motivates excluding conjugate-type TRS and transpose-type PHS, but the paper asserts exhaustiveness without formal proof.
  • ad hoc to paper In the steady-state independence proof, a local, continuous solution A(s) to Eq. (S23) exists throughout the deformation; a Cholesky-type localized construction is asserted.
    The supplementary states that a sufficiently local solution can always be found and rotated continuously, without a detailed construction under all symmetry constraints.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tenfold Way for Quadratic Lindbladians." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GJA2U4CW

@misc{pith2026190808834,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tenfold Way for Quadratic Lindbladians},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GJA2U4CW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08834}
}
read the original abstract

We uncover a topological classification applicable to open fermionic systems governed by a general class of Lindblad master equations. These `quadratic Lindbladians' can be captured by a non-Hermitian single-particle matrix which describes internal dynamics as well as system-environment coupling. We show that this matrix must belong to one of ten non-Hermitian Bernard-LeClair symmetry classes which reduce to the Altland-Zirnbauer classes in the closed limit. The Lindblad spectrum admits a topological classification, which we show results in gapless edge excitations with finite lifetimes. Unlike previous studies of purely Hamiltonian or purely dissipative evolution, these topological edge modes are unconnected to the form of the steady state. We provide one-dimensional examples where the addition of dissipators can either preserve or destroy the closed classification of a model, highlighting the sensitivity of topological properties to details of the system-environment coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08834 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Complex spectra of one-dimensional examples of (a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Hermitian time-reversal symmetry (left) must [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Lindblad spectrum for the Kitaev chain with linear, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Open-system dynamics in local Lindbladians with chaotic spectra

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For local Lindbladians with Ginibre-like spectra, eigenoperator size is locked to decay rate, giving state-independent early-time purity decay and size-limited operator growth.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [14]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  2. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  3. [2]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  4. [3]

    von Klitzing, Rev

    K. von Klitzing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 519 (1986)

    1986

  5. [4]

    Alicea, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 076501 (2012)

    J. Alicea, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  6. [5]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031005 (2013)

    2013

  7. [6]

    Galilo, D

    B. Galilo, D. K. K. Lee, and R. Barnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 245302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    D. V. Else and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. B93, 201103 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. B 93, 245145 (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    A. C. Potter, T. Morimoto, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041001 (2016)

    2016

  3. [10]

    Roy and F

    R. Roy and F. Harper, Phys. Rev. B 96, 155118 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    McGinley and N

    M. McGinley and N. R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090401 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    McGinley and N

    M. McGinley and N. R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. B 99, 075148 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    Lieu, Phys

    S. Lieu, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115135 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Zhou and J

    H. Zhou and J. Y. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235112 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Liu and S

    C.-H. Liu and S. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 100, 144106 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Prosen, New Journal of Physics 10, 043026 (2008)

    T. Prosen, New Journal of Physics 10, 043026 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    Prosen, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2010, P07020 (2010)

    T. Prosen, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2010, P07020 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    A classification of non- hermitian random matrices,

    D. Bernard and A. LeClair, “A classification of non- hermitian random matrices,” in Statistical Field Theo- ries, edited by A. Cappelli and G. Mussardo (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2002) pp. 207–214

    2002

  12. [20]

    Diehl, E

    S. Diehl, E. Rico, M. A. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Nature Physics 7, 971 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Bardyn, M

    C.-E. Bardyn, M. A. Baranov, C. V. Kraus, E. Rico, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, P. Zoller, and S. Diehl, New Journal of Physics 15, 085001 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Goldstein, arXiv:1810.12050 (2018)

    M. Goldstein, arXiv:1810.12050 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Shavit and M

    G. Shavit and M. Goldstein, arXiv:1903.05336 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Viyuela, A

    O. Viyuela, A. Rivas, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 130401 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    J. C. Budich and S. Diehl, Phys. Rev. B 91, 165140 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Bardyn, L

    C.-E. Bardyn, L. Wawer, A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011035 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Lindblad, Comm

    G. Lindblad, Comm. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  20. [28]

    van Caspel, S

    M. van Caspel, S. E. T. Arze, and I. P. Castillo, SciPost Phys. 6, 26 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  22. [30]

    Kitaev, AIP Conference Proceedings 1134, 22 (2009)

    A. Kitaev, AIP Conference Proceedings 1134, 22 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, New Journal of Physics 12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    Contains Refs

    See the Supplementary Material for numerical results on the dissipative SSH chain, a discussion of the con- ditions to satisfy the non-Hermitian time-reversal sym- metry (6a), and a proof that spectral and steady-state properties of the Lindbladian are indepedent. Contains Ref...

  25. [33]

    Dangel, M

    F. Dangel, M. Wagner, H. Cartarius, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013628 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  27. [35]

    Esaki, M

    K. Esaki, M. Sato, K. Hasebe, and M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. B 84, 205128 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    J. C. Budich, S. Walter, and B. Trauzettel, Phys. Rev. B 85, 121405 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    Carmele, M

    A. Carmele, M. Heyl, C. Kraus, and M. Dalmonte, Phys. Rev. B 92, 195107 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Campos Venuti and P

    L. Campos Venuti and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032101 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    V. V. Albert, B. Bradlyn, M. Fraas, and L. Jiang, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041031 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    T. Can, V. Oganesyan, D. Orgad, and S. Gopalakrish- nan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 234103 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Denisov, T

    S. Denisov, T. Laptyeva, W. Tarnowski, D. Chru´ sci´ nski, and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140403 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    L. S´ a, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, , arXiv:1905.02155 (2019), arXiv:1905.02155 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Breuer and F

    H. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quan- tum Systems (Oxford University Press, 2002)

    2002

  36. [44]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006), january Special Issue

    A. Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006), january Special Issue

    2006

  38. [46]

    Tenfold Way for Quadratic Lindbladians

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979). Supplemental Material for “Tenfold Way for Quadratic Lindbladians” Simon Lieu, Max McGinley, and Nigel R. Cooper T.C.M. Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambr...

    1979

  39. [47]

    Now we adjust A to compensate in a way that ensures Z(s) = H(s) + i(A(s)TA(s) +B(s)TB(s))/2 is constant and equal to the physicalZ(s) =Z(s = 0) =Z

    = 0. Now we adjust A to compensate in a way that ensures Z(s) = H(s) + i(A(s)TA(s) +B(s)TB(s))/2 is constant and equal to the physicalZ(s) =Z(s = 0) =Z. This means that H can remain independent of s, and A(s) must satisfy the equation A(s)TA(s) =ATA +BTB−BTB(1−s)2 =ATA + [s(2−...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.