Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Scalar-Graviton Amplitudes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper provides covariant, all-multiplicity tree amplitudes for two massive scalars plus gravitons in D dimensions, built from double-cover CHY recursion and KLT squaring.

desk verdict Useful D-dimensional recursive amplitudes for two massive scalars plus gravitons; explicit checks only to five points, so the all-n claim is plausible but not fully proved in the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09755 v1 pith:LAM2ZEDN submitted 2019-08-26 hep-th gr-qc

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr , Andrea Cristofoli , Poul H. Damgaard , Humberto Gomez This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords scatteringamplitudesCHYformalismequationsdoublecovermassivescalarsgravitonKLTrelationspost-Minkowskianexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to provide covariant formulas, valid in any spacetime dimension, for tree-level scattering amplitudes with two massive scalar particles and an arbitrary number of gravitons. Such amplitudes are the building blocks for extracting classical two-body gravitational dynamics from quantum scattering amplitudes via unitarity. The construction works in two stages: first compute two-scalar n-gluon amplitudes using a recursive factorization obtained from the double-cover (Λ) version of the CHY formalism, in which lower-point amplitudes are sewn together by polarization sums; then convert gluons to gravitons through KLT relations. A central structural simplification is that all longitudinal-mode contributions vanish identically when two legs are massive scalars, leaving a sum over transverse polarizations only. The paper checks the results at four, five and six points against known four-dimensional expressions and claims the recursion extends to arbitrary multiplicity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the double-cover (Λ) factorization of the CHY scattering-equation integrand: an n-point color-ordered amplitude is decomposed into sums over products of lower-point off-shell amplitudes, with the off-shell leg's polarization sewn by the transverse sum $\sum_M \epsilon^{M\mu}_i \epsilon^{M\nu}_j = \eta^{\mu\nu}$ and by the longitudinal sum (2.18). The paper proves that the longitudinal pieces cancel exactly when the two scalar legs have polarization vectors $(\vec{0},1)$ in an extra dimension, so the recursion never needs the longitudinal modes. KLT squaring, with the momentum kernel (4.5), then turns the gluon amplitudes into graviton amplitudes with arbitrary polarization tensors.

What would settle it

Compute a seven-point amplitude with two massive scalars and five gluons (or five gravitons via KLT) using the recursion and compare numerically with the direct CHY integral or with a four-dimensional spinor-helicity evaluation; any disagreement would show the factorization does not extend to all multiplicities.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that tree-level scattering amplitudes for two massive scalar particles with any number of gravitons can be written covariantly in D dimensions. The construction first obtains the corresponding two-scalar n-gluon amplitudes through a recursive factorization derived from the double-cover (Λ) version of the CHY formalism, where one gluon leg is taken off shell and sewn back by a polarization sum. It then converts gluons to gravitons via KLT squaring using the momentum kernel. A key structural result is that, when two CHY legs are promoted to massive scalars by placing their polarization vectors in an extra dimension, all longitudinal-mode contributions to the recursion vanish identically, so the recursive sums run only over transverse polarizations. The paper verifies the resulting formulas at four, five and six points against known four-dimensional results and states that the recursion holds for arbitrary multiplicity.

Load-bearing premise

The arbitrary-multiplicity statement depends on the unproven assumption that the factorization of an n-point amplitude into products of lower-point off-shell amplitudes, demonstrated at four, five and six points, remains valid at all orders when two of the legs are massive scalars.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The recursive formulas give tree-level two-scalar, n-graviton amplitudes with arbitrary polarization tensors in any spacetime dimension.
  • These amplitudes are the tree-level inputs required for unitarity-based computations of post-Newtonian and post-Minkowskian expansions for two spinless massive bodies.
  • The exact cancellation of longitudinal modes means the recursion involves only transverse internal polarizations, keeping the higher-point expressions compact.
  • Because gluon amplitudes are obtained first and then squared via KLT, the method directly inherits all-multiplicity Yang-Mills results.
  • The four-, five- and six-point specializations match the known four-dimensional spinor-helicity amplitudes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same double-cover recursion with vanishing longitudinal modes may apply to massive legs with spin, such as fermions or vector particles, if their polarization vectors are embedded in the extra dimension similarly; the paper does not discuss this extension.
  • Because the gluon amplitudes are D-dimensional and covariant, KLT-squaring them should also yield scalar-graviton amplitudes with one external leg off shell, usable as currents in higher-loop unitarity cuts; this corollary is left implicit.
  • A natural testable extension is to derive on-shell BCFW recursion relations for these scalar-graviton amplitudes from the double-cover analysis, which the paper mentions as future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents recursive constructions for tree-level scattering amplitudes of two massive scalars with an arbitrary number of gluons and gravitons in D dimensions, using the CHY formalism and its double-cover factorization. The scalar-gluon amplitudes are obtained by embedding the massive scalars as extra-dimensional polarizations and applying a factorization identity from refs. [35,37]; the scalar-graviton amplitudes are then obtained via KLT squaring. Explicit covariant expressions are given for the four- and five-point scalar-gluon amplitudes and for the four-point scalar-graviton amplitude, and these are checked against known D=4 results. Appendix B proves that longitudinal contributions vanish in the scalar case for all n.

Significance. If the all-multiplicity claim is correct, the paper supplies a useful D-dimensional, polarization-tensor-covariant representation of the tree amplitudes needed for classical post-Minkowskian two-body calculations, avoiding the restrictions of spinor-helicity in D=4. The explicit four- and five-point amplitudes and the four-point graviton amplitude are concrete and match the literature, and the longitudinal-cancellation theorem of Appendix B is a nontrivial simplification. The derivation is not circular: the final amplitudes are checked against independent results (Forde-Kosower) and the recursion is an application of previously published factorization relations rather than a fit.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4 and Conclusions] The statement in the Conclusions that the general recursive formula has been "checked ... up to six points with existing expressions in the literature for the case D=4" is not supported in the manuscript: the six-point scalar-gluon amplitude is presented only in factorized form in eq. (2.36), and the text explicitly says the result is "lengthy and we do not reproduce it here" (p. 11). Since the all-multiplicity claim in the abstract is the central result, the absence of the six-point expression or any detailed comparison makes the claim impossible to verify from the paper. Please provide the explicit six-point result (or a supplementary file) and the comparison to the literature.
  2. [§2.2 and Appendix B] The recursion for all n rests on the assumption that the double-cover factorization identity of refs. [35,37] holds for the massive-scalar CHY measure with the polarization sums (2.17)–(2.18). The paper verifies the pattern at four and five points and proves in Appendix B that longitudinal contributions vanish, but it does not give a general proof of the factorization itself, nor does it cite a theorem that explicitly covers the present case with two massive scalar legs and off-shell lower-point amplitudes. Please state precisely which theorem from [35,37] applies, and explain why the embedding of the scalars as extra-dimensional polarizations preserves its hypotheses.
  3. [§4, eq. (4.3)] The KLT formula (4.3) is used to promote scalar-gluon amplitudes to scalar-graviton amplitudes with two massive external scalars, but the momentum-kernel form of KLT is standardly derived for massless external legs. The paper does not justify the extension to massive scalars or cite a proof for that extension. The four-point example works, but the arbitrary-n graviton claim needs at least a brief argument (or an explicit reference) that KLT survives the massive-scalar embedding in the present setup.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, eq. (2.6)] The formulas for Δ12, Δ13, and Δ23 contain typographical errors: "P_4^3" should read "P_3^2" (and similarly for the other terms). Please correct these expressions.
  2. [§2.1, eq. (2.13)] The notation P^ϵM_i and P^ϵL_i is used before it is defined in the surrounding text; please define it explicitly.
  3. [§3, eqs. (3.9)] The quantity sP134 in eqs. (3.9) is not defined by the notation introduced in eq. (2.29); please define s_{ABC} for composite momenta or add a clarifying note.
  4. [Conclusions, p. 16] The sentence "We have checked our general recursive formula up to six points" conflicts with the statement on p. 11 that the six-point result is not reproduced; please either include the check or remove the claim.
  5. [§3] The paper would benefit from a brief review of the Λ-algorithm in §3, since the "master BCJ numerator evaluations" and the momentum-kernel computations rely on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the amplitudes are derived from published factorization relations and checked against independent D=4 results.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The massive CHY framework and the double-cover factorization decompositions are taken from published references, and the paper applies them to two massive scalar legs rather than re-deriving the target result from itself. The longitudinal polarization sum in eq. (2.18) is stated to have the normalization 'precisely what is needed to recover the correct four-point amplitude', which is a calibration to a known external result, not a fitted parameter that is later renamed as a prediction. The resulting four- and five-point scalar-gluon amplitudes are explicitly checked against the independent spinor-helicity results of Forde and Kosower in D=4, and the six-point recursion is stated without claiming an internal proof that could be circular. Appendix B supplies a general argument that longitudinal contributions vanish for the scalar-leg setup, so that part is not merely assumed from prior work. The graviton amplitudes are obtained by standard KLT relations from the gluon amplitudes, and the four-point graviton amplitude is verified against the known result. Self-citations to the factorization references provide the method, but those are applied as background tools and are not invoked to forbid alternatives or to supply the final amplitude values. The remaining concern that the all-multiplicity claim rests on an unproven extension of the factorization and longitudinal-sum prescription is a correctness or rigor risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on five structural inputs from prior literature, none of which is a fitted constant or an invented entity. There are no free parameters fitted to data: the Delta matrix in the massive scattering equations is fixed by consistency conditions (2.4)-(2.6), and the longitudinal polarization sum (2.18) is derived from the factorization requirement. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The CHY formula and the modified massive scattering equations (2.3) compute tree-level Yang-Mills amplitudes including massive legs.
    Used throughout sections 2 to 4; adopted from refs [30,31,32], not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The double-cover (Lambda) factorization decomposes higher-point amplitudes into products of lower-point off-shell amplitudes with the sewing rules (2.17) and (2.18).
    Backbone of recursions (2.16), (2.33), (2.36); established in refs [33,35,37,46] and cited, not proven here.
  • domain assumption Two massive scalars can be represented as massive gluons in D+1 dimensions with polarization vectors epsilon=(0,1) and momenta (p,0).
    Given in eq. (2.21) and used to convert gluon amplitudes into scalar amplitudes; follows the known massive-scalar CHY embedding [30,32].
  • standard math The KLT relations and momentum kernel (4.3) convert two scalar plus gluon amplitudes into two scalar plus graviton amplitudes.
    Used in section 4; standard string-theoretic relations [24,26,27] accepted as background.
  • domain assumption The BCJ numerator algorithm of ref. [50] and the KK basis reproduce the reduced CHY Pfaffian (3.2).
    Used in section 3 as an independent route; relies on prior algorithms and on Y. Geyer's private Mathematica package for master numerators.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scalar-Graviton Amplitudes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LAM2ZEDN

@misc{pith2026190809755,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scalar-Graviton Amplitudes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LAM2ZEDN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09755}
}
read the original abstract

Using the CHY-formalism and its extension to a double cover we provide covariant expressions for tree-level amplitudes with two massive scalar legs and an arbitrary number of gravitons in D dimensions. Using unitarity methods, such amplitudes are needed inputs for the computation of post-Newtonian and post-Minkowskian expansions in classical general relativity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Double Copy for Spinning Matter

    hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Massive spinning-particle gravitational amplitudes are obtained by dimensional reduction of massless double copy amplitudes, fixing g=2 and matter couplings, and the Goldberger-Ridgway classical double copy is identif...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix,

    D. Neill and I. Z. Rothstein, “Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix,” Nucl. Phys. B 877 (2013) 177 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.09.007 [arXiv:1304.7263 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    Spin Effects in Long Range Gravitational Scattering,

    B. R. Holstein and A. Ross, “Spin Effects in Long Range Gravitational Scattering,” arXiv:0802.0716 [hep-ph]. – 20 –

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    On-shell Techniques and Universal Results in Quantum Gravity,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. F. Donoghue and P. Vanhove, “On-shell Techniques and Universal Results in Quantum Gravity,” JHEP1402 (2014) 111 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2014)111 [arXiv:1309.0804 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix,

    V. Vaidya, “Gravitational spin Hamiltonians from the S matrix,” Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) no.2, 024017 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024017 [arXiv:1410.5348 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Bending of Light in Quantum Gravity,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. F. Donoghue, B. R. Holstein, L. Planté and P. Vanhove, “Bending of Light in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) no.6, 061301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.061301 [arXiv:1410.7590 [hep-th]]; “Light-like Scattering in Quantum Gravity,” JHEP1611 (2016) 117 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)117 [arXiv:1609.07477 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    The effective field theorist?s approach to gravitational dynamics,

    R. A. Porto, “The effective field theorist?s approach to gravitational dynamics,” Phys. Rept. 633 (2016) 1 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.003 [arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Damour, Phys

    T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) no.10, 104015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104015 [arXiv:1609.00354 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Leading Singularities and Classical Gravitational Scattering,

    F. Cachazo and A. Guevara, “Leading Singularities and Classical Gravitational Scattering,” arXiv:1705.10262 [hep-th]; A. Guevara, “Holomorphic Classical Limit for Spin Effects in Gravitational and Electromagnetic Scattering,” JHEP1904 (2019) 033 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)033 [arXiv:1706.02314 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,

    T. Damour, “High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,” Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) no.4, 044038 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.044038 [arXiv:1710.10599 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Planté and P. Vanhove, “General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) no.17, 171601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.171601 [arXiv:1806.04920 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,

    M. Levi, “Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review,” arXiv:1807.01699 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein and M. P. Solon, “From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) no.25, 251101 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.251101 [arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,

    M. Z. Chung, Y. T. Huang, J. W. Kim and S. Lee, “The simplest massive S-matrix: from minimal coupling to Black Holes,” JHEP1904 (2019) 156 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)156 [arXiv:1812.08752 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C. H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, “Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) no.20, 201603 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.201603 [arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-t...

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Energetics of two-body Hamiltonians in post-Minkowskian gravity,

    A. Antonelli, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. van de Meent and J. Vines, “Energetics of two-body Hamiltonians in post-Minkowskian gravity,” Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) no.10, 104004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104004 [arXiv:1901.07102 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    On Post-Minkowskian Hamiltonians in General Relativity,

    A. Cristofoli, N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard and P. Vanhove, “On Post-Minkowskian Hamiltonians in General Relativity,” arXiv:1906.01579 [hep-th]

    1906 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Revisiting the 2PM eikonal and the dynamics of binary black holes,

    A. Koemans Collado, P. Di Vecchia and R. Russo, “Revisiting the 2PM eikonal and the dynamics of binary black holes,” arXiv:1904.02667 [hep-th]

    1904 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Observables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes,

    B. Maybee, D. O’Connell and J. Vines, “Observables and amplitudes for spinning particles and black holes,” arXiv:1906.09260 [hep-th]

    1906 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Quantum theory of gravitation vs. classical theory. - fourth-order potential,

    Y. Iwasaki, “Quantum theory of gravitation vs. classical theory. - fourth-order potential,” Prog. Theor. Phys.46 (1971) 1587. doi:10.1143/PTP.46.1587

    1971 doi

  12. [20]

    Classical physics and quantum loops,

    B. R. Holstein and J. F. Donoghue, “Classical physics and quantum loops,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 201602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.201602 [hep-th/0405239]

    2004 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell, “Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering,” JHEP1902 (2019) 137 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)137 [arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections,

    J. F. Donoghue, “General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections,” Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 3874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3874 [gr-qc/9405057]

    1994 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Quantum gravitational corrections to the nonrelativistic scattering potential of two masses,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. F. Donoghue and B. R. Holstein, “Quantum gravitational corrections to the nonrelativistic scattering potential of two masses,” Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 084033 Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 069903] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.069903, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.084...

    2003 arXiv

  16. [24]

    A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen and S. H. H. Tye, “A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B269 (1986) 1. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90362-7

    1986 doi

  17. [25]

    Multileg one loop gravity amplitudes from gauge theory,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, M. Perelstein and J. S. Rozowsky, “Multileg one loop gravity amplitudes from gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B546 (1999) 423 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00029-2 [hep-th/9811140]

    1999 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Proof of Gravity and Yang-Mills Amplitude Relations,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, B. Feng and T. Sondergaard, “Proof of Gravity and Yang-Mills Amplitude Relations,” JHEP1009 (2010) 067 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)067 [arXiv:1007.3111 [hep-th]]; “Gravity and Yang-Mills Amplitude Relations,” Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 107702 doi:...

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    The Momentum Kernel of Gauge and Gravity Theories,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, T. Sondergaard and P. Vanhove, “The Momentum Kernel of Gauge and Gravity Theories,” JHEP1101 (2011) 001 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2011)001 [arXiv:1010.3933 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Recursion relations for gauge theory amplitudes with massive particles,

    S. D. Badger, E. W. N. Glover, V. V. Khoze and P. Svrcek, “Recursion relations for gauge theory amplitudes with massive particles,” JHEP0507 (2005) 025 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/07/025 [hep-th/0504159]

    2005 arXiv

  21. [29]

    All-multiplicity amplitudes with massive scalars,

    D. Forde and D. A. Kosower, “All-multiplicity amplitudes with massive scalars,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 065007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.065007 [hep-th/0507292]

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Scattering equations and BCJ relations for gauge and gravitational amplitudes with massive scalar particles,

    S. G. Naculich, “Scattering equations and BCJ relations for gauge and gravitational amplitudes with massive scalar particles,” JHEP1409 (2014) 029 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2014)029 [arXiv:1407.7836 [hep-th]]; “CHY representations for gauge theory and gravity amplitudes with up to th...

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions,

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) no.17, 171601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.171601 [arXiv:1307.2199 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM,

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM,” JHEP1507 (2015) 149 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)149 [arXiv:1412.3479 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Λ scattering equations,

    H. Gomez, “Λ scattering equations,” JHEP1606 (2016) 101 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)101 [arXiv:1604.05373 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Elliptic scattering equations,

    C. Cardona and H. Gomez, “Elliptic scattering equations,” JHEP1606 (2016) 094 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)094 [arXiv:1605.01446 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    New Factorization Relations for Yang Mills Amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard and H. Gomez, “New Factorization Relations for Yang Mills Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) no.2, 025014 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.025014 [arXiv:1810.05023 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    New factorization relations for nonlinear sigma model amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, H. Gomez and A. Helset, “New factorization relations for nonlinear sigma model amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) no.4, 045009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.045009 [arXiv:1811.06024 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Scattering equations and a new factorization for amplitudes. Part I. Gauge theories,

    H. Gomez, “Scattering equations and a new factorization for amplitudes. Part I. Gauge theories,” JHEP1905 (2019) 128 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)128 [arXiv:1810.05407 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Analytic representations of Yang-Mills amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. L. Bourjaily, P. H. Damgaard and B. Feng, “Analytic representations of Yang-Mills amplitudes,” Nucl. Phys. B913 (2016) 964 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.10.012 [arXiv:1605.06501 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cross-ratio Identities and Higher-order – 23 – Poles of CHY-integrand,

    C. Cardona, B. Feng, H. Gomez and R. Huang, “Cross-ratio Identities and Higher-order – 23 – Poles of CHY-integrand,” JHEP1609 (2016) 133 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)133 [arXiv:1606.00670 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Manifesting Color-Kinematics Duality in the Scattering Equation Formalism,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. L. Bourjaily, P. H. Damgaard and B. Feng, “Manifesting Color-Kinematics Duality in the Scattering Equation Formalism,” JHEP1609 (2016) 094 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)094 [arXiv:1608.00006 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations at one loop,

    T. Adamo, E. Casali and D. Skinner, “Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations at one loop,” JHEP1404 (2014) 104 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)104 [arXiv:1312.3828 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Infrared behaviour of the one-loop scattering equations and supergravity integrands,

    E. Casali and P. Tourkine, “Infrared behaviour of the one-loop scattering equations and supergravity integrands,” JHEP1504 (2015) 013 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)013 [arXiv:1412.3787 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    One-loop amplitudes on the Riemann sphere,

    Y. Geyer, L. Mason, R. Monteiro and P. Tourkine, “One-loop amplitudes on the Riemann sphere,” JHEP1603 (2016) 114 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)114 [arXiv:1511.06315 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons,

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons,” JHEP1407 (2014) 033 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)033 [arXiv:1309.0885 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Proof of the Formula of Cachazo, He and Yuan for Yang-Mills Tree Amplitudes in Arbitrary Dimension,

    L. Dolan and P. Goddard, “Proof of the Formula of Cachazo, He and Yuan for Yang-Mills Tree Amplitudes in Arbitrary Dimension,” JHEP1405 (2014) 010 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)010 [arXiv:1311.5200 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Gomez and A

    H. Gomez and A. Helset, JHEP1905 (2019) 129 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)129 [arXiv:1902.02633 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Multi - Gluon Cross-sections and Five Jet Production at Hadron Colliders,

    R. Kleiss and H. Kuijf, “Multi - Gluon Cross-sections and Five Jet Production at Hadron Colliders,” Nucl. Phys. B312 (1989) 616. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90574-9

    1989 doi

  40. [48]

    New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson, “New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 085011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.085011 [arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Evaluation of the Cachazo-He-Yuan gauge amplitude,

    C. S. Lam and Y. P. Yao, “Evaluation of the Cachazo-He-Yuan gauge amplitude,” Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) no.10, 105008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.105008 [arXiv:1602.06419 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Expansion of Einstein-Yang-Mills Amplitude,

    C. H. Fu, Y. J. Du, R. Huang and B. Feng, “Expansion of Einstein-Yang-Mills Amplitude,” JHEP1709 (2017) 021 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)021 [arXiv:1702.08158 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Gluons and gravitons at one loop from ambitwistor strings,

    Y. Geyer and R. Monteiro, “Gluons and gravitons at one loop from ambitwistor strings,” JHEP 1803 (2018) 068 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2018)068 [arXiv:1711.09923 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Scattering equations and Kawai-Lewellen-Tye – 24 – orthogonality,

    F. Cachazo, S. He and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering equations and Kawai-Lewellen-Tye – 24 – orthogonality,” Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) no.6, 065001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.065001 [arXiv:1306.6575 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Computation of Contour Integrals onM0,n,

    F. Cachazo and H. Gomez, “Computation of Contour Integrals onM0,n,” JHEP1604 (2016) 108 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)108 [arXiv:1505.03571 [hep-th]]. – 25 –

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.