Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Singular continuous Cantor spectrum for magnetic quantum walks

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read For irrational magnetic flux, the two-dimensional Hadamard quantum walk has purely singular continuous Cantor spectrum, with no eigenvalues for any flux.

desk verdict Strong new result on magnetic quantum walk spectrum; the Cantor spectrum via rotation algebra is clean, but the no-point-spectrum proof has a patchable gap in the finite-volume argument. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09924 v1 pith:KJ3U6TTA submitted 2019-08-26 quant-ph math-phmath.MPmath.SP

classification quant-phmath-phmath.MPmath.SP MSC 81Q1047B3946L05
keywords magneticquantumwalkCantorspectrumsingularcontinuousrotationalgebraunitarycriticalalmost-Mathieuoperatordensityofstatespoint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the spectrum of a two-dimensional Hadamard quantum walk in a uniform magnetic field is a zero-measure Cantor set whenever the flux per plaquette satisfies $\Phi/(2\pi)$ irrational, and that for every flux the pure point spectrum is empty; together these yield purely singular continuous spectrum for irrational flux. This matters because the same walk has completely different spectral behavior for rational flux, where the spectrum consists of finitely many absolutely continuous bands, so the flux acts as a sharp switch between band structure and fractal singular spectrum. The result connects the two-dimensional walk to the one-dimensional unitary critical almost-Mathieu operator through a shared element of the irrational rotation algebra, and rules out eigenvalues by identifying the spectral distribution function with a continuous integrated density of states.

What carries the argument

The central object is the element $w_\Phi\in M_2(A_\Phi)$: the matrix rotation algebra $A_\Phi$ is generated by two unitaries $u,v$ with $uv=e^{-i\Phi}vu$, and $w_\Phi$ encodes the magnetic walk before choosing a representation. For irrational $\Phi/(2\pi)$, $A_\Phi$ is simple, so all representations are faithful and spectrum-preserving; one representation sends $w_\Phi$ to the two-dimensional walk $W_\Phi$ on $\ell^2(\mathbb{Z}^2)\otimes\mathbb{C}^2$, another to the one-dimensional unitary critical almost-Mathieu operator, which transfers the Cantor result. For the eigenvalue half, the load-bearing mechanism is the identity $N(\theta)=k(\theta)$ between the spectral distribution function and the integrated density of states, combined with finite-volume restrictions $W_L$ built by inserting off-diagonal coins on a boundary layer; this makes each interior solution determined by boundary values, giving $\dim\ker(W_L-e^{i\theta})=O(L)$ and hence continuity of $k$ by the Delyon–Souillard argument.

What would settle it

Look for a quasi-energy $\theta$ and a sequence of boxes $\Lambda_L$ for which $\dim\ker(W_L-e^{i\theta})$ grows like $|\Lambda_L|$ rather than $O(L)$; equivalently, detect a jump in the spectral distribution function $N(\theta)$, since Theorem IV.4 identifies $N$ with a continuous integrated density of states.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem II.3: for $\Phi/(2\pi)$ irrational, $\sigma(W_\Phi)$ is a closed, perfect, nowhere dense subset of the unit circle with zero arc-length measure, and $\sigma_{\mathrm{pp}}(W_\Phi)=\emptyset$ for every flux. Consequently, for irrational flux the spectrum is purely singular continuous. To prove the Cantor part, the authors exhibit $W_\Phi$ and the one-dimensional unitary critical almost-Mathieu operator as images of one element $w_\Phi\in M_2(A_\Phi)$ under two representations of the irrational rotation algebra; since $A_\Phi$ is simple for irrational rotations, both representations preserve spectra. To prove the absence of point spectrum, they show that the spectral distribution function $N(\theta)=\tau_2(E_\theta)$ equals the integrated density of states $k(\theta)$, whose continuity follows from a Delyon–Souillard argument adapted to unitary walks by decoupling finite boxes with off-diagonal coins; inside a box, generalized eigenfunctions are determined by $O(L)$ boundary values, so eigenvalue multiplicities are $o(|\Lambda|)$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof that there is no point spectrum relies on finite-volume eigenfunctions of the decoupled walk being uniquely determined by their values on a boundary set of size $O(L)$; this determinism breaks down if the coins are purely diagonal or purely off-diagonal, because then some spin components cannot be recovered recursively.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For irrational flux, the magnetic walk has purely singular continuous spectrum: zero Lebesgue measure rules out absolutely continuous components, and the empty pure point spectrum rules out eigenvalues.
  • The spectrum is a zero-measure Cantor set, so the quasi-energy band structure is a fractal with no isolated levels, matching the butterfly picture familiar from rational flux approximations.
  • Because $W_\Phi$ and the one-dimensional unitary critical almost-Mathieu operator share the same element of the rotation algebra, every spectral feature proved for one model transfers to the other for irrational flux.
  • By the RAGE theorem in the unitary setting, singular continuous spectrum implies that no initial state is localized, so the quasi-periodic magnetic field does not produce Anderson localization.
  • The no-point-spectrum conclusion is stable under changing the coins as long as they are neither purely diagonal nor purely off-diagonal; only the Cantor part is specific to the Hadamard coin.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The simplicity argument suggests that Cantor spectrum should persist for other position-independent SU(2) coins, since only faithfulness of the rotation-algebra representation is used; the Hadamard restriction in the proof looks like a convenience rather than a necessity.
  • The identity $N(\theta)=k(\theta)$ opens a route to quantitative spectral statements: one-dimensional transfer-matrix estimates for the critical almost-Mathieu operator might imply Hölder continuity of the density of states for the magnetic walk.
  • A direct numerical check of the finite-volume multiplicity bound $\dim\ker(W_L-e^{i\theta})=O(L)$ for large $L$ would test the argument; a faster growth would indicate that the Delyon–Souillard step is not capturing the true spectral measure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the two-dimensional magnetic quantum walk W_Phi defined in (6), obtained by minimally coupling the Hadamard walk to a homogeneous magnetic flux Phi. The main result (Theorem II.3) states that for irrational Phi/(2pi) the spectrum is a zero-measure Cantor set (part 1) and that for all Phi the pure point spectrum is empty (part 2); hence for irrational flux the spectrum is purely singular continuous (Corollary II.4). Part 1 is proved by identifying W_Phi and the one-dimensional unitary critical almost-Mathieu operator as images of the same element of the rotation algebra under two representations, whose spectra coincide by simplicity of the irrational rotation algebra. Part 2 is approached by comparing the spectral distribution function of W_Phi with the integrated density of states of finite-volume truncations; the latter is shown continuous by a Delyon-Souillard-type argument, and equality of the two functions is shown by Fourier transform.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a valuable contribution to the spectral theory of quantum walks: it establishes a sharp rational/irrational flux dichotomy and identifies the irrational-flux spectrum as purely singular continuous, which is physically meaningful because it excludes both localization and absolutely continuous transport. The proof strategy is elegant and mostly transparent: the Cantor-spectrum part is a parameter-free algebraic argument using simplicity of the rotation algebra and the cited theorem [36], while the no-point-spectrum part introduces a comparison between the spectral distribution function and the density of states, adapting the Delyon-Souillard mechanism to unitary operators. The paper is honest about the restriction to Hadamard coins for the Cantor part and notes the greater generality of the no-point-spectrum argument. However, one load-bearing step in the proof of Theorem II.3(2) is incomplete as written, so the manuscript requires revision before it is fully rigorous.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section IV, Proposition IV.7 and its proof, equations (36)-(41)] The eigenvalue counting measure in the density of states is built from W_L = P_L W_d P*_L, where W_d is the decoupled walk of Lemma IV.5. However, the determinism argument in the proof of Proposition IV.7 is carried out for a walk of the form (1), i.e. for W, with equations (37)-(39) describing the action of W. Lemma IV.5 states that W_d differs from W on (Delta Lambda)^2, and this set contains the boundary strips used in the algorithm: in particular, sites with x1=-L and x1=-L+1 are within distance 2 of the left edge of Delta Lambda, and sites with x2=L and x2=L-1 are within distance 2 of the upper edge of Delta Lambda. At those sites the eigenvalue equation W_L psi = z psi is not the equation (37) used to determine psi(x,+), and the paper does not show that W_d coincides with W there. Consequently the inequality dim ker(W_L - e^{i theta}) <= 2|(36)| in (40) is not established as written. Since this bound is the input to the Delyon-Souillard argument in (41), the proof of absence of point spectrum (Theorem II.3(2)) is incomplete. The gap appears patchable: including the O(L) sites of Lambda cap (Delta Lambda)^2 in the boundary data would still yield an O(L) bound, but the manuscript must be revised to make this explicit.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.B, equations (8), (14), (15)] With the definitions pi_1(u)|x> = |x+1> and pi_1(v)|x> = e^{i(x Phi + theta)}|x>, one obtains uv = e^{i Phi} vu, not uv = e^{-i Phi} vu as in (8). Thus pi_1 is a representation of A_{-Phi} rather than A_Phi as stated. The spectral conclusion is unaffected because A_Phi is isomorphic to A_{-Phi} and the automorphism u -> u*, v -> v* conjugates w_Phi to sigma_1 w_Phi sigma_1, but the text should be corrected or clarified.
  2. [Section IV, Proposition IV.7] The assumption 'the coins C_j are either not completely diagonal or not completely off-diagonal' is ambiguous. The proof of the first case requires for each j that C_j is not completely diagonal, so that the coefficients c^j_{12} and c^j_{21} are nonzero; the second case requires for each j that C_j is not completely off-diagonal, so that c^j_{11} and c^j_{22} are nonzero. For the magnetic walk this is satisfied, but the proposition should state the hypothesis precisely.
  3. [Section IV, proof of Proposition IV.7, sentence containing (35)] The statement that continuity of k follows from the pointwise vanishing of tr(chi_{e^{i theta}}(W_L))/|Lambda_L| in (35) is not correct in general: a weak limit of measures can have an atom even if each approximating measure has zero mass at that exact point. The paper cites the Delyon-Souillard argument, which indeed gives the needed control on small arcs, but the first sentence should be rephrased to indicate that the full argument from [33] is being invoked rather than the pointwise criterion alone.
  4. [Section IV, Proposition IV.9] Weak convergence of dk_L to dN directly yields equality k(theta)=N(theta) only at continuity points of N. Since k is continuous by Proposition IV.7, equality on the dense set of continuity points is sufficient to conclude N=k and hence that N is continuous, but the proof should say this explicitly rather than assert equality for all theta without qualification.
  5. [Throughout] There are several small typographical and grammatical issues, including 'the spectrum of of W_Phi' before equation (24) and in the introduction, 'Moreover replace S_alpha' in the proof of Lemma IV.5, and 'There is an additional challenge present here when compared to the Hamiltonian case.' These should be cleaned up in revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectral claims are deduced from external published results, with no fitted input, renamed conclusion, or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper derives two main claims: Cantor spectrum for irrational flux and absence of pure point spectrum for any field. The Cantor part rests on Theorem III.1, quoted as '[36, Thm.1.1c]: Let Φ/(2π) be irrational. Then, the spectrum of ~W_Φ is a zero measure Cantor set for all θ,' together with the rotation-algebra argument that W_Φ and ~W_Φ are images of the same element w_Φ under representations of a simple C*-algebra, so spectra coincide by Proposition III.2. Reference [36] is an independent published theorem about the unitary critical almost-Mathieu operator; although co-authored by J. Fillman, a co-author of the present paper, it does not presuppose the results of this paper, so this is normal self-citation rather than load-bearing circularity. The pure-point part is proved by identifying the spectral distribution function with the integrated density of states (Proposition IV.9) and showing the latter is continuous via the Delyon–Souillard argument (Proposition IV.7), with the dimension bound dim(ker(W_L − e^{iθ})) ≤ 2|(36)| obtained by an explicit determinism algorithm for generalized eigenfunctions. No parameter is fitted to the target spectrum, no prediction is statistically forced, and no conclusion is renamed as an input. The skeptical concern that the determinism algorithm is stated for W rather than the decoupled finite-volume W_L is a potential correctness gap in the proof as written, not a circularity: it does not make the conclusion equivalent to an input by construction. Accordingly, no circular step meets the required evidentiary standard, and the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the magnetic flux is the physical system parameter and theta is an irrelevant gauge-like phase. The proof imports nontrivial results from [36, 52, 55, 33]; the most important is [36]. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Rieffel: the rotation C*-algebra A_Phi is simple for Phi/(2pi) irrational.
    Invoked in Section III to conclude every representation is faithful and hence spectra of images coincide (Prop III.2, Cor III.3). See [52].
  • standard math Fillman-Ong-Zhang Theorem III.1: the unitary critical almost Mathieu operator has zero-measure Cantor spectrum for irrational Phi.
    The core ingredient for part 1 of Theorem II.3; not reproved here. Note [36] includes a co-author of this paper.
  • standard math Shubin's results on the discrete magnetic Laplacian: trivial center of the von Neumann algebra, uniqueness of the trace, and kernel covariance used in Lemma IV.2.
    Used in Section IV to prove the SDF equals the IDS and to get diagonal constancy in (47). Cited to [55].
  • standard math Delyon-Souillard: for finite-difference operators the integrated density of states is continuous, adapted here to unitary truncated walks.
    Adapted in Proposition IV.7 to prove continuity of k(theta); original cited as [33].
  • domain assumption The discrete minimal coupling construction of [22] defines W_Phi as a unitary magnetic walk and guarantees the coins are neither purely diagonal nor purely off-diagonal.
    The model is taken from prior work; non-degeneracy of the Hadamard coin is verified in Remark II.1 and required for Proposition IV.7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Singular continuous Cantor spectrum for magnetic quantum walks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KJ3U6TTA

@misc{pith2026190809924,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Singular continuous Cantor spectrum for magnetic quantum walks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KJ3U6TTA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09924}
}
abstract

In this note, we consider a physical system given by a two-dimensional quantum walk in an external magnetic field. In this setup, we show that both the topological structure as well as its type depend sensitively on the value of the magnetic flux $\Phi$: while for $\Phi/(2{\pi})$ rational the spectrum is known to consist of bands, we show that for $\Phi/(2{\pi})$ irrational the spectrum is a zero-measure Cantor set and the spectral measures have no pure point part.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09924 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The spectra of the two-dimensional magnetic walk (6) for rational fields [17] resembles a two-fold copy of the Hofstadter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The algorithm to determine a generalized eigenfunction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [36]

    J. Fillman. Ballistic transport for limit-periodic jacobi matrices with applications to quantum many-body problems. Commun. Math. Phys. , 350:1275–1297, 2017.arXiv:1603.01173

  2. [21]

    Cedzich, T

    C. Cedzich, T. Geib, F. A. Grünbaum, C. Stahl, L. Velázquez, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. Quantum walks: Schur functions meet symmetry protected topological phases. 2019.arXiv:1903.07494

  3. [1]

    For Φ/(2π) /∈ Q the spectrum ofWΦ is a zero-measure Cantor set

  4. [2]

    upwards” instead of “downwards

    For any magnetic field the pure point spectrum ofWΦ is empty. The zero-measure statement in the theorem refers to the arc-length measure on the circle. When we say that a subset K of the circle is a Cantor set, we mean thatK is a closed, perfect, nowhere dense subset of the circle in the standard topology thereupon. Together, these results imply the follow...

  5. [3]

    Aharonov, L

    Y. Aharonov, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury. Quantum random walks.Phys. Rev. A , 48(2):1687, 1993

  6. [4]

    Bound Molecules in an Interacting Quantum Walk

    A. Ahlbrecht, A. Alberti, D. Meschede, V. B. Scholz, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. Molecular binding in interacting quantum walks. New J. Phys. , 14:073050, 2012. arXiv:1105.1051

  7. [5]

    Ahlbrecht, C

    A. Ahlbrecht, C. Cedzich, R. Matjeschk, V. Scholz, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. Asymptotic behavior of quantum walks with spatio-temporal coin fluctuations.Quantum Inf. Process., 11:1219–1249, 2012.arXiv:1201.4839

  8. [6]

    Ahlbrecht, V

    A. Ahlbrecht, V. B. Scholz, and A. H. Werner. Disordered quantum walks in one lattice dimension.J. Math. Phys. , 52:102201, 2011. arXiv:1101.2298

Show all 58 references
  1. [7]

    Ahlbrecht, H

    A. Ahlbrecht, H. Vogts, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. Asymptotic evolution of quantum walks with random coin.J. Math. Phys., 52:042201, 2011. arXiv:1009.2019

  2. [8]

    Ambainis

    A. Ambainis. Quantum walks and their algorithmic applications. Int. J. Quantum Inf. , 1(04):507–518, 2003. arXiv:quant-ph/0403120

  3. [9]

    Ambainis, E

    A. Ambainis, E. Bach, A. Nayak, and A. V. Watrous. One-dimensional quantum walks. InProc. STOC ’01, pages 37–49, New York, 2001. ACM

  4. [10]

    Applebaum

    D. Applebaum. Probability Measures on Compact Lie Groups . Springer International Publishing, 2014

  5. [11]

    Avila and S

    A. Avila and S. Jitomirskaya. The ten Martini problem.Ann. Math., pages 303–342, 2009

  6. [12]

    Avila, S

    A. Avila, S. Jitomirskaya, and C. Marx. Spectral theory of extended harper’s model and a question by Erdos and Szekeres. Invent. Math., 210:293–339, 2017.arXiv:1602.05111

  7. [13]

    S. D. Berry and J. B. Wang. Two-particle quantum walks: Entanglement and graph isomorphism testing.Phys. Rev. A , 83(4):042317, 2011. arXiv:1002.3003

  8. [14]

    Bourgain, F

    J. Bourgain, F. A. Grünbaum, L. Velázquez, and J. Wilkening. Quantum recurrence of a subspace and operator-valued Schur functions. Commun. Math. Phys. , 329:1031–1067, 2014.arXiv:1302.7286

  9. [15]

    Bratteli and D

    O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson. Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 1 . Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer, second edition, 1987

  10. [16]

    E. Brown. Bloch electrons in a uniform magnetic field.Phys. Rev., 133(4A):A1038, 1964

  11. [17]

    Cantero, F

    M.-J. Cantero, F. A. Grünbaum, L. Moral, and L. Velázquez. Matrix-valued Szegő polynomials and quantum random walks. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 63:464–507, 2010.arXiv:0901.2244

  12. [18]

    Cantero, F

    M.-J. Cantero, F. A. Grünbaum, L. Moral, and L. Velázquez. The CGMV method for quantum walks.Quantum Inf. Process., 11:1149–1192, 2012

  13. [19]

    Quantum Walks in Grenoble

    C. Cedzich. Quantum walks in electric fields, 2012. Talk given at the workshop “Quantum Walks in Grenoble”

  14. [20]

    Cedzich, T

    C. Cedzich, T. Geib, F. A. Grünbaum, C. Stahl, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. The topological classification of one-dimensional symmetric quantum walks.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré , 19(2):325–383, 2018.arXiv:1611.04439

  15. [22]

    Cedzich, T

    C. Cedzich, T. Geib, C. Stahl, L. Velázquez, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. Complete homotopy invariants for translation invariant symmetric quantum walks on a chain.Quantum, 2:95, 2018. arXiv:1804.04520

  16. [23]

    Cedzich, T

    C. Cedzich, T. Geib, P. Tieben, and R. F. Werner. Rational magnetic fields on the lattice: Regrouping invariance. In preparation

  17. [24]

    Quantumwalksinexternalgaugefields

    C.Cedzich, T.Geib, A.H.Werner, andR.F.Werner. Quantumwalksinexternalgaugefields. J. Math. Phys., 60(1):012107,

  18. [25]

    Cedzich, F

    C. Cedzich, F. A. Grünbaum, C. Stahl, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. Bulk-edge correspondence of one-dimensional quantum walks. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 49(21):21LT01, 2016.arXiv:1502.02592

  19. [26]

    Cedzich, F

    C. Cedzich, F. A. Grünbaum, L. Velázquez, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. A quantum dynamical approach to matrix Khrushchev’s formulas.Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 69(5):909–957, 2016.arXiv:1405.0985

  20. [27]

    Cedzich, T

    C. Cedzich, T. Rybár, A. H. Werner, A. Alberti, M. Genske, and R. F. Werner. Propagation of quantum walks in electric fields.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:160601, Oct 2013.arXiv:1302.2081. 11

  21. [28]

    Cedzich and A

    C. Cedzich and A. H. Werner. Anderson localization for electric quantum walks and skew-shift CMV matrices. 2019. arXiv:1906.11931

  22. [29]

    A. M. Childs. Universal computation by quantum walk.Phys. Rev. Lett., 102(18):180501, 2009. arXiv:0806.1972

  23. [30]

    A. M. Childs, R. Cleve, E. Deotto, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, and D. A. Spielman. Exponential algorithmic speedup by a quantum walk. InProc. STOC ’03, pages 59–68. ACM, 2003.arXiv:quant-ph/0209131

  24. [31]

    Cycon, R

    H. Cycon, R. G. Froese, W. Kirsch, and B. Simon.Schrödinger operators, with applications to quantum mechanics and global geometry. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Berlin, 1987

  25. [32]

    Damanik, J

    D. Damanik, J. Erickson, J. Fillman, G. Hinkle, and A. Vu. Quantum intermittency for sparse CMV matrices with an application to quantum walks on the half-line.J. Approx. Th. , 208:59–84, 2016.arXiv:1507.02041

  26. [33]

    Damanik, J

    D. Damanik, J. Fillman, and D. Ong. Spreading estimates for quantum walks on the integer lattice via power-law bounds on transfer matrices. J. Math. Pures. Appl. , 105:293–341, 2016.arXiv:1505.07292

  27. [34]

    Dynamicsofunitaryoperators

    D.Damanik, J.Fillman, andR.Vance. Dynamicsofunitaryoperators. J. Fract. Geom., 1:391–425, 2014.arXiv:1308.1811

  28. [35]

    Delyon and B

    F. Delyon and B. Souillard. Remark on the continuity of the density of states of ergodic finite difference operators. Commun. Math. Phys. , 94(2):289–291, 1984

  29. [37]

    Fillman and D

    J. Fillman and D. Ong. Purely singular continuous spectrum for limit-periodic cmv operators with applications to quantum walks. J. Funct. Anal., 272:5107–5143, 2017.arXiv:1610.06159

  30. [38]

    Fillman, D

    J. Fillman, D. C. Ong, and Z. Zhang. Spectral characteristics of the unitary critical almost-Mathieu operator.Commun. Math. Phys., pages 1–37, 2016.arXiv:1512.07641

  31. [39]

    P. A. Grillet.Abstract algebra, volume 242. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

  32. [40]

    Grimmett, S

    G. Grimmett, S. Janson, and P. F. Scudo. Weak limits for quantum random walks. Phys. Rev. E , 69:026119, 2004. arXiv:quant-ph/0309135

  33. [41]

    F. A. Grünbaum, L. Velázquez, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner. Recurrence for discrete time unitary evolutions.Commun. Math. Phys., 320:543–569, 2013.arXiv:1202.3903

  34. [42]

    D. R. Hofstadter. Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. B, 14:2239–2249, Sep 1976

  35. [43]

    Jitomirskaya

    S. Jitomirskaya. Metal-insulator transition for the almost Mathieu operator. Ann. Math. , 150:1159–1175, 1999. arXiv:math/9911265

  36. [44]

    A. Joye. Random time-dependent quantum walks. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 307(1):65, Jul 2011. arXiv:1010.4006

  37. [45]

    A. Joye. Dynamical localization for d-dimensional random quantum walks.Quantum Inf. Process. , 11:1251–1269, 2012. arXiv:1201.4759

  38. [46]

    Joye and M

    A. Joye and M. Merkli. Dynamical localization of quantum walks in random environments.J. Stat. Phys. , 140(6):1–29,

  39. [47]

    P. L. Krapivsky, J. M. Luck, and K. Mallick. Interacting quantum walkers: two-body bosonic and fermionic bound states. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 48(47):475301, 2015. arXiv:1507.01363

  40. [48]

    R. B. Laughlin. Quantized Hall conductivity in two dimensions.Phys. Rev. B , 23(10):5632, 1981

  41. [49]

    Linden and J

    N. Linden and J. Sharam. Inhomogeneous quantum walks.Phys. Rev. A , 80(5):052327, 2009. arXiv:0906.3692

  42. [50]

    N. B. Lovett, S. Cooper, M. Everitt, M. Trevers, and V. Kendon. Universal quantum computation using the discrete-time quantum walk. Phys. Rev. A , 81:042330, 2010. arXiv:0910.1024

  43. [51]

    Marx and S

    C. Marx and S. Jitomirskaya. Dynamics and spectral theory of quasi-periodic Schrödinger-type operators.Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst., 37:2353–2393, 2017.arXiv:1503.05740

  44. [52]

    L. A. Pastur. Spectral properties of disordered systems in the one-body approximation.Commun. Math. Phys., 75(2):179– 196, 1980

  45. [53]

    Portugal

    R. Portugal. Quantum Walks and Search Algorithms . Springer, 2018

  46. [54]

    Rieffel.C ∗-algebras associated with irrational rotations.Pac

    M. Rieffel.C ∗-algebras associated with irrational rotations.Pac. J. Math. , 93(2):415–429, 1981

  47. [55]

    Shikano and H

    Y. Shikano and H. Katsura. Localization and fractality in inhomogeneous quantum walks with self-duality.Phys. Rev. E , 82(3):031122, 2010. arXiv:1004.5394

  48. [56]

    Shikano and H

    Y. Shikano and H. Katsura. Notes on inhomogeneous quantum walks. AIP Conf. Proc. , 1363(1):151–154, 2011. arXiv:1104.2010

  49. [57]

    M. Shubin. Discrete magnetic laplacian.Commun. Math. Phys. , 164(2):259–275, 1994

  50. [58]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. Den Nijs. Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49(6):405, 1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.