Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 294 references

Dynamics and Transport at the Threshold of Many-Body Localization

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that nearly MBL systems—too disordered to thermalize quickly but not strictly localized—are unified by a common mechanism: approximately conserved l-bits coupled to sparse, slowly relaxing thermal regions.

desk verdict A careful, honest review that maps nearly-MBL physics onto a speculative bath picture; the quasiperiodic case is the obvious soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10435 v1 pith:LA26PFBB submitted 2019-08-27 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Sarang Gopalakrishnan , S.A. Parameswaran This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords many-bodylocalizationnearlyMBLsystemsl-bitsavalancheinstabilityGriffithseffectssubdiffusionslowthermalizationFloquetprethermalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the many systems that are 'nearly' many-body localized—too disordered to thermalize quickly, but not meeting the stringent conditions for true localization—share a common skeleton: approximately localized degrees of freedom (l-bits) coupled to rare, slow regions that act as a heat bath. It claims that once this skeleton is assumed, subdiffusive transport, anomalously slow entanglement growth, 1/f noise, fragility of linear response, and exponentially slow heating in driven systems are consequences of the same mechanism, not separate accidents. The authors assemble evidence across four families: thermal systems near the transition, systems whose symmetry or dimensionality forbids localization, multi-component systems with mixed localized and thermal parts, and periodically driven systems. The payoff is a testable, unified account of why equilibration rates can be far slower than microscopic timescales in a broad class of experiments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the l-bit (local integral of motion), a dressed, approximately conserved spin that exists in typical regions of a strongly disordered system; in true MBL the l-bits remain quasilocal forever, while in nearly MBL systems they are coupled to rare thermal regions. The load-bearing mechanism is the avalanche: a thermal inclusion of sufficient size absorbs neighboring l-bits one by one, growing and eventually thermalizing the whole system, at a rate set by comparing the matrix element to the thermal block's level spacing. The review uses this coupling of l-bits to sparse baths, formalized in strong-randomness renormalization schemes of the MBL transition, to organize the dynamics of all nearly MBL systems it treats.

What would settle it

Compute the growth of a single thermal inclusion coupled to a quasiperiodic (rather than random) l-bit chain at sizes where the avalanche threshold should be crossed; if the inclusion remains localized and no thermal avalanche propagates, the review's blanket assumption that all apparent instabilities lead to thermalization is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that strict MBL is a special case, and the more common phenomenon is 'nearly MBL' behavior in systems that eventually thermalize (or heat up) but only after extraordinarily long times. It proposes that these systems are described by an effective picture of approximately conserved local operators (l-bits, which are dressed spins that act as nearly conserved integrals of motion) coupled to sparse thermal inclusions. The thermal inclusions are not ordinary baths: they are small, slow, or spatially heterogeneous, which is why transport is anomalous, e.g., subdiffusion with a continuously varying exponent, entanglement growth as a sublinear power law rather than linear, and low-frequency noise approaching 1/f. The review explicitly assumes that every apparent instability of the localized phase leads to thermalization unless there are clear reasons to think otherwise, and on that assumption constructs a unified phenomenology that applies across disordered, quasiperiodic, multi-component, and driven systems.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise, stated in Sec. 1.1, is that every apparent instability of the localized phase actually leads to thermalization unless there are specific theoretical reasons to believe otherwise—a premise the authors themselves call speculative, since numerical evidence for these instabilities is often weak or nonexistent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A system showing slow, MBL-like signatures on experimental timescales need not be truly MBL; the same signatures can arise from l-bits coupled to rare sluggish regions, so observing them does not by itself prove the existence of an MBL phase.
  • On the thermal side of the MBL transition, the review predicts a Griffiths phase with subdiffusion, continuously varying exponents, and 1/f noise, with the subdiffusive exponent vanishing as the transition is approached.
  • In the MBL phase itself, generic response functions should follow power laws in frequency whose exponents flow toward 1/f near the transition, and the limit of zero frequency and the limit of linear response should not commute.
  • Systems constrained to thermalize by continuous non-Abelian symmetry, dimensionality, or long-range interactions can still show MBL-like phenomenology for exponentially long times, and driven Floquet systems can heat to infinite temperature only exponentially slowly.
  • The MBL transition in random one-dimensional systems is controlled by a Kosterlitz-Thouless-like renormalization-group flow of thermal fraction and localization length, implying a diverging length scale and correspondingly slow finite-size scaling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the avalanche picture is generic, strict MBL is a fragile one-dimensional, short-range phenomenon, and experiments on larger, higher-dimensional, or quasiperiodic systems should ultimately see thermalization on sufficiently long timescales; the review stops short of predicting those timescales for realistic experimental systems.
  • The unifying picture suggests that nearly MBL physics is controlled more by the density, size distribution, and spectral slowness of thermal regions than by the microscopic origin of disorder, which could be tested by comparing random and quasiperiodic systems with matched thermal-region statistics.
  • The explicit assumption that all apparent instabilities thermalize could be probed by measuring autocorrelation functions and eigenstate entanglement in quasiperiodic one-dimensional systems at sizes beyond current numerical reach; if a finite fraction of eigenstates persists with area-law entanglement there, the unified picture would require revision.
  • Because the 'bath' in the review is often itself far from thermal equilibrium, a more complete theory may need to assign different effective temperatures to different families of l-bits, an extension the review does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of dynamics and transport in nearly many-body-localized (MBL) systems, organized around a unifying claim: such systems are best viewed as approximately localized degrees of freedom coupled to a sparse, slowly relaxing set of thermal regions, i.e., self-generated or externally imposed baths. After introducing the l-bit description and the avalanche instability in Sec. 1, the review covers disordered and quasiperiodic systems on the thermal side of the MBL transition, symmetry- and dimensionality-constrained systems, coupled MBL-bath and multi-component systems, driven and prethermal systems, common dynamical signatures, and available numerical/theoretical methods. The authors are unusually transparent: Sec. 1.1 explicitly labels the central organizing assumption as 'admittedly speculative' and notes that numerical evidence for the relevant instabilities is 'weak or nonexistent.' The review is best read as a strongly argued research program or perspective rather than as a collection of established results.

Significance. If the unifying bath picture is correct, the review would tie together several seemingly distinct phenomena—subdiffusive transport, slow entanglement growth, 1/f noise, and exponentially slow heating in driven systems—as manifestations of localized l-bits interacting with rare, sluggish thermal regions. The paper also provides a useful catalog of recent RG schemes, spectral-function arguments, and numerical methods, and it explicitly enumerates open questions. The authors deserve credit for stating their central assumption plainly and for not overclaiming numerical support. However, the significance is conditional: the abstract's 'common theme' is asserted more strongly than the body's own caveats allow, and the quasiperiodic case, which occupies a central place in the narrative, lacks even a suggested microscopic construction of the required baths.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 1.1] The abstract states the 'common theme' as an organizing conclusion: 'A theme common to many of these problems is that they can be understood in terms of approximately localized degrees of freedom coupled to a heat bath (or baths) consisting of thermal degrees of freedom.' Yet Sec. 1.1 characterizes the same statement as an explicit assumption that is 'admittedly speculative' and notes that 'by and large the numerical evidence for these instabilities is weak or nonexistent.' Because every later estimate of thermalization rates inherits this assumption, the manuscript should clearly mark the unified bath picture as a conjecture in the abstract and introduction, and should state which subsequent quantitative claims (e.g., avalanche thresholds, Griffiths exponents, prethermal heating rates) are conditional on it. As written, the abstract's level of certainty exceeds what the body supports.
  2. [Sec. 2.2.1 and Sec. 2.2.2] This is the load-bearing weak point for the claimed universality. The text correctly explains that quasiperiodic hyperuniformity forbids the usual Griffiths rare regions, and then, when proposing 'spectator spins' or state-dependent rare configurations as the thermal bath, concedes that 'no explicit construction of these baths exists.' It also notes that that scenario implies a many-body mobility edge, which the review elsewhere is inclined to reject. If quasiperiodic MBL is in fact stable, or if its transition is controlled by typical-region resonances, then the quasiperiodic class is an entire counterexample to the unified bath paradigm. The manuscript should either provide a concrete microscopic construction for the quasiperiodic bath or explicitly present the quasiperiodic bath idea as an open, speculative scenario with a proposed numerical or experimental discriminator (e.g., the presence or absence of a many-body mobility edge, or the scaling of transport exponents with system size). At minimum, the abstract and Sec. 1.1 should be qualified so that quasiperiodic systems are not swept into the 'common theme' without a caveat.
  3. [Sec. 1.2.3 and Sec. 1.5] The avalanche criterion and the critical localization length ξc = log 2/2 are derived by modeling the thermal region as a featureless random matrix even after it has absorbed many localized spins. The paper itself acknowledges that this 'clearly cannot be strictly true' and appeals to toy-model numerics for support. Since this estimate underlies the KT-type RG of Sec. 1.5 and the instability claims for higher-dimensional and long-range-interacting systems in Sec. 3, the authors should either quantify the expected corrections to the random-matrix ansatz (for example, the effect of slow modes in the absorbed block) or explicitly label the avalanche criterion as a heuristic whose numerical support is limited to the special coupling structure of Ref. [27]. The honesty of the caveat is appreciated, but a review article should not leave a load-bearing numerical estimate without a stated range of validity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical errors that should be corrected in revision: 'reallty' in Sec. 3.1, 'noot' and 'Jorrdan' in the Sec. 3.2.3 discussion, 'pertrubation' near the SDRG description, 'terminii' in the Fig. 4 caption, and inconsistent accent rendering of 'Rényi.'
  2. [Sec. 2.1.1 and Sec. 2.2.2 footnotes] Two citations are to unpublished or in-preparation work: 'A. Scardicchio et al., in preparation' in Sec. 2.1.1 and 'V. Khemani, unpublished' in the Sec. 2.2.2 footnote. These should be replaced by published preprints or removed, since a review article should not rest claims on unverifiable sources.
  3. [Sec. 1.4.3 and Eq. (8)] The notation for the spectral function is inconsistent: Eq. (8) uses f_T(ω), while the surrounding text defines f_E(ω). Please unify the notation and define the argument clearly.
  4. [Sec. 1.4.4] The phrase '1 /A' appears with an unusual space; this is presumably the inverse drive amplitude 1/A. Please fix the typesetting throughout the paragraph.
  5. [Sec. 2.2.1] The term 'hyperuniform' is used in a central argument but is not defined in the text; a brief parenthetical definition or a glossary entry would make the section accessible to readers outside the localization community.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the unifying bath picture is an explicitly labeled speculative organizing premise, not a derived prediction; no equation in the review reduces to its own input.

full rationale

This is a review whose claimed contribution is a unified perspective: nearly-MBL systems can be viewed as localized degrees of freedom coupled to sparse, slowly relaxing thermal regions. The paper nowhere derives one of its central equations from another equation in the same paper, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The organizing premise is stated openly in Sec. 1.1: "we shall assume all apparent instabilities of the localized phase lead to thermalization, unless there are specific theoretical reasons to believe otherwise," and the same paragraph concedes "these instabilities are admittedly speculative" and that numerical evidence is "weak or nonexistent." Choosing a speculative assumption because "this assumption leads to concrete predictions" is a methodological choice flagged as such, not a hidden reduction of output to input. The avalanche arguments in Sec. 1.2.3 are quoted from prior work (Refs. [26,27]) and are presented as such, rather than being rederived as the paper's own prediction; the quasiperiodic discussion explicitly notes a gap ("No explicit construction of these baths exists"), which is the opposite of a self-fulfilling derivation. Self-citations appear (e.g., low-frequency l-bit response), but they are used as literature summaries and are not invoked to forbid alternatives. Concerns about whether the avalanche picture extends to quasiperiodic systems in d>1, or whether the Griffiths phase is fully thermal, are falsifiability/correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no fitted parameters and no new postulated entities. It does rely on several background assumptions, most notably the explicitly speculative rule that all instabilities thermalize, and on the featureless-bath approximation in the avalanche argument. These are stated in Secs. 1.1 and 1.2.3.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Imbrie's theorem: for sufficiently small interactions, one-dimensional short-range random spin chains have a complete set of quasilocal integrals of motion.
    Cited in Sec. 1.2.1 as the rigorous basis for the MBL phase in the restricted class of models.
  • domain assumption The eigenstate thermalization hypothesis applies in the thermal phase and provides the baseline for comparison.
    Assumed throughout, especially in Sec. 1.3.2 and Sec. 2.1.3, when discussing deviations from thermal behavior.
  • ad hoc to paper The absorbing bath can be treated as a featureless random matrix even after it has absorbed many localized spins.
    The paper itself flags this in Sec. 1.2.3 as an obvious objection to the avalanche estimate; it is a modeling assumption rather than a proven statement.
  • domain assumption A quasiperiodic MBL phase exists even though no Imbrie-type proof is available.
    Sec. 2.2 states that the existence of quasiperiodic MBL is not proven, but the review proceeds on the assumption that it exists.
  • ad hoc to paper All apparent instabilities of the localized phase lead to thermalization unless there are specific theoretical reasons otherwise.
    Sec. 1.1 explicitly declares this the central working assumption of the review and admits that numerical support is weak or nonexistent.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamics and Transport at the Threshold of Many-Body Localization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LA26PFBB

@misc{pith2026190810435,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamics and Transport at the Threshold of Many-Body Localization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LA26PFBB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10435}
}
read the original abstract

Many-body localized (MBL) systems do not approach thermal equilibrium under their intrinsic dynamics; MBL and conventional thermalizing systems form distinct dynamical phases of matter, separated by a phase transition at which equilibrium statistical mechanics breaks down. True MBL is known to occur only under certain stringent conditions for perfectly isolated one-dimensional systems, with Hamiltonians that have strictly short-range interactions and lack any continuous non-Abelian symmetries. However, in practice, even systems that are not strictly MBL can be nearly MBL, with equilibration rates that are far slower than their other intrinsic timescales; thus, anomalously slow relaxation occurs in a much broader class of systems than strict MBL. In this review we address transport and dynamics in such nearly-MBL systems from a unified perspective. Our discussion covers various classes of such systems: (i) disordered and quasiperiodic systems on the thermal side of the MBL-thermal transition; (ii) systems that are strongly disordered, but obstructed from localizing because of symmetry, interaction range, or dimensionality; (iii) multiple-component systems, in which some components would in isolation be MBL but others are not; and finally (iv) driven systems whose dynamics lead to exponentially slow rates of heating to infinite temperature. A theme common to many of these problems is that they can be understood in terms of approximately localized degrees of freedom coupled to a heat bath (or baths) consisting of thermal degrees of freedom; however, this putative bath is itself nontrivial, being either small or very slowly relaxing. We discuss anomalous transport, diverging relaxation times, and other signatures of the proximity to MBL in these systems. We also survey recent theoretical and numerical methods that have been applied to study dynamics on either side of the MBL transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.10435 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Spectral functions in the MBL phase. Left: “spectral tree” construction of the thermally averaged local spectral function. At higher levels of the tree, the couplings to increasingly distant neighbors are included. The structure of the tree is self-similar, with gaps at all energy scales (of which the smaller ones are resolution-limited). Right: “Mott” mechanism for low-frequency divergences in generic spectral func… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kosterlitz-Thouless RG flow proposed to capture the ‘quantum avalanche’ mechanism of the MBL-ETH transition, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic eigenstate phase diagram of the 1D quantum clock model, characterized by non-Abelian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic eigenstate phase diagram of the random-bond XXZ chain, characterized by non-Abelian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution with temperature of the thermal (left) and charge (right) conductivity of the disordered SILL, reproduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relaxation of local operators or autocorrelation functions in unstable MBL systems with short-range (left) and power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Luitz D J, Huveneers F m c and De Roeck W 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(15) 150602 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.150602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.150602 2017

  2. [1]

    Bohigas O, Giannoni M J and Schmit C 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52(1) 1–4 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.1 1984

  3. [2]

    org/10.1088%2F0305-4470%2F10%2F12%2F016

    Berry M V 1977 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 10 2083–2091 URL https://doi. org/10.1088%2F0305-4470%2F10%2F12%2F016

    1977

  4. [3]

    Jensen R V and Shankar R 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54(17) 1879–1882 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1879

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.1879 1985

  5. [4]

    Deutsch J M 1991 Phys. Rev. A 43 2046–2049

    1991

  6. [5]

    Srednicki M 1994 Phys. Rev. E 50 888–901

    1994

  7. [6]

    Jarzynski C 1997 Phys. Rev. E 56(2) 2254–2256 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevE.56.2254

    1997

  8. [7]

    Rigol M, Dunjko V and Olshanii M 2008 Nature (London) 452 854–858 URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature06838

    doi:10.1038/nature06838 2008

Show all 294 references
  1. [8]

    Polkovnikov A, Sengupta K, Silva A and Vengalattore M 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 863–883

    2011

  2. [9]

    Harlow D and Hayden P 2013 Journal of High Energy Physics 2013 85 ISSN 1029-8479 URL https: //doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2013)085

    2013 doi

  3. [10]

    Barb´ on J L F and Mag´ an J M 2011Phys. Rev. D 84(10) 106012 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.106012

    doi

  4. [11]

    Lashkari N, Stanford D, Hastings M, Osborne T and Hayden P 2013 Journal of High Energy Physics 2013 22 ISSN 1029-8479 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2013)022

    2013 doi

  5. [12]

    Shenker S H and Stanford D 2014 Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 67 ISSN 1029-8479 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2014)067

    2014 doi

  6. [13]

    Maldacena J, Shenker S H and Stanford D 2016 Journal of High Energy Physics 2016 106 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)106

    2016 doi

  7. [14]

    nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7086/full/nature04693.html

    Kinoshita T, Wenger T and Weiss D S 2006 Nature 440 900–903 ISSN 0028-0836 URL http://www. nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7086/full/nature04693.html

    2006

  8. [15]

    2010 Science 327 177–180

    Coldea R et al. 2010 Science 327 177–180

    2010

  9. [16]

    2011 Nature 472 307?312

    Simon J et al. 2011 Nature 472 307?312

    2011

  10. [17]

    Gring M, Kuhnert M, Langen T, Kitagawa T, Rauer B, Schreitl M, Mazets I, Smith D A, Demler E and Schmiedmayer J 2012 Science 337 1318–1322

    2012

  11. [18]

    Erne S, B¨ ucker R, Gasenzer T, Berges J and Schmiedmayer J 2018 Nature 563 225

    2018

  12. [19]

    Tang Y, Kao W, Li K Y, Seo S, Mallayya K, Rigol M, Gopalakrishnan S and Lev B L 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8(2) 021030 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021030

    2018 doi

  13. [20]

    Basko D, Aleiner I and Altshuler B 2006 Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 321 1126–1205 ISSN 0003-4916 URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491605002630

    2006

  14. [21]

    Nandkishore R and Huse D A 2015 Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter 6 15–38 URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014726

    2015 doi

  15. [22]

    Altman E and Vosk R 2015 Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6 383–409

    2015

  16. [23]

    Abanin D A, Altman E, Bloch I and Serbyn M 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91(2) 021001 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.021001

    2019 doi

  17. [24]

    Imbrie J Z 2016 Journal of Statistical Physics 163 998–1048

    2016

  18. [25]

    De Roeck W, Huveneers F, M¨ uller M and Schiulaz M 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93(1) 014203 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.014203 71

    2016 doi

  19. [26]

    De Roeck W and Huveneers F m c 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95(15) 155129 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155129

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Papi´ c Z, Stoudenmire E M and Abanin D A 2015 Annals of Physics 362 714–725

    2015

  21. [29]

    Basko D M, Aleiner I L and Altshuler B L 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76(5) 052203 URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.052203

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    Nandkishore R, Gopalakrishnan S and Huse D A 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90(6) 064203 URL http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.064203

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.201600302

    Parameswaran S A, Potter A C and Vasseur R 2017Annalen der Physik 529 1600302 (Preprint https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.201600302) URL https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.201600302

    doi

  24. [32]

    wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.201600350

    Luitz D J and Lev Y B 2017 Annalen der Physik 529 1600350 ( Preprint https: //onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.201600350) URL https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.201600350

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    Vasseur R and Moore J E 2016 Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016 064010

    2016

  26. [34]

    201600326) URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.201600326

    Agarwal K, Altman E, Demler E, Gopalakrishnan S, Huse D A and Knap M 2017 Annalen der Physik 529 1600326 ( Preprint https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp. 201600326) URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.201600326

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    2017 Annalen der Physik 529 1600362 (Preprint https://onlinelibrary.wiley

    Prelovsek P et al. 2017 Annalen der Physik 529 1600362 (Preprint https://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.201600362) URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/andp.201600362

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    Imbrie J Z, Ros V and Scardicchio A 2017 Annalen der Physik 529 1600278

    2017

  29. [37]

    De Roeck W and Imbrie J Z 2017 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 375 20160422

    2017

  30. [38]

    Ponte P, Laumann C, Huse D A and Chandran A 2017 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375 20160428

    2017

  31. [39]

    ˇSuntajs J, Bonˇ ca J, Prosen T and Vidmar L 2019arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.06345

    1905 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Bukov M, D’Alessio L and Polkovnikov A 2015 Adv. Phys. 64 139–226

    2015

  33. [41]

    Kuwahara T, Mori T and Saito K 2016 Annals of Physics 367 96–124

    2016

  34. [42]

    Moessner R and Sondhi S L 2017 Nature Physics 13 424

    2017

  35. [43]

    D’Alessio L and Polkovnikov A 2013 Annals of Physics 333 19–33

    2013

  36. [44]

    Iyer S, Oganesyan V, Refael G and Huse D A 2013 Physical Review B 87 134202

    2013

  37. [45]

    Ponte P, Chandran A, Papi´ c Z and Abanin D A 2015 Annals of Physics 353 196–204

    2015

  38. [46]

    Abanin D A, De Roeck W and Huveneers F 2016 Annals of Physics 372 1–11

    2016

  39. [47]

    Zhang L, Khemani V and Huse D A 2016 Physical Review B 94 224202

    2016

  40. [48]

    Bordia P, L¨ uschen H, Schneider U, Knap M and Bloch I 2017 Nature Physics 13 460

    2017

  41. [49]

    Imbrie J Z 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(2) 027201 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.027201

    2016

  42. [50]

    Huse D A, Nandkishore R and Oganesyan V 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 174202

    2014

  43. [51]

    Serbyn M, Papi´ c Z and Abanin D A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 127201

    2013

  44. [52]

    Varma V K, Raj A, Gopalakrishnan S, Oganesyan V and Pekker D 2019 arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02902

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Mozgunov E 2017 arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.08069

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Bauer B and Nayak C 2013 J. Stat. Mech. 2013 P09005

    2013

  47. [55]

    Fleishman L and Anderson P W 1980 Phys. Rev. B 21(6) 2366–2377 URL http://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.21.2366

    1980 doi

  48. [56]

    Altshuler B L, Gefen Y, Kamenev A and Levitov L S 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2803–2806

    1997

  49. [57]

    Berkovits R and Avishai Y 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(3) 568–571 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.568

    1998 doi

  50. [58]

    Monthus C and Garel T 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 134202 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.81.134202

    2010

  51. [59]

    De Luca A, Altshuler B L, Kravtsov V E and Scardicchio A 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(4) 046806 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.046806

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    Beaud V and Warzel S 2017 Low-energy fock-space localization for attractive hard-core particles in 72 disorder Annales Henri Poincar´ evol 18 (Springer) pp 3143–3166

    2017

  53. [61]

    Logan D E and Welsh S 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(4) 045131 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.99.045131

    2019

  54. [62]

    Kramer B and MacKinnon A 1993 Rep. Prog. Phys. 56 1469

    1993

  55. [64]

    Basko D 2011 Annals of Physics 326 1577–1655

    2011

  56. [65]

    Potirniche I D, Banerjee S and Altman E 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(20) 205149 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.205149

    2019 doi

  57. [66]

    Shklovskii B I and Efros A L 2013 Electronic properties of doped semiconductors vol 45 (Springer Science & Business Media)

    2013

  58. [67]

    Pollak M, Ortu˜ no M and Frydman A 2013The electron glass (Cambridge University Press)

  59. [68]

    Thorsmølle V K and Armitage N P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(8) 086601 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.086601

    2010 doi

  60. [69]

    Mott N F 1968 Phil. Mag. 170 1259–1268

    1968

  61. [70]

    Sivan U and Imry Y 1987 Phys. Rev. B 35(12) 6074–6083 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.35.6074

    1987

  62. [71]

    Altshuler B L, Gefen Y, Kamenev A and Levitov L S 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(14) 2803–2806 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2803

    1997 doi

  63. [72]

    Sivan U, Milliken F, Milkove K, Rishton S, Lee Y, Hong J, Boegli V, Kern D and DeFranza M 1994 EPL (Europhysics Letters) 25 605

    1994

  64. [73]

    Sivan U, Imry Y and Aronov A 1994 EPL (Europhysics Letters) 28 115

    1994

  65. [74]

    Mirlin A D and Fyodorov Y V 1997 Phys. Rev. B 56(20) 13393–13404 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.13393

    1997 doi

  66. [75]

    Abou-Chacra R, Thouless D and Anderson P 1973 Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 6 1734

    1973

  67. [76]

    Chalker J and Siak S 1990 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2 2671

    1990

  68. [77]

    Klein A 1998 Advances in Mathematics 133 163–184

    1998

  69. [78]

    Derrida B and Rodgers G 1993 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26 L457

    1993

  70. [79]

    Gornyi I V, Mirlin A D and Polyakov D G 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93(12) 125419 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.125419

    2016 doi

  71. [80]

    Pino M, Kravtsov V E, Altshuler B L and Ioffe L B 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96(21) 214205 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.214205

    2017 doi

  72. [81]

    Altshuler B L, Cuevas E, Ioffe L B and Kravtsov V E 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(15) 156601 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.156601

    2016 doi

  73. [82]

    Biroli G and Tarzia M 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96(20) 201114 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.96.201114

    2017

  74. [83]

    Laumann C R, Pal A and Scardicchio A 2014 arXiv:1404.2276 URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1404. 2276

    2014 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Sachdev S and Ye J 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70(21) 3339–3342 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.70.3339

    1993

  76. [85]

    Banerjee S and Altman E 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95(13) 134302 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.95.134302

    2017

  77. [87]

    Feher G and Gere E A 1959 Phys. Rev. 114(5) 1245–1256 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRev.114.1245

    1959

  78. [88]

    Zhang W and Cory D G 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 1324–1327 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.80.1324

    1998

  79. [89]

    Klauder J R and Anderson P W 1962 Phys. Rev. 125(3) 912–932 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRev.125.912

    1962 doi

  80. [90]

    Portis A M 1956 Phys. Rev. 104(3) 584–588 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev. 104.584

    1956 doi

  81. [91]

    Ghosh S, Parthasarathy R, Rosenbaum T and Aeppli G 2002 Science 296 2195–2198

    2002

  82. [92]

    Ghosh S, Rosenbaum T F and Aeppli G 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(15) 157205 URL https://link. 73 aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.157205

    2008 doi

  83. [93]

    Silevitch D, Tang C, Aeppli G and Rosenbaum T 2017 arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.04952

    2017 arXiv

  84. [94]

    Doherty M W, Manson N B, Delaney P, Jelezko F, Wrachtrup J and Hollenberg L C L 2013 Phys. Rep. 528 1–45

    2013

  85. [95]

    Choi J, Choi S, Kucsko G, Maurer P C, Shields B J, Sumiya H, Onoda S, Isoya J, Demler E, Jelezko F, Yao N Y and Lukin M D 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(9) 093601 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.093601

    2017 doi

  86. [96]

    Kucsko G, Choi S, Choi J, Maurer P C, Zhou H, Landig R, Sumiya H, Onoda S, Isoya J, Jelezko F, Demler E, Yao N Y and Lukin M D 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(2) 023601 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.023601

    2018 doi

  87. [97]

    M¨ uller C, Cole J H and Lisenfeld J 2017 arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.01108

    2017 arXiv

  88. [98]

    Esquinazi P 2013 Tunneling systems in amorphous and crystalline solids (Springer Science & Business Media)

    2013

  89. [99]

    Faoro L and Ioffe L B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 157005 (Preprint 1201.5299)

    2012 arXiv

  90. [100]

    Faoro L and Ioffe L B 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 014201 (Preprint 1404.2410)

    2015 arXiv

  91. [101]

    Black J L and Halperin B I 1977 Phys. Rev. B 16(6) 2879–2895 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.2879

    1977 doi

  92. [102]

    Burin A L, Kagan Y, Maksimov L A and Polishchuk I Y 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(13) 2945–2948 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2945

    1998 doi

  93. [103]

    Kagan Y and Maksimov L 1983 Zh Eksp I Teor Fiz 84 792–810

    1983

  94. [104]

    Kagan Y and Maksimov L 1984 Zhurnal Eksperimental?noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki 87 348–365

    1984

  95. [105]

    Greiner M, Mandel O, H¨ ansch T W and Bloch I 2002 Nature 419 51–54

    2002

  96. [106]

    Sanchez-Palencia L, Cl´ ement D, Lugan P, Bouyer P, Shlyapnikov G V and Aspect A 2007 Physical Review Letters 98 210401

    2007

  97. [107]

    Billy J, Josse V, Zuo Z, Bernard A, Hambrecht B, Lugan P, Cl´ ement D, Sanchez-Palencia L, Bouyer P and Aspect A 2008 Nature 453 891

    2008

  98. [108]

    Jendrzejewski F, Bernard A, Mueller K, Cheinet P, Josse V, Piraud M, Pezz´ e L, Sanchez-Palencia L, Aspect A and Bouyer P 2012 Nature Physics 8 398

    2012

  99. [109]

    Roati G, D?Errico C, Fallani L, Fattori M, Fort C, Zaccanti M, Modugno G, Modugno M and Inguscio M 2008 Nature 453 895

    2008

  100. [110]

    Modugno G 2010 Reports on Progress in Physics 73 102401

    2010

  101. [111]

    Semeghini G, Landini M, Castilho P, Roy S, Spagnolli G, Trenkwalder A, Fattori M, Inguscio M and Modugno G 2015 Nature Physics 11 554

    2015

  102. [112]

    Kollath C, L¨ auchli A M and Altman E 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 180601–4 URL http://link.aps. org/abstract/PRL/v98/e180601

    2007

  103. [113]

    Eckstein M, Kollar M and Werner P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 056403

    2009

  104. [114]

    Bernier J S, Roux G and Kollath C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(20) 200601 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.200601

    2011 doi

  105. [115]

    Strohmaier N, Greif D, J¨ ordens R, Tarruell L, Moritz H, Esslinger T, Sensarma R, Pekker D, Alt- man E and Demler E 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 080401 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.104.080401

    2010

  106. [116]

    Pinto R A, Haque M and Flach S 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79(5) 052118 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.052118

    2009 doi

  107. [117]

    Abanin D A, De Roeck W, Ho W W and Huveneers F m c 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95(1) 014112 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.014112

    2017 doi

  108. [118]

    Kondov S S, McGehee W R, Xu W and DeMarco B 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(8) 083002 URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.083002

    2015 doi

  109. [119]

    abstract

    Schreiber M, Hodgman S S, Bordia P, L¨ uschen H P, Fischer M H, Vosk R, Altman E, Schneider U and Bloch I 2015 Science 349 842–845 URL http://www.sciencemag.org/content/349/6250/842. abstract

    2015

  110. [120]

    Choi J y, Hild S, Zeiher J, Schauß P, Rubio-Abadal A, Yefsah T, Khemani V, Huse D A, Bloch I and Gross C 2016 Science 352 1547–1552 ISSN 0036-8075 URL http://science.sciencemag.org/ content/352/6293/1547

    2016

  111. [121]

    Bordia P, L¨ uschen H P, Hodgman S S, Schreiber M, Bloch I and Schneider U 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 116(14) 140401 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.140401

    2016 doi

  112. [122]

    Bordia P, L¨ uschen H, Scherg S, Gopalakrishnan S, Knap M, Schneider U and Bloch I 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7(4) 041047 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041047

    2017 doi

  113. [123]

    org/abs/1607.07868

    Bordia P, L¨ uschen H, Schneider U, Knap M and Bloch I 2016arXiv:1607.07868 URL http://arxiv. org/abs/1607.07868

    arXiv

  114. [124]

    L¨ uschen H P, Bordia P, Hodgman S S, Schreiber M, Sarkar S, Daley A J, Fischer M H, Altman E, Bloch I and Schneider U 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7(1) 011034 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevX.7.011034

    2017

  115. [125]

    Rubio-Abadal A, Choi J y, Zeiher J, Hollerith S, Rui J, Bloch I and Gross C 2018 arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00056

    2018 arXiv

  116. [126]

    Kohlert T, Scherg S, Li X, L¨ uschen H P, Das Sarma S, Bloch I and Aidelsburger M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(17) 170403 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.170403

    2019 doi

  117. [127]

    Bakr W S, Gillen J I, Peng A, F¨ olling S and Greiner M 2009 Nature 462 74–77 ISSN 0028-0836 URL http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7269/full/nature08482.html

    2009

  118. [128]

    Sherson J F, Weitenberg C, Endres M, Cheneau M, Bloch I and Kuhr S 2010 Nature 467 68–72 ISSN 0028-0836 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09378

    2010 doi

  119. [129]

    Lukin A, Rispoli M, Schittko R, Tai M E, Kaufman A M, Choi S, Khemani V, L´ eonard J and Greiner M 2019 Science 364 256–260

    2019

  120. [130]

    Islam R, Ma R, Preiss P M, Eric Tai M, Lukin A, Rispoli M and Greiner M 2015 Nature 528 77–83

    2015

  121. [131]

    Smith J, Lee A, Richerme P, Neyenhuis B, Hess P W, Hauke P, Heyl M, Huse D A and Monroe C 2016 Nature Physics 12 907

    2016

  122. [132]

    Morningstar A and Huse D A 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(22) 224205 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224205

    2019 doi

  123. [133]

    Anderson P W, Thouless D J, Abrahams E and Fisher D S 1980 Phys. Rev. B 22(8) 3519–3526 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.22.3519

    1980 doi

  124. [134]

    ˇZnidariˇ c M, Prosen T and Prelovˇ sek P 2008Phys. Rev. B 77 064426 URL http://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.064426

    doi

  125. [135]

    Bardarson J H, Pollmann F and Moore J E 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 017202 URL http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.017202

    2012 doi

  126. [136]

    Serbyn M, Papi´ c Z and Abanin D A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 260601

    2013

  127. [137]

    Serbyn M, Papi´ c Z and Abanin D A 2014Phys. Rev. B 90(17) 174302 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.174302

    doi

  128. [138]

    Deng D L, Li X, Pixley J H, Wu Y L and Das Sarma S 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95(2) 024202 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.024202

    2017 doi

  129. [139]

    Serbyn M, Knap M, Gopalakrishnan S, Papi´ c Z, Yao N Y, Laumann C R, Abanin D A, Lukin M D and Demler E A 2014 arXiv:1403.0693 URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.0693

    2014 arXiv

  130. [140]

    Vasseur R, Parameswaran S A and Moore J E 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91(14) 140202 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.140202

    2015 doi

  131. [141]

    Gopalakrishnan S, M¨ uller M, Khemani V, Knap M, Demler E and Huse D A 2015Phys. Rev. B 92(10) 104202 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.104202

    doi

  132. [142]

    Gopalakrishnan S, Knap M and Demler E 2016 arXiv:1603.04448 URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1603. 04448

    2016 arXiv

  133. [143]

    Ponte P, Papi´ c Z, Huveneers F and Abanin D A 2015 Physical review letters 114 140401

    2015

  134. [144]

    Khemani V, Nandkishore R and Sondhi S L 2015 Nature Physics 11 560

    2015

  135. [145]

    Ovadia M, Kalok D, Tamir I, Mitra S, Sac´ ep´ e B and Shahar D 2015Scientific reports 5 13503

  136. [146]

    Tamir I, Levinson T, Gorniaczyk F, Doron A, Lieb J and Shahar D 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(3) 035135 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.035135

    2019 doi

  137. [147]

    Vosk R, Huse D A and Altman E 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5(3) 031032 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031032

    2015 doi

  138. [148]

    Potter A C, Vasseur R and Parameswaran S A 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5(3) 031033 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031033

    2015 doi

  139. [149]

    Dumitrescu P T, Vasseur R and Potter A C 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(11) 110604 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.110604

    2017 doi

  140. [150]

    Thiery T, Huveneers F m c, M¨ uller M and De Roeck W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(14) 140601 URL 75 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.140601

    2018 doi

  141. [151]

    Zhang L, Zhao B, Devakul T and Huse D A 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93(22) 224201 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.224201

    2016 doi

  142. [152]

    Goremykina A, Vasseur R and Serbyn M 2018 arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.04285

    2018 arXiv

  143. [153]

    Dumitrescu P T, Parameswaran S A, Goremykina A, Serbyn M and Vasseur R 2018 arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03103

    2018 arXiv

  144. [154]

    Kosterlitz J M and Thouless D J 1973 Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 6 1181

    1973

  145. [155]

    Gopalakrishnan S, Agarwal K, Demler E A, Huse D A and Knap M 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 134206

    2016

  146. [156]

    Bar Lev Y, Cohen G and Reichman D R 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(10) 100601

    2015

  147. [157]

    Agarwal K, Gopalakrishnan S, Knap M, M¨ uller M and Demler E 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 160401

    2015

  148. [158]

    Jonay C, Huse D A and Nahum A 2018 arXiv e-prints arXiv:1803.00089 (Preprint 1803.00089)

    2018 arXiv

  149. [159]

    Lezama T L M, Bera S and Bardarson J H 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(16) 161106 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.161106

    2019 doi

  150. [161]

    Nahum A, Ruhman J and Huse D A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98(3) 035118 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035118

    2018 doi

  151. [162]

    Nahum A, Ruhman J, Vijay S and Haah J 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7(3) 031016 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031016

    2017 doi

  152. [163]

    Luitz D J, Laflorencie N and Alet F 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93(6) 060201 URL http://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.060201

    2016 doi

  153. [164]

    Rakovszky T, Pollmann F and von Keyserlingk C W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(25) 250602 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.250602

    2019 doi

  154. [165]

    Huang Y 2019 arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00977

    2019 arXiv

  155. [166]

    Swingle B and Chowdhury D 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95(6) 060201 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.95.060201

    2017

  156. [167]

    Foini L and Kurchan J 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99(4) 042139 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevE.99.042139

    2019

  157. [168]

    Chan A, De Luca A and Chalker J T 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(22) 220601 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.220601

    2019 doi

  158. [169]

    Luitz D J and Lev Y B 2017 Annalen der Physik 529 1600350

    2017

  159. [170]

    Roy S, Lev Y B and Luitz D J 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98(6) 060201 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.060201

    2018 doi

  160. [171]

    Serbyn M, Papi´ c Z and Abanin D A 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5(4) 041047 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041047

    2015 doi

  161. [172]

    Serbyn M and Moore J E 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93(4) 041424 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.93.041424

    2016

  162. [173]

    Monthus C 2016 Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016 073301

    2016

  163. [174]

    Serbyn M, Papi´ c Z and Abanin D A 2017Phys. Rev. B 96(10) 104201 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.104201

    doi

  164. [175]

    Bertrand C L and Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa A M 2016Phys. Rev. B 94(14) 144201 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.144201

    doi

  165. [176]

    Colmenarez L, McClarty P A, Haque M and Luitz D J 2019 arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.10701

    2019 arXiv

  166. [177]

    Znidaric M, Scardicchio A and Varma V K 2016 arXiv:1604.08567 URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1604.08567

    2016 arXiv

  167. [178]

    Khait I, Gazit S, Yao N Y and Auerbach A 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93(22) 224205 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.224205

    2016 doi

  168. [179]

    Crowley P J, Laumann C and Gopalakrishnan S 2018 arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.04595

    2018 arXiv

  169. [180]

    L¨ uschen H P, Bordia P, Scherg S, Alet F, Altman E, Schneider U and Bloch I 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(26) 260401 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.260401

    2017 doi

  170. [181]

    Lev Y B, Kennes D M, Kl¨ ockner C, Reichman D R and Karrasch C 2017 EPL (Europhysics Letters) 119 37003

    2017

  171. [182]

    Agrawal U, Gopalakrishnan S and Vasseur R 2019 arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.02774

    2019 arXiv

  172. [183]

    Kj¨ all J A, Bardarson J H and Pollmann F 2014Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(10) 107204 URL https://link. 76 aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.107204

    doi

  173. [184]

    Luitz D J, Laflorencie N and Alet F 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91(8) 081103 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.081103

    2015 doi

  174. [185]

    Khemani V, Sheng D N and Huse D A 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(7) 075702 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.075702

    2017 doi

  175. [186]

    Chayes J T, Chayes L, Fisher D S and Spencer T 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 57(24) 2999–3002 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2999

    1986 doi

  176. [187]

    Chandran A, Laumann C R and Oganesyan V 2015 arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.04285

    2015 arXiv

  177. [188]

    Luck J 1993 EPL (Europhysics Letters) 24 359

    1993

  178. [189]

    ˇZnidariˇ c M and Ljubotina M 2018Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 4595–4600

  179. [190]

    Doggen E V and Mirlin A D 2019 arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.06971

    2019 arXiv

  180. [191]

    Zhang S X and Yao H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(20) 206601 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.121.206601

    2018

  181. [192]

    Zhang S X and Yao H 2019 arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00971

    2019 arXiv

  182. [193]

    Huse D A, Nandkishore R, Oganesyan V, Pal A and Sondhi S L 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88(1) 014206 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.014206

    2013 doi

  183. [194]

    Bahri Y, Vosk R, Altman E and Vishwanath A 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7341

    2015

  184. [195]

    Vasseur R, Potter A C and Parameswaran S A 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 217201 URL http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.217201

    2015 doi

  185. [196]

    Potter A C and Vasseur R 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94(22) 224206 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.94.224206

    2016

  186. [197]

    Gurarie V and Chalker J T 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68(13) 134207 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.68.134207

    2003

  187. [198]

    Nandkishore R and Potter A C 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90(19) 195115 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.195115

    2014 doi

  188. [199]

    Friedman A J, Vasseur R, Potter A C and Parameswaran S A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98(6) 064203 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.064203

    2018 doi

  189. [200]

    Prakash A, Ganeshan S, Fidkowski L and Wei T C 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96(16) 165136 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.165136

    2017 doi

  190. [201]

    Vasseur R, Friedman A J, Parameswaran S A and Potter A C 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93(13) 134207 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.134207

    2016 doi

  191. [202]

    Altland A and Zirnbauer M R 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55(2) 1142–1161 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.1142

    1997 doi

  192. [203]

    Kitaev A 2009 AIP Conference Proceedings 1134 22–30

    2009

  193. [204]

    Ryu S, Schnyder A P, Furusaki A and Ludwig A W W 2010 New Journal of Physics 12 065010 URL http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/12/i=6/a=065010

    2010

  194. [206]

    Huang Y and Moore J E 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90(22) 220202 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.90.220202

    2014

  195. [207]

    Pekker D, Refael G, Altman E, Demler E and Oganesyan V 2014 Phys. Rev. X 4 011052

    2014

  196. [208]

    Vosk R and Altman E 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 067204 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.110.067204

    2013

  197. [209]

    Ma S k, Dasgupta C and Hu C k 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 1434–1437 URL http://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1434

    1979 doi

  198. [210]

    Dasgupta C and Ma S k 1980 Phys. Rev. B 22(3) 1305–1319 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.22.1305

    1980

  199. [211]

    Oganesyan V, Pal A and Huse D A 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80(11) 115104 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.115104

    2009 doi

  200. [212]

    Chandran A, Khemani V, Laumann C R and Sondhi S L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 144201

    2014

  201. [213]

    Agarwal K, Demler E and Martin I 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92(18) 184203 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.184203

    2015 doi

  202. [214]

    Protopopov I V, Panda R K, Parolini T, Scardicchio A, Demler E and Abanin D A 2019 arXiv e-prints arXiv:1902.09236 (Preprint 1902.09236) 77

    2019 arXiv

  203. [215]

    Gopalakrishnan S and Huse D A 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(13) 134305 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.134305

    2019 doi

  204. [216]

    Nandkishore R M and Sondhi S L 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7(4) 041021 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041021

    2017 doi

  205. [217]

    Brenes M, Dalmonte M, Heyl M and Scardicchio A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(3) 030601 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.030601

    2018 doi

  206. [218]

    Akhtar A A, Nandkishore R M and Sondhi S L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98(11) 115109 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.115109

    2018 doi

  207. [219]

    Levitov L 1989 EPL (Europhysics Letters) 9 83

    1989

  208. [220]

    Levitov L 1990 Physical review letters 64 547

    1990

  209. [221]

    Aleiner I, Altshuler B and Efetov K 2011 Physical review letters 107 076401

    2011

  210. [222]

    Burin A L 2006 arXiv preprint cond-mat/0611387

    2006 arXiv

  211. [223]

    Yao N Y, Laumann C R, Gopalakrishnan S, Knap M, M¨ uller M, Demler E A and Lukin M D 2014Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(24) 243002 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.243002

    doi

  212. [226]

    Gutman D B, Protopopov I V, Burin A L, Gornyi I V, Santos R A and Mirlin A D 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93(24) 245427 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.245427

    2016 doi

  213. [227]

    Tikhonov K S and Mirlin A D 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97(21) 214205 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214205

    2018 doi

  214. [228]

    Mirlin A D, Fyodorov Y V, Dittes F M, Quezada J and Seligman T H 1996 Physical Review E 54 3221

    1996

  215. [229]

    Cuevas E, Gasparian V and Ortuno M 2001 Physical review letters 87 056601

    2001

  216. [230]

    Villalonga B, Yu X, Luitz D J and Clark B K 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97(10) 104406 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.104406

    2018 doi

  217. [231]

    Pietracaprina F, Mac´ e N, Luitz D J and Alet F 2018 SciPost Phys 5 45

    2018

  218. [232]

    Gornyi I, Mirlin A, M¨ uller M and Polyakov D 2017 Annalen der Physik 529 1600365

    2017

  219. [233]

    Aleiner I, Altshuler B and Shlyapnikov G 2010 Nature Physics 6 900

    2010

  220. [234]

    Nandkishore R 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90(18) 184204 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.90.184204

    2014

  221. [235]

    Michal V P, Aleiner I L, Altshuler B L and Shlyapnikov G V 2016 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 E4455–E4459

    2016

  222. [236]

    Carleo G, Becca F, Schir´ o M and Fabrizio M 2012 Scientific reports 2 243

    2012

  223. [237]

    Grover T and Fisher M P A 2014 J. Stat. Mech. 2014 P10010 ISSN 1742-5468

    2014

  224. [238]

    De Roeck W and Huveneers F 2014 Communications in Mathematical Physics 332 1017–1082

    2014

  225. [239]

    Schiulaz M and M¨ uller M 2014 Ideal quantum glass transitions: Many-body localization without quenched disorder AIP Conference Proceedings vol 1610 (AIP Publishing) pp 11–23 URL http:// scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/10.1063/1.4893505

    2014 doi

  226. [240]

    De Roeck W and Huveneers F 2015 Can translation invariant systems exhibit a many-body localized phase? From Particle Systems to Partial Differential Equations II (Springer) pp 173–192

    2015

  227. [241]

    Yao N Y, Laumann C R, Cirac J I, Lukin M D and Moore J E 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(24) 240601 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.240601

    2016 doi

  228. [242]

    Smith A, Knolle J, Kovrizhin D L and Moessner R 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(26) 266601 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.266601

    2017 doi

  229. [243]

    Smith A, Knolle J, Moessner R and Kovrizhin D L 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(17) 176601 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.176601

    2017 doi

  230. [244]

    Smith A, Knolle J, Moessner R and Kovrizhin D L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97(24) 245137 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.245137

    2018 doi

  231. [245]

    Parameswaran S A and Gopalakrishnan S 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(14) 146601 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.146601

    2017 doi

  232. [246]

    Fradkin E 1986 Phys. Rev. B 33(5) 3263–3268 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 33.3263 78

    1986 doi

  233. [247]

    Goswami P and Chakravarty S 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(19) 196803 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.196803

    2011 doi

  234. [248]

    Syzranov S V, Radzihovsky L and Gurarie V 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(16) 166601 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.166601

    2015 doi

  235. [249]

    Pixley J H, Huse D A and Das Sarma S 2016 Phys. Rev. X 6(2) 021042 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021042

    2016 doi

  236. [250]

    Pixley J H, Chou Y Z, Goswami P, Huse D A, Nandkishore R, Radzihovsky L and Das Sarma S 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95(23) 235101 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.235101

    2017 doi

  237. [251]

    Buchhold M, Diehl S and Altland A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(21) 215301 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.215301

    2018 doi

  238. [252]

    Pixley J H, Wilson J H, Huse D A and Gopalakrishnan S 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(20) 207604 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.207604

    2018 doi

  239. [253]

    Parameswaran S A and Vasseur R 2018 Reports on Progress in Physics 81 082501 URL https: //doi.org/10.1088%2F1361-6633%2Faac9ed

    2018

  240. [254]

    Galperin Y M, Altshuler B L, Bergli J and Shantsev D V 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(9) 097009 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.097009

    2006 doi

  241. [255]

    Gopalakrishnan S and Nandkishore R 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 224203

    2014

  242. [256]

    Fischer M H, Maksymenko M and Altman E 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 160401

    2016

  243. [257]

    Levi E, Heyl M, Lesanovsky I and Garrahan J P 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 237203

    2016

  244. [258]

    van Nieuwenburg E P, Malo J Y, Daley A J and Fischer M H 2017 Quantum Science and Technology 3 01LT02

    2017

  245. [259]

    Lenarˇ ciˇ c Z, Altman E and Rosch A 2018Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(26) 267603 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.267603

    doi

  246. [260]

    Crow D and Joynt R 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89(4) 042123 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.89.042123

    2014

  247. [261]

    Nandkishore R and Gopalakrishnan S 2016 Ann. Phys

    2016

  248. [262]

    Gopalakrishnan S, Islam K R and Knap M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(4) 046601 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.046601

    2017 doi

  249. [263]

    Amir A, Lahini Y and Perets H B 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79(5) 050105 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.050105

    2009 doi

  250. [264]

    Prelovˇ sek P, Bonˇ ca J and Mierzejewski M 2018Phys. Rev. B 98(12) 125119 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.125119

    doi

  251. [265]

    Bonˇ ca J, Trugman S A and Mierzejewski M 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97(17) 174202 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.174202

    2018 doi

  252. [266]

    Mierzejewski M, Prelovˇ sek P and Bonˇ ca J 2019Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(20) 206601 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.206601

    doi

  253. [267]

    Ambegaokar V, Halperin B I and Langer J S 1971 Phys. Rev. B 4(8) 2612–2620 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2612

    1971 doi

  254. [268]

    George R E, Witzel W, Riemann H, Abrosimov N V, N¨ otzel N, Thewalt M L W and Morton J J L 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(6) 067601 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105. 067601

    2010 doi

  255. [269]

    Guichard R, Balian S J, Wolfowicz G, Mortemousque P A and Monteiro T S 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91(21) 214303 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.214303

    2015 doi

  256. [270]

    Banerjee S and Altman E 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(11) 116601 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.116601

    2016 doi

  257. [271]

    Nandkishore R 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92(24) 245141 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.92.245141

    2015

  258. [272]

    Hyatt K, Garrison J R, Potter A C and Bauer B 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95(3) 035132 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035132

    2017 doi

  259. [273]

    Huse D A, Nandkishore R, Pietracaprina F, Ros V and Scardicchio A 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 014203

    2015

  260. [274]

    Gornyi I, Mirlin A, Polyakov D and Burin A 2017 Annalen der Physik 529 1600360

    2017

  261. [275]

    Schecter M, Iadecola T and Das Sarma S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98(17) 174201 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.174201

    2018 doi

  262. [276]

    Reichl M D and Mueller E J 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93(3) 031601 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 79 1103/PhysRevA.93.031601

    2016

  263. [277]

    Rossignolo M and Dell’Anna L 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(5) 054211 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.054211

    2019 doi

  264. [278]

    Fiete G A 2007 Rev. Mod. Phys. 79(3) 801–820 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.79.801

    2007

  265. [279]

    Parameswaran S A and Gopalakrishnan S 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 024201

    2017

  266. [280]

    Prelovˇ sek P, Bariˇ si´ c O S andˇZnidariˇ c M 2016Phys. Rev. B 94(24) 241104 URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.241104

    doi

  267. [281]

    Kozarzewski M, Prelovˇ sek P and Mierzejewski M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(24) 246602 URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.246602

    2018 doi

  268. [282]

    ´Sroda M, Prelovˇ sek P and Mierzejewski M 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99(12) 121110 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.121110

    2019 doi

  269. [283]

    Vandersypen L M K and Chuang I L 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76(4) 1037–1069 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1037

    2005 doi

  270. [284]

    Khemani V, Lazarides A, Moessner R and Sondhi S 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 250401 URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.250401

    2016 doi

  271. [285]

    Else D V, Bauer B and Nayak C 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(9) 090402 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.090402

    2016 doi

  272. [286]

    Yao N Y and Nayak C 2018 arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.06657

    2018 arXiv

  273. [287]

    Rudner M S, Lindner N H, Berg E and Levin M 2013 Phys. Rev. X 3(3) 031005 URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.031005

    2013 doi

  274. [288]

    Titum P, Berg E, Rudner M S, Refael G and Lindner N H 2016 Phys. Rev. X 6(2) 021013 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021013

    2016 doi

  275. [289]

    Po H C, Fidkowski L, Morimoto T, Potter A C and Vishwanath A 2016 Phys. Rev. X 6(4) 041070 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041070

    2016 doi

  276. [290]

    Lindner N H, Berg E and Rudner M S 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7(1) 011018 URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.011018

    2017 doi

  277. [291]

    Abanin D, De Roeck W, Ho W W and Huveneers F 2017 Communications in Mathematical Physics 354 809–827 ISSN 1432-0916 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-017-2930-x

    2017 doi

  278. [292]

    Bukov M, Gopalakrishnan S, Knap M and Demler E 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(20) 205301 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.205301

    2015 doi

  279. [293]

    Else D V, Bauer B and Nayak C 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7(1) 011026 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.011026

    2017 doi

  280. [294]

    Ponte P, Papi´ c Z, Huveneers F m c and Abanin D A 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(14) 140401 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.140401

    2015 doi

  281. [295]

    Biroli G and Garrahan J P 2013 The Journal of chemical physics 138 12A301

    2013

  282. [296]

    Berthier L, Biroli G, Bouchaud J P, Cipelletti L and van Saarloos W 2011 Dynamical heterogeneities in glasses, colloids, and granular media vol 150 (OUP Oxford)

    2011

  283. [297]

    Berthier L and Biroli G 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83(2) 587–645 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.83.587

    2011

  284. [298]

    Pomeau Y and Resibois P 1975 Physics Reports 19 63–139

    1975

  285. [299]

    Varma V K, Lerose A, Pietracaprina F, Goold J and Scardicchio A 2017 Journal of Statistical Mechan- ics: Theory and Experiment 2017 053101 URL https://doi.org/10.1088%2F1742-5468%2Faa668b

    2017

  286. [300]

    Mendoza-Arenas J J, ˇZnidariˇ c M, Varma V K, Goold J, Clark S R and Scardicchio A 2019Phys. Rev. B 99(9) 094435 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.094435

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.