Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 173 references

Theoretical Perspectives on Biological Machines

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that coarse-grained stochastic kinetic models of non-equilibrium networks can account for the in vitro behavior of molecular motors, chaperones, and helicases, and can expose general cost–precision bounds.

desk verdict Useful, authoritative review of stochastic kinetic models for biological machines, undercut by a leftover draft block in Section V.C and a TUR efficiency claim that is less secure than the text suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11323 v1 pith:3F5DRI5F submitted 2019-08-29 physics.bio-ph cond-mat.softq-bio.SC

Mauro L. Mugnai , Changbong Hyeon , Michael Hinczewski , D. Thirumalai This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phcond-mat.softq-bio.SC
keywords molecularmotorsstochastickineticmodelsthermodynamicuncertaintyrelationnon-equilibriumsteadystateschaperoneshelicasescoarse-grainedmasterequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that despite the enormous structural diversity of biological machines, a few general theoretical methods built on coarse-grained network models can quantitatively explain many in vitro experiments and address how precision, energetic cost, and optimal performance are balanced. Its central claim is that kinesin, myosin, dynein, GroEL/GroES, and helicases can all be described profitably as non-equilibrium stochastic kinetic systems: discrete states connected by measurable transition rates, obeying a master equation. The same framework yields thermodynamic bounds such as the thermodynamic uncertainty relation, and also motivates structural extensions, like polymer-theory descriptions of motor architecture, that connect kinetics to actual lever-arm mechanics. If this claim is right, general physical principles, not just case-by-case biochemistry, shape the design and operation of biological machines, even though molecular details still matter for many specific functions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the stochastic kinetic model (SKM): a discrete-state, continuous-time Markov jump process governed by a master equation, where each transition rate $w_{ij}$ is measurable and connected to the biochemistry of the machine. The load-bearing identity is the cycle-affinity relation: for each cycle $ u$, the ratio of forward to backward cycle fluxes satisfies $J_{ u+}/J_{ u-} = e^{\beta A_\nu} = e^{\Delta S_\nu/k_B}$, so the affinity $A_\nu$ equals the entropy produced per cycle and dictates the direction of the cycle. This identity links measurable rates to thermodynamics and leads to the thermodynamic uncertainty relation $\dot{Q}\,\mathrm{Var}(X)/\langle X\rangle^2 \ge 2k_BT$, where $\dot{Q}$ is the heat dissipation rate and $X$ is a time-integrated observable such as motor displacement. The machinery also includes structural supplements: polymer-theory models of the myosin V lever arm that replace phenomenological Bell-model load factors with analytically tractable first-passage rates, and coarse-grained Brownian dynamics simulations that couple motor architecture to the catalytic cycle.

What would settle it

Measure the heat dissipation rate, velocity, and diffusivity of a single processive motor across a range of loads and ATP concentrations and compute $Q = \dot{Q}\,2D/V^2$; any condition with $Q < 2k_BT$ would falsify the central thermodynamic uncertainty bound. Alternatively, resolving dwell-time distributions that are systematically non-exponential and cannot be reproduced by any finite-state Markov network would falsify the discrete-state Markov reduction itself.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a few general theoretical methods, built on coarse-grained network models, provide a common quantitative language for biological machines as structurally different as molecular motors, chaperones, and helicases. The unifying description is a stochastic kinetic model: a continuous-time Markov jump process on a network of experimentally distinguishable intermediate states, with rates set by bulk and single-molecule experiments. From this description the paper derives thermodynamic identities, including the relation between cycle affinities and entropy production, and the thermodynamic uncertainty relation bounding the cost of precision. It then shows how the same framework, supplemented by polymer-theory descriptions of motor architecture and coarse-grained simulations, accounts for force-velocity curves, randomness parameters, run lengths, step-size distributions, and the iterative annealing mechanism of chaperonin-assisted folding. The paper also emphasizes limits: point mutations can drastically change function, and genuine understanding of in vivo behavior remains a major challenge.

Load-bearing premise

The whole framework stands on the assumption that a machine's working cycle can be represented by a small set of discrete, experimentally observable states that the machine hops between with fixed rates; if the relevant states are hidden or the dynamics slows in a glassy, molecule-dependent way, the quantitative cost-precision bounds and kinetic predictions do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multi-cycle kinetic networks, not just unicyclic ones, are needed to describe stalled motors: at stall the net mechanical current vanishes but chemical current continues, so heat dissipation is nonzero and the thermodynamic uncertainty parameter $Q$ diverges at stall.
  • For chaperonins, the iterative annealing recursion predicts native yield after $n$ rounds as $N_n = 1-(1-\Phi)^n$ for GroEL, where only misfolded states are recognized, and the generalized steady-state yield $N_\infty = \Phi/[\kappa+(1-\kappa)\Phi]$ for RNA chaperones that also act on native states.
  • For helicases, processivity but not necessarily velocity increases universally with applied force, independent of motor architecture and DNA sequence; the paper states that this prediction has already been confirmed experimentally.
  • Motors appear semi-optimized under cellular conditions: for kinesin-family motors and dynein at roughly $[\mathrm{ATP}]\approx 1$ mM and $f\approx 1$ pN, the measured uncertainty parameter $Q$ lies between about 7 and 20 $k_BT$, not far from the universal $2k_BT$ bound, suggesting evolutionary tuning toward transport efficiency.
  • The distinction between power-stroke and ratchet load partitioning is thermodynamically consequential: the stall force $f_{\mathrm{stall}} = -\Delta\mu_{\mathrm{hyd}}/d_0$ is independent of network complexity, while efficiency at maximum power depends on how load is distributed among transition rates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same thermodynamic uncertainty machinery could rank other energy-intensive processes, such as kinetic proofreading, circadian clocks, or error correction, by the energetic cost per unit precision, not just transport motors; the paper does not make this application.
  • Editorial inference: if hidden intermediate states exist below the millisecond resolution of current experiments, the rates inferred from dwell-time statistics would be effective rates, and values of $Q$ computed from them would likely overestimate the true thermodynamic cost; testing this would require comparing TUR estimates with direct calorimetric heat measurements.
  • Editorial inference: the polymer-theory prediction that stomp probabilities depend on load has not yet been measured; an optical-trap or high-speed atomic-force-microscopy experiment that resolves leading and trailing stomps under load would directly test this quantitative extension, which the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a perspective on theoretical approaches to biological machines, with a focus on stochastic kinetic models (master equations, cycle affinities, fluctuation theorems), their application to molecular motors (kinesin, myosin V, dynein), models with detachment, polymer-physics-based coarse-grained theories, coarse-grained simulations, and the thermodynamic uncertainty relation (TUR) as a measure of the cost-precision trade-off. The authors also survey molecular chaperones and helicases within the same conceptual framework. The central claim is that a few general theoretical methods built on coarse-grained network models have proven useful for accounting for many in vitro experiments and for addressing questions about how precision, energetic cost, and optimal performance are balanced.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the review makes a valuable case for the generality of stochastic kinetic theories across structurally diverse biological machines, and the TUR-based analysis introduces a unifying quantitative metric for transport efficiency. The manuscript's explicit comparisons with experimental data are a strength, particularly the myosin V polymer theory (Section VII), which is presented as a two-parameter fit to multiple independent experimental datasets. The review also provides a careful pedagogical exposition of the master-equation framework, cycle affinities, and the physical meaning of entropy production. However, the quantitative 'semi-optimized' TUR conclusion for motors is not fully secure, and the manuscript contains an unfinished inserted draft block that must be resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V.C.2] Section V.C.2 contains a large block labeled 'DRAFT' that is repeated verbatim three times, with a figure caption and text evidently copied from another manuscript (Hwang et al.). This block duplicates content later presented in Section V.C.3, disrupts the reading, and indicates that the manuscript is not in its final form; it must be removed or fully integrated before the paper can be considered for publication.
  2. [Section IX (Eq. 65) and Section V.D] The claim that kinesin-family motors and dynein are 'semi-optimized' under cellular conditions (Section IX, Fig. 22) rests on the TUR parameter Q computed from heat dissipation rates of a fitted Markov network (Eq. 65 using Q-dot from Eqs. 48–53). As the paper itself notes in Section V.D, the double-cycle model for kinesin omits mechanically induced slippage, and the Harada–Sasa measurement by Ariga et al. shows that heat dissipated along the monitored coordinate plus work does not exhaust the chemical free-energy input, indicating unmonitored dissipative channels. These omitted channels would increase the true heat dissipation and hence Q, potentially moving motors far from the 2 kBT bound and weakening the 'semi-optimized' conclusion. The manuscript should provide an estimate of the omitted contribution or explicitly qualify the claim.
  3. [Section IX.2 (Fig. 21e)] The Q(f,[ATP]) diagram for dynein is computed using a uni-cyclic network model, even though the manuscript itself states that this model is 'in principle not satisfactory' because it cannot account for the physically correct behavior at stall and superstall conditions. Since the subsequent summary statement in Section IX.2 includes dynein among the 'semi-optimized' motors, the use of an admittedly inappropriate model undermines the quantitative conclusion; a multi-cycle model or a clear caveat should be provided.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IX (Eq. 65)] The symbol Q is used both for the heat dissipation and for the TUR product in Eq. 65, which is confusing; distinct symbols should be used for these two quantities.
  2. [Section V.C.1] In the discussion of one-state models, "fstall ≈ 2.8nm" should have units of pN, not nm, when referring to myosin V.
  3. [Section I] The phrase "walk the the reader" should be "walk the reader".
  4. [Section V.B] The phrase "Michealis-Menten" should be "Michaelis-Menten".
  5. [Section X] The word "cheperonin" in Section X should be "chaperonin".
  6. [Fig. 21e caption] The word "dynesin" in the Fig. 21e caption should be "dynein".

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Mostly self-contained review; one illustrative D-versus-V claim is definitional and self-cited.

  1. self definitional [Section III, paragraph on the kinesin-1 randomness parameter]
    "When the diffusion constant D is calculated from the randomness parameter with the knowledge of V and d0, and D is compared with V measured under the same conditions, it can be shown that D increases monotonically with V (Hwang and Hyeon, 2017) in contrast to passive diffusion. This result is a consequence of the enzyme catalytic turnover (Hwang and Hyeon, 2017)."

    The preceding definition in the same paragraph is r = 2D/(d0 V), so D = (r d0/2)V. The claimed monotone dependence of D on V is therefore an algebraic transcription of the defining formula (for weakly varying r) rather than an independently derived consequence of active dynamics. The physical interpretation is then attributed to a self-citation, Hwang and Hyeon (2017), with no in-paper derivation. The step is illustrative and not load-bearing for the review's central thesis, but it is the clearest instance where a result is circular by construction.

full rationale

The review's central derivation chain is self-contained and anchored to external experimental data. The master-equation framework, Hill graph-theoretic flux formulas, entropy-production identities, and fluctuation-theorem relations are derived in-text from standard definitions. Applications to kinesin, myosin V, dynein, and helicases are compared with published measurements (e.g., Visscher et al., Carter and Cross, Baker et al., Mehta et al., Johnson et al.), and the coarse-grained polymer theory of Hinczewski et al. (2013) is explicitly presented as a simultaneous best-fit with two free parameters; neither parameter is relabeled as an independent prediction. The TUR-based Q values in Section IX are computed from kinetic-network rates that were themselves fitted to V and D data, so the 'semi-optimized' conclusion is model-dependent and not an independent test; however, Q is not set equal to V or D by construction, so this is a limitation in evidential independence rather than definitional circularity. The inserted DRAFT/Hwang et al. passage likewise reports Q from fitted rates as an acknowledged fitting workflow. The only concrete circularity-adjacent step is the Section III illustration in which D is built from r and V by definition and then presented, via a self-citation, as a consequence of active-particle physics. That step is minor and does not infect the paper's main claim that stochastic kinetic models can account for many in vitro experiments and illuminate cost-precision trade-offs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper introduces no new entities. The central synthetic claim depends on standard coarse-grained modeling assumptions from the cited literature: Markov-state reduction, chemostat driving, time-scale separation, and fitted load-dependence parameters. These assumptions are the price of admission for the quantitative statements the review collects.

free parameters (5)
  • theta (load distribution factor, Bell model) = not fixed; fitted to force-velocity data
    In Eqs. 35 and 42, theta partitions the external load between forward and backward rates; one-state and multi-state motor results, including efficiency and stall force, depend on its fitted value.
  • w* (backward rate prefactor, one-state motor model) = set by fitting the time scale
    In Eqs. 31-33, w* sets the overall rate scale so velocity and heat dissipation are linearly proportional to it; no independent determination is given.
  • b (geometric rebinding suppression, myosin V polymer theory) = approximately 0.065
    Free parameter fit to myosin V stepping data; enters rates for trailing stomps and backward steps in Eq. 62.
  • nu_c (orientational constraint strength, myosin V polymer theory) = estimated by fitting
    Second free parameter of Hinczewski et al. (2013); controls the endpoint distribution P(r) used in first-passage times in Eq. 60.
  • k_ij rates of 6-state double-cycle kinesin network = simultaneous fit to V and D versus [ATP] and force
    Used to produce Q(f,[ATP]) diagrams in Figs. 19 and 21; the heat dissipation values that support the semi-optimized conclusion are outputs of this fit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A biological machine can be represented as a continuous-time Markov jump process over N experimentally distinguishable discrete states.
    Section IV states this explicitly as the basis for stochastic kinetic models; if hidden states or non-Markovian dynamics matter, quantitative claims from SKMs do not follow.
  • domain assumption The solution around the machine acts as a chemostat that holds [ATP], [ADP], and [Pi] fixed, producing a non-equilibrium steady state.
    Invoked in Section IV.B to derive the NESS framework and Eq. 9 for entropy production; in vivo concentrations are buffered but not clamped in the same way.
  • domain assumption Chemical transitions are slow compared with fast conformational relaxation, allowing coarse-grained rate descriptions.
    Stated in Sections IV.C and VII as time-scale separation; underlies both the master-equation reduction and the polymer first-passage relation in Eq. 60.
  • domain assumption Load affects rates through an exponential Bell or Arrhenius form with a fixed load-distribution factor.
    Assumed in Eqs. 35 and 47; the force-velocity curves and stall-force predictions of the reviewed motor models depend on this phenomenological form.
  • standard math Microscopic reversibility and detailed balance hold at the level of the discrete-state network.
    Used throughout Section IV to relate rate-product ratios to affinities and Delta mu (Eqs. 5, 26, 40); standard for Markov networks but still an assumption about the coarse-grained states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theoretical Perspectives on Biological Machines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3F5DRI5F

@misc{pith2026190811323,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theoretical Perspectives on Biological Machines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3F5DRI5F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11323}
}
read the original abstract

Many biological functions are executed by molecular machines, which consume energy and convert it into mechanical work. Biological machines have evolved to transport cargo, facilitate folding of proteins and RNA, remodel chromatin and replicate DNA. A common aspect of these machines is that their functions are driven out of equilibrium. It is a challenge to provide a general framework for understanding the functions of biological machines, such as molecular motors, molecular chaperones, and helicases. Using these machines as prototypical examples, we describe a few general theoretical methods providing insights into their functions. Although the theories rely on coarse-graining of these complex systems they have proven useful in not only accounting for many in vitro experiments but also addressing questions such as how the trade-off between precision, energetic costs and optimal performances are balanced. However, many complexities associated with biological machines will require one to go beyond current theoretical methods. Simple point mutations in the enzyme could drastically alter functions, making the motors bi-directional or result in unexpected diseases or dramatically restrict the capacity of molecular chaperones to help proteins fold. These examples are reminders that while the search for principles of generality in biology is intellectually stimulating, one also ought to keep in mind that molecular details must be accounted for to develop a deeper understanding of processes driven by biological machines. Going beyond generic descriptions of in vitro behavior to making genuine understanding of in vivo functions will likely remain a major challenge for some time to come. The combination of careful experiments and the use of physical principles will be useful in elucidating the rules governing the workings of biological machines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11323 by the authors.

Figure 4
Figure 4. There are four crucial steps (see Fig. 4). In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Analysis of kinesin-1 based on the 6-state double-cycle kinetic model. A. Schematics of the 6-state double-cycle kinetic network for hand-over-hand dynamics of kinesin-1, where T, D, and „ denote ATP-, ADP-bound, and apo state, respectively. Through binding [(1)æ(2)] and hydrolysis of ATP [(2)æ(5)], and release of ADP [(5)æ(6)], kinesin moves forward in the F-cycle [(1) æ (2) æ (5) æ (6) æ (1)], where it takes a bac… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

173 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Johnson, J

    Alberts, B., A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter (2008), Molecular Biology of the Cell , 5th ed. (Garland Science). Alhadeff, R., and A. Warshel (2017), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114 (39), 10426. Ali, J. A., and T. M. Lohman (1997), Science 275 (5298),

    2008

  2. [3]

    R., and C

    Sellers, J. R., and C. Veigel (2010), Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 17 (5),

    work page 2010

  3. [4]

    Ikebe (2005), Journal of Biological Chemistry 280 (32), 29381

    Homma, K., and M. Ikebe (2005), Journal of Biological Chemistry 280 (32), 29381. Hopfield, J. J. (1974), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 71 (10),

    2005

  4. [5]

    M., and K

    Lohman, T. M., and K. P. Bjornson (1996), Annual review of biochemistry 65 (1),

    work page 1996

  5. [7]

    Pang, P. S., E. Jankowsky, P. J. Planet, and A. M. Pyle (2002), The EMBO journal 21 (5),

    work page 2002

  6. [11]

    (1977), Science 196 (4295),

    Jacob, F. (1977), Science 196 (4295),

    1977

  7. [26]

    (2012), Reports on progress in physics 75 (12), 126001

    Seifert, U. (2012), Reports on progress in physics 75 (12), 126001. Sellers, J. (2000), Biochem. Biophys. ACTA - Mol. Cell Res. 1496 (1),

    work page 2012

  8. [29]

    Caporizzo, Y

    Mugnai, M., M. Caporizzo, Y. Goldman, and D. Thirumalai (2019), bioRxiv , 684696. Mugnai, M. L., and D. Thirumalai (2017), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (22), E4389. Mukherjee, S., R. Alhadeff, and A. Warshel (2017), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114 (9),

    work page 2019

Show all 173 references
  1. [31]

    (1983), Journal of statistical physics 31 (3),

    Derrida, B. (1983), Journal of statistical physics 31 (3),

    1983

  2. [35]

    Dong, F., E. P. Gogol, and P. H. von Hippel (1995), Journal of Biological Chemistry 270 (13),

    1995

  3. [39]

    Liepelt, and A

    Lipowsky, R., S. Liepelt, and A. Valleriani (2009), Journal of Statistical Physics 135 (5),

    2009

  4. [44]

    Amitani, E

    Sakamoto, T., I. Amitani, E. Yokota, and T. Ando (2000), Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 272 (2),

    2000

  5. [59]

    Velankar, S. S., P. Soultanas, M. S. Dillingham, H. S. Subra- manya, and D. B. Wigley (1999), Cell 97 (1),

    1999

  6. [61]

    Sasa (2018a), Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2018 (6), 063209

    Dechant, A., and S.-i. Sasa (2018a), Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2018 (6), 063209. Dechant, A., and S.-i. Sasa (2018b), Physical Review E 97 (6), 062101. Delagoutte, E., and P. H. Von Hippel (2002), Quarterly re- views of biophysics 35 (4),

    2018

  7. [62]

    Hwang, W., M. J. Lang, and M. Karplus (2017), eLife 6, e28948. 42 Hyeon, C., and W. Hwang (2017), Physical Review E 96 (1), 012156. Hyeon, C., S. Klumpp, and J. N. Onuchic (2009), Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 11 (24),

    2017

  8. [72]

    B., and M

    Kolomeisky, A. B., and M. E. Fisher (2000), Physica A: Sta- tistical Mechanics and its Applications 279 (1),

    2000

  9. [73]

    I., and D

    Brown, A. I., and D. A. Sivak (2017), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (42), 11057. Bustamante, C., W. Cheng, and Y. X. Mejia (2011), Cell 144 (4),

    2017

  10. [75]

    Silver, and N

    Venkatesan, M., L. Silver, and N. Nossal (1982), Journal of Biological Chemistry 257 (20), 12426. Visscher, K., M. J. Schnitzer, and S. M. Block (1999), Nature 400,

    1982

  11. [83]

    Hackney, D. D. (1988), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85 (17),

    1988

  12. [84]

    B., and M

    Kolomeisky, A. B., and M. E. Fisher (2003), Biophysical journal 84 (3),

    2003

  13. [88]

    Leibler, S., and D. A. Huse (1993), The Journal of cell biology 121 (6),

    1993

  14. [95]

    Tehver, and D

    Hinczewski, M., R. Tehver, and D. Thirumalai (2013), Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (43), E4059. Hirokawa, N., Y. Noda, Y. Tanaka, and S. Niwa (2009), Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10 (10),

    2013

  15. [113]

    Qian, H., and D. A. Beard (2005), Biophysical chemistry 114 (2-3),

    2005

  16. [128]

    Brooks, and D

    Stan, G., B. Brooks, and D. Thirumalai (2005), J. Mol. Biol. 350 (4),

    2005

  17. [133]

    A., and J

    Hartman, M. A., and J. A. Spudich (2012), J. Cell. Sci. 125 (7),

    2012

  18. [134]

    Schief, W. R., R. H. Clark, A. H. Crevenna, and J. Howard (2004), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (5),

    2004

  19. [140]

    Saito, and H

    Shiraishi, N., K. Saito, and H. Tasaki (2016), Physical review letters 117 (19), 190601. Soldati, T., and M. Schliwa (2006), Nature Reviews Molecu- lar Cell Biology 7 (12),

    2016

  20. [144]

    Samoray, and P

    Turina, P., D. Samoray, and P. Gr¨ aber (2003), The EMBO Journal 22 (3),

    2003

  21. [145]

    Sun, Y., O. Sato, F. Ruhnow, M. E. Arsenault, M. Ikebe, and Y. E. Goldman (2010), Nature structural & molecular biology 17 (4),

    2010

  22. [154]

    (1970), Nature 225 (5239),

    Hulett, H. (1970), Nature 225 (5239),

    1970

  23. [158]

    Vale, R. D., T. S. Reese, and M. P. Sheetz (1985), Cell42 (1),

    1985

  24. [159]

    (2007), Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry (Elsiver)

    Van Kampen, N. (2007), Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry (Elsiver). Veigel, C., S. Schmitz, F. Wang, and J. R. Sellers (2005), Nature cell biology 7 (9),

    2007

  25. [163]

    Rowe (1965), Science 149 (3682),

    Gibbons, I., and A. Rowe (1965), Science 149 (3682),

    1965

  26. [169]

    Lohman, T. M., E. J. Tomko, and C. G. Wu (2008), Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 9 (5),

    2008

  27. [183]

    Yamamoto, R

    Kodera, N., D. Yamamoto, R. Ishikawa, and T. Ando (2010), Nature 468 (7320),

    2010

  28. [184]

    Vu, H. T., S. Chakrabarti, M. Hinczewski, and D. Thirumalai (2016), Physical review letters 117 (7), 078101. Wagoner, J. A., and K. A. Dill (2016), The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry B 120 (26),

    2016

  29. [211]

    Okamoto, T

    Toyabe, S., T. Okamoto, T. Watanabe-Nakayama, H. Take- tani, S. Kudo, and E. Muneyuki (2010), Physical review letters 104 (19), 198103. Toyabe, S., T. Watanabe-Nakayama, T. Okamoto, S. Kudo, and E. Muneyuki (2011), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (44), 1795...

    2010

  30. [213]

    Reck-Peterson, S. L., W. B. Redwine, R. D. Vale, and A. P. Carter (2018), Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19 (6),

    2018

  31. [220]

    Post, P. L., M. J. Tyska, C. B. O’Connell, K. Johung, A. Hay- ward, and M. S. Mooseker (2002), Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 (14), 11679. Purcell, T. J., H. L. Sweeney, and J. A. Spudich (2005), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Amer...

    2002

  32. [221]

    Freyzon, K

    Dominguez, R., Y. Freyzon, K. M. Trybus, and C. Cohen (1998), Cell 94 (5),

    1998

  33. [232]

    Rock, R. S., S. E. Rice, A. L. Wells, T. J. Purcell, J. A. Spudich, and H. L. Sweeney (2001), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (24), 13655. Rodenfels, J., K. M. Neugebauer, and J. Howard (2019), Developmental cell 48 (5),

    2001

  34. [238]

    (1992), Molecular microbiology 6 (1),

    Lohman, T. (1992), Molecular microbiology 6 (1),

    1992

  35. [241]

    E., and A

    Fisher, M. E., and A. B. Kolomeisky (2001), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (14),

    2001

  36. [245]

    Toba, S., T. M. Watanabe, L. Yamaguchi-Okimoto, Y. Y. Toyoshima, and H. Higuchi (2006), Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 103 (15),

    2006

  37. [246]

    Blomberg (1980), Biophysical journal 31 (3),

    Ehrenberg, M., and C. Blomberg (1980), Biophysical journal 31 (3),

    1980

  38. [250]

    Hwang, W., M. J. Lang, and M. Karplus (2008), Structure 16 (1),

    2008

  39. [267]

    Iyer, L. M., D. D. Leipe, E. V. Koonin, and L. Aravind (2004), Journal of structural biology 146 (1-2),

    2004

  40. [290]

    Takahashi, K

    Itoh, H., A. Takahashi, K. Adachi, H. Noji, R. Yasuda, M. Yoshida, and K. Kinosita Jr (2004), Nature 427 (6973),

    2004

  41. [300]

    Oke, O. A., S. A. Burgess, E. Forgacs, P. J. Knight, T. Sakamoto, J. R. Sellers, H. White, and J. Trinick (2010), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (6),

    2010

  42. [302]

    Isojima, H., R. Iino, Y. Niitani, H. Noji, and M. Tomishige (2016), Nature chemical biology 12 (4),

    2016

  43. [303]

    Ma, W., K. D. Whitley, Y. R. Chemla, Z. Luthey-Schulten, and K. Schulten (2018), eLife 7, e34186. Maes, C., and M. H. Van Wieren (2003), Journal of Statistical Physics 112 (1-2),

    2018

  44. [308]

    Hyeon, X

    Chakrabarti, S., C. Hyeon, X. Ye, G. H. Lorimer, and D. Thirumalai (2017), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (51), E10919. Chakrabarti, S., C. Jarzynski, and D. Thirumalai (2019), Biophysical Journal 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.07.021. Cheng, W., S. Dumont, I. Tinoco,...

    2017 doi

  45. [317]

    Pylypenko, O., L. Song, A. Shima, Z. Yang, A. M. Houdusse, and H. L. Sweeney (2015), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (11), E1201. Qian, H. (2004), Physical Review E 69 (1), 012901. Qian, H. (2007), Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58,

    2015

  46. [318]

    K., and S

    Levin, M. K., and S. S. Patel (2002), Journal of Biological Chemistry 277 (33), 29377. Li, J.-H., W.-X. Lin, B. Zhang, D.-G. Nong, H.-P. Ju, J.-B. Ma, C.-H. Xu, F.-F. Ye, X. G. Xi, M. Li, et al. (2016), Nucleic acids research 44 (9),

    2002

  47. [323]

    Baker, J. E., E. B. Krementsova, G. G. Kennedy, A. Arm- strong, K. M. Trybus, and D. M. Warshaw (2004), Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (15),

    2004

  48. [329]

    Manosas, M., X. G. Xi, D. Bensimon, and V. Croquette (2010), Nuc. Acids Res. 38 (16),

    2010

  49. [333]

    West (2010), Proc

    Elber, R., and A. West (2010), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (11),

    2010

  50. [335]

    Rice, S., A. W. Lin, D. Safer, C. L. Hart, N. Naber, B. O. Carragher, S. M. Cain, E. Pechatnikova, E. M. Wilson- Kubalek, M. Whittaker, et al. (1999), Nature 402 (6763),

    1999

  51. [348]

    Brady, S. T. (1985), Nature 317 (6032),

    1985

  52. [350]

    Yildiz, A., J. N. Forkey, S. A. McKinney, T. Ha, Y. E. Gold- man, and P. R. Selvin (2003), Science 300 (5628),

    2003

  53. [352]

    M., and H

    Craig, E. M., and H. Linke (2009), Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 106 (43), 18261. 41 Crooks, G. E. (1998), Journal of Statistical Physics 90 (5-6),

    2009

  54. [368]

    Lipowsky (2011), Biophysical journal 100 (7),

    Bierbaum, V., and R. Lipowsky (2011), Biophysical journal 100 (7),

    2011

  55. [377]

    Altman, D., H. L. Sweeney, and J. A. Spudich (2004), Cell 116 (5),

    2004

  56. [386]

    Schnitzer, M. J., K. Visscher, and S. M. Block (2000), Nature cell biology 2 (10),

    2000

  57. [391]

    Lucius, A. L., N. K. Maluf, C. J. Fischer, and T. M. Lohman (2003), Biophysical journal 85 (4),

    2003

  58. [393]

    Andrecka, J., J. O. Arroyo, Y. Takagi, G. de Wit, A. Fineberg, L. MacKinnon, G. Young, J. R. Sellers, and P. Kukura (2015), Elife 4, e05413. Ariga, T., M. Tomishige, and D. Mizuno (2018), Physical review letters 121 (21), 218101. Astumian, R. D., and M. Bier (1996), Biophysica...

    2015

  59. [419]

    Gross, S. P., M. C. Tuma, S. W. Deacon, A. S. Serpinskaya, A. R. Reilein, and V. I. Gelfand (2002), The Journal of cell biology 156 (5),

    2002

  60. [422]

    L., and H

    Lebowitz, J. L., and H. Spohn (1999), Journal of Statistical Physics 95 (1-2),

    1999

  61. [424]

    Gingrich, T. R., J. M. Horowitz, N. Perunov, and J. L. Eng- land (2016), Physical review letters 116 (12), 120601. Gladrow, J., N. Fakhri, F. MacKintosh, C. Schmidt, and C. Broedersz (2016), Physical review letters 116 (24), 248301. Goldtzvik, Y., M. Hinczewski, and D. Thiruma...

    2016

  62. [430]

    Higuchi (2000), Nature 406 (6798),

    Endow, S., and H. Higuchi (2000), Nature 406 (6798),

    2000

  63. [431]

    Delagoutte, E., and P. H. Von Hippel (2003), Quarterly re- views of biophysics 36 (1),

    2003

  64. [433]

    Lionnet, X

    Dessinges, M.-N., T. Lionnet, X. G. Xi, D. Bensimon, and V. Croquette (2004), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (17),

    2004

  65. [435]

    Seifert (2008), EPL (Europhysics Let- ters) 83 (3), 30005

    Schmiedl, T., and U. Seifert (2008), EPL (Europhysics Let- ters) 83 (3), 30005. Schnakenberg, J. (1976), Reviews of Modern physics 48 (4),

    2008

  66. [442]

    Hill, T. L. (2005a), Free Energy Transduction and Biochemical Cycle Kinetics (Dover). Hill, T. L. (2005b), Free energy transduction and biochemical cycle kinetics (Dover Publications, Inc.). Hill, T. L., and Y.-D. Chen (1975), Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 72 (4),

    2005

  67. [445]

    D., and R

    Vale, R. D., and R. A. Milligan (2000), Science 288 (5463),

    2000

  68. [465]

    Itsathitphaisarn, O., R. A. Wing, W. K. Eliason, J. Wang, and T. A. Steitz (2012), Cell 151 (2),

    2012

  69. [471]

    Ha (1998), Theoretical and mathemat- ical models in polymer research , edited by A

    Thirumalai, D., and B. Ha (1998), Theoretical and mathemat- ical models in polymer research , edited by A. Y. Grosberg (Academic Press, Boston). Thirumalai, D., and C. Hyeon (2005), Biochemistry 44 (13),

    1998

  70. [480]

    Callen, H. B. (1985), Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics (Wiley). Caporizzo, M. A., C. E. Fishman, O. Sato, R. M. Jami- olkowski, M. Ikebe, and Y. E. Goldman (2018), Biophysical journal 114 (6),

    1985

  71. [482]

    Liu, C., X. Fu, L. Liu, X. Ren, C. K. Chau, S. Li, L. Xi- ang, H. Zeng, G. Chen, L.-H. Tang, et al. (2011), Science 334 (6053),

    2011

  72. [485]

    L., and A

    44 Sweeney, H. L., and A. Houdusse (2010), Annual review of biophysics 39,

    2010

  73. [487]

    Komori, M

    Ikezaki, K., T. Komori, M. Sugawa, Y. Arai, S. Nishikawa, A. H. Iwane, and T. Yanagida (2012), Small 8 (19),

    2012

  74. [539]

    Cates (2008), Physical review letters 100 (21), 218103

    Tailleur, J., and M. Cates (2008), Physical review letters 100 (21), 218103. Takaki, R., M. L. Mugnai, Y. Goldtzvik, and D. Thirumalai (2019), in preparation. Tehver, R., and D. Thirumalai (2008), J. Mol. Biol. 377,

    2008

  75. [559]

    Anderson, P. W. (1972), Science 177 (4047),

    1972

  76. [562]

    Jarmoskaite, and A

    Russell, R., I. Jarmoskaite, and A. M. Lambowitz (2013), RNA Biology 10 (1),

    2013

  77. [571]

    J., and S

    Schnitzer, M. J., and S. Block (1995), in Cold spring har- bor symposia on quantitative biology , Vol. 60 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press) pp. 793–802. Schnitzer, M. J., and S. M. Block (1997), Nature 388 (6640),

    1995

  78. [586]

    Yildiz, P

    Sakamoto, T., A. Yildiz, P. R. Selvin, and J. R. Sell- ers (2005), Biochemistry 44 (49), 16203, pMID: 16331980, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0512086. Sarlah, A., and A. Vilfan (2014), Biophys. J. 107 (3),

    2005 doi

  79. [590]

    Mehta, P., and D. J. Schwab (2012), Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 109 (44), 17978. Mickolajczyk, K. J., N. C. Deffenbaugh, J. O. Arroyo, J. An- drecka, P. Kukura, and W. O. Hancock (2015), Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (52), E7186. Mi...

    2012

  80. [604]

    Bell, G. I. (1978), Science 200 (4342),

    1978

  81. [628]

    Seifert (2012), New Journal of Physics 14 (10), 103023

    Zimmermann, E., and U. Seifert (2012), New Journal of Physics 14 (10), 103023

    2012

  82. [637]

    Manosas, W

    Bagchi, D., M. Manosas, W. Zhang, K. A. Manthei, S. Hodeib, B. Ducos, J. L. Keck, and V. Croquette (2018), Nucleic acids research 46 (16),

    2018

  83. [646]

    S., and H

    Rosenfeld, S. S., and H. Lee Sweeney (2004), Jour- nal of Biological Chemistry 279 (38), 40100, http://www.jbc.org/content/279/38/40100.full.pdf+html. Ross, J. L., K. Wallace, H. Shuman, Y. E. Goldman, and E. L. F. Holzbaur (2006), Nat. Cell. Biol. 8 (6),

    2004

  84. [651]

    T., H.-W

    Perkins, T. T., H.-W. Li, R. V. Dalal, J. Gelles, and S. M. Block (2004), Biophysical journal 86 (3),

    2004

  85. [662]

    Vilfan (2014), Biophysical journal 107 (3),

    ˇSarlah, A., and A. Vilfan (2014), Biophysical journal 107 (3),

    2014

  86. [675]

    (1999), Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 32 (44),

    Koza, Z. (1999), Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 32 (44),

    1999

  87. [676]

    Ha, and K

    Yu, J., T. Ha, and K. Schulten (2006), Biophys. J. 91 (6),

    2006

  88. [681]

    Song, Y., J. O. Park, L. Tanner, Y. Nagano, J. D. Rabinowitz, and S. Y. Shvartsman (2019), Current Biology 29 (12), R566. Spudich, J. A., and S. Sivaramakrishnan (2010), Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11 (2),

    2019

  89. [682]

    L., and Y

    Holzbaur, E. L., and Y. E. Goldman (2010), Current opinion in cell biology 22 (1),

    2010

  90. [737]

    J., and L

    Altschuler, S. J., and L. F. Wu (2010), Cell 141,

    2010

  91. [769]

    Moore, J. R., E. B. Krementsova, K. M. Trybus, and D. M. Warshaw (2004), Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motil- ity 25 (1),

    2004

  92. [778]

    Linder (2004), Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 5 (3),

    Rocak, S., and P. Linder (2004), Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 5 (3),

    2004

  93. [790]

    43 Oguchi, Y., S. V. Mikhailenko, T. Ohki, A. O. Olivares, E. M. De la Cruz, and S. Ishiwata (2008), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (22),

    2008

  94. [804]

    Walter, W. J., V. Ber´ anek, E. Fischermeier, and S. Diez (2012), PLoS One 7 (8), e42218. Wang, J., C. Herman, K. Tipton, C. Gross, and J. Weissman (2002), Cell 111 (7),

    2012

  95. [817]

    Klumpp (2019), Nano letters

    Sumi, T., and S. Klumpp (2019), Nano letters. Sun, Y., and Y. E. Goldman (2011a), Biophys. J. 101 (1),

    2019

  96. [855]

    Thirumalai (1995), Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules 36 (1),

    Guo, Z., and D. Thirumalai (1995), Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules 36 (1),

    1995

  97. [857]

    Russell (2007), Nature 449 (7165),

    Bhaskaran, H., and R. Russell (2007), Nature 449 (7165),

    2007

  98. [861]

    Veigel, C., F. Wang, M. L. Bartoo, J. R. Sellers, and J. E. Molloy (2002), Nature cell biology 4 (1),

    2002

  99. [879]

    Higuchi, and T

    Nishiyama, M., H. Higuchi, and T. Yanagida (2002), Nature Cell Biology 4 (10),

    2002

  100. [884]

    Oppenheim, I., K. E. Shuler, G. H. Weiss, et al. (1977), Stochastic processes in chemical physics (Mit Press). Ori-McKenney, K. M., J. Xu, S. P. Gross, and R. B. Vallee (2010), Nature cell biology 12 (12),

    1977

  101. [892]

    Thirumalai, and S

    Pan, J., D. Thirumalai, and S. A. Woodson (1997), Journal of molecular biology 273 (1),

    1997

  102. [897]

    Solomatin, S. V., M. Greenfeld, S. Chu, and D. Herschlag (2010), Nature 463,

    2010

  103. [905]

    D., and F

    Betterton, M. D., and F. J¨ ulicher (2003), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (25), 258103. Betterton, M. D., and F. J¨ ulicher (2005a), Phys Rev E71 (1 Pt 1), 011904. Betterton, M. D., and F. J¨ ulicher (2005b), J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 (47), S3851. Bhabha, G., H.-C. Cheng, N. Zhang, A...

    2003

  104. [913]

    Fei, X., X. Ye, N. A. LaRonde, and G. H. Lorimer (2014), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (35), 12775. Finer, J. T., R. M. Simmons, and J. A. Spudich (1994), Nature 368 (6467),

    2014

  105. [951]

    Liu, B., R. J. Baskin, and S. C. Kowalczykowski (2013), Nature 500,

    2013

  106. [952]

    Gaspard (2010), Biophysical Reviews and Letters 5 (04),

    Gerritsma, E., and P. Gaspard (2010), Biophysical Reviews and Letters 5 (04),

    2010

  107. [1014]

    R., and S

    Bianco, P. R., and S. C. Kowalczykowski (2000), Nature 405 (6784),

    2000

  108. [1020]

    Clemen, A. E. M., M. Vilfan, J. Jaud, J. S. Zhang, M. Bar- mann, and M. Rief (2005), Biophys. J. 88 (6),

    2005

  109. [1027]

    Zhang, D

    Wang, X., X. Zhang, D. Wu, Z. Huang, T. Hou, C. Jian, P. Yu, F. Lu, R. Zhang, T. Sun, et al. (2017), Elife 6, e23908. Wong, I., and T. M. Lohman (1992), Science 256 (5055),

    2017

  110. [1161]

    Jeong, Y.-J., M. K. Levin, and S. S. Patel (2004), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (19),

    2004

  111. [1168]

    S., and K

    Patel, S. S., and K. M. Picha (2000), Annual review of bio- chemistry 69 (1),

    2000

  112. [1183]

    Zalyte, L

    Schmidt, H., R. Zalyte, L. Urnavicius, and A. P. Carter (2015), Nature 518 (7539),

    2015

  113. [1216]

    Sasa (2006), Physical Review E 73 (2), 026131

    Harada, T., and S.-i. Sasa (2006), Physical Review E 73 (2), 026131. Hartman, M. A., D. Finan, S. Sivaramakrishnan, and J. A. Spudich (2011), Ann. Rev. Cell DEv. Biol. 27,

    2006

  114. [1228]

    Amor´ os, and J

    Ortega, A., D. Amor´ os, and J. G. de La Torre (2011), Bio- physical Journal 101 (4),

    2011

  115. [1248]

    Hyeon (2017), The journal of physical chemistry letters 8 (1),

    Hwang, W., and C. Hyeon (2017), The journal of physical chemistry letters 8 (1),

    2017

  116. [1269]

    Kad, N. M., K. M. Trybus, and D. M. Warshaw (2008), Journal of Biological Chemistry 283 (25), 17477, http://www.jbc.org/content/283/25/17477.full.pdf+html. Kiefhaber, T. (1995), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92 (20),

    2008

  117. [1279]

    Thirumalai (2010), Structure 18 (4),

    Tehver, R., and D. Thirumalai (2010), Structure 18 (4),

    2010

  118. [1291]

    L., and R

    Hill, T. L., and R. Simmons (1976), Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 73 (1),

    1976

  119. [1299]

    Ajdari, and J

    J¨ ulicher, F., A. Ajdari, and J. Prost (1997), Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 69 (4),

    1997

  120. [1357]

    Serpinskaya, E

    Levi, V., A. Serpinskaya, E. Gratton, and V. Gelfand (2006), Biophys. J. 90 (1),

    2006

  121. [1400]

    J., and R

    Carter, N. J., and R. Cross (2005), Nature 435 (7040),

    2005

  122. [1481]

    De la Cruz, E. M., E. M. Ostap, and H. L. Sweeney (2001), Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 (34), 32373. De la Cruz, Enrique M, M., A. L. Wells, S. S. Rosenfeld, E. M. Ostap, and H. L. Sweeney (1999), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96 (24), 13726. De La Cruz...

    2001

  123. [1627]

    Hartwell, L. H., J. J. Hopfield, S. Leibler, and A. W. Murray (1999), Nature 402 (6761supp), C47. Hathcock, D., R. Tehver, M. Hinczewski, and D. Thirumalai (2019), . Hertzano, R., E. Shalit, A. K. Rzadzinska, A. A. Dror, L. Song, U. Ron, J. T. Tan, A. S. Shitrit, H. Fuchs, T. H...

    1999

  124. [1640]

    Achouri, S

    Pierobon, P., S. Achouri, S. Courty, A. R. Dunn, J. A. Spu- dich, M. Dahan, and G. Cappello (2009), Biophys. J. 96 (10),

    2009

  125. [1642]

    B., and M

    Kolomeisky, A. B., and M. E. Fisher (2007), Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58,

    2007

  126. [1664]

    Imparato, and L

    Golubeva, N., A. Imparato, and L. Peliti (2012), Euro Phys. Lett. 97 (6), 60005. Gorbalenya, A. E., and E. V. Koonin (1993), Current opinion in structural biology 3 (3),

    2012

  127. [1747]

    Block, S. M. (2007), Biophysical journal 92 (9),

    2007

  128. [2061]

    Yildiz, A., H. Park, D. Safer, Z. Yang, L.-Q. Chen, P. R. Selvin, and H. L. Sweeney (2004a), Journal of Biological Chemistry 279 (36), 37223. Yildiz, A., M. Tomishige, A. Gennerich, and R. D. Vale (2008), Cell 134 (6),

    2004

  129. [2097]

    Zhang, Y., and A. B. Kolomeisky (2018), J. Phys. Chem. B 122 (13, SI),

    2018

  130. [2175]

    Hyeon, C., and J. N. Onuchic (2007b), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (44), 17382. Hyeon, C., and D. Thirumalai (2011), Nature communica- tions 2,

    2007

  131. [2224]

    Sigler, Z

    Ma, J., P. Sigler, Z. Xu, and M. Karplus (2000), J. Mol. Biol. 302 (2),

    2000

  132. [2259]

    Warshel (2013), Proc

    Mukherjee, S., and A. Warshel (2013), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 (43), 17326. Nam, W., and B. I. Epureanu (2016), PloS one 11 (1), e0147676. Nishikawa, S., I. Arimoto, K. Ikezaki, M. Sugawa, H. Ueno, T. Komori, A. H. Iwane, and T. Yanagida (2010), Cell 142 (6),

    2013

  133. [2351]

    Block, S. M., L. S. Goldstein, and B. J. Schnapp (1990), Nature 348 (6299),

    1990

  134. [2509]

    ¨Okten, Z., L. S. Churchman, R. S. Rock, and J. A. Spudich (2004), Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 11 (9),

    2004

  135. [2986]

    Block, S. M., C. L. Asbury, J. W. Shaevitz, and M. J. Lang (2003), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (5),

    2003

  136. [3035]

    Komori, and T

    Ikezaki, K., T. Komori, and T. Yanagida (2013), PloS one 8 (3), e58912. Inoue, A., J. Saito, R. Ikebe, and M. Ikebe (2002), Nature cell biology 4 (4),

    2013

  137. [3272]

    Goldtzvik, and D

    Zhang, Z., Y. Goldtzvik, and D. Thirumalai (2017), Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (46), E9838. Zhang, Z., and D. Thirumalai (2012), Structure 20 (4),

    2017

  138. [4030]

    Nakano (2012), Frontiers in plant sci- ence 3,

    Tominaga, M., and A. Nakano (2012), Frontiers in plant sci- ence 3,

    2012

  139. [4135]

    (2001), Mechanics of motor proteins and the cy- toskeleton (Sinauer associates Sunderland, MA)

    Howard, J. (2001), Mechanics of motor proteins and the cy- toskeleton (Sinauer associates Sunderland, MA). Howard, J. (2006), Current Biology 16 (14), R517. Howard, J., A. Hudspeth, and R. Vale (1989), Nature 342 (6246),

    2001

  140. [4232]

    Liepelt (2008), Journal of Statistical Physics 130 (1),

    Lipowsky, R., and S. Liepelt (2008), Journal of Statistical Physics 130 (1),

    2008

  141. [4268]

    Neri, ´E

    Pigolotti, S., I. Neri, ´E. Rold´ an, and F. J¨ ulicher (2017), Phys- ical review letters 119 (14), 140604. Pincus, D. L., S. Chakrabarti, and D. Thirumalai (2015), Biophysical Journal 109 (2),

    2017

  142. [4330]

    Lipowsky (2007a), Physical review letters 98 (25), 258102

    Liepelt, S., and R. Lipowsky (2007a), Physical review letters 98 (25), 258102. Liepelt, S., and R. Lipowsky (2007b), EPL (Europhysics Let- ters) 77 (5), 50002. Lionnet, T., A. Dawid, S. Bigot, F.-X. Barre, O. A. Saleh, F. Heslot, J.-F. Allemand, D. Bensimon, and V. Croquette (...

    2007

  143. [4402]

    Comstock, M. J., K. D. Whitley, H. Jia, J. Sokoloski, T. M. Lohman, T. Ha, and Y. R. Chemla (2015), Science 348 (6232),

    2015

  144. [4899]

    Hyeon, C., J. Lee, J. Yoon, S. Hohng, and D. Thirumalai (2012), Nat. Chem. 4,

    2012

  145. [4957]

    Hyeon, P

    Thirumalai, D., C. Hyeon, P. I. Zhuravlev, and G. H. Lorimer (2019), Chemical reviews 119 (12),

    2019

  146. [5001]

    Elting, M. W., Z. Bryant, J.-C. Liao, and J. A. Spudich (2011), Biophysical journal 100 (2),

    2011

  147. [5183]

    C., and U

    Barato, A. C., and U. Seifert (2015), Physical review letters 114 (15), 158101. Battle, C., C. P. Broedersz, N. Fakhri, V. F. Geyer, J. Howard, C. F. Schmidt, and F. C. MacKintosh (2016), Science 352 (6285),

    2015

  148. [5518]

    Marians, K. J. (2000), Structure 8 (12), R227. Mehta, A. D., R. S. Rock, M. Rief, J. A. Spudich, M. S. Mooseker, and R. E. Cheney (1999), Nature 400 (6744),

    2000

  149. [5542]

    Banerjee, K., A. B. Kolomeisky, and O. A. Igoshin (2017), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (20),

    2017

  150. [5544]

    Bennett, C. H. (1982), International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21 (12),

    1982

  151. [5741]

    Todd, M. J., G. H. Lorimer, and D. Thirumalai (1996), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93,

    1996

  152. [5902]

    Walker, M. L., S. A. Burgess, J. R. Sellers, F. Wang, J. A. Hammer III, J. Trinick, and P. J. Knight (2000), Nature 405 (6788),

    2000

  153. [6314]

    Hackney, D. D. (2005), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (51), 18338. Hancock, W. O. (2016), Biophysical journal 110 (6),

    2005

  154. [6327]

    A., and K

    Wagoner, J. A., and K. A. Dill (2019), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (13),

    2019

  155. [6439]

    DeWitt, M. A., A. Y. Chang, P. A. Combs, and A. Yildiz (2012), Science 335 (6065),

    2012

  156. [6788]

    Thirumalai, D., and G. H. Lorimer (2001), Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure 30 (1),

    2001

  157. [7264]

    Johnson, D. S., L. Bai, B. Y. Smith, S. S. Patel, and M. D. Wang (2007), Cell 129 (7),

    2007

  158. [7462]

    Dunn, A. R., P. Chuan, Z. Bryant, and J. A. Spudich (2010), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (17),

    2010

  159. [7637]

    (2002), arXiv preprint cond-mat/0207203

    Koza, Z. (2002), arXiv preprint cond-mat/0207203. Lan, G., P. Sartori, S. Neumann, V. Sourjik, and Y. Tu (2012), Nature physics 8 (5),

    2002 arXiv

  160. [7714]

    Oguchi, Y., S. V. Mikhailenko, T. Ohki, A. O. Olivares, E. M. De La Cruz, and S. Ishiwata (2010), Nature chemical bi- ology 6 (4),

    2010

  161. [7746]

    R., and J

    Dunn, A. R., and J. A. Spudich (2007), Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 14 (3),

    2007

  162. [7748]

    Qian (2010), Physical Review E 81 (5), 051133

    Ge, H., and H. Qian (2010), Physical Review E 81 (5), 051133. Gebhardt, J. C. M., A. E.-M. Clemen, J. Jaud, and M. Rief (2006), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (23),

    2010

  163. [8500]

    Trentham (1973), Biochemical Journal 133 (2),

    Bagshaw, C., and D. Trentham (1973), Biochemical Journal 133 (2),

    1973

  164. [8680]

    Gennerich, A., A. P. Carter, S. L. Reck-Peterson, and R. D. Vale (2007), Cell 131 (5),

    2007

  165. [9029]

    Thirumalai (2015), Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 87 (1),

    Kirkpatrick, T., and D. Thirumalai (2015), Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 87 (1),

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.