Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving Utility and Security of the Shuffler-based Differential Privacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.11515 v3 pith:HUW4CVET submitted 2019-08-30 cs.CR cs.DBcs.DScs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.DBcs.DScs.LG
keywords privacyaggregatorassumptionbetterdifferentialimprovinginformationintermediate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When collecting information, local differential privacy (LDP) alleviates privacy concerns of users because their private information is randomized before being sent it to the central aggregator. LDP imposes large amount of noise as each user executes the randomization independently. To address this issue, recent work introduced an intermediate server with the assumption that this intermediate server does not collude with the aggregator. Under this assumption, less noise can be added to achieve the same privacy guarantee as LDP, thus improving utility for the data collection task. This paper investigates this multiple-party setting of LDP. We analyze the system model and identify potential adversaries. We then make two improvements: a new algorithm that achieves a better privacy-utility tradeoff; and a novel protocol that provides better protection against various attacks. Finally, we perform experiments to compare different methods and demonstrate the benefits of using our proposed method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools