Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references

AC charge transport in holographic Horndeski gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a holographic Horndeski gravity model with momentum relaxation produces a metal-semiconductor crossover, and that in the slow-relaxation regime its AC conductivity is fitted by the Drude formula.

desk verdict Plausible but under-documented AC extension; the Drude-fit claim rests on numerics that the paper never describes, so the result is interesting but not yet convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00224 v1 pith:RJ7LTFKQ submitted 2019-08-31 hep-th gr-qc

Xi-Jing Wang , Hai-Shan Liu , Wei-Jia Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords holographicdualityHorndeskigravityACconductivityDCDrudeformulasemiconductor-metaltransitionmomentumrelaxationblackholetransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies electric transport in a four-dimensional holographic Horndeski gravity model in which two axion fields with constant gradients break translation invariance and provide momentum relaxation. Its central claim is that the Horndeski coupling $\gamma$ controls the temperature profile of the DC conductivity: at $\gamma=0$ the system is metallic, at the critical value $\gamma=1/3$ it behaves like a semiconductor, and just below critical there is a crossover temperature at which the system switches from semiconductor-like to metal-like behavior. Extending the calculation to AC transport, the paper reports that the real part of the AC conductivity has a Drude-like low-frequency peak, and that in the slow-relaxation regime the numerical conductivity is well described by $\sigma(\omega)=\sigma_{DC}/(1-i\omega\tau_{rel})$ with the relaxation time taken from a hydrodynamic formula. If these claims are right, the model gives a minimal holographic mechanism for semiconductor-metal transitions in strongly coupled systems, with one coupling controlling the behavior.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Horndeski interaction term $\gamma G_{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\varphi_i\partial_\nu\varphi_i$ added to the Einstein-Maxwell action, with axion fields $\varphi_i=kx_i$ whose constant gradients supply momentum relaxation. Its effect on transport enters through the effective graviton mass at the horizon, $M_h^2=k^2/u_h^2-\gamma\left(4\pi k^2 T e^{-\gamma k^2 u_h^2/4}/u_h\right)$, which appears in $\sigma_{DC}=1+q^2/M_h^2$ and in the hydrodynamic relaxation rate $\tau_{rel}^{-1}=sM_h^2/[2\pi(sT+\mu q)]$. The AC calculation solves the linearized perturbation equations for $\delta g_{tx}$, $\delta A_x$, and $\delta \varphi_x$, reduces them to two coupled ordinary differential equations, and reads the conductivity from the boundary expansion $a_x=a_x^{(0)}+a_x^{(1)}u+\cdots$ as $\sigma(\omega)=-ia_x^{(1)}/(\omega a_x^{(0)})$. The Drude fits use $\tau_{rel}$ computed from these horizon data, with entropy density $s=4\pi(1-\gamma k^2u_h^2/2)/u_h^2$.

What would settle it

Independently integrate equations (A1) and (A2) with infalling boundary conditions at the horizon and the holographic source/current expansion at the boundary for the same parameters as in Figures 4 and 7; if the resulting $\sigma(\omega)$ differs from the published curves, or if the low-frequency pole is not at $\omega=-i/\tau_{rel}$, the central claims fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors work with the Horndeski action in which Einstein-Maxwell theory is augmented by two axion fields whose coupling to the Einstein tensor has strength $\gamma$, and they set the axion gradients to a constant $k$ to provide momentum relaxation. Their central result is that the DC conductivity, $\sigma_{DC}=1+q^2/M_h^2$, changes its temperature dependence as $\gamma$ passes the critical value $\gamma=1/3$: for $\gamma=0$ it decreases with temperature (metal-like), for $\gamma=1/3$ it increases monotonically and approximately follows the Steinhart-Hart equation (semiconductor-like), and for $\gamma$ just below $1/3$ there is a finite-temperature crossover between the two behaviors. The new numerical calculation of AC transport shows a low-frequency Drude peak that does not become an off-axis peak, and in the slow-relaxation limit the real and imaginary parts of the AC conductivity are both well fitted by $\sigma(\omega)=\sigma_{DC}/(1-i\omega\tau_{rel})$, with $\tau_{rel}$ obtained from the hydrodynamic relaxation rate. These results are offered as evidence that the model could provide a mechanism for a semiconductor-metal transition driven by the Horndeski coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's new AC-conductivity results rest on the unstated reliability of the numerical integration of the coupled perturbation equations in the appendix, since no boundary conditions, numerical scheme, or error estimates are provided; if that integration is inaccurate, the reported AC curves and Drude fits are not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the critical coupling $\gamma=1/3$, the model predicts a DC conductivity that rises monotonically with temperature and roughly obeys the Steinhart-Hart equation, providing a holographic analogue of a semiconductor.
  • For $\gamma$ below the critical value, the model predicts a finite-temperature crossover from semiconductor-like to metal-like DC transport, with the crossover temperature fixed by the Horndeski coupling.
  • In the slow-relaxation regime, the AC conductivity is Drude-like, so the model gives a single-parameter description of both the real and imaginary parts of $\sigma(\omega)$ across the crossover.
  • The absence of an off-axis low-frequency peak separates this model from certain massive-gravity models that exhibit such peaks at metal-insulator transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next check is to repeat the AC numerics at smaller momentum-relaxation strength $k$, where the hydrodynamic formula for $\tau_{rel}$ is on safer ground, and compare the pole of the numerically extracted $\sigma(\omega)$ with the Drude relaxation rate; this would separate the genuine prediction from the fitting procedure.
  • The high-temperature relaxation rate $\tau_{rel}^{-1}\propto(1-3\gamma)T$ implies that on the metallic side of the crossover the resistivity is linear in temperature, connecting the model to the linear-$T$ resistivity often discussed for strongly coupled systems; the paper does not spell this out.
  • Because the mechanism is controlled by a single coupling rather than by an external lattice or impurity density, the same kind of critical-parameter structure could appear in other holographic models and deserves a systematic scan of the phase diagram in the ($\gamma$, $T$) plane.
  • The reported Drude fits at $T=0.1$ for several couplings suggest the description may hold throughout the semiconducting side, not only at isolated points; mapping its range of validity is a test the authors leave implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies AC charge transport in a four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-Horndeski model with two axion fields providing momentum relaxation. It first reviews the analytic black hole background and the analytic DC conductivity (Eqs. (12)-(18)), then solves the linearized perturbation equations (A1)-(A2) numerically to obtain the frequency-dependent optical conductivity from Eq. (26). The authors report that the DC conductivity exhibits metallic, semiconducting, and nonmonotonic temperature behavior depending on the Horndeski coupling, and that in the slow-relaxation regime the AC conductivity is well described by the Drude formula with the hydrodynamic relaxation time of Eq. (29). The central qualitative claims are that the Horndeski coupling drives a metal-semiconductor-like transition and that the low-frequency AC response in the slow-relaxation cases is Drude-like.

Significance. If the numerical results are reliable, the paper provides a simple holographic model of a coupling-driven metal-semiconductor crossover and demonstrates that the AC conductivity follows the Drude form in a higher-derivative holographic theory. The analytic DC part is solid: the DC conductivity (17) is derived from a conserved current and is not fitted to the transport coefficients. The numerical AC calculation is also not a fit of the conductivity itself; it is obtained from the bulk equations. The paper is a useful step beyond earlier DC-only analyses of Horndeski holography [41,42]. However, the significance is moderated by the absence of numerical method details, convergence checks, and error estimates, which limits the reproducibility of the central AC claims. The Steinhart-Hart and Drude comparisons are presented qualitatively and lack quantitative measures of goodness of fit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III and Appendix A] The AC conductivity, which is the central new result, rests entirely on a numerical integration of the coupled ODEs (A1)-(A2), but the manuscript does not state the boundary conditions imposed at the horizon and at the AdS boundary, the integration scheme, or any convergence or error estimates. In particular, it is not stated how the ingoing-wave condition is implemented, how the source of the χ fluctuation is set to zero, or how the normalization a_x^(0)=1 is fixed. The only numerical check shown, Fig. 3, compares the ω→0 limit with the analytic DC formula (17); that verifies the static limit but cannot validate the frequency dependence that underlies the Drude-fit claim. This issue is load-bearing for the abstract's main claims.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (29)] The Drude comparison in Fig. 7 uses the hydrodynamic relaxation time (29), which the text says is valid for small k. However, all computations fix k=1/2 with q=1 and Λ=-3, and the smallness of k is never quantified. Since τ_rel enters the Drude curves, the apparent agreement in Fig. 7 could be an artifact of applying the small-k formula outside its domain. The authors should justify the small-k approximation at their parameters, compute τ_rel directly from the numerical data, or provide a k-dependence study.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (19) and Fig. 2] The classification of the γ=1/3 curve as semiconductor-like relies on subtracting the zero-temperature conductivity contribution before fitting the Steinhart-Hart equation (19). This subtraction is introduced without independent justification, and the fit coefficients A, B, and C are not related to any microscopic quantity. Because the metal-semiconductor transition is one of the two headline claims, this ad hoc step should be either justified or explicitly reframed as a qualitative analogy rather than a quantitative fit.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III, figure captions and text] The notation 'γ=1/3.01' and 'γ=1/3.05' is ambiguous: it could be read as γ=1/3+0.01 rather than γ=1/3.01 (i.e., 1/(3.01)). Please use explicit fractions or decimals to avoid confusion.
  2. [Sec. II] The phrase 'Klein-Golden equation' should be 'Klein-Gordon equation'.
  3. [Sec. III] The statement that in the high-frequency limit the real part of the AC conductivity approaches a nonzero constant is not supported by the plotted frequency range, which extends only to ω/q=0.2; please either show higher frequencies or soften the claim.
  4. [Sec. III, Fig. 5] The transition temperature Tc=0.35 is introduced without a definition; please state how Tc is extracted from σ_DC(T).
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues, for example 'dependance' should be 'dependence' and the Fig. 1 caption contains the phrase 'firstly worked out'. A careful proofread would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the AC conductivity is computed from the bulk equations, and the self-cited DC background is independently checked in Fig. 3.

full rationale

The central AC result is obtained by numerically integrating the linearized bulk equations (A1)-(A2), which are derived from the Horndeski action, and the conductivity is read off from the boundary asymptotics (25)-(26); it is not constructed from the Drude formula or from any fitted parameter. The relaxation time in Eq. (29) is taken from independent work [20] and is computed from background quantities, so the subsequent Drude comparison is a consistency check (the paper calls it a fit) rather than a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The self-referential elements are the background solution and the DC formula (17)-(18) and entropy (30) taken from [41,42], which include co-authors of this paper; however, Fig. 3 independently checks the DC formula by direct numerical solution of (21)-(23), so these self-citations are not load-bearing. The Steinhart-Hart comparison is a phenomenological fit to the DC curve, not a derivation. The main weakness is that the Appendix gives the simplified equations without boundary conditions, integration scheme, or convergence tests, and the small-k assumption behind Eq. (29) is applied at k=1/2 without quantification; these are reproducibility and validity concerns, not circularity. No step in the paper reduces Eq. X to Eq. Y by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. Its central AC claim depends on a numerical solution whose details are absent, and its phenomenological fits (Drude, Steinhart-Hart) use fitted parameters. The DC background and DC conductivity formula are imported from prior work without reproduction.

free parameters (2)
  • Steinhart-Hart coefficients A, B, C = A=15.7127, B=3.48369, C=0.0002147
    Three coefficients fitted to the DC conductivity curve at γ=1/3 (Eq. 19) to support the semiconductor interpretation.
  • Drude relaxation time τ_rel = not stated (fitted in Fig. 7)
    The blue dashed curves in Fig. 7 are described as results fitted by the Drude formula, so τ_rel is treated as a fitting parameter. A hydrodynamic value from Eq. (29) is also computed, but the plot shows a fit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The AdS/CFT dictionary maps the leading and subleading coefficients of the bulk Maxwell field at the boundary to the source and expectation value of the dual current (Eqs. 25-26).
    Standard holographic dictionary used to extract conductivity; not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption The DC conductivity formula (17) from Ref. [42] is valid for this Horndeski model.
    The paper relies on this prior analytic result; the AC computation is the new contribution.
  • domain assumption The hydrodynamic relaxation time formula (29) from Ref. [20] applies in the slow relaxation regime.
    Used to interpret the Drude fits, but the numerical data are fitted directly, so the formula is not central to the fit.
  • domain assumption The stability bound -∞ < γ ≤ -1/Λ from Ref. [41] restricts the parameter range.
    With Λ=-3, this gives γ ≤ 1/3; the critical value sits at the edge of this range.
  • ad hoc to paper The zero-temperature conductivity contribution is constant and can be subtracted before fitting the Steinhart-Hart equation.
    The subtraction is introduced to make the semiconductor fit work (Section III, before Eq. 19) and is not derived from the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AC charge transport in holographic Horndeski gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RJ7LTFKQ

@misc{pith2026190900224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AC charge transport in holographic Horndeski gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RJ7LTFKQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00224}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate the AC charge transport in the holographic Horndeski gravity and identify a metal-semiconductor like transition that is driven by the Horndeski coupling. Moreover, we fit our numeric data by the Drude formula in slow relaxation cases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00224 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: DC conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Red solid line is the result of holographic theory without the zero temperature conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The dependance of the real part of AC conductivity on frequency for different temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Relaxation rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The real (top) and imaginary (bottom) parts of the AC conductivity for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hartnoll, Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics , Class

    S.A. Hartnoll, Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics , Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 224002 (2009), arXiv:0903.3246 [hep-th]. 13

    arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    TASI lectures on quantum matter (with a view toward holographic duality)

    J. McGreevy, TASI lectures on quantum matter (with a view toward holographic duality) , arXiv:1606.08953 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [3]

    Hartnoll, A

    S.A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev, Holographic quantum matter, MIT press

    work page

  4. [4]

    Baggioli, A Practical Mini-Course on Applied Holography , arXiv:1908.02667 [hep-th]

    M. Baggioli, A Practical Mini-Course on Applied Holography , arXiv:1908.02667 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1908

  5. [5]

    Horowitz, J.E

    G.T. Horowitz, J.E. Santos and D. Tong, Optical Conductivity with Holographic Lattices , JHEP 1207, 168 (2012), arXiv:1204.0519 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Horowitz, J.E

    G.T. Horowitz, J.E. Santos and D. Tong, Further Evidence for Lattice-Induced Scaling, JHEP 1211, 102 (2012) arXiv:1209.1098 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    Horowitz and J.E

    G.T. Horowitz and J.E. Santos, General Relativity and the Cuprates , JHEP 1306, 087 (2013) ,arXiv:1302.6586 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Donos and J.P

    A. Donos and J.P. Gauntlett, Holographic Q-lattices, JHEP 1404, 040 (2014), arXiv:1311.3292 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2014

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Ling, P. Liu, C. Niu, J.P. Wu and Z.Y. Xian, Holographic Superconductor on Q-lattice , JHEP 1502, 059 (2015), arXiv:1410.6761 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    X.H. Ge, Y. Tian, S.Y. Wu and S.F. Wu, Linear and quadratic in temperature resistivity from holography, JHEP 1611, 128 (2016), arXiv:1606.07905 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    X.H. Ge, Y. Ling, C. Niu and S.J. Sin, Thermoelectric conductivities, shear viscosity, and stability in an anisotropic linear axion model, Phys. Rev. D92, 106005 (2015), arXiv:1412.8346 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Cremonini, H.S

    S. Cremonini, H.S. Liu, H. L¨ u and C.N. Pope,DC Conductivities from Non-Relativistic Scaling Geometries with Momentum Dissipation , arXiv:1608.04394 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Chesler, A

    P. Chesler, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev, Conformal field theories in a periodic potential: results from holography and field theory , Phys. Rev. D 89, 026005 (2014), arXiv:1308.0329 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Gout´ eraux,Charge transport in holography with momentum dissipation , JHEP 1404, 181 (2014), arXiv:1401.5436 [hep-th]

    B. Gout´ eraux,Charge transport in holography with momentum dissipation , JHEP 1404, 181 (2014), arXiv:1401.5436 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Rangamani, M

    M. Rangamani, M. Rozali and D. Smyth, Spatial Modulation and Conductivities in Effective Holographic Theories, JHEP 1507, 024 (2015), arXiv:1505.05171 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Y. Ling, C. Niu, J.P. Wu and Z.Y. Xian, Holographic Lattice in Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton Gravity, JHEP 1311, 006 (2013), arXiv:1309.4580 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Donos and J.P

    A. Donos and J.P. Gauntlett, The thermoelectric properties of inhomogeneous holographic lattices, JHEP 1501, 035 (2015), arXiv:1409.6875 [hep-th]. 14

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Andrade and B

    T. Andrade and B. Withers, A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation , JHEP 1405, 101 (2014), arXiv:1311.5157 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Gout´ eraux, E

    B. Gout´ eraux, E. Kiritsis and W.J. Li,Effective holographic theories of momentum relaxation and violation of conductivity bound , JHEP 1604, 122 (2016), arXiv:1602.01067[hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Davison, Momentum relaxation in holographic massive gravity , Phys

    R.A. Davison, Momentum relaxation in holographic massive gravity , Phys. Rev. D 88, 086003 (2013), arXiv:1306.5792 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Blake and D

    M. Blake and D. Tong, Universal Resistivity from Holographic Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 88, 106004 (2013), arXiv:1308.4970 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Baggioli and O

    M. Baggioli and O. Pujol` as, Electron-Phonon Interactions, Metal-Insulator Transitions, and Holographic Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 251602 (2015), arXiv:1411.1003 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Alberte, M

    L. Alberte, M. Ammon, M. Baggioli, A. Jim´ enez and O. Pujol` as, Black hole elasticity and gapped transverse phonons in holography, JHEP 1801, 129 (2018), arXiv:1708.08477 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space , Int

    G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 363 (1974)

    1974

  17. [25]

    Kobayashi, Horndeski theory and beyond: a review , Rept

    T. Kobayashi, Horndeski theory and beyond: a review , Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019) no.8, 086901, arXiv:1901.07183 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, The Galileon as a local modification of gravity , Phys. Rev. D 79, 064036 (2009), arXiv:0811.2197 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Deffayet, X

    C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D. A. Steer and G. Zahariade, From k-essence to generalised Galileons , Phys. Rev. D 84, 064039 (2011), [arXiv:1103.3260 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J

    D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J. Math. Phys. 12, 498 (1971)

    1971

  21. [29]

    Anabalon, A

    A. Anabalon, A. Cisterna and J. Oliva, Asymptotically locally AdS and flat black holes in Horndeski theory, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084050 (2014), arXiv:1312.3597 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Cisterna and C

    A. Cisterna and C. Erices, Asymptotically locally AdS and flat black holes in the presence of an electric field in the Horndeski scenario , Phys. Rev. D 89, 084038 (2014), arXiv:1401.4479 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Feng, H.S

    X.H. Feng, H.S. Liu, H. L¨ u and C.N. Pope, Black Hole Entropy and Viscosity Bound in Horndeski Gravity, JHEP 1511, 176 (2015), arXiv:1509.07142 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Feng, H.S

    X.H. Feng, H.S. Liu, H. L¨ u and C. N. Pope, Thermodynamics of Charged Black Holes in Einstein-Horndeski-Maxwell Theory, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044030 (2016),arXiv:1512.02659 [hep- th]. 15

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Jim´ enez, R

    J.B. Jim´ enez, R. Durrer, L. Heisenberg and M. Thorsrud,Stability of Horndeski vector-tensor interactions, JCAP 1310, 064 (2013), arXiv:1308.1867 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kobayashi, H

    T. Kobayashi, H. Motohashi and T. Suyama, Black hole perturbation in the most general scalar-tensor theory with second-order field equations II: the even-parity sector , Phys. Rev. D 89, 084042 (2014), arXiv:1402.6740 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Minamitsuji, Causal structure in the scalar-tensor theory with field derivative coupling to the Einstein tensor , Phys

    M. Minamitsuji, Causal structure in the scalar-tensor theory with field derivative coupling to the Einstein tensor , Phys. Lett. B 743, 272 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Y. Z. Li and H. Lu, a-theorem for Horndeski gravity at the critical point , Phys. Rev. D 97, no. 12, 126008 (2018), [arXiv:1803.08088 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Kuang and E

    X.M. Kuang and E. Papantonopoulos, Building a Holographic Superconductor with a Scalar Field Coupled Kinematically to Einstein Tensor , JHEP 1608, 161 (2016), arXiv:1607.04928 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Caceres, R

    E. Caceres, R. Mohan and P.H. Nguyen, On holographic entanglement entropy of Horndeski black holes, JHEP 1710, 145 (2017), arXiv:1707.06322 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Feng and H.S

    X.H. Feng and H.S. Liu, Holographic Complexity Growth Rate in Horndeski Theory , Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no. 1, 40 (2019), arXiv:1811.03303 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Y.Z. Li, H. L¨ u and H.Y. Zhang,Scale Invariance vs. Conformal Invariance: Holographic Two- Point Functions in Horndeski Gravity , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no.7, 592 (2019), arXiv:1812.05123 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Jiang, H.S

    W.J. Jiang, H.S. Liu, H. L¨ u and C.N. Pope, DC Conductivities with Momentum Dissipation in Horndeski Theories , JHEP 1707, 084 (2017), arXiv:1703.00922 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Baggioli and W.J

    M. Baggioli and W.J. Li, Diffusivities Bounds and Chaos in Holographic Horndeski Theories , JHEP 1707, 055 (2017), arXiv:1705.01766 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Grozdanov, A

    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas and K. Schalm, Incoherent thermal transport from dirty black holes , Phys. Rev. D 93, 061901 (2016), arXiv:1511.05970 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Liu, Violation of Thermal Conductivity Bound in Horndeski Theory , Phys

    H.S. Liu, Violation of Thermal Conductivity Bound in Horndeski Theory , Phys. Rev. D 98, 061902 (2018), arXiv:1804.06502 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Amoretti, A

    A. Amoretti, A. Braggio, N. Maggiore, N. Magnoli and D. Musso, Analytic DC thermo- electric conductivities in Holography with massive gravitons , Phys. Rev. D 91, 025002 (2015), arXiv:1407.0306 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Donos and J.P

    A. Donos and J.P. Gauntlett, Thermoelectric DC conductivities from black hole horizons , 16 JHEP 1411, 081 (2014), arXiv:1406.4742 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Iqbal and H

    N. Iqbal and H. Liu, Universality of the hydrodynamic limit in AdS/CFT and the membrane paradigm, Phys. Rev. D 79, 025023 (2009), arXiv:0809.3808 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Donos and J.P

    A. Donos and J.P. Gauntlett, Navier-Stokes Equations on Black Hole Horizons and DC Ther- moelectric Conductivity, Phys. Rev. D 92, 121901 (2015), arXiv:1506.01360 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Steinhart and S.R

    J.S. Steinhart and S.R. Hart, Calibration curves for thermistors , Deep-Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, Volume 15, Issue 4, August 1968, Pages 497-503, ISSN 0011-7471, doi:10.1016/0011-7471(68)90057-0

    1968 doi

  42. [50]

    Hartnoll, C.P

    S.A. Hartnoll, C.P. Herzog and G.T. Horowitz, Building an Holographic Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 031601 (2008), arXiv:0803.3295 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Alberte, M

    L. Alberte, M. Ammon, M. Baggioli, A. Jim´ enez-Alba, and O. Pujol` as,Holographic Phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 171602 (2018), arXiv:1711.03100 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Li, and J.P

    W.J. Li, and J.P. Wu, A simple holographic model for spontaneous breaking of translational symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 243 (2019), arXiv:1808.03142 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Menth, E

    A. Menth, E. Buehler, and T.H. Geballe, Magnetic and semiconducting properties of SmB6, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, (1969) 295-297

    1969

  46. [54]

    Laurita, C.M

    N.J. Laurita, C.M. Morris, S.M. Koohpayeh, W.A. Phelan, T.M, McQueen, and N.P. Ar- mitage, Impurities or a neutral Fermi surface? A further examination of the low-energy ac optical conductivity ofSmB6, Physica B: Condensed Matter 536, 78 (2018). arXiv:1709.01508 [cond-mat.str-el]. 17

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.