Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Brane Webs and Magnetic Quivers for SQCD

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the Higgs variety of SU(Nc) SQCD is exactly the union of mesonic and baryonic cones whose Hilbert series are computed from magnetic quivers read off five-brane webs, with nilpotent operators removed by taking…

desk verdict A genuine advance: the scheme/variety distinction and radical computation are the real payoff, and the brane-web checks are honest, but the general claims are conjectural and the paper says so. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00667 v2 pith:BASQO2N6 submitted 2019-09-02 hep-th

Antoine Bourget , Santiago Cabrera , Julius F. Grimminger , Amihay Hanany , Zhenghao Zhong This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords five-branewebsmagneticquiversHiggsbranchSQCDHilbertseriesnilpotentoperatorsradicalidealssymplecticsingularities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the classical Higgs branch of 4d N=2 SQCD with SU(Nc) gauge group and Nf flavours is not a single geometric object but a union of two cones, the mesonic and baryonic branches, with a nontrivial intersection. The authors compute the Hilbert series of every cone and intersection from magnetic quivers obtained by decomposing five-brane webs, and show that these results agree exactly with the hyper-Kähler quotient computation once nilpotent operators are removed by taking the radical. The previously puzzling nilpotent operators in the Higgs ring are precisely the difference between the scheme and its reduced variety, and the paper conjectures Hilbert series for the full scheme including these multiplicities. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a practical combinatorial way to compute Higgs-branch geometry for arbitrary Nf and Nc, where direct Gröbner-basis methods become unfeasible beyond rank five.

What carries the argument

The magnetic quiver: a quiver with unitary gauge nodes, read off from a tropical five-brane web by decomposing the web into subwebs and computing stable intersection numbers between subwebs; its 3d N=4 Coulomb branch Hilbert series (via the monopole formula) describes one cone of the Higgs branch. The radical ideal plays the complementary role: taking the radical of the ideal generated by the meson-baryon relations removes nilpotent operators and yields the same Hilbert series as the brane-web computation, thereby identifying the geometric variety.

What would settle it

Compute the Higgs variety of SU(5) with Nf = 6 directly: evaluate the radical of the ideal generated by relations (2.13)-(2.19) and its Hilbert series, and compare with the paper's conjectured formula (5.46)-(5.47) or the brane-web result. A disagreement, or a nilpotent operator not captured by the conjectured multiplicity terms, would falsify the general picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Higgs variety of SU(Nc) SQCD—the reduced geometric object, with nilpotent elements quotiented out—is exactly the union of cones predicted by magnetic quivers read from finite-coupling five-brane webs. Each maximal decomposition of the web into subwebs yields a magnetic quiver whose 3d Coulomb branch, computed by the monopole formula, is one irreducible cone: the mesonic cone for one decomposition and the baryonic cone for the other, with non-maximal decompositions giving their intersection. The Hilbert series assembled by inclusion-exclusion from these cones reproduce the radical of the ideal generated by the meson-baryon relations (2.13)-(2.19). The nilpotent operators of the Higgs ring, such as Tr(M) in the purely mesonic case, are shown to generate the radical ideal, and conjectural formulas for the full Higgs-scheme Hilbert series, including multiplicities of orbits, are proposed for Nf < Nc and Nc ≤ Nf ≤ 2Nc-1.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the conjecture from earlier work that every decomposition of a five-brane web into subwebs produces a magnetic quiver whose 3d Coulomb branch is a cone of the Higgs branch with the correct Hilbert series; if that dictionary fails, the brane-web Hilbert series in this paper lack support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Higgs variety for generic SU(Nc) with Nf flavors is described completely by a small set of magnetic quivers for all ranges of Nf, as summarized in the paper's Table 6 and Figures 8–20.
  • The global symmetry of each cone, including the baryonic U(1), is read directly from the quiver's unitary nodes and the refined Hilbert series.
  • The nilpotent part of the Hilbert series is exactly the difference between the hyper-Kähler quotient and the brane-web result, giving an alternative to primary decomposition algorithms.
  • Conjectured Hilbert series for the full Higgs scheme, including multiplicities of the cones, are given for Nf < Nc and for Nc ≤ Nf ≤ 2Nc−1.
  • The method is computationally much lighter than Gröbner-basis calculations and extends to arbitrary Nf and Nc.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The scheme-versus-variety distinction suggests that different powers of a nilpotent operator label distinct vacua that the paper leaves open to interpret physically, possibly through a tunnelling mechanism between them.
  • The same magnetic-quiver technique could be applied to Higgs branches of other gauge groups, such as SO or Sp SQCD, where the pattern of nilpotent operators and cone decomposition may differ.
  • The conjectured multiplicity rule, that the multiplicity of an intersection is the minimum of the multiplicities of the intersecting components, is testable in the next uncomputed case, SU(5) with 6 flavours.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper revisits the classical Higgs branch of 4d N=2 SQCD with gauge group SU(Nc) and Nf fundamental flavours. It distinguishes the 'Higgs scheme' (coordinate ring C[M,B,B~]/I containing nilpotent operators) from the 'Higgs variety' (reduced ring C[M,B,B~]/sqrt(I)), and proposes that brane-web/magnetic-quiver computations describe the latter. The authors compute Hilbert series by hyper-Kahler quotient for low ranks (Table 4 for 2 <= Nc <= 5 and 1 <= Nf <= 4), and by the monopole formula for magnetic quivers read off five-brane webs for general Nf and Nc. They verify in small cases that the brane-web Hilbert series equals the Hilbert series of the radical of the meson-baryon relations, identify nilpotent operators such as Tr(M) and Tr(M)M' in the pure-mesonic cases, and propose general conjectural formulas (5.42)-(5.52) for the full Hilbert series including finite multiplicity factors and baryonic intersections.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper gives a clean geometric interpretation: the reduced Higgs branch of SU(Nc) SQCD is a union of mesonic and baryonic cones, each a Coulomb branch of a magnetic quiver, and the previously puzzling nilpotent operators are exactly the difference between the scheme and its radical. The explicit low-rank comparisons are a useful data set, the radical computations for Nf <= 4 are concrete and machine-checked with Macaulay2, and the magnetic-quiver/Hasse-diagram classification is a valuable contribution. The brane-web Hilbert series are not circularly derived from the hyper-Kahler quotient; they are independent predictions checked against it. However, the general validity rests on the unproven Conjecture 1 of [19] and on the completeness of the meson-baryon relations, and the multiplicity formulas in Section 5 are reverse-engineered conjectures. The significance is therefore high if the conjectures are subsequently proved, but the current paper establishes the central claim only in low-rank cases.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A / Section 3.5] The general brane-web predictions (Figures 8-20, Table 6, and the Hilbert series used in Sections 4 and 5) all rest on Conjecture 1 of [19], reviewed in Appendix A but not proved here. The direct checks of the radical prescription cover only Nf <= 4 and Nc <= 5 (Table 4 and Sections 4.1-4.3), and in those cases the relevant spaces are already known nilpotent orbit closures or small baryonic extensions. Consequently, the Section 6 statement that 'we have shown ... perfect agreement with the geometry predicted by the techniques of brane webs' overstates what is established; the honest conclusion is that agreement holds in all computable low-rank cases and is conjectured in general. Please either prove or cite a proof of the conjecture for the finite-coupling webs used here, or explicitly restrict the paper's central claims to the checked regime.
  2. [Section 5.3, Eqs. (5.42)-(5.52)] The general formulas for the full Higgs-branch Hilbert series, including finite factors and intersection multiplicities, are conjectures reverse-engineered from the difference HSHK - HSBraneWeb in the examples of Sections 5.1 and 5.2. The paper itself notes in Section 5.3.2 that the simplest case with simultaneously non-trivial nilpotent operators and non-trivial mesonic/baryonic intersection, SU(5) with Nf = 6, is already out of reach with standard computers. As written, Section 6 presents these as established results. I recommend either presenting Section 5.3 explicitly as conjectural in the abstract, introduction, and conclusions, or providing at least one additional non-trivial check (for example a refined Hilbert series comparison) before presenting them as proven.
  3. [Section 4.1, Eqs. (4.2)-(4.3)] The reduction from Q~Q - (1/Nc)Tr(Q~Q) = 0 to M^2 = 0 for Nf < Nc relies on the claim that the quotient ring structure does not change when alpha = 1/Nc is varied continuously to alpha = 0. The paper states that this was observed by comparing Hilbert series using Macaulay2, not by proving an isomorphism of rings. Since the subsequent analysis of nilpotent operators (for example Tr(M) for Nf = 2) depends on this identification, the unproved alpha-deformation is load-bearing. Please either prove the ring isomorphism or the Hilbert-series equality for all Nf < Nc, or modify the derivation so that it does not depend on this unproved claim.
  4. [Section 2.2, footnote 8 and Eqs. (2.13)-(2.19)] The completeness of the meson-baryon relations (2.13)-(2.19) is deferred to the companion paper [40]. This is load-bearing for the radical computations in Section 4, which use this presentation as the definition of the Higgs ring. The paper states that the gauge-integration and relation-based methods agree 'in all the explicit computations we could perform', which is a useful partial check, but the radical claims for Nc = Nf = 4 (Section 4.2) would be invalid if an additional independent relation existed. Please provide the proof or a more detailed verification, or state explicitly that the radical computations assume the completeness conjecture.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.4] The phrase 'so(8), whith' should read 'so(8), with'.
  2. [Section 4.1 / Reference [43]] The software is spelled 'Maclaulay2' in the text and 'Macaulay2' in the reference; please make the spelling consistent.
  3. [Figure 4 caption] The caption contains 'SCQD', which appears to be a typo for 'SQCD'.
  4. [Section 5.3.2, Eq. (5.51)] The convention that the sum from k = 1 to 0 vanishes is non-standard; please replace it with an explicit statement that the sum is empty when Nf = Nc.
  5. [References [40] and [42]] The companion papers [40] and [42] are cited without arXiv identifiers or publication data; please add the missing information or mark them as 'to appear'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the brane-web/magnetic-quiver Hilbert series are benchmarked against independent hyper-Kähler quotient and radical computations; Section 5 multiplicity formulas are explicitly conjectural fits, not derived predictions.

full rationale

The central agreement claimed in Section 6 is tested by comparing two independent constructions. On one side, the hyper-Kähler quotient computations of Section 2 produce Hilbert series directly from the F-term/gauge-invariant ring, with no input from brane webs; on the other side, the brane-web method of Section 3 independently reads magnetic quivers from decompositions of five-brane webs and evaluates their Coulomb-branch Hilbert series via the monopole formula. The two routes are not fitted to each other: for SU(3) with Nf=4, the brane-web expression (3.35) agrees with the Table 4 entry, while for SU(4) with Nf=4 the brane-web expression (3.21) initially disagrees with Table 4, and agreement is restored only after an independent computation of the radical ideal in Section 4.2 (equation (4.8)). This is a genuine comparison rather than a construction-by-construction identity. The general formulas in Section 5, especially (5.42)-(5.52), are reverse-engineered from the difference HSHK quotients minus HSBrane Web, but the paper explicitly labels them conjectures based on low-rank inspection and does not present them as the primary evidence for the central claim. Reliance on Conjecture 1 of [19], authored by overlapping authors, is a substantive correctness risk because the conjecture is imported rather than proved, and Section 5.3.2 admits that the simplest nontrivial check, SU(5) with Nf=6, is outside current computational reach. However, this is a conjecture-dependence and limitation, not circularity: the checked agreement uses an independent hyper-Kähler quotient construction, and the cited conjecture is a general parameter-free framework that is partially falsified or supported by the paper's own independent checks. The completeness of the meson-baryon relations, deferred to [40], is likewise independently checked in all explicit computations the authors could perform. No step in the derivation reduces by definition to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central comparison rests on two conjectures from the authors' own program: the magnetic quiver conjecture of [19] and the completeness of the relations in [40]. Neither is independently machine-checked. The Hilbert series computations from the hyper-Kahler quotient are direct algebraic computations, which provide the external benchmark for the low-rank checks. The multiplicity rules in Section 5 are fitted to examples.

free parameters (2)
  • multiplicity prefactor polynomials = t^{4i-2}+t^{4i} (Nf even); t^{4i}+t^{4i+2} (Nf odd)
    Introduced in Section 5.1 (eqs. 5.42-5.45) to match the nilpotent part HSHK - HSBraneWeb for Nf = 1,2,3,4, then extrapolated to arbitrary Nf.
  • intersection multiplicity rule = min(multiplicity of intersecting parts)
    Conjectured in Section 5.1 (paragraph following eq. 5.33) to evaluate the inclusion-exclusion formula for the full Higgs scheme; matches only small examples.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Magnetic quiver conjecture (Conjecture 1 of [19])
    Section 3 and Appendix A; the brane web predictions inherit this unproven conjecture.
  • domain assumption Completeness of the meson-baryon relations (2.13)-(2.19)
    Section 2.2; proof deferred to companion paper [40].
  • domain assumption Classical Higgs branch is independent of spacetime dimension for 8-supercharge theories
    Introduction; connects 4d N=2 to 5d N=1 brane web.
  • domain assumption Monopole formula for Coulomb branch Hilbert series of 3d N=4 quivers
    Section 3; standard result [23] used to compute all Hilbert series from magnetic quivers.
  • standard math Nullstellensatz and Lasker-Noether primary decomposition
    Appendix C and Sections 2.3, 4; standard commutative algebra.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Brane Webs and Magnetic Quivers for SQCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BASQO2N6

@misc{pith2026190900667,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Brane Webs and Magnetic Quivers for SQCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BASQO2N6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00667}
}
abstract

It is widely considered that the classical Higgs branch of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SQCD is a well understood object. However there is no satisfactory understanding of its structure. There are two complications: (1) the Higgs branch chiral ring contains nilpotent elements, as can easily be checked in the case of $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ with 1 flavour. (2) the Higgs branch as a geometric space can in general be decomposed into two cones with nontrivial intersection, the baryonic and mesonic branches. To study the second point in detail we use the recently developed tool of magnetic quivers for five-brane webs, using the fact that the classical Higgs branch for theories with 8 supercharges does not change through dimensional reduction. We compare this approach with the computation of the hyper-K\"ahler quotient using Hilbert series techniques, finding perfect agreement if nilpotent operators are eliminated by the computation of a so called radical. We study the nature of the nilpotent operators and give conjectures for the Hilbert series of the full Higgs branch, giving new insights into the vacuum structure of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SQCD. In addition we demonstrate the power of the magnetic quiver technique, as it allows us to identify the decomposition into cones, and provides us with the global symmetries of the theory, as a simple alternative to the techniques that were used to date.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Remarks on the Higgs Branch of 5d Conformal Matter

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The Higgs branches of 5d conformal matter atoms and molecules are computed via magnetic quivers and class-S circle reductions, with matching dimensions across the two methods.

  2. Classification of Minimal Abelian Coulomb Branches

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Abelian 3d N=4 quivers with isolated Coulomb branch singularities are exactly stable chains and well-defined cycles, with geometries given by U(1) or finite cyclic quotients.

  3. BPS Invariants for Generalized Toric Calabi-Yau Threefolds

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gopakumar–Vafa invariants are transported across Hanany–Witten transitions after removing a universal parallel-brane sector, giving first-time high-degree invariants for local dP4.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [19]

    Cabrera, A

    S. Cabrera, A. Hanany and F. Yagi, Tropical Geometry and Five Dimensional Higgs Branches at Infinite Coupling , JHEP 01 (2019) 068, [ 1810.01379]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [40]

    Bourget, S

    A. Bourget, S. Cabrera, J. Grimminger, A. Hanany, V. Lekeu and Z. Zhong, Gauge Invariant Generators and Relations of Higgs Branches for 4dN = 2 SQCD with simple Gauge Groups ,

    work page

  3. [1]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD, Nucl. Phys. B431 (1994) 484–550, [ hep-th/9408099]

    arXiv 1994

  4. [2]

    P. C. Argyres, M. R. Plesser and N. Seiberg, The Moduli space of vacua of N=2 SUSY QCD and duality in N=1 SUSY QCD , Nucl. Phys. B471 (1996) 159–194, [ hep-th/9603042]

    arXiv 1996

  5. [3]

    Argyres-Seiberg duality and the Higgs branch

    D. Gaiotto, A. Neitzke and Y. Tachikawa, Argyres-Seiberg duality and the Higgs branch , Commun. Math. Phys. 294 (2010) 389–410, [ 0810.4541]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  6. [4]

    The moduli space of vacua of N=2 class S theories

    D. Xie and K. Yonekura, The moduli space of vacua of N = 2 classS theories, JHEP 10 (2014) 134, [ 1404.7521]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  7. [5]

    N. J. Hitchin, A. Karlhede, U. Lindstrom and M. Rocek, Hyperkahler Metrics and Supersymmetry, Commun. Math. Phys. 108 (1987) 535

    1987

  8. [6]

    HyperK\"ahler quotients and N=4 gauge theories in D=2

    M. Billo and P. Fre, Hyperkahler quotients and N=4 gauge theories in D = 2 , hep-th/9411183

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 55 references
  1. [7]

    Antoniadis and B

    I. Antoniadis and B. Pioline, Higgs branch, hyperKahler quotient and duality in SUSY N=2 Yang-Mills theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12 (1997) 4907–4932, [ hep-th/9607058]

    1997 arXiv

  2. [8]

    R. P. Stanley, Hilbert functions of graded algebras , Advances in Mathematics 28 (1978) 57–83

    1978

  3. [9]

    Benvenuti, B

    S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, Counting BPS Operators in Gauge Theories: Quivers, Syzygies and Plethystics , JHEP 11 (2007) 050, [ hep-th/0608050]

    2007 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Benvenuti, A

    S. Benvenuti, A. Hanany and N. Mekareeya, The Hilbert Series of the One Instanton Moduli Space, JHEP 06 (2010) 100, [ 1005.3026]. – 56 –

    2010 arXiv

  5. [11]

    J. Gray, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He, V. Jejjala and N. Mekareeya, SQCD: A Geometric Aper¸ cu, JHEP 05 (2008) 099, [ 0803.4257]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Karch, D

    A. Karch, D. Lust and D. J. Smith, Equivalence of geometric engineering and Hanany-Witten via fractional branes , Nucl. Phys. B533 (1998) 348–372, [ hep-th/9803232]

    1998 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Karch, Field theory dynamics from branes in string theory

    A. Karch, Field theory dynamics from branes in string theory . PhD thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, 1998. hep-th/9812072

    1998 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Aharony and A

    O. Aharony and A. Hanany, Branes, superpotentials and superconformal fixed points, Nucl. Phys. B504 (1997) 239–271, [ hep-th/9704170]

    1997 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Aharony, A

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany and B. Kol, Webs of (p,q) five-branes, five-dimensional field theories and grid diagrams , JHEP 01 (1998) 002, [ hep-th/9710116]

    1998 arXiv

  10. [16]

    DeWolfe, A

    O. DeWolfe, A. Hanany, A. Iqbal and E. Katz, Five-branes, seven-branes and five-dimensional E(n) field theories , JHEP 03 (1999) 006, [ hep-th/9902179]

    1999 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Benini, S

    F. Benini, S. Benvenuti and Y. Tachikawa, Webs of five-branes and N=2 superconformal field theories, JHEP 09 (2009) 052, [ 0906.0359]

    2009 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Bergman, D

    O. Bergman, D. Rodr´ ıguez-G´ omez and G. Zafrir,5-Brane Webs, Symmetry Enhancement, and Duality in 5d Supersymmetric Gauge Theory , JHEP 03 (2014) 112, [ 1311.4199]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Witten, Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M theory , Nucl

    E. Witten, Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M theory , Nucl. Phys. B500 (1997) 3–42, [ hep-th/9703166]

    1997 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Beauville, Symplectic singularities, Inventiones mathematicae 139 (2000) 541–549

    A. Beauville, Symplectic singularities, Inventiones mathematicae 139 (2000) 541–549

    2000

  15. [22]

    Fu, A survey on symplectic singularities and symplectic resolutions , in Annales math´ ematiques Blaise Pascal, vol

    B. Fu, A survey on symplectic singularities and symplectic resolutions , in Annales math´ ematiques Blaise Pascal, vol. 13, pp. 209–236, 2006

    2006

  16. [23]

    Cremonesi, A

    S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3dN = 4 gauge theories, JHEP 01 (2014) 005, [ 1309.2657]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Del Zotto and A

    M. Del Zotto and A. Hanany, Complete Graphs, Hilbert Series, and the Higgs branch of the 4dN = 2 (An,A m) SCFTs, Nucl. Phys. B894 (2015) 439–455, [ 1403.6523]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Ferlito, A

    G. Ferlito, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya and G. Zafrir, 3d Coulomb branch and 5d Higgs branch at infinite coupling , JHEP 07 (2018) 061, [ 1712.06604]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Hanany and G

    A. Hanany and G. Zafrir, Discrete Gauging in Six Dimensions , JHEP 07 (2018) 168, [1804.08857]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Hanany and N

    A. Hanany and N. Mekareeya, The small E 8 instanton and the Kraft Procesi transition , JHEP 07 (2018) 098, [ 1801.01129]

    2018 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Cabrera, A

    S. Cabrera, A. Hanany and M. Sperling, Magnetic Quivers, Higgs Branches, and 6d N=(1,0) Theories, 1904.12293

    1904 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Hanany and E

    A. Hanany and E. Witten, Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics, Nucl. Phys. B492 (1997) 152–190, [ hep-th/9611230]

    1997 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Nakajima, Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories, I , Adv

    H. Nakajima, Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories, I , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 20 (2016) 595–669, [ 1503.03676]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Braverman, M

    A. Braverman, M. Finkelberg and H. Nakajima, Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensionalN = 4 gauge theories, II , 1601.03586. – 57 –

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Nakajima, Introduction to a provisional mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensionalN = 4 gauge theories, 1706.05154

    H. Nakajima, Introduction to a provisional mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensionalN = 4 gauge theories, 1706.05154

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (2009) 721–896, [ 0807.3720]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Ferlito and A

    G. Ferlito and A. Hanany, A tale of two cones: the Higgs Branch of Sp(n) theories with 2n flavours, 1609.06724

    arXiv

  28. [35]

    Hanany and R

    A. Hanany and R. Kalveks, Highest Weight Generating Functions for Hilbert Series , JHEP 10 (2014) 152, [ 1408.4690]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Hanany, S

    A. Hanany, S. Ramgoolam and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, Highest weight generating functions for hyperK¨ ahler T*(G/H) spaces, JHEP 10 (2016) 021, [ 1601.02531]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Cabrera and A

    S. Cabrera and A. Hanany, Branes and the Kraft-Procesi Transition, JHEP 11 (2016) 175, [1609.07798]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Bachas, J

    C. Bachas, J. Hoppe and B. Pioline, Nahm equations, N=1* domain walls, and D strings in AdS(5) x S(5) , JHEP 07 (2001) 041, [ hep-th/0007067]

    2001 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Hanany and R

    A. Hanany and R. Kalveks, Quiver Theories for Moduli Spaces of Classical Group Nilpotent Orbits, JHEP 06 (2016) 130, [ 1601.04020]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bourget, S

    A. Bourget, S. Cabrera, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, M. Sperling, A. Zajac and Z. Zhong, The Higgs mechanism — Hasse diagrams for symplectic singularities , JHEP 01 (2020) 157, [1908.04245]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Hanany and Z

    A. Hanany and Z. Zhong, Highest-Weight Generating Functions for Tropical Quivers ,

  35. [43]

    Macaulay 2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry

    D. Grayson and M. Stillman, “Macaulay 2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry.” http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/

  36. [44]

    Shimoyama and K

    T. Shimoyama and K. Yokoyama, Localization and primary decomposition of polynomial ideals, Journal of Symbolic Computation 22 (1996) 247–277

    1996

  37. [45]

    Eisenbud, C

    D. Eisenbud, C. Huneke and W. Vasconcelos, Direct methods for primary decomposition, Inventiones mathematicae 110 (1992) 207–235

    1992

  38. [46]

    Fulton and B

    W. Fulton and B. Sturmfels, Intersection theory on toric varieties , Topology 36 (1997) 335–353

    1997

  39. [47]

    Richter-Gebert, B

    J. Richter-Gebert, B. Sturmfels and T. Theobald, First steps in tropical geometry , Contemporary Mathematics 377 (2005) 289–318

    2005

  40. [48]

    Mikhalkin, Tropical geometry and its applications , arXiv preprint math/0601041 (2006)

    G. Mikhalkin, Tropical geometry and its applications , arXiv preprint math/0601041 (2006)

    2006 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Mikhailov, N

    A. Mikhailov, N. Nekrasov and S. Sethi, Geometric realizations of BPS states in N=2 theories, Nucl. Phys. B531 (1998) 345–362, [ hep-th/9803142]

    1998 arXiv

  42. [50]

    DeWolfe, T

    O. DeWolfe, T. Hauer, A. Iqbal and B. Zwiebach, Constraints on the BPS spectrum of N=2, D = 4 theories with A-D-E flavor symmetry , Nucl. Phys. B534 (1998) 261–274, [hep-th/9805220]

    1998 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Bergman and A

    O. Bergman and A. Fayyazuddin, String junction transitions in the moduli space of N=2 SYM, Nucl. Phys. B535 (1998) 139–151, [ hep-th/9806011]. – 58 –

    1998 arXiv

  44. [52]

    C. P. Bachas, M. B. Green and A. Schwimmer, (8,0) quantum mechanics and symmetry enhancement in type I’ superstrings , JHEP 01 (1998) 006, [ hep-th/9712086]

    1998 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra: with a view toward algebraic geometry , vol

    D. Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra: with a view toward algebraic geometry , vol. 150. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  46. [54]

    D. A. Cox, J. Little and D. O’shea, Using algebraic geometry, vol. 185. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006

    2006

  47. [55]

    Eisenbud and J

    D. Eisenbud and J. Harris, The geometry of schemes , vol. 197. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006. – 59 –

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.