Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 98 references

The paper argues that removing a universal parallel-brane sector from a generalized toric Calabi–Yau partition function reproduces the local del Pezzo invariants, giving the first high-degree Gopakumar–Vafa numbers for dP4.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 06:46 UTC pith:XVCV76TD

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful technique for transporting GV invariants across Hanany–Witten transitions and the first high-degree dP4 tables; the load-bearing white-dot vertex rule is explicitly conjectural, so the headline numbers are strong predictions, not fully established results. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.29451 v1 pith:XVCV76TD submitted 2026-07-31 hep-th

BPS Invariants for Generalized Toric Calabi-Yau Threefolds

Antoine Bourget , Peng Cheng , Quentin Lamouret This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords Gopakumar–Vafa invariantsgeneralized toric polygonstopological vertexHanany–Witten transitions5d SCFTsdel Pezzo surfacestopological stringsCalabi–Yau threefolds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that Gopakumar–Vafa (GV) invariants of local Calabi–Yau threefolds can be computed from brane webs with 7-branes — so-called generalized toric polygons (GTPs) — without relying on mirror symmetry or low-degree E-string techniques. The key assertion is that the difference between a GTP geometry and the ordinary del Pezzo surface engineering the same 5d SCFT is a single universal factor coming from parallel external 5-branes; once divided out, the two topological string partition functions coincide. That identification lets invariants be transported between geometrically distinct Calabi–Yau threefolds that engineer the same theory. Using it, the authors obtain high-degree GV invariants for local dP4 for the first time, after checking low-degree results against E-string data. A sympathetic reader would care because it offers a new, curve-class–refined route to BPS numbers that were previously out of reach.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is the identity (4.1): for the rank-1 En SCFTs with 2 ≤ n ≤ 8, Ztop(KGdPn)/Z∥(KGdPn) = ZEn SCFT = Ztop(KdPn). In words: after removing the parallel-brane decoupled sector Z∥ from the topological string partition function of a generalized del Pezzo GTP geometry, one obtains exactly the partition function of the local ordinary del Pezzo surface. The same principle is formulated more generally in (1.6) whenever two Calabi–Yau threefolds engineer the same SCFT. The authors verify the Hanany–Witten transformations that mix curve classes and Mori cones, and use the resulting transport to tabulate GV invariants for local dP4 — including high-degree, h

What carries the argument

The central object is the white-dot generalized topological vertex rule (last row of Table 1): a single additional rule extending the topological vertex to webs where several 5-branes end on the same 7-brane, as encoded in a generalized toric polygon. Its companion is the decoupled-sector formula Zdecoupled = Z∥, the product (plethystic exponential) of inverse-conifold factors associated with the positive roots of A_{N−1} for each stack of N parallel external branes. Hanany–Witten moves then act as isomorphisms on the SCFT sector, identifying Kähler parameters and mapping Mori cones (e.g., the class (df, db) of F0 maps to (df+db, db) of F2). These pieces together give, order by order in the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the white-dot rule — the extended topological vertex prescription for generalized toric diagrams — correctly computes the topological string partition function of the GTP geometries; the paper states this assumption explicitly and notes it is conjectural, so if the rule is wrong, every GTP-side partition function and therefore every transported del Pezzo invariant would be off.

What would settle it

Compute the GV invariants of the GTP geometry X_wd_3 (the white-dot geometry associated with F3) by an independent method — for instance, from the one-parameter family of threefolds whose generic fiber is that GTP, using the algebro-geometric construction the paper cites — and compare with the partition function obtained from the white-dot rule; a discrepancy would invalidate the transport identity. Alternatively, derive the local dP4 invariants of Table 6 through holomorphic anomaly or E-string blowup equations to degree beyond the current checks and look for the first disagreement.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If (4.1) is correct, the GV invariants of local dP4 are exactly those extracted from the GTP web and listed in Table 6 after summing over curve classes of fixed anticanonical degree; these high-degree numbers are new.
  • The Hanany–Witten transition maps curve classes and Kähler parameters explicitly, so the partition-function equality implies a concrete dictionary of GV invariants between pairs such as KF0↔KF2 and KF1↔X_wd_3, as in (3.15) and (3.19).
  • The decoupled sector of any GTP geometry is entirely captured by stacks of parallel external branes, contributing an inverse-conifold factor per positive root of A_{N−1}; Fano surfaces such as dPn carry no such sector, so Ztop(KdPn) equals the 5d SCFT partition function directly.
  • The conjecture that the intersection of all flop Mori cones supports all generic GV invariants (with only finitely many exceptions) is sharpened by the F1–F3 analysis, and the white-dot geometry is shown to cancel the naive (1,−3)-curve class contribution.
  • The paper identifies the correct dP7 invariant at degree 4, genus 1 as 12045, correcting an earlier entry that used a different multi-cover counting, thereby demonstrating the physical counting rules matter at the level of individual invariants.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the white-dot rule is proven from the algebro-geometric construction of GTP threefolds, the transport identity (4.1) would become a theorem, and the same strategy should extend to higher-rank SCFTs with GTP realizations, whose decoupled sectors may involve more general parallel-brane partitions.
  • The paper's picture — that the distinction between geometric and SCFT-relevant curve classes is captured by anticanonical-degree-zero curves with (−1,−1) normal bundle appearing over isolated base points — may generalize beyond the toric setting to other non-Fano local surfaces, giving a broader principle for identifying decoupled sectors.
  • The observed genus-one pattern GV_{g=1,9−n}(dPn) = (−1)^n(n−10) and the unexplained F0/F1 identity (5.1) look like they could be derived from the Mori-cone/flop framework developed here; doing so would be a natural next step.
  • Because the parallel-brane factor is a pure inverse-conifold product, the equality (4.1) could be tested at the refined level (two-parameter Omega background) using the refined topological vertex, yielding refined GV invariants for dP4 as a built-in extension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a topological vertex formalism for generalized toric polygons (GTPs), i.e. brane webs in which several 5-branes end on the same 7-brane, by adding a single 'white-dot' vertex rule (Table 1, last row) to the standard toric vertex. The central claim is Eq. (4.1): for 2≤n≤8, after removing the parallel-brane decoupled sector Z_∥, the topological string partition function of a GTP geometry engineering the rank-1 E_n SCFT equals exactly the partition function of the local del Pezzo surface K dP_n. This 'transport' identity is used to compute GV invariants for local dP_n, notably new high-degree dP_4 invariants (Table 6). The paper also analyzes Hanany–Witten moves and flops for the F_0/F_2 and F_1/F_3 pairs, relates GV classes across these transitions, and provides independent checks: the F_0–F_2 identity reduces to a known blowup relation, low-degree results match E-string data, and dP_8 genus-zero anticanonical sums are reproduced by a Picard–Fuchs calculation.

Significance. If correct, the transport method is a genuinely efficient way to obtain GV invariants for non-toric del Pezzo geometries, and the first-time dP_4 tables would be a substantial new dataset. The paper has several concrete strengths: the Hanany–Witten identities (2.14), (2.16), (2.21) are verified order by order; (2.14) is reduced to the known identity [76, Eq. (4.32)]; low-degree dP_4–dP_7 results match E-string and existing local-mirror-symmetry data, with one explicitly explained discrepancy at Table 9; and the dP_8 anticanonical sums are computed by an independent Picard–Fuchs route (Table 4). The central weakness is that the GTP-side input, the white-dot topological vertex rule, is explicitly conjectural (§3.2, footnote 6), and the equality Z_top(K dP_n)=Z_{E_n} is partly based on physical identification rather than a derivation, as the authors acknowledge in §4.1. These issues do not make the work circular, but they mean the headline dP_4 invariants inherit an unproven computational input.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Table 1 (last row), footnote 6] The entire GTP-side computation rests on the white-dot generalized topological vertex rule, which the paper explicitly labels as conjectural: §3.2 states 'The discussion below assumes that the generalized toric diagram admits the local topological vertex description with white dots reviewed above', and footnote 6 adds 'Strictly speaking, this last statement is conjectural.' Since Eq. (4.1) uses Z_top(K GdP_n) computed with this rule, every extracted invariant in Table 6—including the new high-degree dP_4 entries—inherits this assumption. The low-degree E-string checks are encouraging but do not constrain the high-degree coefficients that are the paper's main novelty. I would want an independent check of the white-dot rule in at least one new regime (e.g., higher-degree or higher-genus invariants against a non-vertex method, or further combinatorial identities reducing (2.18)/(3.21) to kn
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (4.1)] The second equality in (4.1), Z_{E_n SCFT}=Z_top(K dP_n), is asserted from the physical identification with the same SCFT and the Fano property of dP_n. The paper itself states in §4.1: 'Fano-ness alone does not derive the full equality of partition functions; it only rules out the particular decoupled sector supported on anticanonical-degree-zero curves.' This leaves a gap in the core transport claim. The dP_8 sum checks and the low-degree dP_4–dP_7 matches provide evidence, but a derivation or a systematic test of the equality for all n (e.g., using anticanonical-degree sums from the mass-dependent mirror calculation) would be needed before the first-time dP_4 invariants can be regarded as established rather than as a strong conjecture.
  3. [§4.2.4, Table 6] The paper explains that for dP_4 'the matching of curve classes is not obvious' and therefore presents only invariants summed over anticanonical degree. However, the abstract and introduction describe these as 'GV invariants ... at high degree for the first time'. This is not incorrect if 'degree' means anticanonical degree, but it should be stated prominently that Table 6 gives genus-resolved anticanonical-degree sums, not individual curve-class invariants for dP_4. Otherwise the reader may overestimate the strength of the claim. This is a clarity issue, but it directly affects how the headline result is interpreted.
  4. [§3.2, Eq. (3.21)] The cancellation that eliminates the (0,1) class in X_wd_3 relies on the identity Σ_μ s_μ(q^{-ρ})s_{μ^T}(q^{-ρ})(-Q_b)^{|μ|}q^{κ_μ}/R_{μ^T 0}(Q_b)=1. This identity is central to showing that the white-dot rule removes the naive (1,-3)-curve contribution, but I do not see a proof or a reference for it beyond the statement that it follows from the vertex rules. Since the white-dot rule itself is the conjectural input, this identity should either be proved (perhaps by a Cauchy-type manipulation) or verified to high order and explicitly flagged as part of the conjecture.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a stray formatting artifact: 'includingdP 4' should read 'including dP_4'. Please check the final PDF for similar spacing issues.
  2. [§1, footnote 1] The notation q is used both for the topological string variable e^{ig_s} and as the instanton counting parameter; the paper says the former q 'should not be confused' with the latter, but in several places (e.g., (2.3), (4.24)) the same symbol appears in different roles. Please disambiguate notation consistently, or at least add a table of symbols.
  3. [Table 3 (top) and Table 13] The F_3/F_2 tables are dense and the blue entries are explained in the caption, but the orientation of the d_f/d_b axes is not uniform across tables. Adding axis labels directly on each table, or a common orientation convention, would help readability.
  4. [§4.2.7, Table 9] The one-parameter matches in Section 4.2 are said to use a limit Q_2→1, but the precise relation between the parameters of the brane webs and the del Pezzo anticanonical coordinate is not given for Tables 8 and 9. A short explicit substitution, as done for (4.45), would make the comparison reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: explicit conjectural white-dot/GTP input and one minor non-load-bearing self-citation; the central transport identity has independent anchors.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, Eq. (4.1) is not obtained by fitting. The GTP-side Ztop is computed from the topological vertex with the white-dot rule inherited from the external reference [67] (Table 1, last row), and Z∥ is fixed by the brane-web strip formulas (2.7)-(2.9), not by demanding that (4.1) hold. The second equality in (4.1) is a physical identification between two geometries engineering the same rank-1 SCFT, and it is checked at low degree against E-string elliptic genera and, for dP8, against the independent Picard-Fuchs computation of genus-zero anticanonical sums (Table 4, Eq. (4.12)); Eq. (2.17) is reduced to the known identity [76]. The only formally definitional relation is (1.1), but the paper immediately supplies an independent geometric expression Zdecoupled = Z∥ and tests it against local mirror symmetry and a CPT argument. The manuscript itself flags the genuine soft spots: footnote 6 ('Strictly speaking, this last statement is conjectural') and §3.2 ('The discussion below assumes that the generalized toric diagram admits the local topological vertex description with white dots reviewed above'). These are unproven computational inputs, not circular reductions. There is one self-citation, the unpublished 'To Appear' paper [66] used in §3.3 for the alpha-family interpretation of white-dot GTP diagrams; it is peripheral to the main dP4 computation (which uses toric GdP4) and is paired with the external reference [65], so it is not load-bearing. Overall, no prediction is equivalent to its input by construction; the score reflects the minor self-citation and explicitly conjectural inputs rather than a circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data: all Kähler parameters are geometric inputs, the E8 mass parameters of §4.1 are specialization variables, and the Q2→1 limits are limiting procedures rather than fits. The axioms are dominated by one genuinely fragile premise — the conjectural white-dot vertex rule — plus the physical identifications (Z∥ as the decoupled sector; Fano ⇒ no decoupled sector) that are argued but not derived. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated: the white dot is inherited from [52,67] and Z∥ is an identified contribution of existing states, not an invented entity.

axioms (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The white-dot generalized topological vertex rule of [67] computes Ztop for the GTP geometries considered
    Inherited from Hayashi–Zoccarato and adopted via Table 1, last row, without derivation. The paper flags it: §3.2 'The discussion below assumes that the generalized toric diagram admits the local topological vertex description with white dots reviewed above'; footnote 6: 'Strictly speaking, this last statement is conjectural.'
  • domain assumption Zdecoupled[X[P]] = Z∥[P]: the decoupled sector is entirely accounted for by external parallel branes (Eqs. 1.5, 2.6)
    Supported by the CPT argument in §1, the Q2→0 isolation checks of §2.4.4, local mirror-symmetry checks (§4.1), and the GW computation of Appendix C. This is argued, not formally proven for all GTPs, and it is the physical bridge of the whole method.
  • domain assumption Zdecoupled[KdPn] = 1 for Fano del Pezzo surfaces dPn
    Used in (4.1) to equate Ztop(KdPn) with the 5d SCFT partition function. Self-flagged in §4.1: 'Fano-ness alone does not derive the full equality of partition functions; it only rules out the particular decoupled sector supported on anticanonical-degree-zero curves.'
  • domain assumption GTP diagrams with white dots are interpreted as one-parameter families of threefolds whose α→0 fiber is the corresponding toric diagram (after [65,66])
    Section 3.3 uses this to distinguish K_F3 from X_wd^3 and to justify that the white-dot geometry is the SCFT-relevant one. Reference [66] is an unpublished 'To Appear' paper by two of the present authors; the interpretation is not independently documented elsewhere.
  • standard math Standard topological vertex / GW–DT–GV correspondence (Appendix A, (A.7)-(A.10))
    Background machinery from [20,21,3] used throughout, including the plethystic-exponential form of the GV expansion; not re-derived in this paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 43980 in / 16393 out tokens · 168456 ms · 2026-08-03T06:46:41.441813+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We apply topological vertex techniques to Calabi-Yau threefolds dual to brane webs where several 5-branes can end on the same 7-brane. In this context, we determine how topological string partition functions transform under Hanany-Witten transitions and flops, which allows us to track curves and the associated invariants under such transitions. The contributions of parallel external branes form a universal sector invisible to the 5d SCFT; once it is removed, invariants can be transported between different geometries engineering the same theory. This yields an efficient technique to compute Gopakumar-Vafa invariants at any degree and genus. We illustrate this with local Hirzebruch and del Pezzo surfaces, including $dP_4$, whose invariants we obtain at high degree for the first time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 88 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gopakumar and C

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa,M theory and topological strings. 1.,hep-th/9809187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Gopakumar and C

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa,M theory and topological strings. 2.,hep-th/9812127

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Maulik, N

    D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande,Gromov-witten theory and donaldson-thomas theory, i,math/0312059

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Iqbal and A.-K

    A. Iqbal and A.-K. Kashani-Poor,Instanton counting and Chern-Simons theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7(2003) 457–497, [hep-th/0212279]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Eguchi and H

    T. Eguchi and H. Kanno,Topological strings and Nekrasov’s formulas,JHEP12(2003) 006, [hep-th/0310235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Taki,Refined Topological Vertex and Instanton Counting,JHEP03(2008) 048, [0710.1776]

    M. Taki,Refined Topological Vertex and Instanton Counting,JHEP03(2008) 048, [0710.1776]. – 51 – n ToricdP n ToricGdP n GTPGdP n 0 1 , ,. . . 2 , ,. . . 3 , , , ,. . . 4 , , , ,. . . 5 , , , ,. . . 6 , , ,. . . 7 , , ,. . . 8 , ,. . . T able 11: (G)TPs for local del Pezzo and generalized del Pezzo surfaces. – 52 – df \db 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 -2 1 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    S. H. Katz, A. Klemm and C. Vafa,Geometric engineering of quantum field theories,Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 173–195, [hep-th/9609239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    N. C. Leung and C. Vafa,Branes and toric geometry,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 91–118, [hep-th/9711013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov,Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions,Prog. Math. 244(2006) 525–596, [hep-th/0306238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  10. [10]

    Nekrasov and S

    N. Nekrasov and S. Shadchin,ABCD of instantons,Commun. Math. Phys.252(2004) 359–391, [hep-th/0404225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  11. [11]

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili,Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories, in16th International Congress on Mathematical Physics, pp. 265–289, 8, 2009.0908.4052. DOI

    arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    Nekrasov,BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinger equations and qq-characters,JHEP03(2016) 181, [1512.05388]

    N. Nekrasov,BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinger equations and qq-characters,JHEP03(2016) 181, [1512.05388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Nekrasov,BPS/CFT CORRESPONDENCE II: INSTANTONS AT CROSSROADS, MODULI AND COMPACTNESS THEOREM,Adv

    N. Nekrasov,BPS/CFT CORRESPONDENCE II: INSTANTONS AT CROSSROADS, MODULI AND COMPACTNESS THEOREM,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 503–583, [1608.07272]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Nekrasov,BPS/CFT correspondence V: BPZ and KZ equations from qq-characters, 1711.11582

    N. Nekrasov,BPS/CFT correspondence V: BPZ and KZ equations from qq-characters, 1711.11582

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Nekrasov,BPS/CFT Correspondence III: Gauge Origami partition function and qq-characters,Commun

    N. Nekrasov,BPS/CFT Correspondence III: Gauge Origami partition function and qq-characters,Commun. Math. Phys.358(2018) 863–894, [1701.00189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Braverman,Instanton counting via affine Lie algebras

    A. Braverman,Instanton counting via affine Lie algebras. 1. Equivariant J functions of (affine) flag manifolds and Whittaker vectors, inCRM Workshop on Algebraic Structures and Moduli Spaces, 1, 2004.math/0401409

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  17. [17]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka,Lectures on instanton counting,math/0311058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Magureanu,Partition functions and fibering operators on the Coulomb branch of 5d SCFTs,JHEP01(2023) 035, [2209.13564]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    N. A. Nekrasov,Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7(2003) 831–864, [hep-th/0206161]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  20. [20]

    Aganagic, M

    M. Aganagic, M. Marino and C. Vafa,All loop topological string amplitudes from Chern-Simons theory,Commun. Math. Phys.247(2004) 467–512, [hep-th/0206164]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Aganagic, A

    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Marino and C. Vafa,The Topological vertex,Commun. Math. Phys.254(2005) 425–478, [hep-th/0305132]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  22. [22]

    Gopakumar and C

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa,On the gauge theory / geometry correspondence,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 1415–1443, [hep-th/9811131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  23. [23]

    Aharony, A

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany and B. Kol,Webs of (p,q) five-branes, five-dimensional field theories and grid diagrams,JHEP01(1998) 002, [hep-th/9710116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  24. [24]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes,Commun. Math. Phys.165(1994) 311–428, [hep-th/9309140]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  25. [25]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,Holomorphic anomalies in topological field theories,Nucl. Phys. B405(1993) 279–304, [hep-th/9302103]. – 55 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  26. [26]

    Witten,Mirror manifolds and topological field theory,AMS/IP Stud

    E. Witten,Mirror manifolds and topological field theory,AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.9(1998) 121–160, [hep-th/9112056]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  27. [27]

    Candelas, X

    P. Candelas, X. C. De La Ossa, P. S. Green and L. Parkes,A Pair of Calabi-Yau manifolds as an exactly soluble superconformal theory,Nucl. Phys. B359(1991) 21–74

    1991

  28. [28]

    T. M. Chiang, A. Klemm, S. T. Yau and E. Zaslow,Local mirror symmetry: Calculations and interpretations,hep-th/9903053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Witten,Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions,Nucl

    E. Witten,Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B403(1993) 159–222, [hep-th/9301042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  30. [30]

    D. R. Morrison,Gromov–Witten invariants and localization,J. Phys. A50(2017) 443004, [1608.02956]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Jockers, V

    H. Jockers, V. Kumar, J. M. Lapan, D. R. Morrison and M. Romo,Two-Sphere Partition Functions and Gromov-Witten Invariants,Commun. Math. Phys.325(2014) 1139–1170, [1208.6244]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    Closset, S

    C. Closset, S. Cremonesi and D. S. Park,The equivariant A-twist and gauged linear sigma models on the two-sphere,JHEP06(2015) 076, [1504.06308]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    Benini and B

    F. Benini and B. Le Floch,Supersymmetric localization in two dimensions,J. Phys. A50 (2017) 443003, [1608.02955]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Haghighat, G

    B. Haghighat, G. Lockhart and C. Vafa,Fusing E-strings to heterotic strings: E+E→H, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 126012, [1406.0850]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  35. [35]

    Haghighat, A

    B. Haghighat, A. Klemm, G. Lockhart and C. Vafa,Strings of Minimal 6d SCFTs,Fortsch. Phys.63(2015) 294–322, [1412.3152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    J. Gu, B. Haghighat, K. Sun and X. Wang,Blowup Equations for 6d SCFTs. I,JHEP03 (2019) 002, [1811.02577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    J. Gu, A. Klemm, K. Sun and X. Wang,Elliptic blowup equations for 6d SCFTs. Part II. Exceptional cases,JHEP12(2019) 039, [1905.00864]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    J. Gu, B. Haghighat, A. Klemm, K. Sun and X. Wang,Elliptic blowup equations for 6d SCFTs. Part III. E-strings, M-strings and chains,JHEP07(2020) 135, [1911.11724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    J. Gu, B. Haghighat, A. Klemm, K. Sun and X. Wang,Elliptic blowup equations for 6d SCFTs. Part IV. Matters,JHEP11(2021) 090, [2006.03030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Del Zotto, J

    M. Del Zotto, J. Gu, M.-X. Huang, A.-K. Kashani-Poor, A. Klemm and G. Lockhart, Topological Strings on Singular Elliptic Calabi-Yau 3-folds and Minimal 6d SCFTs,JHEP 03(2018) 156, [1712.07017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Del Zotto and G

    M. Del Zotto and G. Lockhart,Universal Features of BPS Strings in Six-dimensional SCFTs,JHEP08(2018) 173, [1804.09694]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Del Zotto and I

    M. Del Zotto and I. n. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria,Global Structures from the Infrared,2204.06495

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Del Zotto and G

    M. Del Zotto and G. Lockhart,The ALE partition functions of M-strings,JHEP04(2024) 018, [2309.00607]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Del Zotto and G

    M. Del Zotto and G. Lockhart,The ALE Partition Functions of M-String Orbifolds, 2311.08462

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Huang and A

    M.-x. Huang and A. Klemm,Direct integration for generalΩbackgrounds,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.16(2012) 805–849, [1009.1126]. – 56 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Huang, A

    M.-X. Huang, A. Klemm and M. Poretschkin,Refined stable pair invariants for E-, M- and [p, q]-strings,JHEP11(2013) 112, [1308.0619]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    Huang, S

    M.-x. Huang, S. Katz and A. Klemm,Topological String on elliptic CY 3-folds and the ring of Jacobi forms,JHEP10(2015) 125, [1501.04891]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    J. A. Minahan, D. Nemeschansky and N. P. Warner,Investigating the BPS spectrum of noncritical E(n) strings,Nucl. Phys. B508(1997) 64–106, [hep-th/9705237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  49. [49]

    J. A. Minahan, D. Nemeschansky and N. P. Warner,Partition functions for BPS states of the noncritical E(8) string,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.1(1998) 167–183, [hep-th/9707149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  50. [50]

    J. A. Minahan, D. Nemeschansky, C. Vafa and N. P. Warner,E strings and N=4 topological Yang-Mills theories,Nucl. Phys. B527(1998) 581–623, [hep-th/9802168]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  51. [51]

    Bourget, J

    A. Bourget, J. F. Grimminger, M. Martone and G. Zafrir,Magnetic quivers for rank 2 theories,JHEP03(2022) 208, [2110.11365]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Benini, S

    F. Benini, S. Benvenuti and Y. Tachikawa,Webs of five-branes and N=2 superconformal field theories,JHEP09(2009) 052, [0906.0359]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  53. [53]

    Cabrera, A

    S. Cabrera, A. Hanany and F. Yagi,Tropical Geometry and Five Dimensional Higgs Branches at Infinite Coupling,JHEP01(2019) 068, [1810.01379]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Bourget, S

    A. Bourget, S. Cabrera, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany and Z. Zhong,Brane Webs and Magnetic Quivers for SQCD,JHEP03(2020) 176, [1909.00667]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Bourget, S

    A. Bourget, S. Giacomelli, J. F. Grimminger, A. Hanany, M. Sperling and Z. Zhong,S-fold magnetic quivers,JHEP02(2021) 054, [2010.05889]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    van Beest, A

    M. van Beest, A. Bourget, J. Eckhard and S. Schafer-Nameki,(Symplectic) Leaves and (5d Higgs) Branches in the Poly(go)nesian Tropical Rain Forest,JHEP11(2020) 124, [2008.05577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Van Beest, A

    M. Van Beest, A. Bourget, J. Eckhard and S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki,(5d RG-flow) Trees in the Tropical Rain Forest,JHEP03(2021) 241, [2011.07033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Bourget, A

    A. Bourget, A. Collinucci and S. Schafer-Nameki,Generalized toric polygons, T-branes, and 5d SCFTs,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 079, [2301.05239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Arias-Tamargo, S

    G. Arias-Tamargo, S. Franco and D. Rodr ´ ıguez-G´ omez,The geometry of GTPs and 5d SCFTs,JHEP07(2024) 159, [2403.09776]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Franco and R.-K

    S. Franco and R.-K. Seong,Twin theories, polytope mutations and quivers for GTPs,JHEP 07(2023) 034, [2302.10951]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Franco and D

    S. Franco and D. Rodriguez-Gomez,Quiver tails and brane webs,JHEP10(2024) 118, [2310.10724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Carre˜ no Bolla, S

    I. Carre˜ no Bolla, S. Franco and D. Rodr ´ ıguez-G´ omez,The 5d tangram: brane webs, 7-branes and primitive T-cones,JHEP05(2025) 175, [2411.01510]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Carre˜ no Bolla, S

    I. Carre˜ no Bolla, S. Franco and D. Rodr ´ ıguez-G´ omez,A Hilbert series for generalized toric polygons,JHEP05(2026) 023, [2509.08876]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    M. Kho, K. Lee, N. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Integrable Systems for Generalized Toric Polygons and Higgsed 5d N=1 Theories,2603.19353

    arXiv

  65. [65]

    Alexeev, H

    V. Alexeev, H. Arg¨ uz and P. Bousseau,Non-toric Brane Webs, Calabi–Yau 3-Folds, and 5d SCFTs,Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025) 287, [2410.04714]. – 57 –

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Bourget, I

    A. Bourget, I. Carre˜ no Bolla and Q. Lamouret,GTPs from Scattering diagrams and Broken Lines,To Appear(2026)

    2026

  67. [67]

    Hayashi and G

    H. Hayashi and G. Zoccarato,Topological vertex for Higgsed 5d T N theories,JHEP09 (2015) 023, [1505.00260]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Bergman, D

    O. Bergman, D. Rodr ´ ıguez-G´ omez and G. Zafrir,5-Brane Webs, Symmetry Enhancement, and Duality in 5d Supersymmetric Gauge Theory,JHEP03(2014) 112, [1311.4199]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  69. [69]

    L. Bao, V. Mitev, E. Pomoni, M. Taki and F. Yagi,Non-Lagrangian Theories from Brane Junctions,JHEP01(2014) 175, [1310.3841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Taki,Seiberg Duality, 5d SCFTs and Nekrasov Partition Functions,1401.7200

    M. Taki,Seiberg Duality, 5d SCFTs and Nekrasov Partition Functions,1401.7200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Seiberg,Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics,Phys

    N. Seiberg,Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics,Phys. Lett. B388(1996) 753–760, [hep-th/9608111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  72. [72]

    D. R. Morrison and N. Seiberg,Extremal transitions and five-dimensional supersymmetric field theories,Nucl. Phys. B483(1997) 229–247, [hep-th/9609070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  73. [73]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Magureanu,TheU-plane of rank-one 4dN= 2KK theories,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 065, [2107.03509]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Iqbal and A.-K

    A. Iqbal and A.-K. Kashani-Poor,The Vertex on a strip,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.10(2006) 317–343, [hep-th/0410174]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  75. [75]

    Karp, C.-C

    D. Karp, C.-C. M. Liu and M. Mari˜ no,The local gromov–witten invariants of configurations of rational curves,Geometry and Topology10(Mar., 2006) 115–168, [math/0506488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  76. [76]

    Bershtein and A

    M. Bershtein and A. Shchechkin,Painlev´ e equations from Nakajima–Yoshioka blowup relations,Lett. Math. Phys.109(2019) 2359–2402, [1811.04050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka,Instanton counting on blowup. II. K-theoretic partition function,math/0505553

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    P. S. Aspinwall, B. R. Greene and D. R. Morrison,Calabi-Yau moduli space, mirror manifolds and space-time topology change in string theory,Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 414–480, [hep-th/9309097]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  79. [79]

    Konishi and S

    Y. Konishi and S. Minabe,Flop invariance of the topological vertex,Int. J. Math.19(2008) 27–45, [math/0601352]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  80. [80]

    Pandharipande and R

    R. Pandharipande and R. P. Thomas,13/2 ways of counting curves,Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser.411(2014) 282–333, [1111.1552]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.