Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Insights into Hydration Dynamics and Cooperative Interactions in Glycerol-Water Mixtures by Terahertz Dielectric Spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read At 7.5 mol % glycerol, water's hydration shells start to overlap

desk verdict New broadband dielectric data and a plausible four-process picture, but the hydration number printed in Eq. (5) does not reproduce from the paper's own table. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00872 v1 pith:IXCT2KMS submitted 2019-09-02 physics.chem-ph physics.bio-ph

classification physics.chem-phphysics.bio-ph
keywords glycerol-watermixturesterahertzdielectricspectroscopyDebyerelaxationhydrationshellconfinedwatercriticalconcentrationmoleculardynamicshydrogenbonding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that glycerol-water mixtures at 25 °C relax through four distinct molecular processes, and that a critical glycerol concentration near 7.5 mol % marks the onset of hydration-shell overlap. The four Debye components are assigned to glycerol rotation ($\tau_1 \approx 910$ ps), water confined inside a glycerol network ($\tau_2 \approx 85$ ps), hydration-layer water ($\tau_3 \approx 35$ ps), and bulk water ($\tau_4 \approx 8.27$ ps). In dilute mixtures the authors extract a hydration number of about 5.58 water molecules per glycerol, matching molecular dynamics simulations. If the picture holds, it provides a quantitative molecular description of how glycerol alters water dynamics, with direct relevance to its use as a cryoprotectant and protein stabilizer.

What carries the argument

The central object is the four-term Debye relaxation model (Eq. 2), which decomposes the measured complex dielectric function into four additive relaxation processes, each with its own relaxation time and dielectric strength. The decomposition is the entire engine of the analysis: the dielectric strengths of the slow water components are compared with the deficit in the bulk-water strength to obtain the hydration number, and the concentration at which the bound-water strength saturates while the confined-water strength begins to grow identifies the critical overlap concentration. Molecular dynamics autocorrelation functions serve as a consistency check on the ordering and assignment of the relaxation processes, not as the source of the decomposition.

What would settle it

If a precise dielectric measurement on a glycerol-water sample below 7.5 mol % glycerol showed a nonzero relaxation component near 1.8 GHz (approximately 85 ps), the claim that confined water only emerges above the critical concentration would be contradicted. Alternatively, an independent structural measurement, such as neutron scattering with isotopic substitution or NMR, that did not find roughly 5.6 slow water molecules per glycerol at low concentration would undercut the hydration number.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the complex dielectric spectrum of glycerol-water mixtures from 50 MHz to 0.5 THz is described by a sum of four Debye relaxation processes whose time constants are essentially independent of concentration: $\tau_1 \approx 910$ ps (glycerol rotation), $\tau_2 \approx 85$ ps (water confined in a glycerol network), $\tau_3 \approx 35$ ps (water in the hydration layer of glycerol), and $\tau_4 \approx 8.27$ ps (bulk water). The dielectric strengths of these components reveal a threshold at about 7.5 mol % glycerol: below it, each glycerol molecule carries an isolated hydration shell containing on average 5.58 water molecules; above it, hydration shells overlap, the bound-water dielectric strength saturates, and confined water emerges with a dielectric strength that grows linearly with glycerol content. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations reproduce the hydration number and the ordering of the relaxation times, with the simulated absolute times systematically shorter than the measured ones, a discrepancy the authors attribute to the water model.

Load-bearing premise

The whole picture depends on the assumption that the four Debye components correspond one-to-one to four physically distinct molecular populations, and that this four-component decomposition is unique.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Below 7.5 mol % glycerol, the mixture can be described as bulk water plus isolated hydration shells of about 5.6 water molecules around each glycerol molecule.
  • Above 7.5 mol %, hydration shells overlap and a distinct confined-water population appears; its amount grows linearly with glycerol content.
  • Because the relaxation times are nearly constant across concentration, the local hydrogen-bond environment of each species remains the same, even as the mixture becomes glycerol-rich.
  • The systematic difference between simulated and measured relaxation times is attributed to the water model, so simulations are used for ordering and structure rather than absolute rates.
  • The critical concentration gives a concrete boundary for when glycerol-water solutions change their molecular-scale behavior as a solvent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because glycerol has three OH groups (up to six hydrogen bonds), a testable extension is that other polyols should show the same four-population decomposition with a critical concentration that scales with the number of hydroxyl groups per molecule.
  • The bound-water relaxation time near 35 ps is slower than the hydration-water times usually reported for proteins, suggesting that glycerol may stabilize biomolecules by slowing interfacial water more strongly than typical protein surfaces do; this comparison is not made in the paper.
  • Isotopic substitution experiments (H2O vs D2O, or selectively deuterated glycerol) could tag the hydration-layer and confined-water components and check the four-Debye assignment without relying on the uniqueness of the fit.
  • Repeating the measurement as a function of temperature could show whether the 7.5 mol % threshold shifts, and whether it tracks the temperature dependence of glycerol's cryoprotective action.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports megahertz-to-terahertz dielectric spectroscopy of glycerol-water mixtures at 25 °C, fitting the complex permittivity from 50 MHz to 0.5 THz to a sum of four Debye relaxation processes. The four time constants, τ1 ≈ 910 ps, τ2 ≈ 85 ps, τ3 ≈ 35 ps, and τ4 ≈ 8.27 ps, are assigned respectively to glycerol rotation, water confined in a glycerol network, water in the hydration layer of glycerol, and bulk water. From the dielectric strength Δε3 the authors extract a hydration number N_hyd ≈ 5.58 at low glycerol concentration, compare it with a molecular dynamics primary-shell value of 5.57, and identify a critical glycerol concentration of about 7.5 mol % where hydration shells begin to overlap and confined water emerges. The MD simulations are used to support the assignment of the slower water relaxation times and the concentration dependence of the hydration structure.

Significance. If established, the four-process decomposition and the ~7.5 mol % hydration-shell-overlap crossover would provide a quantitative picture of glycerol hydration dynamics that is relevant to cryoprotection and cosolvent behavior. The paper has clear strengths: the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function are fit simultaneously over an unusually wide frequency range, and the MD simulations provide an independent structural estimate of the primary hydration-shell population. The proposed distinction between hydration-layer water and water confined in a glycerol network is a testable physical hypothesis. However, the quantitative bridge from the experimental spectra to the central hydration number is not reproducible from the equations as printed, and the uniqueness of the four-Debye decomposition is not demonstrated; consequently the significance of the paper is conditional on these issues being resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (5)] Eq. (5) as written does not reproduce the reported hydration number N_hyd ≈ 5.58. For the 5 vol % sample (x_glyc = 1.27 mol %), Table 1 gives Δε3 = 9.69; with c_gly ≈ 0.69 M and c_water ≈ 53 M, substituting into Eq. (5) yields N_hyd ≈ 66, not 5.58. Replacing Δε3 by Δε4 gives about 10, still not 5.58. The claimed agreement with the MD value of 5.57 is therefore not supported by the equations and numbers as printed. Please correct the formula or the numerical evaluation, and state explicitly the assumption that the bound-water dielectric strength per mole is equal to that of pure water, since Eq. (5) implicitly relies on that assumption.
  2. [§3, Fig. 2, Table 1] The four-Debye decomposition in Eq. (2) is the foundation for all subsequent quantitative claims, but its uniqueness is not demonstrated. The fit has nine free parameters, and uncertainties are reported only for the 19.69 mol % mixture and for pure water; no comparison is made with a three-Debye model or with a distribution of relaxation times. Because the assignments of τ2 and τ3 to confined and hydration-layer water and the values of Δε3 used in Eq. (5) depend on this decomposition, the paper should include a sensitivity analysis, parameter-correlation information, and a statistical justification for preferring four discrete Debye components. The MD long-time tails show an effective slow relaxation of about 28–50 ps but do not directly resolve two separate slow water populations, so they cannot by themselves validate the four-component decomposition.
  3. [§3.2 and §3.3, Figs. 4 and 5] The identification of the critical glycerol concentration of about 7.5 mol % rests on the saturation of Δε3, the onset of Δε2, and the increase of μ_eff, but no uncertainties are provided for these quantities across the concentration series and the crossover is not quantified statistically. Please provide error bars for all fitted dielectric strengths and relaxation times and, if a threshold is claimed, support it with a piecewise-linear fit or an equivalent statistical test showing that the deviation from linearity is significant.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption states that the spectra are for glycerol concentrations from 0 to about 20 mol %, but the inset includes pure glycerol (100%); please clarify that the pure-glycerol data are shown as a reference.
  2. [Table 1] The table lists fitted relaxation times and dielectric strengths without uncertainties for most rows; reporting fit uncertainties for every concentration would make the trends in Figs. 3–5 interpretable.
  3. [§3.4] The MD production runs for the mixtures are only 500 ps, while autocorrelation functions are analyzed out to about 100 ps; please state the statistical uncertainty of the MD relaxation times and justify that the runs are long enough for convergence.
  4. [References] A number of reference entries do not match the topics cited in the text (for example, Ref. 23 is cited as NMR spectroscopy but appears to be a green-chemistry catalysis paper); please verify that all citations correspond to the intended sources.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the Debye-fit results and MD hydration numbers are independent, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central quantities are obtained by fitting the measured complex dielectric spectra to Eq. (2) with free parameters; the pure-water relaxation time (8.27 ps) and pure-glycerol relaxation time (1100 ps) enter only as initial guesses, not as constraints that force the reported mixture values. The assignment of τ3 ≈ 35 ps to hydration-shell water and τ2 ≈ 85 ps to confined water is an interpretation based on time-scale ordering, and it is checked against independent all-atom MD simulations (GROMOS glycerol/SPC/E water) whose computed hydration number N_hyd = 5.57 is not derived from the dielectric fit. Eq. (5) transforms the fitted Δε3 into a hydration number; this is a data-analysis identity rather than a prediction of a quantity already used as input. The ~7.5 mol % crossover is an observed saturation/onset in the fitted dielectric strengths and effective dipole moment, not an assumption imported into the fit. The self-citations (Refs. 25–27, 32) provide earlier methodology and a pure-water reference value; they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem and do not carry the argument. One non-circular caveat: as printed, Eq. (5) does not arithmetically reproduce N_hyd = 5.58 for the Table 1 values (e.g., 5 vol % gives (52.7 − (9.69/73.25)×55.35)/0.69 ≈ 66), so the reported numerical agreement with MD rests on an apparent typo or omitted factor; this is a correctness/consistency issue, not circularity. The uniqueness of the four-Debye decomposition is also assumed rather than proved, which affects uncertainty but does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a fitted four-Debye model, an assumed linear mapping between dielectric strength and water population, and an MD model that is used as confirmation. No new physical entities are introduced. The most consequential unvalidated choice is the number of Debye terms and the one-to-one assignment of components to molecular populations.

free parameters (4)
  • Debye relaxation times τ1-τ4 = ~910 ps, ~85 ps, ~35 ps, ~8.27 ps (at 19.69 mol %)
    The four relaxation times are simultaneously fitted to the real and imaginary dielectric spectra and then assigned to molecular populations; the central picture depends on these fitted values.
  • Debye dielectric strengths Δε1-Δε4 = 1.35, 1.26, 44.47, 8.95 (at 19.69 mol %)
    These strengths are used to compute the hydration number and to locate the saturation crossover; they are fit outputs, not independently derived.
  • Critical glycerol concentration = ~7.5 mol %
    The crossover concentration is selected by visual inspection of trends in Δε2, Δε3, and the effective dipole moment; no quantitative criterion is given.
  • MD primary hydration shell boundaries = 2.3 Å to 3.15 Å
    The shell is defined as the region between the excluded zone and the first minimum; the resulting N_hyd=5.57 is compared with experiment.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The dielectric spectrum is a sum of exactly four Debye relaxation terms (Eq. 2).
    The number of terms is not derived from molecular theory; it is chosen to fit the data. The assignment of each term to a specific molecular population assumes a one-to-one mapping between Debye components and dynamic species.
  • domain assumption Bound water has the same specific dielectric strength as bulk water (used in Eq. 5 to compute N_hyd).
    The hydration number calculation assumes that missing bulk-water signal, normalized by c_pure/Δε_pure, directly equals the number of bound waters; deviations would change N_hyd.
  • domain assumption Kirkwood correlation factor g_K = 1 in the Onsager-Oncley model (Eq. 4).
    The effective dipole moment estimate assumes no angular correlation between dipoles; at finite concentration this is known to fail, so the inferred increase in μ_eff at high concentration may simply reflect g_K ≠ 1.
  • domain assumption SPC/E water and GROMOS force fields reproduce the relative dynamics of hydration-layer, confined, and bulk water despite underestimating absolute relaxation times.
    The MD 'confirmation' relies on the assumption that the ~20-40% SPC/E speed-up applies uniformly to all water populations, so the ordering of relaxation times is preserved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Insights into Hydration Dynamics and Cooperative Interactions in Glycerol-Water Mixtures by Terahertz Dielectric Spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IXCT2KMS

@misc{pith2026190900872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Insights into Hydration Dynamics and Cooperative Interactions in Glycerol-Water Mixtures by Terahertz Dielectric Spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IXCT2KMS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00872}
}
read the original abstract

We report relaxation dynamics of glycerol-water mixtures as probed by megahertz-to-terahertz dielectric spectroscopy in a frequency range from 50 MHz to 0.5 THz at room temperature. The dielectric relaxation spectra reveal several polarization processes at the molecular level with different time constants and dielectric strengths, providing an understanding of the hydrogen-bonding network in glycerol-water mixtures. We have determined the structure of hydration shells around glycerol molecules and the dynamics of bound water as a function of glycerol concentration in solutions using the Debye relaxation model. The experimental results show the existence of a critical glycerol concentration of ~7.5 mol %, which is related to the number of water molecules in the hydration layer around a glycerol molecule. At higher glycerol concentrations, water molecules dispersed in a glycerol network become abundant and eventually dominate and four distinct relaxation processes emerge in the mixtures. The relaxation dynamics and hydration structure in glycerol-water mixtures are further probed with molecular dynamics simulations, which confirm the physical picture revealed by the dielectric spectroscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00872 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Interaction of electromagnetic wave in the megahertz-to-terahertz region with glycerol￾water mixtures providing insight into the molecular dynamics over the picosecond to sub￾microsecond timescales. The imaginary, 𝜖ୱ୭୪ " ሺሻ, and the real, 𝜖ୱ୭୪ ᇱ ሺሻ, (in the inset) components of the dielectric response spectra were collected for aqueous glycerol solutions at various glycerol concentrations. The maximum of the imagi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dielectric response of the 19.69 mol % glycerol-water mixture in the frequency range from 50 MHz to 0.5 THz reflecting the complexity of glycerol-water interactions. The imaginary and the real (in the inset) components of the dielectric spectra have been decomposed in to four relaxational processes with different relaxation time constants. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The dielectric properties of an aqueous solution pr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Results of dielectric relaxation response revealing the existence of several relaxation modes in glycerol-water mixtures. While the relaxation frequency (upper inset) of glycerol, 𝜈ଵ, is almost constant as the glycerol concentration is varied, the dielectric strength, ∆𝜖ଵ ሺሻ, of glycerol￾glycerol interaction increases with an increasing glycerol concentration. In the lower inset, the values of the effective dipole … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dielectric spectra of glycerol mixtures revealing the number of water molecules affected by the presence of glycerol. (a) The dielectric strength of bulk water in glycerol, ∆𝜖ସ ሺሻ, decreases significantly with an increasing glycerol concentration. The solid line (blue…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A slow dynamics of confined water molecules in the glycerol network emerging in the dielectric response of glycerol-water mixtures. Below 7.5 mol %, the contribution the confined water molecules to the dielectric response of glycerol-water mixtures is negligible. Beyon…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relaxation autocorrelation functions, 𝐶ሺ𝑡ሻ, for water and glycerol molecules in glycerol￾water mixtures showing multiple-exponential decay behavior. (a) The relaxation autocorrelation functions and their fitting curves to a stretched-exponential function for pure water…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normalized hydration number functions, 𝑁ሺ𝑟ሻ, in the shell from 𝑟 െ 𝛿𝑟 to 𝑟 ൅ 𝛿𝑟 with 𝛿𝑟 ൌ 0.025 Å, where 𝑟 is the shortest distance between the oxygen atom on a water molecule and an oxygen or a carbon atom on a glycerol molecule. Data are collected for glycerol concen…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N.; Trevino, S.; Prabhakaran, E.; Scholtz, J

    Pace, C. N.; Trevino, S.; Prabhakaran, E.; Scholtz, J. M. Pr otein Structure, Stability and Solubility in Water and Other Solvents. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 2004, 359, 1225-1234

  2. [2]

    R.; Saunders, A

    Davis-Searles, P. R.; Saunders, A. J.; Erie, D. A.; Winzor, D. J.; Pielak, G. J. Interpreting the Effects of Small Uncharged Solutes on Protein-Folding Equilibria. Annu. Rev. Bioph. Biom. 2001, 30, 271-306. 14

  3. [3]

    Gekko, K.; Timasheff, S. N. Mechanism of Protein Stabilizati on by Glycerol - Preferential Hydration in Glycerol- Water Mixtures. Biochemistry 1981, 20, 4667-4676

  4. [4]

    I.; Garcia-Marin, H.; Pires, E

    Garcia, J. I.; Garcia-Marin, H.; Pires, E. Glycerol Based Solvents: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1007-1033

  5. [5]

    L.; Wang, Y

    Jiang, X. L.; Wang, Y. L.; Li , M. G. Selecting Water-Alcohol Mixed Solvent for Synthesis of Polydopamine Nano-Spheres Using Solubility Parameter. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6070

  6. [6]

    S.; Schmuttenmaer , C

    Venables, D. S.; Schmuttenmaer , C. A. Structure and Dynamics of Nonaqueous Mixtures of Dipolar Liquids. II. Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 3249-3260

  7. [7]

    L.; Jerome, F

    Gu, Y. L.; Jerome, F. Glycerol as a Sustainable Solvent for Green Chemistry. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1127-1138

  8. [8]

    Molecular Dynamics S imulations of Glycerol Glass-Forming Liquid

    Blieck, J.; Affouard, F.; Bordat, P.; Lerbret, A.; Descamps, M. Molecular Dynamics S imulations of Glycerol Glass-Forming Liquid. Chem. Phys. 2005, 317, 253-257

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    T.; Soles, C

    Cicerone, M. T.; Soles, C. L. Fast Dynamics and Stabilizatio n of Proteins: Binary Glasses of Trehalose and Glycerol. Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 3836-3845

  2. [10]

    L.; Nucci, N

    Dashnau, J. L.; Nucci, N. V.; Sharp, K. A.; Vanderkooi, J. M. Hydrogen Bonding and the Cryoprotective Properties of Glycerol/Water Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 13670-13677

  3. [11]

    Z.; Song, Y

    Chen, C.; Li, W. Z.; Song, Y. C.; Yang, J. Hydrogen Bonding Analysis of Glycerol Aqueous Solutions: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study. J. Mol. Liq. 2009, 146, 23-28

  4. [12]

    V.; Lyubartsev, A

    Egorov, A. V.; Lyubartsev, A. P.; Laaksonen, A. Molecular D ynamics Simulation Study of Glycerol-Water Liquid Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 14572-14581

  5. [13]

    R.; Matyushov, D

    Seyedi, S.; Martin, D. R.; Matyushov, D. V. Dynamical and O rientational Structural Crossovers in Low- Temperature Glycerol. Phys. Rev. E 2016, 94, 012616

  6. [14]

    Dielectric Properties of Glycerol/Water Mixtures at Temperatures between 10 and 50 oC

    Behrends, R.; Fuchs, K.; Kaa tze, U.; Hayashi, Y.; Feldman, Y. Dielectric Properties of Glycerol/Water Mixtures at Temperatures between 10 and 50 oC. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 144512

  7. [15]

    P.; Gurgel, L

    Novo, L. P.; Gurgel, L. V. A.; Marabezi, K.; Curvelo, A. A. D. Delignification of Sugarcane Bagasse Using Glycerol-Water Mixtures to Produce Pulps for Saccharification. Bioresource Technol. 2011, 102, 10040-10046

  8. [16]

    Effect of G lycerol on Solubilities of Benzene and Toluene in Water

    Ueda, M.; Katayama, A.; Kuroki, N.; Urahata, T. Effect of G lycerol on Solubilities of Benzene and Toluene in Water. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1976, 254, 532-533

  9. [17]

    E.; Balin, I.; Feldman, Y.; Kaatze, U.; Behrends, R

    Puzenko, A.; Hayashi, Y.; Ry abov, Y. E.; Balin, I.; Feldman, Y.; Kaatze, U.; Behrends, R. Relaxation Dynamics in Glycerol-Water Mixtures: I. Glycerol-Rich Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 6031-6035

  10. [18]

    Deficiency in th e Glycerol Channel Fps1p Confers Increased Freeze Tolerance to Yeast Cells: Application of the Fps1 Delta Mutant to Frozen Dough Technology

    Izawa, S.; Ikeda, K.; Maeta, K.; Inoue, Y. Deficiency in th e Glycerol Channel Fps1p Confers Increased Freeze Tolerance to Yeast Cells: Application of the Fps1 Delta Mutant to Frozen Dough Technology. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2004, 66, 303-305

  11. [19]

    R.; Kamiya, N

    Umena, Y.; Kawakami, K.; Shen, J. R.; Kamiya, N. Crystal St ructure of Oxygen-Evolving Photosystem II at a Resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature 2011, 473, 55-60

  12. [20]

    E.; Feldman , Y

    Hayashi, Y.; Puzenko, A.; Balin, I.; Ryabov, Y. E.; Feldman , Y. Relaxation Dynamics in Glycerol-Water Mixtures. 2. Mesoscopic Feature in Water Rich Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 9174-9177

  13. [21]

    R.; Noyel, G

    Huck, J. R.; Noyel, G. A.; J orat, L. J. Dielectric-Properti es of Supercooled Glycerol-Water Solutions. IEEE T. Electr. Insul. 1988, 23, 627-638

  14. [22]

    Broa dband Dielectric Study of Alpha-Beta Separation for Supercooled Glycerol-Water Mixtures

    Sudo, S.; Shimomura, M.; Shinyashiki, N.; Yagihara, S. Broa dband Dielectric Study of Alpha-Beta Separation for Supercooled Glycerol-Water Mixtures. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2002, 307, 356-363

  15. [23]

    P.; Camy, S.; Con doret, J

    Delample, M.; Villandier, N.; Douliez, J. P.; Camy, S.; Con doret, J. S.; Pouilloux, Y.; Barrault, J.; Jerome, F. Glycerol as a Cheap, Safe and Sust ainable Solvent for the Catal ytic and Regioselective ,-Diarylation of Acrylates over Palladium Nanoparticles. Green Chem. 201...

  16. [24]

    Mudalige, A.; Pemberton, J. E. Raman Spectroscopy of Glycerol/D2O Solutions. Vib. Spectrosc. 2007, 45, 27-35

  17. [25]

    K.; Mitchell-Koch, K

    Charkhesht, A.; Regmi, C. K.; Mitchell-Koch, K. R.; Cheng, S.; Vinh, N. Q. High-Precision Megahertz-to- Terahertz Dielectric Spectroscopy of Protein Collective Motions and Hydration Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 6341-6350

  18. [26]

    K.; Charkhesht, A.; Hull, O

    George, D. K.; Charkhesht, A.; Hull, O. A.; Mishra, A.; Cap elluto, D. G. S.; Mitchell-Koch, K. R.; Vinh, N. Q. New Insights into the Dynamics of Zwitterionic Micelles and Their Hydration Waters by Gigahertz-to-Terahertz Dielectric Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 10757-10767

  19. [27]

    Q.; Allen, S

    Vinh, N. Q.; Allen, S. J.; Plaxco, K. W. Dielectric Spectro scopy of Proteins as a Quantitative Experimental Test of Computational Models of Their Low-Frequency Harmonic Motions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 8942-8947

  20. [28]

    K.; Charkhesht, A.; Vinh, N

    George, D. K.; Charkhesht, A.; Vinh, N. Q. New Terahertz Di electric Spectroscopy for the Study of Aqueous Solutions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2015, 86, 123105

  21. [29]

    Slow and Fast Dynamics in Glycerol-Water Mixtures

    Hayashi, Y.; Puzenko, A.; Feldman, Y. Slow and Fast Dynamics in Glycerol-Water Mixtures. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 4696-4703. 15

  22. [30]

    Dielectric Spectroscopy of Micelle Hydration and Dynamics in Aqueous Ionic Surfactant Solutions

    Buchner, R.; Baar, C.; Fernan dez, P.; Schrodle, S.; Kunz, W. Dielectric Spectroscopy of Micelle Hydration and Dynamics in Aqueous Ionic Surfactant Solutions. J. Mol. Liq. 2005, 118, 179-187

  23. [31]

    A Complex Plane Representation of Dielectric and Mechanical Relaxation Processes in Some Polymers

    Havriliak, S.; Negami, S. A Complex Plane Representation of Dielectric and Mechanical Relaxation Processes in Some Polymers. Polymer 1967, 8, 161-210

  24. [32]

    Q.; Sherwin, M

    Vinh, N. Q.; Sherwin, M. S.; Allen, S. J.; George, D. K.; Rahmani, A. J.; Plaxco, K. W. High-Precision Gigahertz- to-Terahertz Spectroscopy of Aqueous Salt Solutions as a Probe of the Femtosecond-to-Picosecond Dynamics of Liquid Water. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 164502

  25. [33]

    Ellison, W. J. Permittivity of Pure Water, at Standard Atmospheric Pressure, over the Frequency Range 0-25 THz and the Temperature Range 0-100 oC. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2007, 36, 1-18

  26. [34]

    T.; May, P

    Buchner, R.; Hefter, G. T.; May, P. M. Dielectric Relaxation of Aqueous NaCl Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 1-9

  27. [35]

    C.; Reinisch, L.; Reynolds, A

    Beece, D.; Eisenstein, L.; Frauenfelder, H.; Good, D.; Mard en, M. C.; Reinisch, L.; Reynolds, A. H.; Sorensen, L. B.; Yue, K. T. Solvent Viscosity and Protein Dynamics. Biochemistry 1980, 19, 5147-5157

  28. [36]

    Diele ctric and Far-Infrared Spectroscopy of Glycerol

    Schneider, U.; Lunkenheimer, P.; Brand, R.; Loidl, A. Diele ctric and Far-Infrared Spectroscopy of Glycerol. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1998, 235, 173-179

  29. [37]

    Dielectric and Electronic Properties of Biological Materials

    Pethig, R. Dielectric and Electronic Properties of Biological Materials. John Wiley & Sons, 1979

  30. [38]

    Cheng, N. S. Formula for the Viscosity of a Glycerol-Water Mixture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 3285-3288

  31. [39]

    D.; Zeuthen, T

    Stein, W. D.; Zeuthen, T. Molecular Mechanisms of Water Transport Across Biological Membranes . Elsevier Science, 2002; Vol. 215

  32. [40]

    Pethig, R.; Kell, D. B. The Passive Electrical-Properties of Biological-Systems - Their Significance in Physiology, Biophysics and Biotechnology. Phys. Med. Biol. 1987, 32, 933-970

  33. [41]

    Dielectric Behaviour of Biolog ical Molecules in Solution

    Grant, E.; Sheppard, R.; South, G. Dielectric Behaviour of Biolog ical Molecules in Solution . Clarendon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1978

  34. [42]

    Reis, J. C. R.; Iglesias, T. P. Kirkwood Correlation Factor s in Liquid Mixtures from an Extended Onsager- Kirkwood-Frohlich Equation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 10670-10680

  35. [43]

    Cametti, C.; Marchetti, S.; Gambi, C. M. C.; Onori, G. Dielectric Relaxation Spectroscopy of Lysozyme Aqueous Solutions: Analysis of the Delta-Dispersion and the Contribution of the Hydration Water. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 7144-7153

  36. [44]

    Liquid Structure of the Urea-Water System Studied by Dielectric Spectroscopy

    Hayashi, Y.; Katsumoto, Y.; Omori, S.; Kishii, N.; Yasuda, A. Liquid Structure of the Urea-Water System Studied by Dielectric Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 1076-1080

  37. [45]

    What Can Re ally Be Learned from Dielectric Spectroscopy of Protein Solutions? A Case Study of Ribonuclease A

    Oleinikova, A.; Sasisanker, P.; Weingartner, H. What Can Re ally Be Learned from Dielectric Spectroscopy of Protein Solutions? A Case Study of Ribonuclease A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 8467-8474

  38. [46]

    Complex Permittivity of Water as a Function of F requency and Temperature

    Kaatze, U. Complex Permittivity of Water as a Function of F requency and Temperature. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 1989, 34, 371-374

  39. [47]

    A.; Saiz, L.; Guardia, E

    Padro, J. A.; Saiz, L.; Guardia, E. Hydrogen Bonding in Liq uid Alcohols: a Computer Simulation Study. J. Mol. Struct. 1997, 416, 243-248

  40. [48]

    Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molec ular Dynamics

    Plimpton, S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molec ular Dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 1-19

  41. [49]

    K.; Zuo, L.; Breeze, M.; Stroet, M.; Poger, D.; Nair, P

    Malde, A. K.; Zuo, L.; Breeze, M.; Stroet, M.; Poger, D.; Nair, P. C.; Oostenbrink, C.; Mark, A. E. An Automated Force Field Topology Builder (ATB) and Repository: Version 1.0. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 2011, 7, 4026- 4037

  42. [50]

    E.; Van Gunsteren, W

    Oostenbrink, C.; Villa, A.; Mark, A. E.; Van Gunsteren, W. F. A Biomolecular Force Field Based on the Free Enthalpy of Hydration and Solvation: The GROMOS Force-Field Par ameter Sets 53A5 and 53A6. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1656-1676

  43. [51]

    Berendsen, H. J. C.; Grigera, J. R.; Straatsma, T. P. The Missing Term in Effective Pair Potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269-6271

  44. [52]

    G.; Stillinger, F

    Chatterjee, S.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Stillinger, F. H.; Lynd en-Bell, R. M. A Computational Investigation of Thermodynamics, Structure, Dynamics and Solvation Behavior in Modified Water Models. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 124511

  45. [53]

    1H Nuclear Spin Relaxation of Liquid Water from Molecular Dynami cs Simulations

    Calero, C.; Martí, J.; Guàrdia, E. 1H Nuclear Spin Relaxation of Liquid Water from Molecular Dynami cs Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 1966-1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.