Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Bug or a Suggestion? An Automatic Way to Label Issues

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.00934 v1 pith:OQBFCIKI submitted 2019-09-03 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords issuesitssbugsapproachissueotheracrossapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

More and more users and developers are using Issue Tracking Systems (ITSs) to report issues, including bugs, feature requests, enhancement suggestions, etc. Different information, however, is gathered from users when issues are reported on different ITSs, which presents considerable challenges for issue classification tools to work effectively across the ITSs. Besides, bugs often take higher priority when it comes to classifying the issues, while existing approaches to issue classification seldom focus on distinguishing bugs and the other non-bug issues, leading to suboptimal accuracy in bug identification. In this paper, we propose a deep learning-based approach to automatically identify bug-reporting issues across various ITSs. The approach implements the k-NN algorithm to detect and correct misclassifications in data extracted from the ITSs, and trains an attention-based bi-directional long short-term memory (ABLSTM) network using a dataset of over 1.2 million labelled issues to identify bug reports. Experimental evaluation shows that our approach achieved an F-measure of 85.6\% in distinguishing bugs and other issues, significantly outperforming the other benchmark and state-of-the-art approaches examined in the experiment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Applying Large Language Models to Issue Classification: Revisiting with Extended Data and New Models

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned GPT-4o classifies GitHub issue types with about 86% F1 on NLBSE 2024 data, while a much larger NLBSE 2023 dataset does not improve results.

Pith tools