Torsion and anomalies in the warped limit of Lifschitz theories

Christian Copetti

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Torsion and anomalies in the warped limit of Lifschitz theories

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that in the warped ($z\to 0$) limit of a fermionic Lifschitz theory, background torsion makes the anisotropic translation symmetry anomalous, with covariant coefficient $\kappa=q^3/(32\pi^2)$; the same anomaly…

desk verdict A suggestive and honest paper that identifies a new torsional anomaly in the warped limit of Lifshitz fermions, but the headline coefficient is fixed by a regulator choice and an order of limits that are not independently justified. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01157 v2 pith:24FKGX23 submitted 2019-09-03 hep-th cond-mat.mes-hall

Christian Copetti This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thcond-mat.mes-hall

keywords LifschitzscalingwarpedconformalfieldtheoryCarrolliansymmetrytorsionalanomalyanisotropictranslationFujikawaregulatorWess-Zuminoconsistencyconditionsanomaloustransport

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that in the warped ($z\to 0$) limit of a fermionic Lifschitz theory, the current $\pi^\mu$ conjugate to anisotropic translations ceases to be conserved when the background carries torsion. The violation is the Ward identity $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}\partial_\mu\left(\sqrt{g}\,\pi^\mu\right)=\kappa\,\$epsilon^{{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}}$T_{\mu\nu}T_{\rho\$\sigma$},$$ with $\kappa=q^3/(32\pi^2)$ for the covariant current and one third of that for the consistent current, where $q$ is the marginal coupling of the Lifschitz theory. The result is obtained both by a direct Fujikawa computation of the fermion path-integral Jacobian and by solving Wess-Zumino consistency conditions in Carrollian geometry. A sympathetic reader should care because the calculation turns a previously computed one-loop transport coefficient into a genuine, counterterm-independent quantum anomaly, and it connects Lifschitz critical points with warped conformal field theories and chiral-anomaly physics.

What carries the argument

The machinery has two faces. On the microscopic side, the Fujikawa-regulated Jacobian uses the covariant regulator $R=A^\dagger A$ with $A=i\gamma^a\nabla_a/(q\Lambda_1)+s(i\nabla_v/q)^{1/z}/\Lambda_2$; the commutator $[\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu]=-T_{\mu\nu}\nabla_v+R^{ab}{}_{\mu\nu}J_{ab}$ makes torsion, through $T_{\mu\nu}=-\partial_{[\mu}n_{\nu]}$, the only source of the anomaly, and after momentum rescaling each torsional contribution carries $\Lambda_2^{3z}$, so it survives as a finite integral only in the order $z\to0$ before $\Lambda_2\to\infty$. On the geometric side, the same physics is carried by the invariant curvature $F(\Pi)=d(n-M)$ obtained from the Carrollian connection once the constraints $F(P)^a=F(C)^a=0$ are imposed; the anomaly is the descent of $\kappa\int(n-M)F(\Pi)^2$ in four dimensions and $\kappa\int(n-M)F(\Pi)$ in two dimensions. The powers of $q$ are fixed by the spurionic rescaling symmetry $x^\mu\to r x^\mu$, $q\to r^{-1}q$, and in the free warped theory $q$ is the anisotropic momentum of the nontrivial modes.

What would settle it

Evaluate the same one-loop Jacobian or the two-point function of $\pi^\mu$ with the orders of limits reversed, $\Lambda\to\infty$ at fixed small $z$ and then $z\to0$; the paper's own scaling shows the torsional term carries $\Lambda_2^{3z}$, so the finite coefficient $\kappa=q^3/(32\pi^2)$ should disappear. A lattice or Pauli-Villars computation that produces a different finite coefficient would likewise falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the anisotropic translation Ward identity of the Lifschitz fermion is anomalous in the warped limit: the regulated Jacobian for an anisotropic translation $\theta\nabla_v$ is finite and equals $\theta\,s\,q^3/(32\pi^2)\,\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}T_{\mu\nu}T_{\rho\sigma}$ in four dimensions, and $q^2/(8\pi)\,\epsilon^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}$ in two dimensions, with the UV cutoff dependence disappearing because torsional contributions scale as $\Lambda_2^{3z}$ before the $z\to0$ limit. The same anomaly is recovered from the descent equations in Carrollian geometry: imposing the curvature constraints $F(P)^a=F(C)^a=0$ produces a Stueckelberg field $M$ and an invariant curvature $F(\Pi)=d(n-M)$, whose powers give the anomaly polynomial. The consistent and covariant currents differ by Bardeen counterterms, so the consistent coefficient is $s q^3/(96\pi^2)$ in four dimensions, three times smaller than the covariant coefficient. Both match the torsional transport response of the Lifschitz theory obtained earlier by Kubo formulas.

Load-bearing premise

The finite anomaly coefficient depends on taking the warped limit $z\to0$ before the ultraviolet cutoff $\Lambda\to\infty$, and on a regulator that respects the spurionic rescaling symmetry; the symmetries do not fix that regulator uniquely.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Anisotropic translations are not an exact quantum symmetry of the warped Lifschitz fermion: when torsion is present, the Ward identity for $\pi^\mu$ is violated by a term that cannot be removed by local counterterms without breaking a different symmetry.
The anomalous transport coefficients computed by Kubo formulas are reproduced from the anomaly: the consistent current responds to an anisotropic chemical potential with coefficient $q^3/(96\pi^2)$ in four dimensions, while the covariant current's response is three times larger.
In two dimensions, the anomaly reproduces the Virasoro times U(1) Kac-Moody structure of warped conformal field theories, with anisotropic translations behaving like a chiral U(1) symmetry whose level is set by $q^2$.
The warped limit of the Lifschitz fermion is a free warped CFT of the 'bc' type; its anisotropic momentum current is proportional to $q$ on shell, so the marginal coupling acts as a fixed internal charge for the Carrollian modes.
At finite anisotropic velocity, torsion whose dislocation charge overlaps the velocity creates localized anisotropic momentum density, giving a macroscopic, dislocation-sourced signature of the anomaly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A supersymmetric or alternative regulator computation could settle whether the mixed translation-Lorentz anomaly $\kappa_g\int\theta F(J)^{ab}F(J)_{ab}$ is present; the paper leaves this term undetermined, and its presence would imply a warped analogue of the chiral vortical effect.
The identification of $q$ with the anisotropic momentum of a projective chiral charge suggests that any deformation preserving the spurionic symmetry preserves the anomaly coefficient, while deformations breaking it could move the theory away from the warped fixed point; this is a testable statement about the renormalization-group flow.
A lattice or tight-binding realization of the warped fermion with prescribed dislocations could observe the predicted momentum density localized where the dislocation charge and the velocity overlap, providing a tabletop test of the anomaly coefficient.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my read. The genuinely new thing is the claim that in the z→0 warped limit, anisotropic translations develop a torsional anomaly of the form (0.15)–(0.16), together with a four-dimensional WZ solution that extends the 2d warped-CFT analysis. The author does the honest work: the Fujikawa Jacobian is computed explicitly, the two methods agree on the form of the anomaly, and the text is upfront that descent does not fix coefficients and that the mixed Lorentz anomaly is left open. Section 3's free-field realization, where anisotropic momentum becomes a chiral U(1) charge, makes the q^3 scaling plausible and is a nice structural insight. The citation pattern is reasonable—self-citing [1] is appropriate since this is a direct extension.

The stress-test concern lands, though. The coefficient q^3/(32π^2) is carried entirely by the regulated Jacobian. The regulator R = A†A is admitted not to be fixed by the symmetries, and the finite result uses the specific spurionic scaling Λ_2 = q^{1/z-1} \tilde{Λ}_2 plus the order z→0 before Λ→∞. Change either, and the term scales as Λ_2^{3z} and drops out or the coefficient changes. WZ consistency constrains the form, not κ; the sentence that descent 'essentially proves regulator-independence' goes beyond what the logic gives. So the central quantitative claim is conditional, not closed.

I don't want to overstate the damage. The form of the anomaly is robust, the free-field pictures support the q-dependence, and the transport section is explicitly presented as reproducing [1], not as new data. The paper is unusually candid about its own limitations ('somewhat cavalier', open questions). For a specialist in non-relativistic anomalies or warped CFTs, this is a useful contribution even if the final coefficient needs independent confirmation.

Verdict: deserves a serious referee. Not a desk reject. A referee should focus on regulator independence and the order-of-limits choice, but the paper's framework and explicit computations are worth taking seriously. I'd accept it conditionally and let the revision process sharpen the claims.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies fermionic Lifshitz theories in the limit where the anisotropic scaling exponent z is sent to zero, which is argued to produce an enhanced Carrollian boost symmetry. The main claim is that in this warped limit the translation symmetry in the anisotropic direction is anomalous: the regulated Fujikawa Jacobian gives a covariant anomaly 1/sqrt(g) partial_mu(sqrt(g) pi^mu) = kappa epsilon^{mu nu rho sigma} T_{mu nu} T_{rho sigma} with kappa = q^3/(32 pi^2), and the Wess-Zumino consistency conditions fix the form of the anomaly as kappa times the appropriate descent of F(Π)^3. The paper also derives the corresponding consistent anomaly, matches the transport response to the Kubo-formula results of [1], and identifies the warped limit of the Lifshitz fermion with a free warped CFT (the 'bc' system). Anomalies are interpreted as sourced by torsion in a Carrollian/Newton-Cartan geometry.

Significance. If the central coefficient kappa = q^3/(32 pi^2) is regulator-independent, the paper gives a genuine 't Hooft anomaly interpretation of the torsional response computed in [1], connecting Lifshitz critical points, Carrollian geometry, and warped CFTs. The paper contains explicit computations rather than a purely effective argument: the Fujikawa determinant is evaluated, the WZ consistency conditions are solved, and the transport predictions are matched to the microscopic Kubo result. The distinction between covariant and consistent anomalies and the identification of the consistent coefficient as one third of the covariant one are coherent. The main weakness is that the numerical coefficient is carried entirely by a particular regulator choice and a particular order of limits, and the paper admits that the regulator is not uniquely fixed by the symmetries; the WZ consistency conditions constrain the form of the anomaly but not its coefficient.

major comments (3)

[Section 1.1, Eqs. (1.11)-(1.13); Section 2.1, Eqs. (2.37)-(2.52)] The coefficient kappa = q^3/(32 pi^2) in (0.16) and (1.25) is not protected by the WZ consistency conditions. The descent equations constrain the anomaly to be of the form kappa times the integral of theta F(Pi)^2, but they do not determine kappa, as the paper itself states in Section 2.1. The regulator R = A^dagger A is explicitly admitted to be 'not fixed completely' by the four listed conditions. A different regulator satisfying the same conditions, for example R = (A^dagger A)^2 or a different relative normalization of the two kinetic terms in (1.13), would generically change the finite coefficient. Therefore the Introduction's statement that 'the descent procedure essentially proves regulator-independence' is not supported by the arguments in the paper; the coefficient needs an independent confirmation, such as a computation with a second admissible regulator, a Pauli-Villars regulator, or an index-theorem argument.
[Section 1.1, Eq. (1.24); Appendix A; Appendix B] The finite value in (1.25) depends on taking z -> 0 before Lambda -> infinity. For any fixed z > 0 the term in (1.24) is proportional to Lambda_2^{3z} and is therefore a divergent, cutoff-dependent artifact; only after taking z to zero first does the coefficient become finite. The paper explicitly chooses this order ('we will take the Lambdas to be large but finite and take the limits z -> 0 and Lambda -> infinity in this order'), but no independent physical justification is given for why this order is the correct one for a Lifshitz theory that is defined at nonzero z. The same order of limits is used in the Appendix B Kubo computation. The paper should either justify this order from a concrete scaling limit of the microscopic theory or demonstrate that the coefficient is robust under a different order of limits.
[Section 1.1, paragraph after Eq. (1.25); Section 2.1, Eqs. (2.50)-(2.52)] The mixed translation-Lorentz anomaly, parametrized by kappa_g in (2.50), is left undetermined. The paper states that the Fujikawa evaluation in its regularization scheme is 'extremely cumbersome' and that such a contribution 'does not seem to be present,' but no proof is given. Since the invariant polynomial (2.50) includes the mixed term and the paper later invokes it to speculate about a chiral-vortical analogue, the full anomaly polynomial is not closed. This does not directly affect the torsional coefficient (0.16), but it should be presented as an open issue rather than as a completed anomaly analysis.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] The name 'Lifshitz' is misspelled as 'Lifschitz' in many places; typos include 'heath kernel' (Eq. 1.11), 'respenct' (Section 1), 'parmaters' (Section 1), and 'adsorbed' (Section 1.1).
[Eq. (1.21)] The limit is written as 'lim_{z->}' with the subscript 0 missing; it should read lim_{z->0}.
[Eq. (D.20)] The anomaly expression contains a dangling '+' after '3 rho^2'; presumably a term was omitted during typesetting.
[Appendix A, Eq. (A.7)] The notation 'Ref_av^gamma_ef' is not defined; please specify the curvature component and how it arises in the expansion.
[Section 2.2] The text says 'give new predictions in two dimensions in some special cases' but the following analysis treats four dimensions; clarify the intended scope.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the anomaly coefficient is computed from the regulated Jacobian, and the self-cited transport results enter only as a consistency check.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim, κ = q^3/(32π^2), is not fitted or imported by construction. It is obtained in Section 1.1 by an explicit Fujikawa computation: equation (1.25) gives A_warped(θ) = θ s q^3/(32π^2) ε^{μνρσ} T_{μν} T_{ρσ} after evaluating the regulated Jacobian and taking the warped limit. No transport or Kubo input from [1] appears in that computation. The Wess-Zumino consistency conditions in Section 2.1 fix the form of the anomaly, not its coefficient; the paper explicitly says "the descent equations do not fix the anomaly coefficients," and then uses the Section 1.1 computation as the microscopic input for κ. Section 2.2 reproduces the [1] transport coefficient, but only after κ has already been determined microscopically: equation (2.69) identifies the consistent-anomaly coefficient as κ = s q^3/(96π^2), which is one third of the covariant coefficient computed in Section 1, and the matching to [1] is a consistency check rather than a fit. The admitted regulator ambiguity ("The choice of R is dictated by the symmetries of the problem, although they do not fix it completely") and the z→0-before-Λ→∞ order of limits are robustness concerns about regulator dependence, not circular reductions: the coefficient is evaluated, not set equal to the target by definition. The self-citation to [1] is therefore not load-bearing for the anomaly derivation, and no step of the derivation reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the microscopic Lifshitz action (with marginal coupling q and exponent z), on the specific Fujikawa regulator and the order of limits z-to-0 before Lambda-to-infinity, and on the Carrollian geometric setup with curvature constraints F(P) = F(C) = 0. No data are fitted; the only numerical input is the model itself. The coefficient q^3/(32*pi^2) is a computed output, not a fit. The free parameter q is a coupling of the theory whose value is not determined by the anomaly computation.

free parameters (1)

marginal coupling q of the Lifshitz action = not fixed (appears as q^3 in anomaly coefficient)
q sets the relative normalization of the isotropic and anisotropic kinetic terms in (0.3)-(0.6). The final anomaly coefficient kappa = s q^3/(32*pi^2) is proportional to q^3; the paper does not determine q from first principles, but interprets it as the anisotropic momentum or charge of warped modes.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The Lifshitz fermion action (0.6) with M_z = (i nabla_v / q)^(1/z) describes the quantum critical point, with z taking discrete values that ensure locality.
The analysis starts from this microscopic action; the physical realization as a Weyl-semimetal/insulator transition is assumed.
ad hoc to paper The heat-kernel regulator R = A-dagger A with two independent cutoffs and the spurionic scaling fixing Lambda_2 = q^(1/z-1) Lambda-tilde_2 is an admissible regularization.
The regulator is not uniquely fixed by the symmetries; the final anomaly is claimed to be independent of Lambda_1, Lambda_2 in the warped limit, but the regulator choice and the order of limits are specific to this computation.
ad hoc to paper The limit z-to-0 is taken before Lambda-to-infinity in the Fujikawa trace.
This ordering is essential: with the opposite order, torsional terms scale as Lambda^(3z) and no finite anomaly appears. The paper states this order explicitly in Section 1.1.
domain assumption Carrollian geometry with curvature constraints F(P)^a = F(C)^a = 0 is the correct background for anomaly classification; this guarantees existence of the Stueckelberg field M.
Used in Section 2 to define the invariant curvature F(Pi) = d(n - M) and construct Chern-Simons terms; different constraint choices would change the form of the anomaly.
domain assumption The warped limit of the Lifshitz fermion is a free warped CFT in the bc representation, with q as the projective charge.
Section 3 argues this from scaling dimensions and equations of motion; the identification is explicit but the emergence is shown classically only.
standard math Descent equations and Wess-Zumino consistency conditions are the correct method to classify consistent anomalies.
Standard and accepted in quantum field theory.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Torsion and anomalies in the warped limit of Lifschitz theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/24FKGX23

@misc{pith2026190901157,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Torsion and anomalies in the warped limit of Lifschitz theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/24FKGX23}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01157}
}

read the original abstract

We describe the physics of fermionic Lifschitz theories once the anisotropicscaling exponent is made arbitrarily small. In this limit the system acquires an enhanced(Carrollian) boost symmetry. We show, both through the explicit computation of the pathintegral Jacobian and through the solution of the Wess-Zumino consistency conditions, thatthe translation symmetry in the anisotropic direction becomes anomalous. This turns outto be a mixed anomaly between boosts and translations. In a Newton-Cartan formulationof the space-time geometry such anomaly is sourced by torsion. We use these results togive an effective field theory description of the anomalous transport coefficients, which wereoriginally computed through Kubo formulas in [1]. Along the way we provide a link withwarped CFTs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

The Energy-Momentum-News Complex near Future Null Infinity
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

A Carroll-covariant energy-momentum-news complex at future null infinity yields Ward identities that generalise the Bondi loss equations, with an anomalous Carroll boost.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Copetti and K

C. Copetti and K. Landsteiner, Anomalous hall viscosity at the weyl semimetal/insulator transition, arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11403 (2019)

arXiv 2019
[2]

Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions , Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials (2007)

S. Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions , Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials (2007)

work page 2007
[3]

N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (Jan, 2018) 015001

work page 2018
[4]

Landsteiner, Y

K. Landsteiner, Y. Liu and Y.-W. Sun, Odd viscosity in the quantum critical region of a holographic Weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 081604, [ 1604.01346]

arXiv 2016
[5]

J. M. Link, B. N. Narozhny and J. Schmalian, Out-of-bounds hydrodynamics in anisotropic Dirac ﬂuids, 1708.02759

arXiv
[6]

Berry curvature and Hall viscosities in an anisotropic Dirac semi-metal

F. Pena-Benitez, K. Saha and P. Surowka, Berry curvature and Hall viscosities in an anisotropic Dirac semi-metal, 1805.09827

work page Pith review arXiv
[7]

Viscoelastic response of quantum Hall fluids in a tilted field

B. Oﬀertaler and B. Bradlyn, Viscoelastic response of quantum Hall ﬂuids in a tilted ﬁeld , 1811.08443

work page Pith review arXiv
[8]

Duval and P

C. Duval and P. A. Horvathy, Non-relativistic conformal symmetries and Newton-Cartan structures, J. Phys. A42 (2009) 465206, [ 0904.0531]

arXiv 2009

Show all 58 references

[9]

Jensen, On the coupling of Galilean-invariant ﬁeld theories to curved spacetime , SciPost Phys

K. Jensen, On the coupling of Galilean-invariant ﬁeld theories to curved spacetime , SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 011, [ 1408.6855]

2018 arXiv
[10]

D. T. Son and P. Surowka, Hydrodynamics with Triangle Anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 191601, [ 0906.5044]

2009 arXiv
[11]

D. E. Kharzeev and H.-U. Yee, Chiral Magnetic Wave , Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 085007, [1012.6026]

2011 arXiv
[12]

D. E. Kharzeev, The Chiral Magnetic Eﬀect and Anomaly-Induced Transport , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75 (2014) 133–151, [ 1312.3348]

2014 arXiv
[13]

Jensen, Locality and anomalies in warped conformal ﬁeld theory , Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (2017) 111

K. Jensen, Locality and anomalies in warped conformal ﬁeld theory , Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (2017) 111

2017
[14]

Landsteiner, Notes on Anomaly Induced Transport, in 56th Cracow School of Theoretical Physics: A Panorama of Holography Zakopane, Poland, May 24-June 1, 2016 , 2016

K. Landsteiner, Notes on Anomaly Induced Transport, in 56th Cracow School of Theoretical Physics: A Panorama of Holography Zakopane, Poland, May 24-June 1, 2016 , 2016. 1610.04413

2016 arXiv
[15]

Fujikawa, Path-integral measure for gauge-invariant fermion theories , Physical Review Letters 42 (1979) 1195

K. Fujikawa, Path-integral measure for gauge-invariant fermion theories , Physical Review Letters 42 (1979) 1195

1979
[16]

D. M. Hofman and A. Strominger, Chiral scale and conformal invariance in 2d quantum ﬁeld theory, Physical review letters 107 (2011) 161601

2011
[17]

D. M. Hofman and B. Rollier, Warped conformal ﬁeld theory as lower spin gravity , Nuclear Physics B 897 (2015) 1–38

2015
[18]

Wess and B

J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous Ward identities , Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95–97

1971
[19]

Hartong, Gauging the carroll algebra and ultra-relativistic gravity , Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015) 69

J. Hartong, Gauging the carroll algebra and ultra-relativistic gravity , Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015) 69. – 35 –

2015
[20]

Detournay, T

S. Detournay, T. Hartman and D. M. Hofman, Warped conformal ﬁeld theory, Physical Review D 86 (2012) 124018

2012
[21]

Duval, G

C. Duval, G. Gibbons, P. Horvathy and P. Zhang, Carroll versus newton and galilei: two dual non-einsteinian concepts of time , Classical and Quantum Gravity 31 (2014) 085016

2014
[22]

W. A. Bardeen and B. Zumino, Consistent and Covariant Anomalies in Gauge and Gravitational Theories, Nucl. Phys. B244 (1984) 421–453

1984
[23]

Bergshoeﬀ, J

E. Bergshoeﬀ, J. M. Izquierdo, T. Ortin and L. Romano, Lie algebra expansions and actions for non-relativistic gravity, arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08304 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[24]

Chandia and J

O. Chandia and J. Zanelli, Topological invariants, instantons, and the chiral anomaly on spaces with torsion, Physical Review D 55 (1997) 7580

1997
[25]

T. L. Hughes, R. G. Leigh and E. Fradkin, Torsional response and dissipationless viscosity in topological insulators, Physical review letters 107 (2011) 075502

2011
[26]

T. L. Hughes, R. G. Leigh and O. Parrikar, Torsional anomalies, hall viscosity, and bulk-boundary correspondence in topological states, Physical Review D 88 (2013) 025040

2013
[27]

Bastianelli and P

F. Bastianelli and P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, Path integrals and anomalies in curved space . Cambridge University Press, 2006

2006
[28]

Fujikawa, K

K. Fujikawa, K. Fujikawa, H. Suzuki et al., Path integrals and quantum anomalies , vol. 122. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2004

2004
[29]

R. A. Bertlmann, Anomalies in quantum ﬁeld theory . Oxford, UK: Clarendon (1996) 566 p. (International series of monographs on physics: 91), 1996

1996
[30]

Duval, G

C. Duval, G. Gibbons and P. Horvathy, Conformal carroll groups and bms symmetry , Classical and Quantum Gravity 31 (2014) 092001

2014
[31]

Banerjee, A

R. Banerjee, A. Mitra and P. Mukherjee, Localization of the Galilean symmetry and dynamical realization of Newton-Cartan geometry , Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 045010, [1407.3617]

2015 arXiv
[32]

Bergshoeﬀ, J

E. Bergshoeﬀ, J. Gomis and G. Longhi, Dynamics of carroll particles , Classical and Quantum Gravity 31 (2014) 205009

2014
[33]

Bergshoeﬀ, J

E. Bergshoeﬀ, J. Gomis, B. Rollier, J. Rosseel and T. Ter Veldhuis, Carroll versus galilei gravity, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (2017) 165

2017
[34]

Jensen, Anomalies for Galilean ﬁelds , SciPost Phys

K. Jensen, Anomalies for Galilean ﬁelds , SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 005, [ 1412.7750]

2018 arXiv
[35]

Bekaert and K

X. Bekaert and K. Morand, Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective , J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) 072503, [1505.03739]

2018 arXiv
[36]

Morand, Embedding Galilean and Carrollian geometries I

K. Morand, Embedding Galilean and Carrollian geometries I. Gravitational waves , 1811.12681

arXiv
[37]

Donnay and C

L. Donnay and C. Marteau, Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon , 1903.09654

1903 arXiv
[38]

Bekaert and K

X. Bekaert and K. Morand, Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity I. An intrinsic view , J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016) 022507, [ 1412.8212]

2016 arXiv
[39]

Duval, G

C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons and P. A. Horvathy, Conformal Carroll groups , J. Phys. A47 (2014) 335204, [ 1403.4213]. – 36 –

2014 arXiv
[40]

Ciambelli and C

L. Ciambelli and C. Marteau, Carrollian conservation laws and Ricci-ﬂat gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 085004, [ 1810.11037]

2019 arXiv
[41]

Bonora, M

L. Bonora, M. Martellini and Y. Zhang, Aﬃne cs theories, aﬃne wznw models and integrable models, Physics Letters B 253 (1991) 373–379

1991
[42]

Papageorgiou and B

G. Papageorgiou and B. J. Schroers, A chern-simons approach to galilean quantum gravity in 2+ 1 dimensions , Journal of High Energy Physics 2009 (2009) 009

2009
[43]

Hartong, Y

J. Hartong, Y. Lei and N. A. Obers, Nonrelativistic Chern-Simons theories and three-dimensional Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 065027, [ 1604.08054]

2016 arXiv
[44]

Castro, D

A. Castro, D. M. Hofman and G. S´ arosi, Warped weyl fermion partition functions , Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015) 129

2015
[45]

Afshar, S

H. Afshar, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller and B. Oblak, Near-Horizon Geometry and Warped Conformal Symmetry, JHEP 03 (2016) 187, [ 1512.08233]

2016 arXiv
[46]

C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey, Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls , Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 427–436

1985
[47]

Jensen, Triangle Anomalies, Thermodynamics, and Hydrodynamics , Phys

K. Jensen, Triangle Anomalies, Thermodynamics, and Hydrodynamics , Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 125017, [ 1203.3599]

2012 arXiv
[48]

Jensen, R

K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam and A. Yarom, Thermodynamics, gravitational anomalies and cones, JHEP 02 (2013) 088, [ 1207.5824]

2013 arXiv
[49]

Jensen, R

K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam and A. Yarom, Anomaly inﬂow and thermal equilibrium , JHEP 05 (2014) 134, [ 1310.7024]

2014 arXiv
[50]

Jensen, R

K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam and A. Yarom, Chern-Simons terms from thermal circles and anomalies, JHEP 05 (2014) 110, [ 1311.2935]

2014 arXiv
[51]

Jensen, P

K. Jensen, P. Kovtun and A. Ritz, Chiral conductivities and eﬀective ﬁeld theory , JHEP 10 (2013) 186, [ 1307.3234]

2013 arXiv
[52]

Stone and J

M. Stone and J. Kim, Mixed anomalies: Chiral vortical eﬀect and the sommerfeld expansion , Physical Review D 98 (2018) 025012

2018
[53]

Loganayagam, Anomaly Induced Transport in Arbitrary Dimensions , 1106.0277

R. Loganayagam, Anomaly Induced Transport in Arbitrary Dimensions , 1106.0277

arXiv
[54]

Loganayagam and P

R. Loganayagam and P. Surowka, Anomaly/Transport in an Ideal Weyl gas , JHEP 04 (2012) 097, [ 1201.2812]

2012 arXiv
[55]

Loganayagam, Anomalies and the Helicity of the Thermal State , JHEP 11 (2013) 205, [1211.3850]

R. Loganayagam, Anomalies and the Helicity of the Thermal State , JHEP 11 (2013) 205, [1211.3850]

2013 arXiv
[56]

Landsteiner, E

K. Landsteiner, E. Megias and F. Pena-Benitez, Gravitational Anomaly and Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 021601, [ 1103.5006]

2011 arXiv
[57]

L´ evy-Leblond,Nonrelativistic particles and wave equations , Communications in Mathematical Physics 6 (1967) 286–311

J.-M. L´ evy-Leblond,Nonrelativistic particles and wave equations , Communications in Mathematical Physics 6 (1967) 286–311

1967
[58]

Ciambelli, C

L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos and K. Siampos, Flat holography and carrollian ﬂuids , Journal of High Energy Physics 2018 (2018) 165. – 37 –

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Copetti and K

C. Copetti and K. Landsteiner, Anomalous hall viscosity at the weyl semimetal/insulator transition, arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11403 (2019)

arXiv 2019

[2] [2]

Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions , Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials (2007)

S. Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions , Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials (2007)

work page 2007

[3] [3]

N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (Jan, 2018) 015001

work page 2018

[4] [4]

Landsteiner, Y

K. Landsteiner, Y. Liu and Y.-W. Sun, Odd viscosity in the quantum critical region of a holographic Weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 081604, [ 1604.01346]

arXiv 2016

[5] [5]

J. M. Link, B. N. Narozhny and J. Schmalian, Out-of-bounds hydrodynamics in anisotropic Dirac ﬂuids, 1708.02759

arXiv

[6] [6]

Berry curvature and Hall viscosities in an anisotropic Dirac semi-metal

F. Pena-Benitez, K. Saha and P. Surowka, Berry curvature and Hall viscosities in an anisotropic Dirac semi-metal, 1805.09827

work page Pith review arXiv

[7] [7]

Viscoelastic response of quantum Hall fluids in a tilted field

B. Oﬀertaler and B. Bradlyn, Viscoelastic response of quantum Hall ﬂuids in a tilted ﬁeld , 1811.08443

work page Pith review arXiv

[8] [8]

Duval and P

C. Duval and P. A. Horvathy, Non-relativistic conformal symmetries and Newton-Cartan structures, J. Phys. A42 (2009) 465206, [ 0904.0531]

arXiv 2009