Statistical physics and mesoscopic modeling to interpret tethered particle motion experiments

Anna\"el Brunet; Manoel Manghi; Nicolas Destainville

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 105 references

Statistical physics and mesoscopic modeling to interpret tethered particle motion experiments

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A review argues that after correcting tethered-particle data for outliers, drift, and camera blurring, mesoscopic polymer models can recover DNA elastic parameters and looping and binding kinetics.

desk verdict A competent, honest review of TPM analysis tools by the people who built many of them; no new science, but a useful consolidation for experimentalists. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01429 v1 pith:C3H63W22 submitted 2019-09-03 physics.bio-ph cond-mat.soft

Manoel Manghi , Nicolas Destainville , Annaël Brunet This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.bio-phcond-mat.soft

keywords tetheredparticlemotionsingle-moleculebiophysicsDNAelasticitypersistencelengthworm-likechainblurringcorrectionhiddenMarkovmodelinverseproblem

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a review of the statistical-physics toolkit used to turn raw tethered particle motion (TPM) data—the jittering of a bead tethered to a surface by a DNA molecule—into quantitative statements about DNA. Its central thesis is that the pipeline works: once outlier trajectories are removed, instrumental drift is subtracted, and the finite camera exposure time is corrected with the inversion formulas in Eqs. (4) and (5), solving the inverse problem with worm-like-chain or coarse-grained models recovers DNA elastic parameters, local bends, salt- and temperature-dependent persistence length, and looping or binding kinetics. A sympathetic reader would care because TPM is inexpensive and versatile, and the review's claim is that the theory has matured enough to make it a quantitative single-molecule technique rather than a purely qualitative one. This is a methods review, not a report of a new experiment; its contribution is a recommended, validated protocol.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the position autocorrelation function $C(t) = \langle \mathbf{r}_{\parallel}(s+t)\cdot \mathbf{r}_{\parallel}(s)\rangle - \langle \mathbf{r}_{\parallel}\rangle^2$, assumed to have the single-exponential form $C(t)=C(0)e^{-t/\tau_m}$. This single-shape assumption is the pivot on which the drift correction (Eq. 3), the blurring correction (Eq. 4), and the amplitude correction (Eq. 5) all rest; the paper notes that the form is exact only for a quadratic confining potential and otherwise represents the slowest of many decaying modes. Around this pivot, the inverse problem is solved by worm-like-chain modelling, analytic formulas valid in the rigid and flexible limits, exact Monte Carlo sampling of polymer conformations, and Brownian dynamics or kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of the DNA–particle complex. The paper also identifies the minimal averaging window for two-state thresholding, $\tau/\lambda^2 < T_{\rm av} < \tau_{\rm LF}, \tau_{\rm LB}$, as a design rule for kinetics measurements.

What would settle it

Generate a simulated TPM trajectory from a worm-like chain with excluded volume at $L \simeq \ell_p$, compute the true autocorrelation, and test whether it is a single exponential; then apply Eqs. (4)–(5) to trajectories with $T_{\rm ex}/\tau = 0.1$ and $1.0$ and check that the recovered $\tau$ and $\sigma$ agree. An experimental version is to record the same DNA construct at several camera exposure times: if the corrected persistence length drifts with exposure time, the single-mode assumption is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the conclusion, is that once raw TPM data are cleaned of outliers, drift, and blurring, solving the inverse problem with mesoscopic polymer models and numerical simulation gives accurate access to DNA elastic parameters and to kinetics such as looping and binding rates. The review argues that the measured amplitude of movement $\sigma$ and correlation time $\tau_m$, after correction via $\tau \simeq \tau_m - T_{\rm ex}/3$ and $\sigma \simeq \sigma_m[2\tau/T_{\rm ex}-2(\tau/T_{\rm ex})^2(1-e^{-T_{\rm ex}/\tau})]^{-1/2}$, can be fed into worm-like-chain models—kinked variants for local bends, discrete worm-like chains with excluded volume for persistence length, and Brownian dynamics or Monte Carlo simulations for dynamics—to extract persistence length, bending angles, loop topology probabilities, and dwell times. The blurring correction is singled out as the most critical systematic effect, with the review even attributing erroneous temperature-denaturation conclusions in earlier work to its neglect. Throughout, the paper treats these corrections and models as a validated toolbox whose utility is demonstrated by consistency between simulation and experiment across many TPM studies.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's corrections all assume the bead's position autocorrelation is a single exponential, which is exact only for a quadratic confining potential; if the DNA tether's autocorrelation carries significant extra modes, the corrected $\sigma$ and $\tau$ carry a systematic bias into every downstream parameter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Applying Eqs. (4) and (5) removes the apparent shrinkage of tethered DNA at high temperature; the persistence length then follows the expected bending-modulus behavior up to about 60 °C.
With corrected amplitudes, the persistence length extracted from TPM varies with salt concentration and ion type across the full tested range, matching non-linear electrostatic theories that include finite-DNA-radius and ion-size effects.
A local bend of angle $\theta$ can be quantified through the kinked worm-like chain formula; for a 575 bp molecule a mid-molecule $\pi$ bend reduces the apparent contour length by about 30%.
Optimal thresholding requires the averaging window to lie between $\tau/\lambda^2$ and the dwell times; below this window false detections dominate, above it real transitions are missed.
Hidden Markov and Bayesian approaches recover looping and unlooping rates without thresholding, and can resolve states separated by 40 nm in amplitude at mean lifetimes near 0.5 s, where simple thresholding would need more than 4 s.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the single-exponential autocorrelation assumption carries appreciable weight in faster modes for stiff tethers, then Eqs. (4) and (5) would bias $\sigma$ and $\tau$ even after perfect data cleaning; a direct test is to vary the exposure time and check that corrected values are invariant.
The same blurring-correction logic should apply to any particle confined by a non-quadratic potential, such as membrane-protein tracking in small domains, but the single-mode assumption would need revalidation in each new geometry.
The review's 'quenched disorder' remark suggests a concrete modeling extension: representing sequence-dependent intrinsic curvature as a random field along the molecule and predicting a distribution of apparent contour lengths, which high-throughput TPM statistics could fit.
A measurable prediction of the toolbox is that corrected persistence length and looping rates should not depend on bead size or exposure time; systematic residual dependence would localize the error to the assumed polymer model or the autocorrelation form.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear Colleague,

You should know that this is a review, not a research paper. The authors are the group behind much of the primary literature on tethered particle motion analysis, and they have written a clear, well-organized summary of the statistical physics and mesoscopic models used to turn raw TPM traces into DNA parameters. The abstract says "reviewed" and the paper means it: all equations are from cited prior work, most of it their own. That is fine for a review, but it means you should not expect new results.

What the paper does well: it lays out the full pipeline—outlier filtering, drift subtraction, blurring correction, error bars, inverse problem solving with worm-like chain models, and two-state kinetics via thresholding or hidden Markov models. The blurring corrections (Eqs. 4 and 5) are derived from earlier work and the paper gives the validity condition τ_m ≥ 2Tex/3. It also gives a balanced account of the strengths and limits of HMM, including the quasi-equilibrium and 2D approximations, and it flags the absence of a systematic HMM benchmark. I found the section on temperature effects and DNA denaturation useful because it shows how failing to correct blurring led to erroneous conclusions.

Soft spots: The stress-test note flags a real limitation. The single-exponential autocorrelation assumption underlies Eqs. (3)-(5). The paper states the autocorrelation is a sum of exponentials and that τ_m is the slowest mode, but it does not quantify how internal modes with relaxation times comparable to the exposure time affect the corrected σ and τ. For semi-flexible tethers (L/ℓp between 2 and 14, which is the experimental regime they discuss), that could bias downstream inferences. The paper could have added a sentence or two acknowledging this and pointing to error estimates or range of validity. That is a minor omission for a review, not a fatal one. A second, minor point: the review's central claim of "good accuracy" in Section VI is stated without a global error budget; the reader should treat it as a qualitative statement.

Bottom line: If you are an experimentalist using TPM, or a theorist looking for a compact entry point to the literature, this is worth reading. It is not going to change how I think about anything, but it is a reliable, honest consolidation. I would send it to peer review for the venue it was written for. I would not cite it in my own work in the next year unless I needed a single reference for TPM data preprocessing.

Cheers, [Your name]

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review paper examines the theoretical and computational toolbox needed to interpret tethered particle motion (TPM) experiments. It covers experimental artefacts (outlier trajectories, instrumental drift, finite exposure time), presenting correction formulas (Eqs. (3)-(5)); equilibrium models of the tethered DNA-particle complex, including the worm-like chain and kinked worm-like chain (Eq. (9)); numerical approaches (Brownian dynamics and Monte Carlo); and methods for detecting conformational transitions (thresholding and hidden Markov models). The authors' central claim, stated in Section VI, is that after the recommended preprocessing and inverse-problem modeling, TPM provides accurate DNA elastic parameters and kinetic rates.

Significance. If the claimed accuracy is substantiated, the review will be a valuable methodological reference for experimental groups using TPM. The manuscript is clearly written, organizes a large literature, and gives concrete formulas with some validity conditions (e.g., Eq. (4) states tau_m >= 2 T_ex/3). A notable strength is that the review is candid about limitations of the discussed methods, including the approximations in hidden Markov models and unresolved sequence-dependent curvature issues. However, the central correction formulas inherit the single-exponential autocorrelation approximation, whose error for realistic semiflexible tethers is not quantified; this weakens the support for the accuracy claim.

major comments (2)

[Section III, Eqs. (3)-(5)] The drift and blurring corrections are derived under the assumption that the position autocorrelation function is a single exponential, C(t)=C(0)e^{-t/tau}. The text explicitly acknowledges that this is exact only for a quadratic confining potential and that for a polymer tether the autocorrelation is a sum of exponentials, with tau associated with the slowest mode. The formulas do not address the contribution of internal modes to the time-averaged variance sigma_m when their relaxation times are comparable to T_ex. For the semiflexible tethers described in Section IV.A (L/ell_p between 2 and 14), these modes need not be negligible. Since Eqs. (4) and (5) are presented as the recommended way to recover the true sigma and tau, the authors should quantify the resulting bias or state clearly the experimental conditions under which the single-exponential approximation is adequate. Without such a bound, the 'good accuracy' claimed in Section VI is not established.
[Section IV.A, Fig. 2] The review states that experimental and numerical relaxation times are in good agreement, but the inset of Fig. 2 shows the ratio tau_exp/tau_sim varying from 0.5 to 2, a factor of four spread. Because the numerical simulations are recommended for solving the inverse problem and for interpreting kinetics, the source of this scatter and its impact on the accuracy of inferred parameters, such as persistence length or looping rates, should be explicitly discussed rather than described only as 'good agreement'.

minor comments (4)

[Section III.C] The sentence 'Even though larger than Tex at low T, tau likely becomes comparable to or smaller than tau at high T' should end with 'smaller than Tex' rather than 'smaller than tau'.
[Author list] The name 'Anna¨el Brunet' displays a formatting error for the name 'Annaël'.
[Section IV.C.3] In the sentence 'a slower decrease of the apparent length of the dNA molecule was now observed', 'dNA' should be 'DNA'.
[Section V.B] In 'Once an experimental time series (q(t), r_parallel(t))_t has been recorder', 'recorder' should be 'recorded'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the review compiles existing correction formulas and forward-model comparisons; self-citations are normal attribution, not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a review article, not an original derivation, and its central claims do not reduce to their own inputs. The preprocessing formulas (Eqs. 3-5) are explicitly presented as corrections taken from earlier work (Refs. [17,42]) under a stated single-exponential autocorrelation assumption; they are not fitted to the data and then renamed as predictions. The inverse-problem examples compare independently measured TPM amplitudes to forward worm-like-chain simulations (or to analytically known limits) in order to infer persistence length, bending angles, or kinetic rates, and the paper's own text acknowledges the multi-exponential caveat in Section III as an approximation. Self-citations (Refs. [17,19,22,42]) exist, but they point to prior derivations and experimental benchmarks that are external to the review and are not invoked as an unverified uniqueness constraint. The single-exponential assumption is a robustness/accuracy concern, not a circularity: if it fails, corrected values would be biased, but the derivation does not assume the conclusion it is used to establish. No specific reduction of a claimed result to its own definition or to a fitted input is exhibited in the text.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are introduced by this review; the fitted values reported in Appendix A (kappa = 1.5 kBT and a = 0.20 nm for ssDNA, and the Ising model parameters for dsDNA) are reproduced from Ref [27] and are illustrative, not load-bearing for the review's central claim. The axioms listed are the background modeling assumptions that the review itself invokes or flags.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The worm-like chain (Kratky-Porod) model captures the equilibrium mechanical behavior of dsDNA at the 400-2080 bp contour lengths used in TPM.
Invoked in Sections II and IV as the basis for relating bead amplitude sigma to DNA persistence length, local bends, and loops.
domain assumption The measured 2D position autocorrelation function can be approximated as a single exponential, C(t) = C(0)e^{-t/tau}.
Introduced before Eq. (3); the paper explicitly notes this is exact only for a quadratic confining potential. It underlies the drift and blurring corrections in Eqs. (3)-(5).
domain assumption The DNA-bead complex is in quasi-equilibrium within each state, so equilibrium distributions of amplitude can be used to infer transition kinetics.
Discussed in Section V B; the review states this is valid only if the free-energy wells are sufficiently deep, which limits both thresholding and HMM approaches.
domain assumption In the diffusive HMM treatment of looping, the bead height z above the surface can be ignored and motion treated as 2D diffusion.
Section V B, quoting Beausang and Nelson [85]. The review itself flags that z can be large when the 2D excursion is small, so looping competence may be misclassified.
domain assumption The blurring correction formulas remain valid only in the regime tau_m >= 2 T_ex/3.
Stated in Section III C as the validity condition for Eq. (4); outside this regime the approximations break down.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Statistical physics and mesoscopic modeling to interpret tethered particle motion experiments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C3H63W22

@misc{pith2026190901429,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Statistical physics and mesoscopic modeling to interpret tethered particle motion experiments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C3H63W22}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01429}
}

read the original abstract

Tethered particle motion experiments are versatile single-molecule techniques enabling one to address in vitro the molecular properties of DNA and its interactions with various partners involved in genetic regulations. These techniques provide raw data such as the tracked particle amplitude of movement, from which relevant information about DNA conformations or states must be recovered. Solving this inverse problem appeals to specific theoretical tools that have been designed in the two last decades, together with the data pre-processing procedures that ought to be implemented to avoid biases inherent to these experimental techniques. These statistical tools and models are reviewed in this paper.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01429 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Thresholding: The plots of the variance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

[1]

Schafer, J

D.A. Schafer, J. Gelles, M.P. Sheetz, R. Landick, Transcription by single molecules of RNA polymerase observed by light microscopy, Nature (1991) 352, 444-448. 16

1991
[2]

H. Yin, R. Landick, J. Gelles, Tethered particle motion method for studying transcript elongation by a single RNA polymerase molecule. Biophys. J. (1994) 67, 2468-2478

1994
[3]

Finzi, J

L. Finzi, J. Gelles, Measurement of lactose repressor-mediated loop formation and breakdown in single DNA molecules. Science (1995) 267, 378-380

1995
[4]

Zocchi, Analytical assays based on detecting conformational changes of single molecules, ChemPhysChem (2006) 7, 555-560

G. Zocchi, Analytical assays based on detecting conformational changes of single molecules, ChemPhysChem (2006) 7, 555-560

2006
[5]

Fan, C.H

H.F. Fan, C.H. Ma, M. Jayaram, Single-molecule tethered particle motion: stepwise analyses of site-speciﬁc DNA recom- bination, Micromachines (2018) 9, 216

2018
[6]

Pinkney, P

J.N.M. Pinkney, P. Zawadzki, J. Mazuryk, L.K. Arciszewska, D.J. Sherratt, A.N. Kapanidis, Capturing reaction paths and intermediates in Cre-loxP recombination using single-molecule ﬂuorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2012) 109, 20871-20876

2012
[7]

May, J.N.M

P.F.J. May, J.N.M. Pinkney, P. Zawadzki, G.W. Evans, D.J. Sherratt, A.N. Kapanidis, Tethered ﬂuorophore motion: studying large DNA conformational changes by single-ﬂuorophore imaging, Biophys. J. (2014) 107, 1205-1216 ; Biophys. J. (2015) 109, 457

2014
[8]

Schickinger, M

M. Schickinger, M. Zacharias, H. Dietz, Tethered multiﬂuorophore motion reveals equilibrium transition kinetics of single DNA double helices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sc. U.S.A. (2018) 115, E7512-E7521

2018

Show all 105 references

[9]

Bustamante, Z

C. Bustamante, Z. Bryant, S.B. Smith, Ten years of tension: single-molecule DNA mechanics, Nature (2003) 421, 423-427

2003
[10]

Neuman, A

K.C. Neuman, A. Nagy, Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force mi- croscopy, Nature Methods (2008) 5, 491-505

2008
[11]

Smith, Y

S.B. Smith, Y. Cui, C. Bustamante, Overstretching B-DNA: the elastic response of individual double-stranded and single-stranded DNA molecules, Science (1996) 271, 795-799

1996
[12]

M.D. Wang, H. Yin, R. Landick, J. Gelles, S.M. Block, Stretching DNA with optical tweezers, Biophys. J. (1997) 72, 1335-1346

1997
[13]

Smith, L

S.B. Smith, L. Finzi, C. Bustamante, Direct mechanical measurement of the elasticity of single DNA molecules by using magnetic beads, Science (1992) 258, 1122-1126

1992
[14]

Gosse, V

C. Gosse, V. Croquette, Magnetic tweezers: micromanipulation and force measurement at the molecular level, Biophys J.(2002) 82, 3314-3329

2002
[15]

Marko, E.D

J.F. Marko, E.D. Siggia, Bending and twisting elasticity of DNA, Macromolecules (1994) 27, 981-988

1994
[16]

Segall, P.C

D.E. Segall, P.C. Nelson, R. Phillips, Volume-exclusion eﬀects in tethered-particle experiments: bead size matters. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2006) 96, 088306

2006
[17]

Manghi, C

M. Manghi, C. Tardin, J. Baglio, P. Rousseau, L. Salom´ e, N. Destainville, Probing DNA conformational changes with high temporal resolution by Tethered Particle Motion, Phys. Biol. (2010) 7, 046003

2010
[18]

Pl´ enat, C

T. Pl´ enat, C. Tardin, P. Rousseau, L. Salom´ e, High-throughput single-molecule analysis of DNA-protein interactions by tethered particle motion, Nucleic Acids Res. (2012) 40, e89

2012
[19]

Brunet, C

A. Brunet, C. Tardin, L. Salom´ e, P. Rousseau, N. Destainville, M. Manghi, Dependence of DNA persistence length on ionic strength of solutions with monovalent and divalent salts: A joint theory-experiment study. Macromolecules (2015) 48, 3641-3652

2015
[20]

Brunet, S

A. Brunet, S. Chevalier, N. Destainville, M. Manghi, P. Rousseau, M. Salhi, L. Salom´ e, C. Tardin, Probing a label-free local bend in DNA by single molecule tethered particle motion, Nucleic Acids Res. (2015) 43, e72

2015
[21]

Fournes, E

F. Fournes, E. Crozat, C. Pages, C. Tardin, L. Salom´ e, F. Cornet, P. Rousseau, FtsK translocation permits discrimination between an endogenous and an imported Xer/dif recombination complex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2016) 113, 7882- 7887

2016
[22]

Brunet, L

A. Brunet, L. Salom´ e, P. Rousseau, N. Destainville, M. Manghi, C. Tardin, How does temperature impact the conformation of single DNA molecules below melting temperature?, Nucleic Acids Res. (2018) 46, 2074-2081

2018
[23]

Allemand, C

J.-F. Allemand, C. Tardin, L. Salom´ e, Parallelized DNA tethered bead measurements to scrutinize DNA mechanical structure, Methods (2019), this issue

2019
[24]

Dennis, A

C. Dennis, A. Fedorov, E. K¨ as, L. Salom´ e, M. Grigoriev, RuvAB-directed branch migration of individual Holliday junctions is impeded by sequence heterology, EMBO J. (2004) 23, 2413-2422

2004
[25]

Tardin, The mechanics of DNA loops bridged by proteins unveiled by single-molecule experiments, Biochimie (2017) 142, 80-92

C. Tardin, The mechanics of DNA loops bridged by proteins unveiled by single-molecule experiments, Biochimie (2017) 142, 80-92

2017
[26]

Vilfan, J

I.D. Vilfan, J. Lipfert, D.A. Koster, S.G. Lemay, N.H. Dekker, Magnetic tweezers for single-molecule experiments. In Handbook of Single-Molecule Biophysics (pp. 371-395). Springer, New York, 2009

2009
[27]

Manghi, N

M. Manghi, N. Destainville, J. Palmeri, Mesoscopic models for DNA stretching under force: new results and comparison with experiments, Eur. Phys. J. E (2012) 35, 110

2012
[28]

Heller, T.P

I. Heller, T.P. Hoekstra, G.A. King, E.J.G. Peterman, G.J.L. Wuite, Optical tweezers analysis of DNA-protein complexes, Chem. Rev. (2014) 114, 3087-3119

2014
[29]

Truex, Hoi Sung Chung, John M

K. Truex, Hoi Sung Chung, John M. Louis, and William A. Eaton, Testing landscape theory for biomolecular processes with single molecule ﬂuorescence spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2015) 115, 018101

2015
[30]

Dulin, T

D. Dulin, T. J. Cui, J. Cnossen, M.W. Docter, J. Lipfert, N.H. Dekker, High spatiotemporal-resolution magnetic tweezers: calibration and applications for DNA dynamics, Biophys. J. (2015) 109, 2113-2125

2015
[31]

Sarkar, V.V

R. Sarkar, V.V. Rybenkov, A guide to magnetic tweezers and their applications, Front. Phys. (2016) 4,48

2016
[32]

Probing single helicase dynamics on long nucleic acids through ﬂuorescence-force measurement

Lin CT., Ha T. Probing single helicase dynamics on long nucleic acids through ﬂuorescence-force measurement. In Gen- nerich A. (eds) Optical tweezers. Methods in Molecular Biology vol. 1486. Humana Press, New York, 2017

2017
[33]

Kriegel, N

F. Kriegel, N. Ermann, J. Lipfert, Probing the mechanical properties, conformational changes, and interactions of nucleic 17 acids with magnetic tweezers, J. Struct. Biol. (2017) 197, 26-36

2017
[34]

de Gennes, Scaling concepts in polymer physics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1979

P.G. de Gennes, Scaling concepts in polymer physics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1979

1979
[35]

Doi, S.F

M. Doi, S.F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics, Oxford University Press, Oxford,1986

1986
[36]

Lindner, G

M. Lindner, G. Nir, S. Medalion, H.R.C. Dietrich, Y. Rabin, Y. Garini, Force-free measurements of the conformations of DNA molecules tethered to a wall, Phys. Rev. E. (2011) 83, 011916

2011
[37]

Nelson, C

P.C. Nelson, C. Zurla,D. Brogioli,J.F. Beausang, L. Finzi, D.D. Dunlap, Tethered particle motion as a diagnostic of DNA tether length, J. Phys. Chem. B (2006) 110, 17260-17267

2006
[38]

Kumar, C

S. Kumar, C. Manzo, C. Zurla, S. Ucuncuoglu, L. Finzi, D. Dunlap, Enhanced tethered-particle motion analysis reveals viscous eﬀects, Biophys. J. (2014) 106, 399-409

2014
[39]

T. Ando, T. Uchihashi, N. Kodera, High-speed AFM and applications to biomolecular systems, Annual review of bio- physics (2013) 42, 393-414

2013
[40]

Gietl, D

A. Gietl, D. Grohmann, Modern biophysical approaches probe transcription-factor-induced DNA bending and looping, Biochem. Soc. Trans. (2013) 41, 368-373

2013
[41]

Johnson, J.W

S. Johnson, J.W. van de Meent, R. Phillips, C.H. Wiggins, M. Lind´ en, Multiple LacI-mediated loops revealed by Bayesian statistics and tethered particle motion, Nucleic Acids Res. (2014) 42, 10265-10277

2014
[42]

Destainville, L

N. Destainville, L. Salom´ e, Quantiﬁcation and correction of systematic errors due to detector time-averaging in single molecule tracking experiments, Biophys. J. (2006) 90, L17-L19

2006
[43]

Towles, J.F

K.B. Towles, J.F. Beausang, H.G. Garcia, R. Phillips, P.C. Nelson, First-principles calculation of DNA looping in tethered particle experiments, Phys. Biol. (2009) 6, 025001

2009
[44]

Bickel, A note on conﬁned diﬀusion, Physica A (2007) 377, 24-32

T. Bickel, A note on conﬁned diﬀusion, Physica A (2007) 377, 24-32

2007
[45]

Driessen, G

R.P.C. Driessen, G. Sitters, N. Laurens, G.F. Moolenaar, G.J.L. Wuite, N. Goosen, R.T. Dame, Eﬀect of temperature on the intrinsic ﬂexibility of DNA and its interaction with architectural protein, Biochemistry (2014) 53, 6430-6438

2014
[46]

Imparato, F

A. Imparato, F. Sbrana, M. Vassalli, Reconstructing the free-energy landscape of a polyprotein by single-molecule exper- iments, EPL (2008) 5, 58006

2008
[47]

Loong, H.-X

C.K.P. Loong, H.-X. Zhou, P.B. Chase, Persistence length of human cardiac α-tropomyosin measured by single molecule direct probe microscopy, PloSOne (2012) 6, e39676

2012
[48]

Tapia-Rojo, C

R. Tapia-Rojo, C. Marcuello, A. Lostao, C. G´ omez-Moreno, J. J. Mazo, F. Falo, A physical picture for mechanical dissociation of biological complexes: from forces to free energies, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. (2017) 6, 4567-4575

2017
[49]

S. LB. K¨ enig, M. Hadzic, E. Fiorini, R. B¨ orner, D. Kowerko, W. U. Blanckenhorn, R. K. Sigel, BOBA FRET: Bootstrap- based analysis of single-molecule FRET data, PloS One (2013) 12, e84157

2013
[50]

Samuel, S

J. Samuel, S. Sinha, Elasticity of semiﬂexible polymers, Phys. Rev. E (2002) 66, 050801(R)

2002
[51]

Stepanow, and G

S. Stepanow, and G. Schutz, The distribution function of a semiﬂexible polymer and random walks with constraints, EPL-Europhys. Lett. (2002) 60, 546-551

2002
[52]

Qian, A mathematical analysis for Brownian dynamics of a DNA tether, J

H. Qian, A mathematical analysis for Brownian dynamics of a DNA tether, J. Math. Biol. (2000) 41, 331-340

2000
[53]

Pouget, C

N. Pouget, C. Turlan, N. Destainville, L. Salom´ e, M. Chandler, IS911 transpososome assembly as analysed by tethered particle motion, Nucleic Acids Res. (2006) 34, 4313

2006
[54]

Tolic-Norrelykke, M.B

S.F. Tolic-Norrelykke, M.B. Rasmussen, F.S. Pavone, K. Berg-Sorensen, L.B. Oddershede, Stepwise bending of DNA by a single TATA-box binding protein, Biophys. J. (2006) 90, 3694-3703

2006
[55]

Y. Y. Biton, S. Kumar, D. Dunlap, D. Swigon, Lac repressor mediated DNA looping: Monte Carlo simulation of con- strained DNA molecules complemented with current experimental results, PloS One (2014), 9, e92475

2014
[56]

Newby Lambert, E

M. Newby Lambert, E. V¨ ocker, S. Blumberg, S. Redemann, A. Gajraj, J.C. Meiners, N.G. Walter, Mg 2+-induced com- paction of single RNA molecules monitored by tethered particle microscopy, Biophys. J. (2006) 90, 3672-3685

2006
[57]

Guilbaud, L

S. Guilbaud, L. Salom´ e, N. Destainville, M. Manghi, C. Tardin, Dependence of DNA persistence length on ionic strength and ion type, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2019) 122, 028102

2019
[58]

Odijk, Polyelectrolytes near the rod limit, J

T. Odijk, Polyelectrolytes near the rod limit, J. Polym. Sci. (1977) 15, 477

1977
[59]

Skolnick, M

J. Skolnick, M. Fixman, Electrostatic persistence length of a wormlike polyelectrolyte, Macromolecules (1977) 10, 944

1977
[60]

G. S. Manning, A procedure for extracting persistence lengths from light-scattering data on intermediate molecular weight DNA, Biopolymers (1981) 20, 1751

1981
[61]

Manning, The contribution of transient counterion imbalances to DNA bending ﬂuctuations, Biophys

G.S. Manning, The contribution of transient counterion imbalances to DNA bending ﬂuctuations, Biophys. J. (2006) 90, 3208

2006
[62]

R.R. Netz, H. Orland, Variational charge renormalization in charged systems, Eur. Phys. J. E (2003) 11, 301-311

2003
[63]

Trizac, T

E. Trizac, T. Shen, Bending stiﬀ charged polymers: The electrostatic persistence length, EPL-Europhys. Lett. (2016) 116, 18007

2016
[64]

Kriegel, N

F. Kriegel, N. Ermann, R. Forbes, D. Dulin, N.H. Dekker, J. Lipfert, Probing the salt dependence of the torsional stiﬀness of DNA by multiplexed magnetic torque tweezers, Nucleic Acids Res. (2017) 45, 5920-5929

2017
[65]

Nomidis, F

S.K. Nomidis, F. Kriegel, W. Vanderlinden, J. Lipfert, E. Carlon, Twist-bend coupling and the torsional response of double-stranded DNA, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2017) 118, 217801

2017
[66]

Manghi, J

M. Manghi, J. Palmeri, N. Destainville, Coupling between denaturation and chain conformations in DNA: stretching, bending, torsion and ﬁnite size eﬀects, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter (2009) 21, 034104

2009
[67]

Kriegel, C

F. Kriegel, C. Matek, T. Drsata, K. Kulenkampﬀ, S. Tschirpke, M. Zacharias, F. Lankas, J. Lipfert, The temperature dependence of the helical twist of DNA, Nucleic Acids Res. (2018) 46, 7998-8009

2018
[68]

Cluzel, A

P. Cluzel, A. Lebrun, C. Heller, R. Lavery, J.-L. Viovy, D. Chatenay, F. Caron, DNA: an extensible molecule, Science (1996) 271, 792-794

1996
[69]

Zhang, H

X. Zhang, H. Chen, S. Le, I. Rouzina, P.S. Doyle, J. Yan, Revealing the competition between peeled ssDNA, melting 18 bubbles, and S-DNA during DNA overstretching by single-molecule calorimetry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2013) 110, 3865-3870

2013
[70]

Zhang, H

X. Zhang, H. Chen, H. Fu, P.S. Doyle, J. Yan, Two distinct overstretched DNA structures revealed by single-molecule thermodynamics measurements, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2012) 109, 8103-8108

2012
[71]

Zhang, Y

X. Zhang, Y. Qu, H. Chen, I. Rouzina, S. Zhang, P.S. Doyle, J. Yan, Interconversion between Three Overstretched DNA Structures, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2014) 136, 16073-16080

2014
[72]

H. Fu, H. Chen, X. Zhang, Y. Qu, J.F. Marko, J. Yan, Transition dynamics and selection of the distinct S-DNA and strand unpeeling modes of double helix overstretching, Nucleic Acids Res. (2011) 39, 3473-3481

2011
[73]

Bosaeus, A.H

N. Bosaeus, A.H. El-Sagheer, T. Brown, S.B. Smith, B. Akerman, C. Bustamante, B. Nord´ en, Tension induces a base- paired overstretched DNA conformation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2012) 109, 15179-15184

2012
[74]

H¨ ugel, M

T. H¨ ugel, M. Rief, M. Seitz, H.E. Gaub, R.R. Netz, Highly Stretched Single Polymers: Atomic-Force-Microscope Exper- iments Versus Ab-Initio Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2005) 94, 048301

2005
[75]

M. Rief, H. Clausen-Schaumann, H.E. Gaub, Sequence-dependent mechanics of single DNA molecules, Nat. Struct. Biol. (1999) 6, 346-349

1999
[76]

Romano, D

F. Romano, D. Chakraborty, J.P.K. Doye, T.E. Ouldridge, A.A. Louis, Coarse-grained simulations of DNA overstretching, J. Chem. Phys. (2013) 138, 085101

2013
[77]

Vanzi, C

F. Vanzi, C. Broggio, L. Sacconi, F.S. Pavone, Lac repressor hinge ﬂexibility and DNA looping: Single molecule kinetics by tethered particle motion, Nucleic Acids Res. (2006) 34, 3409-3420

2006
[78]

Diagne, M

C.T. Diagne, M. Salhi, E. Crozat, L. Salom´ e, F. Cornet, P. Rousseau, C. Tardin, TPM analyses reveal that FtsK contributes both to the assembly and the activation of the XerCD-dif recombination synapse, Nucleic Acids Res. (2014) 42, 1721-1732

2014
[79]

Fan, Z.N

H.F. Fan, Z.N. Liu, S.Y. Chow, Y.H. Lu, H. Li, Histone chaperone-mediated nucleosome assembly process, PLoS One (2015) 10, e0115007

2015
[80]

Merkus, M.W.J

K.E. Merkus, M.W.J. Prins, C. Storm, Single-bond association kinetics determined by tethered particle motion: concept and simulations, Biophys. J. (2016) 111, 1612-1620

2016
[81]

Dixit, M

S. Dixit, M. Singh-Zocchi, J. Hanne, G. Zocchi, Mechanics of binding of a single integration-host-factor protein to DNA, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2005) 94, 118101

2005
[82]

Laurens, S.R.W

N. Laurens, S.R.W. Bellamy, A.F. Harms, Y.S. Kovacheva, S.E. Halford, G.J.L. Wuite, Dissecting protein-induced DNA looping dynamics in real time, Nucleic Acids Res. (2009) 37, 5454-5464

2009
[83]

Vanzi, L

F. Vanzi, L. Sacconi, F.S. Pavone, Analysis of kinetics in noisy systems: application to single molecule tethered particle motion, Biophys. J. (2007) 97, 21-36

2007
[84]

Colquhoun, F.J

D. Colquhoun, F.J. Sigworth, Fitting and statistical analysis of single-channel records, in: B. Sakmann, E. Neher (Eds.), Single-Channel Recording, Plenum Press, New York, 1983, pp. 191-263

1983
[85]

Beausang, P.C

J.F. Beausang, P.C. Nelson, Diﬀusive hidden Markov chain model characterization of DNA looping dynamics in tethered particle motion, Phys. Biol. (2007) 4, 205-219

2007
[86]

L.E. Baum, T. Petrie, Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of ﬁnite state Markov chains, The Annals of Math- ematical Statistics (1966) 37 1554-1563

1966
[87]

Beausang, C

J.F. Beausang, C. Zurla, C. Manzo, D. Dunlap, L. Finzi, P.C. Nelson, DNA looping kinetics analyzed using diﬀusive hidden Markov model, Biophys. J. (2007) L64-L66

2007
[88]

Grimmett, D

G. Grimmett, D. Stirzaker, Probability and random processes, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982

1982
[89]

Evans, K

E.A. Evans, K. Ritchie, Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bond, Biophys. J. (1997) 72, 1541-1555

1997
[90]

Kruithof, J

M. Kruithof, J. van Noort, Hidden Markov analysis of nucleosome unwrapping under force, Biophys. J. (2009) 96, 3708- 3715

2009
[91]

Manghi, N

M. Manghi, N. Destainville, Physics of base-pairing dynamics in DNA, Physics Reports (2016) 631, 1-41

2016
[92]

H. You, S. Guo, S. Le, Q. Tang, M. Yao, X. Zhao, J. Yan, Two-state folding energy determination based on transition points in nonequilibrium single-molecule experiments, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. (2018) 9, 811-816

2018
[93]

Zuiddam, R

M. Zuiddam, R. Everaers, H. Schiessel, Physics behind the mechanical nucleosome positioning code, Phys. Rev. E. (2017) 96, 52412

2017
[94]

Geggier, A

S. Geggier, A. Vologodskii, Sequence dependence of DNA bending rigidity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2010) 107, 15421-15426

2010
[95]

Marko, E.D

J.F. Marko, E.D. Siggia, Stretching DNA, Macromolecules (1995) 28, 8759-8770

1995
[96]

Bustamante, S.B

C. Bustamante, S.B. Smith, J. Liphardt, D. Smith, Single-molecule studies of DNA mechanics, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. (2000) 10, 279-285

2000
[97]

Ray, J.R

C. Ray, J.R. Brown, B.B. Akhremitchev, Correction of systematic errors in single-molecule force spectroscopy with polymeric tethers by atomic force microscopy, Phys. Chem. B (2007) 111, 1963-1974

2007
[98]

Kierfeld, O

J. Kierfeld, O. Niamploy, V. Sa-yakanit, R. Lipowsky, Stretching of semiﬂexible polymers with elastic bonds, Eur. Phys. J. E (2004) 14, 17-34

2004
[99]

Hanke, A

F. Hanke, A. Serr, H.J. Kreuzer, R.R. Netz, Stretching single polypeptides: The eﬀect of rotational constraints in the backbone EPL-Europhys. Lett. (2010) 92, 53001

2010
[100]

H. Fu, H. Chen, J.F. Marko, J. Yan, Two distinct overstretched DNA states, Nucleic Acids Res. (2010) 38, 5594-5600

2010
[101]

Storm, P.C

C. Storm, P.C. Nelson, The bend stiﬀness of S-DNA, EPL-Europhys. Lett. (2003) 62, 760-766

2003
[102]

Palmeri, M

J. Palmeri, M. Manghi, N. Destainville, Thermal denaturation of ﬂuctuating DNA driven by bending entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2007) 99, 088103

2007
[103]

Palmeri, M

J. Palmeri, M. Manghi, N. Destainville, Thermal denaturation of ﬂuctuating ﬁnite DNA chains: The role of bending 19 rigidity in bubble nucleation, Phys. Rev. E (2008) 77, 011913

2008
[104]

Principal abbreviations used in this work: TPM: tethered particle motion; htTPM: high-throughput TPM; MTT: magnetic torque tweezers; AFM: atomic force microscopy; HMM: hidden Markov model
[105]

When dealing with experiments, it will become an average over time, assuming the validity of the ergodic theorem

The average ⟨...⟩ is an ensemble average over realizations. When dealing with experiments, it will become an average over time, assuming the validity of the ergodic theorem

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Schafer, J

D.A. Schafer, J. Gelles, M.P. Sheetz, R. Landick, Transcription by single molecules of RNA polymerase observed by light microscopy, Nature (1991) 352, 444-448. 16

1991

[2] [2]

H. Yin, R. Landick, J. Gelles, Tethered particle motion method for studying transcript elongation by a single RNA polymerase molecule. Biophys. J. (1994) 67, 2468-2478

1994

[3] [3]

Finzi, J

L. Finzi, J. Gelles, Measurement of lactose repressor-mediated loop formation and breakdown in single DNA molecules. Science (1995) 267, 378-380

1995

[4] [4]

Zocchi, Analytical assays based on detecting conformational changes of single molecules, ChemPhysChem (2006) 7, 555-560

G. Zocchi, Analytical assays based on detecting conformational changes of single molecules, ChemPhysChem (2006) 7, 555-560

2006

[5] [5]

Fan, C.H

H.F. Fan, C.H. Ma, M. Jayaram, Single-molecule tethered particle motion: stepwise analyses of site-speciﬁc DNA recom- bination, Micromachines (2018) 9, 216

2018

[6] [6]

Pinkney, P

J.N.M. Pinkney, P. Zawadzki, J. Mazuryk, L.K. Arciszewska, D.J. Sherratt, A.N. Kapanidis, Capturing reaction paths and intermediates in Cre-loxP recombination using single-molecule ﬂuorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2012) 109, 20871-20876

2012

[7] [7]

May, J.N.M

P.F.J. May, J.N.M. Pinkney, P. Zawadzki, G.W. Evans, D.J. Sherratt, A.N. Kapanidis, Tethered ﬂuorophore motion: studying large DNA conformational changes by single-ﬂuorophore imaging, Biophys. J. (2014) 107, 1205-1216 ; Biophys. J. (2015) 109, 457

2014

[8] [8]

Schickinger, M

M. Schickinger, M. Zacharias, H. Dietz, Tethered multiﬂuorophore motion reveals equilibrium transition kinetics of single DNA double helices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sc. U.S.A. (2018) 115, E7512-E7521

2018