Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 132 references

Conservation of energy-momentum of matter as the basis for the gauge theory of gravitation

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A gauge theory of gravity based on the conserved energy-momentum current leads to teleparallel gravity equivalent to general relativity.

desk verdict A solid senior-authored review of translational and Poincaré gauge gravity with no new results, accurate formalism, and one minor presentation overreach in the abstract's claim about equivalence to GR. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01791 v3 pith:VZ75N5HK submitted 2019-09-01 gr-qc hep-th

Friedrich W. Hehl , Yuri N. Obukhov This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th PACS 04.20.Cv11.15.-q
keywords gaugetheoryofgravityenergy-momentumconservationtranslationalteleparallelismWeitzenböckgeometryPoincaréEinstein-Cartantorsion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that gravity can be derived by the same gauge recipe that produces the Yang-Mills forces, provided the conserved current is chosen correctly. The correct current for gravity is the energy-momentum of matter, whose rigid symmetry is the four-parameter translation group of Minkowski space. Making translations local forces the introduction of a gauge potential, the coframe, whose curl is torsion and which deforms Minkowski space into a Weitzenböck space of distant parallelism. With a specific quadratic torsion Lagrangian and a symmetric energy-momentum tensor, this teleparallel theory is equivalent to general relativity; extending the gauging to the full Poincaré group then yields Einstein-Cartan theory, in which spin sources torsion. The paper's point is that conservation of energy-momentum, rather than mass, is the foundation on which a gauge theory of gravitation can be built.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the coframe, the set of four 1-forms that serve as the translational gauge potential, with torsion defined as its covariant curl. The argument works through the standard Noether mechanism: a conserved current implies a rigid symmetry, and promoting that symmetry to a local one requires a compensating gauge field whose field strength measures the failure of parallel transport to close. In the translational case the field strength is torsion, the curvature vanishes, and the geometry is a Weitzenböck space of teleparallelism. The same mechanism is then reapplied to the full Poincaré group, where the Lorentz connection joins the coframe as a second potential, torsion and curvature become the two field strengths, and the Riemann-Cartan spacetime emerges as the geometric arena; the constitutive relation between field strength and excitation is where the metric enters and where the specific theory is selected.

What would settle it

Take the teleparallel field equations with the special quadratic torsion Lagrangian and a matter source whose energy-momentum tensor is symmetric, such as a perfect fluid, then solve for a compact object; if any such solution has a metric different from the corresponding general-relativistic solution, or a torsion that cannot be removed by a choice of frame, the claimed equivalence with general relativity would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a gauge theory of gravitation is constructed by taking the conserved energy-momentum current of matter as the Noether source and demanding that the underlying rigid translation invariance of special relativity hold locally. The translational gauge potential is the coframe, and its field strength is torsion; the resulting spacetime has vanishing curvature but nonvanishing torsion, a Weitzenböck geometry also known as teleparallelism. The paper asserts, citing earlier work, that this teleparallel formalism is equivalent to general relativity in the sense that a suitable Lagrangian quadratic in torsion, together with a symmetric energy-momentum tensor, reproduces Einstein's field equations. Once the full Poincaré group is gauged, the Lorentz connection becomes a second potential, curvature is revived, and the geometry is Riemann-Cartan; the Einstein-Cartan theory is the special case with a Hilbert-Einstein type Lagrangian, and it reduces to general relativity when matter has no spin.

Load-bearing premise

The equivalence of teleparallelism with general relativity is claimed only for a specially chosen quadratic torsion Lagrangian and only when the matter energy-momentum tensor is symmetric; the paper cites this condition from earlier lectures rather than re-deriving it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • General relativity can be recast as the theory of a local translation symmetry, with the coframe as the gravitational potential and torsion as its field strength.
  • The energy-momentum current, not mass density, is the fundamental source of gravity in this gauge-theoretic formulation.
  • Gauging the full Poincaré group turns spin into a gravitational source, coupling spin density to torsion; in the absence of spin, Einstein-Cartan theory and its parity-odd variant both reduce to general relativity.
  • In the teleparallel formulation the metric is needed only for the constitutive relation between the field strength and the excitation, so the kinematical structure of gravity can be described without a metric.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the equivalence result suggests that the special quadratic torsion Lagrangian is not a free choice but is selected by the requirement that the energy-momentum tensor be symmetric, giving a consistency criterion for gravitational Lagrangians.
  • Editorial inference: if the gauge argument is correct, a future measurement of spin-torsion coupling would be evidence that nature realizes the Poincaré gauge extension rather than pure Einstein gravity.
  • Editorial inference: the same conserved-current-plus-local-symmetry recipe applied to the de Sitter or anti-de Sitter group would generate alternative gravitational theories whose low-energy limit would have to contain teleparallelism or general relativity, providing a testable family of extensions.
  • Editorial inference: the shift from a point-particle description to a quantum-spinor description of test matter suggests that high-precision matter-wave interferometry could probe the equivalence principle at scales where spin and rotational acceleration matter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a review and position statement on the gauge-theoretic approach to gravity. It argues that, following Yang-Mills, a gauge theory is built from a conserved current and an associated rigid symmetry, and that for gravity the relevant current is the energy-momentum current with the translation group of Minkowski space as the rigid symmetry. Localizing translations introduces the coframe as a gauge potential and torsion as its field strength, leading to a Weitzenböck spacetime with teleparallelism. The paper states that for a suitable quadratic torsion Lagrangian and a symmetric energy-momentum tensor this translational gauge theory is equivalent to general relativity, citing reference [38]. It then reviews the extension to full Poincaré gauge gravity: kinematics, Noether identities, matter currents, the field equations, Einstein-Cartan theory, quadratic Poincaré gauge models, and Tonti diagrams. The discussion also covers the COW experiment, the notion of a 'Kibble laboratory', and selected recent developments in Poincaré gauge cosmology and Hamiltonian analysis.

Significance. If judged as a review, the paper is valuable: it gives a coherent and notationally careful presentation of the translational gauge approach, connects it to the larger Poincaré gauge framework, and provides an extensive bibliography. It does not claim new technical results or new falsifiable predictions; its contribution is pedagogical and conceptual synthesis. The central physical statement—that teleparallelism with a specific torsion-squared Lagrangian is equivalent to general relativity—is explicitly presented as an established result imported from the literature rather than re-derived, which is appropriate for a review. The body text is careful to note that the equivalence requires a chosen quadratic torsion Lagrangian and a symmetric energy-momentum tensor, and that the constitutive relation is not fixed by gauge invariance alone. The main weakness is the abstract, which states the equivalence without these qualifications and therefore overstates the deductive power of the gauge principle. This is a presentation issue rather than a technical error.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'The corresponding theory is reviewed and its equivalence to general relativity pointed out' lacks the qualifications given in Section 3; please add, for example, 'for a suitable quadratic torsion Lagrangian and a symmetric energy-momentum tensor' so that the deductive scope is not overstated.
  2. [Section 3, around Eq. (34)] The statement 'It can be shown that the teleparallelism theory... is equivalent to general relativity... see [38]' relies entirely on a citation; since this equivalence is the central result of the review, I suggest displaying the explicit torsion-quadratic Lagrangian (or giving the defining equation from [38]) and adding a sentence noting that gauge invariance alone does not fix the Lagrangian.
  3. [Section 4.6] The line 'The speed of light c = 2.9×10^8 m/s' is numerically incorrect; the accepted value is approximately 2.998×10^8 m/s.
  4. [References [31] and [113]] Author names contain apparent encoding artifacts: 'T. Z/suppress lo´ snik' should be 'T. Złośnik' and 'N. Pop/suppress lawski' should be 'N. Popławski'; please correct these in the published version.
  5. [Section 3, paragraph 'Why did Einstein arrive...'] The statement that 'no bundle theorist has essentially contributed to the understanding of torsion and/or constructively developed teleparallelism' is a strong subjective claim; I recommend softening it or substantiating it with concrete examples, as it is not central to the technical argument.
  6. [Section 4.2, footnote 8] The aside that present cosmological observations 'seem to favor an underlying anti-de Sitter universe' is unsupported; please add a citation or remove the remark.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; this is an explicitly referenced review whose central TG/GR equivalence is cited as a known result rather than re-derived.

full rationale

Reading the manuscript as a review/lecture note, the formal chain is not circular. The Noether identities (61)-(64), the master formula (57), the general field equations (76)-(78), and the Einstein-Cartan equations (84)-(85) are derived by explicit variation of stated Lagrangians; no parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction, and no equation is defined in terms of its own output. The central statement that translational gauge theory is equivalent to GR is explicitly imported: "It can be shown that the teleparallelism theory, for a suitable Lagrangian quadratic in the torsion, is equivalent to general relativity of 1916, provided a symmetric energy-momentum tensor is chosen, see [38]." This is a citation to a known equivalence; [38] is by the first author, but the result is standard and is not used as a premise that presupposes the conclusion of this review. The paper even disclaims rederivation: "We abstain from publishing once more this well-known formalism of TG, but refer to the literature [32] instead." The dependence of the equivalence on a suitable torsion-quadratic Lagrangian and on a symmetric energy-momentum tensor is disclosed in the same sentence; it narrows the claim but does not make it self-referential. I find no step where a predicted quantity reduces by construction to an input, no fitted input called a prediction, and no author-imposed uniqueness theorem invoked to force a choice. The only mild issue is reliance on the author's own [38] for the TG/GR equivalence, which is a presentation-level self-citation rather than circularity, so the score is kept to 1.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters, entities, or fitted values. It reviews models with many coupling constants (e.g., a_I, b_I in the quadratic Lagrangian) but does not fit them or make new predictions. The axioms listed are the standard physical and mathematical premises of the gauge approach to gravity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The gauge principle (localizing a rigid symmetry introduces gauge potentials) is a valid heuristic for deriving interactions.
    Section 1 develops Yang-Mills gauging as the template; this is a standard physics assumption.
  • domain assumption The energy-momentum current of matter is the source of gravity, as opposed to other conserved currents.
    Section 2 argues from Newtonian gravity and special relativity that mass/energy density sources gravity; this is standard physics.
  • domain assumption Teleparallelism with a suitable quadratic Lagrangian is equivalent to general relativity when the energy-momentum tensor is symmetric.
    Section 3 cites ref [38] for this equivalence without re-deriving it in the paper.
  • domain assumption Torsion in Poincaré gauge gravity couples only to the spin of matter, not to orbital angular momentum.
    Section 5 asserts this based on refs [105-108]; it is a physical assumption about test particle motion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Conservation of energy-momentum of matter as the basis for the gauge theory of gravitation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VZ75N5HK

@misc{pith2026190901791,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Conservation of energy-momentum of matter as the basis for the gauge theory of gravitation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VZ75N5HK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01791}
}
abstract

According to Yang \& Mills (1954), a {\it conserved} current and a related rigid (`global') symmetry lie at the foundations of gauge theory. When the rigid symmetry is extended to a {\it local} one, a so-called gauge symmetry, a new interaction emerges as gauge potential $A$; its field strength is $F\sim {\rm curl} A$. In gravity, the conservation of the energy-momentum current of matter and the rigid translation symmetry in the Minkowski space of special relativity lie at the foundations of a gravitational gauge theory. If the translation invariance is made local, a gravitational potential $\vartheta$ arises together with its field strength $T\sim {\rm curl}\,\vartheta$. Thereby the Minkowski space deforms into a Weitzenb\"ock space with nonvanishing torsion $T$ but vanishing curvature. The corresponding theory is reviewed and its equivalence to general relativity pointed out. Since translations form a subgroup of the Poincar\'e group, the group of motion of special relativity, one ought to straightforwardly extend the gauging of the translations to the gauging of full Poincar\'e group thereby also including the conservation law of the {\it angular momentum} current. The emerging Poincar\'e gauge (theory of) gravity, starting from the viable Einstein-Cartan theory of 1961, will be shortly reviewed and its prospects for further developments assessed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01791 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The structure of a gauge theory `a la Yang–Mills is depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Patterned after Tonti [39], pages 402 and 315. We denot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. COW experiment schematically: A neutron beam is split into tw [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Tonti diagram for Poincar´e gauge gravity theory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    F. W. Hehl, Four lectures on Poincar´ e gauge field theory, in: Pr oc. of the 6th Course of the School of Cosmology and Gravitation on Spin, Torsion, Rotation, and Supergravity , Erice, Italy, May 1979, P. G. Bergmann, V. de Sabbata, eds. (Plenum, New York 1980) pp. 5– 61; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3123-0_2 see also the au- thor’s homepage http://...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3123-0_2 1979

  2. [1]

    Heisenberg, ¨Uber den Bau der Atomkerne

    W. Heisenberg, ¨Uber den Bau der Atomkerne. I. Z. Phys.77, 1-11 (1932) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01342433

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01342433 1932

  3. [2]

    Yukawa, On the Interaction of Elementary Parti- cles

    H. Yukawa, On the Interaction of Elementary Parti- cles. I. Proc. Phys.-Math. Soc. Japan 17, 48-57 (1935) https://doi.org/10.11429/ppmsj1919.17.0_48 34

    work page doi:10.11429/ppmsj1919.17.0_48 1935

  4. [3]

    Kemmer, The particle aspect of meson theory

    N. Kemmer, The particle aspect of meson theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 173, 91-116 (1939) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1939.0131

    arXiv 1939

  5. [4]

    C. N. Yang, R. L. Mills, Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance. Phys. Rev. 96, 191-195 (1954) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.96.191

    doi:10.1103/physrev.96.191 1954

  6. [5]

    Kosmann-Schwarzbach, The Noether Theorems (Springer, New York,

    Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach, The Noether Theorems (Springer, New York,

  7. [6]

    Weyl, Elektron und Gravitation

    H. Weyl, Elektron und Gravitation. Zeitschr. Phys. 56, 330-352 (1929) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01339504

    doi:10.1007/bf01339504 1929

  8. [7]

    Fock, Geometrisierung der Diracschen Theorie des Elektrons

    V. Fock, Geometrisierung der Diracschen Theorie des Elektrons. Zeitschr. Phys. 57, 261-277 (1929) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01339714

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01339714 1929

Show all 132 references
  1. [8]

    Weyl, A remark on the coupling of gravitation and electron

    H. Weyl, A remark on the coupling of gravitation and electron. Phy s. Rev. 77, 699-701 (1950) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.77.699

    1950 doi

  2. [9]

    O’Raifeartaigh, Group Structure of Gauge Theo- ries (Cambridge Univ

    L. O’Raifeartaigh, Group Structure of Gauge Theo- ries (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511564031

    1986 doi

  3. [10]

    Mack, Physical principles, geometrical aspects, and locality prop- erties of gauge field theories

    G. Mack, Physical principles, geometrical aspects, and locality prop- erties of gauge field theories. Fortsch. Phys. 29, 135-185 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.19810290402

    1981 doi

  4. [11]

    Chaichian, N

    M. Chaichian, N. F. Nelipa, Introduction to Gauge Field Theories (Springer, Berlin, 1984) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82177-6

    1984 doi

  5. [12]

    F. W. Hehl, Yu. N. Obukhov, Foundations of Classical Electrody- namics: Charge, Flux, and Metric (Birkh¨ auser, Boston, MA, 2003) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0051-2

    2003 doi

  6. [13]

    Mills, Gauge fields

    R. Mills, Gauge fields. Am. J. Phys. 57, 493-507 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15984

    1989 doi

  7. [14]

    Mills, Model of confinement for gauge theories

    R. Mills, Model of confinement for gauge theories. Phys. Rev. L ett. 43, 549-551 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.549 35

    1979 doi

  8. [15]

    Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, 3rd ed

    C. Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, 3rd ed. (Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2012) https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585205.001.0001

    2012

  9. [16]

    S. K. Wong, Field and particle equations for the classical Yang-M ills field and particles with isotopic spin. Nuovo Cim. A 65, 689-694 (1970) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02892134

    1970 doi

  10. [17]

    Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton Lectures of May 1921, 5th ed

    A. Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton Lectures of May 1921, 5th ed. (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1955)

    1921

  11. [18]

    E. P. Wigner, On unitary representations of the inhomo- geneous Lorentz group. Annals Math. 40, 149-204 (1939) https://doi.org/10.2307/1968551

    1939 doi

  12. [19]

    J Sakurai, Theory of strong interactions

    J. J Sakurai, Theory of strong interactions. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 1-48 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(60)90126-3

    1960 doi

  13. [20]

    S. L. Glashow, M. Gell-Mann, Gauge theories of vec- tor particles. Ann. Phys. (USA) 15, 296-297 (1961) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90020-3

    1961 doi

  14. [21]

    Feynman, F

    R. Feynman, F. B. Morinigo, W. G. Wagner,Feynman Lectures on Grav- itation, Lectures given 1962/63, B. Hatfield, ed. (Addison-Wesley, Read- ing, MA, 1995)

    1962

  15. [23]

    D. W. Sciama, The analogy between charge and spin in general relativity. In: Recent Developments in General Relativity, Festschrift fo r Infeld (Pergamon Press, Oxford; PWN, Warsaw, 1962) 415–439

    1962

  16. [24]

    Itin, Energy momentum current for coframe gravity, Class

    Y. Itin, Energy momentum current for coframe gravity, Class. Quantum Grav. 19, 173 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/19/1/311

    2002 doi

  17. [25]

    F. W. Hehl, Y. Itin, Yu. N. Obukhov, On Kottler’s path: origin and evolution of the premetric program in gravity and in electrodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1640016 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218271816400162 36

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Blagojevi´ c, F

    M. Blagojevi´ c, F. W. Hehl (eds.), Gauge Theories of Gravitation: A Reader with Commentaries (Imperial College Press, London, 2013) https://doi.org/10.1142/p781

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    Y. M. Cho, Einstein Lagrangian as the translational Yang- Mills Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2521–2525 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.2521

    1976 doi

  20. [28]

    Nitsch, F

    J. Nitsch, F. W. Hehl, Translational gauge theory of gravity: P ost- newtonian approximation and spin precession. Phys. Lett. B 90, 98-102 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90059-3

    1980 doi

  21. [29]

    Yu. N. Obukhov, J. G. Pereira, Metric affine approach to teleparallel gravity. Phys. Rev. D 67, 044016 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.044016

    2003 doi

  22. [30]

    J. G. Pereira, Yu. N. Obukhov, Gauge structure of teleparallel gravity. Universe 5, no. 6, 139 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5060139

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    Koivisto, M

    T. Koivisto, M. Hohmann, T. Z/suppress lo´ snik, The general lin- ear Cartan khronon. Universe 5, no. 6, 168 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5070168

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    Aldrovandi and J

    R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira, Teleparallel Gravity: An Introduction (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5143-9

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    Weitzenb¨ ock,Invariantentheorie (Noordhoff, Groningen, 1923)

    R. Weitzenb¨ ock,Invariantentheorie (Noordhoff, Groningen, 1923)

    1923

  26. [34]

    Weitzenb¨ ock, Differentialinvarianten in der Einsteinschen Theorie des Fernparallelismus

    R. Weitzenb¨ ock, Differentialinvarianten in der Einsteinschen Theorie des Fernparallelismus. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Phys.-math. Klasse (1928) pp.466–474

    1928

  27. [35]

    Einstein, Riemann-Geometrie mit Aufrechterhaltung des Beg riffes des Fernparallelismus

    A. Einstein, Riemann-Geometrie mit Aufrechterhaltung des Beg riffes des Fernparallelismus. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Ph ys.- math. Klasse (1928) pp. 217-221

    1928

  28. [36]

    Møller, Further remarks on the localization of the energy in th e general theory of relativity

    C. Møller, Further remarks on the localization of the energy in th e general theory of relativity. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 12, 118-133 (1961) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90148-8

    1961 doi

  29. [37]

    Møller, Conservation laws and absolute parallelism in general re la- tivity

    C. Møller, Conservation laws and absolute parallelism in general re la- tivity. Mat.-Fys. Skr. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. 1, no. 10 (1961) 37

    1961

  30. [39]

    E. Tonti, The Mathematical Structure of Classical and Relativistic Physics, A general classification diagram (Birkh¨ auser-Springer, New York, 2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7422-7

    2013 doi

  31. [40]

    Itin, Yu

    Y. Itin, Yu. N. Obukhov, J. Boos, F. W. Hehl, Premetric telepar allel theory of gravity and its local and linear constitutive law. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 907 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6344-5

    2018 doi

  32. [41]

    Rund, Representations of the duals of gauge field tensors

    H. Rund, Representations of the duals of gauge field tensors. J. Math. Phys. 20, 1392-1397 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.524246

    1979 doi

  33. [42]

    E. J. Post, Formal Structure of Electromagnetics – General Covariance and Electromagnetics (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1962, and Dover, Mineola, NY, 1997)

    1962

  34. [43]

    Y. Itin, F. W. Hehl, Yu. N. Obukhov, Premetric equivalent of gen - eral relativity: Teleparallelism. Phys. Rev. D 95, 084020 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084020

    2017 doi

  35. [44]

    Kopczy´ nski, A

    W. Kopczy´ nski, A. Trautman,Space-time and gravitation (Wiley, Chich- ester, UK, 1992)

    1992

  36. [45]

    F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, Weyl spacetimes, the dila- tion current, and creation of gravitating mass by symmetry break ing. In: Exact Sciences and their Philosophical Foundations, Herma nn Weyl Congress 1985, W. Deppert et al., eds. (Lang, Frankfurt am Main, 1988)...

    1985

  37. [46]

    Physique des d efaults

    E. Kr¨ oner, Continuum theory of defects, in: “Physique des d efaults” Les Houches, 1980, Session 35, Eds. R. Balain et al. (North-Holland , Amsterdam, 1981) pp. 215-315

    1980

  38. [47]

    R. W. Sharpe, Differential Geometry: Cartan ’s generalization of Klein ’s Erlangen program (Springer, New York, 1997)

    1997

  39. [48]

    Sternberg, Curvature in Mathematics and Physics (Dover Publica- tions, Minneola, New York, 2012) 38

    S. Sternberg, Curvature in Mathematics and Physics (Dover Publica- tions, Minneola, New York, 2012) 38

    2012

  40. [49]

    E. L. Sch¨ ucking, E. J. Surowitz, Einstein ’s Apple: Homo- geneous Einstein Fields (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015) https://doi.org/10.1142/9333

    2015 doi

  41. [50]

    Colella, A

    R. Colella, A. W. Overhauser, S. A. Werner, Observation of gra vita- tionally induced quantum interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1472-1474 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.1472

    1975 doi

  42. [52]

    Kasevich, S

    M. Kasevich, S. Chu, Atomic interferometry using stimu- lated Raman transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 181-184 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.181

    1991 doi

  43. [53]

    Asenbaum, C

    P. Asenbaum, C. Overstreet, T. Kovachy, D. D. Brown, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, Phase shift in an atom interferometer due to space time curvature across its wave function. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 183602 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.183602

    2017 doi

  44. [54]

    Overstreet, P

    C. Overstreet, P. Asenbaum, T. Kovachy, R. Notermans, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, Effective inertial frame in an atom interferometric test of the equivalence principle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 183604 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.183604

    2018 doi

  45. [55]

    Audretsch, F

    J. Audretsch, F. W. Hehl, C. L¨ ammerzahl, Matter wave interf erome- try and why quantum objects are fundamental for establishing a g ravi- tational theory. In: Relativistic Gravity Research: With Emphasis on Experiments and Observation: Proceedings . J. Ehlers and G. Schae- f...

    1992 doi

  46. [56]

    Nesvizhevsky, A

    V. Nesvizhevsky, A. Voronin, Surprising Quantum Bounces (Imperial College Press, London, 2015) https://doi.org/10.1142/p978

    2015 doi

  47. [57]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field. J. Math. Phys. 2, 212-221 (1961) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1703702

    1961 doi

  48. [58]

    F. W. Hehl, W.-T. Ni, Inertial effects of a Dirac particle. Phys. Re v. D 42, 2045-2048 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.2045 39

    1990 doi

  49. [59]

    Mashhoon, Neutron interferometry in a rotating frame of reference

    B. Mashhoon, Neutron interferometry in a rotating frame of reference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2639-2542 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2639

    1988 doi

  50. [60]

    Mashhoon, On the spin-rotation-gravity coupling

    B. Mashhoon, On the spin-rotation-gravity coupling. Gen. Relat. Gravit. 31, 681-691 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026649213136

    1999 doi

  51. [61]

    Danner, B

    A. Danner, B. Demirel, W. Kersten, H. Lemmel, R. Wag- ner, S. Sponar, Y. Hasegawa, Spin-rotation coupling observed in neutron interferometry. NPJ Quantum Information 6, 23 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-020-0254-8

    2020 doi

  52. [62]

    Iwanenko, A

    D. Iwanenko, A. Sokolow, Klassische Feldtheorie (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1953)

    1953

  53. [63]

    Hund, Materie als Feld (Springer, Berlin, 1954)

    F. Hund, Materie als Feld (Springer, Berlin, 1954)

    1954

  54. [64]

    (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2019) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511563997

    Tian Yu Cao, Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field The- ories, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2019) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511563997

    2019 doi

  55. [65]

    Mashhoon, Gravitoelectromagnetism: a brief review

    B. Mashhoon, Gravitoelectromagnetism: a brief review. In: The Measurement of Gravitomagnetism: A Challenging En- terprise, ed. L. Iorio (Nova, Hauppauge, NY, 2007) 29–39 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311030

    2007 arXiv

  56. [66]

    von der Heyde, The equivalence principle in the U4 the- ory of gravitation, Lett

    P. von der Heyde, The equivalence principle in the U4 the- ory of gravitation, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 14, 250-252 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02745635

    1975 doi

  57. [67]

    Hartley, Normal frames for non-Riemannian con- nections

    D. Hartley, Normal frames for non-Riemannian con- nections. Class. Quantum Grav. 12, L103-L105 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/12/11/001

    1995 doi

  58. [68]

    B. Z. Iliev, Normal frames and the validity of the equivalence prin ciple: I. Cases in a neighborhood and at a point. J. Phys. A 29, 6895-6902 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/29/21/020

    1996 doi

  59. [69]

    J. M. Nester, Normal frames for general connections. Ann.Phys. (Berlin) 19, 45-52 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.200910373

    2010 doi

  60. [70]

    Utiyama, Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction

    R. Utiyama, Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction. Phys. Rev. 101, 1597-1607 (1956) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.101.1597 40

    1956 doi

  61. [71]

    Tresguerres, Translations and dynamics

    R. Tresguerres, Translations and dynamics. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 5, 905-945 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887808003120

    2008 doi

  62. [72]

    K. S. Stelle, P. C. West, Spontaneously broken de Sitter symme try and the gravitational holonomy group. Phys. Rev. D 21, 1466-1488 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.1466

    1980 doi

  63. [73]

    Yu. N. Obukhov, Poincar´ e gauge gravity: Selected top- ics. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 3, 95-137 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1142/S021988780600103X

    2006 doi

  64. [74]

    Yu. N. Obukhov, Poincar´ e gauge gravity: An overview. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 15, Supp. 1, 1840005 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887818400054

    2018 doi

  65. [75]

    V. N. Ponomarev, A. O. Barvinsky, Yu. N. Obukhov, Gauge Approach and Quantization Methods in Gravity Theory (Nauka, Moscow, 2017)

    2017

  66. [76]

    E. W. Mielke, Geometrodynamics of Gauge Fields: On the Geometry of Yang-Mills and Gravitational Gauge Theories, 2nd ed. (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29734-7

    2017 doi

  67. [77]

    F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, Y. Ne’eman, Metric affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance. Phys. Rept. 258, 1-171 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)00111-F

    1995 doi

  68. [78]

    Schr¨ odinger, Space-Time Structure, reprinted with cor- rections (Cambridge Univ

    E. Schr¨ odinger, Space-Time Structure, reprinted with cor- rections (Cambridge Univ. Press, London, UK, 1960) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586446

    1960 doi

  69. [79]

    J. A. Schouten, Ricci Calculus, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin 1954) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12927-2

    1954 doi

  70. [80]

    J. A. Schouten, Tensor Analysis for Physicists, 2nd ed. reprinted (Dover, Mineola, NY, 1989)

    1989

  71. [81]

    F. W. Hehl, Yu. N. Obukhov, ´Elie Cartan’s torsion in geometry and in field theory, an essay. Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 32, 157-194 (2007) https://aflb.minesparis.psl.eu/AFLB-322/aflb322m595.htm 41

    2007

  72. [82]

    Von der Heyde, The field equations of the Poincar´ e gauge theory of gravitation

    P. Von der Heyde, The field equations of the Poincar´ e gauge theory of gravitation. Phys. Lett. A 58, 141-143 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(76)90266-8

    1976 doi

  73. [83]

    F. W. Hehl, P. von Der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick, J. M. Nester, Gener al relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects. Rev. M od. Phys. 48, 393 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.48.393

    1976 doi

  74. [84]

    F. W. Hehl, J. Nitsch, P. von der Heyde, Gravitation and Poincar ´ e gauge field theory with quadratic Lagrangian. In: General relativity and Gravitation—One Hundred Years after the Birth of Albert Einst ein, A. Held (ed.) (Plenum Press, New York, 1980), vol.1, pp. 329-355

    1980

  75. [85]

    Hojman, C

    R. Hojman, C. Mukku, W. A. Sayed, Parity violation in metric torsion theories of gravitation. Phys. Rev. D 22, 1915-1921 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1915

    1980 doi

  76. [86]

    Holst, Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action

    S. Holst, Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action. Phys. Rev. D 53, 5966-5969 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5966

    1996 doi

  77. [87]

    J. Boos, F. W. Hehl, Gravity-induced four-fermion con- tact interaction implies gravitational intermediate W and Z type gauge bosons. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 751-756 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-016-3216-3

    2017 doi

  78. [88]

    Diakonov, A

    D. Diakonov, A. G. Tumanov, A. A. Vladimirov, Low-energy gene ral relativity with torsion: A systematic derivative expansion. Phys. Re v. D 84, 124042 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.124042

    2011 doi

  79. [89]

    Baekler, F

    P. Baekler, F. W. Hehl, Beyond Einstein-Cartan gravity: quadr atic torsion and curvature invariants with even and odd parity includ- ing all boundary terms. Class. Quantum Grav. 28, 215017 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/215017

    2011 doi

  80. [90]

    Baekler, F

    P. Baekler, F. W. Hehl, J. M. Nester, Poincar´ e gauge the- ory of gravity: Friedman cosmology with even and odd par- ity modes: Analytic part. Phys. Rev. D 83, 024001 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024001

    2011 doi

  81. [91]

    Chen, F.-H

    H. Chen, F.-H. Ho, J. M. Nester, C.-H. Wang, H.-J. Yo, Cosmological dy- namics with propagating Lorentz connection modes of spin zero. JC AP 10, 027 (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/027 42

    2009 doi

  82. [92]

    F. H. Ho, J. M. Nester, Poincar´ e gauge theory with cou- pled even and odd parity spin-0 modes: cosmological nor- mal modes. Ann. d. Physik (Berlin) 524, 97-106 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201100101

    2012 doi

  83. [93]

    F. H. Ho, J. M. Nester, Poincar´ e gauge theory with coupled ev en and odd parity dynamic spin-0 modes: dynamical equations for isotropic Bianchi cosmologies. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20, 2125-2138 (2011) http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218271811020391

    2011 doi

  84. [94]

    F. H. Ho, H. Chen, J. M. Nester, H. J. Yo, General Poincar´ e gauge theory cosmology. Chin. J. Phys. 53, 110109 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.6122/CJP.20151014

    2015 doi

  85. [95]

    G. K. Karananas, The particle spectrum of parity-violating Poincar´ e gravitational theory. Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 055012 (2015); Corrigendum: Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 089501 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/5/055012

    2015 doi

  86. [96]

    Blagojevi´ c, B

    M. Blagojevi´ c, B. Cvetkovi´ c, General Poincar´ e gauge theory: Hamilto- nian structure and particle spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104018 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024014

    2018 doi

  87. [97]

    I. L. Shapiro, Physical aspects of the space- time torsion. Phys. Repts. 357, 113-213 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00030-8

    2002 doi

  88. [98]

    J. A. R. Cembranos, J. G. Valcarcel, New torsion black hole solutions in Poincar´ e gauge theory. JCAP 01, 014 (2017) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/014

    2017 doi

  89. [99]

    J. A. R. Cembranos, J. G. Valcarcel, Extended Reissner-Nord str¨ om so- lutions sourced by dynamical torsion. Phys. Lett. B 779, 143-150 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.081

    2018 doi

  90. [100]

    Heinicke, F

    C. Heinicke, F. W. Hehl, Schwarzschild and Kerr Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equation – an introduction. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530006 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271815300062

    2014 doi

  91. [101]

    Yu. N. Obukhov, Exact solutions in Poincar´ e gauge gravity theory. Uni- verse 5(5), 127 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5050127

    2019 doi

  92. [102]

    H. T. Nieh, Torsion in gauge theory. Phys. Rev. D 97, 044027 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.044027 43

    2018 doi

  93. [103]

    H. T. Nieh, Torsional topological invariants. Phys. Rev. D 98, 104045 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.104045

    2018 doi

  94. [104]

    Einstein, Geometrie und Erfahrung

    A. Einstein, Geometrie und Erfahrung. Sitzungsber. Preuss . Akad. Wiss. Phys.-math. Klasse 1, 123-130 (1921)

    1921

  95. [105]

    von der Heyde, Is gravitation mediated by the tor- sion of spacetime? Z

    P. von der Heyde, Is gravitation mediated by the tor- sion of spacetime? Z. Naturf. 31a, 1725-1726 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1976-1243

    1976 doi

  96. [106]

    P. B. Yasskin, W. R. Stoeger, Propagating equations for tes t bodies with spin and rotation in theories of gravity with torsion. Phys. Rev. D 21, 2081-2094 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2081

    1980 doi

  97. [107]

    F. W. Hehl, Yu. N. Obukhov, D. Puetzfeld, On Poincar´ e gauge theory of gravity, its equations of motion, and Gravity Probe B. Phys. Lett. A 377, 1775-1781 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.04.055

    2013 doi

  98. [108]

    Yu. N. Obukhov, D. Puetzfeld, Multipolar test body equa- tions of motion in generalized gravity theories, Fundamen- tal Theories of Physics 179, 67-119 (Springer, Cham, 2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18335-0_2

    2015 doi

  99. [109]

    Trautman, Spin and torsion may avert gravita- tional singularity

    A. Trautman, Spin and torsion may avert gravita- tional singularity. Nature Phys. Sci. 242, 7-8 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1038/physci242007a0

    1973 doi

  100. [110]

    A. V. Minkevich, Generalized cosmological Friedmann equations without gravitational singularity. Phys. Lett. A 80, 232-234 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(80)90008-0

    1980 doi

  101. [111]

    A. V. Minkevich, Towards the theory of regular accelerating U niverse in Riemann-Cartan space-time. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, 1641011 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X16410116

    2016 doi

  102. [112]

    Magueijo, T

    J. Magueijo, T. G. Z/suppress lo´ snik, T. W. B. Kibble, Cos- mology with a spin. Phys. Rev. D 87, 063504 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.063504

    2013 doi

  103. [113]

    Pop/suppress lawski, Big bounce from spin and torsion

    N. Pop/suppress lawski, Big bounce from spin and torsion. Gen. Relat. Gravit. 44, 1007-1014 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1323-2 44

    2012 doi

  104. [114]

    Puetzfeld, Status of non-Riemannian cosmol- ogy

    D. Puetzfeld, Status of non-Riemannian cosmol- ogy. New Astronomy Reviews 49, 59-64 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2005.01.022

    2005 doi

  105. [115]

    Zhang, L

    H. Zhang, L. Xu, Late-time acceleration and inflation in a Poincar´ e gauge cosmological model. JCAP 09, 050 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/09/050

    2019 doi

  106. [116]

    Kranas, C

    D. Kranas, C. G. Tsagas, J. D. Barrow, D. Iosifidis, Friedman n- like universes with torsion. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 341 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6822-4

    2019 doi

  107. [117]

    J. D. Barrow, C. G. Tsagas, G. Fanaras, Friedmann-like universes with weak torsion: a dynamical system approach Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 764 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7270-x

    2019 doi

  108. [118]

    Nikiforova, S

    V. Nikiforova, S. Randjbar-Daemi, V. Rubakov, Infrared mo dified gravity with dynamical torsion. Phys. Rev. D 80, 124050 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124050

    2009 doi

  109. [119]

    Nikiforova, S

    V. Nikiforova, S. Randjbar-Daemi, V. Rubakov, Self-acceler ating uni- verse in modified gravity with dynamical torsion. Phys. Rev. D 95, 024013 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024013

    2017 doi

  110. [120]

    Nikiforova, T

    V. Nikiforova, T. Damour, Infrared modified gravity with prop agating torsion: Instability of torsionfull de Sitter-like solutions. Phys. Re v. D 97, 124014 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124014

    2018 doi

  111. [121]

    Damour, V

    T. Damour, V. Nikiforova, Spherically symmetric solu- tions in torsion bigravity. Phys. Rev. D 100, 024065 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024065

    2019 doi

  112. [122]

    Struckmeier, D

    J. Struckmeier, D. Vasak, H. Stoecker, Extended canonica l field the- ory of matter and space-time. Astron. Nachr. 336, 731-738 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201512247

    2015 doi

  113. [123]

    Struckmeier, J

    J. Struckmeier, J. Muench, D. Vasak, J. Kirsch, M. Hanauske, H. Stoecker, Canonical transformation path to gauge theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D 95, 124048 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124048

    2017 doi

  114. [124]

    Struckmeier, D

    J. Struckmeier, D. Vasak, J. Kirsch, Generic theory of ge- ometrodynamics from Noether’s theorem for the Diff(M) symme- try group. In: Discoveries at the Frontiers of Science , J. Kirsch, 45 S. Schramm, J. Steinheimer-Froschauer, H. St¨ ocker (eds), FIAS Interdisciplinary Scien...

    2020 doi

  115. [125]

    Blagojevi´ c, B

    M. Blagojevi´ c, B. Cvetkovi´ c, Entropy in Poincar´ e gauge the- ory: Hamiltonian approach. Phys. Rev. D 99, 104058 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104058

    2019 doi

  116. [126]

    Blagojevi´ c, B

    M. Blagojevi´ c, B. Cvetkovi´ c, Hamiltonian approach to blac k hole entropy: Kerr-like spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 100, 044029 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044029

    2019 doi

  117. [127]

    Toller, A theory of gravitation covariant under Sp(4,R ), https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07470

    M. Toller, A theory of gravitation covariant under Sp(4,R ), https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07470

    arXiv

  118. [128]

    Mashhoon, Nonlocal Gravity (Oxford Univ

    B. Mashhoon, Nonlocal Gravity (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK,

  119. [129]

    F. W. Hehl, B. Mashhoon, Nonlocal gravity simu- lates dark matter. Phys. Lett. B 673, 279-282 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.02.033

    2009 doi

  120. [130]

    F. W. Hehl, B. Mashhoon, A formal framework for a nonlocal g ener- alization of Einstein’s theory of gravitation. Phys. Rev. D 79, 064028 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064028

    2009 doi

  121. [131]

    Puetzfeld, Yu

    D. Puetzfeld, Yu. N. Obukhov, F. W. Hehl, Constitutive law of nonlocal gravity. Phys. Rev. D 99, 104013 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104013

    2019 doi

  122. [132]

    H. J. Blome, C. Chicone, F. W. Hehl, B. Mashhoon, Nonlocal modification of Newtonian gravity. Phys. Rev. D 81, 065020 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.065020 46

    2010 doi

  123. [2011]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87868-3

    doi

  124. [2017]

    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803805.001.0001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.