Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Modular Arithmetic with Nodal Lines: Drumhead Surface States in ZrSiTe

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the nodal-line semimetal ZrSiTe, a confined Berry phase of π makes topological drumhead surface states appear exactly between the surface projections of two nodal lines, and ARPES confirms the prediction.

desk verdict Solid, well-executed study of ZrSiTe drumhead states with a useful Z2 framing; the SOC treatment is the one soft spot that should be addressed in revision. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02154 v1 pith:VC2B5M7G submitted 2019-09-04 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Lukas Muechler , Andreas Topp , Raquel Queiroz , Maxim Krivenkov , Andrei Varykhalov , Jennifer Cano , Christian R. Ast , Leslie M. Schoop This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nodallinesemimetaldrumheadsurfacestatesBerryphaseWilsonloopWannierchargecentersZrSiTeARPESZ2topology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ZrSiTe is a layered material whose band structure contains two nearly flat nodal lines, one in the $k_z=0$ plane and one in the $k_z=\pi$ plane. The paper shows that these nodal lines leave a precise fingerprint on the (001) surface: a Berry phase of $\pi$, computed by Wilson loops along the stacking direction, exists only in the surface region where exactly one of the two nodal lines projects. In the region where both project, their Berry phases add to $2\pi$, which is the same as zero, so no topological state is allowed. This rule, a kind of $\mathbb{Z}_2$ modular arithmetic, predicts a ribbon of topological drumhead surface states bounded by the nodal-line projections, and angle-resolved photoemission measurements place the observed surface states exactly in that ribbon. The paper also separates these topological states from a coexisting trivial floating band surface state that arises from surface symmetry breaking, giving the first complete characterization of topological surface states in the square-net nodal-line semimetal family.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Wilson loop along $\mathbf{k}_z$: $W(\ell)=\mathcal{P}\exp[-\oint_\ell d\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{k})]$, whose determinant defines the Berry phase $\gamma$ via $e^{i\gamma}=\det W$. The glide mirror $\bar{M}_z$ reverses the loop, forcing $\gamma$ to be quantized to $0$ or $\pi$. The eigenvalues of the Wilson loop are the Wannier charge centers (WCCs) $\phi_i(k_x,k_y)$; under $\bar{M}_z$ they sit either at $\phi=0$, at $\phi=\pi$, or in complex-conjugate pairs $(\lambda,-\lambda)$. An odd number of WCCs at the unit-cell boundary ($\phi=\pi$) corresponds to a Berry phase $\pi$ and, by slab geometry, to topological drumhead surface states. An exact algorithm (Appendix A) derives the number of WCCs at these positions from the $\bar{M}_z$ eigenvalues of occupied bands at $k_z=0$ and $k_z=\pi$, which is how the paper obtains the modular arithmetic: the Berry phases of the two nodal lines add modulo $2\pi$, so overlapping projections sum to $2\pi\equiv 0$ and kill the drumhead states.

What would settle it

Repeat the Wilson-loop computation with spin-orbit coupling included in the DFT Hamiltonian: if the number of Wannier charge centers at the unit-cell boundary (the $\phi=\pi$ positions) changes parity relative to the no-SOC calculation anywhere inside the predicted drumhead region, the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ classification fails and the drumhead ribbon would not appear where claimed. Experimentally, a spin-resolved ARPES map that resolves the two SOC-split drumhead branches could check whether they remain confined between the NL1 and NL2 projections at all binding energies.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the (001) surface of ZrSiTe, the paper establishes that topological drumhead surface states are controlled by a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-quantized Berry phase $\gamma(k_x,k_y)$ obtained from Wilson loops along $k_z$. The glide mirror $\bar{M}_z$ forces $\gamma$ to be $0$ or $\pi$. Where the surface projections of nodal lines NL1 ($k_z=0$) and NL2 ($k_z=\pi$) overlap, each line contributes $\pi$, so $\gamma=2\pi\equiv 0$ and no drumhead states form; where exactly one line projects, $\gamma=\pi$ and drumhead states exist; elsewhere $\gamma=0$. The same $\mathbb{Z}_2$ structure acts as modular arithmetic on the surface states, so states derived from different nodal lines hybridize and gap in the overlap region. The paper confirms this with slab calculations, with Wilson-loop spectra derived from the $\bar{M}_z$ eigenvalues of occupied bands, and with ARPES data that locate the drumhead states precisely between NL1 and NL2. It additionally identifies a topologically trivial floating band state whose steep dispersion distinguishes it from the drumhead states.

Load-bearing premise

The classification is carried out without spin-orbit coupling, and the paper assumes SOC can be treated as a small perturbation that leaves the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Berry phase and the drumhead region essentially unchanged.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The drumhead states appear as a ribbon restricted to the region where exactly one nodal line projects; ARPES confirms their location in ZrSiTe.
  • Where the two nodal-line projections overlap, the drumhead states hybridize and gap, a direct consequence of the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ modular arithmetic that can be checked in other materials.
  • The Wilson-loop spectrum, obtained from symmetry eigenvalues, predicts surface-state topology without computing surfaces, so it can be used as a bulk-only diagnostic.
  • The topological drumhead states and the trivial floating band states coexist but have clearly different dispersions, so they can be separated in ARPES and in transport experiments.
  • Spin-orbit coupling, though it gaps the nodal lines, splits the drumhead states into two branches while leaving them clearly visible, so the topological surface states should survive perturbatively in real ZrSiTe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same $\mathbb{Z}_2$ modular arithmetic should apply to any material with two symmetry-related nodal lines of the same class projecting onto a surface: the drumhead ribbon is the region of the surface Brillouin zone where an odd number of nodal lines project, i.e., the XOR of the projected disks, not their union.
  • If a material could be tuned so that the two nodal-line projections exactly coincide, the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ sum would annihilate the drumhead states across the whole ribbon, providing a topological transition that could be driven by pressure or strain.
  • The bulk-only Wilson-loop mapping in the paper could be converted into a symmetry-indicator screening tool to search square-net materials for drumhead surface states without expensive slab calculations.
  • The coexistence of a topological and a trivial surface state with very different dispersions might let scanning tunneling spectroscopy isolate the topological contribution by comparing regions inside and outside the predicted Berry-phase ribbon.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a combined DFT, Wilson-loop, and ARPES study of the nodal-line semimetal ZrSiTe. It identifies two mirror-protected nodal lines, NL1 in the kz=0 plane and NL2 in the kz=pi plane, and computes the abelian Berry phase along kz as a function of (kx,ky), obtaining a region of pi Berry phase between the surface projections of the two nodal lines. Using Wannier charge centers constrained by the nonsymmorphic mirror Mz, the authors show that in this region one WCC is pinned at the pi-invariant position, giving rise to topological drumhead surface states on the (001) surface; where the two nodal lines overlap in projection, the total Berry phase is 2pi = 0 modulo 2pi, so no topological state is expected, illustrating the 'Z2 modular arithmetic.' Slab calculations and ARPES measurements at BESSY II reveal a crescent-shaped drumhead state confined between the surface projections of NL1 and NL2, split into two branches by SOC, together with a trivial floating band near X. The paper concludes that this is the first complete characterization of topological surface states in the square-net nodal-line family of materials.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper provides a clear example in which surface states are demonstrably confined to the region of nontrivial Berry phase in the surface Brillouin zone, and it explicitly demonstrates how two pi contributions cancel when nodal lines overlap in projection. The analysis in terms of Wannier charge centers and Mz eigenvalue data is a parameter-free, symmetry-based explanation of the surface-state pattern, and the ARPES data directly support the predicted spatial extent of the drumhead ribbon. The careful separation of topological drumhead states from the trivial floating band is a valuable control. The principal weakness is that the topological classification is established only without spin-orbit coupling, while the material has SOC that gaps the nodal lines; the robustness of the classification to SOC is argued but not certified by a spinful Wilson-loop computation. This weakness is localized and addressable, so the work is a strong candidate for publication after revision.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section III.C] The central topological claim concerns the real material, yet the Wilson-loop and Wannier-charge-center analysis in Section III.B is performed for a spinless 14-band Hamiltonian. The authors state that the nodal lines in ZrSiTe gap once SOC is included, and they argue that SOC can be treated as a small perturbation. However, no spinful Wilson-loop spectrum or spinful Mz-eigenvalue mapping is presented. The spinful slab spectral function in Fig. 4 shows that surface spectral weight remains, but a surface spectral function cannot certify the bulk topological classification; trivial surface states such as the floating band also appear in regions with zero Berry phase. Because the conclusion that the ARPES-observed drumhead ribbon is topologically required in ZrSiTe depends on the spinless classification surviving SOC, this is a load-bearing gap. I recommend either (i) computing the Wilson-loop spectrum with SOC along the same kx cuts as in Fig. 3(c) and tabulating the resulting N_+1, N_-1, and N_{alpha,alpha*} counts for the 28 occupied spinor bands, or (ii) explicitly rephrasing the central claim as a prediction of the spinless model that is consistent with, but not fully certified by, the SOC-included calculations.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III.B] The sentence 'Therefore, two WCCs are quantized to 0, pi respectively, i.e. both Pos.1a and 1b are occupied' is ambiguous because in the immediately preceding region Table I gives N_+1=1 and N_-1=1; please clarify the correspondence between the N_+1/N_-1 counts and the WCCs at Pos.1a and Pos.1b.
  2. [Abstract and Section I] The term 'Z2 modular arithmetic' is evocative but is never explicitly defined; please provide a precise definition, e.g., that the Berry phase takes values in {0, pi} and combines additively modulo 2pi, so that pi + pi = 0.
  3. [Section IV] The claim of 'excellent agreement' between ARPES and calculation is based on visual overlap of the traced drumhead region with the calculated projection; a quantitative comparison, such as the energy dispersion of the drumhead branches along cuts 1-4 or the k-space width of the ribbon as a function of energy, would strengthen the experimental confirmation.
  4. [Fig. 5(c)] The red line superimposed on the calculated Fermi-surface projection is described only as 'the bulk nodal line'; please specify which nodal line or combined projection is shown and whether it is obtained with or without SOC.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the drumhead region is computed from bulk Wilson loops and independently confirmed by ARPES; cited self-results are auxiliary and independently established.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The nodal lines, Berry phase, and Wannier charge centers are computed from DFT and Wannier-interpolated bulk Hamiltonians; the region of pi Berry phase is obtained by explicit Wilson-loop calculations along kz (Eqs. 1-5 and Fig. 2d), not assumed from the surface calculation. The surface slab calculation is then used as a validation of the bulk-boundary correspondence, and the ARPES measurements are an independent external check that the observed high-intensity surface states lie between the nodal-line projections. No parameter is fitted to the ARPES data, and no 'prediction' is constructed by renaming an input quantity. The Z2 quantization is derived in Eqs. (3)-(4) from the mirror symmetry rather than imported as an unexplained ansatz. The WCC mapping in Appendix A is attributed to previously published theorems, including one paper by an author (ref. 52), but that theorem is parameter-free, states explicit assumptions, and does not include ZrSiTe or the target drumhead region as an input; its use is therefore genuine mathematical support rather than a self-citation chain forcing the conclusion. Similarly, the floating-band identification is taken from prior published work on ZrSiS and is not the central topological claim. The SOC discussion is an acknowledged limitation and a robustness concern, not a circular step: the paper explicitly states that SOC gaps the nodal lines and then provides a separate DFT-with-SOC spectral function as a numerical check. Therefore no claim reduces by construction to its inputs, and the finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard band topology machinery (Wilson loops, Berry phase quantization, bulk-boundary correspondence) and on the DFT-Wannier description of ZrSiTe. No free parameters are fitted to produce the surface state prediction; the only notable assumption is the perturbative treatment of SOC, which the authors partially validate with additional DFT calculations.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Berry phase quantization to 0 or pi when a unitary symmetry reverses the Wilson loop path (Eq. 3-4).
    Derived in Section III.B using standard Wilson loop properties.
  • domain assumption Bulk-boundary correspondence: surface termination cutting through an odd number of Wannier charge centers implies topological surface states.
    Used in Section III.B to connect WCC positions to drumhead states.
  • standard math The mapping in Appendix A from symmetry eigenvalues to Wilson loop spectrum is exact and uniquely determines WCC positions for nonsymmorphic symmetries.
    Relys on published results from Alexandradinata et al. and Muechler et al.; referenced without proof.
  • ad hoc to paper SOC can be treated perturbatively and does not change the topological classification.
    Assumed in Section III.C because nodal lines gap with SOC; partially validated by DFT-with-SOC surface spectral function.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modular Arithmetic with Nodal Lines: Drumhead Surface States in ZrSiTe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VC2B5M7G

@misc{pith2026190902154,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modular Arithmetic with Nodal Lines: Drumhead Surface States in ZrSiTe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VC2B5M7G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02154}
}
abstract

We study the electronic structure of the nodal line semimetal ZrSiTe both experimentally and theoretically. We find two different surface states in ZrSiTe - topological drumhead surface states and trivial floating band surface states. Using the spectra of Wilson loops, we show that a non-trivial Berry phase that exists in a confined region within the Brillouin Zone gives rise to the topological drumhead-type surface states. The $\mathbb{Z}_2$ structure of the Berry phase induces a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ 'modular arithmetic' of the surface states, allowing surface states deriving from different nodal lines to hybridize and gap out, which can be probed by a set of Wilson loops. Our findings are confirmed by \textit{ab-initio} calculations and angle-resolved photoemission experiments, which are in excellent agreement with each other and the topological analysis. This is the first complete characterization of topological surface states in the family of square-net based nodal line semimetals and thus fundamentally increases the understanding of the topological nature of this growing class of topological semimetals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02154 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of ZrSiTe, Si atoms are dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Bulk band structure of ZrSiTe without SOC. (b) ZrSiTe nodal line connectivity in the 3D BZ (top) and (001) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) WCC positions constrained by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Surface spectral function of ZrSiTe (001) along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. ARPES data, taken at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Yan \ and\ author C

    author author B. Yan \ and\ author C. Felser ,\ @noop journal journal Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys \ volume 8 ,\ pages 337 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Armitage , author E

    author author N. Armitage , author E. Mele , \ and\ author A. Vishwanath ,\ @noop journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 015001 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    \ Yang , author H

    author author S.-Y. \ Yang , author H. Yang , author E. Derunova , author S. S. \ Parkin , author B. Yan , \ and\ author M. N. \ Ali ,\ @noop journal journal Adv. Phys. X \ volume 3 ,\ pages 1414631 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    author author L. M. \ Schoop , author F. Pielnhofer , \ and\ author B. V. \ Lotsch ,\ @noop journal journal Chem. Mater. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 3155 ( year 2018 a ) NoStop

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Klemenz , author S

    author author S. Klemenz , author S. Lei , \ and\ author L. M. \ Schoop ,\ 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010114 journal journal Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 185 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010114 2019

  6. [6]

    \ Yang \ and\ author N

    author author B.-J. \ Yang \ and\ author N. Nagaosa ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 4898 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    author author Q. D. \ Gibson , author L. M. \ Schoop , author L. Muechler , author L. Xie , author M. Hirschberger , author N. P. \ Ong , author R. Car , \ and\ author R. J. \ Cava ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 205128 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Bradlyn , author J

    author author B. Bradlyn , author J. Cano , author Z. Wang , author M. Vergniory , author C. Felser , author R. J. \ Cava , \ and\ author B. A. \ Bernevig ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 353 ,\ pages aaf5037 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page 2016

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    author author B. J. \ Wieder , author Y. Kim , author A. M. \ Rappe , \ and\ author C. L. \ Kane ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.186402 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 186402 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    author author L. M. \ Schoop , author A. Topp , author J. Lippmann , author F. Orlandi , author L. M \"u chler , author M. G. \ Vergniory , author Y. Sun , author A. W. \ Rost , author V. Duppel , author M. Krivenkov , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Sci. Adv \ volume 4 ,\ pag...

    2018

  3. [11]

    Cano , author B

    author author J. Cano , author B. Bradlyn , \ and\ author M. Vergniory ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.12867 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1904 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Kim , author B

    author author Y. Kim , author B. J. \ Wieder , author C. L. \ Kane , \ and\ author A. M. \ Rappe ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 115 ,\ pages 036806 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  5. [13]

    author author Y. H. \ Chan , author C. K. \ Chiu , author M. Y. \ Chou , \ and\ author A. P. \ Schnyder ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 205132 ( year 2016 a ) NoStop

    2016

  6. [14]

    Yamakage , author Y

    author author A. Yamakage , author Y. Yamakawa , author Y. Tanaka , \ and\ author Y. Okamoto ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn \ volume 85 ,\ pages 013708 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  7. [15]

    \ Chiu \ and\ author A

    author author C.-K. \ Chiu \ and\ author A. P. \ Schnyder ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.205136 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 205136 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    Bzdu s ek , author Q

    author author T. Bzdu s ek , author Q. Wu , author A. R \"u egg , author M. Sigrist , \ and\ author A. A. \ Soluyanov ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 538 ,\ pages 75 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  9. [17]

    Bi , author Z

    author author R. Bi , author Z. Yan , author L. Lu , \ and\ author Z. Wang ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 201305 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  10. [18]

    Ezawa ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author M. Ezawa ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 041202 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  11. [19]

    Hu , author S.-Y

    author author J. Hu , author S.-Y. \ Xu , author N. Ni , \ and\ author Z. Mao ,\ @noop journal journal Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. \ volume 49 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  12. [20]

    Lv , author H

    author author B. Lv , author H. Weng , author B. Fu , author X. Wang , author H. Miao , author J. Ma , author P. Richard , author X. Huang , author L. Zhao , author G. Chen , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 5 ,\ pages 031013 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  13. [21]

    Yang , author Z

    author author L. Yang , author Z. Liu , author Y. Sun , author H. Peng , author H. Yang , author T. Zhang , author B. Zhou , author Y. Zhang , author Y. Guo , author M. Rahn , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nature physics \ volume 11 ,\ pages 728 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  14. [22]

    \ Huang , author S.-Y

    author author S.-M. \ Huang , author S.-Y. \ Xu , author I. Belopolski , author C.-C. \ Lee , author G. Chang , author B. Wang , author N. Alidoust , author G. Bian , author M. Neupane , author C. Zhang , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 7373 ( ...

    2015

  15. [23]

    Huang , author L

    author author X. Huang , author L. Zhao , author Y. Long , author P. Wang , author D. Chen , author Z. Yang , author H. Liang , author M. Xue , author H. Weng , author Z. Fang , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 5 ,\ pages 031023 ( year 2015 b ) NoStop

    2015

  16. [24]

    Arnold , author C

    author author F. Arnold , author C. Shekhar , author S.-C. \ Wu , author Y. Sun , author R. D. \ Dos Reis , author N. Kumar , author M. Naumann , author M. O. \ Ajeesh , author M. Schmidt , author A. G. \ Grushin , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 7 ,\ pag...

    2016

  17. [25]

    \ Zhang , author S.-Y

    author author C.-L. \ Zhang , author S.-Y. \ Xu , author I. Belopolski , author Z. Yuan , author Z. Lin , author B. Tong , author G. Bian , author N. Alidoust , author C.-C. \ Lee , author S.-M. \ Huang , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 10735 (...

    2016

  18. [26]

    Hirschberger , author S

    author author M. Hirschberger , author S. Kushwaha , author Z. Wang , author Q. Gibson , author S. Liang , author C. A. \ Belvin , author B. A. \ Bernevig , author R. J. \ Cava , \ and\ author N. P. \ Ong ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Mater. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1161 ( year 20...

    2016

  19. [27]

    Liang , author J

    author author S. Liang , author J. Lin , author S. Kushwaha , author J. Xing , author N. Ni , author R. J. \ Cava , \ and\ author N. P. \ Ong ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 8 ,\ pages 031002 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  20. [28]

    de Juan , author A

    author author F. de Juan , author A. G. \ Grushin , author T. Morimoto , \ and\ author J. E. \ Moore ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 15995 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  21. [29]

    Ma , author S.-Y

    author author Q. Ma , author S.-Y. \ Xu , author C.-K. \ Chan , author C.-L. \ Zhang , author G. Chang , author Y. Lin , author W. Xie , author T. Palacios , author H. Lin , author S. Jia , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 842 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  22. [30]

    Yu , author Z

    author author R. Yu , author Z. Fang , author X. Dai , \ and\ author H. Weng ,\ @noop journal journal Front. Phys. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 127202 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  23. [31]

    Bian , author T.-R

    author author G. Bian , author T.-R. \ Chang , author R. Sankar , author S.-Y. \ Xu , author H. Zheng , author T. Neupert , author C.-K. \ Chiu , author S.-M. \ Huang , author G. Chang , author I. Belopolski , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 10...

    2016

  24. [32]

    Belopolski , author D

    author author I. Belopolski , author D. S. \ Sanchez , author G. Chang , author K. Manna , author B. Ernst , author S.-Y. \ Xu , author S. S. \ Zhang , author H. Zheng , author J. Yin , author B. Singh , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.09992 \ ( year ...

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Liu , author R

    author author Z. Liu , author R. Lou , author P. Guo , author Q. Wang , author S. Sun , author C. Li , author S. Thirupathaiah , author A. Fedorov , author D. Shen , author K. Liu , author H. Lei , \ and\ author S. Wang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031044 journal journal Phys. Rev. X...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Manna , author Y

    author author K. Manna , author Y. Sun , author L. Muechler , author J. K \"u bler , \ and\ author C. Felser ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Rev. Mater. \ ,\ pages 1 ( year 2018 a ) NoStop

    2018

  27. [35]

    Manna , author L

    author author K. Manna , author L. Muechler , author T.-H. \ Kao , author R. Stinshoff , author Y. Zhang , author J. Gooth , author N. Kumar , author G. Kreiner , author K. Koepernik , author R. Car , author J. K\"ubler , author G. H. \ Fecher , author C. Shekhar , author Y. S...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Liu , author Y

    author author E. Liu , author Y. Sun , author N. Kumar , author L. Muechler , author A. Sun , author L. Jiao , author S.-Y. \ Yang , author D. Liu , author A. Liang , author Q. Xu , author J. Kroder , author V. S \"u , author H. Borrmann , author C. Shekhar , author Z. Wang , ...

    2018

  29. [37]

    Sun , author Y

    author author Y. Sun , author Y. Zhang , author C. Felser , \ and\ author B. Yan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.146403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 146403 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    Sun , author Y

    author author Y. Sun , author Y. Zhang , author C.-X. \ Liu , author C. Felser , \ and\ author B. Yan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.235104 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 235104 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    Derunova , author Y

    author author E. Derunova , author Y. Sun , author C. Felser , author S. S. P. \ Parkin , author B. Yan , \ and\ author M. N. \ Ali ,\ @noop journal journal Sci. Adv. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 8575 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  32. [40]

    Pezzini , author M

    author author S. Pezzini , author M. R. \ Van Delft , author L. M. \ Schoop , author B. V. \ Lotsch , author A. Carrington , author M. I. \ Katsnelson , author N. E. \ Hussey , \ and\ author S. Wiedmann ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 178 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  33. [41]

    author author M. R. \ Van Delft , author S. Pezzini , author T. Khouri , author C. S. A. \ M \"u ller , author M. Breitkreiz , author L. M. \ Schoop , author A. Carrington , author N. E. \ Hussey , \ and\ author S. Wiedmann ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 12...

    2018

  34. [42]

    \ Chan , author C.-K

    author author Y.-H. \ Chan , author C.-K. \ Chiu , author M. Chou , \ and\ author A. P. \ Schnyder ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 205132 ( year 2016 b ) NoStop

    2016

  35. [43]

    author author L. M. \ Schoop , author M. N. \ Ali , author C. Stra er , author A. Topp , author A. Varykhalov , author D. Marchenko , author V. Duppel , author S. S. \ Parkin , author B. V. \ Lotsch , \ and\ author C. R. \ Ast ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 7 ,...

    2016

  36. [44]

    Topp , author J

    author author A. Topp , author J. M. \ Lippmann , author A. Varykhalov , author V. Duppel , author B. V. \ Lotsch , author C. R. \ Ast , \ and\ author L. M. \ Schoop ,\ @noop journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 125014 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  37. [45]

    Nakamura , author S

    author author T. Nakamura , author S. Souma , author Z. Wang , author K. Yamauchi , author D. Takane , author H. Oinuma , author K. Nakayama , author K. Horiba , author H. Kumigashira , author T. Oguchi , author T. Takahashi , author Y. Ando , \ and\ author T. Sato ,\ 10.1103/...

    doi

  38. [46]

    \ Fu , author C.-J

    author author B.-B. \ Fu , author C.-J. \ Yi , author T.-T. \ Zhang , author M. Caputo , author J.-Z. \ Ma , author X. Gao , author B. Lv , author L.-Y. \ Kong , author Y.-B. \ Huang , author P. Richard , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Sci. Adv. \ volume 5 ,\ pages eaau6459 (...

    2019

  39. [47]

    Kresse \ and\ author J

    author author G. Kresse \ and\ author J. Furthm \"u ller ,\ @noop journal journal Comput. Mat. Sci. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 15 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  40. [48]

    Wu , author S

    author author Q. Wu , author S. Zhang , author H.-F. \ Song , author M. Troyer , \ and\ author A. A. \ Soluyanov ,\ @noop journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 224 ,\ pages 405 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  41. [49]

    Hu , author Z

    author author J. Hu , author Z. Tang , author J. Liu , author X. Liu , author Y. Zhu , author D. Graf , author K. Myhro , author S. Tran , author C. N. \ Lau , author J. Wei , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 016602 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  42. [50]

    Alexandradinata , author Z

    author author A. Alexandradinata , author Z. Wang , \ and\ author B. A. \ Bernevig ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 6 ,\ pages 021008 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  43. [51]

    Alexandradinata , author X

    author author A. Alexandradinata , author X. Dai , \ and\ author B. A. \ Bernevig ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.155114 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 155114 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    Muechler , author A

    author author L. Muechler , author A. Alexandradinata , author T. Neupert , \ and\ author R. Car ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041069 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 6 ,\ pages 041069 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    Zak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.359 journal journal Phys

    author author J. Zak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.359 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 48 ,\ pages 359 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982 doi

  46. [54]

    Zak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2747 journal journal Phys

    author author J. Zak ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2747 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 62 ,\ pages 2747 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    1989 doi

  47. [55]

    author author W. P. \ Su , author J. R. \ Schrieffer , \ and\ author A. J. \ Heeger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1698 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 1698 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  48. [56]

    author author R. D. \ King-Smith \ and\ author D. Vanderbilt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.1651 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 47 ,\ pages 1651 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  49. [57]

    u neis , author L. M \

    author author A. Topp , author R. Queiroz , author A. Gr \"u neis , author L. M \"u chler , author A. W. \ Rost , author A. Varykhalov , author D. Marchenko , author M. Krivenkov , author F. Rodolakis , author J. L. \ McChesney , author B. V. \ Lotsch , author L. M. \ Schoop ,...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.