Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 54 references

The critical nature of the Ni spin state in doped NdNiO$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hole-doped NdNiO2 forms a copper-oxide-like singlet, so spin fluctuations cannot be the pairing glue.

desk verdict An honest exact-diagonalization phase diagram placing NdNiO2 near a singlet–triplet crossover, but the abstract oversells the singlet side and the input parameters carry no error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02557 v3 pith:53QSNMQ6 submitted 2019-09-05 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Mi Jiang , Mona Berciu , George A. Sawatzky This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
keywords NdNiO2nickelatesuperconductivityZhang-Ricesingletspin-statecrossoverMottinsulatorsuperexchangeexactdiagonalizationchargetransferenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Doped NdNiO$_2$ was expected to put an $S=1$ nickel spin on each site, which would be hard to reconcile with superconductivity. The authors show, using an impurity model with full nickel multiplet structure, that the NiO$_2$ layer sits in a critical region of parameter space: strong nickel-oxygen hybridization makes the added hole form a copper-oxide-like $^1A_1$ singlet (a Zhang-Rice-like state) instead of a triplet. The same parameters give a superexchange about an order of magnitude smaller than in cuprates, so antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations are very unlikely to glue the Cooper pairs. The triplet $^3B_1$ state remains close in energy, making the ground state tunable by strain or chemistry. If correct, this reframes what minimal model describes the nickelate layer and rules out one leading pairing mechanism.

What carries the argument

The central object is an impurity-model Hamiltonian $H = U_{dd} + T_{pd} + T_{pp} + \Delta + U_{pp}$ for a Ni ion embedded in a square lattice of O $2p$ orbitals, solved by exact diagonalization. What carries the argument is the competition between the full Coulomb multiplet on Ni ($U_{dd}$), the charge-transfer energy $\Delta$, and the Ni-O ($t_{pd}$) and O-O ($t_{pp}$) hoppings; the phase diagram in the $A$-$\Delta$ plane locates NiO$_2$ at the boundary between the $^1A_1$ singlet and $^3B_1$ triplet ground states of the two-hole bound state. The symmetry-labeled spectral functions and wavefunction weights show the switch from $d^9L_{b_1}$ to $d^8(a_1b_1)$ across the crossover.

What would settle it

Resolve the local symmetry and spin of the hole added to a NiO$_2$ layer--for example by Ni $L$-edge x-ray absorption or resonant inelastic x-ray scattering on a doped NdNiO$_2$ film, or by an independent embedded-cluster calculation with directly fitted $\Delta$ and $t_{pd}$ values. Observation of a robust $S=1$ ($^3B_1$) ground state with no low-lying singlet would falsify the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using exact diagonalization of a one- or two-hole impurity Hamiltonian in which a Ni ion sits in an infinite square lattice of oxygen $2p$ orbitals, and including the full $3d^8$ multiplet through Racah parameters, the authors find that for $\Delta\approx 7$--$9$ eV and $t_{pd}\approx 1.3$--$1.5$ eV the ground state of the added hole has $^1A_1$ symmetry. Its dominant wavefunction component is $d^9L_{b_1}$--one hole in $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and one in the in-plane oxygen $x^2-y^2$ ligand orbital--locked into a singlet, exactly the structure of a Zhang-Rice singlet. This is surprising because NiO$_2$ is nominally a Mott insulator, for which a Hund's-rule $^3B_1$ triplet ($d_{x^2-y^2}$ plus $d_{3z^2-r^2}$, total $S=1$) would be expected. The two states cross at $\Delta\approx 8.1$ eV for representative parameters, so NdNiO$_2$ is predicted to sit at a spin-state crossover. The paper further evaluates the superexchange $J_{dd} = 4t_{pd}^4/(\Delta^2 U_{dd}) + 8t_{pd}^4/(\Delta^2 (U_{pp}+2\Delta))$ and finds it roughly an order of magnitude smaller than in cuprates, which makes magnon-mediated pairing implausible.

Load-bearing premise

The whole conclusion depends on the guessed values of two energy scales: how much energy it costs to move an electron from oxygen to nickel, and how strongly nickel and oxygen orbitals mix; if either real value falls outside the assumed range, the doped hole would be a triplet rather than a singlet and the claim would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The doped NiO$_2$ layer should be modeled by a Zhang-Rice-like singlet state, not by an $S=1$ local-moment system.
  • Because the $^3B_1$ triplet is nearly degenerate, modest changes in lattice parameters from strain, pressure, or chemical substitution can switch the ground state, explaining sample-to-sample and film-versus-bulk variation.
  • The large $\Delta$ makes the superexchange $J_{dd}$ roughly an order of magnitude smaller than in cuprates, so antiferromagnetic correlations are weak and magnon exchange is unlikely to be the pairing glue.
  • If magnons are not the glue in this nickelate, then either nickelate superconductivity needs a different mechanism or cuprate superconductivity is not primarily magnon-mediated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension not pursued in the paper: if the system sits at a spin-state crossover, the superconducting $T_c$ should respond strongly to strain; pushing the ground state into the $^3B_1$ region should suppress superconductivity.
  • The same impurity-model calculation could be repeated for LaNiO$_2$; the paper's logic predicts that a lowered $\Delta$ or changed $t_{pd}$ tips its ground state toward the triplet, which would explain the absence of superconductivity there.
  • The mobile, strongly oxygen-centered hole in the $^1A_1$ state suggests pairing mechanisms based on charge-transfer fluctuations or interlayer coupling to Nd carriers, routes the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the nature of a hole doped into a NiO2 layer of NdNiO2, modeled as a Ni 3d9 impurity embedded in an infinite O 2p6 square lattice. Using exact diagonalization with the full Ni 3d8 multiplet, O 2p orbitals, and pd and pp hoppings, the authors compute the ground-state symmetry of the added hole as a function of the charge-transfer energy Δ and the Racah parameter A. They find a 1A1 Zhang-Rice-singlet-like ground state in the parameter range they associate with NdNiO2, with a 3B1 triplet state close in energy, and they argue that the large Δ makes the superexchange about one order of magnitude smaller than in cuprates, casting doubt on magnon-mediated pairing. The paper also notes that the parent compound's metallicity and the possible presence of Nd bands remain unresolved, and it proposes a testable sensitivity of the ground state to strain, pressure, and chemical substitution.

Significance. If the parameter assignment is correct, the result is significant: it would shift the description of doped NdNiO2 from a simple S=1 Mott system to a cuprate-like Zhang-Rice-singlet picture while simultaneously arguing against spin-fluctuation pairing. The exact-diagonalization calculation is exact for the stated model, the full 3d8 multiplet is included, and the parameters are not fitted to the target ground-state symmetry, so the calculation is not circular. The superexchange estimate is based on a standard formula and is robust to the singlet-triplet ambiguity, since it follows from the larger Δ. However, the central 'critical region' claim is only as reliable as the t_pd and Δ estimates, which carry no quantified uncertainty, and one key source is an unpublished self-cited fit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model and Results (Figs. 2 and 4)] The central claim that NdNiO2 falls inside the 1A1 region is not robust to the stated parameter uncertainty. The quoted ranges t_pd ≈ 1.3–1.5 eV and Δ ≈ 7–9 eV are taken from fits to ab initio results, one of which (Ref. 21) is an unpublished manuscript by the authors, and no error bars or sensitivity analysis are given. For the central values t_pd = 1.5 eV and A = 6.0 eV, Fig. 4 shows the 1A1–3B1 transition at Δ = 8.1 eV, which lies inside the quoted Δ range; for t_pd = 1.3 eV, the boundary moves to smaller Δ, so a large portion of the quoted parameter box yields a 3B1 triplet. The abstract states that the layers 'fall inside' the critical region without this caveat. Please either provide quantitative uncertainty estimates and a sensitivity analysis, or reformulate the central claim as conditional on a specific parameter box.
  2. [Model (parameter values)] There is an internal inconsistency in the stated relation between A and Udd. The text states Udd = A + 8B + 3C ≈ 6–7 eV, which with B = 0.15 eV and C = 0.58 eV gives A ≈ 3–4 eV; however, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 are computed at A = 6.0 eV, giving Udd ≈ 8.9 eV. Since A is one of the axes of the phase diagram and the quoted Δ range is only meaningful relative to Udd, this inconsistency must be resolved before the central claim can be assessed.
  3. [Abstract and Summary] The abstract's unqualified statement that the NiO2 layers 'fall inside' the critical region is not supported by the paper's own caveat in the Summary that the triplet 3B1 state is close in energy and small parameter changes could stabilize it, making superconductivity unlikely. Please make the abstract and the main conclusion reflect the near-degeneracy and the parameter sensitivity, rather than presenting the singlet ground state as an established fact.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] The word 'stochiometric' should be 'stoichiometric'.
  2. [Results] The phrase 'the doped states of a a Mott insulator' contains a duplicated article 'a'.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption and text] The text says 'The three lines show how the boundary shifts with tpd', but Fig. 2 contains four lines, for t_pd = 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 eV.
  4. [Fig. 2] The shaded ellipse is described only as 'the area we believe to be relevant'; please specify the parameter range it represents and the source of those bounds.
  5. [References] Reference [38] has an unmatched parenthesis in the journal/year field: 'Phys. Rev. B 101, 075107 (2020, URL ...'.
  6. [Summary and discussion] The word 'undertanding' should be 'understanding'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No formal circularity; the only flagged item is a minor self-citation in the t_pd parameter provenance, which is not load-bearing.

  1. other [Model, second paragraph (v3 page 2)]
    "We use fits to ab-initio results [21–23] to extract the hybridization between the Ni impurity and neighbor O, tpd ≈ 1.3−1.5 eV, and between adjacent O, tpp ≈ 0.55 eV."

    The t_pd range used to place NdNiO2 in the Fig. 2 phase diagram is attributed in part to Ref. [21], an unpublished manuscript co-authored by Sawatzky, so the central 'critical region' inference leans partly on a self-citation that cannot be independently checked. However, the same sentence also cites independent Refs. [22,23], and the paper explicitly qualifies the result as borderline, so this is a provenance and robustness caveat rather than a derivation that reduces to its input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the technical sense: the paper fixes a well-defined impurity Hamiltonian (Eq. 1), diagonalizes it, and reports the symmetry of the ground state (1A1 vs 3B1) and the spectral weights as outputs. The phase boundary near Δc=8.1 eV is computed, not fitted. The superexchange estimate uses a standard fourth-order formula [17] with Δ in the denominator, so the 'about one order smaller' statement follows directly from the larger Δ input rather than from the output. The parameter values Δ≈7–9 eV, Udd≈6–7 eV, B and C from atomic physics, and t_pd/t_pp from ab-initio fits are external inputs. The one questionable input is Ref. [21], an unpublished work by one of the authors, used in part for t_pd; however, independent citations and the paper's own acknowledgment of closeness to the crossover keep this at the level of a minor self-citation, not a logical circle. The Summary's admission that small parameter changes would stabilize the 3B1 state is an honest limitation, not evidence that the result was assumed.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a model prediction. The free parameters (t_pd, t_pp, Delta, A, B, C) are chosen from ab initio fits or atomic physics, not fitted to the target result, so circularity is low. The main assumptions are the restriction to Ni 3d and O 2p orbitals, the dilute-impurity approximation, and the applicability of the perturbative superexchange formula. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • t_pd (Ni-O hybridization) = 1.3-1.5 eV
    Taken from fits to ab initio results (Refs. 21-23); controls the pd hybridization that stabilizes the singlet. One source, Ref. 21, is an unpublished self-cited work.
  • t_pp (O-O hopping) = 0.55 eV
    Estimated as similar to cuprates; sets the O 2p bandwidth (8 t_pp about 4.5 eV), affecting the position of the O-derived states and the effective charge transfer gap.
  • Delta (charge transfer energy) = 7-9 eV
    Estimated for NiO2 from the upward shift of the d10 states; the key parameter that determines whether the system is in the singlet or triplet regime. A change of 1-2 eV could move NdNiO2 to the 3B1 side.
  • A (Racah Coulomb parameter) = 6.0 eV (used in Figs. 3-4)
    On-site Coulomb parameter in the multiplet Hamiltonian; the text relates U_dd = A + 8B + 3C to 6-7 eV, while the figures use A = 6 eV. The singlet-triplet energy difference depends on A.
  • B and C (Racah exchange parameters) = B = 0.15 eV, C = 0.58 eV
    Fixed to atomic physics values with the assumption that screening does not alter them; they set the multiplet splittings within d8 and influence the ordering of the 1A1 and 3B1 states.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Only the O 2p and Ni 3d states determine the low-energy physics of the NiO2 layer.
    Stated in the Introduction; ignores Nd 5d/4f bands and other orbitals. If a Nd band crosses the Fermi energy, the effective hole count and the low-energy model change, though the authors argue the NiO2 subsystem still needs to be understood.
  • domain assumption A single Ni1+ impurity embedded in an infinite O 2p lattice captures hole doping in the dilute limit.
    The impurity model studies one or two holes localized near one Ni center, not a finite density of doped holes. This assumes hole-hole interactions beyond the impurity are negligible.
  • domain assumption The Racah parameters B and C are set by atomic physics and unaffected by screening.
    Model section: the authors state B, C are 'set by atomic physics and not much influenced by screening effects, as verified experimentally in other systems with Ni2+ ions.'
  • standard math The perturbative superexchange formula J_dd = 4 t_pd^4/(Delta^2 U_dd) + 8 t_pd^4/(Delta^2 (U_pp + 2 Delta)) applies to NiO2.
    Taken from Ref. [17] (Zaanen-Sawatzky) and used in the Summary to conclude that the superexchange is an order of magnitude smaller than in cuprates, without computing J directly from the exact eigenstates.
  • domain assumption The finite 20x20 O lattice used in the exact diagonalization gives correct band edges and continuum structure.
    Results section: the authors note the continuum becomes smooth in the thermodynamic limit but band edges do not move. The bound-state energies may still be affected by finite size, but the main phase diagram is computed with this lattice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The critical nature of the Ni spin state in doped NdNiO$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/53QSNMQ6

@misc{pith2026190902557,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The critical nature of the Ni spin state in doped NdNiO$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/53QSNMQ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02557}
}
abstract

Superconductivity with $T_c \approx 15K$ was recently found in doped NdNiO$_2$. The Ni$^{1+}$O$_2$ layers are expected to be Mott insulators so hole doping should produce Ni$^{2+}$ with $S=1$, incompatible with robust superconductivity. We show that the NiO$_2$ layers fall inside a ``critical'' region where the large $pd$ hybridization favors a singlet $^1\!A_1$ hole-doped state like in CuO$_2$. However, we find that the superexchange is about one order smaller than in cuprates, thus a magnon ``glue'' is very unlikely and another mechanism needs to be found.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02557 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (color online) Sketch of a Mott insulator (top) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (color online) Phase diagram for the stability of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (color online) Spectral weight for addition of a doped hole, when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (color online) Variation of the ground state weights [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter 64, 189 (1986), URL https://doi. org/10.1007/BF01303701

    doi:10.1007/bf01303701 1986

  2. [2]

    P. W. Anderson, Science 316, 1705 (2007), ISSN 0036- 8075, URL http://science.sciencemag.org/content/ 316/5832/1705

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Crespin, P

    M. Crespin, P. Levitz and L. J. Gatineau, Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 79 , 1181-1194 (1983), URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/ 1983/F2/F29837901181#!divAbstract

    work page 1983

  4. [4]

    M. A. Hayward, M. A. Green, M. J. Rosseinsky and J. J. Sloan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 8843-8854 (1999), URL https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja991573i

    work page doi:10.1021/ja991573i 1999

  5. [5]

    M. A. Hayward and M. J. Rosseinsky, Solid State Sci. 5, 839-850 (2003), URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S1293255803001110

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    The critical nature of the Ni spin state in doped NdNiO$_2$

    is metallic, but recent reports found both thin films and bulk crystals that are insulators [8, 9]. As further discussed below, ab-initio studies are also divided; those that find a metallic band, locate it in the Nd layers. If this Nd band exists, charge neutrality demands that electrons present in the Nd layers in the stoichiometric compound, be compensat...

    work page Pith review arXiv 1909

  7. [7]

    et al., Nature 572, 624-627 (2019), URL https: //www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1496-5

    Li, D. et al., Nature 572, 624-627 (2019), URL https: //www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1496-5

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Kamihara et al., J

    Y. Kamihara et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(31), 10012 (2006), URL https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10. 1021/ja063355c

    work page 2006

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Zhou et al., Rare Metals 39, 368-374 (2020), URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s12598-020-01389-2

    X. Zhou et al., Rare Metals 39, 368-374 (2020), URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s12598-020-01389-2

    2020

  2. [10]

    Li et al., Communications Materials 1, 16 (2020), URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s43246-020-0018-1

    Q. Li et al., Communications Materials 1, 16 (2020), URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s43246-020-0018-1

    2020

  3. [11]

    Hepting et al., Nat

    M. Hepting et al., Nat. Materials 19, 381 (2020), URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41563-019-0585-z . 5

    2020

  4. [12]

    Liu et al., arXiv:1912.01332, URL https://arxiv

    Z. Liu et al., arXiv:1912.01332, URL https://arxiv. org/abs/1912.01332v2

    1912 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Nomura et al., Phys

    Y. Nomura et al., Phys. Rev. B 100, 205138 (2019), URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10. 1103/PhysRevB.100.205138

    2019

  6. [14]

    Bernardini et al., arXiv:1911.11788, URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/1911.11788

    F. Bernardini et al., arXiv:1911.11788, URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/1911.11788

    1911 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Zaanen, G

    J. Zaanen, G. A. Sawatzky and J. W. Allen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 418 (1985), URL https://journals.aps.org/ prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.418

    1985 doi

  8. [16]

    Zaanen and G

    J. Zaanen and G. A. Sawatzky, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 88, 8-27 (1990), URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0022459690902029

    1990

  9. [17]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759 (1988), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.37.3759

    1988

  10. [18]

    Zaanen and G

    J. Zaanen and G. A. Sawatzky, Canadian Jour- nal of Physics 65(10), 1262-1271 (1987), URL https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10. 1139/p87-201#.XWVkPPxew5k

    1987

  11. [19]

    M. E. Rose, Elementary Theory of Angular Momentum, Dover Publications (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Jiang, M

    M. Jiang, M. Moeller, M. Berciu and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. B 101, 035151, URL https://journals.aps. org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.035151

    doi

  13. [21]

    This is a considerable energy, which is why the proper modelling of the O band is important

    Note that the relevant energy scale is the bandwidth 8tpp ≈ 4.5 eV. This is a considerable energy, which is why the proper modelling of the O band is important

  14. [22]

    Foyevtsova, I

    K. Foyevtsova, I. Elfimov and G. A. Sawatzky, to be pub- lished

  15. [23]

    Si et al., Phys

    L. Si et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166402 (2020), URL https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.166402

    2020

  16. [24]

    Karp et al., arXiv:2001.06441, URL https://arxiv

    J. Karp et al., arXiv:2001.06441, URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2001.06441

    2001 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M. S. Hybertsen, M. Schlter and N. E. Christensen, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9028 (1989), URL https://journals.aps. org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9028

    1989 doi

  18. [26]

    Ballhausen, Introduction to ligand field theory, Mcgraw-Hill series in advanced chemistry (1962)

    C.J. Ballhausen, Introduction to ligand field theory, Mcgraw-Hill series in advanced chemistry (1962)

    1962

  19. [27]

    Eskes and G

    H. Eskes and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1415 (1988), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.61.1415

    1988

  20. [28]

    B. Lau, M. Berciu, and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 036401 (2011), URL https://journals.aps.org/ prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.036401

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    Ebrahimnejad, G

    H. Ebrahimnejad, G. A. Sawatzky and M. Berciu, Nature Physics 10, 951-955 (2014), URL https://www.nature. com/articles/nphys3130

    2014

  22. [30]

    Ebrahimnejad, G

    H. Ebrahimnejad, G. A. Sawatzky and M. Berciu, J. Phys: Cond. Matt. 28, 105603 (2016), URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 0953-8984/28/10/105603

    2016

  23. [31]

    Zhang and A

    Y.-H. Zhang and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023112 (2020), URL https://journals.aps.org/ prresearch/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2. 023112

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    Zaanen, A

    J. Zaanen, A. M. Oles and P. Horsch, Phys. Rev. B 46, 5798(R) (1992), URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5798

    1992 doi

  25. [33]

    Lee and W

    K.-W. Lee and W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. B 70, 165109 (2004), URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.165109

    2004 doi

  26. [34]

    Botana and M

    A.-S. Botana and M. R. Norman, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011024 (2020), URL https://journals.aps.org/prx/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011024

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    Sakakibara et al., arXiv:1909.00060v2, URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/1909.00060v2

    H. Sakakibara et al., arXiv:1909.00060v2, URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/1909.00060v2

    1909 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gao et al., arXiv:1909.04657, URL https://arxiv

    J. Gao et al., arXiv:1909.04657, URL https://arxiv. org/abs/1909.04657

    1909 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Ryee et al., Phys

    S. Ryee et al., Phys. Rev. B 101, 064513 (2020), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.064513

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Jiang et al., Phys

    P. Jiang et al., Phys. Rev. B 100, 201106 (2019), URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevB.100.201106

    2019

  31. [39]

    Hirayama et al., Phys

    M. Hirayama et al., Phys. Rev. B 101, 075107 (2020, URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.075107

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    Gu et al., arXiv:1911.00814, URL https://arxiv

    Y. Gu et al., arXiv:1911.00814, URL https://arxiv. org/abs/1911.00814

    1911 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Lechermann, Phys

    F. Lechermann, Phys. Rev. B 101, 081110 (2020), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.081110

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Wu et al., Phys

    X. Wu et al., Phys. Rev. B 101, 060504 (2020), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.060504

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    Zhang et al., Phys

    H. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013214 (2020), URL https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013214

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Zhang et al., Phys

    G. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. B 101, 020501 (2020), URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevB.101.020501

    2020

  37. [45]

    J. E. Hirsch and F. Marsiglio, Physica C: Su- perconductivity 566, 1353534 (2019), URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0921453419303053

    2019

  38. [46]

    Werner and S

    P. Werner and S. Hoshino, Phys. Rev. B 101, 041104 (2020), URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.041104

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    Hu and C

    L. Hu and C. Wu, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 032046 (2019), URL https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.032046

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    Bernardini, V

    F. Bernardini, V. Olevano and A. Cano, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013219 (2020), URL https: //journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.2.013219

    2020

  41. [49]

    Fu et al., arXiv:1911.03177, URL https://arxiv

    Y. Fu et al., arXiv:1911.03177, URL https://arxiv. org/abs/1911.03177

    1911 arXiv

  42. [50]

    M. Choi, K. Lee and W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. B 101, 020503 (2020), URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/ abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.020503

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    Chang, J

    J. Chang, J. Zhao and Y. Ding, arXiv:1911.12731, URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12731v1

    1911 arXiv

  44. [52]

    E. F. Talantsev, arXiv:1912.06099, URL https://arxiv. org/abs/1912.06099

    1912 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kitatani et al., arXiv:2002.12230, URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2002.12230

    M. Kitatani et al., arXiv:2002.12230, URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2002.12230

    2002 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Been et al., arXiv:2002.12300, URL https://arxiv

    E. Been et al., arXiv:2002.12300, URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2002.12300

    2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.