Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Non-Bayesian Social Learning with Uncertain Models over Time-Varying Directed Graphs

Optimization and Control · Submitted 10 Sep 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that existing non-Bayesian social learning approaches may select a wrong hypothesis with non-zero probability under these conditions.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.84 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1909.04255 (version 1)
Pith IDPETZ5K37, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAli Jadbabaie, C\'esar A. Uribe, James Z. Hare, Lance Kaplan. "Non-Bayesian Social Learning with Uncertain Models over Time-Varying Directed Graphs." arXiv:1909.04255 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/PETZ5K37
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,268 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.11 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the problem of non-Bayesian social learning with uncertain models, in which a network of agents seek to cooperatively identify the state of the world based on a sequence of observed signals. In contrast with the existing literature, we focus our attention on the scenario where the statistical models held by the agents about possible states of the world are built from finite observations. We show that existing non-Bayesian social learning approaches may select a wrong hypothesis with non-zero probability under these conditions. Therefore, we propose a new algorithm to iteratively construct a set of beliefs that indicate whether a certain hypothesis is supported by the empirical evidence. This new algorithm can be implemented over time-varying directed graphs, with non{-}doubly stochastic weights.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the problem of non-Bayesian social learning with uncertain models, in which a network of agents seek to cooperatively identify the state of the world based on a sequence of observed signals. background 0.84 0.48 0.04 asserted 0.90
s1 In contrast with the existing literature, we focus our attention on the scenario where the statistical models held by the agents about possible states of the world are built from finite observations. contribution 0.48 0.47 0.04 asserted 0.89
s2 We show that existing non-Bayesian social learning approaches may select a wrong hypothesis with non-zero probability under these conditions. result 0.53 0.57 0.27 hedged possibility 0.84
s3 Therefore, we propose a new algorithm to iteratively construct a set of beliefs that indicate whether a certain hypothesis is supported by the empirical evidence. contribution 0.71 0.90 0.21 asserted 0.99
s4 This new algorithm can be implemented over time-varying directed graphs, with non{-}doubly stochastic weights. method 0.58 0.80 0.11 asserted 0.83

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the problem of non-Bayesian social learning with uncertain models, in which a network of agents seek to cooperatively identify the state of the world based on a sequence of observed signals. In contrast with the existing literature, we focus our attention on the scenario where the statistical models held by the agents about possible states of the world are built from finite observations. We show that existing non-Bayesian social learning approaches may select a wrong hypothesis with non-zero probability under these conditions. Therefore, we propose a new algorithm to iteratively construct a set of beliefs that indicate whether a certain hypothesis is supported by the empirical evidence. This new algorithm can be implemented over time-varying directed graphs, with non{-}doubly stochastic weights.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
  • There, we showed that each false hypothesis $θ$ gets rejected exponentially fast by every agent at the network-independent rate $max_v∈𝒱 K_v(θ^*,θ)$.[In contrast, for linear [ref] and log-linear [ref] rules, the corresponding rate is a convex combination of the relative entropies $K_v(θ^*,θ), v∈𝒱$.] From [ref], we note that under highly sparse communication regimes which correspond to $α< 1$, although learning occurs exponentially fast, the learning rate gets lowered relative to [ref] .

    Distributed Inference with Sparse and Quantized Communication · Theoretical Guarantees for Algorithm [ref] · 0.98

Cites it as background 2 papers
  • Variations of these learning rules have been proposed to handle fixed and time-varying graphs [ref] , weakly-connected graphs [ref] , increasing self-confidence [ref] , compact hypotheses sets [ref] , and adversarial attacks [ref] .

    Non-Bayesian Social Learning with Gaussian Uncertain Models · Introduction · 0.93

  • These techniques can be broadly classified in terms of the data aggregation mechanism: while consensus-based linear [ref] and log-linear [ref] rules have been well studied, [ref] and [ref] propose a min-protocol that leads to improved asymptotic learning rates over previous approaches.

    Distributed Inference with Sparse and Quantized Communication · Introduction · 0.96

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.