Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Equations of state for ruthenium and rhodium

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.05391 v1 pith:KASAIX5N submitted 2019-09-11 physics.comp-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

classification physics.comp-phcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords atom-in-jelliumcalculationselementscalculatedcolddatadebyeelectronic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ru and Rh are interesting cases for comparing equations of state (EOS), because most general purpose EOS are semi-empirical, relying heavily on shock data, and none has been reported for Ru. EOS were calculated for both elements using all-electron atom-in-jellium theory, and cold compression curves were calculated for the common crystal types using the multi-ion pseudopotential approach. Previous EOS constructed for these elements used Thomas-Fermi (TF) theory for the electronic behavior at high temperatures, which neglects electronic shell structure; the atom-in-jellium EOS exhibited pronounced features from the excitation of successive electron shells. Otherwise, the EOS matched surprisingly well, especially considering the lack of experimental data for Ru. The TF-based EOS for Ru may however be inaccurate in the multi-terapascal range needed for some high energy density experiments. The multi-ion calculations predicted that the hexagonal close-packed phase of Ru remains stable to at least 2.5 TPa and possibly 10 TPa, and that its c/a should gradually increase to the ideal value. A method was devised to estimate the variation in Debye temperature from the cold curve, and thus estimate the ion-thermal EOS without requiring relatively expensive dynamical force calculations, in a form convenient for adjusting EOS or phase boundaries. The Debye temperature estimated in this way was similar to the result from atom-in-jellium calculations. We also predict the high-pressure melt loci of both elements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools