Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimal Verification of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger States

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.08979 v2 pith:I6ERSAWY submitted 2019-09-19 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

classification quant-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords optimalprotocolsstateslocalconstructmeasurementsverifyingdimension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct optimal protocols for verifying qubit and qudit GHZ states using local projective measurements. When the local dimension is a prime, an optimal protocol is constructed from Pauli measurements only. Our protocols provide a highly efficient way for estimating the fidelity and certifying genuine multipartite entanglement. In particular, they enable the certification of genuine multipartite entanglement using only one test when the local dimension is sufficiently large. By virtue of adaptive local projective measurements, we then construct protocols for verifying GHZ-like states that are optimal over all protocols based on one-way communication. The efficiency can be improved further if additional communications are allowed. Finally, we construct optimal protocols for verifying GHZ states and nearly optimal protocols for GHZ-like states in the adversarial scenario.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. General framework for verifying pure quantum states in the adversarial scenario

    quant-ph 2019-09 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    A general verification framework shows that pure quantum states can be certified against adversarial state preparation with at most a constant-factor overhead over nonadversarial verification.

Pith tools