REVIEW 3 cited by
Unphysical properties in a class of interacting dark energy models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Models with non-gravitational interactions between the dark matter and dark energy components are an alternative to the standard cosmological scenario. These models are characterized by an interaction term, and a frequently used parameterization is $Q = 3\xi H \rho_{x}$, where $H$ is the Hubble parameter and $\rho_{x}$ is the dark energy density. Although current observations support such a model for negative values of the interaction parameter $\xi$, we show here that this interval of values of $\xi$ leads the model to predict a violation of the Weak Energy Condition (WEC) for the dark matter density, regardless of the value of the equation-of-state parameter of the dark energy component. This violation is accompanied by unphysical instabilities of matter perturbations.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Quasar cosmology II: joint analyses with Cosmic Microwave Background
Quasar, supernova, BAO, DES, and CMB data are jointly compatible only in an interacting dark-energy model, not in Lambda-CDM, wCDM, or CPL.
-
Stage IV CMB forecasts for warm inflation
Future CMB surveys are forecast to tighten the dissipation parameter of quartic warm inflation by up to an order of magnitude and to exclude the cubic dissipation model under a null tensor-to-scalar ratio.
-
Interacting dark energy in the early 2020s: a promising solution to the $H_0$ and cosmic shear tensions
An interacting dark energy model with coupling proportional to the dark energy density alleviates the H0 and S8 tensions in Planck 2018 data but is not preferred once BAO and supernova data are included.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.