Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

NLVR2 Visual Bias Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.10411 v1 pith:6W5C7O5A submitted 2019-09-23 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords biasnlvr2visualdatapotentialrobustanalysisevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

NLVR2 (Suhr et al., 2019) was designed to be robust for language bias through a data collection process that resulted in each natural language sentence appearing with both true and false labels. The process did not provide a similar measure of control for visual bias. This technical report analyzes the potential for visual bias in NLVR2. We show that some amount of visual bias likely exists. Finally, we identify a subset of the test data that allows to test for model performance in a way that is robust to such potential biases. We show that the performance of existing models (Li et al., 2019; Tan and Bansal 2019) is relatively robust to this potential bias. We propose to add the evaluation on this subset of the data to the NLVR2 evaluation protocol, and update the official release to include it. A notebook including an implementation of the code used to replicate this analysis is available at http://nlvr.ai/NLVR2BiasAnalysis.html.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating MLLMs with Multimodal Multi-image Reasoning Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MMRB is the first benchmark combining multi-image inputs with chain-of-thought reasoning annotations, and its evaluation shows open-source MLLMs trail commercial models while multi-image reward models are unstable.

  2. LaCo: Efficient Layer-wise Compression of Visual Tokens for Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Inserting a pixel-shuffle plus residual patch-merge layer inside the vision encoder compresses visual tokens more efficiently than post-encoder compression, at modest accuracy cost.

  3. Analyze-Prompt-Reason: A Collaborative Agent-Based Framework for Multi-Image Vision-Language Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A prompt-engineered Claude 3.7, guided by GPT-4o-generated prompts and few-shot examples, reaches near-ceiling accuracy on most of the 18 MIRAGE multi-image reasoning tasks.

Pith tools