Pith. sign in

REVIEW

RPM-Net: Robust Pixel-Level Matching Networks for Self-Supervised Video Object Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.13247 v2 pith:ESHHCFCY submitted 2019-09-29 cs.CV

RPM-Net: Robust Pixel-Level Matching Networks for Self-Supervised Video Object Segmentation

classification cs.CV
keywords objectvideomatchingsegmentationself-supervisedconvolutiondeformablemodule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce a self-supervised approach for video object segmentation without human labeled data.Specifically, we present Robust Pixel-level Matching Net-works (RPM-Net), a novel deep architecture that matches pixels between adjacent frames, using only color information from unlabeled videos for training. Technically, RPM-Net can be separated in two main modules. The embed-ding module first projects input images into high dimensional embedding space. Then the matching module with deformable convolution layers matches pixels between reference and target frames based on the embedding features.Unlike previous methods using deformable convolution, our matching module adopts deformable convolution to focus on similar features in spatio-temporally neighboring pixels.Our experiments show that the selective feature sampling improves the robustness to challenging problems in video object segmentation such as camera shake, fast motion, deformation, and occlusion. Also, we carry out comprehensive experiments on three public datasets (i.e., DAVIS-2017,SegTrack-v2, and Youtube-Objects) and achieve state-of-the-art performance on self-supervised video object seg-mentation. Moreover, we significantly reduce the performance gap between self-supervised and fully-supervised video object segmentation (41.0% vs. 52.5% on DAVIS-2017 validation set)

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.