Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Addressing $\gamma$-ray emissions from dark matter annihilations in 45 milky way satellite galaxies and in extragalactic sources with particle dark matter models

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 5 Oct 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this work, we consider particle dark matter models described in the literature and after studying their phenomenologies, we calculate the $\gamma$-ray fluxes from the self annihilation of the dark matter within the framework of these models in case of each of these 45 dSphs. we then compare the computed results with the observational upper bounds for $\gamma$-ray flux reported by Fermi-LAT and Dark Energy Survey (DES) for each of the 45 dSphs.

how it is stated · asserted 0.97 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1910.02322 (version 3)
Pith IDFB6KN7A6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAshadul Halder, Debasish Majumdar, Madhurima Pandey, Shibaji Banerjee. "Addressing $\gamma$-ray emissions from dark matter annihilations in 45 milky way satellite galaxies and in extragalactic sources with particle dark matter models." arXiv:1910.02322 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/FB6KN7A6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,145 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.20 · compares with prior results 0.83 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The mass to luminosity ratio of the dwarf satellite galaxies in the Milky Way suggests that these dwarf galaxies may contain substantial dark matter. The dark matter at the dense region such as within or at the vicinity of the centres of these dwarf galaxies may undergo the process of self annihilation and produce $\gamma$-rays as the end product. The satellite borne $\gamma$-ray telescope such as Fermi-LAT reported the detection of $\gamma$-rays from around 45 Dwarf Spheroidals (dSphs) of Milky Way. In this work, we consider particle dark matter models described in the literature and after studying their phenomenologies, we calculate the $\gamma$-ray fluxes from the self annihilation of the dark matter within the framework of these models in case of each of these 45 dSphs. we then compare the computed results with the observational upper bounds for $\gamma$-ray flux reported by Fermi-LAT and Dark Energy Survey (DES) for each of the 45 dSphs. The fluxes are calculated by adopting different dark matter density profiles. We then extend similar analysis for the observational upper bounds given by Fermi-LAT for the continuum $\gamma$-ray fluxes originating from extragalactic sources.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The mass to luminosity ratio of the dwarf satellite galaxies in the Milky Way suggests that these dwarf galaxies may contain substantial dark matter. background 1.00 0.08 0.03 hedged possibility 1.00
s1 The dark matter at the dense region such as within or at the vicinity of the centres of these dwarf galaxies may undergo the process of self annihilation and produce $\gamma$-rays as the end product. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 hedged possibility 0.99
s2 The satellite borne $\gamma$-ray telescope such as Fermi-LAT reported the detection of $\gamma$-rays from around 45 Dwarf Spheroidals (dSphs) of Milky Way. background 0.98 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 In this work, we consider particle dark matter models described in the literature and after studying their phenomenologies, we calculate the $\gamma$-ray fluxes from the self annihilation of the dark matter within the framework of these models in case of each of these 45 dSphs. we then compare the computed results with the observational upper bounds for $\gamma$-ray flux reported by Fermi-LAT and Dark Energy Survey (DES) for each of the 45 dSphs. contribution 0.67 0.95 0.09 asserted 0.97
s4 The fluxes are calculated by adopting different dark matter density profiles. method 1.00 0.83 0.02 asserted 0.99
s5 We then extend similar analysis for the observational upper bounds given by Fermi-LAT for the continuum $\gamma$-ray fluxes originating from extragalactic sources. contribution 0.94 0.84 0.04 asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.62 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.70.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The mass to luminosity ratio of the dwarf satellite galaxies in the Milky Way suggests that these dwarf galaxies may contain substantial dark matter. The dark matter at the dense region such as within or at the vicinity of the centres of these dwarf galaxies may undergo the process of self annihilation and produce $\gamma$-rays as the end product. The satellite borne $\gamma$-ray telescope such as Fermi-LAT reported the detection of $\gamma$-rays from around 45 Dwarf Spheroidals (dSphs) of Milky Way. In this work, we consider particle dark matter models described in the literature and after studying their phenomenologies, we calculate the $\gamma$-ray fluxes from the self annihilation of the dark matter within the framework of these models in case of each of these 45 dSphs. we then compare the computed results with the observational upper bounds for $\gamma$-ray flux reported by Fermi-LAT and Dark Energy Survey (DES) for each of the 45 dSphs. The fluxes are calculated by adopting different dark matter density profiles. We then extend similar analysis for the observational upper bounds given by Fermi-LAT for the continuum $\gamma$-ray fluxes originating from extragalactic sources.

Human review
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 36 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
  • For the case of $B^1$ dark matter, the annihilation cross-section $B^1 B^1 ⟶qq$ is computed from the expression [ref] [equation] where $q_L^1$ is the first KK partner of the quark $q_L$, $Y_q_L^1$ and $m_q_L^1$ are respectively the corresponding hypercharge and mass while $θ_W$ is the Weinberg angle.

    Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter · Formalism for $γ$-ray flux calculations in case of dwarf galaxies from dark matter annihilation · 0.92

  • The multiplicity function $f(ν)$ in Eq. [ref] is computed using the relation [ref] , [equation] where $ν'=√(a)ν$.

    Large scale bias and the peak background split · Extragalactic $γ$-ray background and extragalactic $γ$-rays from dark matter annihilations · 0.91

  • In order to generate this demonstrative plot, all the necessary numerical calculations have been executed by performing HMFcalc [ref] code.

    HMFcalc: An Online Tool for Calculating Dark Matter Halo Mass Functions · Extragalactic $γ$-ray background and extragalactic $γ$-rays from dark matter annihilations · 1.00

Uses data or values from 8 papers
  • These Fermi-LAT observations upper bounds are obtained from [ref] .

    Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT · The $γ$-ray flux calculations for the dwarf galaxies and their comparison with the observations · 0.87

  • These Fermi-LAT observations upper bounds are obtained from [ref] .

    Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi-LAT Data · The $γ$-ray flux calculations for the dwarf galaxies and their comparison with the observations · 0.87

  • The mass density function $dn/dM(M,z)$ is written as [ref] , [equation] where $ρ_0, m$ is the matter density of the comoving background ($ρ_0, m=ρ_c Ω_m(1+z)^3$, $ρ_c$ is the critical density of the Universe), the ratio $ν= δ_c/σ(M)$ as discussed, where $δ_c$ ($≃1.686$, [ref] ) is the critical overdensity for spherical collapse and $σ^2(M)$ is the variance of density fluctuations of a sphere containing mass $M$ ($M ≃(4/3)πR^3 ρ_c (z_c)$ for collapse halos, $R$ being the comoving length and $z_c$ is the redshift at which the halo collapses).

    Mass function of dark matter halos · Extragalactic $γ$-ray background and extragalactic $γ$-rays from dark matter annihilations · 0.81

Compares with 2 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
  • It has been demonstrated [ref] that the WIMP dark matter component of this first model (describe later) satisfies these criteria along with the criteria for dark matter relic density given by Planck satellite borne experiment [ref] based on the observation and analysis of the anisotropies of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR).

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters · Introduction · 0.99

Cites as background 10 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.