Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Dark Matter Bound State Formation in Fermionic $Z_2$ DM model with Light Dark Photon and Dark Higgs Boson

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 10 Oct 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The emissions of a longitudinal vector boson (or somehow equivalently a Goldstone boson) during the DM bound state formations are crucial to induce a significant reannihilation process, reducing the dark matter relic abundance.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1910.04311 (version 2)
Pith ID56EWFNRQ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationPyungwon Ko, Toshinori Matsui, Yi-Lei Tang. "Dark Matter Bound State Formation in Fermionic $Z_2$ DM model with Light Dark Photon and Dark Higgs Boson." arXiv:1910.04311 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/56EWFNRQ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,424 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.29 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

If fermionic dark matter (DM) is stabilized by dark $U(1)$ gauge symmetry that is spontaneously broken into its subgroup $Z_2$, the particle contents of the model becomes very rich: DM and excited DM, both of them are Majorana fermions, as well as two dark force mediators, dark photon and dark Higgs boson are naturally present due to the underlying dark gauge symmetry. In this paper, we study the DM bound state formation processes within this scenario, assuming both dark photon and dark Higgs are light mediators and including the effects of excited DM. The Goldstone boson contributions to the potential matrix in the Schr\"{o}dinger equations are found to be important. The emissions of a longitudinal vector boson (or somehow equivalently a Goldstone boson) during the DM bound state formations are crucial to induce a significant reannihilation process, reducing the dark matter relic abundance. Most of the stringent constraints for this kind of dark matter considered in the literature are simply evaded.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 If fermionic dark matter (DM) is stabilized by dark $U(1)$ gauge symmetry that is spontaneously broken into its subgroup $Z_2$, the particle contents of the model becomes very rich: DM and excited DM, both of them are Majorana fermions, as well as two dark force mediators, dark photon and dark Higgs boson are naturally present due to the underlying dark gauge symmetry. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.97
s1 In this paper, we study the DM bound state formation processes within this scenario, assuming both dark photon and dark Higgs are light mediators and including the effects of excited DM. contribution 0.99 0.85 0.05 asserted 0.86
s2 The Goldstone boson contributions to the potential matrix in the Schr\"{o}dinger equations are found to be important. result 0.98 0.93 0.08 asserted 1.00
s3 The emissions of a longitudinal vector boson (or somehow equivalently a Goldstone boson) during the DM bound state formations are crucial to induce a significant reannihilation process, reducing the dark matter relic abundance. result 0.82 0.73 0.56 asserted 1.00
s4 Most of the stringent constraints for this kind of dark matter considered in the literature are simply evaded. result 0.75 0.45 0.18 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.93 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.50.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

If fermionic dark matter (DM) is stabilized by dark $U(1)$ gauge symmetry that is spontaneously broken into its subgroup $Z_2$, the particle contents of the model becomes very rich: DM and excited DM, both of them are Majorana fermions, as well as two dark force mediators, dark photon and dark Higgs boson are naturally present due to the underlying dark gauge symmetry. In this paper, we study the DM bound state formation processes within this scenario, assuming both dark photon and dark Higgs are light mediators and including the effects of excited DM. The Goldstone boson contributions to the potential matrix in the Schr\"{o}dinger equations are found to be important. The emissions of a longitudinal vector boson (or somehow equivalently a Goldstone boson) during the DM bound state formations are crucial to induce a significant reannihilation process, reducing the dark matter relic abundance. Most of the stringent constraints for this kind of dark matter considered in the literature are simply evaded.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

23 arXiv papers cite this in 34 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 23 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
  • * Radiative transitions between states of different Coulomb(-like) potentials, e.g. bound-state formation with emission of a charged scalar [ref] or a non-Abelian gauge boson [ref] , exhibit non-monotonic dependence on the incoming momentum, with peaks that can violate unitarity for a finite velocity range, even for fairly small values of the couplings.

    Unitarity in the non-relativistic regime and implications for dark matter · Unitarity violation · 0.96

Cites it as background 8 papers

What it cites · 79 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 2 papers
  • One can directly follow the processes to derive (5.21), (5.54) in Ref. [ref] , and just extend all the wave functions in two-component case to acquire the transition amplitudes for the bound state formation.

    Dark-matter bound states from Feynman diagrams · Calculation of Bound State Formation Cross Section · 0.86

  • Although Ref. [ref] did not consider the multi-component wave functions, we can just extend the “overlap” integrals $ℐ$, $𝒥⃗$ and $𝒦$ in the (2.7a-c) of Ref. [ref] to the two-component case rather than deriving them starting from the Dyson-Schwinger equations.

    Radiative bound-state-formation cross-sections for dark matter interacting via a Yukawa potential · Calculation of Bound State Formation Cross Section · 0.98

Uses the method or tool of 9 papers
  • Following Ref. [ref] and expanding $e^-i b⃗ ·r⃗$ into partial waves, we acquire the following overlap integrals for the lowest orders in the “spherical Bessel function indices” [equation] where $ℐ^t_…$ indicates the corresponding partial wave expansions for all the overlap integrals, ([ref])–([ref]), with the upper symbol $t$ being either empty or $±$.

    Radiative bound-state-formation cross-sections for dark matter interacting via a Yukawa potential · Calculation of Bound State Formation Cross Section · 0.98

  • Our discussions and derivations are based on the symbols in Ref. [ref] .

    Dark-matter bound states from Feynman diagrams · Calculation of Bound State Formation Cross Section · 0.93

  • Also based upon the steps listed in Ref. [ref] , we define [equation] where $⟨Γ⟩_X$ and $⟨Γ⟩_X ,dis$ are the thermal averaged decay width and the dissociation rate of the bound state, respectively.

    Gluino Coannihilation Revisited · Boltzmann Equations · 0.97

Uses data or values from 3 papers
Compares with 8 papers
Cites as background 68 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.