Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Image Difficulty Curriculum for Generative Adversarial Networks (CuGAN)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.08967 v2 pith:SHPG7COC submitted 2019-10-20 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML
keywords curriculumimagescasesdifficultyimagetraininglearningstrategies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the significant advances in recent years, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are still notoriously hard to train. In this paper, we propose three novel curriculum learning strategies for training GANs. All strategies are first based on ranking the training images by their difficulty scores, which are estimated by a state-of-the-art image difficulty predictor. Our first strategy is to divide images into gradually more difficult batches. Our second strategy introduces a novel curriculum loss function for the discriminator that takes into account the difficulty scores of the real images. Our third strategy is based on sampling from an evolving distribution, which favors the easier images during the initial training stages and gradually converges to a uniform distribution, in which samples are equally likely, regardless of difficulty. We compare our curriculum learning strategies with the classic training procedure on two tasks: image generation and image translation. Our experiments indicate that all strategies provide faster convergence and superior results. For example, our best curriculum learning strategy applied on spectrally normalized GANs (SNGANs) fooled human annotators in thinking that generated CIFAR-like images are real in 25.0% of the presented cases, while the SNGANs trained using the classic procedure fooled the annotators in only 18.4% cases. Similarly, in image translation, the human annotators preferred the images produced by the Cycle-consistent GAN (CycleGAN) trained using curriculum learning in 40.5% cases and those produced by CycleGAN based on classic training in only 19.8% cases, 39.7% cases being labeled as ties.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Low-Cost Video Editing with Lightweight Adaptors and Temporal-Aware Inversion

    cs.CV 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    GE-Adapter combines a temporal smoothness loss, bilateral-filtered DDIM inversion, and shared plus frame-specific prompt tokens to improve text-to-video editing, though the reported evidence is inconsistent.

  2. Efficient Temporal Consistency in Diffusion-Based Video Editing with Adaptor Modules: A Theoretical Framework

    cs.CV 2025-04 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper attempts, but fails, to prove convergence and stability guarantees for adapter-based temporal consistency in diffusion video editing.

Pith tools