REVIEW 1 cited by
A Comparison of Semantic Similarity Methods for Maximum Human Interpretability
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The inclusion of semantic information in any similarity measures improves the efficiency of the similarity measure and provides human interpretable results for further analysis. The similarity calculation method that focuses on features related to the text's words only, will give less accurate results. This paper presents three different methods that not only focus on the text's words but also incorporates semantic information of texts in their feature vector and computes semantic similarities. These methods are based on corpus-based and knowledge-based methods, which are: cosine similarity using tf-idf vectors, cosine similarity using word embedding and soft cosine similarity using word embedding. Among these three, cosine similarity using tf-idf vectors performed best in finding similarities between short news texts. The similar texts given by the method are easy to interpret and can be used directly in other information retrieval applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Basis Vector Metric: A Method for Robust Open-Ended State Change Detection
A simple trained basis-vector metric achieves 66.14% average accuracy on MIT-States noun-adjective classification, 0.91 points above Naive Bayes, but fails to beat logistic regression on adjective disambiguation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.