Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Exploring non-equilibrium quark-gluon plasma effects on charm transport coefficients

Nuclear Theory · Submitted 22 Oct 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Thus each non-equilibrium scenario affects $A$ and $\hat{q}$ of charm quarks in a different way.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1910.09889 (version 2)
Pith ID6YJFSEMQ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationElena Bratkovskaya, Joerg AICHELIN, Pierre Moreau, Taesoo Song. "Exploring non-equilibrium quark-gluon plasma effects on charm transport coefficients." arXiv:1910.09889 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/6YJFSEMQ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,837 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.33 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.85 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.96 · compares with prior results 0.78 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this article we investigate how the drag coefficient $A$ and $\hat{q}$, the transverse momentum transfer by unit length, of charm quarks are modified if the QGP is not in complete thermal equilibrium using the dynamical quasi-particle model (DQPM) which reproduces both, the equation-of-state of the QGP and the spatial diffusion coefficient of heavy quarks as predicted by lattice QCD calculations. We study three cases: a) the QGP has an anisotropic momentum distribution of the partons which leads to an anisotropic pressure b) the QGP partons have higher or lower kinetic energies as compared to the thermal expectation value, and c) the QGP partons have larger or smaller pole masses of their spectral function as compared to the pole mass from the DQPM at the QGP temperature. In the last two cases we adjust the number density of partons to obtain the same energy density as in an equilibrated QGP. In the first scenario we find that if the transverse pressure exceeds the longitudinal one for small heavy quark momenta $A$ becomes larger and $\hat{q}$ smaller as compared to an isotropic pressure. For heavy quarks with large momentum both, $A$ and $\hat{q}$ , approach unity. If the partons have less kinetic energy or a smaller pole mass as compared to a system in equilibrium charm quarks lose more energy. In the former case $\hat{q}$ decreases whereas in the latter case it increases for charm quark with a low or intermediate transverse momentum. Thus each non-equilibrium scenario affects $A$ and $\hat{q}$ of charm quarks in a different way. The modifications in our scenarios are of the order 20-50\% at temperatures relevant for heavy ion reactions. These modifications have to be considered if one wants to determine these coefficients by comparing heavy ion data with theoretical predictions from viscous hydrodynamics or Langevin equations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this article we investigate how the drag coefficient $A$ and $\hat{q}$, the transverse momentum transfer by unit length, of charm quarks are modified if the QGP is not in complete thermal equilibrium using the dynamical quasi-particle model (DQPM) which reproduces both, the equation-of-state of the QGP and the spatial diffusion coefficient of heavy quarks as predicted by lattice QCD calculations. contribution 0.99 0.81 0.06 asserted 0.79
s1 We study three cases: a) the QGP has an anisotropic momentum distribution of the partons which leads to an anisotropic pressure b) the QGP partons have higher or lower kinetic energies as compared to the thermal expectation value, and c) the QGP partons have larger or smaller pole masses of their spectral function as compared to the pole mass from the DQPM at the QGP temperature. contribution 0.65 0.81 0.03 asserted 0.96
s2 In the last two cases we adjust the number density of partons to obtain the same energy density as in an equilibrated QGP. method 0.98 0.80 0.02 asserted 0.98
s3 In the first scenario we find that if the transverse pressure exceeds the longitudinal one for small heavy quark momenta $A$ becomes larger and $\hat{q}$ smaller as compared to an isotropic pressure. result 1.00 0.95 0.11 asserted 1.00
s4 For heavy quarks with large momentum both, $A$ and $\hat{q}$ , approach unity. result 1.00 0.87 0.06 asserted 1.00
s5 If the partons have less kinetic energy or a smaller pole mass as compared to a system in equilibrium charm quarks lose more energy. result 1.00 0.88 0.11 asserted 1.00
s6 In the former case $\hat{q}$ decreases whereas in the latter case it increases for charm quark with a low or intermediate transverse momentum. result 1.00 0.89 0.07 asserted 1.00
s7 Thus each non-equilibrium scenario affects $A$ and $\hat{q}$ of charm quarks in a different way. interpretation 0.54 0.85 0.51 asserted 1.00
s8 The modifications in our scenarios are of the order 20-50\% at temperatures relevant for heavy ion reactions. result 0.99 0.92 0.19 asserted 1.00
s9 These modifications have to be considered if one wants to determine these coefficients by comparing heavy ion data with theoretical predictions from viscous hydrodynamics or Langevin equations. interpretation 0.96 0.15 0.25 asserted 0.89

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.63 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this article we investigate how the drag coefficient $A$ and $\hat{q}$, the transverse momentum transfer by unit length, of charm quarks are modified if the QGP is not in complete thermal equilibrium using the dynamical quasi-particle model (DQPM) which reproduces both, the equation-of-state of the QGP and the spatial diffusion coefficient of heavy quarks as predicted by lattice QCD calculations. We study three cases: a) the QGP has an anisotropic momentum distribution of the partons which leads to an anisotropic pressure b) the QGP partons have higher or lower kinetic energies as compared to the thermal expectation value, and c) the QGP partons have larger or smaller pole masses of their spectral function as compared to the pole mass from the DQPM at the QGP temperature. In the last two cases we adjust the number density of partons to obtain the same energy density as in an equilibrated QGP. In the first scenario we find that if the transverse pressure exceeds the longitudinal one for small heavy quark momenta $A$ becomes larger and $\hat{q}$ smaller as compared to an isotropic pressure. For heavy quarks with large momentum both, $A$ and $\hat{q}$ , approach unity. If the partons have less kinetic energy or a smaller pole mass as compared to a system in equilibrium charm quarks lose more energy. In the former case $\hat{q}$ decreases whereas in the latter case it increases for charm quark with a low or intermediate transverse momentum. Thus each non-equilibrium scenario affects $A$ and $\hat{q}$ of charm quarks in a different way. The modifications in our scenarios are of the order 20-50\% at temperatures relevant for heavy ion reactions. These modifications have to be considered if one wants to determine these coefficients by comparing heavy ion data with theoretical predictions from viscous hydrodynamics or Langevin equations.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

20 arXiv papers cite this in 23 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 14 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Effects of the pre-equilibrium phase are usually entirely ignored, but calculations recently performed in a framework of kinetic theory [ref] suggest that these effects are sizable.

    Heavy Quarks Embedded in Glasma · Introduction · 0.97

Cites it as background 8 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.