Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explainable Prediction of Adverse Outcomes Using Clinical Notes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.14095 v2 pith:LLUMJARX submitted 2019-10-30 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords clinicalnotesclinicallyinformationoutcomespredictionattentionmechanism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Clinical notes contain a large amount of clinically valuable information that is ignored in many clinical decision support systems due to the difficulty that comes with mining that information. Recent work has found success leveraging deep learning models for the prediction of clinical outcomes using clinical notes. However, these models fail to provide clinically relevant and interpretable information that clinicians can utilize for informed clinical care. In this work, we augment a popular convolutional model with an attention mechanism and apply it to unstructured clinical notes for the prediction of ICU readmission and mortality. We find that the addition of the attention mechanism leads to competitive performance while allowing for the straightforward interpretation of predictions. We develop clear visualizations to present important spans of text for both individual predictions and high-risk cohorts. We then conduct a qualitative analysis and demonstrate that our model is consistently attending to clinically meaningful portions of the narrative for all of the outcomes that we explore.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpretable phenotyping of Heart Failure patients with Dutch discharge letters

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Discharge letters alone let BERT and Aug-Linear models classify HFrEF vs HFpEF with external-validation AUCs of 0.84 and 0.81, and Aug-Linear explanations matched clinicians better than SHAP/LIME.

Pith tools