Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Heteroscedastic Calibration of Uncertainty Estimators in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.14179 v1 pith:Q4OMMVUG submitted 2019-10-30 stat.ML cs.LG

Heteroscedastic Calibration of Uncertainty Estimators in Deep Learning

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords uncertaintycalibrationdeepheteroscedasticcalibratedestimatesestimatorslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The role of uncertainty quantification (UQ) in deep learning has become crucial with growing use of predictive models in high-risk applications. Though a large class of methods exists for measuring deep uncertainties, in practice, the resulting estimates are found to be poorly calibrated, thus making it challenging to translate them into actionable insights. A common workaround is to utilize a separate recalibration step, which adjusts the estimates to compensate for the miscalibration. Instead, we propose to repurpose the heteroscedastic regression objective as a surrogate for calibration and enable any existing uncertainty estimator to be inherently calibrated. In addition to eliminating the need for recalibration, this also regularizes the training process. Using regression experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed heteroscedastic calibration with two popular uncertainty estimators.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.