Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.01914 v1 pith:2Y5BXRD6 submitted 2019-11-05 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords xgboostanalysisboostingcomparisongradienttechniqueadditionbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

XGBoost is a scalable ensemble technique based on gradient boosting that has demonstrated to be a reliable and efficient machine learning challenge solver. This work proposes a practical analysis of how this novel technique works in terms of training speed, generalization performance and parameter setup. In addition, a comprehensive comparison between XGBoost, random forests and gradient boosting has been performed using carefully tuned models as well as using the default settings. The results of this comparison may indicate that XGBoost is not necessarily the best choice under all circumstances. Finally an extensive analysis of XGBoost parametrization tuning process is carried out.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-dimensional Statistics Applications to Batch Effects in Metabolomics

    stat.ME 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new QC-based simultaneous test (QC-ST) and a covariance correction method (CoCo) are proposed to evaluate and reduce batch effects in metabolomics.

Pith tools