Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Metal-Insulator and Magnetic Phase Diagram of Ca₂RuO₄ from Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo and Dynamical Mean Field Theory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.02702 v1 pith:MHLCWPZE submitted 2019-11-07 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Metal-Insulator and Magnetic Phase Diagram of Ca₂RuO₄ from Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo and Dynamical Mean Field Theory

classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords fieldauxiliarycarlomethodsmontequantumdynamicalmean
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Layered perovskite ruthenium oxides exhibit a striking series of metal-insulator and magnetic-nonmagnetic phase transitions easily tuned by temperature, pressure, epitaxy, and nonlinear drive. In this work, we combine results from two complementary state of the art many-body methods, Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo and Dynamical Mean Field Theory, to determine the low-temperature phase diagram of Ca$_2$RuO$_4$. Both methods predict a low temperature, pressure-driven metal-insulator transition accompanied by a ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic transition. The properties of the ferromagnetic state vary non-monotonically with pressure and are dominated by the ruthenium $d_{xy}$ orbital, while the properties of the antiferromagnetic state are dominated by the $d_{xz}$ and $d_{yz}$ orbitals. Differences of detail in the predictions of the two methods are analyzed. This work is theoretically important as it presents the first application of the Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo method to an orbitally-degenerate system with both Mott and Hunds physics, and provides an important comparison of the Dynamical Mean Field and Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.